生物多样性 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 25267.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025267  cstr: 32101.14.biods.2025267

所属专题: 世界生物圈保护区专题

• 世界生物圈保护区专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

全球生物圈保护区网络生态代表性与保护成效的南北差异

武慧1,2, 俞乐1,3*, 赵剑桥4, 郑诗军1, 刘涛1, 戚文超1, 赵强1, 朱丽5, 申小莉5, 马克平2,5   

  1. 1.清华大学地球系统科学系, 北京 100084 2.东北林业大学林学院东北亚生物多样性中心, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150040 3.东亚迁徙鸟类与栖息地生态学教育部野外观测研究站, 北京100084 4.中国农业大学土地科学与技术学院, 北京 100083 5. 中国科学院植物研究所, 北京 100093
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-12 修回日期:2025-10-20 接受日期:2025-10-21 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-10-31
  • 通讯作者: 俞乐
  • 基金资助:
    科技部重点研发计划(2024YFF1307600); 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(42401314); 车八岭国家级自然保护区物候相机监测网络建设及应用项目(CBLHT-2025050); 武夷山生态环境与人体健康关联性研究项目(20242120035)

Global South-North differences in ecological representativeness and conservation performance of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves

Hui Wu1,2, Le Yu1,3*, Jianqiao Zhao4, Shijun Zheng1, Tao Liu1, Wenchao Qi1, Qiang Zhao1, Li Zhu5, Xiaoli Shen5, Keping Ma2,5   

  1. 1 Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 

    2 Northeast Asia Biodiversity Research Center, College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China 

    3 Ministry of Education Ecological Field Station for East Asian Migratory Birds, Beijing 100084, China 

    4 College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China 

    5 Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

  • Received:2025-07-12 Revised:2025-10-20 Accepted:2025-10-21 Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-10-31
  • Contact: Le Yu
  • Supported by:
    the National Key R&D Program of China(2024YFF1307600); the National Natural Science Foundation of China(42401314); Chebaling National Nature Reserve Phenology Monitoring Network Construction and Application Project(CBLHT-2025050); the Investigation Research Program between Ecological Environment and Human Health in Wuyi Mountain(20242120035)

摘要: 本研究聚焦联合国教科文组织“人与生物圈计划”框架下的世界生物圈保护区网络,系统评估其在生态代表性与保护成效方面的全球南北差异。基于全球759个生物圈保护区的空间分布格局,结合1992–2020年生境质量数据与三类全球保护优先区图层,分析其生态演变趋势与代表性特征。结果表明,尽管全球范围内生境质量整体呈下降趋势,但近十年降幅明显减缓,且全球北方保护区的生境状况普遍优于全球南方。在空间代表性方面,生物圈保护区对生物多样性重要区、特有鸟类区与植物多样性中心的覆盖率分别为11.91%、9.76%和9.52%,均显著高于其占全球陆地面积的随机覆盖概率(4.83%),但在热带山区与岛屿等关键区域仍存在明显空缺。上述差异反映出全球南方与北方在保护能力、监测支撑与制度保障等方面的结构性不均衡。面向未来,推进一个更具代表性、公平性与适应性的全球保护体系,将有赖于生物圈保护区在南北差异认知基础上的协同提升。

关键词: 人与生物圈计划, 生物圈保护区, 生物多样性

Abstract

Background: The World Network of Biosphere Reserves (WNBR), established under the framework of UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere Programme  (MAB), plays a key role in linking biodiversity conservation with sustainable development. However, the ecological representativeness and conservation effectiveness of the network remain uneven across the Global South and the Global North. Existing knowledge gaps persist in systematically comparing their performance in habitat protection and spatial coverage of priority biodiversity areas. This study provided a global assessment of the ecological outcomes and spatial representativeness of 759 biosphere reserves, with a particular focus on South–North differences. 

Results: Analysis of habitat quality data from 1992 to 2020 and three global conservation priority layers—Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), Endemic Bird Areas (EBAs), and Centres of Plant Diversity (CPDs)—show that although habitat quality has generally declined over the past three decades, the rate of decline has slowed in the past ten years. Habitat conditions in the Global North have remained more stable and at higher levels than those in the Global South. The coverage of KBAs, EBAs, and CPDs by biosphere reserves reached 11.91%, 9.76%, and 9.52%, respectively, all notably higher than the expected random coverage of 4.83%. 

Problems & Prospects: Despite these positive signals, significant spatial gaps persist in ecologically critical regions—such as tropical mountains and islands—particularly within the Global South. These disparities highlight structural imbalances in monitoring capacity, conservation financing, and institutional support between the Global North and South. Looking ahead, building a more representative, equitable, and adaptive global conservation framework will depend on addressing these South–North differences and advancing the collaborative potential of the WNBR.

Key words: Man and the Biosphere Programme (MAB),  Biosphere Reserves (BRs),  biodiversity