莱州湾大型砂壳纤毛虫群落季节变化

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13257

生物多样性 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 649-657.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13257

所属专题：海洋生物多样性

莱州湾大型砂壳纤毛虫群落季节变化

陈雪^1,³, 张武昌^1,^*(), 吴强², 栾青杉², 肖天¹

1 中国科学院海洋研究所海洋生态与环境重点实验室, 山东青岛 266071
2 中国水产科学院黄海水产研究所海洋可捕资源评估与生态系统实验室, 山东青岛 266071
3 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2013-12-11 接受日期:2014-04-17 出版日期:2014-09-20 发布日期:2014-10-09
通讯作者: 张武昌
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2011CB409804)和国家自然科学基金(U1406403)

Seasonal change of the community of large-sized tintinnids (Ciliophora, Tintinnida) in Laizhou Bay

Xue Chen^1,³, Wuchang Zhang^1,^*(), Qiang Wu², Qingshan Luan², Tian Xiao¹

1 Key Laboratory of Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong 266071
2 Laboratory of Stock Assessment and Ecosystem, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong 266071
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received:2013-12-11 Accepted:2014-04-17 Online:2014-09-20 Published:2014-10-09
Contact: Zhang Wuchang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为揭示莱州湾砂壳纤毛虫群落季节变化规律, 在莱州湾设置8个站位, 于2011年5-11月及2012年3-4月进行了9个航次的调查, 用浅海III型浮游生物网由底至表垂直拖网采集砂壳纤毛虫。结果表明, 莱州湾3-11月砂壳纤毛虫物种丰富度的变化范围为5-19, 周年变化呈现一峰两谷的趋势。丰度的范围为0-318 ind./L, 丰度较大(> 50 ind./L)的种类有运动类铃虫(Codonellopsis mobilis)和清兰拟铃虫(Tintinnopsis chinglanensis)。各月平均丰度随时间的变化趋势为双峰型, 最大值出现在7月(63 ind./L), 次峰值出现在5月(48 ind./L), 最小值出现在3月(2 ind./L)。黏着壳种类在3-11月均有出现, 透明壳种类仅在温度较高(> 15°C)的6-9月出现。各月的优势种数目为1种(5月)到8种(8月), 其中运动类铃虫在所有月中都是优势种, 对砂壳纤毛虫丰度周年的变化规律产生较大影响。使用各月所有种类的平均丰度对各月砂壳纤毛虫群落进行聚类分析, 得到两个群落(相似度30%): 群落I(7-9月)和群落II(3-6月、10-11月), 说明砂壳纤毛虫群落发生了明显的季节变化。砂壳纤毛虫的物种丰富度、丰度与环境因子(温度、盐度)均没有明显的相关性。

关键词: 砂壳纤毛虫, 群落, 周年变化, 莱州湾

Abstract

The abundance and seasonal change of large-sized tintinnids were studied in Laizhou Bay. Large-sized tintinnids were collected by vertical towing using a shallow sea type III plankton net (open area 0.1 m², mesh size 76 μm) during 9 cruises between May and November of 2011 and from March to April, 2012. The samples were fixed in formalin solution to a final concentration of 5% and counted using an inverted microscope in the laboratory. We sampled 8 stations to avoid fluctuations over a short time period. The purpose of this study was to characterize seasonal change of the large-sized tintinnid community. Maximum tintinnid species richness was 19 in August and minimum was 5 in May. Tintinnid abundance ranged from 0 ind./L to 318 ind./L. Average abundance at all stations was highest (63 ind./L) in July and lowest (2 ind./L) in March, and there was a secondary peak of 48 ind./L in May. The abundance of Codonellopsis mobilis and Tintinnopsis chinglanensis were more than 50 ind./L. Agglutinated species occurred from March to November, while the hyaline species only occurred from June to September when the temperature was > 15°C. Codonellopsis mobilis occurred from March to November. The number of dominant species ranged from 1 in May, to 8 in August. Codonellopsis mobilis was a dominant species during all time periods and this one species significantly influenced the pattern of total ciliate abundance. Using the average abundance data of 8 stations, two distinct cluster groups were observed (30% similarity): cluster I (July to September) and cluster II (March to June, October to November). The cluster results showed that there was a seasonal change of the large-sized tintinnid community. Average abundance and species richness were not significantly correlated with temperature and salinity.

Key words: Tintinnid, community, seasonal change, Laizhou Bay

陈雪, 张武昌, 吴强, 栾青杉, 肖天 (2014) 莱州湾大型砂壳纤毛虫群落季节变化. 生物多样性, 22, 649-657. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13257.

Xue Chen,Wuchang Zhang,Qiang Wu,Qingshan Luan,Tian Xiao (2014) Seasonal change of the community of large-sized tintinnids (Ciliophora, Tintinnida) in Laizhou Bay. Biodiversity Science, 22, 649-657. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13257.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13257

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2014/V22/I5/649

图/表 10

参考文献 33

[1]	.Abboud-Abi Saab M (1989) Distribution and ecology of tintinnids in the plankton of Lebanese coastal waters (eastern Mediterranean). Journal of Plankton Research, 11, 203-222.
[2]	.Abboud-Abi Saab M (2002) Annual cycle of the micro- zooplankton communities in the waters surrounding the Palm Island Nature Reserve (north Lebanon), with special attention to tintinnids. Mediterranean Marine Science, 3, 55-76.
[3]	.Azam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Gray JS, Meyer-Reil LA, Thingstad F (1983) The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 10, 257-263.
[4]	.Bojanić N (2001) Seasonal distribution of the ciliated protozoa in Kastela Bay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 81, 383-390.
[5]	.Bojanić N, Šolić M, Krstulović N, Šestanović S, Marasović I, Ninčević Ž (2005) Temporal variability in abundance and biomass of ciliates and copepods in the eutrophicated part of Kaštela Bay (Middle Adriatic Sea). Helgoland Marine Research, 59, 107-120.
[6]	.Dolan JR (1991) Guilds of ciliate microzooplankton in the Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 33, 137-152.
[7]	.Dolan JR, Gallegos CL (2001) Estuarine diversity of tintinnids (planktonic ciliates). Journal of Plankton Research, 23, 1009-1027.
[8]	.Dolan JR, Montagnes DJ, Agatha S, Coats DW, Stoecker DK (2013) The Biology and Ecology of Tintinnid Ciliates: Models for Marine Plankton. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
[9]	.Elliott DT, Kaufmann RS (2007) Spatial and temporal variability of mesozooplankton and tintinnid ciliates in a seasonally hypersaline estuary. Estuaries and Coasts, 30, 418-430.
[10]	.Gold K, Morales EA (1975) Seasonal changes in lorica sizes and the species of Tintinnida in the New York Bight. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 22, 520-528.
[11]	.Graziano C (1989) On the ecology of tintinnids (Ciliophora: Oligotrichida) in the North Irish Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 29, 233-245.
[12]	.Kamiyama T, Tsujino M (1996) Seasonal variation in the species composition of tintinnid ciliates in Hiroshima Bay, the Seto Inland Sea of Japan. Journal of Plankton Research, 18, 2313-2327.
[13]	.Kofoid CA, Campbell AS (1929) A Conspectus of the Marine and Fresh-water Ciliata Belonging to the Suborder Tintinnoinea: with Descriptions of New Species Principally from the Agassiz Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific 1904-1905. University of California, Publications in Zoology, 34, 1-403.
[14]	.Kofoid CA, Campbell AS (1939) The Ciliata: the Tintinnoinea. Reports on the Scientific Results of the Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific 1904-1905. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 84, 1473.
[15]	.Laval-Peuto M, Heinbokel JF, Anderson OR, Rassoulzadegan F, Sherr BF (1986) Role of micro- and nanozooplankton in marine food webs. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 7, 387-395.
[16]	.Leakey R, Burkill PH, Sleigh M (1993) Planktonic ciliates in Southampton Water: quantitative taxonomic studies. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United King- dom, 73, 579-594.
[17]	.Modigh M, Castaldo S (2002) Variability and persistence in tintinnid assemblages at a Mediterranean coastal site. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 28, 299-311.
[18]	.Montagnes D, Lynn D, Roff J, Taylor W (1988) The annual cycle of heterotrophic planktonic ciliates in the waters surrounding the Isles of Shoals, Gulf of Maine: an assessment of their trophic role. Marine Biology, 99, 21-30.
[19]	.Pielou EC (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, 131-144.
[20]	.Pierce RW (1992) Ecology of planktonic ciliates in marine food webs. Reviews in Aquatic Sciences, 6, 139-181.
[21]	.Pierce RW, Turner JT (1994) Plankton studies in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts, USA. IV. Tintinnids, 1987 to 1988. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 112, 235-240.
[22]	.Sanders RW (1987) Tintinnids and other microzooplankton: seasonal distributions and relationships to resources and Hydrography in a Maine estuary. Journal of Plankton Research, 9, 65-77.
[23]	.Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
[24]	.Sitran R, Bergamasco A, Decembrini F, Guglielmo L (2007) Temporal succession of tintinnids in the northern Ionian Sea, central Mediterranean. Journal of Plankton Research, 29, 495-508.
[25]	.Sun J (孙军), Liu DY (刘东艳) (2003) The application of diversity indices in marine phytoplankton studies. Acta Oceanologica Sinica(海洋学报), 26, 62-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	.Urrutxurtu I, Orive E, de la Sota A (2003) Seasonal dynamics of ciliated protozoa and their potential food in an eutrophic estuary (Bay of Biscay). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 57, 1169-1182.
[27]	.Vaqué D, Blough H, Duarte C (1997) Dynamics of ciliate abundance, biomass and community composition in an oligotrophic coastal environment (NW Mediterranean). Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 12, 71-83.
[28]	.Verity PG (1987) Abundance, community composition, size distribution, and production rates of tintinnids in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 24, 671-690.
[29]	.Witek M (1998) Annual changes of abundance and biomass of planktonic ciliates in the Gdańsk Basin, southern Baltic. International Review of Hydrobiology, 83, 163-182.
[30]	.Xu ZL (徐兆礼), Chen YQ (陈亚瞿) (1989) Aggregated intensity of dominant species of zooplankton in autumn in the East China Sea and Yellow Sea. Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 4, 13-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	.Yu Y (于莹), Zhang WC (张武昌), Zhao N (赵楠), Sun XX (孙晓霞), Zhang CX (张翠霞), Feng MP (丰美萍), Xiao T (肖天) (2011) Annual variations in the abundance and biomass of planktonic ciliate in the Jiaozhou Bay. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica(海洋与湖沼), 42, 690-701. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	.Zhang WC (张武昌), Wang R (王荣) (2000) Microzooplank- ton and their grazing pressure on phytoplankton in Bohai Sea. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica(海洋与湖沼), 31, 252-258. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	.Zhang WC (张武昌), Feng MP (丰美萍), Yu Y (于莹), Zhang CX (张翠霞), Xiao T (肖天) (2012) An Illustrated Guide to Contemporary Tintinnids in the World (砂壳纤毛虫图谱). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)

中文种名 Chinese name	拉丁文种名 Latin name	A_max	M_max
透明壳种类 Hyaline species
尖底类瓮虫	Amphorellopsis acuta	2.81	8
卢氏真铃虫	Eutintinnus lusus-undae	2.53	7
巴拿马网纹虫	Favella panamensis	4.21	6
黏着壳种类 Agglutinated species
鲁西塔尼亚类铃虫	Codonellopsis lusitanica	1.04	8
运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	316.72	5
诺氏薄铃虫	Leprotintinnus nordqvisti	0.42	7
简单薄铃虫	L. simplex	7.67	7
白领细壳虫	Stenosemella nivalis	16.93	7
巴西拟铃虫	Tintinnopsis brasiliensis	1.04	3
布氏拟铃虫	T. butschlii	1.18	7
清兰拟铃虫	T. chinglanensis	65.85	7
有角拟铃虫	T. corniger	3.87	7
指状拟铃虫	T. digita	9.44	8
直颈拟铃虫	T. directa	0.53	7
半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	3.85	11
日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	14.21	4
卡拉直克拟铃虫	T. karajacensis	0.20	3
罗氏拟铃虫	T. lohmanni	6.15	7
梅氏拟铃虫	T. mayeri	0.11	4
根状拟铃虫	T. radix	29.14	7
圆锥拟铃虫	T. rapa	0.59	3
斯氏拟铃虫	T. schotti	12.43	9
妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	13.38	8
未定种1	Tintinnopsis sp.1	4.84	5
未定种2	Tintinnopsis sp.2	0.39	6
未定种3	Tintinnopsis sp.3	0.80	8

中文种名 Chinese name	拉丁文种名 Latin name	A_max	M_max
透明壳种类 Hyaline species
尖底类瓮虫	Amphorellopsis acuta	2.81	8
卢氏真铃虫	Eutintinnus lusus-undae	2.53	7
巴拿马网纹虫	Favella panamensis	4.21	6
黏着壳种类 Agglutinated species
鲁西塔尼亚类铃虫	Codonellopsis lusitanica	1.04	8
运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	316.72	5
诺氏薄铃虫	Leprotintinnus nordqvisti	0.42	7
简单薄铃虫	L. simplex	7.67	7
白领细壳虫	Stenosemella nivalis	16.93	7
巴西拟铃虫	Tintinnopsis brasiliensis	1.04	3
布氏拟铃虫	T. butschlii	1.18	7
清兰拟铃虫	T. chinglanensis	65.85	7
有角拟铃虫	T. corniger	3.87	7
指状拟铃虫	T. digita	9.44	8
直颈拟铃虫	T. directa	0.53	7
半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	3.85	11
日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	14.21	4
卡拉直克拟铃虫	T. karajacensis	0.20	3
罗氏拟铃虫	T. lohmanni	6.15	7
梅氏拟铃虫	T. mayeri	0.11	4
根状拟铃虫	T. radix	29.14	7
圆锥拟铃虫	T. rapa	0.59	3
斯氏拟铃虫	T. schotti	12.43	9
妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	13.38	8
未定种1	Tintinnopsis sp.1	4.84	5
未定种2	Tintinnopsis sp.2	0.39	6
未定种3	Tintinnopsis sp.3	0.80	8

	优势种 Dominant species		优势度 Dominance		优势种 Dominant species		优势度 Dominance
3月	日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.293	8月	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.179
	半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.100		清兰拟铃虫	T. chinglanensis	0.129
	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.065		妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	0.095
	指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.065		指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.077
	巴西拟铃虫	T. brasiliensis	0.065		运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.045
4月	日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.637		日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.044
	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.288		罗氏拟铃虫	T. lohmanni	0.040
5月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.979		根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.031
				9月	斯氏拟铃虫	T. schotti	0.220
6月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.581		有角拟铃虫	T. corniger	0.042
	巴拿马网纹虫	F. panamensis	0.189		半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.033
		Tintinnopsis sp.1	0.049		指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.032
7月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.305		根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.024
	根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.157	10月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.496
	清兰拟铃虫	T.chinglanensis	0.086		白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.349
	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.075	11月	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.445
	妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	0.067		半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.267
	简单薄铃虫	L. simplex	0.033		运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.215
					日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.030

	优势种 Dominant species		优势度 Dominance		优势种 Dominant species		优势度 Dominance
3月	日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.293	8月	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.179
	半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.100		清兰拟铃虫	T. chinglanensis	0.129
	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.065		妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	0.095
	指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.065		指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.077
	巴西拟铃虫	T. brasiliensis	0.065		运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.045
4月	日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.637		日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.044
	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.288		罗氏拟铃虫	T. lohmanni	0.040
5月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.979		根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.031
				9月	斯氏拟铃虫	T. schotti	0.220
6月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.581		有角拟铃虫	T. corniger	0.042
	巴拿马网纹虫	F. panamensis	0.189		半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.033
		Tintinnopsis sp.1	0.049		指状拟铃虫	T. digita	0.032
7月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.305		根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.024
	根状拟铃虫	T. radix	0.157	10月	运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.496
	清兰拟铃虫	T.chinglanensis	0.086		白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.349
	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.075	11月	白领细壳虫	S. nivalis	0.445
	妥肯丁拟铃虫	T. tocantinensis	0.067		半旋拟铃虫	T. hemispiralis	0.267
	简单薄铃虫	L. simplex	0.033		运动类铃虫	C. mobilis	0.215
					日本拟铃虫	T. japonica	0.030

	3月 March	4月 April	5月 May	6月 June	7月 July	8月 August	9月 September	10月 October	11月 November
种丰富度 Species richness	10	7	5	11	18	19	12	6	10
均匀度指数 Evenness index (J)	0.78±0.15	0.62±0.18	0.40±0.30	0.59±0.19	0.57±0.13	0.72±0.08	0.76±0.26	0.55±0.18	0.69±0.11
多样性指数 Diversity index (H')	1.71±0.60	1.00±0.23	0.42±0.29	1.33±0.34	2.06±0.50	2.38±0.32	1.45±0.75	1.04±0.46	1.71±0.36

莱州湾大型砂壳纤毛虫群落季节变化

Seasonal change of the community of large-sized tintinnids (Ciliophora, Tintinnida) in Laizhou Bay

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁聪, 刘衎, 王小东, 黎树, 吴波, 向朋, 宋昭彬. 四川诺水河珍稀水生动物国家级自然保护区鱼类资源现状[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 938-949.
[2]	陈旭, 王国严, 彭培好, 李景吉, 石松林, 张廷斌. 四川攀西地区云南松群落物种多样性和谱系多样性对紫茎泽兰入侵的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 865-874.
[3]	康佳鹏, 韩路, 冯春晖, 王海珍. 塔里木荒漠河岸林不同生境群落物种多度分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 875-886.
[4]	易浪, 董亚坤, 苗白鸽, 彭艳琼. 云南高黎贡山地区蝴蝶群落多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 950-959.
[5]	邹怡. 样本量不一致时的β多样性计算[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 790-797.
[6]	刘晋仙, 柴宝峰, 罗正明. 复合污染尾矿废水中真菌群落多样性及其驱动机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 373-384.
[7]	王楠, 黄菁华, 霍娜, 杨盼盼, 张欣玥, 赵世伟. 宁南山区不同植被恢复方式下土壤线虫群落特征:形态学鉴定与高通量测序法比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(11): 1513-1529.
[8]	吴二焕, 李东海, 杨小波, 左永令, 李龙, 张培春, 陈琳, 田路嘉, 李晨笛. 海南苏铁种群结构与森林群落郁闭度的关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(11): 1461-1469.
[9]	董雷, 王静, 刘永刚, 赵志平, 米湘成, 郭柯. 太行山北段地区荆条灌丛和三裂绣线菊灌丛群落谱系结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 21-31.
[10]	余宏昌, 毕宝帅, 唐文乔, 张亚, 郭弘艺. 上海苏州河治理中鱼类多样性及群落结构变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 32-42.
[11]	李世雄, 王彦龙, 王玉琴, 尹亚丽. 土壤细菌群落特征对高寒草甸退化的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 53-64.
[12]	向颖, 刘素群, 黄兴龙, 刘志霄, 张佑祥, 马方舟. 湖南高望界国家级自然保护区及其周边蝶类多样性与影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(8): 940-949.
[13]	洪芳, 向颖, 陈朝阳, 孙亮先, 罗春首, 蒋国芳. 龙栖山自然保护区蝴蝶群落多样性及区系组成[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(8): 1003-1007.
[14]	邓敏, 廖明玮, 王晨彬, 廖承清, 康祖杰, 马方舟, 黄国华. 人为干扰对壶瓶山国家级自然保护区蝴蝶物种多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(8): 931-939.
[15]	尚素琴, 吴兴波, 王召龙, 彭鹤年, 周惠丽, 张红勇, 白映禄. 兴隆山国家级自然保护区不同生境的蝴蝶群落结构与种-多度分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(8): 983-992.