小麦-玉米轮作农田土壤螨多样性空间分布格局

doi:10.17520/biods.2022292

生物多样性 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 22292. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022292

所属专题：土壤生物与土壤健康

小麦-玉米轮作农田土壤螨多样性空间分布格局

孙佳欢¹^,², 刘冬³, 朱家祺¹^,², 张书宁¹^,², 高梅香¹^,²^,^*()

1.宁波大学地理与空间信息技术系, 浙江宁波 315211
2.宁波市高等学校协同创新中心“宁波陆海国土空间利用与治理协同创新中心”, 浙江宁波 315211
3.中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所, 长春 130102

收稿日期:2022-05-27 接受日期:2022-08-18 出版日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2022-11-05
通讯作者: *E-mail: gaomeixiang@nbu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(42271051);国家自然科学基金(41871042);浙江省公益技术应用研究项目(LGN22D010006);宁波市自然科学基金(2021J129)

Spatial distribution pattern of soil mite community and body size in wheat- maize rotation farmland

Jiahuan Sun¹^,², Dong Liu³, Jiaqi Zhu¹^,², Shuning Zhang¹^,², Meixiang Gao¹^,²^,^*()

1. Department of Geography and Spatial Information Techniques, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211
2. Ningbo Universities Collaborative Innovation Center for Land and Marine Spatial Utilization and Governance Research at Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211
3. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102

Received:2022-05-27 Accepted:2022-08-18 Online:2022-12-20 Published:2022-11-05
Contact: *E-mail: gaomeixiang@nbu.edu.cn

1. 附录1 不同空间尺度下各群落和优势种空间分布的Moran’s I指数.pdf(420KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以农田土壤动物长期监测样地为平台, 阐明土壤动物物种和功能多样性空间分布格局, 是揭示农田土壤动物多样性维持机制、提高农田土壤质量的重要基础。本试验于2020年10月, 对河南商丘农田土壤动物大型固定样地(9 ha)的210个采样点进行土壤样品野外采集和室内分离, 将土壤螨样品鉴定到种并测量其体长体宽数据, 以说明小麦-玉米轮作农田土壤螨多样性及其体长体宽的空间分布格局。结果表明: (1)共捕获成螨个体17,256头, 其中甲螨亚目为优势类群, 其个体数占总捕获量的94.67%; MGP分析表明样地甲螨群落属于P型, 说明受人为因素影响强烈; 生态位宽度和重叠度分析表明, 进化程度越高甲螨的生态位宽度越宽, 进化程度越相近甲螨之间的竞争越激烈。(2) Moran’s I分析显示, 在20-100 m的空间尺度上, 土壤螨群落、优势种的个体数和体长体宽多为显著正相关; 在220-300 m的空间尺度上, 部分为显著负的空间自相关。半方差函数结果表明, 甲螨群落物种数、个体数和体长体宽的空间变异主要受确定性过程影响, 中气门螨群落的空间变异由确定性和随机性过程共同影响。(3)土壤螨个体数与体长体宽存在显著弱的负相关关系, 这种关系普遍存在于土壤螨各群落与优势种中。本研究建议同时开展物种多样性和以体长体宽为代表的功能多样性空间格局研究, 对揭示土壤螨群落维持机制、保护土壤螨多样性具有重要意义。

关键词: 小麦-玉米轮作, 土壤螨, 多样性, 体长, 体宽, 空间格局

Abstract

Aims: Using an agricultural soil permanent plot, we wanted to reveal the spatial distribution patterns of soil organisms and functional diversity, as these are important metrics for maintaining soil organism diversity and improving agricultural soil quality.
Methods: In October 2020, 210 soil samples were collected from a large permanent farmland soil plot (9 ha) in Shangqiu, Henan Province. Soil mites were extracted by Tullgren’s funnel method in the laboratory. The soil mites were identified to species and their body length and width were measured to illustrate both the spatial distribution pattern of species diversity as well as body size of soil mites in wheat-maize rotation farmland.
Results: (1) A total of 17,256 adult mite individuals were captured, of which oribatid mites were the dominant group (94.67%). Results of MGP analysis showed that the oribatid mite community belonged to P-type, indicating that it was strongly affected by human factors. Niche breadth and overlap analysis showed that for higher degrees of evolution, niche width of oribatid mites increased, and for closer degrees of evolution, oribatid mites experienced greater competition. (2) Values of Moran’s I index showed that from 20 m to 100 m, the individuals of dominant soil mite community were significantly positively correlated with body length and body width; yet from 220 m to 300 m, individuals of soil mite community and four dominant species had a negative spatial autocorrelation. A semi-variance function showed that the spatial variation of species, individual number, body length and width of oribatid mites were mainly affected by deterministic processes, while the spatial variation of mesostigmatid mites was affected by both deterministic and stochastic processes. (3) There was a weak negative correlation between the individual number of soil mites and body length and body width, which generally exists in each community and dominant species of soil mites.
Conclusion: This study suggests that the spatial pattern of species and functional diversity represented by mite body length and width should be considered when evaluating maintenance mechanisms of soil mite community and for protecting the diversity of soil mites.

Key words: wheat-maize rotation, soil mites, diversity, body length, body width, spatial pattern

孙佳欢, 刘冬, 朱家祺, 张书宁, 高梅香 (2022) 小麦-玉米轮作农田土壤螨多样性空间分布格局. 生物多样性, 30, 22292. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022292.

Jiahuan Sun, Dong Liu, Jiaqi Zhu, Shuning Zhang, Meixiang Gao (2022) Spatial distribution pattern of soil mite community and body size in wheat- maize rotation farmland. Biodiversity Science, 30, 22292. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022292.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2022292

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2022/V30/I12/22292

图/表 15

图1 商丘农田土壤动物长期监测样地采样点示意图。图中空心圆为采样点; 实心点为样地内水井位置。

Fig. 1 Sampling point of long-term monitoring sample plot of farmland soil animals in Shangqiu, Henan. The hollow circle in the figure is the sampling point, the black spot is the location of the water well in the sample plot.

表1 甲螨群落大类划分

Table 1 Classification of oribatid mite community

群落类型 Community type	甲螨各群落百分比 Percentage of oribatid mite groups
M型 M type	M > 50%
G型 G type	G > 50%
P型 P type	P > 50%
O型 O type	20% < M < 50% & 20% < G < 50% & 20% < P < 50%
MG型 MG type	M, G = 20%-50% & P < 20%
GP型 GP type	G, P = 20%-50% & M < 20%
MP型 MP type	M, P = 20%-50% & G < 20%

图2 各群落物种稀释度曲线

Fig. 2 Species dilution curve of each community

表2 土壤螨各物种名称、数量及其在大样地中的空间变异

Table 2 Species name and number of soil mite and spatial variation of each species in sample area

中文名 Chinese species name	拉丁名 Latin species name	数量 Number	占比 Proportion (%)	Raunkiaer频度 Raunkiaer frequency	变异系数 Coefficient of variation
非凡点肋甲螨	Punctoribates insignis	2,520	14.60	0.84E	1.424
缨菌甲螨爪哇亚种	Scheloribates fimbriatus javensis	4,021	23.30	0.86E	1.701
截合若甲螨	Zygoribatula truncata	273	1.58	0.32B	2.962
尼兰桂奥甲螨	Lauroppia neerlandica	3,653	21.17	0.81E	1.635
阿纳懒甲螨	Nothrus anauniensis	343	1.99	0.28B	2.419
土库曼罗甲螨	Lohmannia turcmenica	2	0.01	0.01A	10.025
覆盖头甲螨	Tectocepheus velatus	397	2.30	0.53C	1.629
圆上罗甲螨	Epilohmannia ovata	1,252	7.26	0.61D	2.008
四川长单翼甲螨	Protoribates sichuanensis	948	5.49	0.49C	1.992
头长单翼甲螨	Protoribates capucinus	2,922	16.93	0.81E	1.838
斜孔全大翼甲螨	Pergalumna altera	1	0.01	0.00A	14.213
姬端三甲螨	Acrotritia ardua	4	0.02	0.01A	8.667
前气门未定种1	Prostigmata sp. 1	4	0.02	0.02A	7.053
前气门未定种2	Prostigmata sp. 2	2	0.01	0.01A	10.025
中气门未定种1	Mesostigmata sp. 1	93	0.54	0.29B	1.975
中气门未定种2	Mesostigmata sp. 2	10	0.06	0.05A	4.393
中气门未定种3	Mesostigmata sp. 3	40	0.23	0.13A	2.896
中气门未定种4	Mesostigmata sp. 4	405	2.35	0.37B	2.586
中气门未定种5	Mesostigmata sp. 5	2	0.01	0.01A	10.025
中气门未定种6	Mesostigmata sp. 6	2	0.01	0.00A	14.213
中气门未定种7	Mesostigmata sp. 7	154	0.89	0.18A	4.222
中气门未定种8	Mesostigmata sp. 8	119	0.69	0.24B	2.669
中气门未定种9	Mesostigmata sp. 9	12	0.07	0.04A	5.214
中气门未定种10	Mesostigmata sp. 10	52	0.30	0.18A	2.490
中气门未定种11	Mesostigmata sp. 11	12	0.07	0.05A	4.642
中气门未定种12	Mesostigmata sp. 12	4	0.02	0.02A	7.053
中气门未定种13	Mesostigmata sp. 13	5	0.03	0.01A	9.374
中气门未定种14	Mesostigmata sp. 14	4	0.02	0.02A	7.053

表2 土壤螨各物种名称、数量及其在大样地中的空间变异

Table 2 Species name and number of soil mite and spatial variation of each species in sample area

中文名 Chinese species name	拉丁名 Latin species name	数量 Number	占比 Proportion (%)	Raunkiaer频度 Raunkiaer frequency	变异系数 Coefficient of variation
非凡点肋甲螨	Punctoribates insignis	2,520	14.60	0.84E	1.424
缨菌甲螨爪哇亚种	Scheloribates fimbriatus javensis	4,021	23.30	0.86E	1.701
截合若甲螨	Zygoribatula truncata	273	1.58	0.32B	2.962
尼兰桂奥甲螨	Lauroppia neerlandica	3,653	21.17	0.81E	1.635
阿纳懒甲螨	Nothrus anauniensis	343	1.99	0.28B	2.419
土库曼罗甲螨	Lohmannia turcmenica	2	0.01	0.01A	10.025
覆盖头甲螨	Tectocepheus velatus	397	2.30	0.53C	1.629
圆上罗甲螨	Epilohmannia ovata	1,252	7.26	0.61D	2.008
四川长单翼甲螨	Protoribates sichuanensis	948	5.49	0.49C	1.992
头长单翼甲螨	Protoribates capucinus	2,922	16.93	0.81E	1.838
斜孔全大翼甲螨	Pergalumna altera	1	0.01	0.00A	14.213
姬端三甲螨	Acrotritia ardua	4	0.02	0.01A	8.667
前气门未定种1	Prostigmata sp. 1	4	0.02	0.02A	7.053
前气门未定种2	Prostigmata sp. 2	2	0.01	0.01A	10.025
中气门未定种1	Mesostigmata sp. 1	93	0.54	0.29B	1.975
中气门未定种2	Mesostigmata sp. 2	10	0.06	0.05A	4.393
中气门未定种3	Mesostigmata sp. 3	40	0.23	0.13A	2.896
中气门未定种4	Mesostigmata sp. 4	405	2.35	0.37B	2.586
中气门未定种5	Mesostigmata sp. 5	2	0.01	0.01A	10.025
中气门未定种6	Mesostigmata sp. 6	2	0.01	0.00A	14.213
中气门未定种7	Mesostigmata sp. 7	154	0.89	0.18A	4.222
中气门未定种8	Mesostigmata sp. 8	119	0.69	0.24B	2.669
中气门未定种9	Mesostigmata sp. 9	12	0.07	0.04A	5.214
中气门未定种10	Mesostigmata sp. 10	52	0.30	0.18A	2.490
中气门未定种11	Mesostigmata sp. 11	12	0.07	0.05A	4.642
中气门未定种12	Mesostigmata sp. 12	4	0.02	0.02A	7.053
中气门未定种13	Mesostigmata sp. 13	5	0.03	0.01A	9.374
中气门未定种14	Mesostigmata sp. 14	4	0.02	0.02A	7.053

表3 各大类(M、G、P型)土壤甲螨群落生态位宽度指数

Table 3 Niche breadth index of different oribatida types

甲螨大类 Oribatid mite group	生态位宽度指数 Niche breadth index
M型甲螨 M type	4.35
阿纳懒甲螨 Nothrus anauniensis	3.66
圆上罗甲螨 Epilohmannia ovata	4.15
G型甲螨 G type	4.54
截合若甲螨 Zygoribatula truncata	3.60
尼兰桂奥甲螨 Lauroppia neerlandica	4.40
覆盖头甲螨 Tectocepheus velatus	4.30
P型甲螨 P type	4.74
非凡点肋甲螨 Punctoribates insignis	4.60
缨菌甲螨爪哇亚种 Scheloribates fimbriatus javensis	4.46
四川长单翼甲螨 Protoribates sichuanensis	4.06
头长单翼甲螨 Protoribates capucinus	4.52

表4 土壤螨各优势种之间的生态位重叠指数。sp1: 非凡点肋甲螨; sp2: 缨菌甲螨爪哇亚种; sp3: 截合若甲螨; sp4: 尼兰桂奥甲螨; sp6: 阿纳懒甲螨; sp8: 覆盖头甲螨; sp10: 圆上罗甲螨; sp11: 四川长单翼甲螨; sp12: 头长单翼甲螨; ZS: 个体数。

Table 4 Niche overlap index between dominant mite species. sp1, Punctoribates insignis; sp2, Schelaribates fimbriatus javensis; sp3, Zygoribatula truncata; sp4, Lauroppia neerlandica; sp6, Nothrus anauniensis; sp8, Tectocepheus velatus; sp10, Epilohmannia ovata; sp11, Protoribates sichuanensis; sp12, Protoribates capucinus; ZS, Number of individuals.

	sp1.ZS	sp2.ZS	sp3.ZS	sp4.ZS	sp6.ZS	sp8.ZS	sp10.ZS	sp11.ZS	sp12.ZS
sp1.ZS	1	0.672	0.199	0.527	0.256	0.622	0.255	0.272	0.365
sp2.ZS		1	0.254	0.494	0.327	0.627	0.373	0.184	0.421
sp3.ZS			1	0.338	0.121	0.330	0.432	0.278	0.510
sp4.ZS				1	0.345	0.568	0.485	0.240	0.510
sp6.ZS					1	0.301	0.295	0.086	0.200
sp8.ZS						1	0.381	0.226	0.459
sp10.ZS							1	0.140	0.594
sp11.ZS								1	0.287
sp12.ZS									1

图3 样地内土壤螨各群落(a)和各优势种(b)的体长体宽。CM: 成螨总体; JM: 甲螨亚目; ZQ: 中气门螨亚目; C: 体长; K: 体宽; sp1: 非凡点肋甲螨; sp2: 缨菌甲螨爪哇亚种; sp4: 尼兰桂奥甲螨; sp12: 头长单翼甲螨。

Fig. 3 Body length and width of each community (a) and dominant species (b) of soil mite in the sample plot. CM, Adult mite population; JM, Oribatida; ZQ, Mesophylla; C, Body length; K, Body width; sp1, Punctoribates insignis; sp2, Schelaribates fimbriatus javensis; sp4, Lauropia neerlandica; sp12, Protorabites capucinus.

图4 物种数量与体长体宽的相关性分析。红框区域展示了土壤螨各群落及优势种个体数与其相对应的体长体宽的相关性。右侧的柱子表示各指标之间相关性系数的正负和强弱。CM: 成螨总体; JM: 甲螨亚目; ZQ: 中气门螨亚目; ZS: 个体数; W: 物种数; C: 体长; K: 体宽; M: M型甲螨; G: G型甲螨; P: P型甲螨; sp1: 非凡点肋甲螨; sp2: 缨菌甲螨爪哇亚种; sp4: 尼兰桂奥甲螨; sp12: 头长单翼甲螨。

Fig. 4 Correlation analysis between species number and body length and width. The red box area shows the correlation between the individual number of each community and dominant species of soil mites and their corresponding body length and width. The column on the right shows the positive and negative correlation coefficients and the strength of each index. CM, Adult mite population; JM, Oribatida; ZQ, Mesophylla; ZS, Number of individuals; W, Number of species; C, Body length; K, Body width; M, M type oribatida; G, G type oribatida; P, P type oribatida; sp1, Punctoribates insignis; sp2, Schelaribates fimbriatus javensis; sp4, Lauropia neerlandica; sp12, Protorabites capucinus.

表5 各群落个体数与体长体宽的关系。ZS: 个体数, 其余标签注释见图3。* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01。

Table 5 Relationship between individual number and body length and width of each community. ZS, Number of individuals. See Fig. 3 for remaining code note. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

	CM_ZS	JM_ZS	ZS_ZS
CM_C	-0.174^*	-0.194^**	0.128
CM_K	-0.101	-0.121	0.159^*
JM_C	-0.252^**	-0.259^**	-0.045
JM_K	-0.203^**	-0.203^**	-0.094
ZQ_C	-0.105	-0.110	0.015
ZQ_K	-0.110	-0.132	0.180^*

表6 各优势种个体数与体长体宽的关系。* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01。标签注释见图4。

Table 6 Relationship between individual number and body length and width of each community. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01. See Fig. 4 for code note.

	sp1.ZS	sp2.ZS	sp4.ZS	sp12.ZS
sp1.K	-0.132	-0.208^**	-0.061	-0.142
sp2.C	-0.306^**	-0.312^**	-0.130	-0.039
sp2.K	-0.120	-0.105	-0.120	0.028
sp4.C	-0.213^**	-0.199^**	-0.039	-0.127
sp4.K	-0.250^**	-0.263^**	-0.067	-0.197^*
sp12.C	-0.230^**	-0.330^**	-0.074	-0.071
sp12.K	-0.198^**	-0.322^**	-0.099	-0.046

图5 土壤螨群落个体数量及体长的Moran’s I系数。* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01。代码注释见图4。

Fig. 5 Moran’s I coefficient of individual number and body length of mite community. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01. See Fig. 4 for code notes.

图6 土壤螨优势种个体数量及体长的Moran’s I系数。* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01。代码注释见图4。

Fig. 6 Moran’s I coefficient of individual number and body length of dominant species of mites. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01. See Fig. 4 for code notes.

图7 土壤螨各群落克里格插值图。代码注释见图4。

Fig. 7 Kriging interpolation map of soil mite communities. See Fig. 4 for code note.

表7 各群落和优势种半方差函数理论模型和空间异质性参数(代码注释见图4)。sph、gau和ste分别为球状模型、高斯模型和Stein’s parameterization模型。

Table 7 Theoretical models of semi-variance functions and spatial heterogeneity parameters for each community and dominant species (see Fig. 4 for code notes). sph, Spherical model; gau, Gaussian model; ste, Stein’s parameterization model.

类型 Type	模型 Model	块金值 Nugget (C₀)	基台值 Sill (C₀+ C)	变程 Range A₀(m)	结构比 Structure ratio [C/(C₀+ C)]
CM_C	ste	0.00	0.01	13.00	1.00
CM_K	ste	0.01	0.02	48.00	0.50
JM_C	ste	0.00	0.01	13.00	1.00
JM_K	ste	0.00	0.02	12.00	1.00
ZQ_C	ste	0.02	0.02	242.00	0.00
ZQ_K	ste	0.03	0.04	120.00	0.25
sp1.C	gau	0.00	0.00	11.00	0.00
sp1.K	gau	0.00	0.01	11.00	1.00
sp2.C	sph	0.00	0.00	7.70	0.00
sp2.K	sph	0.00	0.01	28.00	1.00
sp4.C	ste	0.00	0.01	6.70	1.00
sp4.K	sph	0.01	0.02	30.00	0.50
sp12.C	ste	0.00	0.00	20.00	0.00
sp12.K	sph	0.01	0.01	40.00	0.00
CM_ZS	ste	0.20	1.10	24.00	0.82
JM_ZS	ste	0.05	1.10	20.00	0.95
ZQ_ZS	ste	0.76	1.10	137.00	0.31
sp1.ZS	gau	0.00	1.40	16.00	1.00
sp2.ZS	ste	0.18	1.70	30.00	0.89
sp4.ZS	sph	0.40	2.00	31.00	0.80
sp12.ZS	ste	0.45	1.60	29.00	0.72
CM_W	ste	0.01	0.11	21.00	0.91
JM_W	ste	0.00	0.07	22.00	1.00
ZQ_W	ste	0.16	0.36	32.00	0.56
M_JM	ste	0.00	1.50	51.00	1.00
G_JM	ste	0.00	1.60	14.00	1.00
P_JM	ste	0.00	2.20	25.00	1.00
M_C	ste	0.00	0.04	12.00	1.00
M_K	ste	0.00	0.05	15.00	1.00
G_C	ste	0.00	0.01	9.60	1.00
G_K	ste	0.00	0.02	14.00	1.00
P_C	sph	0.01	0.01	19.00	0.00
P_K	gau	0.01	0.01	11.00	0.00

图8 土壤螨优势种各指标克里格插值图。代码注释见图4。

Fig. 8 Kriging interpolation diagram of indicators of dominant species of soil mites. See Fig. 4 for code notes.

参考文献 55

[1]	Aoki J (1983) Analysis of oribatid communities by relative abundance in the species and individual numbers of the three major groups (MGP-analysis). Bulletin Institute of Environmental Science & Technology, Yokohama National University, 10, 171-176.
[2]	Aupic-Samain A, Baldy V, Lecareux C, Fernandez C, Santonja M (2019) Tree litter identity and predator density control prey and predator demographic parameters in a Mediterranean litter-based multi-trophic system. Pedobiologia, 73, 1-9. DOI
[3]	Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (1999) The relationship between animal abundance and body size: A review of the mechanisms. Advances in Ecological Research, 28, 181-210.
[4]	Brückner A, Heethoff M, Norton RA, Wehner K (2018) Body size structure of oribatid mite communities in different microhabitats. International Journal of Acarology, 44, 367-373. DOI URL
[5]	Caruso T, Taormina M, Migliorini M (2012) Relative role of deterministic and stochastic determinants of soil animal community: A spatially explicit analysis of oribatid mites. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81, 214-221. DOI PMID
[6]	Dolédec S, Chessel D, Gimaret-Carpentier C (2000) Niche separation in community analysis: A new method. Ecology, 81, 2914-2927. DOI URL
[7]	Dong CX, Gao MX, Guo CW, Lin L, Wu DH, Zhang LM (2017) The underlying processes of a soil mite metacommunity on a small scale. PLoS ONE, 12, e0176828.
[8]	Entling W, Schmidt-Entling MH, Bacher S, Brandl R, Nentwig W (2010) Body size-climate relationships of European spiders. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 477-485. DOI URL
[9]	Fang MC, Zhu XM, Du Y, Zhang L, Lin LH (2019) Macroecological patterns of climatic niche breadth variation in lacertid lizards. Asian Herpetological Research, 10(1), 41-47.
[10]	Feng XJ, Mi XC, Xiao ZS, Cao L, Wu H, Ma KP (2019) Overview of Chinese biodiversity observation network (Sino BON). Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 34, 1389-1398. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 冯晓娟, 米湘成, 肖治术, 曹垒, 吴慧, 马克平 (2019) 中国生物多样性监测与研究网络建设及进展. 中国科学院院刊, 34, 1389-1398.]
[11]	Fischer BM, Schatz H (2013) Biodiversity of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) along an altitudinal gradient in the central Alps. Zootaxa, 3626, 429-454. PMID
[12]	Gao MX, He P, Liu D, Guo CW, Zhang XP, Li JK (2014a) Multi-scale spatial autocorrelation of soil mite community in a temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest, Northeast China. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 45, 1104-1112. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 高梅香, 何萍, 刘冬, 郭传伟, 张雪萍, 李景科 (2014a) 温带落叶阔叶林土壤螨群落多尺度空间自相关性. 土壤通报, 45, 1104-1112.]
[13]	Gao MX, Liu D, Wu DH, Zhang XP (2014b) Spatial autocorrelation of aboveground and belowground mite communities in farmland of the Sanjiang Plain. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 51, 1342-1350. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 高梅香, 刘冬, 吴东辉, 张雪萍 (2014b) 三江平原农田地表和地下土壤螨群落空间自相关性研究. 土壤学报, 51, 1342-1350.]
[14]	Gao MX, Sun X, Wu DH, Zhang XP (2014c) Spatial autocorrelation at multi-scale of soil collembolan community in farmland of the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 4980-4990. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 高梅香, 孙新, 吴东辉, 张雪萍 (2014c) 三江平原农田土壤跳虫多尺度空间自相关性. 生态学报, 34, 4980-4990.]
[15]	Gao MX, Liu D, Zhang XP, Wu DH (2016) Spatial relationships between the abundance of aboveground and belowground soil mite communities, and environmental factors in a farmland on the Sanjiang Plain, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 1782-1792. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 高梅香, 刘冬, 张雪萍, 吴东辉 (2016) 三江平原农田地表和地下土壤螨类丰富度与环境因子的空间关联性. 生态学报, 36, 1782-1792.]
[16]	Gao MX, Cheng SS, Ni JP, Lin L, Lu TY, Wu DH (2017) Negative spatial and coexistence patterns and species associations are uncommon for carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) at a small scale. European Journal of Soil Biology, 83, 52-57. DOI URL
[17]	Gao MX, Lin L, Chang L, Sun X, Liu D, Wu DH (2018) Spatial patterns and assembly rules in soil fauna communities: A review. Biodiversity Science, 26, 1034-1050. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[ 高梅香, 林琳, 常亮, 孙新, 刘冬, 吴东辉 (2018) 土壤动物群落空间格局和构建机制研究进展. 生物多样性, 26, 1034-1050.] DOI
[18]	Gao MX, Sun X, Qiao ZH, Hou HY, Lu TY, Wu DH, Jin GZ (2018) Distinct patterns suggest that assembly processes differ for dominant arthropods in above-ground and below-ground ecosystems. Pedobiologia, 69, 17-28. DOI URL
[19]	Gao MX, Qiao ZH, Hou HY, Jin GZ, Wu DH (2020) Factors that affect the assembly of ground-dwelling beetles at small scales in primary mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forests in north-east China. Soil Ecology Letters, 2, 47-60. DOI
[20]	Gao MX, Liu QL, Zhu JQ, Zhao BY, Du J, Wu DH (2022) Implementation protocol of scientific investigation and monitoring for permanent plots of agricultural soil animal in China. Biodiversity Science, 30, 101-115. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 高梅香, 刘启龙, 朱家祺, 赵博宇, 杜嘉, 吴东辉 (2022) 中国农田土壤动物长期监测样地科学调查监测的实施方法. 生物多样性, 30, 101-115.]
[21]	Geisen S, Wall DH,van der Putten WH (2019) Challenges and opportunities for soil biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Current Biology, 29, 1036-1044. DOI PMID
[22]	Griffith DA (2003) Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering: Gaining understanding through theory and scientific visualization. Journal of Regional Science, 44, 633-635.
[23]	Hasegawa M (2001) The relationship between the organic matter composition of a forest floor and the structure of a soil arthropod community. European Journal of Soil Biology, 37, 281-284. DOI URL
[24]	Hernández P, Fernández R, Novo M, Trigo D, Díaz Cosín DJ(2007) Geostatistical and multivariate analysis of the horizontal distribution of an earthworm community in El Molar (Madrid, Spain). Pedobiologia, 51, 13-21. DOI URL
[25]	Hu YY, Zhu JY, Yan L, Cao Y, Gao MX, Lu TY (2018) Analysis of the dynamic spatial pattern of adult Coleoptera communities at fine scale in a temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 1841-1851. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 胡媛媛, 朱纪元, 闫龙, 曹阳, 高梅香, 卢廷玉 (2018) 温带落叶阔叶林地表鞘翅目成虫小尺度空间格局动态分析. 生态学报, 38, 1841-1851.]
[26]	Ingimarsdóttir M, Caruso T, Ripa J, Magnúsdóttir ÓB, Migliorini M, Hedlund K (2012) Primary assembly of soil communities: Disentangling the effect of dispersal and local environment. Oecologia, 170, 745-754. DOI PMID
[27]	Jiménez JJ, Decaëns T, Amézquita E, Rao I, Thomas RJ, Lavelle P (2011) Short-range spatial variability of soil physico-chemical variables related to earthworm clustering in a neotropical gallery forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 1071-1080. DOI URL
[28]	Krantz GW, Walter DE (2009) A Manual of Acarology, 3rd edn. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas.
[29]	Lawton JH (1990) Species richness and population dynamics of animal assemblages. Patterns in body size: Abundance space. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 330, 283-291.
[30]	Lin L, Gao MX, Liu D, Zhang XP, Wu HT, Wu DH (2014) Co-occurrence patterns of above-ground and below-ground mite communities in farmland of Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Chinese Geographical Science, 24, 339-347. DOI URL
[31]	Lin LH, Zhu XM, Du Y, Fang MC, Ji X (2018) Global, regional, and cladistic patterns of variation in climatic niche breadths in terrestrial elapid snakes. Current Zoology, 65, 1-9. DOI URL
[32]	Liu D (2021) Biodiversity in Jilin Province•Fauna•Suborder Oribatida Volume (Arachnida: Acari). Jilin Education Publishing House, Changchun. (in Chinese)
	[ 刘冬 (2021) 吉林省生物多样性•动物志•甲螨亚目. 吉林教育出版社, 长春.]
[33]	Liu J, Gao MX, Liu JW, Guo YX, Liu D, Zhu XY, Wu DH(2018) Spatial distribution patterns of soil mite communities and their relationships with edaphic factors in a 30-year tillage cornfield in Northeast China. PLoS ONE, 13, e0199093.
[34]	Liu J, Gao MX, Ma YL, Sun X, Zhu XY, Adl S, Wu DH (2019) Spatial and environmental factors are minor structuring forces in a soil Collembola metacommunity in a maize agroecosystem. Pedobiologia, 76, 150572. DOI URL
[35]	Liu J, Gao MX, Wu DH (2017) Characteristics of ground-dwelling soil macro-arthropod communities in a biodiversity monitoring plot of black soil cropland, northeastern China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 3965-3975. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[ 刘洁, 高梅香, 吴东辉 (2017) 基于黑土农田生物多样性监测样地的地表大型节肢动物群落特征. 应用生态学报, 28, 3965-3975.] DOI
[36]	Mori AS, Ota AT, Fujii S, Seino T, Kabeya D, Okamoto T, Ito MT, Kaneko N, Hasegawa M (2015) Concordance and discordance between taxonomic and functional homogenization: Responses of soil mite assemblages to forest conversion. Oecologia, 179, 527-535. DOI PMID
[37]	Pianka ER (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 53-74. DOI URL
[38]	Procheş Ş, Warren M, McGeoch MA, Marshall DJ (2010) Spatial scaling and transition in pneumatophore arthropod communities. Ecography, 33, 128-136. DOI URL
[39]	Qiao ZH, Hou HY, Gao MX, Lu TY, Jin GZ, Wu DH (2019) Spatial heterogeneity of ground-dwelling Staphylinidae community in a broadleaved and Korean pine forest in Liangshui Nature Reserve, Northeast China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 38, 500-512. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 乔志宏, 侯宏宇, 高梅香, 卢廷玉, 金光泽, 吴东辉 (2019) 小兴安岭凉水阔叶红松林地表隐翅虫群落空间异质性. 生态学杂志, 38, 500-512.]
[40]	Raunkiaer C, Gilbert-Carter H, Fausbøll A, Tansley AG (1934) The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. The Clarendon Press, Oxford.
[41]	Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423. DOI URL
[42]	Si XF, Pimm S, Russell G, Ding P (2014) Turnover of breeding bird communities on islands in an inundated lake. Journal of Biogeography, 41, 2283-2292. DOI URL
[43]	Stroik LK (2014) Dietary competition in an extant mammalian guild: Application of a quantitative method to evaluate reconstructed niche overlap in paleocommunities. International Journal of Primatology, 35, 1222-1252. DOI URL
[44]	Tong FC, Wu ZH, Lin RX, Wu XJ, Deng HF, Yuan QY, Luan JW, Xiao YH (2022) Effects of Phyllostachys edulis expansion on soil oribatid mite community structure. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 50(2), 59-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 佟富春, 吴智华, 林瑞雪, 吴晓君, 邓惠方, 袁千允, 栾军伟, 肖以华 (2022) 毛竹扩张对土壤甲螨群落结构的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 50(2), 59-64.]
[45]	Ulrich W (2007) Body weight distributions of central European Coleoptera. European Journal of Entomology, 104, 769-776. DOI URL
[46]	Wang F, Chen BZ, Chen J, Zhang HF, Guo LF (2022) Comparative study of DLM and CLM5 model simulations at winter wheat-summer maize rotation stations in the North China Plain. Progress in Geography, 41, 289-303. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[ 王菲, 陈报章, 陈婧, 张慧芳, 郭立峰 (2022) 华北平原冬小麦-夏玉米轮作区DLM与CLM5模型模拟对比研究. 地理科学进展, 41, 289-303.] DOI
[47]	Wang YT, Zhang Y, Du YF, Wang X, Zhao TQ, Gu C, Chen WJ, Zhao ML (2017) Spatial heterogeneity of soil moisture in Stipa breviflora grasslands under different stocking rates. Pratacultural Science, 34, 1159-1167. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王亚婷, 张宇, 杜宇凡, 王玺, 赵天启, 古琛, 陈万杰, 赵萌莉 (2017) 不同载畜率下短花针茅草原土壤水分空间异质性的分析. 草业科学, 34, 1159-1167.]
[48]	Wang ZJ, Li DM, Shang HW, Cheng JA (2002) Theories and methods of geostatistics and their application in insect ecology. Entomological Knowledge, 39, 405-411. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王正军, 李典谟, 商晗武, 程家安 (2002) 地质统计学理论与方法及其在昆虫生态学中的应用. 昆虫知识, 39, 405-411.]
[49]	Xiao MM, Zhang HJ, Zhao F, Liu JH, Li R, Chen W, Xie XS (2021) Diversity analysis of rhizosphere microbial in wheat/maize rotation field. Microbiology China, 48, 4612-4623. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 肖苗苗, 张红娟, 赵芳, 刘杰辉, 李蓉, 陈伟, 谢咸升 (2021) 小麦/玉米轮作田根际微生物多样性分析. 微生物学通报, 48, 4612-4623.]
[50]	Xie ZJ, Chang L, Stefan S, Wu DH, Sun X (2022) Taxonomic and functional diversity of Collembola in litter and soil along an altitudinal gradient at Changbai Mountain, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42, 3471-3481. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 谢致敬, 常亮, Stefan S, 吴东辉, 孙新 (2022) 长白山森林生态系统凋落物层和土壤层跳虫物种多样性和功能多样性对海拔梯度的响应. 生态学报, 42, 3471-3481.]
[51]	Xu GL, Kuster TM, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Dobbertin M, Li MH (2012) Seasonal exposure to drought and air warming affects soil Collembola and mites. PLoS ONE, 7, e43102.
[52]	Yin WY, Hu SH, Shen YF, Ning YZ, Sun XD, Wu JH, Zhuge Y, Zhang YM, Wang M, Chen JY, Xu CG, Liang YL, Wang HZ, Yang T, Chen DN, Zhang GQ, Song DX, Chen J, Liang LR, Hu CY, Wang HF, Zhang CZ, Kuang PR, Chen GX, Zhao LJ, Xie RD, Zhang J, Liu XW, Han MZ, Bi DY, Xiao NN, Yang DR (1998) Pictorical Keys to Soil Animals of China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 尹文英, 胡圣豪, 沈韫芬, 宁应之, 孙希达, 吴纪华, 诸葛燕, 张云美, 王敏, 陈建英, 徐成钢, 梁彦龄, 王洪铸, 杨潼, 陈德牛, 张国庆, 宋大祥, 陈军, 梁来荣, 胡成业, 王慧芙, 张崇州, 匡溥人, 陈国孝, 赵立军, 谢荣栋, 张骏, 刘宪伟, 韩美贞, 毕道英, 肖宁年, 杨大荣 (1998) 中国土壤动物检索图鉴. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[53]	Yin XQ, Wang HX, Zhou DW (2003) Characteristics of soil animals’ communities in different agricultural ecosystem in the Songnen Grassland of China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23, 1071-1078. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 殷秀琴, 王海霞, 周道玮 (2003) 松嫩草原区不同农业生态系统土壤动物群落特征. 生态学报, 23, 1071-1078.]
[54]	Yonker CM, Schimel DS, Paroussis E, Heil RD (1988) Patterns of organic carbon accumulation in a semiarid shortgrass steppe, Colorado. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 52, 478-483. DOI URL
[55]	Zhu JY, Li JK, Gao MX, Hu YY, Zhang XP (2017) Spatially heterogeneous dynamics of adult Coleoptera communities at a small scale in a Pinus koraiensis plantation on Maoer Mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 1975-1986. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 朱纪元, 李景科, 高梅香, 胡媛媛, 张雪萍 (2017) 帽儿山红松人工林鞘翅目成虫群落小尺度空间异质性变化特征. 生态学报, 37, 1975-1986.]

小麦-玉米轮作农田土壤螨多样性空间分布格局

Spatial distribution pattern of soil mite community and body size in wheat- maize rotation farmland

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 55

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何智荣, 吴思雨, 时莹莹, 王雨婷, 江艺欣, 张春娜, 赵娜, 王苏盆. 壶菌及其感染对两栖动物种群影响的研究现状与挑战[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23274-.
[2]	彭昀月, 靳彤, 张小全. 生物多样性信用的概念、原则、交易和挑战[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23300-.
[3]	吴相獐, 雷富民, 单壹壹, 于晶. 上海城市公园苔藓植物多样性分布格局及其环境影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23364-0.
[4]	张飞飞, 杨天凤, 陈莉荣, 刘冬梅, 杨柳园, 杨杜宇, 鞠鹏, 陆露. 被子植物花粉颜色多样性及应用研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23346-.
[5]	刘昱齐, 刘晶岚, 樊晓丽, 胡宜深, 郭鸿筱, 薛凡. 鸟鸣多样性感知与声景感知恢复性: 鸟鸣音频和科普的干预[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23230-.
[6]	刘彩莲, 张雄, 樊恩源, 王松林, 姜艳, 林柏岸, 房璐, 李玉强, 刘乐彬, 刘敏. 中国海域海马的物种多样性、生态特征及保护建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23282-.
[7]	韩丽霞, 王永健, 刘宣. 外来物种入侵与本土物种分布区扩张的异同[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23396-.
[8]	程卓, 林晨, 龙春林. 独龙族传统生计及其生物多样性管理[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23019-.
[9]	李庆多, 栗冬梅. 全球蝙蝠巴尔通体流行状况分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23166-.
[10]	李勇, 李三青, 王欢. 天津野生维管植物编目及分布数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23128-.
[11]	段晓敏, 李佳佳, 李靖宇, 李艳楠, 袁存霞, 王英娜, 刘建利. 腾格里沙漠东南缘藓结皮植物-土壤连续体不同粒径土壤微生物群落多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23131-.
[12]	陈进. 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》与国家植物园体系建设[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23257-.
[13]	冯晨, 张洁, 黄宏文. 统筹植物就地保护与迁地保护的解决方案: 植物并地保护(parallel situ conservation)[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23184-.
[14]	陈慧妹, 李文军, 邱娟, 马占仓, 李波, 杨宗宗, 闻志彬, 孟岩, 曹秋梅, 邱东, 刘丹辉, 金光照. 新疆野生维管植物名录[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23124-.
[15]	宋柱秋, 叶文, 董仕勇, 金梓超, 钟星杰, 王震, 张步云, 徐晔春, 陈文俐, 李世晋, 姚纲, 徐洲锋, 廖帅, 童毅华, 曾佑派, 曾云保, 陈又生. 广东省高等植物多样性编目和分布数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23177-.