喀斯特季节性雨林木本植物胸高断面积分布格局及其对地形因子的响应

doi:10.17520/biods.2015207

生物多样性 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 30-39. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015207

• 研究报告: 生态系统多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

喀斯特季节性雨林木本植物胸高断面积分布格局及其对地形因子的响应

郭屹立^1,², 王斌^1,², 向悟生^1,², 丁涛^1,², 陆树华^1,², 黄甫昭^1,², 文淑均^1,², 李冬兴^1,², 何运林^1,², 李先琨^1,^2,^*()

1 广西喀斯特植物保育与恢复生态学重点实验室, 广西壮族自治区/中国科学院广西植物研究所, 广西桂林 541006;
2 广西友谊关森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站, 广西凭祥 532699

收稿日期:2015-07-18 接受日期:2015-11-02 出版日期:2016-01-20 发布日期:2016-06-12
通讯作者: 李先琨
基金资助:
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(31500342)、广西自然科学基金(2015GXNSFBA139050)和中国科学院西部之光项目(人字(2014) 91号)

Responses of spatial pattern of woody plants’ basal area to topographic factors in a tropical karst seasonal rainforest in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China

Yili Guo^1,², Bin Wang^1,², Wusheng Xiang^1,², Tao Ding^1,², Shuhua Lu^1,², Fuzhao Huang^1,², Shujun Wen^1,², Dongxing Li^1,², Yunlin He^1,², Xiankun Li^1,^2,^*()

1 Guangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin, Guangxi 541006
2 Guangxi Youyiguan Forest Ecosystem National Research Station, Pingxiang, Guangxi 532699

Received:2015-07-18 Accepted:2015-11-02 Online:2016-01-20 Published:2016-06-12
Contact: Li Xiankun

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

森林生态系统地上生物量的分布格局是物种分布格局的重要内容。局域尺度内因地形差异引起的生境异质性是地上生物量分布格局形成的环境基础。本文以弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林15 ha动态监测样地2011年第一次普查数据中每木个体为研究对象, 尝试以每20 m × 20 m样方内所有个体及不同径级类群的胸高断面积之和为木本植物地上生物量的衡量指标, 利用广义可加模型对喀斯特季节性雨林中胸高断面积之和的空间分布格局进行研究, 定量分析了其对7个地形因子的响应。结果表明, 洼地、山坡和山脊3种生境类型中, 所有个体的胸高断面积之和山坡最高、山脊最低, 且山脊与山坡、洼地的差异均显著; 广义可加模型结果显示, 不同地形因子对胸高断面积之和的解释偏差差异明显, 其中海拔、坡向、凹凸度、岩石裸露率对胸高断面积之和的解释偏差依次降低, 而干旱度指数、坡度和地形湿润指数解释偏差相对较小。喀斯特季节性雨林木本植物胸高断面积之和空间分布的异质性及其与地形因子之间的关系, 反映了胸高断面积之和在地形因子对土壤、水分和光照等条件重分配影响下的多重响应机制及生长策略。

关键词: 格局, 胸高断面积, 地形因子, 贡献率, 弄岗动态监测样地, 北热带喀斯特季节性雨林

Abstract

Spatial patterns of aboveground biomass are important aspect of species distribution patterns, whereas the environmental heterogeneity caused by the topographical differences in the scope of local scales is the environmental basis for the formation and evolution of this pattern in natural forest systems. In this study, we examined the spatial patterns of total basal area of woody plants, to quantitatively analyze the response mechanisms of the spatial patterns of total basal area to the seven topographic factors using a generalized additive model in a fully mapped 15 ha permanent plot in a northern tropical seasonal rainforest in a karst landscape in southern China. We used the total basal area of all the individuals and each DBH class in each 20 m × 20 m quadrat as a standard to measure the value of aboveground biomass of woody plants. Results showed that the hillside had the highest total basal area but the lowest was found at the ridge of the three habitat types. The total basal area of the ridge was significantly different between the hillside and the depression. Topographic factors had definite effects on the total basal area of woody plants, with the following sequence: elevation > aspect > convexity > rock-bareness rate (RBR) > altitude above channel (ACH) > slope > topographic wetness index (TWI). All topographical factors were statistically significant with the exception of the TWI and slope showing marginally significant. The relationships between the spatial variation of total basal area of woody plants and topographic factors reflected the response mechanisms and growth strategies of woody plants in a tropical seasonal rainforest under the effects of the redistribution of soil, water and light conditions.

Key words: pattern, basal area, topographic factors, contribution rate, Nonggang Dynamics Forest Plot, tropical karst seasonal rainforest

郭屹立, 王斌, 向悟生, 丁涛, 陆树华, 黄甫昭, 文淑均, 李冬兴, 何运林, 李先琨 (2016) 喀斯特季节性雨林木本植物胸高断面积分布格局及其对地形因子的响应. 生物多样性, 24, 30-39. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015207.

Yili Guo, Bin Wang, Wusheng Xiang, Tao Ding, Shuhua Lu, Fuzhao Huang, Shujun Wen, Dongxing Li, Yunlin He, Xiankun Li (2016) Responses of spatial pattern of woody plants’ basal area to topographic factors in a tropical karst seasonal rainforest in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China. Biodiversity Science, 24, 30-39. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015207.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2015207

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2016/V24/I1/30

图/表 4

参考文献 44

1	Alves LF, Vieira SA, Scaranello MA, Camargo PB, Santos FAM, Joly CA, Martinelli LA (2010) Forest structure and live aboveground biomass variation along an elevational gradient of tropical Atlantic moist forest (Brazil). Forest Ecology and Management, 260, 679-691.
2	Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.
3	Cantón Y, Del Barrio G, Solé-Benet A, Lázaro R (2004) Topographic controls on the spatial distribution of ground cover in the Tabernas badlands of SE Spain. Catena, 55, 341-365.
4	Chauvel A, Lucas Y, Boulet R (1987) On the genesis of the soil mantle of the region of Manaus, Central Amazonia. Brazil Experientia, 43, 234-241.
5	Clements R, Sodhi N S, Schilthuizen M, Ng PK (2006) Limestone karsts of Southeast Asia: imperiled arks of biodiversity. BioScience, 56, 733-742.
6	Condit R (1998) Tropical Forest Census Plots: Methods and Results from Barro Colorado Island, Panama and a Comparison with Other Plots. Springer, Berlin.
7	Deng JM, Qin BQ, Wang BW (2015) Quick implementing of generalized additive models using R and its application in bluegreen algal bloom forecasting. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 34, 835-842. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[邓建明, 秦伯强, 王博雯 (2015) 广义可加模型在R中的快捷实现及蓝藻水华预测分析中的应用. 生态学杂志, 34, 835-842.]
8	Deng ZQ (1988) Report on the investigation of karst geology from Nonggang Natural Reserve. Guihaia, (S1), 1-16. (in Chinese)
	[邓自强 (1988) 广西弄岗自然保护区综合考察报告. 广西植物, S1, 1-16.]
9	Dong X, Bennion H, Maberly SC, Sayer CD, Simpson GL, Battarbee RW (2012) Nutrients exert a stronger control than climate on recent diatom communities in Esthwaite Water: evidence from monitoring and palaeolimnological records. Freshwater Biology, 57, 2044-2056.
10	Engelbrecht BMJ, Kursar TA, Tyree MT (2005) Drought effects on seedling survival in a tropical moist forest. Trees: Structure and Function, 19, 312-321.
11	Guisan A, Edwards Jr TC, Hastie T (2002) Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecological Modelling, 157, 89-100.
12	Guo FT, Hu HQ, Jin S, Ma ZH, Zhang Y (2010) Relationship between forest lighting fire occurrence and weather factors in Daxing’an Mountains based on negative binomial model and zero-inflated negative binomial models. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 571-577. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郭福涛, 胡海清, 金森, 马志海, 张扬 (2010) 基于负二项和零膨胀负二项回归模型的大兴安岭地区雷击火与气象因素的关系. 植物生态学报, 34, 571-577.]
13	Guo YL, Wang B, Xiang WS, Ding T, Lu SH, Huang FZ, Li DX, Wen SJ, He YL, Li XK (2015a) Sprouting characteristics of tree species in 15 ha northern tropical karst seasonal rain forest dynamics plot in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 34, 955-961. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郭屹立, 王斌, 向悟生, 丁涛, 陆树华, 黄甫昭, 李冬兴, 文淑均, 何运林, 李先琨 (2015a) 弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林15 ha样地萌生特征分析. 生态学杂志, 34, 955-961.]
14	Guo YL, Wang B, Xiang WS, Ding T, Lu SH, Huang FZ, Li DX, Wen SJ, He YL, Li XK (2015b) Dynamics of density-dependent effects of tree species in a 15 ha seasonal rain forest plot in northern tropical karst in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China. Chinese Science Bulltin, 60, 1602-1611. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郭屹立, 王斌, 向悟生, 丁涛, 陆树华, 黄甫昭, 李冬兴, 文淑均, 何运林, 李先琨 (2015b) 弄岗喀斯特季节性雨林15 ha样地密度制约效应分析. 科学通报, 60, 1602-1611.]
15	Harms KE, Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB (2001) Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot. Journal of Ecology, 89, 947-959.
16	Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized Additive Models. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
17	Huang FZ, Wang B, Ding T, Xiang WS, Li XK, Zhou AP (2014) Numerical classification of associations in a northern tropical karst seasonal rain forest and the relationships of these associations with environmental factors. Biodiversity Science, 22, 157-166. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[黄甫昭, 王斌, 丁涛, 向悟生, 李先琨, 周爱萍 (2014) 弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林群丛数量分类及与环境的关系. 生物多样性, 22, 157-166.]
18	Jiang ZZ, Yuan DX (1999) Dynamics features of the epikarst zone and their significance in environment sand resources. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 20, 302-308. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[蒋忠诚, 袁道先 (1999) 表层岩溶带的岩溶动力学特征及其环境和资源意义. 地球学报, 20, 302-308.]
19	John R, Dalling JW, Harms KE, Yavitt JB, Stallard RF, Mirabello M, Hubbell SP, Valencia R, Navarrete H, Vallejo M, Foster RB (2007) Soil nutrients influence spatial distributions of tropical tree species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 864-869.
20	Kanagaraj R, Wiegand T, Comita LS, Huth A (2011) Tropical tree species assemblages in topographical habitats change in time and with life stage. Journal of Ecology, 99, 1441-1452.
21	Lai JS, Mi XC, Ren HB, Ma KP (2009) Species-habitat associations change in a subtropical forest of China. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 415-423.
22	Li XK, Su ZM, Lü SH, Ou ZL, Xiang WS, Qu Z, Lu SH (2003) The spatial pattern of natural vegetation in the karst regions of Guangxi and the ecological signality for ecosystem rehabilitation and reconstruction. Journal of Mountain Science, 21, 129-139. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李先琨, 苏宗明, 吕仕洪, 欧祖兰, 向悟生, 区智, 陆树华 (2003) 广西岩溶植被自然分布规律及对岩溶生态恢复重建的意义. 山地学报, 21, 129-139.]
23	Li YB, Hou JJ, Xie DT (2002) The recent development of research on karst system of Southwest China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 22, 365-370. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李阳兵, 侯建筠, 谢德体 (2002) 中国西南岩溶生态研究进展. 地理科学, 22, 365-370.]
24	Lin DM, Lai JS, Muller-Landau HC, Mi XC, Ma KP (2012) Topographic variation in aboveground biomass in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in China. PLoS ONE, 7, e48244.
25	Liu HF, Xue DY, Sang WG (2012) Effect of topographic factors on the relationship between species richness and aboveground biomass in a warm temperate forest. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 21, 1403-1407.
	[刘海丰, 薛达元, 桑卫国 (2012) 地形因子对暖温带森林群落物种丰富度-地上生物量关系的影响. 生态环境学报, 21, 1403-1407.]
26	Liu XL, Shi ZM, Yang DS, Liu SR, Yang YP, Ma QY (2005) Advances in study on changes of biodiversity and productivity along elevational gradient in mountainous plant community. World Forestry Research, 18(4), 27-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘兴良, 史作民, 杨冬生, 刘世荣, 杨玉坡, 马钦彦 (2005) 山地植物群落生物多样性与生物生产力海拔梯度变化研究进展. 世界林业研究, 18(4), 27-34.]
27	Luizão RCC, Luizão FJ, Paiva RQ, Monteiro TF, Sousa LS, Kruijt B (2004) Variation of carbon and nitrogen cycling processes along a topographic gradient in a central Amazonian forest. Global Change Biology, 10, 592-600.
28	Marshall AR, Willcock S, Platts PJ, Lovetta JC, Balmfordd A, Burgessd ND, Lathama JE, Munishih PKT, Saltera R, Shirimah DD, Lewisc SL (2012) Measuring and modelling aboveground carbon and tree allometry along a tropical elevation gradient. Biological Conservation, 154, 20-33.
29	Mascaro J, Asner G P, Muller-Landau H C, van Breugel M, Hall J, Dahlin K (2011) Controls over aboveground forest carbon density on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biogeosciences, 8, 1615-1629.
30	McEwan RW, Lin YC, Sun IF, Hsieh CF, Su SH, Chang LW, Song GZM, Wang HH, Hwong JL, Lin KC, Yang KC, Chiang JM (2011) Topographic and biotic regulation of aboveground carbon storage in subtropical broad-leaved forests of Taiwan. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 1817-1825.
31	McEwan RW, Muller RN (2006) Spatial and temporal dynamics in canopy dominance of an old-growth central Appalachian forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1536-1550.
32	Punchi-Manage R, Getzin S, Wiegand T, Kanagaraj R, Gunatilleke CVS, Gunatilleke IAUN, Wiegand K, Huth A (2013) Effects of topography on structuring local species assemblages in a Sri Lankan mixed dipterocarp forest. Journal of Ecology, 101, 149-160.
33	R Core Team (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
34	Sun HL (2005) Ecosystem of China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[孙鸿烈 (2005) 中国生态系统. 科学出版社, 北京.]
35	Sutherland WJ, Aveling R, Bennun L, Chapman E, Clout M, Côté IM, Depledge MH, Dicks LV, Dobson AP, Fellman L, Fleishman E, Gibbons DW, Keim B, Lickorish F, Lindenmayer DB, Monk5 KA, Norris K, Peck LS, Prior SV, Scharlemann JPW, Spalding M, Watkinson AR (2012) A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2012. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 12-18.
36	Swartzman G, Huang CH, Kaluzny S (1992) Spatial analysis of Bering Sea groundfish survey data using generalized additive models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, 1366-1378.
37	Takyu M, Aiba SI, Kitayama K (2003) Changes in biomass, productivity and decomposition along topographical gradients under different geological conditions in tropical lower montane forests on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Oecologia, 134, 397-404.
38	Tarboton DG (1997) A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research, 33, 309-319.
39	Valencia R, Foster RB, Villa G, Condit R, Svenning JC, Hernández C, Romoleroux K, Losos E, Magård E, Balslev H (2004) Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador. Journal of Ecology, 92, 214-229.
40	Wang B, Huang YS, Li XK, Xiang WS, Ding T, Huang FZ, Lu SH, Han WH, Wen SJ, He LJ (2014) Species composition and spatial distribution of a 15 ha northern tropical karst seasonal rain forest dynamics study plot in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China. Biodiversity Science, 22, 141-156. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王斌, 黄俞淞, 李先琨, 向悟生, 丁涛, 黄甫昭, 陆树华, 韩文衡, 文淑均, 何兰军 (2014) 弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林15 ha监测样地的树种组成与空间分布. 生物多样性, 22, 141-156.]
41	Wood SN (2001) mgcv: GAMs and generalized ridge regression for R. R News, 1, 20-25.
42	Wood SN (2004) Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized additive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 673-689.
43	Wood SN (2006a) Low rank scale invariant tensor product smooths for generalized additive mixed models. Biometrics, 62, 1025-1036.
44	Wood SN (2006b) Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, London.

径级 DBH Class (cm)	环境参数 Environmental parameters	r²_adj	累计解释偏差 Cumulative explained deviation (%)	赤池信息准则Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)
所有个体 All individuals	海拔 Elevation	0.148	16.1	-88.071
	坡向 Aspect	0.256	28.4	-130.984
	凹凸度 Convexity	0.291	33.1	-142.770
	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate	0.313	36.0	-148.860
	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index	0.314	36.4	-149.909
	坡度 Slope	0.322	37.4	-152.044
	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel	0.336	39.4	-156.461
DBH < 2.5	海拔 Elevation	0.113	12.6	-2,416.026
	坡向 Aspect	0.153	18.4	-2,425.371
	凹凸度 Convexity	0.193	22.8	-2,441.038
	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate	0.266	29.7	-2,477.055
	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index	0.303	34.0	-2,492.105
	坡度 Slope	0.311	34.9	-2,495.940
	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel	0.328	36.3	-2,506.965
2.5 ≤ DBH < 7.5	海拔 Elevation	0.412	42.1	-1,340.583
	坡向 Aspect	0.432	44.7	-1,348.138
	凹凸度 Convexity	0.462	48.9	-1,360.737
	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate	0.481	51.1	-1,371.831
	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index	0.505	53.1	-1,390.343
	坡度 Slope	0.540	57.6	-1,407.893
	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel	0.540	57.8	-1,410.145
7.5 ≤ DBH < 22.5	海拔 Elevation	0.194	21.0	-448.036
	坡向 Aspect	0.267	29.5	-476.660
	凹凸度 Convexity	0.305	34.4	-490.249
	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate	0.316	36.2	-492.008
	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index	0.334	38.0	-498.367
	坡度 Slope	0.339	38.5	-507.223
	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel	0.381	43.6	-522.046
22.5 ≤ DBH	海拔 Elevation	0.263	27.4	-193.325
	坡向 Aspect	0.321	34.7	-216.574
	凹凸度 Convexity	0.326	35.4	-216.982
	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate	0.335	36.5	-220.844
	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index	0.345	37.8	-225.257
	坡度 Slope	0.392	42.8	-250.109
	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel	0.398	43.7	-251.184

径级 DBH Class (cm)	环境参数 Environmental parameters	r²_adj	累计解释偏差 Cumulative explained deviation (%)	赤池信息准则Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)
所有个体 All individuals	海拔 Elevation	0.148	16.1	-88.071
	坡向 Aspect	0.256	28.4	-130.984
	凹凸度 Convexity	0.291	33.1	-142.770
	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate	0.313	36.0	-148.860
	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index	0.314	36.4	-149.909
	坡度 Slope	0.322	37.4	-152.044
	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel	0.336	39.4	-156.461
DBH < 2.5	海拔 Elevation	0.113	12.6	-2,416.026
	坡向 Aspect	0.153	18.4	-2,425.371
	凹凸度 Convexity	0.193	22.8	-2,441.038
	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate	0.266	29.7	-2,477.055
	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index	0.303	34.0	-2,492.105
	坡度 Slope	0.311	34.9	-2,495.940
	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel	0.328	36.3	-2,506.965
2.5 ≤ DBH < 7.5	海拔 Elevation	0.412	42.1	-1,340.583
	坡向 Aspect	0.432	44.7	-1,348.138
	凹凸度 Convexity	0.462	48.9	-1,360.737
	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate	0.481	51.1	-1,371.831
	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index	0.505	53.1	-1,390.343
	坡度 Slope	0.540	57.6	-1,407.893
	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel	0.540	57.8	-1,410.145
7.5 ≤ DBH < 22.5	海拔 Elevation	0.194	21.0	-448.036
	坡向 Aspect	0.267	29.5	-476.660
	凹凸度 Convexity	0.305	34.4	-490.249
	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate	0.316	36.2	-492.008
	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index	0.334	38.0	-498.367
	坡度 Slope	0.339	38.5	-507.223
	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel	0.381	43.6	-522.046
22.5 ≤ DBH	海拔 Elevation	0.263	27.4	-193.325
	坡向 Aspect	0.321	34.7	-216.574
	凹凸度 Convexity	0.326	35.4	-216.982
	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate	0.335	36.5	-220.844
	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index	0.345	37.8	-225.257
	坡度 Slope	0.392	42.8	-250.109
	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel	0.398	43.7	-251.184

	坡度 Slope (SLO)	凹凸度 Convexity (CON)	坡向 Aspect (ASP)	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index (TWI)	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel (ACH)	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate (RBR)	胸高断面积之和 Total basal area
海拔 Elevation (ELE)	0.578^**	0.466^**	0.052	-0.701^**	0.289^**	0.450^**	-0.147^*
SLO		0.336^**	0.205^*	-0.631^**	0.220^**	0.509^**	-0.080
CON			0.025	-0.564^**	0.518^**	0.300^**	0.051
ASP				-0.098	-0.159^*	0.140^*	0.134^*
TWI					-0.629^**	-0.326^**	0.035
ACH						-0.016	0.083
RBR							0.044

	坡度 Slope (SLO)	凹凸度 Convexity (CON)	坡向 Aspect (ASP)	地形湿润指数Topographic wetness index (TWI)	干旱度指数 Altitude above channel (ACH)	岩石裸露率 Rock-bareness rate (RBR)	胸高断面积之和 Total basal area
海拔 Elevation (ELE)	0.578^**	0.466^**	0.052	-0.701^**	0.289^**	0.450^**	-0.147^*
SLO		0.336^**	0.205^*	-0.631^**	0.220^**	0.509^**	-0.080
CON			0.025	-0.564^**	0.518^**	0.300^**	0.051
ASP				-0.098	-0.159^*	0.140^*	0.134^*
TWI					-0.629^**	-0.326^**	0.035
ACH						-0.016	0.083
RBR							0.044

[1]	杨科, 丁城志, 陈小勇, 丁刘勇, 黄敏睿, 陈晋南, 陶捐. 怒江流域鱼类多样性及空间分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 21334-.
[2]	田璐嘉, 杨小波, 李东海, 李龙, 陈琳, 梁彩群, 张培春, 李晨笛. 海口和三亚两城市破碎化林地中鸟类群落多样性与嵌套分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 21424-.
[3]	刘高慧, 崔建国, 王玥, 王洪良, 香宝, 肖能文. 四川省康定市两栖动物多样性及其时空分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 21494-.
[4]	付飞, 魏慧玉, 常育腾, 王备新, 陈凯. 澜沧江中游水生昆虫生活史和生态学性状多样性的海拔格局: 气候和土地利用的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21332-.
[5]	鲁梦珍, 曾馥平, 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 张浩, 苏樑, 刘坤平, 谭卫宁, 杜虎. 喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶林死亡个体空间分布格局及生境关联[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(4): 21340-.
[6]	付裕, 黄康祥, 蔡锦枫, 陈慧敏, 任久生, 万松泽, 张扬, 任珩, 毛瑢, 石福习. 三江平原沼泽湿地4种优势植物空间格局对不同水位环境的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(3): 21392-.
[7]	王雅婷, 张定海, 张志山. 古尔班通古特沙漠固定沙丘上白梭梭和梭梭的空间分布及种间关联性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(3): 21280-.
[8]	王重阳, 赵联军, 孟世勇. 王朗国家级自然保护区滑坡体兰科植物分布格局及其保护策略[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(2): 21313-.
[9]	孙佳欢, 刘冬, 朱家祺, 张书宁, 高梅香. 小麦–玉米轮作农田土壤螨多样性空间分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(12): 22292-.
[10]	米湘成, 王绪高, 沈国春, 刘徐兵, 宋晓阳, 乔秀娟, 冯刚, 杨洁, 毛子昆, 徐学红, 马克平. 中国森林生物多样性监测网络: 二十年群落构建机制探索的回顾与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(10): 22504-.
[11]	高程, 郭良栋. 微生物物种多样性、群落构建与功能性状研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(10): 22429-.
[12]	张丹, 马松梅, 魏博, 王春成, 张林, 闫涵. 中国梭梭属植物历史分布格局及其驱动机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(1): 21192-.
[13]	郝希阳, 贺姹, 楚克林, 申志新, 赵强, 高伟, 潘达, 孙红英. 海南岛淡水蟹类分布格局与多样性保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(5): 605-616.
[14]	郑进凤, 唐蓉, 贺霜, 陈月红, 伍素, 张凯, 徐雨, 邹晓. 贵州花溪大学城破碎化林地鸟类多样性与嵌套分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(5): 661-667.
[15]	严靖, 闫小玲, 李惠茹, 杜诚, 马金双. 华东地区归化植物的组成特征、引入时间及时空分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(4): 428-438.

喀斯特季节性雨林木本植物胸高断面积分布格局及其对地形因子的响应

Responses of spatial pattern of woody plants’ basal area to topographic factors in a tropical karst seasonal rainforest in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价