莱州湾大型砂壳纤毛虫群落季节变化

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13257

生物多样性 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 649-657. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13257

所属专题：海洋生物多样性

莱州湾大型砂壳纤毛虫群落季节变化

陈雪^1,³, 张武昌^1,^*(), 吴强², 栾青杉², 肖天¹

1 中国科学院海洋研究所海洋生态与环境重点实验室, 山东青岛 266071
2 中国水产科学院黄海水产研究所海洋可捕资源评估与生态系统实验室, 山东青岛 266071
3 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2013-12-11 接受日期:2014-04-17 出版日期:2014-09-20 发布日期:2014-10-09
通讯作者: 张武昌
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2011CB409804)和国家自然科学基金(U1406403)

Seasonal change of the community of large-sized tintinnids (Ciliophora, Tintinnida) in Laizhou Bay

Xue Chen^1,³, Wuchang Zhang^1,^*(), Qiang Wu², Qingshan Luan², Tian Xiao¹

1 Key Laboratory of Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong 266071
2 Laboratory of Stock Assessment and Ecosystem, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong 266071
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received:2013-12-11 Accepted:2014-04-17 Online:2014-09-20 Published:2014-10-09
Contact: Zhang Wuchang

1. 附图1 莱州湾3–11月表层温度(°C)和盐度的变化.pdf(134KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为揭示莱州湾砂壳纤毛虫群落季节变化规律, 在莱州湾设置8个站位, 于2011年5-11月及2012年3-4月进行了9个航次的调查, 用浅海III型浮游生物网由底至表垂直拖网采集砂壳纤毛虫。结果表明, 莱州湾3-11月砂壳纤毛虫物种丰富度的变化范围为5-19, 周年变化呈现一峰两谷的趋势。丰度的范围为0-318 ind./L, 丰度较大(> 50 ind./L)的种类有运动类铃虫(Codonellopsis mobilis)和清兰拟铃虫(Tintinnopsis chinglanensis)。各月平均丰度随时间的变化趋势为双峰型, 最大值出现在7月(63 ind./L), 次峰值出现在5月(48 ind./L), 最小值出现在3月(2 ind./L)。黏着壳种类在3-11月均有出现, 透明壳种类仅在温度较高(> 15°C)的6-9月出现。各月的优势种数目为1种(5月)到8种(8月), 其中运动类铃虫在所有月中都是优势种, 对砂壳纤毛虫丰度周年的变化规律产生较大影响。使用各月所有种类的平均丰度对各月砂壳纤毛虫群落进行聚类分析, 得到两个群落(相似度30%): 群落I(7-9月)和群落II(3-6月、10-11月), 说明砂壳纤毛虫群落发生了明显的季节变化。砂壳纤毛虫的物种丰富度、丰度与环境因子(温度、盐度)均没有明显的相关性。

关键词: 砂壳纤毛虫, 群落, 周年变化, 莱州湾

Abstract

The abundance and seasonal change of large-sized tintinnids were studied in Laizhou Bay. Large-sized tintinnids were collected by vertical towing using a shallow sea type III plankton net (open area 0.1 m², mesh size 76 μm) during 9 cruises between May and November of 2011 and from March to April, 2012. The samples were fixed in formalin solution to a final concentration of 5% and counted using an inverted microscope in the laboratory. We sampled 8 stations to avoid fluctuations over a short time period. The purpose of this study was to characterize seasonal change of the large-sized tintinnid community. Maximum tintinnid species richness was 19 in August and minimum was 5 in May. Tintinnid abundance ranged from 0 ind./L to 318 ind./L. Average abundance at all stations was highest (63 ind./L) in July and lowest (2 ind./L) in March, and there was a secondary peak of 48 ind./L in May. The abundance of Codonellopsis mobilis and Tintinnopsis chinglanensis were more than 50 ind./L. Agglutinated species occurred from March to November, while the hyaline species only occurred from June to September when the temperature was > 15°C. Codonellopsis mobilis occurred from March to November. The number of dominant species ranged from 1 in May, to 8 in August. Codonellopsis mobilis was a dominant species during all time periods and this one species significantly influenced the pattern of total ciliate abundance. Using the average abundance data of 8 stations, two distinct cluster groups were observed (30% similarity): cluster I (July to September) and cluster II (March to June, October to November). The cluster results showed that there was a seasonal change of the large-sized tintinnid community. Average abundance and species richness were not significantly correlated with temperature and salinity.

Key words: Tintinnid, community, seasonal change, Laizhou Bay

陈雪, 张武昌, 吴强, 栾青杉, 肖天 (2014) 莱州湾大型砂壳纤毛虫群落季节变化. 生物多样性, 22, 649-657. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13257.

Xue Chen, Wuchang Zhang, Qiang Wu, Qingshan Luan, Tian Xiao (2014) Seasonal change of the community of large-sized tintinnids (Ciliophora, Tintinnida) in Laizhou Bay. Biodiversity Science, 22, 649-657. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13257.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13257

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2014/V22/I5/649

图/表 10

参考文献 33

[1]	.Abboud-Abi Saab M (1989) Distribution and ecology of tintinnids in the plankton of Lebanese coastal waters (eastern Mediterranean). Journal of Plankton Research, 11, 203-222.
[2]	.Abboud-Abi Saab M (2002) Annual cycle of the micro- zooplankton communities in the waters surrounding the Palm Island Nature Reserve (north Lebanon), with special attention to tintinnids. Mediterranean Marine Science, 3, 55-76.
[3]	.Azam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Gray JS, Meyer-Reil LA, Thingstad F (1983) The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 10, 257-263.
[4]	.Bojanić N (2001) Seasonal distribution of the ciliated protozoa in Kastela Bay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 81, 383-390.
[5]	.Bojanić N, Šolić M, Krstulović N, Šestanović S, Marasović I, Ninčević Ž (2005) Temporal variability in abundance and biomass of ciliates and copepods in the eutrophicated part of Kaštela Bay (Middle Adriatic Sea). Helgoland Marine Research, 59, 107-120.
[6]	.Dolan JR (1991) Guilds of ciliate microzooplankton in the Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 33, 137-152.
[7]	.Dolan JR, Gallegos CL (2001) Estuarine diversity of tintinnids (planktonic ciliates). Journal of Plankton Research, 23, 1009-1027.
[8]	.Dolan JR, Montagnes DJ, Agatha S, Coats DW, Stoecker DK (2013) The Biology and Ecology of Tintinnid Ciliates: Models for Marine Plankton. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
[9]	.Elliott DT, Kaufmann RS (2007) Spatial and temporal variability of mesozooplankton and tintinnid ciliates in a seasonally hypersaline estuary. Estuaries and Coasts, 30, 418-430.
[10]	.Gold K, Morales EA (1975) Seasonal changes in lorica sizes and the species of Tintinnida in the New York Bight. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 22, 520-528.
[11]	.Graziano C (1989) On the ecology of tintinnids (Ciliophora: Oligotrichida) in the North Irish Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 29, 233-245.
[12]	.Kamiyama T, Tsujino M (1996) Seasonal variation in the species composition of tintinnid ciliates in Hiroshima Bay, the Seto Inland Sea of Japan. Journal of Plankton Research, 18, 2313-2327.
[13]	.Kofoid CA, Campbell AS (1929) A Conspectus of the Marine and Fresh-water Ciliata Belonging to the Suborder Tintinnoinea: with Descriptions of New Species Principally from the Agassiz Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific 1904-1905. University of California, Publications in Zoology, 34, 1-403.
[14]	.Kofoid CA, Campbell AS (1939) The Ciliata: the Tintinnoinea. Reports on the Scientific Results of the Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific 1904-1905. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 84, 1473.
[15]	.Laval-Peuto M, Heinbokel JF, Anderson OR, Rassoulzadegan F, Sherr BF (1986) Role of micro- and nanozooplankton in marine food webs. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 7, 387-395.
[16]	.Leakey R, Burkill PH, Sleigh M (1993) Planktonic ciliates in Southampton Water: quantitative taxonomic studies. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United King- dom, 73, 579-594.
[17]	.Modigh M, Castaldo S (2002) Variability and persistence in tintinnid assemblages at a Mediterranean coastal site. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 28, 299-311.
[18]	.Montagnes D, Lynn D, Roff J, Taylor W (1988) The annual cycle of heterotrophic planktonic ciliates in the waters surrounding the Isles of Shoals, Gulf of Maine: an assessment of their trophic role. Marine Biology, 99, 21-30.
[19]	.Pielou EC (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, 131-144.
[20]	.Pierce RW (1992) Ecology of planktonic ciliates in marine food webs. Reviews in Aquatic Sciences, 6, 139-181.
[21]	.Pierce RW, Turner JT (1994) Plankton studies in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts, USA. IV. Tintinnids, 1987 to 1988. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 112, 235-240.
[22]	.Sanders RW (1987) Tintinnids and other microzooplankton: seasonal distributions and relationships to resources and Hydrography in a Maine estuary. Journal of Plankton Research, 9, 65-77.
[23]	.Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
[24]	.Sitran R, Bergamasco A, Decembrini F, Guglielmo L (2007) Temporal succession of tintinnids in the northern Ionian Sea, central Mediterranean. Journal of Plankton Research, 29, 495-508.
[25]	.Sun J (孙军), Liu DY (刘东艳) (2003) The application of diversity indices in marine phytoplankton studies. Acta Oceanologica Sinica(海洋学报), 26, 62-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	.Urrutxurtu I, Orive E, de la Sota A (2003) Seasonal dynamics of ciliated protozoa and their potential food in an eutrophic estuary (Bay of Biscay). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 57, 1169-1182.
[27]	.Vaqué D, Blough H, Duarte C (1997) Dynamics of ciliate abundance, biomass and community composition in an oligotrophic coastal environment (NW Mediterranean). Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 12, 71-83.
[28]	.Verity PG (1987) Abundance, community composition, size distribution, and production rates of tintinnids in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 24, 671-690.
[29]	.Witek M (1998) Annual changes of abundance and biomass of planktonic ciliates in the Gdańsk Basin, southern Baltic. International Review of Hydrobiology, 83, 163-182.
[30]	.Xu ZL (徐兆礼), Chen YQ (陈亚瞿) (1989) Aggregated intensity of dominant species of zooplankton in autumn in the East China Sea and Yellow Sea. Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 4, 13-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	.Yu Y (于莹), Zhang WC (张武昌), Zhao N (赵楠), Sun XX (孙晓霞), Zhang CX (张翠霞), Feng MP (丰美萍), Xiao T (肖天) (2011) Annual variations in the abundance and biomass of planktonic ciliate in the Jiaozhou Bay. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica(海洋与湖沼), 42, 690-701. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	.Zhang WC (张武昌), Wang R (王荣) (2000) Microzooplank- ton and their grazing pressure on phytoplankton in Bohai Sea. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica(海洋与湖沼), 31, 252-258. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	.Zhang WC (张武昌), Feng MP (丰美萍), Yu Y (于莹), Zhang CX (张翠霞), Xiao T (肖天) (2012) An Illustrated Guide to Contemporary Tintinnids in the World (砂壳纤毛虫图谱). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)

中文种名 Chinese name	拉丁文种名 Latin name	A_max	M_max
透明壳种类 Hyaline species
尖底类瓮虫	Amphorellopsis acuta	2.81	8
卢氏真铃虫	Eutintinnus lusus-undae	2.53	7
巴拿马网纹虫	Favella panamensis	4.21	6
黏着壳种类 Agglutinated species
鲁西塔尼亚类铃虫	Codonellopsis lusitanica	1.04	8
运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	316.72	5
诺氏薄铃虫	Leprotintinnus nordqvisti	0.42	7
简单薄铃虫	L. simplex	7.67	7
白领细壳虫	Stenosemella nivalis	16.93	7
巴西拟铃虫	Tintinnopsis brasiliensis	1.04	3
布氏拟铃虫	T. butschlii	1.18	7
清兰拟铃虫	T. chinglanensis	65.85	7
有角拟铃虫	T. corniger	3.87	7
指状拟铃虫	T. digita	9.44	8
直颈拟铃虫	T. directa	0.53	7
半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	3.85	11
日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	14.21	4
卡拉直克拟铃虫	T. karajacensis	0.20	3
罗氏拟铃虫	T. lohmanni	6.15	7
梅氏拟铃虫	T. mayeri	0.11	4
根状拟铃虫	T. radix	29.14	7
圆锥拟铃虫	T. rapa	0.59	3
斯氏拟铃虫	T. schotti	12.43	9
妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	13.38	8
未定种1	Tintinnopsis sp.1	4.84	5
未定种2	Tintinnopsis sp.2	0.39	6
未定种3	Tintinnopsis sp.3	0.80	8

中文种名 Chinese name	拉丁文种名 Latin name	A_max	M_max
透明壳种类 Hyaline species
尖底类瓮虫	Amphorellopsis acuta	2.81	8
卢氏真铃虫	Eutintinnus lusus-undae	2.53	7
巴拿马网纹虫	Favella panamensis	4.21	6
黏着壳种类 Agglutinated species
鲁西塔尼亚类铃虫	Codonellopsis lusitanica	1.04	8
运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	316.72	5
诺氏薄铃虫	Leprotintinnus nordqvisti	0.42	7
简单薄铃虫	L. simplex	7.67	7
白领细壳虫	Stenosemella nivalis	16.93	7
巴西拟铃虫	Tintinnopsis brasiliensis	1.04	3
布氏拟铃虫	T. butschlii	1.18	7
清兰拟铃虫	T. chinglanensis	65.85	7
有角拟铃虫	T. corniger	3.87	7
指状拟铃虫	T. digita	9.44	8
直颈拟铃虫	T. directa	0.53	7
半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	3.85	11
日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	14.21	4
卡拉直克拟铃虫	T. karajacensis	0.20	3
罗氏拟铃虫	T. lohmanni	6.15	7
梅氏拟铃虫	T. mayeri	0.11	4
根状拟铃虫	T. radix	29.14	7
圆锥拟铃虫	T. rapa	0.59	3
斯氏拟铃虫	T. schotti	12.43	9
妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	13.38	8
未定种1	Tintinnopsis sp.1	4.84	5
未定种2	Tintinnopsis sp.2	0.39	6
未定种3	Tintinnopsis sp.3	0.80	8

	优势种 Dominant species		优势度 Dominance		优势种 Dominant species		优势度 Dominance
3月	日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.293	8月	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.179
	半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.100		清兰拟铃虫	T. chinglanensis	0.129
	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.065		妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	0.095
	指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.065		指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.077
	巴西拟铃虫	T. brasiliensis	0.065		运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.045
4月	日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.637		日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.044
	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.288		罗氏拟铃虫	T. lohmanni	0.040
5月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.979		根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.031
				9月	斯氏拟铃虫	T. schotti	0.220
6月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.581		有角拟铃虫	T. corniger	0.042
	巴拿马网纹虫	F. panamensis	0.189		半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.033
		Tintinnopsis sp.1	0.049		指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.032
7月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.305		根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.024
	根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.157	10月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.496
	清兰拟铃虫	T.chinglanensis	0.086		白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.349
	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.075	11月	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.445
	妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	0.067		半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.267
	简单薄铃虫	L. simplex	0.033		运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.215
					日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.030

	优势种 Dominant species		优势度 Dominance		优势种 Dominant species		优势度 Dominance
3月	日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.293	8月	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.179
	半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.100		清兰拟铃虫	T. chinglanensis	0.129
	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.065		妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	0.095
	指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.065		指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.077
	巴西拟铃虫	T. brasiliensis	0.065		运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.045
4月	日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.637		日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.044
	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.288		罗氏拟铃虫	T. lohmanni	0.040
5月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.979		根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.031
				9月	斯氏拟铃虫	T. schotti	0.220
6月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.581		有角拟铃虫	T. corniger	0.042
	巴拿马网纹虫	F. panamensis	0.189		半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.033
		Tintinnopsis sp.1	0.049		指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.032
7月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.305		根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.024
	根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.157	10月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.496
	清兰拟铃虫	T.chinglanensis	0.086		白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.349
	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.075	11月	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.445
	妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	0.067		半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.267
	简单薄铃虫	L. simplex	0.033		运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.215
					日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.030

	3月 March	4月 April	5月 May	6月 June	7月 July	8月 August	9月 September	10月 October	11月 November
种丰富度 Species richness	10	7	5	11	18	19	12	6	10
均匀度指数 Evenness index (J)	0.78±0.15	0.62±0.18	0.40±0.30	0.59±0.19	0.57±0.13	0.72±0.08	0.76±0.26	0.55±0.18	0.69±0.11
多样性指数 Diversity index (H')	1.71±0.60	1.00±0.23	0.42±0.29	1.33±0.34	2.06±0.50	2.38±0.32	1.45±0.75	1.04±0.46	1.71±0.36

莱州湾大型砂壳纤毛虫群落季节变化

Seasonal change of the community of large-sized tintinnids (Ciliophora, Tintinnida) in Laizhou Bay

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程建伟, 徐满厚, 窦永静, 王亚东, 王桠楠, 刘新民, 李永宏. 内蒙古典型草原马粪分解过程中节肢动物群落的季节动态变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24018-.
[2]	郑梦瑶, 李媛, 王雪蓉, 张越, 贾彤. 芦芽山不同植被类型土壤原生动物群落构建机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23419-.
[3]	曲锐, 左振君, 王有鑫, 张良键, 吴志刚, 乔秀娟, 王忠. 基于元素组的生物地球化学生态位及其在不同生态系统中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23378-.
[4]	李斌, 宋鹏飞, 顾海峰, 徐波, 刘道鑫, 江峰, 梁程博, 张萌, 高红梅, 蔡振媛, 张同作. 昆仑山青海片区鸟类群落多样性格局及其驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23406-.
[5]	冯志荣, 陈明波, 杨小芳, 王刚, 董乙乂, 彭艳琼, 陈华燕, 王波. 榕树繁育系统及榕小蜂资源利用塑造了榕小蜂群落[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23307-.
[6]	倪艳梅, 陈莉, 董志远, 孙德斌, 李宝泉, 王绪敏, 陈琳琳. 黄河三角洲湿地生态修复区大型底栖动物群落结构与生态健康评价[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23303-.
[7]	陈瑶琪, 郭晶晶, 蔡国俊, 葛依立, 廖宇, 董正, 符辉. 近七十年(1954-2021)长江中下游湖泊沉水植物群落多样性演变特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23319-.
[8]	魏嘉欣, 姜治国, 杨林森, 熊欢欢, 金胶胶, 罗方林, 李杰华, 吴浩, 徐耀粘, 乔秀娟, 魏新增, 姚辉, 余辉亮, 杨敬元, 江明喜. 湖北神农架中亚热带山地落叶阔叶林25 ha动态监测样地群落物种组成与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23338-.
[9]	刘啸林, 吴友贵, 张敏华, 陈小荣, 朱志成, 陈定云, 董舒, 李步杭, 丁炳扬, 刘宇. 浙江百山祖25 ha亚热带森林动态监测样地群落组成与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23294-.
[10]	张楚然, 李生发, 李逢昌, 唐志忠, 刘辉燕, 王丽红, 顾荣, 邓云, 张志明, 林露湘. 云南鸡足山亚热带半湿润常绿阔叶林20 ha动态监测样地木本植物生境关联与群落数量分类[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23393-.
[11]	杨舒涵, 王贺, 陈磊, 廖蓥飞, 严光, 伍一宁, 邹红菲. 松嫩平原异质生境对土壤线虫群落特征的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23295-.
[12]	段晓敏, 李佳佳, 李靖宇, 李艳楠, 袁存霞, 王英娜, 刘建利. 腾格里沙漠东南缘藓结皮植物-土壤连续体不同粒径土壤微生物群落多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23131-.
[13]	牛永杰, 马全会, 朱玉, 刘海荣, 吕佳乐, 邹元春, 姜明. 氮沉降对草地昆虫多样性影响的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23130-.
[14]	罗正明, 刘晋仙, 张变华, 周妍英, 郝爱华, 杨凯, 柴宝峰. 不同退化阶段亚高山草甸土壤原生生物群落多样性特征及驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23136-.
[15]	张雅丽, 张丙昌, 赵康, 李凯凯, 刘燕晋. 毛乌素沙地不同类型生物结皮细菌群落差异及其驱动因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23027-.