生物多样性

• •    下一篇

利用几何形态学探究海拔梯度对广东车八岭菌食性甲虫形态的影响

门德, 李盼盼, 路园园, 佟一杰, 王新谱, 白明   

  1. 宁夏大学农学院, 750021
    中国科学院动物研究所动物多样性保护与有害动物防控全国重点实验室, 100101
    广西大学农学院广西农业环境与农产品安全重点实验室,植物科学国家级实验教学示范中心, 530004
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-10 修回日期:2026-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 白明

Using geometric morphometrics to investigate the effect of altitudinal gradient on the morphology of fungivorous beetles in Chebaling, Guangdong, China

Mende Borjigin, PanPan Li, YuanYuan Lu, Yijie Tong, Xinpu Wang, Ming Bai   

  1. , School of Agriculture, Ningxia University 750021,
    , State Key Laboratory of Animal Biodiversity Conservation and Integrated Pest Management, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 100101,
    , Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agric-products Safety, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University 530004,
  • Received:2026-03-10 Revised:2026-06-05
  • Contact: Ming Bai

摘要: 通过对分布于广东车八岭不同海拔地区的三类隶属于朵窃蠹属Dorcatoma、小蕈甲属Mycetophagus和卵姬蕈甲属Aspidiphorus的菌食性甲虫的连续性特征代表:前胸背板和鞘翅的定量形态评估,探讨不同海拔高度下甲虫形态适应性变化,揭示甲虫形态变化与环境因素的关系。基于几何形态学,量化三类甲虫样本前胸背板和鞘翅的左侧外轮廓形态信息,采用主成分分析和典型变量分析,探讨不同海拔地区甲虫形态的差异,并通过传统体型测量方法评估体型变化趋势。不同海拔梯度下甲虫类群形态特征存在显著差异,其中鞘翅形态的差异较前胸背板更为突出。三类甲虫前胸背板和鞘翅的形变趋势在不同类群之间存在差异,Dorcatoma spp.前胸背板和鞘翅形态均受海拔影响,且鞘翅形态在海拔梯度Ⅲ区域窄长化;Mycetophagus spp.前胸背板形态未表现出显著的海拔梯度效应,而鞘翅形态则随海拔变化呈显著差异;而Aspidiphorus spp.前胸背板和鞘翅形态均未表现出显著的海拔梯度效应。传统体型测量揭示,只有Aspidiphorus spp.的体长存在显著海拔差异,Dorcatoma spp.和Mycetophagus spp.的体型保持稳定。海拔梯度是影响甲虫前胸背板和鞘翅形态变化的重要生态因素之一,但其作用模式在不同物种间存在差异。本研究从形态学角度揭示了生态梯度对昆虫形态变异与潜在适应性演化的影响,为理解动物形态演化的生态驱动机制提供了新的证据与研究视角。

关键词: 生态因素, 形态演化, 海拔梯度, 甲虫, 几何形态学

Abstract

Aims: By conducting a quantitative morphological assessment of continuous characters—specifically the pronotum and elytron—of three fungivorous beetle taxa belonging to the genera Dorcatoma, Mycetophagus, and Aspidiphorus distributed across different altitudinal zones in the Chebaling National Nature Reserve, Guangdong Province, this study investigates the adaptive morphological changes of beetles along an altitudinal gradient and elucidates the relationship between morphological variation and environmental factors. 

Methods: Based on geometric morphometrics, the left outline of the pronotum and elytron of three beetle taxa was quantified. Principal component analysis and canonical variate analysis were employed to investigate morphological differences among beetle populations from different altitudinal regions, while traditional body size measurements were used to assess patterns of body size variation. 

Results: Morphological traits of beetle assemblages differed significantly across altitudinal gradients, with variation in elytron shape being more pronounced than that of the pronotum. The deformation patterns of the pronotum and elytron differed among the three beetle taxa. In Dorcatoma spp., both pronotum and elytron shapes were significantly influenced by altitude, and the elytron became narrower and more elongated at Altitudinal Gradient III. In Mycetophagus spp., pronotum shape showed no significant altitudinal effect, whereas elytron shape varied significantly across altitudinal gradients. In contrast, neither pronotum nor elytron shape in Aspidiphorus spp. showed significant responses to altitude. Traditional morphometric analyses further revealed that only the body length of Aspidiphorus spp. differed significantly among altitudinal gradients, whereas body size remained relatively stable in Dorcatoma spp. and Mycetophagus spp. 

Conclusion: Altitudinal gradient is a significant ecological factor influencing the morphological changes of the pronotum and elytron in beetles. However, its effect varies among species. This study provides new empirical evidence from a morphological perspective, highlighting the impact of ecological gradients on insect morphological variation and potential adaptive evolution, thus offering fresh insights into the ecological drivers of animal morphology evolution.

Key words: Ecological factors, morphological evolution, elevation gradients, beetles, geometric morphometrics