基于红外相机调查上海市区小灵猫的活动节律、栖息地利用及其对人类活动的响应

doi:10.17520/biods.2022294

生物多样性 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 22294. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022294

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

基于红外相机调查上海市区小灵猫的活动节律、栖息地利用及其对人类活动的响应

王怡涵, 赵倩倩, 刁奕欣, 顾伯健, 翁悦, 张卓锦, 陈泳滨, 王放^*()

复旦大学生命科学学院生物多样性与生态工程教育部重点实验室, 上海 200438

收稿日期:2022-06-01 接受日期:2022-08-08 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2022-11-11
通讯作者: *王放, E-mail: wfang@fudan.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32270543);兽类红外相机调查(上海半封闭生境区域试点) 2020(SGH1322202)

Diel activity, habitat utilization, and response to anthropogenic interference of small Indian civets (Viverricula indica) in Shanghai urban areas based on camera trapping

Yihan Wang, Qianqian Zhao, Yixin Diao, Bojian Gu, Yue Weng, Zhuojin Zhang, Yongbin Chen, Fang Wang^*()

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438

Received:2022-06-01 Accepted:2022-08-08 Online:2023-02-20 Published:2022-11-11
Contact: *Fang Wang, E-mail: wfang@fudan.edu.cn

1. 附录1 上海市杨浦区新江湾区域各红外相机位点小灵猫、流浪猫、鸟类和人类独立探测事件数.pdf(118KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

快速的城市化进程使城市生物多样性保护面临巨大挑战。小灵猫(Viverricula indica)作为国家一级重点保护野生动物, 对其在城市环境下分布和栖息地的研究存在显著空缺。本研究基于红外相机监测技术, 在2020年6月至2021年10月调查了上海新江湾区域25个位点, 累计总有效红外相机工作日1,581 d, 在9个位点独立探测到小灵猫65次。基于红外相机影像完成了对小灵猫初步的个体识别, 探明了上海市新江湾区域存在一个至少包含5只小灵猫个体的极小种群。研究发现, 小灵猫的活动节律呈严格夜行性, 日活动曲线呈双峰分布, 活动高峰分别出现在夜间21:00和凌晨02:00前后。小灵猫对于人类活动和流浪猫呈现不同程度的时间和空间回避, 与人类活动时间重叠度指数低(∆ = 0.15), 并显著回避人类相对活动高的区域; 与流浪猫活动空间回避不显著, 但在时间上显著回避。在栖息地利用上, 小灵猫多分布在新江湾区域靠近水域的林灌丛生境中, 其适宜生境在城市环境中很可能处于快速退缩中, 具有独特的研究和保护价值。研究结果初步填补了国内相关研究空缺, 能够为推动以小灵猫为代表的城市生物多样性的保护和管理提供科学支持。

关键词: 小灵猫, 红外相机, 日活动节律, 栖息地选择, 城市生物多样性

Abstract

Aims: Rapid urbanization processes have brought great challenges to the conservation of urban biodiversity. The small Indian civet (Viverricula indica) is a national first-class key protected wild animal, yet ecological research about its wild populations in urban environments is rare. The aims of this study are to: (1) understand how small Indian civets respond to stray cats and human activities in time and space in urban landscapes; (2) investigate the habitat characteristics of small Indian civets in a human-dominated landscape; and (3) evaluate habitat changes of small Indian civets during the time period of 2000-2020.

Methods: We used infrared camera traps to investigate the small Indian civets in the urban environment. From June 2020 to October 2021, we conducted camera trap surveys at 25 sites in the Xinjiangwan area, Yangpu District, Shanghai. We conducted individual identification, and then analyzed species diel activity pattern and measured the overlapping index and calculated the avoidance-attraction ratios between small Indian civets and stray cats and humans, respectively. In addition, we calculated the relative abundance index (RAI) of humans, stray cats, and birds, and used an independent sample t-test to test the site differences where small Indian civets were detected and not detected. Lastly, we utilized remote sensing data to analyze the landscape changes of small Indian civet habitat during the time period of 2000-2020.

Results: We have achieved a sampling effort of 1,581 camera days, and obtained 65 independent small Indian civet detections at night sites. We identified 5 small Indian civet individuals. The diel activity pattern of small Indian civet was strictly nocturnal, with two nighttime activity peaks around 21:00 and 02:00. The temporal overlap index of small Indian civet and human activities was 0.15, and that of stray cats was 0.66. The avoidance-attractive ratio between small Indian civet and stray cats was 9.94 ± 7.84. Human activity at sites where small Indian civets were detected was significantly less than that of the sites where the species was not undetected (t = -2.539, P = 0.021). Landscape analysis results indicated that most of the green space was replaced by artificial landscapes, and the degree of fragmentation and isolation increased during the past two decades.

Conclusion: Small Indian civets demonstrate spatial and temporal avoidance to human activities and stray cats. The existing landscapes that are potentially suitable for small Indian civet are fragmented, and immediate actions are needed to conserve the remaining small Indian civet population in urban landscapes.

Key words: small Indian civet, camera trapping, diel activity pattern, habitat selection, urban biodiversity

王怡涵, 赵倩倩, 刁奕欣, 顾伯健, 翁悦, 张卓锦, 陈泳滨, 王放 (2023) 基于红外相机调查上海市区小灵猫的活动节律、栖息地利用及其对人类活动的响应. 生物多样性, 31, 22294. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022294.

Yihan Wang, Qianqian Zhao, Yixin Diao, Bojian Gu, Yue Weng, Zhuojin Zhang, Yongbin Chen, Fang Wang (2023) Diel activity, habitat utilization, and response to anthropogenic interference of small Indian civets (Viverricula indica) in Shanghai urban areas based on camera trapping. Biodiversity Science, 31, 22294. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022294.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2022294

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2023/V31/I2/22294

图/表 7

图1 上海杨浦区新江湾区域红外相机布设位点示意图

Fig. 1 Location of camera trap sites in the Xinjiangwan area, Yangpu District, Shanghai

图2 小灵猫和流浪猫之间的时间响应模型图

Fig. 2 Avoidance-attraction ratio model between small Indian civet and stray cat

图3 小灵猫个体识别图(红框展示的是尾基部的间断和连续斑纹排列)

Fig. 3 Individual identification of small Indian civets (red box indicates discrete and continuous stripes)

表1 小灵猫个体特征表

Table 1 Individual characteristics of small Indian civets

编号 No.	体侧斑纹 Side spots	尾部环纹 Tail stripe	尾基部的斑纹排列形状 Spots on buttock
1	无 None	明显 Clear	无斑纹 No spot
2	浅淡 Light	明显 Clear	未知 Unknown
3	无 None	无 None	不明显 Unclear
4	明显 Clear	明显 Clear	斑纹间断 Discrete stripe
5	明显 Clear	明显 Clear	斑纹连续 Continuous stripe

图4 小灵猫与人类(a)、流浪猫(b)日活动节律的关系

Fig. 4 Diel activity pattern of small Indian civet, human (a) and stray cat (b)

图5 小灵猫分布与人类活动(a)、流浪猫(b)、鸟类(c)相对多度指数(RAI)之间的关系。* P < 0.05。

Fig. 5 Relationship between the distribution of small Indian civet and human (a), stray cat (b), and bird (c) relative abundance index (RAI). * P < 0.05.

表2 2000年与2020年上海市杨浦区新江湾区域景观指数

Table 2 Landscape indices of Xinjiangwan area, Yangpu District, Shanghai in 2000 and 2020

	绿地 Green space		人造地表 Artificial surface		水体 Water		耕地 Farmland		裸地 Barren
	2000	2020	2000	2020	2000	2020	2000	2020	2000	2020
斑块面积 Patch area (ha)	390.84	215.21	453.60	715.77	10.53	20.25	8.82	1.42	89.55	0
斑块面积占比 Percentage of patch area (%)	41.03	22.59	47.55	75.13	1.10	2.13	0.92	0.15	9.39	0
斑块个数 Number of patch	6	42	2	11	6	9	2	1	3	0
斑块平均面积 Mean patch area (ha)	65.14	5.16	226.8	65.07	1.76	2.25	4.41	1.42	29.85	0
连接度指数 Connect index	91.5	23.45	86.1	54.5455	33.33	36.11	0	0	83.3	0

参考文献 45

[1]	Aronson MF, Lepczyk CA, Evans KL, Goddard MA, Lerman SB, MacIvor JS, Nilon CH, Vargo T (2017) Biodiversity in the city: Key challenges for urban green space management. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 15, 189-196.
[2]	Altaf M (2017) First record of small Indian civet (Viverricula indica) from Azad Jammu and Kashmir Himalaya, Pakistan. Journal of Wildlife and Ecology, 1, 17-24.
[3]	Bengsen AJ, Leung LK, Lapidge SJ, Gordon IJ (2011) Using a general index approach to analyze camera-trap abundance indices. Journal of Wildlife Management, 75, 1222-1227.
[4]	Borchers DL, Efford M (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies. Biometrics, 64, 377-385. PMID
[5]	Chen L, Wei Q, Fu Q, Feng D (2021) Spatiotemporal evolution analysis of habitat quality under high-speed urbanization: A case study of urban core area of China Lin-Gang Free Trade Zone (2002-2019). Land, 10, 167.
[6]	Chen MT, Tewes ME, Pei1 KJ, Lon IG (2009) Activity patterns and habitat use of sympatric small carnivores in southern Taiwan. Mammalia, 73(6), 20-26.
[7]	Conejero C, Castillo-Contreras R, González-Crespo C, Serrano E, Mentaberre G, Lavín S, López-Olvera JR (2019) Past experiences drive citizen perception of wild boar in urban areas. Mammalian Biology, 96, 68-72. DOI
[8]	Cui YY, Xie ZG, Xu X, Chu KL, Jiang WZ, Pei EL, Yuan X, Xu HF (2013) Activity laws and feeding behavior of introduced badgers. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 41, 3407-3409. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[崔勇勇, 谢志刚, 徐循, 褚可龙, 蒋文忠, 裴恩乐, 袁晓, 徐宏发 (2013) 引入狗獾活动规律和取食行为的研究. 安徽农业科学, 41, 3407-3409.]
[9]	Debata S, Swain KK (2018) Estimating mammalian diversity and relative abundance using camera traps in a tropical deciduous forest of Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, Eastern India. Mammal Study, 43, 1-9.
[10]	Dri GF, Fontana CS, Dambros CS (2021) Estimating the impacts of habitat loss induced by urbanization on bird local extinctions. Biological Conservation, 256, 109064. DOI URL
[11]	Filloy J, Zurita GA, Bellocq MI (2019) Bird diversity in urban ecosystems: The role of the biome and land use along urbanization gradients. Ecosystems, 22, 213-227. DOI
[12]	Gaynor KM, Hojnowski CE, Carter NH, Brashares JS (2018) The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science, 360, 1232-1235. DOI PMID
[13]	Hao H, Chu KL, Pei EL, Xu HF (2009) Activity patterns of badgers in suburbs of Shanghai. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 28, 111-114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郝辉, 褚可龙, 裴恩乐, 徐宏发 (2009) 上海郊区狗獾活动规律的初步研究. 四川动物, 28, 111-114.]
[14]	Huang CW, McDonald RI, Seto KC (2018) The importance of land governance for biodiversity conservation in an era of global urban expansion. Landscape and Urban Planning, 173, 44-50. DOI URL
[15]	Jiang ZG, Wu Y, Liu SY, Jiang XL, Zhou KY, Hu HJ (2021) China’s Red List of Biodiversity: Vertebrates, Vol. 1, Mammals (I). Beijing. (in Chinese and in English)
	[蒋志刚, 吴毅, 刘少英, 蒋学龙, 周开亚, 胡慧建 (2021) 中国生物多样性红色名录:脊椎动物, 第一卷, 哺乳动物(上册). 科学出版社, 北京.]
[16]	Jin XB, Zhou BC, Qin XK, Cui ZX, Xia JH, Si Q, Liu MP (2004) The biodiversity of the derelict Jiangwan Airport in Shanghai. In: Advances in Biodiversity Conservation and Research in China VI—Proceedings of the Sixth National Symposium on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in China (ed. Ma KP), pp. 394-410. China Meteorological Press, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[金杏宝, 周保春, 秦祥堃, 崔志兴, 夏建宏, 司强, 刘漫萍 (2004) 上海江湾机场的生物多样性. 见: 中国生物多样性编号与研究进展VI——第六届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集(马克平主编), 394-410页. 气象出版社, 北京.]
[17]	Kabisch N, Selsam P, Kirsten T, Lausch A, Bumberger J (2019) A multi-sensor and multi-temporal remote sensing approach to detect land cover change dynamics in heterogeneous urban landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 99, 273-282. DOI
[18]	Kumbhojkar S, Yosef R, Kosicki JZ, Kwiatkowska PK, Tryjanowski P (2021) Dependence of the leopard Panthera pardus fusca in Jaipur, India, on domestic animals. Oryx, 55, 692-698. DOI URL
[19]	Li Y, Wan Y, Zhang Y, Gong Z, Li Z (2020) Understanding how free-ranging cats interact with humans: A case study in China with management implications. Biological Conservation, 249, 108690. DOI URL
[20]	Li Q, Wu JG, Kou XJ, Feng LM (2014) Applications of camera trap in wildlife population ecology. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 947-955. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李勤, 邬建国, 寇晓军, 冯利民 (2014) 相机陷阱在野生动物种群生态学中的应用. 应用生态学报, 24, 947-955.]
[21]	Li S, Wang DJ, Xiao ZS, Li XH, Wang TM, Feng LM, Wang Yun (2014) Camera-trapping in wildlife research and conservation in China: Review and outlook. Biodiversity Science, 22, 685-695. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[李晟, 王大军, 肖治术, 李欣海, 王天明, 冯利民, 王云 (2014) 红外相机技术在我国野生动物研究与保护中的应用与前景. 生物多样性, 22, 685-695.] DOI
[22]	Li ZL, Kang AL, Lang JM, Xue YG, Ren Y, Zhu ZW, Ma JZ, Liu PQ, Jiang GS (2014) On the assessment of big cats and their prey populations based on camera trap data. Biodiversity Science, 22, 725-732. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[李治霖, 康霭黎, 郎建民, 薛延刚, 任毅, 朱志文, 马建章, 刘培琦, 姜广顺 (2014) 探讨基于红外相机技术对大型猫科动物及其猎物的种群评估方法. 生物多样性, 22, 725-732.] DOI
[23]	Liu Z, He C, Wu J (2016) The relationship between habitat loss and fragmentation during urbanization: An empirical evaluation from 16 world cities. PLoS ONE, 11, e0154613.
[24]	MacKenzie DI, Bailey LL, Nichols JD (2004) Investigating species co-occurrence patterns when species are detected imperfectly. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 546-555. DOI URL
[25]	Meredith M, Ridout MS (2021) Overlap: Estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/overlap. (accessed on 2022-07-03)
[26]	Mudappa D, Noon BR, Kumar A, Chellam R (2007) Responses of small carnivores to rainforest fragmentation in the southern Western Ghats, India. Small Carnivore Conservation, 36, 18-26.
[27]	Mukherjee F, Singh D (2020) Assessing land use-land cover change and its impact on land surface temperature using LANDSAT data: A comparison of two urban areas in India. Earth Systems and Environment, 4, 385-407. DOI
[28]	Nouvellet P, Rasmussen GSA, MacDonald DW, Courchamp F (2012) Noisy clocks and silent sunrises: Measurement methods of daily activity pattern. Journal of Zoology, 286, 179-184. DOI URL
[29]	Oriol-Cotterill A, Macdonald DW, Valeix M, Ekwanga S, Frank LG (2015) Spatiotemporal patterns of lion space use in a human-dominated landscape. Animal Behaviour, 101, 25-37.
[30]	Parsons AW, Bland C, Forrester T, Baker Whatton MC, Schuttler SG, McShea WJ, Costello R, Kays R (2016) The ecological impact of humans and dogs on wildlife in protected areas in eastern North America. Biological Conservation, 203, 75-88. DOI URL
[31]	Piano E, Souffreau C, Merckx T, Baardsen LF, Backeljau T, Bonte D, Brans KI, Cours M, Dahirel M, Debortoli N, Decaestecker E, De Wolf K, Engelen JMT, Fontaneto D, Gianuca AT, Govaert L, Hanashiro FTT, Higuti J, Lens L, Martens K, Matheve H, Matthysen E, Pinseel E, Sablon R, Schön I, Stoks R, Van Doninck K, Van Dyck H, Vanormelingen P, Van Wichelen J, Vyverman W, De Meester L, Hendrickx F (2020) Urbanization drives cross-taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales. Global Change Biology, 26, 1196-1211. DOI PMID
[32]	Ridout MS, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 14, 322-337. DOI URL
[33]	Shanghai Agriculture and Forestry Bureau (2004) Terrestrial Wildlife Resources in Shanghai. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai. (in Chinese)
	[上海市农林局 (2004) 上海陆生野生动植物资源. 上海科学技术出版社, 上海.]
[34]	Shi C, Xu J, Roberts NJ, Liu D, Jiang G (2023) Individual automatic detection and identification of big cats with the combination of different body parts. Integrative Zoology, 18, 157-168. DOI URL
[35]	Shi CM, Xie JJ, Gu JY, Liu D, Jiang GS (2021) Amur tiger individual automatic identification based on object detection. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 4685-4693. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[史春妹, 谢佳君, 顾佳音, 刘丹, 姜广顺 (2021) 基于目标检测的东北虎个体自动识别. 生态学报, 41, 4685-4693.]
[36]	Stokeld D, Fisher A, Gentles T, Hill B, Triggs B, Woinarski JCZ, Gillespie GR (2018) What do predator diets tell us about mammal declines in Kakadu National Park? Wildlife Research, 45, 92-101. DOI URL
[37]	Valeix M, Fritz H, Loveridge AJ, Davidson Z, Jane E, Murindagomo F, MacDonald DW (2009) Does the risk of encountering lions influence African herbivore behaviour at waterholes? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 1483-1494. DOI URL
[38]	Villaseñor NR, Escobar MA (2019) Cemeteries and biodiversity conservation in cities: How do landscape and patch-level attributes influence bird diversity in urban park cemeteries? Urban Ecosystems, 22, 1037-1046. DOI
[39]	Wan HY, Cushman SA, Ganey JL (2018) Habitat fragmentation reduces genetic diversity and connectivity of the Mexican spotted owl: A simulation study using empirical resistance models. Genes, 9, 403. DOI URL
[40]	Watchorn DJ, Cowan MA, Driscoll DA, Nimmo DG, Ashman KR, Garkaklis MJ, Wilson BA, Doherty TS (2022) Artificial habitat structures for animal conservation: Design and implementation, risks and opportunities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 20, 301-309. DOI URL
[41]	Wu T, Chu KL, Jiang WZ, Gu GL, Yuan X, Xu HF (2017) Setts habitat features of reintroduced Meles meles after Release. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 36, 94-99. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[吴彤, 褚可龙, 蒋文忠, 顾国林, 袁晓, 徐宏发 (2017) 重引入狗獾释放后定居巢的生境特征. 四川动物, 36, 94-99.]
[42]	Xiao ZS, Li XH, Wang XZ, Zhou QH, Quan RC, Shen XL, Li S (2014) Developing camera-trapping protocols for wildlife monitoring in Chinese forests. Biodiversity Science, 22, 704-711. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[肖治术, 李欣海, 王学志, 周岐海, 权锐昌, 申小莉, 李晟 (2014) 探讨我国森林野生动物红外相机监测规范. 生物多样性, 22, 704-711.] DOI
[43]	Yang ZC, Chen Y, Li JS, Wang LF, Piao Y, Song ZY, Shi K (2018) Individual identification and population size assessment for Asian elephant based on camera-trapping techniques. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 38, 18-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[杨子诚, 陈颖, 李俊松, 王利繁, 飘优, 宋志勇, 时坤 (2018) 基于红外相机技术对亚洲象个体识别和种群数量的评估. 兽类学报, 38, 18-27.]
[44]	Zari MP (2018) The importance of urban biodiversity—An ecosystem services approach. Biodiversity International Journal, 2, 357-360. DOI URL
[45]	Zhou X, Chen H (2018) Impact of urbanization-related land use land cover changes and urban morphology changes on the urban heat island phenomenon. Science of the Total Environment, 635, 1467-1476. DOI URL

基于红外相机调查上海市区小灵猫的活动节律、栖息地利用及其对人类活动的响应

Diel activity, habitat utilization, and response to anthropogenic interference of small Indian civets (Viverricula indica) in Shanghai urban areas based on camera trapping

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 45

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张明军, 王合升, 颜文博, 符运南, 王琦, 曾治高. 海南大田国家级自然保护区小灵猫的活动节律与栖息地选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 23420-.
[2]	楼晨阳, 任海保, 陈小南, 米湘成, 童冉, 朱念福, 陈磊, 吴统贵, 申小莉. 钱江源国家公园森林群落的物种多样性、结构多样性及其对黑麂出现概率的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22518-.
[3]	赵坤明, 陈圣宾, 杨锡福. 基于红外相机技术调查四川都江堰破碎化森林鸟兽多样性及优势种活动节律[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22529-.
[4]	陈本平, 陈建武, 凌征文, 杨旭, 陈鑫, 李生强, 杨彪. 四川老君山国家级自然保护区林下鸟兽多样性及动态变化数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22566-.
[5]	李珍珍, 杜梦甜, 朱原辛, 王大伟, 李治霖, 王天明. 基于红外相机的不可个体识别动物种群密度估算方法[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22422-.
[6]	史湘莹, 李雪阳, 魏春玥, 孙戈, 刘震, 赵翔, 周嘉鼎, 樊简, 李成, 吕植. 雅鲁藏布大峡谷鸟兽多样性及其海拔和季节分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22491-.
[7]	王东, 赛青高娃, 王子涵, 赵宏秀, 连新明. 长江源区同域分布兔狲、藏狐和赤狐的时空重叠度[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 21365-.
[8]	孔玥峤, 刘炎林, 贺成武, 李天醍, 李全亮, 马存新, 王大军, 李晟. 评估荒漠猫的日活动节律: 基于红外相机与卫星颈圈数据的对比[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22081-.
[9]	初漠嫣, 梁书洁, 李沛芸, 贾丁, 阿卜杜赛麦提·买尔迪亚力, 李雪阳, 姜楠, 赵翔, 李发祥, 肖凌云, 吕植. 三江源国家级自然保护区内云塔村雪豹种群动态[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22157-.
[10]	邓雪琴, 刘统, 刘天时, 徐恺, 姚松, 黄小群, 肖治术. 河南内乡宝天曼国家级自然保护区豹猫及其潜在猎物之间日活动节律的季节性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22263-.
[11]	王双贵, 郭志宏, 顾伯健, 李天醍, 苏玉兵, 马伯丞, 管宏信, 黄巧雯, 王放, 张卓锦. 六盘山华北豹的栖息地利用及保护建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22342-.
[12]	牛铜钢, 刘为. 双碳战略背景下城市生态系统的碳汇功能与生物多样性可以兼得[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(8): 22168-.
[13]	周天祥, 杨华林, 张贵权, 杨建, 冯茜, 胡强, 程跃红, 张晋东, 王彬, 周材权. 四川卧龙国家级自然保护区三种高山同域鸡形目鸟类的时空生态位比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 22026-.
[14]	史丹阳, 廖书跃, 朱磊, 李彬彬. 鸟撞建筑现象概述及系统性调查案例分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(3): 21321-.
[15]	乔江, 贾国清, 周华明, 龚林, 蒋勇, 肖能文, 高晓奇, 温安祥, 王杰. 四川贡嘎山国家级自然保护区鸟兽多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(2): 20395-.