生物多样性 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 24478.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024478

• • 上一篇    下一篇

生态修复技术集成应用对长江口北支生境与鸟类多样性提升效果评估

徐欢1#, 辛凤飞1#, 施宏亮2, 袁琳3,4, 薄顺奇5, 赵欣怡6, 邓帅涛1, 潘婷婷1, 余婧1, 孙赛赛1, 薛程1,7*   

  1. 1. 上海市野生动植物和自然保护地研究中心, 上海 200336; 2. 上海市崇明区林业站, 上海 202150; 3. 华东师范大学/河口海岸全国重点实验室/崇明生态研究院/蓝碳科学与技术研究中心, 上海 200241; 4. 长江三角洲河口湿地生态系统教育部/上海市野外科学观测研究站, 上海 202162; 5. 上海市林业局, 上海 200040; 6. 上海鸥憩生态环境科技有限公司; 7. 上海市园林科学规划研究院, 上海 201801
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-31 修回日期:2025-02-07 接受日期:2025-05-29 出版日期:2025-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 薛程

Evaluation of effects of integrated ecological restoration technology on habitat and bird diversity improvement in the northern branch of Yangtze River Estuary

Huan Xu1#, Fengfei Xin1#, Hongliang Shi2, Lin Yuan3,4, Shunqi Bo5, Xinyi Zhao6, Shuaitao Deng1, Tingting Pan1, Jing Yu1, Saisai Sun1, Cheng Xue1,7*   

  1. 1 Shanghai Wildlife and Protected Natural Areas Research Center, Shanghai 200336, China 

    2 Shanghai Chongming District Forestry Station, Shanghai 202150, China 

    3 East China Normal University, State Key laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, Institute of Eco-Chongming, Center for Blue Carbon Science and Technology, Shanghai 200241, China 

    4 Yangtze Delte Estuarine Wetland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station/Ministry of Education & Shanghai Science and Technology Committee, Shanghai 202162, China 

    5 Shanghai Forestry Bureau, Shanghai 200040, China 

    6 Shanghai Ouqi Ecological Environment Technology Co., Ltd. 

    7 Shanghai Academy of Landscape Architecture Science and Planning, Shanghai 201801, China

  • Received:2024-10-31 Revised:2025-02-07 Accepted:2025-05-29 Online:2025-05-20
  • Contact: Cheng Xue

摘要: 开展河口湿地修复并探究修复技术对栖息生境与鸟类多样性的影响是城市生物多样性保护与可持续利用的重要一环, 也是践行《中国生物多样性保护战略与行动计划(2023‒2030)》与履行联合国《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》的重要内容。本研究以长江口北支为研究区域, 通过对比分析当前区域内存在的生态环境问题提出了针对性的修复方案, 开展了集成的生态修复技术应用。在生态修复工程结束后结合机器学习与野外调查的方法, 评估生态修复后长江口生境以及鸟类多样性与环境受损前的恢复程度。本研究表明互花米草(Spartina alterniflora)治理、光滩营造、潮沟构建及本土盐沼植被群落恢复是提升河口湿地生境异质性、增加鸟类多样性的关键手段。生态修复后互花米草治理面积为12.97 ha, 芦苇(Phragmites communis)植被群落恢复面积9.15 ha, 潮沟构建长度为600 m; 芦苇种植区的鸟类多样性恢复情况最好, 冬季和春季时的鸟类种数、数量和多样性指数均超过了2018年时生态未受损的水平, 最高记录到鸟类18种178只次; 潮沟营造区春季时的鸟类多样性已恢复至原先的水平, 最高记录到13种68只次; 互花米草治理区的鸟类多样性恢复情况还与原先的水平有一定差距, 最高记录到鸟类13种68只次。本研究比较并揭示了不同修复技术对河口湿地生境及鸟类多样性提升的效果, 通过与国内外的生态修复工程开展对比分析, 将为我国开展后续生态修复提供经验借鉴, 并为退化河口湿地开展集成修复后的系统性生物多样性评价、城市生物多样性保护与可持续利用提供科学支撑。

关键词: 生态修复技术集成, 鸟类多样性, 生境, 长江口北支, 互花米草

Abstract

Aims: The restoration of estuarine wetlands and the assessment of how restoration techniques impact habitat and bird diversity are essential for urban biodiversity conservation and sustainable use. This aligns with the objectives of the China Biodiversity Conservation Strategy and Action Plan (2023–2030) and contributes to the implementation of the United Nations’ Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. By integrating machine learning with field surveys, this study evaluates the effects of various ecological restoration techniques on habitat conditions and bird diversity before and after restoration in the northern branch of the Yangtze River Estuary. 

Methods: By comparing and analyzing existing ecological and environmental problems in the study area, targeted restoration plans were developed, and integrated ecological restoration technologies were implemented. After project completion, we employed machine learning and field investigation methods to assess the restoration status of the Yangtze River Estuary habitat and bird diversity, comparing conditions before environmental degradation and after ecological restoration. 

Results: The findings indicate that Spartina alterniflora control, mudflat construction, tidal creek construction, and native salt marsh vegetation restoration are key methods for enhancing habitat heterogeneity and increasing avian diversity in estuarine wetlands. Specifically, Spartina alterniflora control and mudflat creation cover 12.97 hectares. Reed (Phragmites communis) vegetation restoration covered 13.5 hectares. Tidal creek measures extended 600 meters in length. Bird diversity in reed planting areas showed the greatest recovery, with species richness, abundance, and diversity indices in winter and spring exceeding those recorded in 2018 before ecological degradation. The highest record included 18 species and 178 individuals. In tidal creek construction areas, spring bird diversity recovered to pre-degradation levels, with a maximum of 13 species and 68 individuals recorded. Spartina alterniflora control areas showed a slower recovery of bird diversity, with a maximum of 13 species and 68 individuals recorded, still lagging behind pre-degradation levels. 

Conclusions: This study compares and evaluates the effects of various restoration techniques on estuarine wetland habitat and bird diversity enhancement. By conducting a comparative analysis of domestic and international restoration projects, this study offers valuable experiences and references for future restoration efforts in China. Furthermore, it provides scientific support for the systematic biodiversity assessment, urban biodiversity conservation, and sustainable use of degraded estuarine wetlands following integrated ecological restoration.

Key words: Ecological restoration technology integration, bird diversity, habitat, north branch of the Yangtze River Estuary, Spartina alterniflora