福建省明溪县黑冠鹃隼生境适宜性

doi:10.17520/biods.2022660

生物多样性 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 22660. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022660

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

福建省明溪县黑冠鹃隼生境适宜性

刘伟¹, 王濡格¹, 范天巧¹, 娜依曼·阿不都力江¹, 宋新航¹, 肖书平², 郭宁³, 帅凌鹰⁴^,^*()

1.河南师范大学生命科学学院, 河南新乡 453000
2.明溪县林业局, 福建三明 365000
3.福建省野生动植物保护中心, 福州 350000
4.淮北师范大学生命科学学院, 安徽淮北 235000

收稿日期:2022-11-25 接受日期:2023-04-24 出版日期:2023-07-20 发布日期:2023-06-16
通讯作者: *E-mail: shuailingying@163.com
作者简介:*E-mail: shuailingying@163.com
基金资助:
明溪县国家重点保护野生动物黑冠鹃隼和鸳鸯调查监测项目(HZ2022013)

Habitat suitability for the Aviceda leuphotes in Mingxi County, Fujian Province

Wei Liu¹, Ruge Wang¹, Tianqiao Fan¹, Nayiman Abudulijiang¹, Xinhang Song¹, Shuping Xiao², Ning Guo³, Lingying Shuai⁴^,^*()

1. College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan 453000
2. Mingxi Forestry Bureau, Sanming, Fujian 365000
3. Wildlife Protection Center of Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350000
4. College of Life Sciences, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, Anhui 235000

Received:2022-11-25 Accepted:2023-04-24 Online:2023-07-20 Published:2023-06-16
Contact: *E-mail: shuailingying@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

黑冠鹃隼(Aviceda leuphotes)是我国国家二级重点保护野生动物, 也是多地观鸟产业的明星物种。然而, 目前关于黑冠鹃隼的生态学研究非常稀缺, 极大限制了我们对该物种采取针对性的保护措施。有鉴于此, 本研究结合福建省明溪县林业局前期鸟类记录, 于当地选择了32个样地开展实际调查, 其中16个观测到黑冠鹃隼。基于上述样地的气候与地理特征, 我们利用地理信息系统(geographic information system, GIS)、最大熵(maximum entropy, MaxEnt)模型和广义线性模型(generalized linear model, GLM)对黑冠鹃隼的生境利用特征进行了分析, 并预测了该县域内黑冠鹃隼的潜在适宜生境分布, 以期为黑冠鹃隼的保护工作提供理论依据。MaxEnt建模结果表明: (1)土地利用类型是限制黑冠鹃隼分布的最主要环境变量, 其中耕地和湿地类型的分布是重要的影响因子; (2)黑冠鹃隼分布也受到距道路距离和归一化植被指数的影响。GLM分析结果表明距道路距离对黑冠鹃隼的分布有显著影响。综上, 黑冠鹃隼更偏好土地利用类型为耕地或湿地、离道路较远、归一化植被指数较低的生境。

关键词: 黑冠鹃隼, 明溪县, 最大熵模型, 广义线性模型, 适宜生境

Abstract

Aims: Aviceda leuphotes is a second-class protected animal in China and a flagship species for birdwatching in many places. However, at present, the ecological research on A. leuphotes is very scarce, which significantly hinders our ability to implement targeted protection measures for this species. To address this issue, we conducted the study to analyze the characteristics of suitable habitats for the A. leuphotes and to predict potential suitable habitats in Mingxi County, Fujian Province, in order to provide a theoretical foundation for the conservation of the species.

Methods: In this study, 32 sample plots were selected for field survey by combining the initial records provided by the Mingxi Forestry Bureau, Fujian Province. Aviceda leuphotes were recorded in 16 sample plots. Using geographic information system (GIS), maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model, and generalized linear model (GLM), we analyzed the habitat suitability of A. leuphotes in Mingxi County, taking into account the climatic and geographic characteristics of each site.

Results: The results of the MaxEnt modeling showed that: (1) Land-use type was the most significant environmental factor restricting the distribution of the species, with cultivated land and wetland serving as the species' preferred habitats. (2) In addition, the distribution of A. leuphotes was influenced by the distance from road, as well as the normalized difference vegetation index. The results of the GLM also showed that the distance from road has a significant effect on the distribution of A. leuphotes.

Conclusion: Aviceda leuphotes preferred the habitat with cultivated land or wetland, far away from the road and low normalized difference vegetation index.

Key words: Aviceda leuphotes, Mingxi County, MaxEnt model, generalized linear model, suitable habitat

刘伟, 王濡格, 范天巧, 娜依曼·阿不都力江, 宋新航, 肖书平, 郭宁, 帅凌鹰 (2023) 福建省明溪县黑冠鹃隼生境适宜性. 生物多样性, 31, 22660. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022660.

Wei Liu, Ruge Wang, Tianqiao Fan, Nayiman Abudulijiang, Xinhang Song, Shuping Xiao, Ning Guo, Lingying Shuai (2023) Habitat suitability for the Aviceda leuphotes in Mingxi County, Fujian Province. Biodiversity Science, 31, 22660. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022660.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2022660

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2023/V31/I7/22660

图/表 6

参考文献 21

[1]	Bao XK, Liao JC, Bao WD (2019) Black baza (Aviceda leuphotes) found in the southeast of Gansu Province, China. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 54, 492. (in Chinese)
	[包新康, 廖继承, 包卫东 (2019) 甘肃东南部发现黑冠鹃隼. 动物学杂志, 54, 492.]
[2]	Barton K (2023) MuMIn: Multi-model inference, R package version 1.47.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn. (accessed on 2022-11-15)
[3]	Donázar JA, Cortés-Avizanda A, Fargallo JA, Margalida A, Moleón M, Morales-Reyes Z, Moreno-Opo R, Pérez-García JM, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Zuberogoitia I, Serrano D (2016) Roles of raptors in a changing world: From flagships to providers of key ecosystem services. Ardeola, 63, 181-234. DOI URL
[4]	Gong YY, Jia XX, Zhu QQ, Yang YB, Liu G (2018) Potential distribution of Ipomoea cairica in China under climate change. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 46(6), 115-123. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[龚岩岩, 贾晓霞, 朱倩倩, 杨瑛博, 刘刚 (2018) 气候变化背景下五爪金龙在中国的潜在适生区预测. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 46(6), 115-123.]
[5]	Hu XL, Geng DM (1995) Black baza (Aviceda leuphotes) found in Anhui. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 30(5), 24-25. (in Chinese)
	[胡小龙, 耿德民 (1995) 安徽发现黑冠鹃隼. 动物学杂志, 30(5), 24-25.]
[6]	Kang ZJ, He CR, Yu GQ, Yang CC, Zhang FM, Yi JF, Liu W, Tian YX, Wang CL (2020) Diversity and fauna characteristics of breeding birds in Hunan Xiaoxi National Nature Reserve, China. International Journal of Ecology, 9, 310-323. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[康祖杰, 贺春容, 于桂清, 杨存存, 张法明, 伊剑锋, 刘威, 田永祥, 汪承龙 (2020) 湖南小溪国家级自然保护区繁殖鸟类多样性与区系特征. 世界生态学, 9, 310-323.]
[7]	Kumar S, Sohil A, Kichloo MA, Sharma N (2022) Landscape heterogeneity affects diurnal raptor communities in a sub-tropical region of northwestern Himalayas, India. PLoS ONE, 17, e0246555.
[8]	Lu CH, Lei M, Zhang Y (2010) Black baza (Aviceda leuphotes) and White-throated Kingfisher (Halcyon smyrnensis) found in Jiangsu Province. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 45, 89. (in Chinese)
	[鲁长虎, 雷铭, 张宇 (2010) 江苏省发现黑冠鹃隼、白胸翡翠. 动物学杂志, 45, 89.]
[9]	Pearson RG, Raxworthy CJ, Nakamura M, Townsend Peterson A, (2007) Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 102-117. DOI URL
[10]	R Core Team (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. (accessed on 2022-11-15)
[11]	Sergio F, Caro T, Brown D, Clucas B, Hunter J, Ketchum J, McHugh K, Hiraldo F (2008) Top predators as conservation tools: Ecological rationale, assumptions, and efficacy. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 1-19. DOI URL
[12]	Sergio F, Newton I, Marchesi L, Pedrini P (2006) Ecologically justified charisma: Preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 1049-1055. DOI URL
[13]	Sun CQ, Wang WY, Xu ZW, Feng N, Zhang L (2007) Primary report on avian investigation in Shaanxi Province. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 32, 993-995. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[孙承骞, 王万云, 徐振武, 冯宁, 张璐 (2007) 陕西省鸟类调查初报. 动物分类学报, 32, 993-995.]
[14]	Ta Q, Li YK, Fan WQ, Shan JH, Tu XB, Ying Q, Miao LJ, Shao RQ, Shen J (2021) Predicting the potential distribution of Chinese pangolin using the MaxEnt model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 9941-9952. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[塔旗, 李言阔, 范文青, 单继红, 涂晓斌, 应钦, 缪泸君, 邵瑞清, 申锦 (2021) 基于最大熵生态位模型的中华穿山甲潜在适宜生境预测. 生态学报, 41, 9941-9952.]
[15]	Thiollay JM (2006) The decline of raptors in West Africa: Long-term assessment and the role of protected areas. Ibis, 148, 240-254. DOI URL
[16]	Tinajero R, Barragán F, Chapa-Vargas L (2017) Raptor functional diversity in scrubland-agricultural landscapes of northern-central-Mexican dryland environments. Tropical Conservation Science, 10, 194008291771242.
[17]	Vanagas G (2004) Receiver operating characteristic curves and comparison of cardiac surgery risk stratification systems. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 3, 319-322. DOI PMID
[18]	Wang YS, Xie BY, Wan FH, Xiao QM, Dai LY (2007) Application of ROC curve analysis in evaluating the performance of alien species' potential distribution models. Biodiversity Science, 15, 365-372. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[王运生, 谢丙炎, 万方浩, 肖启明, 戴良英 (2007) ROC曲线分析在评价入侵物种分布模型中的应用. 生物多样性, 15, 365-372.] DOI
[19]	Zhang HJ, Chen Y, Huang LJ, Ni HW (2011) Predicting potential geographic distribution of Mikania micrantha planting based on ecological niche models in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 27(S1), 413-418, 420. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张海娟, 陈勇, 黄烈健, 倪汉文 (2011) 基于生态位模型的薇甘菊在中国适生区的预测. 农业工程学报, 27(S1), 413-418, 420.]
[20]	Zhao BB, Xu WJ, Li CL (2022) Bird diversity differences in four different habitats in Yaoluoping Nature Reserve in summer. Ecological Science, 41, 63-72. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[赵彬彬, 徐文玖, 李春林 (2022) 鹞落坪保护区四种不同生境的夏季鸟类多样性差异. 生态科学, 41, 63-72.]
[21]	Zhao ZJ (2001) A Handbook of the Birds of China. Jilin Science and Technology Press, Changchun. (in Chinese)
	[赵正阶 (2001) 中国鸟类志. 吉林科学技术出版社, 长春.]

地点 Location	纬度 Latitude (N)	经度 Longitude (E)	海拔 Altitude (m)	调查时间 Investigation date
紫竹溪 Zizhuxi	26°31′	117°30′	649	2022.7
溪边 Xibian	26°28′	117°33′	504	2022.7
张坊 Zhangfang	26°21′	117°29′	756	2022.5
樟树垄 Zhangshulong	26°19′	117°07′	668	2022.5-8
肖家山 Xiaojiashan	26°17′	117°13′	631	2022.5-8
扬厝坂 Yangcuoban	26°31′	117°32′	606	2022.7
溪边村 Xibiancun	26°28′	117°33′	505	2022.7
旦上 Danshang	26°25′	117°20′	801	2022.8
东坑际 Dongkengji	26°17′	117°12′	646	2022.5
伯公洞 Bogong Cave	26°17′	117°09′	494	2022.7
中溪 Zhongxi	26°29′	116°59′	403	2022.5-8
楼前 Louqian	26°31′	117°03′	383	2022.7
官排任 Guanpairen	26°31′	117°06′	358	2022.8
城关山 Chengguanshan	26°22′	117°13′	343	2022.8
小石珩 Xiaoshiheng	26°17′	117°08′	450	2022.5-8
当洲 Dangzhou	26°29′	117°00′	374	2022.5

地点 Location	纬度 Latitude (N)	经度 Longitude (E)	海拔 Altitude (m)	调查时间 Investigation date
紫竹溪 Zizhuxi	26°31′	117°30′	649	2022.7
溪边 Xibian	26°28′	117°33′	504	2022.7
张坊 Zhangfang	26°21′	117°29′	756	2022.5
樟树垄 Zhangshulong	26°19′	117°07′	668	2022.5-8
肖家山 Xiaojiashan	26°17′	117°13′	631	2022.5-8
扬厝坂 Yangcuoban	26°31′	117°32′	606	2022.7
溪边村 Xibiancun	26°28′	117°33′	505	2022.7
旦上 Danshang	26°25′	117°20′	801	2022.8
东坑际 Dongkengji	26°17′	117°12′	646	2022.5
伯公洞 Bogong Cave	26°17′	117°09′	494	2022.7
中溪 Zhongxi	26°29′	116°59′	403	2022.5-8
楼前 Louqian	26°31′	117°03′	383	2022.7
官排任 Guanpairen	26°31′	117°06′	358	2022.8
城关山 Chengguanshan	26°22′	117°13′	343	2022.8
小石珩 Xiaoshiheng	26°17′	117°08′	450	2022.5-8
当洲 Dangzhou	26°29′	117°00′	374	2022.5

模型 Model	K	df	AIC_c	ΔAIC_c	LogLik	AIC权重 AIC weight
土地利用类型 + 人口密度 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + Population density + Distance from road	3	7	41.48	0.00	-11.40	0.24
土地利用类型 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + Distance from road	2	6	41.75	0.27	-13.20	0.21
土地利用类型 + NDVI 0625 + 人口密度 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + NDVI 0625 + Population density + Distance from road	4	8	42.76	1.28	-10.25	0.13
土地利用类型 + NDVI 0625 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + NDVI 0625 + Distance from road	3	7	42.77	1.30	-12.05	0.13
土地利用类型 + NDVI 0711 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + NDVI 0711 + Distance from road	3	7	44.20	2.72	-12.76	0.06
土地利用类型 + 人口密度 + 距道路距离 + 距水源距离 Land-use type + Population density + Distance from road + Distance from water	4	8	44.61	3.13	-11.17	0.06
距道路距离 Distance from road	1	2	44.64	3.16	-20.11	0.05
土地利用类型 + NDVI 0711 + 人口密度 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + NDVI 0711 + Population density + Distance from road	4	8	44.72	3.24	-11.23	0.05
土地利用类型 + 距道路距离 + 距水源距离 Land-use type + Distance from road + Distance from water	3	7	45.05	3.58	-13.19	0.04
距水源距离 Distance from water	1	2	45.18	3.70	-20.38	0.04

模型 Model	K	df	AIC_c	ΔAIC_c	LogLik	AIC权重 AIC weight
土地利用类型 + 人口密度 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + Population density + Distance from road	3	7	41.48	0.00	-11.40	0.24
土地利用类型 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + Distance from road	2	6	41.75	0.27	-13.20	0.21
土地利用类型 + NDVI 0625 + 人口密度 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + NDVI 0625 + Population density + Distance from road	4	8	42.76	1.28	-10.25	0.13
土地利用类型 + NDVI 0625 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + NDVI 0625 + Distance from road	3	7	42.77	1.30	-12.05	0.13
土地利用类型 + NDVI 0711 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + NDVI 0711 + Distance from road	3	7	44.20	2.72	-12.76	0.06
土地利用类型 + 人口密度 + 距道路距离 + 距水源距离 Land-use type + Population density + Distance from road + Distance from water	4	8	44.61	3.13	-11.17	0.06
距道路距离 Distance from road	1	2	44.64	3.16	-20.11	0.05
土地利用类型 + NDVI 0711 + 人口密度 + 距道路距离 Land-use type + NDVI 0711 + Population density + Distance from road	4	8	44.72	3.24	-11.23	0.05
土地利用类型 + 距道路距离 + 距水源距离 Land-use type + Distance from road + Distance from water	3	7	45.05	3.58	-13.19	0.04
距水源距离 Distance from water	1	2	45.18	3.70	-20.38	0.04

环境变量 Environmental variable	估计值 Estimate	标准误 Standard error	Z	P
林地 Forest land	-2.515	1.426	1.684	0.0922
草地 Grassland	-0.9054	1.845	0.469	0.6388
水体 Water body	19.05	5,767	0.003	0.9975
人造地表 Artificial surface	34.60	3,379	0.010	0.9922
人口密度 Population density	-5.453	3.750	1.383	0.1666
距道路距离 Distance from road	70.78	32.82	2.071	0.0383*
NDVI 0625	0.0006538	0.0004782	1.300	0.1937
NDVI 0711	-0.0004160	0.0005405	0.733	0.4639
距水源距离 Distance from water	11.84	19.27	0.589	0.5560

福建省明溪县黑冠鹃隼生境适宜性

Habitat suitability for the Aviceda leuphotes in Mingxi County, Fujian Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 21

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	董廷玮, 黄美玲, 韦旭, 马硕, 岳衢, 刘文丽, 郑佳鑫, 王刚, 马蕊, 丁由中, 薄顺奇, 王正寰. 上海地区金线侧褶蛙种群的潜在空间分布格局及其景观连通性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 22692-.
[2]	鲍虞园, 李银康, 林吴颖, 周志琴, 肖晓波, 颉晓勇. 中国南海北部近海鲎资源调查及北部湾潮间带中华鲎幼鲎潜在栖息地评估[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22407-.
[3]	邓昶, 郝杰威, 高德, 任明迅, 张莉娜. 海南受威胁苔藓植物适生热点区域识别与保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22580-.
[4]	施雨含, 任宗昕, 王维嘉, 徐鑫, 刘杰, 赵延会, 王红. 中国-喜马拉雅三种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂的空间分布预测[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 759-769.
[5]	袁海生, 魏玉莲, 周丽伟, 秦问敏, 崔宝凯, 何双辉. 东北4种林木干基腐朽病原真菌潜在分布范围预测及其生态位分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(8): 873-879.
[6]	崔绍朋, 罗晓, 李春旺, 胡慧建, 蒋志刚. 基于MaxEnt模型预测白唇鹿的潜在分布区[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(2): 171-176.
[7]	武晓宇, 董世魁, 刘世梁, 刘全儒, 韩雨晖, 张晓蕾, 苏旭坤, 赵海迪, 冯憬. 基于MaxEnt模型的三江源区草地濒危保护植物热点区识别[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(2): 138-148.
[8]	褚建民, 李毅夫, 张雷, 李斌, 高明远, 唐晓倩, 倪建伟, 许新桥. 濒危物种长柄扁桃的潜在分布与保护策略[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(8): 799-806.
[9]	应凌霄, 刘晔, 陈绍田, 沈泽昊. 气候变化情景下基于最大熵模型的中国西南地区清香木潜在分布格局模拟[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(4): 453-461.
[10]	崔相艳, 王文娟, 杨小强, 李述, 秦声远, 戎俊. 基于生态位模型预测野生油茶的潜在分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(10): 1117-1128.
[11]	吴文, 李月辉, 胡远满, 陈龙, 李悦, 李泽鸣, 聂志文, 陈探. 小兴安岭南麓马鹿冬季适宜生境评价[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(1): 20-29.
[12]	康萨如拉, 张庆, 牛建明, 董建军, 马文静, 李欣, 常昌明, 尚辰蔚. 景观历史对物种多样性的影响: 以内蒙古伊敏露天煤矿为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(2): 117-128.