生物多样性 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 23359. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023359
王鹏1,2,3, 隋佳容1, 丁欣瑶1, 王伟中1, 曹雪倩1, 赵海鹏1,4,*(), 王彦平5,*()()
收稿日期:
2023-09-26
接受日期:
2023-12-15
出版日期:
2024-03-20
发布日期:
2024-02-27
通讯作者:
*E-mail: hpzhao1980@qq.com;
wangyanping@njnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Peng Wang1,2,3, Jiarong Sui1, Xinyao Ding1, Weizhong Wang1, Xueqian Cao1, Haipeng Zhao1,4,*(), Yanping Wang5,*()()
Received:
2023-09-26
Accepted:
2023-12-15
Online:
2024-03-20
Published:
2024-02-27
Contact:
*E-mail: hpzhao1980@qq.com;
wangyanping@njnu.edu.cn
摘要:
为了探究郑州城市公园鸟类群落是否符合嵌套分布格局及其影响因素, 本研究从中国观鸟记录中心收集了2019-2022年每年3-7月河南省郑州市15个城市公园的鸟类记录数据。使用WNODF (weighted nestedness metric based on overlap and decreasing fill)分别计算郑州城市公园全部鸟类、林鸟和水鸟群落的嵌套分布格局, 采用Spearman偏相关检验分析了公园嵌套序列与公园特征参数(公园面积、隔离度、生境类型数量和建筑指数)的关系, 以及物种嵌套序列与物种生态学特征(体长、地理分布范围、窝卵数和最小面积需求)的关系。WNODF分析结果显示, 郑州城市公园全部鸟类、林鸟和水鸟群落均是显著嵌套的。Spearman偏相关分析结果显示, 公园面积和最小面积需求与鸟类群落嵌套程度显著相关, 生境地点矩阵分析结果显示为显著嵌套, 建筑指数也会影响水鸟群落的嵌套分布格局, 但随机放置模型结果显示城市公园鸟类不符合被动取样假说。因此, 选择性灭绝与生境嵌套是郑州城市公园全部鸟类、林鸟和水鸟群落嵌套分布格局的主要驱动因素。研究结果表明, 为了更好地保护郑州城市公园的鸟类多样性, 应优先保护面积较大和生境类型多的公园, 以及最小面积需求大的鸟类; 同时由于水鸟与林鸟对城市化的反应不同, 在制定保护策略时应区别对待。
王鹏, 隋佳容, 丁欣瑶, 王伟中, 曹雪倩, 赵海鹏, 王彦平 (2024) 郑州城市公园鸟类群落嵌套分布格局及其影响因素. 生物多样性, 32, 23359. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023359.
Peng Wang, Jiarong Sui, Xinyao Ding, Weizhong Wang, Xueqian Cao, Haipeng Zhao, Yanping Wang (2024) Nested distribution patterns of bird assemblages and their influencing factors in Zhengzhou urban parks. Biodiversity Science, 32, 23359. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023359.
图1 郑州市15个城市公园的位置。XS: 须水河滨河公园; HH: 黄河滩; XL: 西流湖; JL: 贾鲁河公园; BS: 碧沙岗公园; ZD: 郑州大学; RM: 人民公园; DF: 东风渠; LH: 龙湖湿地; ZZ: 郑州之林; SX: 索须河; QL: 七里河; LZ: 龙子湖; XH: 象湖湿地; CH: 潮河湿地。
Fig. 1 The location of 15 urban parks in Zhengzhou City, China. XS, Xushui River Riverside Park; HH, Yellow River Beach; XL, Xiliu Lake; JL, Jialu River Park; BS, Bishagang Park; ZD, Zhengzhou University; RM, People’s Park; DF, Dongfeng River; LH, Longhu Wetland; ZZ, Zhengzhou Forest; SX, Suoxu River; QL, Qili River; LZ, Longzi Lake; XH, Xianghu Wetland; CH, Chaohe Wetland.
编号 Code | 名称 Name | 面积 Area (ha) | 隔离度1 Isolation 1 (m) | 隔离度2 Isolation 2 (m) | 生境类型 数量 No. of habitat types | 调查完整度 Survey completeness | 物种数 Species richness | 期望物 种数 Expected richness | 建筑指数 Building index | 全部鸟类 嵌套序列 Nested matrix rank of all birds | 林鸟嵌套 序列 Nested matrix rank of forest birds | 水鸟嵌套序列 Nested matrix rank of water birds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 须水河滨河公园 XS | 17.10 | 2,010 | 18,171 | 4 | 0.92 | 33 | 36.00 | 189 | 14 | 14 | 12 |
2 | 黄河滩 HH | 56.65 | 3,216 | 15,737 | 7 | 0.93 | 108 | 116.25 | 29 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
3 | 西流湖 XL | 60.22 | 3,792 | 11,547 | 7 | 0.86 | 134 | 156.67 | 173 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
4 | 贾鲁河公园 JL | 60.57 | 3,792 | 14,930 | 6 | 0.93 | 83 | 89.86 | 101 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
5 | 碧沙岗公园 BS | 21.71 | 3,792 | 8,994 | 7 | 0.99 | 55 | 54.46 | 204 | 11 | 6 | 15 |
6 | 郑州大学 ZD | 81.60 | 2,010 | 16,178 | 4 | 0.89 | 96 | 107.67 | 269 | 4 | 2 | 13 |
7 | 人民公园 RM | 11.26 | 3,202 | 5,893 | 6 | 0.88 | 37 | 44.50 | 259 | 13 | 12 | 14 |
8 | 东风渠 DF | 30.08 | 3,108 | 2,677 | 2 | 0.84 | 78 | 78.09 | 112 | 6 | 8 | 4 |
9 | 龙湖湿地 LH | 73.33 | 3,108 | 1,048 | 6 | 0.87 | 121 | 138.77 | 95 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
10 | 郑州之林 ZZ | 23.83 | 3,440 | 2,533 | 6 | 0.89 | 69 | 77.75 | 147 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
11 | 索须河 SX | 15.78 | 3,216 | 12,865 | 4 | 0.94 | 53 | 56.50 | 42 | 10 | 10 | 9 |
12 | 七里河 QL | 10.79 | 3,589 | 5,628 | 6 | 0.86 | 19 | 22.00 | 183 | 15 | 15 | 8 |
13 | 龙子湖 LZ | 28.11 | 4,788 | 8,184 | 9 | 0.91 | 56 | 61.50 | 266 | 9 | 11 | 6 |
14 | 象湖湿地 XH | 22.78 | 5,017 | 14,300 | 4 | 0.85 | 40 | 47.00 | 59 | 12 | 13 | 10 |
15 | 潮河湿地 CH | 3.70 | 16,142 | 21,427 | 5 | 0.97 | 68 | 70.33 | 67 | 8 | 9 | 7 |
表1 郑州市15个城市公园的生境变量与特征
Table 1 Habitat variables and characteristics of the 15 urban parks in Zhengzhou City, China
编号 Code | 名称 Name | 面积 Area (ha) | 隔离度1 Isolation 1 (m) | 隔离度2 Isolation 2 (m) | 生境类型 数量 No. of habitat types | 调查完整度 Survey completeness | 物种数 Species richness | 期望物 种数 Expected richness | 建筑指数 Building index | 全部鸟类 嵌套序列 Nested matrix rank of all birds | 林鸟嵌套 序列 Nested matrix rank of forest birds | 水鸟嵌套序列 Nested matrix rank of water birds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 须水河滨河公园 XS | 17.10 | 2,010 | 18,171 | 4 | 0.92 | 33 | 36.00 | 189 | 14 | 14 | 12 |
2 | 黄河滩 HH | 56.65 | 3,216 | 15,737 | 7 | 0.93 | 108 | 116.25 | 29 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
3 | 西流湖 XL | 60.22 | 3,792 | 11,547 | 7 | 0.86 | 134 | 156.67 | 173 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
4 | 贾鲁河公园 JL | 60.57 | 3,792 | 14,930 | 6 | 0.93 | 83 | 89.86 | 101 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
5 | 碧沙岗公园 BS | 21.71 | 3,792 | 8,994 | 7 | 0.99 | 55 | 54.46 | 204 | 11 | 6 | 15 |
6 | 郑州大学 ZD | 81.60 | 2,010 | 16,178 | 4 | 0.89 | 96 | 107.67 | 269 | 4 | 2 | 13 |
7 | 人民公园 RM | 11.26 | 3,202 | 5,893 | 6 | 0.88 | 37 | 44.50 | 259 | 13 | 12 | 14 |
8 | 东风渠 DF | 30.08 | 3,108 | 2,677 | 2 | 0.84 | 78 | 78.09 | 112 | 6 | 8 | 4 |
9 | 龙湖湿地 LH | 73.33 | 3,108 | 1,048 | 6 | 0.87 | 121 | 138.77 | 95 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
10 | 郑州之林 ZZ | 23.83 | 3,440 | 2,533 | 6 | 0.89 | 69 | 77.75 | 147 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
11 | 索须河 SX | 15.78 | 3,216 | 12,865 | 4 | 0.94 | 53 | 56.50 | 42 | 10 | 10 | 9 |
12 | 七里河 QL | 10.79 | 3,589 | 5,628 | 6 | 0.86 | 19 | 22.00 | 183 | 15 | 15 | 8 |
13 | 龙子湖 LZ | 28.11 | 4,788 | 8,184 | 9 | 0.91 | 56 | 61.50 | 266 | 9 | 11 | 6 |
14 | 象湖湿地 XH | 22.78 | 5,017 | 14,300 | 4 | 0.85 | 40 | 47.00 | 59 | 12 | 13 | 10 |
15 | 潮河湿地 CH | 3.70 | 16,142 | 21,427 | 5 | 0.97 | 68 | 70.33 | 67 | 8 | 9 | 7 |
编号 Code | 名称 Name | 建筑 Building | 稀疏树林 Sparse wood | 稠密树林 Dense wood | 池塘 Pond | 湖泊 Lake | 河流 River | 草地 Grassland | 道路设施 Road facility | 灌丛 Shrub | 空地 Bare ground |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 须水河滨河公园 XS | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2 | 黄河滩 HH | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
3 | 西流湖 XL | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
4 | 贾鲁河公园 JL | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
5 | 碧沙岗公园 BS | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
6 | 郑州大学 ZD | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7 | 人民公园 RM | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
8 | 东风渠 DF | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | 龙湖湿地 LH | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
10 | 郑州之林 ZZ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
11 | 索须河 SX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
12 | 七里河 QL | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
13 | 龙子湖 LZ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
14 | 象湖湿地 XH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
15 | 潮河湿地 CH | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
表2 郑州市15个城市公园的生境地点矩阵
Table 2 Habitat-by-site matrix for birds in 15 urban parks in Zhengzhou City, China
编号 Code | 名称 Name | 建筑 Building | 稀疏树林 Sparse wood | 稠密树林 Dense wood | 池塘 Pond | 湖泊 Lake | 河流 River | 草地 Grassland | 道路设施 Road facility | 灌丛 Shrub | 空地 Bare ground |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 须水河滨河公园 XS | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2 | 黄河滩 HH | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
3 | 西流湖 XL | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
4 | 贾鲁河公园 JL | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
5 | 碧沙岗公园 BS | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
6 | 郑州大学 ZD | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7 | 人民公园 RM | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
8 | 东风渠 DF | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | 龙湖湿地 LH | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
10 | 郑州之林 ZZ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
11 | 索须河 SX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
12 | 七里河 QL | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
13 | 龙子湖 LZ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
14 | 象湖湿地 XH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
15 | 潮河湿地 CH | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
图2 郑州市15个城市公园全部鸟类(A)、林鸟(B)和水鸟(C)的物种累积曲线
Fig. 2 Species accumulation curve for all birds (A), forest birds (B) and water birds (C) in 15 urban parks in Zhengzhou City, China
全部鸟类 All birds | 林鸟 Forest birds | 水鸟 Water birds | 栖息地 Habitat | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
观测值Observed | 期望值Expected | P | 观测值Observed | 期望值Expected | P | 观测值Observed | 期望值Expected | P | 观测值Observed | 期望值Expected | P | |
NODF | 51.02 | 76.97 | < 0.001 | 58.10 | 80.09 | < 0.001 | 48.28 | 86.79 | < 0.001 | 59.27 | 21.47 | < 0.001 |
NODFc | 63.66 | 93.68 | < 0.001 | 61.61 | 94.26 | < 0.001 | 68.87 | 92.88 | < 0.001 | 57.48 | 19.81 | < 0.005 |
NODFr | 50.97 | 76.91 | < 0.001 | 58.06 | 79.95 | < 0.001 | 47.30 | 86.51 | < 0.001 | 63.45 | 25.32 | < 0.001 |
WNODF | 33.93 | 68.27 | < 0.001 | 40.67 | 71.31 | < 0.001 | 29.83 | 74.57 | < 0.001 | |||
WNODFc | 41.18 | 80.50 | < 0.001 | 41.97 | 83.33 | < 0.001 | 44.46 | 82.95 | < 0.001 | |||
WNODFr | 33.91 | 68.23 | < 0.001 | 40.66 | 71.20 | < 0.001 | 29.14 | 74.21 | < 0.001 |
表3 NODF软件对郑州市城市公园全部鸟类、林鸟、水鸟群落多度地点矩阵和栖息地地点矩阵嵌套分析的结果
Table 3 Results of nestedness analyses using the software NODF conducted on the species-site abundance matrix for all birds, forest birds and water birds and the habitat-site matrix on 15 urban parks in Zhengzhou City, China
全部鸟类 All birds | 林鸟 Forest birds | 水鸟 Water birds | 栖息地 Habitat | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
观测值Observed | 期望值Expected | P | 观测值Observed | 期望值Expected | P | 观测值Observed | 期望值Expected | P | 观测值Observed | 期望值Expected | P | |
NODF | 51.02 | 76.97 | < 0.001 | 58.10 | 80.09 | < 0.001 | 48.28 | 86.79 | < 0.001 | 59.27 | 21.47 | < 0.001 |
NODFc | 63.66 | 93.68 | < 0.001 | 61.61 | 94.26 | < 0.001 | 68.87 | 92.88 | < 0.001 | 57.48 | 19.81 | < 0.005 |
NODFr | 50.97 | 76.91 | < 0.001 | 58.06 | 79.95 | < 0.001 | 47.30 | 86.51 | < 0.001 | 63.45 | 25.32 | < 0.001 |
WNODF | 33.93 | 68.27 | < 0.001 | 40.67 | 71.31 | < 0.001 | 29.83 | 74.57 | < 0.001 | |||
WNODFc | 41.18 | 80.50 | < 0.001 | 41.97 | 83.33 | < 0.001 | 44.46 | 82.95 | < 0.001 | |||
WNODFr | 33.91 | 68.23 | < 0.001 | 40.66 | 71.20 | < 0.001 | 29.14 | 74.21 | < 0.001 |
生境变量 Habitat variable | 物种生态学特征 Species ecological traits | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (ha) | 隔离度1 Isolation 1 (m) | 隔离度2 Isolation 2 (m) | 生境类型的数量 No. of habitat types | 建筑指数Building index | 体长 Body length (mm) | 地理分布范围Geographic range size (km2) | 窝卵数Clutch size | 最小面积需求Minimum area requirement (ha) | |
全部鸟类 All birds | -0.909** | -0.600 | 0.446 | -0.112 | 0.428 | -0.093 | -0.055 | 0.095 | 0.735** |
林鸟 Forest birds | -0.817* | -0.386 | 0.293 | -0.100 | 0.081 | -0.135 | -0.109 | 0.042 | 0.739** |
水鸟 Water birds | -0.609* | -0.325 | 0.427 | -0.323 | 0.650* | -0.049 | -0.164 | 0.192 | 0.664** |
表4 NODF软件重排后地点的嵌套序列与生境变量的Spearman偏相关分析结果以及NODF软件重排后物种的嵌套序列与物种生态学特征的Spearman偏相关分析结果
Table 4 Results of partial Spearman rank correlations between rank orders of sites and species in the maximally nested matrix using the software NODF and orders of sites and species after rearranging the matrix according to each explanatory variable
生境变量 Habitat variable | 物种生态学特征 Species ecological traits | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (ha) | 隔离度1 Isolation 1 (m) | 隔离度2 Isolation 2 (m) | 生境类型的数量 No. of habitat types | 建筑指数Building index | 体长 Body length (mm) | 地理分布范围Geographic range size (km2) | 窝卵数Clutch size | 最小面积需求Minimum area requirement (ha) | |
全部鸟类 All birds | -0.909** | -0.600 | 0.446 | -0.112 | 0.428 | -0.093 | -0.055 | 0.095 | 0.735** |
林鸟 Forest birds | -0.817* | -0.386 | 0.293 | -0.100 | 0.081 | -0.135 | -0.109 | 0.042 | 0.739** |
水鸟 Water birds | -0.609* | -0.325 | 0.427 | -0.323 | 0.650* | -0.049 | -0.164 | 0.192 | 0.664** |
图3 郑州市城市公园全部鸟类(A)、林鸟(B)和水鸟(C)群落随机放置模型的观测值与期望值比较。期望值(实线)和标准差(±1SD; 虚线)。黑色圆点代表观察到的物种丰富度。
Fig. 3 Comparison of observed data to expected values under the random placement models for all birds (A), forest birds (B) and waterbirds (C) in 15 urban parks in Zhengzhou City, China. Expected values (solid line) and associated standard deviations (±1SD; dashed lines) are shown. The black dots represent observed species richness.
[1] | Almeida-Neto M, Guimarães P, Guimarães PR Jr, Loyola RD, Ulrich W (2008) A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: Reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos, 117, 1227-1239. |
[2] | Almeida-Neto M, Ulrich W (2011) A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, 173-178. |
[3] | Andrén H (1994) Can one use nested subset pattern to reject the random sample hypothesis? Examples from boreal bird communities. Oikos, 70, 489-491. |
[4] | Bolger DT, Scott TA, Rotenberry JT (1997) Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal Southern California. Conservation Biology, 11, 406-421. |
[5] | Brodie JF, Mohd-Azlan J, Chen C, Wearn OR, Deith MCM, Ball JGC, Slade EM, Burslem DFRP, Teoh SW, Williams PJ, Nguyen A, Moore JH, Goetz SJ, Burns P, Jantz P, Hakkenberg CR, Kaszta ZM, Cushman S, Coomes D, Helmy OE, Reynolds G, Rodríguez JP, Jetz W, Luskin MS (2023) Landscape-scale benefits of protected areas for tropical biodiversity. Nature, 620, 807-812. |
[6] | Cai EX, Kou ZW, Meng K, Zhang Y, Hou HP (2022) Spatio-temporal characteristics of urban expansion in Zhengzhou from 1990 to 2020. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 56, 674-684. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 蔡恩香, 寇紫薇, 孟珂, 张杨, 侯贺平 (2022) 1990-2020年郑州城市扩张时空特征分析. 河南农业大学学报, 56, 674-684.] | |
[7] | Callaghan CT, Bowler DE, Blowes SA, Chase JM, Lyons MB, Pereira HM (2022) Quantifying effort needed to estimate species diversity from citizen science data. Ecosphere, 13, e3966. |
[8] |
Calmé S, Desrochers A (1999) Nested bird and micro-habitat assemblages in a peatland archipelago. Oecologia, 118, 361-370.
DOI PMID |
[9] |
Cazalis V, Princé K, Mihoub JB, Kelly J, Butchart SHM, Rodrigues ASL (2020) Effectiveness of protected areas in conserving tropical forest birds. Nature Communications, 11, 4461.
DOI PMID |
[10] | Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74, 46-69. |
[11] |
Chao A, Jost L (2012) Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: Standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology, 93, 2533-2547.
DOI PMID |
[12] | Chen CW, Zhan CX, Wang YP (2022) Do functional and phylogenetic nestedness follow the same mechanisms as taxonomic nestedness? Evidence from amphibians in the largest archipelago of China. Journal of Animal Ecology, 91, 2424-2436. |
[13] | Coleman BD (1981) On random placement and species-area relations. Mathematical Biosciences, 54, 191-215. |
[14] | Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology, 85, 2717-2727. |
[15] |
Cook RR, Quinn JF (1995) The influence of colonization in nested species subsets. Oecologia, 102, 413-424.
DOI PMID |
[16] | Cutler AH (1994) Nested biotas and biological conservation: Metrics, mechanisms, and meaning of nestedness. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28, 73-82. |
[17] | Darlington PJ (1957) Zoogeography:The Geographical Distribution of Animals. John Wiley and Sons, New York. |
[18] | Duan HL, Yu XB, Xia SX, Liu Y (2022) Conserving unprotected important sites for shorebirds on China’s coasts. Ecosphere, 13, e3950. |
[19] | Evans BS, Ryder TB, Reitsma R, Hurlbert AH, Marra PP (2015) Characterizing avian survival along a rural-to-urban land use gradient. Ecology, 96, 1631-1640. |
[20] |
Fernández-Juricic E (2002) Can human disturbance promote nestedness? A case study with breeding birds in urban habitat fragments. Oecologia, 131, 269-278.
DOI PMID |
[21] |
Fleishman E, Betrus CJ, Blair RB, Mac Nally R, Murphy DD (2002) Nestedness analysis and conservation planning: The importance of place, environment, and life history across taxonomic groups. Oecologia, 133, 78-89.
DOI PMID |
[22] | Fleishman E, Donnelly R, Fay JP, Reeves R (2007) Applications of nestedness analyses to biodiversity conservation in developing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 271-281. |
[23] | Ganzhorn JU, Eisenbeiß B (2001) The concept of nested species assemblages and its utility for understanding effects of habitat fragmentation. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2, 87-99. |
[24] | González-Oreja JA, De La Fuente-Díaz AA, Hernández-Santín L, Bonache-Regidor C, Buzo-Franco D (2012) Can human disturbance promote nestedness? Songbirds and noise in urban parks as a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104, 9-18. |
[25] | Green DM, Baker MG (2003) Urbanization impacts on habitat and bird communities in a Sonoran desert ecosystem. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63, 225-239. |
[26] | Higgins CL, Willig MR, Strauss RE (2006) The role of stochastic processes in producing nested patterns of species distributions. Oikos, 114, 159-167. |
[27] | Honnay O, Hermy M, Coppin P (1999) Nested plant communities in deciduous forest fragments: Species relaxation or nested habitats? Oikos, 84, 119-129. |
[28] |
Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Rubio E, Benedetti Y, Morelli F (2017) Global loss of avian evolutionary uniqueness in urban areas. Global Change Biology, 23, 2990-2998.
DOI PMID |
[29] |
Ji YR, Wei XL, Zhang GF, Xiang MG, Wang YC, Gong RH, Hu Y, Li DQ, Liu F (2022) Diversity and composition of bird species in the Hubei Wufeng Houhe National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science, 30, 21475. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 姬云瑞, 韦雪蕾, 张国锋, 向明贵, 王永超, 龚仁琥, 胡杨, 李迪强, 刘芳 (2022) 湖北五峰后河国家级自然保护区鸟类多样性. 生物多样性, 30, 21475.]
DOI |
|
[30] | Li CL, Zhao BB, Wang YP (2019) Nestedness of waterbird assemblages in the subsidence wetlands recently created by underground coal mining. Current Zoology, 65, 155-163. |
[31] |
Li YM, Niemelä J, Li DM (1998) Nested distribution of amphibians in the Zhoushan Archipelago, China: Can selective extinction cause nested subsets of species? Oecologia, 113, 557-564.
DOI PMID |
[32] | Lomolino MV (1996) Investigating causality of nestedness of insular communities: Selective immigrations or extinctions? Journal of Biogeography, 23, 699-703. |
[33] | MacKinnon J, Phillipps K, He FQ (2000) A Field Guide to the Birds of China. Hunan Education Press, Changsha. (in Chinese) |
[ 约翰·马敬能, 卡伦·菲利普斯, 何芬奇 (2000) 中国鸟类野外手册. 湖南教育出版社, 长沙.] | |
[34] | Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (2001) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell. |
[35] | McAbendroth L, Foggo A, Rundle SD, Bilton DT (2005) Unravelling nestedness and spatial pattern in pond assemblages. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 41-49. |
[36] |
McDonnell MJ, MacGregor-Fors L (2016) The ecological future of cities. Science, 352, 936-938.
DOI PMID |
[37] | Meyer CFJ, Kalko EKV (2008) Bat assemblages on neotropical land-bridge islands: Nested subsets and null model analyses of species co-occurrence patterns. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 644-654. |
[38] | Murgui E (2010) Seasonality and nestedness of bird communities in urban parks in Valencia, Spain. Ecography, 33, 979-984. |
[39] | Patterson BD, Atmar W (1986) Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 28, 65-82. |
[40] | Schouten MA, Verweij PA, Barendregt A, Kleukers RJM, De Ruiter PC, (2007) Nested assemblages of Orthoptera species in the Netherlands: The importance of habitat features and life-history traits. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 1938-1946. |
[41] | Soulé ME, Bolger DT, Alberts AC, Wrights J, Sorice M, Hill S (1988) Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral-requiring birds in urban habitat islands. Conservation Biology, 2, 75-92. |
[42] | Sun B, Lu YL, Yang YF, Yu MZ, Yuan JJ, Yu R, Bullock JM, Stenseth NC, Li X, Cao ZW, Lei HJ, Li JL (2022) Urbanization affects spatial variation and species similarity of bird diversity distribution. Science Advances, 8, eade3061. |
[43] | Tan XW, Yang XR, Chen CW, Wang YP (2021) Nestedness and underlying processes of bird assemblages in Nanjing urban parks. Current Zoology, 67, 383-392. |
[44] | Wang YP, Bao YX, Yu MJ, Xu GF, Ding P (2010) Biodiversity research: Nestedness for different reasons: The distributions of birds, lizards and small mammals on islands of an inundated lake. Diversity and Distributions, 16, 862-873. |
[45] | Wang YP, Ding P, Chen SH, Zheng GM (2013) Nestedness of bird assemblages on urban woodlots: Implications for conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 111, 59-67. |
[46] | Wang YP, Si XF, Bennett PM, Chen CW, Zeng D, Zhao YH, Wu YR, Ding P (2018) Ecological correlates of extinction risk in Chinese birds. Ecography, 41, 782-794. |
[47] | Wang YP, Wang X, Ding P (2012) Nestedness of snake assemblages on islands of an inundated lake. Current Zoology, 58, 828-836. |
[48] |
Wang YP, Zhang MC, Zhan CX (2023) A review on the nested distribution pattern (nestedness): Analysis methods, mechanisms and conservation implications. Biodiversity Science, 31, 23314. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
[ 王彦平, 张敏楚, 詹成修 (2023) 嵌套分布格局研究进展: 分析方法、影响机制及保护应用. 生物多样性, 31, 23314.]
DOI |
|
[49] | Weiher E, Keddy P (1999) Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |
[50] | Whittaker RJ, Fernandez-Palacios JM (2007) Island Biogeography: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford. |
[51] | Worthen WB, Jones MT, Jetton RM (1998) Community structure and environmental stress: Desiccation promotes nestedness in mycophagous fly communities. Oikos, 81, 45-54. |
[52] | Wright DH, Patterson BD, Mikkelson GM, Cutler A, Atmar W (1998) A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oecologia, 113, 1-20. |
[53] | Xu AC, Han XF, Zhang XM, Millien V, Wang YP (2017) Nestedness of butterfly assemblages in the Zhoushan Archipelago, China: Area effects, life-history traits and conservation implications. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, 1375-1392. |
[54] | Yao XZ, Wang XY, Hu YG, Chen YY, He PF, Tian GX (2021) Study on diversity of herbaceous plants along the Yellow River Wetland in Zhengzhou City. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 49(1), 186-191. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 姚新治, 王鑫宇, 胡永歌, 陈延永, 何鹏飞, 田国行 (2021) 郑州沿黄湿地草本植物群落多样性研究. 江苏农业科学, 49(1), 186-191.] | |
[55] | Zhan CX, Li BC, Chen CW, Wang YP (2024) Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional nestedness of mammal assemblages in the Zhoushan Archipelago, China. Current Zoology, zoae006, 1-11. |
[56] | Zhang JB, Zhu HR, Zhang PY, Song YP, Zhang Y, Li YY, Rong TQ, Liu ZY, Yang D, Lou YY (2022) Construction of GI network based on MSPA and PLUS model in the main urban area of Zhengzhou: A case study. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 878656. |
[57] | Zhang MC, Tang CN, Zhang Q, Zhan CX, Chen CW, Wang YP (2024) Selective extinction and habitat nestedness are the main drivers of lizard nestedness in the Zhoushan Archipelago. Current Zoology, 70, 244-252. |
[58] | Zheng GM (2017) A Checklist on the Classification and Distribution of the Birds of China, 3rd edn. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 郑光美 (2017) 中国鸟类分类与分布名录(第三版). 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[59] | Zhong YX, Chen CW, Wang YP (2022) Biological and extrinsic correlates of extinction risk in Chinese lizards. Current Zoology, 68, 285-293. |
[1] | 李柏灿, 张军国, 张长春, 王丽凤, 徐基良, 刘利. 基于TC-YOLO模型的北京珍稀鸟类识别方法[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 24056-. |
[2] | 李斌, 宋鹏飞, 顾海峰, 徐波, 刘道鑫, 江峰, 梁程博, 张萌, 高红梅, 蔡振媛, 张同作. 昆仑山青海片区鸟类群落多样性格局及其驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23406-. |
[3] | 吴相獐, 雷富民, 单壹壹, 于晶. 上海城市公园苔藓植物多样性分布格局及其环境影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23364-. |
[4] | 王丽媛, 胡慧建, 姜杰, 胡一鸣. 南岭哺乳类和鸟类物种丰富度空间分布格局及其影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23026-. |
[5] | 李发扬, 李滢钰, 蒋文妮, 刘曙光, 霍超, 孙巧奇, 邹红菲. 火后恢复时间影响大兴安岭寒温带森林内部与边缘鸟类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22665-. |
[6] | 殷鲁秦, 王成, 韩文静. 基于取食行为探究北京居民区鸟类的食源特征及多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22473-. |
[7] | 陈晓澄, 张鹏展, 康斌, 刘林山, 赵亮. 基于中国科学院西北高原生物研究所馆藏标本分析青藏高原雀形目鸟类物种和功能多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22638-. |
[8] | 陈本平, 陈建武, 凌征文, 杨旭, 陈鑫, 李生强, 杨彪. 四川老君山国家级自然保护区林下鸟兽多样性及动态变化数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22566-. |
[9] | 赵也茜, 张家语, 李子涵, 解秦米佳, 邓歆, 王楠. 北京城市鸟类夜栖时对本土和外来植物的利用[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22399-. |
[10] | 张琼悦, 邓卓迪, 胡学斌, 丁志锋, 肖荣波, 修晨, 吴政浩, 汪光, 韩东晖, 张语克, 梁健超, 胡慧建. 粤港澳大湾区城市化进程对区域内鸟类分布及栖息地连通性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22161-. |
[11] | 申小虎, 朱翔宇, 史洪飞, 王传之. 基于机器学习鸟声识别算法研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23272-. |
[12] | 边琦, 王成, 程贺, 韩丹, 赵伊琳, 殷鲁秦. 声学指数在城市森林鸟类多样性评估中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22080-. |
[13] | 汪婷, 周立志. 合肥市小微湿地鸟类多样性的时空格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 21445-. |
[14] | 张敏, 田春坡, 车先丽, 赵岩岩, 陈什旺, 周霞, 邹发生. 广东省鸟类新记录及其与自然和社会经济因素的关联性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21396-. |
[15] | 李家兴, 周丽萍, 孙家杰, 谭筱彩, 蒋爱伍. 广西山地农业化背景下鸟类多样性比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21515-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn