白鹤利用农田作为中转取食生境的原因

doi:10.17520/biods.2022093

生物多样性 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 22093. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022093

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

白鹤利用农田作为中转取食生境的原因

高洁¹, 李德浩¹, 姜海波¹^,^*(), 邓光怡¹, 张超凡², 何春光¹^,^*(), 孙鹏³

1.东北师范大学国家环境保护湿地生态与植被恢复重点实验室/植被生态科学教育部重点实验室, 长春 130117
2.吉林省林业科学研究院, 长春 130033
3.吉林莫莫格国家级自然保护区, 吉林白城 137000

收稿日期:2022-02-26 接受日期:2022-06-16 出版日期:2022-11-20 发布日期:2022-09-29
通讯作者: 姜海波,何春光
作者简介:he-cg@nenu.edu.cn
* E-mail: jianghb625@nenu.edu.cn;
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(U19A2042);国家自然科学基金(41901116)

Analyzing the relative habitat use by Siberian cranes on migratory stopover sites: A traditional wetland species switching to croplands for food resources

Jie Gao¹, Dehao Li¹, Haibo Jiang¹^,^*(), Guangyi Deng¹, Chaofan Zhang², Chunguang He¹^,^*(), Peng Sun³

1. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration; Key Laboratory for Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117
2. Jilin Provincial Academy of Forestry Sciences, Changchun 130033
3. Momoge National Nature Reserve of Jilin, Baicheng, Jilin 137000

Received:2022-02-26 Accepted:2022-06-16 Online:2022-11-20 Published:2022-09-29
Contact: Haibo Jiang,Chunguang He

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

白鹤(Grus leucogeranus)为IUCN红色名录极危物种, 在中转停歇地松嫩平原的停歇生境为湿地, 近年来却出现多数个体迁离湿地转移到玉米(Zea mays)地取食停歇的现象。为探究迁徙白鹤在中转停歇地取食生境利用变化的原因, 我们于2020年9月至2021年11月对该区域白鹤种群数量和取食生境等进行观测, 并对食物资源量进行了分析。结果表明: (1)在农田生境取食的白鹤个体数量占比达72.7%, 是湿地生境的2.66倍。农田已成为迁徙白鹤在中转停歇地的主要取食生境之一。(2)根据不同的收割方式, 农田可提供的总能量是湿地的1.24-2.79倍; 白鹤在农田的日摄入能量约为湿地的1.56倍。(3)在农田白鹤的每日取食时间约占总活动时长的53.5%, 是湿地的1.67倍, 取食成功率是湿地的1.56倍。白鹤取食生境利用变化的主要原因可能是由于水位变化、食物资源变化、取食难易度不同和人为干扰等综合作用导致。为有效保护和管理白鹤生境, 建议合理进行湿地生态补水调控并恢复白鹤主要食源植物, 开展农业用地保护计划并设置自然保护小区。

关键词: 白鹤, 迁徙停歇地, 农田, 湿地, 食物资源

Abstract

Aims: Siberian crane (Grus leucogeranus) is a migratory, endangered species that uses the Songnen Plain as a main stopover area. Traditionally a wetland species, today most populations of Siberian cranes feed and rest during migratory stopovers in fields of corn (Zea mays). By examining the causes of this change in stopover habitat use, we can provide better protection for and potentially recovery of this declining species.

Methods: We recorded the numbers of Siberian cranes and both food resource and habitat usage on stopover sites on the Songnen Plain from September 2020 to November 2021 in the study area. These data were collected and analyzed using Google Earth, ArcGIS 10.7.

Results: Of the total number of Siberian cranes we observed, 72.7% were feeding on farmland, which was 2.66 times more than that of wetland habitats. Farmland has become the main feeding habitat for Siberian cranes. The total energy provided by farmland was 1.24-2.79 times as much as that provided by wetlands based on different harvesting methods, and the energy intake of Siberian cranes in farmland was about 1.56 times that of wetland. The daily feeding budget of Siberian cranes in farmland was 53.5% of their total time, which was 1.67 times more than that in wetlands. The feeding success rate in farmland was 1.56 times as much as that in wetland habitats.

Conclusions & Suggestions: The main reasons for the changes in feeding habitat use on migratory stopover sites by Siberian cranes may be attributed to the comprehensive effects of the change in water level, altered food resources, various feeding difficulties, and human disturbance. For effective protection and management of Siberian crane populations, we suggest that water supply be regulated to maintain wetland habitats on their migratory stopover sites to restore their main food source. It is also necessary to protect the agricultural land used by the species, and create a habitat refuge to support birds during their migration when they are particularly vulnerable to resource shortages.

Key words: Siberian crane, migratory stopover sites, farmland, wetland, food resource

高洁, 李德浩, 姜海波, 邓光怡, 张超凡, 何春光, 孙鹏 (2022) 白鹤利用农田作为中转取食生境的原因. 生物多样性, 30, 22093. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022093.

Jie Gao, Dehao Li, Haibo Jiang, Guangyi Deng, Chaofan Zhang, Chunguang He, Peng Sun (2022) Analyzing the relative habitat use by Siberian cranes on migratory stopover sites: A traditional wetland species switching to croplands for food resources. Biodiversity Science, 30, 22093. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022093.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2022093

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2022/V30/I11/22093

图/表 4

参考文献 29

[1]	Anderson CM, Gilchrist HG, Ronconi RA, Shlepr KR, Clark DE, Fifield DA, Robertson GJ, Mallory ML (2020) Both short and long distance migrants use energy-minimizing migration strategies in North American herring gulls. Movement Ecology, 8, 26-38. DOI PMID
[2]	Burnham J, Barzen J, Pidgeon AM, Sun BT, Wu JD, Liu GH, Jiang HX (2017) Novel foraging by wintering Siberian cranes Leucogeranus leucogeranus at China’s Poyang Lake indicates broader changes in the ecosystem and raises new challenges for a critically endangered species. Bird Conservation International, 27, 204-223.
[3]	Chen Q, Wang ZR, Tang WC, Ding HF, Liao JY, Wang YF, Wang WJ (2022) Carrying capacity of Siberian cranes (Leucogeranus leucogeranus) in the rice fields around Poyang Lake. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42, 5340-5347. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[陈青, 汪志如, 汤文超, 丁慧芳, 廖劲扬, 王亚芳, 王文娟 (2022) 鄱阳湖周边稻田对白鹤的承载力. 生态学报, 42, 5340-5347.
[4]	Danner RM, Greenberg RS, Danner JE, Kirkpatrick LT, Walters JR (2013) Experimental support for food limitation of a short-distance migratory bird wintering in the temperate zone. Ecology, 94, 2803-2816. PMID
[5]	Gawlik DE (2002) The effects of prey availability on the numerical response of wading birds. Ecological Monographs, 72, 329-346.
[6]	Gianpasquale C, Alberto M (2019) The occurrence and density of three sympatric corvids in a Mediterranean agroecosystem explained by land use. Journal of Ornithology, 160, 1133-1150.
[7]	Guo HB, Li XM, Wang SR, Wang LG (2013) Differences in the diets of red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis) in spring on the Sanjiang and Songnen plains, China. Chinese Journal of Wildlife, 34(3), 165-170. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郭华兵, 李晓民, 王思睿, 王令刚 (2013) 三江、松嫩平原丹顶鹤春季食性差异分析. 野生动物, 34(3), 165-170.]
[8]	Harris J, Mirande C (2013) A global overview of cranes: Status, threats and conservation priorities. Chinese Birds, 4, 189-209.
[9]	Hou JJ, Liu YF, Fraser JD, Li L, Zhao B, Lan ZC, Jin JF, Liu GH, Dai NH, Wang WJ (2020) Drivers of a habitat shift by critically endangered Siberian cranes: Evidence from long-term data. Ecology and Evolution, 10, 11055-11068. DOI PMID
[10]	Hou JJ, Wang YF, Jin BS, Wang LH, Wang WJ (2019) Food composition of Siberian cranes in agricultural fields in the Poyang Lake, China. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 54, 15-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[侯谨谨, 王亚芳, 金斌松, 王榄华, 王文娟 (2019) 鄱阳湖越冬白鹤在农业用地的食物组成. 动物学杂志, 54, 15-21.]
[11]	Jiang HB (2016) Study on the Conservation and Restoration of the Habitat for Migratory Siberian Crane (Scirpus planiculmis) Eastern Population in Momoge National Nature Reserve, China. PhD dissertation, Northeast Normal University, Changchun. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[姜海波 (2016) 白鹤(Scirpus planiculmis)东部种群迁徙停歇区湿地生境保育与恢复研究. 博士学位论文, 东北师范大学, 长春.]
[12]	Jiang HB, He CG, Luo WB, Yang HJ, Sheng LX, Bian HF, Zou CL (2018) Hydrological restoration and water resource management of Siberian crane (Grus leucogeranus) stopover wetlands. Water, 10, 1714.
[13]	Jiang HB, He CG, Sheng LX, Tang ZH, Wen Y, Yan TT, Zou CL (2015) Hydrological modelling for Siberian crane Grus leucogeranus stopover sites in Northeast China, PLoS ONE, 10, e0122687.
[14]	Jiang HB, Wen Y, Zou LF, Wang ZQ, He CG, Zou CL (2016) The effects of a wetland restoration project on the Siberian crane (Grus leucogeranus) population and stopover habitat in Momoge National Nature Reserve, China. Ecological Engineering, 96, 170-177.
[15]	Li CL, Beauchamp G, Wang Z, Cui P (2016) Collective vigilance in the wintering hooded crane: The role of flock size and anthropogenic disturbances in a human-dominated landscape. Ethology, 122, 999-1008.
[16]	Lunardi VO, Macedo RH, Granadeiro JP, Palmeirim JM (2012) Migratory flows and foraging habitat selection by shorebirds along the northeastern coast of Brazil: The case of Baía de Todos os Santos. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 96, 179-187.
[17]	Qu HP, Ma W, Li Y (2019) Research on development strategy of agricultural mechanization in Jilin Province. Modern Communication, (18), 58-59. (in Chinese)
	[曲会朋, 马巍, 李昳 (2019) 吉林省农业机械化发展战略研究. 现代交际, (18), 58-59.]
[18]	Wang F, Wang CY, Wu DR, Yao SR, Bai YM, Zhang JQ (2018) Difference and cause analysis of drought characteristics during growth period between the corn belts of China and the United States in past 30 years. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 39, 398-410. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王芳, 王春乙, 邬定荣, 姚树然, 白月明, 张继权 (2018) 近30年中美玉米带生长季干旱特征的差异及成因分析. 中国农业气象, 39, 398-410.]
[19]	Wang MQ, Zheng CQ, Jin M, Huo YW, Li M, Xie TJ, Zhou QC (2014) Effects of dietary crude lipid level on growth performance, feed utilization and non-specific immunity of Pacific white shrimp at two growth stages. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 26, 2687-2697. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王猛强, 郑昌区, 金敏, 霍雅文, 黎明, 谢奉军, 周歧存 (2014) 粗脂肪水平对2种规格凡纳滨对虾生长性能、饲料利用和非特异性免疫的影响. 动物营养学报, 26, 2687-2697.]
[20]	Wang X, Cao L, Bysykatova I, Xu ZG, Rozenfeld S, Jeong W, Vangeluwe D, Zhao Y, Xie T, Yi K, Fox AD (2018) The Far East taiga forest: Unrecognized inhospitable terrain for migrating Arctic-nesting waterbirds? PeerJ, 6, e4353.
[21]	Wang ZJ, Xia YY, Gao ZS, Wu QM, Hanmorigen, Zhou JY, Zou HF (2019) Species diversity of waterbird communities in the wetland core areas of Tumuji National Nature Reserve in Inner Mongolia in spring. Wetland Science, 17, 74-79. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王子健, 夏媛媛, 高忠斯, 吴庆明, 韩莫日根, 周景英, 邹红菲 (2019) 春季内蒙古图牧吉国家级自然保护区湿地核心区中的水鸟群落物种多样性. 湿地科学, 17, 74-79.]
[22]	Wen D, Hu YM, Xiong ZP, Chang Y, Li YH, Wang Y, Liu M, Zhu JH (2020) Potential suitable habitat distribution and conservation strategy for the Siberian crane (Grus leucogeranus) at spring stopover sites in northeastern China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 29, 3375-3384.
[23]	Wu JD, Li FS, Burnham J (2013) Numerical distribution of Siberian cranes and their relation to food and water depth in Sha Hu at Poyang Lake, China. Wetland Science, 11, 305-312. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[吴建东, 李凤山,James Burnham (2013) 鄱阳湖沙湖越冬白鹤的数量分布及其与食物和水深的关系. 湿地科学, 11, 305-312.]
[24]	Yuan FK, Li YK, Li FS, Li J, Miao LJ, Xie GY (2014) The influence of age, flock size, habitat, and weather on the time budget and the daily rhythm of wintering Siberian cranes in Poyang Lake. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 2608-2616. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[袁芳凯, 李言阔, 李凤山, 李佳, 缪泸君, 谢光勇 (2014) 年龄、集群、生境及天气对鄱阳湖白鹤越冬期日间行为模式的影响. 生态学报, 34, 2608-2616.]
[25]	Zhang TT, Peng ZJ, Zhou DQ, Lu CH (2019) Research progress on habitat selection of red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis) in China. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 54, 134-144. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张婷婷, 彭昭杰, 周大庆, 鲁长虎 (2019) 我国丹顶鹤栖息地选择研究进展. 动物学杂志, 54, 134-144.]
[26]	Zhi YJ, Lu P, Dai NH, Shao MQ, Zeng JH (2019) Foraging behaviour of Siberian cranes in lotus pond habitats surrounding Poyang Lake. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39, 4266-4272. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[植毅进, 卢萍, 戴年华, 邵明勤, 曾健辉 (2019) 鄱阳湖滨藕塘生境中白鹤取食行为研究. 生态学报, 39, 4266-4272.]
[27]	Zhu ZT, Huai WX, Yang ZH, Li D, Wang YS (2021) Assessing habitat suitability and habitat fragmentation for endangered Siberian cranes in Poyang Lake region, China. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107594.
[28]	Zou HF, Feng XD, Wu QM, Wu YN, Hao M, Ma JZ (2012) Diet component and preference of white-naped crane during courtship period in Zhalong Nature Reserve. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 40(9), 69-76. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[邹红菲, 冯晓东, 吴庆明, 伍一宁, 郝萌, 马建章 (2012) 扎龙保护区白枕鹤求偶期食性与采食偏好. 东北林业大学学报, 40(9), 69-76.]
[29]	Zou HF, Huang HZ, Song YL, Wu QM (2018) Research progress on cranes in Songnen Plain, China. Chinese Journal of Wildlife, 39, 433-437. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[邹红菲, 黄华智, 宋雅玲, 吴庆明 (2018) 我国松嫩平原鹤类研究进展. 野生动物学报, 39, 433-437.]

水深 Water depth (cm)	平均数量 Average quantity (yield/m²)	平均生物量 Average biomass (g)	群落面积 Community area (×10⁵m²)	总数量 Total quantity (×10⁶)	总生物量 Total biomass (×10⁷g)
0	117 ± 24	0.58 ± 0.05	0.49	5.74	0.33
5	131 ± 47	1.25 ± 0.09	0.73	9.60	1.20
10	355 ± 127	1.42 ± 0.10	2.91	103.42	14.69
15	157 ± 22	1.17 ± 0.14	9.05	142.09	16.62
20	115 ± 29	1.18 ± 0.07	0.81	9.26	1.09
25	118 ± 43	0.94 ± 0.06	4.55	53.68	5.05
30	83 ± 34	0.92 ± 0.06	5.75	47.75	43.93
总计 Total	-		24.29	371.54	43.37

水深 Water depth (cm)	平均数量 Average quantity (yield/m²)	平均生物量 Average biomass (g)	群落面积 Community area (×10⁵m²)	总数量 Total quantity (×10⁶)	总生物量 Total biomass (×10⁷g)
0	117 ± 24	0.58 ± 0.05	0.49	5.74	0.33
5	131 ± 47	1.25 ± 0.09	0.73	9.60	1.20
10	355 ± 127	1.42 ± 0.10	2.91	103.42	14.69
15	157 ± 22	1.17 ± 0.14	9.05	142.09	16.62
20	115 ± 29	1.18 ± 0.07	0.81	9.26	1.09
25	118 ± 43	0.94 ± 0.06	4.55	53.68	5.05
30	83 ± 34	0.92 ± 0.06	5.75	47.75	43.93
总计 Total	-		24.29	371.54	43.37

秸秆处理方式 Straw treatment mode	平均数量 Average quantity (yield/m²)	平均生物量 Average biomass (g/m²)	总数量 Total quantity (×10⁹)	总生物量 Total biomass (×10⁹g)
秸秆离田 Straw leaving field	12 ± 2	9.14 ± 0.03	1.07	0.80
秸秆还田 Straw returning to field	27 ± 15	20.49 ± 0.03	2.39	1.80

秸秆处理方式 Straw treatment mode	平均数量 Average quantity (yield/m²)	平均生物量 Average biomass (g/m²)	总数量 Total quantity (×10⁹)	总生物量 Total biomass (×10⁹g)
秸秆离田 Straw leaving field	12 ± 2	9.14 ± 0.03	1.07	0.80
秸秆还田 Straw returning to field	27 ± 15	20.49 ± 0.03	2.39	1.80

白鹤利用农田作为中转取食生境的原因

Analyzing the relative habitat use by Siberian cranes on migratory stopover sites: A traditional wetland species switching to croplands for food resources

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张乃鹏, 梁洪儒, 张焱, 孙超, 陈勇, 王路路, 夏江宝, 高芳磊. 土壤类型和地下水埋深对黄河三角洲典型盐沼植物群落空间分异的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23370-.
[2]	吴浩, 余玉蓉, 王佳钰, 赵媛博, 高娅菲, 李小玲, 卜贵军, 薛丹, 吴林. 低水位增加灌木多样性和生物量但降低土壤有机碳含量: 以鄂西南贫营养泥炭地为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22600-.
[3]	黄雨菲, 路春燕, 贾明明, 王自立, 苏越, 苏艳琳. 基于无人机影像与面向对象-深度学习的滨海湿地植物物种分类[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22411-.
[4]	王士政, 孙翊斐, 李珍珍, 舒越, 冯佳伟, 王天明. 鸟类迁徙对图们江下游湿地声景时间格局的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22337-.
[5]	汪婷, 周立志. 合肥市小微湿地鸟类多样性的时空格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 21445-.
[6]	付裕, 黄康祥, 蔡锦枫, 陈慧敏, 任久生, 万松泽, 张扬, 任珩, 毛瑢, 石福习. 三江平原沼泽湿地4种优势植物空间格局对不同水位环境的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(3): 21392-.
[7]	刘笑彤, 田艺佳, 刘汉文, 梁翠影, 姜思维, 梁文举, 张晓珂. 下辽河平原农田土壤线虫群落组成的季节变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(12): 22222-.
[8]	高梅香, 刘启龙, 朱家祺, 赵博宇, 杜嘉, 吴东辉. 中国农田土壤动物长期监测样地科学调查监测的实施方法[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(1): 21265-.
[9]	段美春, 覃如霞, 张宏斌, 陈宝雄, 金彬, 张松泊, 任少鹏, 金树权, 朱升海, 华家宁, 刘云慧, 宇振荣. 农田节肢动物不同取样方法的综合比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(4): 477-487.
[10]	黄越, 顾燚芸, 阳文锐, 闻丞. 如何在北京充分实现受胁鸟类栖息地保护?[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 340-350.
[11]	张菁, 白煜, 黄子强, 张正旺, 李东来. 盐地碱蓬盐沼与相邻泥质滩涂湿地迁徙期鸻鹬类的群落组成及行为差异[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 351-360.
[12]	曲方圆, 李淑芸, 赵林林, 杨松颖, 万铭扬, 蔡吕彤, 张朝晖. 黄海生态区保护空缺分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 385-393.
[13]	李宝泉, 姜少玉, 吕卷章, 陈琳琳, 闫朗, 刘春云, 李晓静, 宋博, 李新正. 黄河三角洲潮间带及近岸浅海大型底栖动物物种组成及长周期变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(12): 1511-1522.
[14]	孙工棋, 张明祥, 雷光春. 黄河流域湿地水鸟多样性保护对策[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(12): 1469-1482.
[15]	郎雪敏, Gankhuyag Purev-Ochir, Oyunchimeg Terbish, Dashdorj Khurelbaatar, Baasansuren Erdenechimeg, Amarkhuu Gungaa, 宓春荣, 郭玉民. 滦河上游——白枕鹤西部种群的重要停歇地[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(10): 1213-1221.