生物多样性 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 24481.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024481  cstr: 32101.14.biods.2024481

• • 上一篇    下一篇

大都市地区的自然留野:趋势与展望

袁琳1*, 王思琦2, 侯静轩3   

  1. 1. 清华大学建筑学院, 北京 100084; 2. 西南民族大学建筑学院, 成都 610225; 3.自然资源部国土空间规划研究中心, 北京 100034
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-31 修回日期:2025-02-09 接受日期:2025-03-11 出版日期:2025-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 袁琳

“Leaving space for wildness” in metropolitan region: Trends and prospects

Lin Yuan1*, Siqi Wang2, Jingxuan Hou3   

  1. 1 School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 

    2 School of Architecture, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610225, China 

    3 Research Center of Territorial Spatial Planning, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100034, China

  • Received:2024-10-31 Revised:2025-02-09 Accepted:2025-03-11 Online:2025-05-20
  • Contact: Lin Yuan

摘要: “留野”作为国土空间维持生物多样性的重要举措, 在支持大都市地区生态可持续和高品质人居环境建设方面同样具有重要意义。当前的大都市地区规划体系对此探讨尚显不足, 而在生态文明体制推进过程中, 这一点尤需重视。本研究以历史的视角, 从大都市地区全域和城区两个尺度梳理了近30年中国大都市地区多类型自然生态空间的发展, 分析了大都市地区全域范围自然保护地与建成区共存格局逐渐增强的态势, 以及核心城区从突出绿色空间与建成区协同拓展到重点培育包含生态保护区的大型郊野公园的发展过程, 综合揭示了当前大都市地区自然留野现象逐步增强的趋势。进而, 研究围绕生态文明体制下的大都市地区规划, 从观念调整、体系发展、机制优化等方面进行了探讨与展望。研究倡导立足大都市地区规划探索系统的“留野区”, 推动相关治理手段的发展, 支持“城野共荣”的未来大都市地区新形态的发展。

关键词: 留野, 大都市地区, 生物多样性, 人居环境

Abstract“Leaving space for wildness” as a critical initiative for maintaining biodiversity within national territorial space, holds significant importance in supporting the construction of ecologically sustainable and high-quality metropolitan regions. However, current metropolitan planning systems have not sufficiently addressed this issue, and it is particularly crucial to emphasize this aspect in the advancement of the ecological civilization system. This study adopts a historical perspective to examine the development of various types of natural ecological spaces in Chinese metropolitan areas over the past 30 years, focusing on both the overall metropolitan region and the urban core. It analyzes the increasingly prominent coexistence pattern between natural protected areas and built-up areas across metropolitan regions, as well as the evolution in core urban areas from emphasizing the coordinated expansion of green spaces and built-up areas to the focused development of large suburban parks that incorporate ecological conservation zones. These findings collectively reveal the gradually strengthening trend of natural wilderness preservation in contemporary metropolitan areas. Furthermore, the study explores and envisions metropolitan planning under the framework of the ecological civilization system, addressing aspects such as conceptual adjustments, system development, and mechanism optimization. It advocates for the exploration of systematic space for wildness within metropolitan planning frameworks, promoting the development of relevant governance tools to support the future emergence of a new metropolitan form characterized by “urban-wilderness coexistence.”

Key words: leaving space for wildness, metropolitan region, biodiversity, human settlements