紫色土区不同秸秆还田量对土壤线虫群落的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13217

生物多样性 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 392-400. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13217

所属专题：土壤生物与土壤健康

紫色土区不同秸秆还田量对土壤线虫群落的影响

华萃¹, 吴鹏飞^1,,A;^*(), 何先进¹, 朱波²

1.西南民族大学生命科学与技术学院, 成都 610041
2 .中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 山地环境演变与调控重点实验室, 成都 610041

收稿日期:2013-10-09 接受日期:2014-03-18 出版日期:2014-05-20 发布日期:2014-06-04
通讯作者: 吴鹏飞
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41371270、40801092)、四川省青年基金(2012JQ0030)、西南民族大学研究生创新项目(CX2013SZ49)和中央高校优秀团队及重大孵化项目(2014NZYTD01)

Effects of different amounts of straw returning treatments on soil nematode community in purple soil

Cui Hua¹, Pengfei Wu^1,^*(), Xianjin He¹, Bo Zhu²

1. College of Life Science and Technology, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041
2. Key Laboratory of Environmental Evolution and Regulation, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041

Received:2013-10-09 Accepted:2014-03-18 Online:2014-05-20 Published:2014-06-04
Contact: Wu Pengfei

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了研究不同秸秆还田量对紫色土区土壤线虫群落的影响, 作者于2011年5月和9月对川中丘陵区的100% (RMW1)、50%(RMW2)、30%(RMW3)和空白对照(CK)4种秸秆还田量的农田土壤线虫进行了调查。结果发现, 随着秸秆还田量的下降, 土壤线虫的群落结构有一定变化。总体上, 群落密度、食真菌类群和捕食-杂食类群的密度呈波动增加; 食细菌类群的密度持续增加; 植物寄生类群密度、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H')、植物寄生成熟指数(PPI)和瓦斯乐斯卡指数(WI)呈先增加后下降的变化趋势, 且多样性指数在秸秆还田量为30-50%之间最高; 类群数、自由生活成熟指数(MI)、线虫通路比值(CR)则先下降后增加; 所有变化均不显著(P > 0.05)。土壤速效钾含量随秸秆还田量的增加显著提高(P < 0.05), 且与线虫群落多样性指数呈显著负相关(P < 0.05)。研究结果表明, 在紫色土区秸秆还田主要是通过改变土壤钾含量对土壤线虫群落产生影响, 且秸秆还田量在30-50%之间时有利于维持线虫群落多样性。

关键词: 秸秆还田量, 土壤线虫, 多样性, 群落结构, 营养类群

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of 4 years of straw returning (2007-2011) on the nematode communities of the purple soil area in the hilly areas of central Sichuan basin, China, using the four treatments of 100, 50, 30, and 0% of straw returned to cropland. The Baermann method was used to extract nematodes from soil samples (0-15 cm). A total of 2,380 individuals, belonging to 2 classes, 8 orders, 24 families, and 39 genera, were extracted. The dominant genera included Tylencholaimus and Prionchulus, comprising 31% of total soil nematode individuals. Our results showed that soil nematode communities differed among the four treatments. Densities of the total nematode community, and fungivores and predators-omnivores specifically exhibited greater fluctuations with reducing straw return levels, while densities of bacterivores increased with reducing straw levels. Plant-parasite density, diversity index(H'), plant-parasite index (PPI) and Wasilewska index (WI) first increased and then decreased with reduction of straw return, while genera number, free-living nematode maturity index (MI) and channel ratio (CR) presented the opposite trend. Nematode diversity index (H') was highest at 30-50% straw return levels. But there were no significant differences among treatments for all of the indexes. The content of soil available potassium, which significantly increased at the lower levels of straw return, was significantly correlated with diversity indices of nematode communities. Our results suggested that straw return management changes the nematode community through its action on the content of soil available potassium, and that level of 30-50% of straw returning were optimal in the hilly areas of central Sichuan basin in terms of maximizing nematode diversity.

Key words: amounts of straw returning, soil nematode, diversity, community structure, trophic groups

华萃, 吴鹏飞, 何先进, 朱波 (2014) 紫色土区不同秸秆还田量对土壤线虫群落的影响. 生物多样性, 22, 392-400. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13217.

Cui Hua, Pengfei Wu, Xianjin He, Bo Zhu (2014) Effects of different amounts of straw returning treatments on soil nematode community in purple soil. Biodiversity Science, 22, 392-400. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13217.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13217

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2014/V22/I3/392

图/表 8

参考文献 27

[1]	Bai HP (白和平), Hu XQ (胡喜巧), Zhu JT (朱俊涛), Pan YX (潘远祥), Liang YP (梁运攀), Zhang XJ (张潇军), Jiang AF (蒋爱凤) (2011) Effects of corn straw returning to field on wheat field soil nutrient. Science & Technology Information(科技信息), (11), 37-38. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	Bongers T (1990) The maturity index: an ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia, 83, 14-19.
[3]	Bongers T, Bongers M (1998) Functional diversity of nematodes. Applied Soil Ecology, 10, 239-251.
[4]	Fuentes M, Govaerts B, De León F, Hidalgo C, Dendooven L, Sayre KD, Etchevers J (2009) Fourteen years of applying zero and conventional tillage, crop rotation and residue management systems and its effect on physical and chemical soil quality. European Journal of Agronomy, 30, 228-237.
[5]	Gunapala N, Venette RC, Ferris H, Scow KM (1998) Effects of soil management history on the rate of organic matter decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30, 1917-1927.
[6]	Lenz R, Eisenbeis G (2000) Short-term effects of different tillage in a sustainable farming system on nematode community structure. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 31, 237-244.
[7]	Li ZM (李仲明) (2003) Purple Soil in China (中国紫色土). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[8]	Liang WJ (梁文举), Zhang WM (张万民), Li WG (李维光), Duan YX (段玉玺) (2001) Effect of chemical fertilizer on nematode community composition and diversity in the black soil region. Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 9, 237-240. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Lin YH (林英华), Zhang FD (张夫道), Yang XY (杨学云), Bao DJ (宝德俊), Shi XJ (石孝均), Wang SJ (王胜佳), Wang BR (王伯仁) (2004) Study on the relationship between agricultural soil fauna and soil physicochemical properties. Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学), 37, 871-877. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	Lu RK (鲁如坤) (2000) Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis Method (土壤农业化学分析方法). China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[11]	Ma KP (马克平), Liu YM (刘玉明) (1994) Measurement of biotic community diversity. I. α diversity (Part 2). Chinese Biodiversity(生物多样性), 2, 231-239. (in Chinese)
[12]	McBride RG, Mikkelsen RL, Barker KR (2000) The role of low molecular weight organic acids from decomposing rye in inhibiting root-knot nematode populations in soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 15, 243-251.
[13]	Neher DA (1999) Soil community composition and ecosystem processes: comparing agricultural ecosystems with natural ecosystems. Agroforestry Systems, 45, 159-185.
[14]	Tong FC (佟富春), Xiao YH (肖以华), Wang QL (王庆礼) (2009) Effects of succession process of secondary forestry on characteristics of soil nematode communities in Changbai Mountain. Journal of South China Agricultural University(华南农业大学学报), 30, 63-68. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	Wang KH, McSorley R, Gallaher RN (2003) Effect of Crotalaria juncea amendment on nematode communities in soil with different agricultural histories. Journal of Nematology, 35, 294-301.
[16]	Wang KH, McSorley R, Marshall AJ, Gallaher RN (2004) Nematode community changes associated with decomposition of Crotalaria juncea amendment in litterbags. Applied Soil Ecology, 27, 31-45.
[17]	Wasilewska L (1994) The effect of age of meadows on succession and diversity in soil nematode communities. Pedobiologia, 38, 1-11.
[18]	Wu JH, Fu CZ, Chen SS, Chen JK (2002) Soil faunal response to land use: effect of estuarine tideland reclamation on nematode communities. Applied Soil Ecology, 21, 131-147.
[19]	Wu TY (武天云), Schoenau JJ, Li FM (李凤民), Qian PY (钱佩源), Zhang SQ (张树清), Malhi SS, Wang F (王方) (2004) Concepts and relative analytical techniques of soil organic matter. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 15, 717-722. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Yeates GW, Bongers T, De Goede R, Freckman DW, Georgieva SS (1993) Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera—an outline for soil ecologists. Journal of Nematology, 25, 315-331.
[21]	Yin WY (尹文英) (1998)Pictorial Keys to Soil Animal of China (中国土壤动物检索图鉴). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[22]	Yin XQ, Song B, Dong WH, Xin WD, Wang YQ (2010) A review on the eco-geography of soil fauna in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20, 333-346.
[23]	Zhang XK, Li Q, Zhu AN, Liang WJ, Zhang JB, Steinberger Y (2012) Effects of tillage and residue management on soil nematode communities in North China. Ecological Indicators, 13, 75-81.
[24]	Zhao YX (赵映霞), Liu QZ (刘奇志), Cao ZP (曹志平), Wu WL (吴文良), Xue ZT (薛泽涛), Pan D (潘登) (2003) Effect of fertilization on population dynamics of plant- parasite nematode. Plant Protection(植物保护), 29(6), 19-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	Zhu B (朱波), Chen S (陈实), You X (游祥), Peng K (彭奎), Zhang XW (张先婉) (2002) Soil fertility restoration on degraded upland of purple soil. Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报), 39, 743-749. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	Zhu B (朱波), Zhou MH (周明华), Kuang FH (况福虹), Wang T (汪涛) (2013) Measurement and simulation of nitrogen leaching loss in hillslope cropland of purple soil. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture(中国生态农业学报), 21, 102-109. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	Zhu XY (朱新玉), Dong ZX (董志新), Kuang FH (况福虹), Zhu B (朱波) (2013) Effects of fertilization regimes on soil faunal communities in cropland of purple soil, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 33, 464-474. (in Chinese with English abstract)

项目 Item	有机质 Soil organic material (g/kg)	全氮 Total N (g/kg)	有效磷 Available P (mg/kg)	速效钾 Available K (mg/kg)	pH
RMW1	14.52±0.43^a	1.01±0.04^a	12.25±0.25^a	144.50±8.86^a	8.31±0.09^a
RMW2	13.07±0.85^a	0.87±0.03^b	10.75±0.63^a	126.75±2.10^a	8.42±0.06^a
RMW3	12.68±0.20^a	0.89±0.00^b	10.00±0.41^a	104.75±5.88^ab	8.26±0.06^a
CK	12.10±0.73^a	0.87±0.04^b	11.00±0.71^a	106.50±1.19^b	8.34±0.05^a
F	2.87	4.02	3.11	11.89	1.10
P	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	<0.01	>0.05

项目 Item	有机质 Soil organic material (g/kg)	全氮 Total N (g/kg)	有效磷 Available P (mg/kg)	速效钾 Available K (mg/kg)	pH
RMW1	14.52±0.43^a	1.01±0.04^a	12.25±0.25^a	144.50±8.86^a	8.31±0.09^a
RMW2	13.07±0.85^a	0.87±0.03^b	10.75±0.63^a	126.75±2.10^a	8.42±0.06^a
RMW3	12.68±0.20^a	0.89±0.00^b	10.00±0.41^a	104.75±5.88^ab	8.26±0.06^a
CK	12.10±0.73^a	0.87±0.04^b	11.00±0.71^a	106.50±1.19^b	8.34±0.05^a
F	2.87	4.02	3.11	11.89	1.10
P	>0.05	<0.05	>0.05	<0.01	>0.05

类群 Group	RMW1	RMW2	RMW3	CK	合计 Total	营养类群 Trophic group
矛线目 Dorylaimida
垫咽属 Tylencholaimus	95	141	92	147	475	Fu₄
大矛属 Enchodelus	16	15	34	37	102	PO₄
剑属 Xiphinema	25	40	26	27	118	Pl₄
短体长针属 Longidorella	18	18	16	20	72	Pl₄
长针属 Longidorus	0	12	0	5	17	Pl₄
矛线属 Dorylaimus	30	39	22	21	112	PO₄
中矛线属 Mesodorylaimus	0	0	1	4	5	PO₄
无咽属 Alaimus	1	24	19	2	46	Ba₄
穿咽属 Nygolaimus	5	0	0	14	19	PO₅
小计 Total	190	289	210	277	966
单齿目 Mononchida
锯齿属 Prionchulus	87	54	20	104	265	PO₄
锉齿属 Mylonchulus	30	58	33	67	188	PO₄
基齿属 Iotonchus	3	6	8	15	32	PO₄
单齿属 Mononchus	0	0	0	1	1	PO₄
小计 Total	120	118	61	187	486
窄咽目 Araeolaimida
柱咽属 Cylindrolaimus	20	17	18	19	74	Ba₃
管咽属 Aulolaimus	0	0	0	25	25	Ba₃
巴氏属 Bastiania	10	22	21	32	85	Ba₃
绕线属 Plectus	15	0	0	4	19	Ba₂
杆咽属 Rhabdolaimus	0	2	4	1	7	Ba₃
小计 Total	45	41	43	81	210
嘴刺目 Enoplida
托布利属 Tobrilus	0	74	29	13	116	PO₃
三孔属 Tripyla	0	0	0	1	1	PO₃
小计 Total	0	74	29	14	117
色矛目 Chromadorida
异色矛属 Achromadora	3	0	7	3	13	PO₃
色矛属 Chromadorita	0	0	0	2	2	PO₃
小计 Total	3	0	7	5	15
单宫目 Monhysterida
单宫属 Monhystera	0	0	0	11	11	Ba₁
小计 Total	0	0	0	11	11
小杆目 Rhabditida
原杆属 Protorhabditis	17	67	79	62	225	Ba₁
明杆属 Rhabditophanes	18	9	6	14	47	Ba₁
小杆属 Rhabditis	0	0	1	0	1	Ba₁
齿咽属 Odontopharynx	21	13	0	31	65	Ba₁
后双胃属 Metadiplogaster	0	0	0	4	4	Ba₁
伪杆咽属 Rhabdontolaimus	0	0	0	3	3	Ba₁
头叶属 Cephalobus	9	3	19	2	33	Ba₂
鹿角唇属 Cervidellus	0	4	5	0	9	Ba₂
伪双胃属 Pseudodiplogasteroide	0	1	1	4	6	Ba₁
盆咽属 Panagrolaimus	2	0	0	1	3	Ba₁
小计 Total	67	97	111	121	396
垫刃目 Tylenchida
短体属 Pratylenchus	23	28	47	7	105	Pl₃
根潜属 Hirschmanniella	2	0	0	0	2	Pl₃
针属 Paratylenchus	10	10	31	7	58	Pl₂
伪垫刃属 Nothotylenchus	0	0	0	9	9	Fu₂
刺属 Belonolaimus	0	2	0	2	4	Pl₃
柄端球属 Paurodontus	0	0	0	1	1	Fu₂
小计 Total	35	40	78	26	179
总个体数 Total individuals	460	659	539	722	2,380
总类群数 Total group number	22	23	23	36	39

类群 Group	RMW1	RMW2	RMW3	CK	合计 Total	营养类群 Trophic group
矛线目 Dorylaimida
垫咽属 Tylencholaimus	95	141	92	147	475	Fu₄
大矛属 Enchodelus	16	15	34	37	102	PO₄
剑属 Xiphinema	25	40	26	27	118	Pl₄
短体长针属 Longidorella	18	18	16	20	72	Pl₄
长针属 Longidorus	0	12	0	5	17	Pl₄
矛线属 Dorylaimus	30	39	22	21	112	PO₄
中矛线属 Mesodorylaimus	0	0	1	4	5	PO₄
无咽属 Alaimus	1	24	19	2	46	Ba₄
穿咽属 Nygolaimus	5	0	0	14	19	PO₅
小计 Total	190	289	210	277	966
单齿目 Mononchida
锯齿属 Prionchulus	87	54	20	104	265	PO₄
锉齿属 Mylonchulus	30	58	33	67	188	PO₄
基齿属 Iotonchus	3	6	8	15	32	PO₄
单齿属 Mononchus	0	0	0	1	1	PO₄
小计 Total	120	118	61	187	486
窄咽目 Araeolaimida
柱咽属 Cylindrolaimus	20	17	18	19	74	Ba₃
管咽属 Aulolaimus	0	0	0	25	25	Ba₃
巴氏属 Bastiania	10	22	21	32	85	Ba₃
绕线属 Plectus	15	0	0	4	19	Ba₂
杆咽属 Rhabdolaimus	0	2	4	1	7	Ba₃
小计 Total	45	41	43	81	210
嘴刺目 Enoplida
托布利属 Tobrilus	0	74	29	13	116	PO₃
三孔属 Tripyla	0	0	0	1	1	PO₃
小计 Total	0	74	29	14	117
色矛目 Chromadorida
异色矛属 Achromadora	3	0	7	3	13	PO₃
色矛属 Chromadorita	0	0	0	2	2	PO₃
小计 Total	3	0	7	5	15
单宫目 Monhysterida
单宫属 Monhystera	0	0	0	11	11	Ba₁
小计 Total	0	0	0	11	11
小杆目 Rhabditida
原杆属 Protorhabditis	17	67	79	62	225	Ba₁
明杆属 Rhabditophanes	18	9	6	14	47	Ba₁
小杆属 Rhabditis	0	0	1	0	1	Ba₁
齿咽属 Odontopharynx	21	13	0	31	65	Ba₁
后双胃属 Metadiplogaster	0	0	0	4	4	Ba₁
伪杆咽属 Rhabdontolaimus	0	0	0	3	3	Ba₁
头叶属 Cephalobus	9	3	19	2	33	Ba₂
鹿角唇属 Cervidellus	0	4	5	0	9	Ba₂
伪双胃属 Pseudodiplogasteroide	0	1	1	4	6	Ba₁
盆咽属 Panagrolaimus	2	0	0	1	3	Ba₁
小计 Total	67	97	111	121	396
垫刃目 Tylenchida
短体属 Pratylenchus	23	28	47	7	105	Pl₃
根潜属 Hirschmanniella	2	0	0	0	2	Pl₃
针属 Paratylenchus	10	10	31	7	58	Pl₂
伪垫刃属 Nothotylenchus	0	0	0	9	9	Fu₂
刺属 Belonolaimus	0	2	0	2	4	Pl₃
柄端球属 Paurodontus	0	0	0	1	1	Fu₂
小计 Total	35	40	78	26	179
总个体数 Total individuals	460	659	539	722	2,380
总类群数 Total group number	22	23	23	36	39

项目 Item	线虫群落 Community		食细菌类群Bacterivores		食真菌类群Fungivores		植物寄生类群 Plant-parasites		捕食-杂食类群Predators-Omnivores
项目 Item	F	P	F	P	F	P	F	P	F	P
月份 Month	1.86	0.20	0.67	0.43	11.39	0.01	0.25	0.63	0.01	0.97
处理 Treatment	0.56	0.65	0.55	0.66	0.16	0.92	1.63	0.24	0.70	0.57
月份×处理 Month×Treatment	0.43	0.74	0.64	0.60	0.67	0.59	0.20	0.90	0.32	0.81

紫色土区不同秸秆还田量对土壤线虫群落的影响

Effects of different amounts of straw returning treatments on soil nematode community in purple soil

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

项目 Item	类群数 Group number		Shannon-Wiener多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener index (H')			自由生活成熟指数 Free-living nematode maturity index (MI)			植物寄生成熟指数 Plant-parasite Index (PPI)			线虫通路比值 Channel ratio (CR)			瓦斯乐斯卡指数 Wasilewska index (WI)
项目 Item	F	P		F	P		F	P		F	P		F	P	F	P
月份 Month	0.49	0.50	3.40		0.09	6.89		0.02	1.57		0.23	6.60		0.02	3.49	0.09
处理 Treatment	2.19	0.14	0.99		0.43	3.23		0.06	3.43		0.05	0.84		0.50	0.41	0.75
月份×处理 Month×Treatment	0.86	0.49	0.91		0.46	2.75		0.09	1.25		0.34	0.91		0.47	1.81	0.20

项目 Item	有机质 Soil organic matter	全氮 Total N	有效磷 Available P	速效钾 Available K	pH
PC1得分 PC1 scores	-0.10	-0.23	-0.55^*	-0.38	-0.30
PC2得分 PC2 scores	0.09	0.02	0.39	0.01	-0.33
总密度 Total density	-0.18	-0.26	-0.51^*	-0.21	-0.20
食细菌类群 Bacterivores	-0.41	-0.36	-0.53^*	-0.43	-0.28
食真菌类群 Fungivores	-0.01	-0.16	-0.41	-0.17	-0.22
植物寄生类群 Plant-parasites	0.04	-0.02	-0.51^*	-0.21	-0.30
捕食-杂食类群 Predators-Omnivores	-0.05	-0.25	-0.21	-0.04	0.00
Shannon-Wiener多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener index (H')	-0.40	-0.42	-0.32	-0.57^*	-0.37
类群数 Group number	-0.31	-0.14	-0.19	-0.52^*	-0.30
自由生活成熟指数 Free-living nematode maturity index (MI)	0.06	0.23	0.03	0.09	0.11
植物寄生成熟指数 Plant-parasite index (PPI)	0.24	0.01	-0.04	0.10	-0.12
线虫通路比值 Channel ratio (CR)	-0.37	-0.25	0.01	-0.26	-0.21
瓦斯乐斯卡指数 Wasilewska index (WI)	-0.39	-0.43	0.12	-0.31	-0.17

[1]	姜熠辉, 刘岳, 曾旭, 林喆滢, 王楠, 彭吉豪, 曹玲, 曾聪. 东海六个国家级海洋保护区鱼类多样性和连通性[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24128-.
[2]	田瑜, 李俊生. 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》“3030”目标的内涵及实现路径分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24086-.
[3]	连佳丽, 陈婧, 杨雪琴, 赵莹, 罗叙, 韩翠, 赵雅欣, 李建平. 荒漠草原植物多样性和微生物多样性对降水变化的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24044-.
[4]	王腾, 李纯厚, 王广华, 赵金发, 石娟, 谢宏宇, 刘永, 刘玉. 西沙群岛七连屿珊瑚礁鱼类的物种组成与演替[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 23481-.
[5]	宋芬, 周芸芸, 黄太福, 杨存存, 于桂清, 田书荣, 向左甫. 基于红外相机技术的林麝行为PAE编码与多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24042-.
[6]	马碧玉. 印度《生物多样性法》修订述要及对我国完善生物多样性保护法制的启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23412-.
[7]	蔡颖莉, 朱洪革, 李家欣. 中国生物多样性保护政策演进、主要措施与发展趋势[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23386-.
[8]	邝起宇, 胡亮. 广东东海岛与硇洲岛海域底栖贝类物种多样性及其地理分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 24065-.
[9]	艾妍雨, 胡海霞, 沈婷, 莫雨轩, 杞金华, 宋亮. 附生维管植物多样性及其与宿主特征的相关性: 以哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 24072-.
[10]	姚祝, 魏雪, 马金豪, 任晓, 王玉英, 胡雷, 吴鹏飞. 气候暖湿化对高寒草甸土壤线虫群落的短期影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23483-.
[11]	赵勇强, 阎玺羽, 谢加琪, 侯梦婷, 陈丹梅, 臧丽鹏, 刘庆福, 隋明浈, 张广奇. 退化喀斯特森林自然恢复中不同生活史阶段木本植物物种多样性与群落构建[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23462-.
[12]	鄢德奎. 中国生物多样性保护政策的共同要素、不足和优化建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23293-.
[13]	赵富伟, 李颖硕, 陈慧. 新时期我国生物多样性法制建设思考[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 24027-.
[14]	徐伟强, 苏强. 分形模型与一般性物种多度分布关系的检验解析:以贝类和昆虫群落为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23410-.
[15]	郑梦瑶, 李媛, 王雪蓉, 张越, 贾彤. 芦芽山不同植被类型土壤原生动物群落构建机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23419-.