生物多样性

• • 上一篇    下一篇

氮输入驱动的关键生态过程对生物多样性的影响及其管理启示

卢晓强1, 芮丹2, 张江峰3, 尹冰鑫1,4, 王雨露1,4, 岑雨婷1,5, 崔怡晨1,5, 杨万霞5*   

  1. 1. 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所, 南京 210042; 2. 安庆市潜山市生态环境分局, 安徽潜山 246300; 3. 磐安县自然生态保护中心, 浙江磐安 322300; 4. 河海大学, 南京 210024;5. 南京林业大学, 南京 210037
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-14 修回日期:2025-12-27 接受日期:2026-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 杨万霞
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金委员会国际(地区)合作与交流项目(41961144022)

Impacts of nitrogen inputs-driven key ecological processes on biodiversity and their management implications

Xiaoqiang Lu1, Dan Rui2, Jiangfeng Zhang3, Bingxin Yin1,4, Yulu Wang1,4, Yuting Cen1,5, Yichen Cui1,5, Wanxia Yang5*   

  1. 1 Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042 China 2 Qianshan Branch of Anqing Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau, Qianshan, Anhui 246300 China 3 Pan’an County Natural Ecology Conservation Center, Pan’an, Zhejiang 322300 China 4 Hehai University, Nanjing 210024 China 5 Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037 China
  • Received:2025-09-14 Revised:2025-12-27 Accepted:2026-01-15
  • Contact: Wanxia Yang
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41961144022)

摘要: 氮输入及其驱动的关键生态过程(如氮沉降、氮转化与氮有效性变化)是影响生态系统结构与功能的核心生物地球化学基础, 其长期扰动已成为全球生物多样性丧失与生态系统退化的重要驱动因素。大气氮沉降与农业面源氮输入引发的土壤酸化、水体富营养化、生境退化及外来物种入侵等效应, 正加剧对生态系统稳定性的破坏。近年来, 借助分子生物学、遥感监测与人工智能等技术手段, 对氮输入及其关键生态过程与生物多样性交互关系的认识不断深化。研究表明, 适度氮输入可促进生物多样性提升, 而长期或过量氮输入则导致物种多样性下降、群落结构趋同和生态系统功能下降。目前, 以氮输入及其关键生态过程为核心的研究已广泛应用于生物多样性监测、生态风险评估与生态修复实践等。本文系统梳理近年国内外研究进展, 归纳氮输入及其关键动态影响生物多样性的核心过程与典型实践案例, 剖析制约研究成果转化的关键障碍, 并提出构建多源数据平台、推动监测体系标准化、强化政策协同等未来发展方向, 旨在推动氮输入及其关键生态过程研究成果在生物多样性保护中的深度应用, 服务生态文明建设与“昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架”的落地实施。

关键词: 生物多样性保护, 氮输入, 关键生态过程, 功能多样性, 生态系统稳定性, 生态恢复

Abstract

Background & Aim:Human activities have substantially altered natural nitrogen (N) regimes, resulting in a marked increase in reactive nitrogen entering terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Nitrogen inputs, together with the key ecological processes they drive—such as atmospheric deposition, nitrogen transformation, and changes in nitrogen availability—play a central role in shaping ecosystem structure and functioning. Excess nitrogen inputs disrupt ecological balance through soil acidification, aquatic eutrophication, habitat degradation, and the spread of invasive species, thereby exerting persistent pressure on biodiversity. As biodiversity loss has become a global environmental concern, increasing attention has been directed toward understanding how externally driven nitrogen inputs influence ecological processes most closely linked to species coexistence, community assembly, and ecosystem stability. Rather than treating N inputs driven processes as a closed biogeochemical system, recent studies have emphasized nitrogen inputs as a dominant external driver with direct ecological relevance. At the same time, advances in molecular techniques, remote sensing, and large-scale ecological monitoring have provided new opportunities to examine nitrogen–biodiversity relationships across spatial and organizational scales. 

Progresses:A growing body of evidence demonstrates that the ecological consequences of nitrogen inputs are strongly context dependent. In ecosystems characterized by low background nitrogen availability, moderate nitrogen enrichment may temporarily enhance primary productivity and, in some cases, support short-term increases in local biodiversity. In contrast, sustained or excessive nitrogen inputs are consistently associated with negative biodiversity outcomes, including species loss, community homogenization, and functional simplification. These effects are mediated by multiple interacting processes, such as shifts in soil physicochemical conditions, altered nitrogen availability and stoichiometric balance, and changes in microbially regulated nitrogen transformation pathways. Nitrogen enrichment often favors fast-growing, resource-acquisitive species, intensifying competitive exclusion and reducing niche differentiation, while simultaneously restructuring microbial communities and their functional capacities. Importantly, biodiversity itself can influence nitrogen dynamics. Functional diversity among plants, microorganisms, and soil fauna contributes to more efficient nitrogen use, reduced nitrogen losses, and greater ecosystem resistance to external nitrogen stress. Building on these insights, research on nitrogen inputs and associated ecological processes has increasingly informed biodiversity monitoring, ecological risk assessment, and ecosystem restoration, highlighting the practical relevance of process-oriented nitrogen research. 

Perspectives:Despite substantial progress, significant challenges remain in translating scientific understanding of nitrogen–biodiversity interactions into effective management and policy actions. Data relevant to nitrogen inputs and biodiversity responses are often fragmented across ecosystems, spatial scales, and disciplinary domains, limiting integrative analysis. In addition, monitoring approaches and indicators remain insufficiently standardized, constraining comparisons among regions and long-term assessments. Nitrogen management policies are frequently developed in isolation from biodiversity objectives, reducing the potential for synergistic outcomes. Future research should therefore focus on integrating multi-source datasets, including field observations, molecular information, and remote sensing products, to better capture the dynamics of nitrogen-driven biodiversity change. Developing standardized, process-based monitoring frameworks will be essential for linking nitrogen inputs to biodiversity responses in a policy-relevant manner. Strengthening coordination across sectors—particularly agriculture, environmental management, and biodiversity conservation—will further support the incorporation of nitrogen considerations into governance and decision-making. By adopting a process-informed perspective that explicitly connects nitrogen inputs, key ecological processes, and biodiversity outcomes, research in this field can provide more robust support for ecosystem restoration, adaptive management, and the implementation of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

Key words: biodiversity conservation, nitrogen inputs, key ecological processes, functional diversity, ecosystem stability, ecological restoration