生物多样性

• • 上一篇    下一篇

植物复合群的形成机制与分类学研究进展

曾文敏1, 杨霞1, 邹成玉1, 李彦欣1, 王贤楠1, 魏依婷1, 徐艳琴1*, 周银2*   

  1. 1. 江西中医药大学药学院, 南昌 330004; 2. 武汉商学院食品科技学院, 武汉 430056
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-11 修回日期:2026-01-24 接受日期:2026-02-23
  • 通讯作者: 徐艳琴, 周银

Advances in formation mechanisms and taxonomy of plant species complexes

Wenmin Zeng1, Xia Yang1, Chengyu Zou1, Yanxin Li1, Xiannan Wang1, Yiting Wei1, Yanqin Xu1*, Yin Zhou2*   

  1. 1 School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330004, China 

    2 School of Food Science and Technology, Wuhan Business University, Wuhan 430056, China

  • Received:2025-08-11 Revised:2026-01-24 Accepted:2026-02-23
  • Contact: Yanqin Xu, Yin Zhou

摘要: 植物复合群(plant species complex)作为分类学研究的关键挑战, 由形态高度相似但遗传分化的近缘种、隐存种及多倍体种组成, 其分类困境将影响生物多样性评估与资源管理。本文拟通过系统梳理植物复合群的形成机制, 整理其形态分类研究进展, 阐明其形态保守和遗传分化的冲突关系, 提出了整合分类框架以摆脱分类困境, 并展望了其未来的研究方法与趋势, 以期为植物复合群的形成机制认知及隐存种界定、理解种间差异和进化关系奠定基础。研究发现, 植物复合群的形成受自然选择、基因流、多倍化及表观遗传调控协同驱动。形态证据在植物复合群分类中发挥着重要作用, 且在其辐射演化迅速和自然选择压力强劲时更具优势, 但易受表型可塑性、基因组杂交渗入及生态位保守性等因素影响。分子证据可弥补形态局限性, 但单一维度难以解析演化复杂性。分类问题的解决仍需以形态研究为重要基础, 当前植物复合群分类以形态、分子与生态多维互验的整合分类法为重要手段。为解决植物复合群分类困境, 多源数据整合是主要趋势。未来应构建“形态-分子-生态”三元校验体系, 通过智能形态技术量化表型变异、基因组系统发育分析揭示遗传分化、生态位模型验证环境适应性, 并结合地理区系背景构建动态分类系统。植物复合群的分类突破将深化对物种形成机制的认知, 为精准的生物多样性保护与资源可持续利用提供理论支撑。

关键词: 植物复合群, 形成机制, 形态分类, 基因流, 表型可塑性, 整合分类

Abstract

Background & Aim: The plant species complex, as a central and challenging issue in taxonomic research, comprises morphologically highly similar yet genetically divergent lineages, including cryptic species, hybrids, and polyploids. The taxonomic difficulties associated with these complexes would impact accurate biodiversity assessment and effective resource management. This review aims to systematically synthesize the formation mechanisms of plant species complexes and recent advances in their morphological taxonomy. It also seeks to elucidate the conflict between morphological conservatism and genetic divergence, propose an integrative classification framework, and outline future research directions and methodological trends. The ultimate goal is to establish a foundation for understanding the mechanisms of complex formation, delimiting cryptic species, interpreting interspecific differences and evolutionary relationships, and support germplasm utilization and species conservation. 

Progress: Research findings indicate that the formation of plant species complexes is collectively driven by natural selection, gene flow, polyploidization, and epigenetic regulation. Morphological evidence plays a crucial role in classifying plant species complexes and holds particular advantages during periods of rapid radiative evolution or under strong natural selection pressure. However, its utility is often limited by factors such as phenotypic plasticity, genomic introgression (hybridization), and niche conservatism. Although molecular evidence can compensate for some limitations of morphological data, relying solely on a single-dimensional approach remains insufficient for resolving the full complexity of evolutionary histories, including scenarios like incomplete lineage sorting or reticulate evolution. Addressing classification problems still requires taking morphological interpretation as an essential foundation. Contemporary taxonomy of plant species complexes increasingly relies on integrative methodologies that emphasize multidimensional validation combining morphological, molecular, and ecological evidence. The integration of multi-source data has become the main trend for solving the taxonomic predicament of plant species complexes. 

Prospects: Future research on plant species complexes should prioritize the construction of a robust “morphology-molecular-ecology” tripartite validation system. This involves quantifying phenotypic variation using advanced morphometric techniques and intelligent morphological technologies, elucidating genetic differentiation through genomic phylogenomic and population genetic analyses, and assessing environmental adaptability through ecological niche models. Furthermore, developing more efficient algorithmic models and incorporating phytogeographic regional backgrounds are essential for building a dynamic classification system. Advances in the taxonomy of plant species complexes will enhance our understanding of speciation mechanisms and provide a solid theoretical foundation for precise biodiversity conservation and the sustainable utilization of biological resources.

Key words: plant species complex, formation mechanisms, morphological taxonomy, gene flow, phenotypic plasticity, integrative classification