被动声学监测技术在陆生哺乳动物研究中的应用、进展和展望

doi:10.17520/biods.2022374

生物多样性 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 22374. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022374

• 中国野生脊椎动物鸣声监测与生物声学研究专题 • 上一篇下一篇

被动声学监测技术在陆生哺乳动物研究中的应用、进展和展望

马海港¹, 范鹏来²^,³^,^*()

1.中山大学生命科学学院, 广州 510275
2.珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护教育部重点实验室, 广西桂林 541006
3.广西师范大学生命科学学院, 动物生态学重点实验室, 广西桂林 541006

收稿日期:2022-07-01 接受日期:2022-10-28 出版日期:2023-01-20 发布日期:2022-12-02
通讯作者: *范鹏来, E-mail: fanpl@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31900335);广西自然科学基金粤桂联合重点项目(2022GXNSFDA080004);广西科技基地和人才专项(桂科AD21220028(桂科AD21220028)

Application, progress, and future perspective of passive acoustic monitoring in terrestrial mammal research

Haigang Ma¹, Penglai Fan²^,³^,^*()

1. School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275
2. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guilin, Guangxi 541006
3. Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi 541006

Received:2022-07-01 Accepted:2022-10-28 Online:2023-01-20 Published:2022-12-02
Contact: *Penglai Fan, E-mail: fanpl@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

被动声学监测(passive acoustic monitoring, PAM)技术指将自动录音机安装在自然环境中收集野生动物及其所在环境的声音信号的监测方法。20世纪90年代以来, PAM技术陆续被应用于翼手目和灵长目等陆生哺乳动物的监测和研究, 探究了陆生哺乳动物行为学、生态学和保护生物学等方面的科学问题。然而, 当前缺乏对这些研究的系统性总结和展望。本文从活动规律和时间分配、栖息地利用、物种分布、种群大小与密度、生物多样性、人为干扰的影响等领域综述了PAM技术在陆生哺乳动物中的研究进展, 并列举了相关应用实例。总体上, PAM技术涉及到生物学、生态学、声学、计算机科学等多学科的交叉融合, 其应用受限于声学数据的储存和管理、物种或个体自动化识别以及声学指数评估的普适性, 设备价格也相对昂贵, 这些可能是导致该技术在我国陆生哺乳动物监测和研究方面的应用还相对滞后于其他国家的原因。最后, 本文对未来研究方向进行了展望, 并建议尽快建立和完善我国陆生哺乳动物PAM网络和数据共享平台、组织开展面对面访问调查或生物多样性保护相关的知识竞赛等公民科学项目、向更多科研机构或保护区推广PAM技术的应用, 使该技术成为陆生哺乳动物行为学、生态学、生物多样性保护等领域不可或缺的技术手段, 进一步服务于我国的生物多样性保护和生态文明建设。

关键词: 野生动物, 被动声学监测, 声音通讯, 生物多样性保护

Abstract

Background & Aims: Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is an observational method that collects acoustic signals of wildlife and the surrounding environment using automatic sound recorders. PAM itself is a multidisciplinary technique, integrating biology, ecology, acoustics, and computer science, and was developed in the 1990s first to study bats and primates. Since then, PAM has been utilized in a variety of research contexts to study animal behavior, ecology, and conservation biology. However, a systematic review of the progress of the field is lacking.

Progress: Here, we review how PAM has been used to monitor terrestrial mammal activity patterns, habitat use, species distribution, population size and density, biodiversity, and human influence. We also identify factors which prevent its wider application, such as the complexity of storing and managing acoustic data, limitations of acoustic indices, challenges associated with automated identification of species or individuals, and the overall cost of equipment. As a consequence, we observe limited use of PAM in terrestrial mammal research, especially in China.

Perspective: Finally, we discuss potential novel applications of PAM to study terrestrial mammals. We highlight the importance of establishing and improving standardized PAM networks and data management platforms, developing citizen science programs, encouraging participation of more scientific institutions, and expanding the presence of acoustic monitors particularly throughout protected areas. PAM is an indispensable technique which can further support efforts to conserve biodiversity and increase ecological consciousness in China.

Key words: wildlife, passive acoustic monitoring (PAM), vocal communication, biodiversity conservation

马海港, 范鹏来 (2023) 被动声学监测技术在陆生哺乳动物研究中的应用、进展和展望. 生物多样性, 31, 22374. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022374.

Haigang Ma, Penglai Fan (2023) Application, progress, and future perspective of passive acoustic monitoring in terrestrial mammal research. Biodiversity Science, 31, 22374. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022374.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2022374

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2023/V31/I1/22374

参考文献 102

[1]	Aide TM, Corrada-Bravo C, Campos-Cerqueira M, Milan C, Vega G, Alvarez R (2013) Real-time bioacoustics monitoring and automated species identification. PeerJ, 1, e103.
[2]	Anders F, Kalan AK, Kühl HS, Fuchs M (2021) Compensating class imbalance for acoustic chimpanzee detection with convolutional recurrent neural networks. Ecological Informatics, 65, 101423.
[3]	Andreassen T, Surlykke A, Hallam J (2014) Semi-automatic long-term acoustic surveying: A case study with bats. Ecological Informatics, 21, 13-24. DOI URL
[4]	Astaras C, MacDonald DW, Wrege P, Linder JM (2015) Darwin Initiative Annual Report: Improving Anti-Poaching Patrol Evaluation and Design in African Rainforests. https://www.darwininitiative.org.uk/project/DAR20012/. (accessed on 2022-06-09)
[5]	Banner KM, Irvine KM, Rodhouse TJ, Wright WJ, Rodriguez RM, Litt AR (2018) Improving geographically extensive acoustic survey designs for modeling species occurrence with imperfect detection and misidentification. Ecology and Evolution, 8, 6144-6156. DOI PMID
[6]	Blumstein DT, Daniel JC (2004) Yellow-bellied marmots discriminate among the alarm calls of individuals and are more responsive to the calls from juveniles. Animal Behaviour, 68, 1257-1265. DOI URL
[7]	Blumstein DT, Mennill DJ, Clemins P, Girod L, Yao K, Patricelli G, Deppe JL, Krakauer AH, Clark C, Cortopassi KA, Hanser SF, McCowan B, Ali AM, Kirschel ANG (2011) Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: Applications, technological considerations and prospectus. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 758-767. DOI URL
[8]	Brandes ST (2008) Automated sound recording and analysis techniques for bird surveys and conservation. Bird Conservation International, 18, S163-S173.
[9]	Buckland ST, Plumptre AJ, Thomas L, Rexstad EA (2010) Line transect sampling of primates: Can animal-to-observer distance methods work? International Journal of Primatology, 31, 485-499. DOI URL
[10]	Cai XL, Liao WM, Zhang TH, Li XM, Chen FP, Deng RG (2010) Classification and evaluation of forest soundscape types. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 32, 1195-1201. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[蔡学林, 廖为明, 张天海, 李小毛, 陈飞平, 邓荣根 (2010) 森林声景类型的划分与评价初探. 江西农业大学学报, 32, 1195-1201.]
[11]	Charlton BD, Keating JL, Li R, Huang Y, Swaisgood RR (2010) Female giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) chirps advertise the caller’s fertile phase. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 1101-1106.
[12]	Chen YF, Luo Y, Mammides C, Cao KF, Goodale E (2021) The relationship between acoustic indices, elevation, and vegetation, in a forest plot network of southern China. Ecological Indicators, 129, 107942.
[13]	Clark CW (1980) A real-time direction finding device for determining the bearing to the underwater sounds of southern right whales, Eubalaena australis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 508-511. DOI URL
[14]	Comazzi C, Mattiello S, Friard O, Filacorda S, Gamba M (2016) Acoustic monitoring of golden jackals in Europe: Setting the frame for future analyses. Bioacoustics, 25, 267-278. DOI URL
[15]	Cosentino BJ, Marsh DM, Jones KS, Apodaca JJ, Bates C, Beach J, Beard KH, Becklin K, Bell JM, Crocketti C, Fawson G, Fjelsted J, Forys EA, Genet KS, Grover M, Holmes J, Indeck K, Karraker NE, Kilpatrick ES, Langen TA, Mugel SG, Molina A, Vonesh JR, Weaver RJ, Willey A (2014) Citizen science reveals widespread negative effects of roads on amphibian distributions. Biological Conservation, 180, 31-38. DOI URL
[16]	Cvikel N, Levin E, Hurme E, Borissov I, Boonman A, Amichai E, Yovel Y (2015) On-board recordings reveal no jamming avoidance in wild bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20142274.
[17]	Dena S, Rebouças R, Augusto-Alves G, Toledo LF (2018) Lessons from recordings lost in Brazil fire: Deposit and back up. Nature, 563, 473.
[18]	Duarte MH, Kaizer MC, Young RJ, Rodrigues M, Sousa-Lima RS (2018) Mining noise affects loud call structures and emission patterns of wild black-fronted titi monkeys. Primates, 59, 89-97. DOI PMID
[19]	Dubos N, Kerbiriou C, Julien JF, Barbaro L, Barre K, Claireau F, Froidevaux J, Le Viol I, Lorrilliere R, Roemer C, Verfaillie F, Bas Y (2021) Going beyond species richness and abundance: Robustness of community specialisation measures in short acoustic surveys. Biodiversity and Conservation, 30, 343-363. DOI URL
[20]	Dufourq E, Durbach I, Hansford JP, Hoepfner A, Ma H, Bryant JV, Stender CS, Li WY, Liu Z W, Chen Q, Zhou ZL, Turvey ST (2021) Automated detection of Hainan gibbon calls for passive acoustic monitoring. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 7, 475-487. DOI URL
[21]	Enari H, Enari H, Okuda K, Yoshita M, Kuno T, Okuda K (2017) Feasibility assessment of active and passive acoustic monitoring of sika deer populations. Ecological Indicators, 79, 155-162. DOI URL
[22]	Evers CR, Wardropper CB, Branoff B, Granek EF, Hirsch SL, Link TE, Olivero-Lora S, Wilson C (2018) The ecosystem services and biodiversity of novel ecosystems: A literature review. Global Ecology and Conservation, 13, e00362.
[23]	Fairbrass AJ, Rennett P, Williams C, Titheridge H, Jones KE (2017) Biases of acoustic indices measuring biodiversity in urban areas. Ecological Indicators, 83, 169-177. DOI URL
[24]	Fan PL, Liu RS, Grueter CC, Li F, Wu F, Huan, TP, Yao H, Liu DZ, Liu XC (2019) Individuality in coo calls of adult male golden snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) living in a multilevel society. Animal Cognition, 22, 71-79. DOI PMID
[25]	Farina A, Pieretti N, Piccioli L (2011) The soundscape methodology for long-term bird monitoring: A Mediterranean Europe case-study. Ecological Informatics, 6, 354-363. DOI URL
[26]	Francomano D, Valenzuela A, Gottesman BL, González-Calderón A, Anderson CB, Hardiman BS, Pijanowski BC (2021) Acoustic monitoring shows invasive beavers Castor canadensis increase patch‐level avian diversity in Tierra del Fuego. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58, 2987-2998. DOI URL
[27]	Fripp D, Owen C, Quintana-Rizzo E, Shapiro A, Buckstaff K, Jankowski K, Wells R, Tyack P (2005) Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) calves appear to model their signature whistles on the signature whistles of community members. Animal Cognition, 8, 17-26. PMID
[28]	Froidevaux JSP, Zellweger F, Bollmann K, Obrist MK (2014) Optimizing passive acoustic sampling of bats in forests. Ecology and Evolution, 4, 4690-4700. DOI PMID
[29]	Garland L, Crosby A, Hedley R, Boutin S, Bayne E (2020) Acoustic vs. photographic monitoring of gray wolves (Canis lupus): A methodological comparison of two passive monitoring techniques. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 98, 219-228. DOI URL
[30]	Gasc A, Sueur J, Jiguet F, Devictor V, Grandcolas P, Burrow C, Depraetere M, Pavoine S (2013) Assessing biodiversity with sound: Do acoustic diversity indices reflect phylogenetic and functional diversities of bird communities? Ecological Indicators, 25, 279-287. DOI URL
[31]	Gomes D, Appel G, Barber JR (2020) Time of night and moonlight structure vertical space use by insectivorous bats in a neotropical rainforest: An acoustic monitoring study. PeerJ, 8, e10591.
[32]	Grooten M, Almond REA (2018) Living Planet Report 2018:Aiming Higher. https://www.worldwildlife.org/pages/living-planet-report-2018. (accessed on 2022-06-09)
[33]	Hagens SV, Rendall AR, Whisson DA (2018) Passive acoustic surveys for predicting species’ distributions: Optimising detection probability. PLoS ONE, 13, e0199396.
[34]	Harris SA, Shears NT, Radford CA (2016) Ecoacoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity on temperate reefs. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 713-724. DOI URL
[35]	Hawkins AD, Amorim MCP (2000) Spawning sounds of the male haddock, Melanogrammus aeglefinus. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 59, 29-41. DOI URL
[36]	Heigl F, Kieslinger B, Paul KT, Uhlik J, Dörler D (2019) Opinion: Toward an international definition of citizen science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 116, 8089-8092.
[37]	Heinicke S, Kalan AK, Wagner OJJ, Mundry R, Lukashevich H, Kuehl HS (2015) Assessing the performance of a semi-automated acoustic monitoring system for primates. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 753-763. DOI URL
[38]	Hending D, Holderied M, McCabe G (2017) The use of vocalizations of the Sambirano mouse lemur (Microcebus sambiranensis) in an acoustic survey of habitat preference. International Journal of Primatology, 38, 732-750. DOI PMID
[39]	Hui A (2022) Listening to extinction: Early conservation radio sounds and the silences of species. The American Historical Review, 126, 1371-1395. DOI URL
[40]	Jeliazkov A, Bas Y, Kerbiriou C, Julien JF, Penone C, Le Viol I (2016) Large-scale semi-automated acoustic monitoring allows to detect temporal decline of bush-crickets. Global Ecology and Conservation, 6, 208-218. DOI URL
[41]	Jiang JG, Shao XY, Wan HB, Qi JG, Jing CW, Cheng TY (2016) Bird diversity research using audio record files and the spectrogram segmentation method. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 7713-7723. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[蒋锦刚, 邵小云, 万海波, 齐家国, 荆长伟, 程天 (2016) 基于语谱图特征信息分割提取的声景中鸟类生物多样性分析. 生态学报, 36, 7713-7723.]
[42]	Johnson CN, Balmford A, Brook BW, Buettel JC, Galetti M, Guangchun L, Wilmshurst JM (2017) Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science, 356, 270-275.
[43]	Kalan AK, Piel AK, Mundry R, Wittig RM, Boesch C, Kühl HS (2016) Passive acoustic monitoring reveals group ranging and territory use: A case study of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Frontiers in Zoology, 13, 34. DOI PMID
[44]	Kasten EP, Gage SH, Fox J, Joo W (2012) The remote environmental assessment laboratory’s acoustic library: An archive for studying soundscape ecology. Ecological Informatics, 12, 50-67.
[45]	Lellouch L, Pavoine S, Jiguet F, Glotin H, Sueur J (2014) Monitoring temporal change of bird communities with dissimilarity acoustic indices. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 495-505. DOI URL
[46]	Li YH (2021) A review on estimating population size of large and medium-sized mammals. Biodiversity Science, 29, 1700-1717. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[李月辉 (2021) 大中型兽类种群数量估算的研究进展. 生物多样性, 29, 1700-1717.] DOI
[47]	Liu XH, Wu PF, He XB, Zhao XY (2018) Application and data mining of infra-red camera in the monitoring of species. Biodiversity Science, 26, 850-861. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[刘雪华, 武鹏峰, 何祥博, 赵翔宇 (2018) 红外相机技术在物种监测中的应用及数据挖掘. 生物多样性, 26, 850-861.] DOI
[48]	Lobel PS (2002) Diversity of fish spawning sounds and the application of passive acoustic monitoring. Bioacoustics, 12, 286-289. DOI URL
[49]	Lomolino MV, Pijanowski BC, Gasc A (2015) The silence of biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 42, 1187-1196. DOI URL
[50]	Luo B, Huang XB, Li YY, Lu GJ, Zhao JL, Zhang KK, Zhao HB, Liu Y, Feng J (2017) Social call divergence in bats: A comparative analysis. Behavioral Ecology, 28, 533-540.
[51]	Lynch E, Angeloni L, Fristrup K, Joyce D, Wittemyer G (2013) The use of on-animal acoustical recording devices for studying animal behavior. Ecology and Evolution, 3, 2030-2037. DOI PMID
[52]	Ma HG, Ma CY, Fei HL, Yang L, Fan PF (2020) Cao vit gibbons (Nomascus nasutus) sing at higher elevation but not in peripheral areas of their home range in a karst forest. International Journal of Primatology, 2, 1-13. DOI URL
[53]	MacSwiney GMC, Avila-Flores R, Pech-Canché JM (2020) Richness and activity of arthropodophagous bats in an arid landscape of central México. Therya, 11, 1-10. DOI URL
[54]	MacSwiney GMC, Clarke FM, Racey PA (2008) What you see is not what you get: The role of ultrasonic detectors in increasing inventory completeness in neotropical bat assemblages. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 1364-1371. DOI URL
[55]	Markolf M, Zinowsky M, Keller JK, Borys J, Cillov A, Schuelke O (2022) Toward passive acoustic monitoring of lemurs: Using an affordable open-source system to monitor Phaner vocal activity and density. International Journal of Primatology, 43, 409-433. DOI URL
[56]	McGregor PK (2005) Animal Communication Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[57]	Mellinger DK, Heimlich SL (2013) Introduction to the special issue on methods for marine mammal passive acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, 2381-2382. DOI URL
[58]	Milich KM, Bahr JM, Stumpf RM, Chapman CA (2014) Timing is everything: Expanding the cost of sexual attraction hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 88, 219-224. DOI URL
[59]	Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853-858. DOI URL
[60]	Nascimento LD, Granados CP, Beard KH (2021) Passive acoustic monitoring and automatic detection of diel patterns and acoustic structure of howler monkey roars. Diversity, 13, 566. DOI URL
[61]	Newson SE, Evans HE, Gillings S (2015) A novel citizen science approach for large-scale standardised monitoring of bat activity and distribution, evaluated in eastern England. Biological Conservation, 191, 38-49. DOI URL
[62]	Nordeide J, Kjellsby E (1999) Sound from spawning cod at their spawning grounds. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56, 326-332. DOI URL
[63]	Obrist MK, Pavan G, Sueur J, Riede K, Llusia D, Marquez R (2010) Bioacoustics approaches in biodiversity inventories. In: Manual on Field Recording Techniques and Protocols for All Taxa Biodiversity Inventories, Vol. 8 (Part I) (eds Eymann J, Degreef J, Häuser C, Monje JC, Samyn Y, Vandenspiegel D), pp. 68-99. ABC Taxa, Belgium.
[64]	Odom KJ, Araya-Salas M, Morano JL, Ligon RA, Leighton GM, Taff CC, Dalziell AH, Billings AC, Germain RR, Pardo M, de Andrade LG, Hedwig D, Keen SC, Shiu Y, Charif RA, Webster MS, Rice AN (2021) Comparative bioacoustics: A roadmap for quantifying and comparing animal sounds across diverse taxa. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 96, 1135-1159. DOI PMID
[65]	Owen KC, Melin AD, Campos FA, Fedigan LM, Gillespie TW, Mennill DJ (2020) Bioacoustic analyses reveal that bird communities recover with forest succession in tropical dry forests. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 15, 25.
[66]	Papin M, Pichenot J, Guérold F, Germain E (2018) Acoustic localization at large scales: A promising method for grey wolf monitoring. Frontiers in Zoology, 15, 1-10. DOI URL
[67]	Parker TA (1991) On the use of tape recorders in avifaunal surveys. Auk, 108, 443-444.
[68]	Payne KB, Thompson M, Kramer L (2003) Elephant calling patterns as indicators of group size and composition: The basis for an acoustic monitoring system. African Journal of Ecology, 41, 99-107. DOI URL
[69]	Pekin BK, Jung J, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Pijanowski BC, Ahumada JA (2012) Modeling acoustic diversity using soundscape recordings and LIDAR-derived metrics of vertical forest structure in a neotropical rainforest. Landscape Ecology, 27, 1513-1522. DOI URL
[70]	Piel AK (2018) Temporal patterns of chimpanzee loud calls in the Issa Valley, Tanzania: Evidence of nocturnal acoustic behavior in wild chimpanzees. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 166, 530-540. DOI PMID
[71]	Piel AK, Crunchant A, Knot IE, Chalmers C, Fergus P, Mulero-Pázmány M, Wich SA (2022) Noninvasive technologies for primate conservation in the 21st century. International Journal of Primatology, 43, 133-167. DOI URL
[72]	Pijanowski BC, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Dumyahn SL, Almo F, Krause BL, Napoletano BM, Gage SH, Nadia P (2011) Soundscape ecology: The science of sound in the landscape. BioScience, 61, 203-216. DOI URL
[73]	Riede K (2018) Acoustic profiling of Orthoptera: Present state and future needs. Journal of Orthoptera Research, 27, 203-215. DOI URL
[74]	Roch MA, Batchelor H, Baumann-Pickering S, Berchok CL, Cholewiak D, Fujioka E, Garland EC, Herbert S, Hildebrand JA, Oleson EM, Van Parijs S, Risch D, Širović A, Soldevilla MS (2016) Management of acoustic metadata for bioacoustics. Ecological Informatics, 31, 122-136. DOI URL
[75]	Rosenstock SS, Anderson DR, Giesen KM, Tony L, Carter MF (2002) Landbird counting techniques: Current practices and an alternative. Auk, 119, 46-53. DOI URL
[76]	Saito K, Nakamura K, Ueta M, Kurosawa R, Fujiwara A, Kobayashi HH, Nakayama M, Toko A, Nagahama K (2015) Utilizing the cyberforest live sound system with social media to remotely conduct woodland bird censuses in central Japan. Ambio, 44, 572-583. DOI URL
[77]	Slabbekoorn H, Smith TB (2002) Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: An analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution, 56, 1849-1858. PMID
[78]	Sousa-Lima RS, Norris TF, Oswald JN, Fernandes DP (2013) A review and inventory of fixed autonomous recorders for passive acoustic monitoring of marine mammals. Aquatic Mammals, 39, 23-53. DOI URL
[79]	Spillmann B, van Noordwijk MA, Willems EP, Mitra ST, Wipfli U, van Schaik CP (2015) Validation of an acoustic location system to monitor Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) long calls. American Journal of Primatology, 77, 767-776. DOI PMID
[80]	Sueur J, Farina A (2015) Ecoacoustics: The ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound. Biosemiotics, 8, 493-502. DOI URL
[81]	Sugai LSM, Llusia D (2018) Bioacoustic time capsules: Using acoustic monitoring to document biodiversity. Ecological Indicators, 99, 149-152. DOI URL
[82]	Sugai LSM, Silva TSF, Ribeiro JW, Llusia D (2018) Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: Review and perspectives. BioScience, 69, 15-25. DOI URL
[83]	Supp SR, Bohrer G, Fieberg J, Sorte FAL (2021) Estimating the movements of terrestrial animal populations using broad-scale occurrence data. Movement Ecology, 9, 60. DOI PMID
[84]	Thompson ME, Schwager SJ, Payne KB (2010) Heard but not seen: An acoustic survey of the African forest elephant population at Kakum Conservation Area, Ghana. African Journal of Ecology, 48, 224-231. DOI URL
[85]	Vielliard J (1993) Recording wildlife in tropical rainforest. Bioacoustics, 4, 305-311. DOI URL
[86]	Vu TT, Doherty PF (2021) Using bioacoustics to monitor gibbons. Biodiversity and Conservation, 30, 1189-1198. DOI URL
[87]	Vu TT, Tran LM (2019) An application of autonomous recorders for gibbon monitoring. International Journal of Primatology, 40, 169-186. DOI URL
[88]	Wallis D, Elmeros M (2020) Tracking European bat species with passive acoustic directional monitoring. Bioacoustics, 30, 418-436. DOI URL
[89]	Wang Y, Ye J, Borchers DL (2022) Automated call detection for acoustic surveys with structured calls of varying length. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 1-16. DOI URL
[90]	Wang YY, Zhang YM, Xia CW, Møller AP (2023) A meta-analysis of the effects in alpha acoustic indices. Biodiversity Science, 31, 22369. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王言一, 张屹美, 夏灿玮, Anders Pape Møller (2023) Alpha声学指数效用的meta分析. 生物多样性, 31, 22369.] DOI
[91]	Wei FW (2016) Research progress in conservation biology of endangered mammals in China. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 36, 255-269. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[魏辅文 (2016) 我国濒危哺乳动物保护生物学研究进展. 兽类学报, 36, 255-269.] DOI
[92]	Wei FW, Ma TX, Hu YB (2021) Research advances and perspectives of conservation genetics of threatened mammals in China. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 41, 571-580. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[魏辅文, 马天笑, 胡义波 (2021) 中国濒危兽类保护遗传学研究进展与展望. 兽类学报, 41, 571-580.] DOI
[93]	Weir LA, Mossman MJ (2005) North American amphibian monitoring program (NAAMP). In: Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species (ed. Lanoo M), pp. 307-313. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
[94]	Whytock RC, Christie J (2016) Solo: An open source, customisable and inexpensive audio recorder for bioacoustic research. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 308-312. DOI URL
[95]	Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds:Sound transmission and signal detection. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (Vol. 1) (eds Kroodsma DE, Miller EH), pp. 131-181. Academic Press, New York.
[96]	Wilkins MR, Seddon N, Safran RJ (2013) Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: Causes and consequences. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 156-166. DOI URL
[97]	Wrege PH, Rowland ED, Keen S, Shiu Y (2017) Acoustic monitoring for conservation in tropical forests: Examples from forest elephants. Methods in Ecology & Evolution, 8, 1292-1301.
[98]	Wrege PH, Rowland ED, Thompson BG, Batruch N (2010) Use of acoustic tools to reveal otherwise cryptic responses of forest elephants to oil exploration. Conservation Biology, 24, 1578-1585. DOI PMID
[99]	Wyman MT, Mooring MS, Mccowan B, Penedo M, Reby D, Hart LA (2012) Acoustic cues to size and quality in the vocalizations of male North American bison, Bison bison. Animal Behaviour, 84, 1381-1391. DOI URL
[100]	Zhao Y, Shen XL, Li S, Zhang YY, Peng RH, Ma KP (2020) Progress and outlook for soundscape ecology. Biodiversity Science, 28, 806-820. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[赵莹, 申小莉, 李晟, 张雁云, 彭任华, 马克平 (2020) 声景生态学研究进展和展望. 生物多样性, 28, 806-820.] DOI
[101]	Zhong EZ, Guan ZH, Zhou XC, Zhao YJ, Hu KR (2021) Application of passive acoustic monitoring technology in the monitoring of western black crested gibbons. Biodiversity Science, 29, 109-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[钟恩主, 管振华, 周兴策, 赵友杰, 胡坤融 (2021) 被动声学监测技术在西黑冠长臂猿监测中的应用. 生物多样性, 29, 109-117.]
[102]	Zwerts JA, Stephenson PJ, Maisels F, Rowcliffe M, Astaras C, Jansen PA, Waarde J, Sterck LEHM, Verweij PA, Bruce T, Brittain S, Kuijk M (2021) Methods for wildlife monitoring in tropical forests: Comparing human observations, camera traps, and passive acoustic sensors. Conservation Science and Practice, 3, e568.

被动声学监测技术在陆生哺乳动物研究中的应用、进展和展望

Application, progress, and future perspective of passive acoustic monitoring in terrestrial mammal research

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 102

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	秦涛, 崔荣赫, 宋蕊, 富丽莎. 我国野生动物肇事公众责任保险: 发展模式、现实困境与优化策略[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23431-.
[2]	鲁彬悦, 李坤, 王晨溪, 李晟. 基于传感器标记的野生动物追踪技术在中国的应用现状与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23497-.
[3]	蔡颖莉, 朱洪革, 李家欣. 中国生物多样性保护政策演进、主要措施与发展趋势[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23386-.
[4]	鄢德奎. 中国生物多样性保护政策的共同要素、不足和优化建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23293-.
[5]	刘荆州, 钱易鑫, 张燕雪丹, 崔凤. 基于潜在迪利克雷分布(LDA)模型的旗舰物种范式研究进展与启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23439-.
[6]	韩丽霞, 王永健, 刘宣. 外来物种入侵与本土物种分布区扩张的异同[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23396-.
[7]	朱建国, 王林, 任国鹏. 《国家重点保护野生动物名录》调整的评估方法探讨[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23045-.
[8]	杜红. “物种”与“个体”: 究竟谁是生物多样性保护的恰当对象?[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23140-.
[9]	苏荣菲, 陈睿山, 郭晓娜. 城市社区更新中生物多样性的保护策略: 以上海市长宁区生境花园为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 23118-.
[10]	陈声文, 任海保, 童光蓉, 王宁宁, 蓝文超, 薛建华, 米湘成. 钱江源国家公园木本植物物种多样性空间分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22587-.
[11]	陈金锋, 吴欣静, 林海, 崔国发. 《国家重点保护野生动物名录》和其他保护名录对比分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22639-.
[12]	耿宜佳, 李子圆, 田瑜. 《生物多样性公约》下海洋生物多样性保护的进展、挑战和展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22645-.
[13]	李钊丞, 张燕雪丹. 基于物种濒危状况评价与种群增长的一种新评估方法在水生野生动物保护司法中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22319-.
[14]	邓可, 崔建国. 网络分析法在动物声音通讯及生物声学研究中的应用与前景[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22318-.
[15]	吴科毅, 阮文达, 周棣锋, 陈庆春, 张承云, 潘新园, 余上, 刘阳, 肖荣波. 基于音节聚类分析的被动声学监测技术及其在鸟类监测中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22370-.