现代生物声学的学科发展趋势及中国机遇

doi:10.17520/biods.2022423

生物多样性 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 22423. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022423

• 中国野生脊椎动物鸣声监测与生物声学研究专题 • 上一篇下一篇

现代生物声学的学科发展趋势及中国机遇

肖治术¹^,⁷^,^*(), 崔建国², 王代平³, 王志陶⁴, 罗金红⁵, 谢捷⁶

1.中国科学院动物研究所农业虫害鼠害综合治理研究国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
2.中国科学院成都生物研究所, 成都 610041
3.中国科学院动物研究所动物生态与保护生物学(院)重点实验室, 北京 100101
4.中国科学院水生生物研究所, 武汉 430072
5.华中师范大学生命科学学院, 武汉 430079
6.南京师范大学, 南京 210016
7.中国科学院大学生命科学学院, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2022-07-23 接受日期:2023-01-16 出版日期:2023-01-20 发布日期:2023-01-31
通讯作者: *肖治术, E-mail: xiaozs@ioz.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2022YFF1301401);中国科学院生物多样性监测与研究网络运行经费

Interdisciplinary development trends of contemporary bioacoustics and the opportunities for China

Zhishu Xiao¹^,⁷^,^*(), Jianguo Cui², Daiping Wang³, Zhitao Wang⁴, Jinhong Luo⁵, Jie Xie⁶

1. State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
2. Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041
3. Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
4. Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072
5. School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
6. Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210016
7. School of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received:2022-07-23 Accepted:2023-01-16 Online:2023-01-20 Published:2023-01-31
Contact: *Zhishu Xiao, E-mail: xiaozs@ioz.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着数字录音技术、电子学和微电子学、人工智能、信息科学等跨学科领域的技术革新, 现代生物声学逐渐与生物学、生态学等学科及关联学科之间形成了广泛的交叉前沿领域。现阶段, 现代生物声学主要以生物学、生态学等基础学科的理论方法为指导, 着重于揭示环境中各类声音在生物之间以及生物与人类、环境之间的相互作用及相关科学规律, 为人类认识、保护和利用生物声学资源提供理论基础和解决方案。本文重点阐述了现代生物声学的学科内涵和学科特征, 介绍了动物生物声学、生态声学、水下生物声学、环境生物声学、保护生物声学、计算生物声学以及现代生物声学研究的技术框架等前沿热点和发展趋势, 评估了中国生物声学研究的学科现状与发展机遇, 并对未来学科建设进行了展望。

关键词: 动物生物声学, 生态声学, 水下生物声学, 环境生物声学, 保护生物声学, 计算生物声学, 人类噪声, 被动声学监测, 交叉科学

Abstract

Background: Contemporary bioacoustics is an interdisciplinary science by combining biology and ecology with acoustics. Through the mutual penetration and integration of technological innovation and many disciplinary fields from natural and social science, it has gradually formed the characteristics of transdisciplinary fields, such as strong compatibility, high technological dependence, and wide application scenarios. Though bioacoustics has expanded into many interdisciplinary fields and application scenarios, a comprehensive understanding of bioacoustics as a discipline in scientific communities at home and abroad are still lacking. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically evaluate the development status, main research issues and frontier topics of contemporary bioacoustics.

Scope of bioacoustics: Contemporary bioacoustics is a new interdisciplinary science that studies the relationship between sounds of organisms and their ecological environment. With the technological innovation and application of interdisciplinary fields such as digital recording, electronics and microelectronics, artificial intelligence and information science, the research depth and breadth of contemporary bioacoustics are continually expanding, and it has gradually formed a diversified frontier issues with biology, ecology and other disciplines. Currently, bioacoustics is mainly guided by theories and methods from basic disciplines of biology and ecology. The research focus is to reveal the interaction and scientific theories of various sounds among organisms, and among organisms, human beings and the environment in the natural and man-made environment, so as to provide theoretical basis and solutions for human beings to recognize, protect and utilize bioacoustic resources.

Aims: By reviewing relevant literature at home and abroad, combined with our practice and thinking, this paper focuses on the interdisciplinary properties and key topics of contemporary bioacoustics, and introduces frontier topics and development trends in animal bioacoustics, ecological acoustics, underwater bioacoustics, environmental bioacoustics, conservation bioacoustics, computational bioacoustics, and bioacoustic monitoring and analysis. The status and development opportunities of bioacoustics research in China are also evaluated and analyzed, and the future discipline construction is prospected.

Conclusions: Bioacoustic research is conducive to the fully understanding and scientific use of bioacoustic resources and related scientific theories. Its achievements can be used as scientific guidance and decision-making basis for life health and biosafety, the conservation and utilization of bioacoustic resources and the protection of ecological environment. In sum, interdisciplinary development of bioacoustics can provide high-quality services for the progress of ecological civilization and the construction of a beautiful and healthy China.

Key words: animal bioacoustics, ecoacoustics, underwater bioacoustics, environmental bioacoustics, conservation bioacoustics, computational bioacoustics, anthropogenic noise, passive acoustic monitoring, interdisciplinary science

肖治术, 崔建国, 王代平, 王志陶, 罗金红, 谢捷 (2023) 现代生物声学的学科发展趋势及中国机遇. 生物多样性, 31, 22423. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022423.

Zhishu Xiao, Jianguo Cui, Daiping Wang, Zhitao Wang, Jinhong Luo, Jie Xie (2023) Interdisciplinary development trends of contemporary bioacoustics and the opportunities for China. Biodiversity Science, 31, 22423. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022423.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2022423

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2023/V31/I1/22423

图/表 2

参考文献 174

[1]	Alonso JB, Cabrera J, Shyamnani R, Travieso CM, Bolaños F, García A, Villegas A, Wainwright M (2017) Automatic anuran identification using noise removal and audio activity detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 72, 83-92. DOI URL
[2]	André M, Solé M, Lenoir M, Durfort M, Quero C, Mas A, Lombarte A, van der Schaar M, López-Bejar M, Morell M, Zaugg S, Houégnigan L (2011) Low-frequency sounds induce acoustic trauma in cephalopods. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 489-493. DOI URL
[3]	Arnett EB, Hein CD, Schirmacher MR, Huso MMP, Szewczak JM (2013) Evaluating the effectiveness of an ultrasonic acoustic deterrent for reducing bat fatalities at wind turbines. PLoS ONE, 8, e65794.
[4]	Au WWL, Hastings MC (2008) Principles of Marine Bioacoustics. Springer, New York.
[5]	Bai C (2019) Preface of special issue on underwater acoustical signal processing and sonar technology. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 34, 251-252. (in Chinese)
	[白春礼 (2019) “水声信号处理和声呐技术发展现状和展望”专题序言. 中国科学院院刊, 34, 251-252.]
[6]	Barber JR, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM (2010) The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 180-189. DOI URL
[7]	Berger-Tal O, Lahoz-Monfort JJ (2018) Conservation technology: The next generation. Conservation Letters, 11, e12458.
[8]	Beyan C, Browman HI (2020) Setting the stage for the machine intelligence era in marine science. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 77, 1267-1273.
[9]	Blumstein DT, Mennill DJ, Clemins P, Girod L, Yao K, Patricelli G, Deppe JL, Krakauer AH, Clark C, Cortopassi KA, Hanser SF, McCowan B, Ali AM, Kirschel ANG (2011) Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: Applications, technological considerations and prospectus. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 758-767. DOI URL
[10]	Bradbury JW, Vehrenkamp SL. 2011. Principles of Animal Communication, 3rd edn. Sinaur Associates Inc., New York.
[11]	Browning E, Gibb R, Glover-Kapfer P, Jones KE (2017) Passive Acoustic Monitoring in Ecology and Conservation. WWF Conservation Technology Series, 1(2), 1-75.
[12]	Brumm H (2013) Animal Communication and Noise (Vol. 2). Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.
[13]	Brumm H, Goymann W, Derégnaucourt S, Geberzahn N, Zollinger SA (2021) Traffic noise disrupts vocal development and suppresses immune function. Science Advances, 7, eabe2405.
[14]	Burivalova Z, Towsey M, Boucher T, Truskinger A, Apelis C, Roe P, Game ET (2018) Using soundscapes to detect variable degrees of human influence on tropical forests in Papua New Guinea. Conservation Biology, 32, 205-215. DOI PMID
[15]	Busnel RG (1963) Acoustic Behavior of Animals. Elsevier, New York.
[16]	Buxton RT, Currey CA, Lyver PO, Jones CJ (2013) Incidence of plastic fragments among burrow-nesting seabird colonies on offshore islands in northern New Zealand. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 74, 420-424. DOI PMID
[17]	Buxton RT, McKenna MF, Clapp M, Meyer E, Stabenau E, Angeloni LM, Crooks K, Wittemyer G (2018) Efficacy of extracting indices from large-scale acoustic recordings to monitor biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 32, 1174-1184. DOI PMID
[18]	Buxton RT, McKenna MF, Mennitt D, Fristrup K, Crooks K, Angeloni L, Wittemyer G (2017) Noise pollution is pervasive in U.S. protected areas. Science, 356, 531-533. DOI PMID
[19]	Chandrakala S, Jayalakshmi SL (2019) Generative model driven representation learning in a hybrid framework for environmental audio scene and sound event recognition. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 22, 3-14. DOI URL
[20]	Chen PX, Liu RJ, Wang D, Zhang XF (1996) Biology, Breeding and Species Protection of Chinese River Dolphin. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[陈佩薰, 刘仁俊, 王丁, 张先锋 (1996) 白暨豚生物学及饲养与物种保护. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[21]	Chen X, Zhao J, Chen YH, Zhou W, Hughes AC (2020) Automatic standardized processing and identification of tropical bat calls using deep learning approaches. Biological Conservation, 241, 108269.
[22]	Cheng JC, Li XD, Yang J (2021) Status and Future Development Trends for Acoustics Discipline. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[程建春, 李晓东, 杨军 (2021) 声学学科现状以及未来发展趋势, 科学出版社, 北京.]
[23]	Cui JG, Song XW, Zhu BC, Fang GZ, Tang YZ, Ryan MJ (2016) Receiver discriminability drives the evolution of complex sexual signals by sexual selection. Evolution, 70, 922-927. DOI PMID
[24]	Cui JG, Tang YZ, Narins PM (2012) Real estate ads in Emei music frog vocalizations: Female preference for calls emanating from burrows. Biology Letters, 8, 337-340. DOI PMID
[25]	Deng K, Yang Y, Cui JG (2021) Call characteristic network reveal geographical patterns of call similarity: Applying network analysis to frog’s call research. Asian Herpetological Research, 12, 110-116.
[26]	Ding P, Jiang SR (2005) Microgeographic song variation in the Chinese bulbul (Pycnonotus sinenesis) in urban areas of Hangzhou City. Zoological Research, 26, 453-459. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[丁平, 姜仕仁 (2005) 杭州市区白头鹎鸣声的微地理差异. 动物学研究, 26, 453-459.]
[27]	Dong EQ, Song ZC, Zhang Y, Ghaffari Mosanenzadeh S, He Q, Zhao XH, Fang NX (2020) Bioinspired metagel with broadband tunable impedance matching. Science Advances, 6, eabb3641.
[28]	Dong EQ, Zhang Y, Song ZC, Zhang TY, Cai C, Fang NX (2019) Physical modeling and validation of porpoises’ directional emission via hybrid metamaterials. National Science Review, 6, 921-928. DOI URL
[29]	Duarte CM, Chapuis L, Collin SP, Costa DP, Devassy RP, Eguiluz VM, Erbe C, Gordon TAC, Halpern BS, Harding HR, Havlik MN, Meekan M, Merchant ND, Miksis-Olds JL, Parsons M, Predragovic M, Radford AN, Radford CA, Simpson SD, Slabbekoorn H, Staaterman E, Van Opzeeland IC, Winderen J, Zhang XL, Juanes F (2021) The soundscape of the anthropocene ocean. Science, 371, eaba4658.
[30]	Dufourq E, Durbach I, Hansford JP, Hoepfner A, Ma HD, Bryant JV, Stender CS, Li WY, Liu ZW, Chen Q, Zhou ZL, Turvey ST (2021) Automated detection of Hainan gibbon calls for passive acoustic monitoring. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 7, 475-487. DOI URL
[31]	Dzhambov A, Dimitrova D (2017) Occupational noise exposure and the risk for work-related injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 61, 1037-1053. DOI PMID
[32]	Eldridge A, Guyot P, Moscoso P, Johnston A, Eyre-Walker Y, Peck M (2018) Sounding out ecoacoustic metrics: Avian species richness is predicted by acoustic indices in temperate but not tropical habitats. Ecological Indicators, 95, 939-952. DOI URL
[33]	Estabrook BJ, Ponirakis DW, Clark CW, Rice AN (2016) Widespread spatial and temporal extent of anthropogenic noise across the northeastern Gulf of Mexico shelf ecosystem. Endangered Species Research, 30, 267-282. DOI URL
[34]	Fan PL, Liu RS, Grueter CC, Li F, Wu F, Huang TP, Yao H, Liu DZ, Liu XC (2019) Individuality in coo calls of adult male golden snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) living in a multilevel society. Animal Cognition, 22, 71-79. DOI PMID
[35]	Fang GZ, Xue F, Yang P, Cui JG, Brauth SE, Tang YZ (2014) Right ear advantage for vocal communication in frogs results from both structural asymmetry and attention modulation. Behavioural Brain Research, 266, 77-84. DOI PMID
[36]	Fang GZ, Yang P, Xue F, Cui JG, Brauth SE, Tang YZ (2015) Sound classification and call discrimination are decoded in order as revealed by event-related potential components in frogs. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 86, 232-245. DOI URL
[37]	Farina A (2014) Soundscape Ecology: Principles, Patterns, Methods and Applications. Springer, New York.
[38]	Farina A, Gage SH (2017) Ecoacoustics: The Ecological Role of Sounds. Wiley, Hoboken.
[39]	Feng AS, Narins PM, Xu CH, Lin WY, Yu ZL, Qiu Q, Xu ZM, Shen JX (2006) Ultrasonic communication in frogs. Nature, 440, 333-336. DOI URL
[40]	Feng J, Chen M, Li ZX, Zhao HH, Zhou J, Zhang SY (2002) Relationship between echolocation frequency and body size in eight species of horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae). Acta Zoologica Sinica, 48, 819-823. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[冯江, 陈敏, 李振新, 赵辉华, 周江, 张树义 (2002) 八种菊头蝠回声定位声波频率与体型的相关性. 动物学报, 48, 819-823.]
[41]	Francis CD, Barber JR (2013) A framework for understanding noise impacts on wildlife: An urgent conservation priority. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 305-313. DOI URL
[42]	Francis CD, Kleist NJ, Ortega CP, Cruz A (2012) Noise pollution alters ecological services:Enhanced pollination and disrupted seed dispersal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 2727-2735.
[43]	Francis CD, Ortega CP, Cruz A (2009) Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions. Current Biology, 19, 1415-1419. DOI PMID
[44]	Fu ZY, Tang J, Hung-Sun JP, Chen QC (2009) Spectrum characteristics of echolocation call and frequency tuning of inferior collicular neurons in Hipposideros armiger. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 44, 128-132. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[付子英, 唐佳, Hung-Sun JP, 陈其才 (2009) 大蹄蝠回声定位信号特征与下丘神经元频率调谐. 动物学杂志, 44, 128-132.]
[45]	Gasc A, Pavoine S, Lellouch L, Grandcolas P, Sueur J (2015) Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessments: Analyses of bias based on simulated bird assemblages and recommendations for field surveys. Biological Conservation, 191, 306-312. DOI URL
[46]	Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic Communication in Insects and Frogs:Common Problems and Diverse Solutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[47]	Guerra V, Llusia D, Gambale PG, de Morais AR, Márquez R, Bastos RP (2018) The advertisement calls of Brazilian anurans: Historical review, current knowledge and future directions. PLoS ONE, 13, e0191691.
[48]	Halfwerk W, Bot S, Buikx J, van der Velde M, Komdeur J ten Cate C, Slabbekoorn H (2011) Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 14549-14554.
[49]	Han LX, Yang L, Zheng BL (1988) The sound spectrographic analyses on the calls of lady amherst’s pheasants (Chrysolophus amherstiae). Zoological Research, 9, 127-132. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[韩联宪, 杨岚, 郑宝赉 (1988) 白腹锦鸡鸣声的声谱分析. 动物学研究, 9, 127-132.]
[50]	Han YC, Jiang SR, Ding P (2004) Effects of ambient noise on the vocal frequency of Chinese bulbuls, Pycnonotus sinenesis in Linan and Fuyang Cities. Zoological Research, 25, 122-126. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[韩轶才, 姜仕仁, 丁平 (2004) 环境噪声对临安和阜阳两地白头鹎鸣声频率的影响. 动物学研究, 25, 122-126.]
[51]	Hang SY, Zhao J, Ji BM, Li HJ, Zhang YD, Peng ZQ, Zhou F, Ding XY, Ye ZY (2021) Impact of underwater noise on the growth, physiology and behavior of Micropterus salmoides in industrial recirculating aquaculture systems. Environmental Pollution, 291, 118152.
[52]	Hao PP, Zhang YY (2020) Acoustic characteristics and vocal rhythms of three pheasant species using automatic recording in Xiaolongmen, Beijing. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 55, 552-559. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郝佩佩, 张雁云 (2020) 基于自动录音技术研究三种雉类鸣叫特征和节律. 动物学杂志, 55, 552-559.]
[53]	He K, Liu Q, Xu DM, Qi FY, Bai J, He SW, Chen P, Zhou X, Cai WZ, Chen ZZ, Liu Z, Jiang XL, Shi P (2021) Echolocation in soft-furred tree mice. Science, 372, eaay1513.
[54]	Henry L, Barbu S, Lemasson A, Hausberger M (2015) Dialects in animals: Evidence, development and potential functions. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 2, 132-155. DOI URL
[55]	Hildebrand J (2004) Sources of Anthropogenic Sound in the Marine Environment. International Policy Workshop on Sound and Marine Mammals, London, UK.
[56]	Hou ZH, Liu YX, Wei SS, Wei C (2022) Females prefer males producing a high-rate song with shorter timbal-stridulatory sound intervals in a cicada species. Current Zoology, 68, 103-112. DOI PMID
[57]	Jiang HS, Feng M, Lin SR (1990) Preliminary investigation on communication behavior of rhesus monkey Macaca mulatta in field. Zoological Research, 11, 303-309. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[江海声, 冯敏, 林淑然 (1990) 野生猕猴(Macaca mulatta)通讯行为的初步研究. 动物学研究, 11, 303-309.]
[58]	Jiang JJ, Wang XQ, Duan FJ, Li CY, Fu X, Huang TT, Bu LR, Ma L, Sun ZB (2018) Bio-inspired covert active sonar strategy. Sensors, 18, 2436. DOI URL
[59]	Jiang SR, Ding P, Shi QS, Zhuge Y (1996a) Studies on the song dialects in Chinese bulbuls. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 42, 361-367. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[姜仕仁, 丁平, 施青松, 诸葛阳 (1996a) 白头鹎方言的初步研究. 动物学报, 42, 361-367.]
[60]	Jiang SR, Ding P, Zhuge Y, Wu YC (1996b) Characteristics off songs of the Chinese bulbul (Pycnonotus sinenesis) in the breeding season. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 42, 253-259. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[姜仕仁, 丁平, 诸葛阳, 邬艳春 (1996b) 白头鹎繁殖期鸣声行为的研究. 动物学报, 42, 253-259.]
[61]	Jiang TL, Guo X, Lin AQ, Wu H, Sun CN, Feng J, Kanwal JS (2019) Bats increase vocal amplitude and decrease vocal complexity to mitigate noise interference during social communication. Animal Cognition, 22, 199-212.
[62]	Jiang XL, Wang YX (1997) The singing ecology and behavior of black-crested gibbons. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 16, 40-48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[蒋学龙, 王应祥 (1997) 黑长臂猿(Hylobates concolor)鸣叫行为研究. 人类学学报, 16, 40-48.]
[63]	Jing XY, Xiao YF, Jing RC (1981) Acoustic signals and behavior of Chinese river dolphin (Lipotes vexillifer). Scientia Sinca, 2, 233-239. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[荆显英, 肖友芙, 景荣才 (1981) 白暨豚(Lipotes vexillifer)的声信号及声行为. 中国科学, 2, 233-239.]
[64]	Kight CR, Swaddle JP (2011) How and why environmental noise impacts animals: An integrative, mechanistic review. Ecology Letters, 14, 1052-1061. DOI PMID
[65]	Kleist NJ, Guralnick RP, Cruz A, Lowry CA, Francis CD (2018) Chronic anthropogenic noise disrupts glucocorticoid signaling and has multiple effects on fitness in an avian community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, E648-E657.
[66]	Köhler J, Jansen M, Rodríguez A, Kok PJR, Toledo LF, Emmrich M, Glaw F, Haddad CFB, Rödel MO, Vences M (2017) The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: Theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa, 4251, 1-124. DOI PMID
[67]	Krause BL (1993) The niche hypothesis: A virtual symphony of animal sounds, the origins of musical expression and the health of habitats. The Soundscape Newsletter, 6, 6-10.
[68]	Kuna VM, Nábělek JL (2021) Seismic crustal imaging using fin whale songs. Science, 371, 731-735. DOI PMID
[69]	Ladich F (2014) Fish bioacoustics. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 28, 121-127. DOI PMID
[70]	Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Magrath MJL (2021) A comprehensive overview of technologies for species and habitat monitoring and conservation. BioScience, 71, 1038-1062. DOI PMID
[71]	Laiolo P (2010) The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation. Biological Conservation, 143, 1635-1645. DOI URL
[72]	Lan SC (1958) Songs of birds. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 2, 230-233. (in Chinese)
	[蓝书成 (1958) 鸟类的鸣叫. 动物学杂志, 2, 230-233.]
[73]	Lei FM, Wang AZ, Wang G, Yin ZH (2005) Vocalizations of red-necked snow finch, Pyrgilauda ruficollis on the Tibetan Plateau, China—A syllable taxonomic signal? Folia Zoologica, 54, 135-146.
[74]	Lewis RN, Williams LJ, Gilman RT (2021) The uses and implications of avian vocalizations for conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 35, 50-63. DOI URL
[75]	Li BG, Chen FG, Luo SY, Xie WZ (1993) Major categories of vocal behavior in wild Sichuan golden monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellanae). Acta Theriologica Sinica, 13, 181-187.
[76]	Li FH, Lu YG, Wang HB, Guo YG, Zhang F (2019) Technological progress and development trend of ocean bottom observatory network. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 34, 321-330. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李风华, 路艳国, 王海斌, 郭永刚, 张飞 (2019) 海底观测网的研究进展与发展趋势. 中国科学院院刊, 34, 321-330.]
[77]	Li PX, Yu XF, Chi Q (1989) The preliminary studies on the structure of sound of breeding yellow throated bunting. Wildlife, 52, 47-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李佩珣, 于学锋, 迟清 (1989) 黄喉鹀繁殖期鸣声结构的初步研究. 野生动物, 52, 47-50.]
[78]	Li S, Wei G, Xu N, Cui J, Fei L, Jiang J, Liu J, Wang B (2019) A new species of the Asian music frog genus Nidirana (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae) from Southwestern China. PeerJ, 7, e7157.
[79]	Li SH, Wang D, Wang KX, Taylor EA, Cros E, Shi WJ, Wang ZT, Fang L, Chen YF, Kong FM (2012) Evoked-potential audiogram of an Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin (Sousa chinensis). Journal of Experimental Biology, 215, 3055-3063.
[80]	Li YY, Liu Z, Qi FY, Zhou X, Shi P (2017) Functional effects of a retained ancestral polymorphism in prestin. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 88-92. DOI URL
[81]	Lin TH, Tsao Y (2020) Source separation in ecoacoustics: A roadmap towards versatile soundscape information retrieval. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 6, 236-247. DOI URL
[82]	Liu M, Wei QW, Du H, Fu ZY, Chen QC (2013) Auditory thresholds of Chinese sucker Myxocyprinus asiaticus. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 20, 750-757. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[刘猛, 危起伟, 杜浩, 付子英, 陈其才 (2013) 胭脂鱼听觉阈值研究. 中国水产科学, 20, 750-757.]
[83]	Liu SL, Xie Q, Jiang AW, Goodale E (2022) Investigating how different classes of nest predators respond to the playback of the begging calls of nestling birds. Avian Research, 13, 100044.
[84]	Liu Z, Chen P, Xu DM, Qi FY, Guo YT, Liu Q, Bai J, Zhou X, Shi P (2022) Molecular convergence and transgenic evidence suggest a single origin of laryngeal echolocation in bats. iScience, 25, 104114.
[85]	Liu Z, Qi FY, Xu DM, Zhou X, Shi P (2018) Genomic and functional evidence reveals molecular insights into the origin of echolocation in whales. Science Advances, 4, eaat8821.
[86]	Liu Z, Qi FY, Zhou X, Ren HQ, Shi P (2014) Parallel sites implicate functional convergence of the hearing gene prestin among echolocating mammals. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31, 2415-2424. DOI PMID
[87]	Lomolino MV, Pijanowski BC, Gasc A (2015) The silence of biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 42, 1187-1196. DOI URL
[88]	Lu MM, Zhang GM, Luo JH (2020) Echolocating bats exhibit differential amplitude compensation for noise interference at a sub-call level. Journal of Experimental Biology, 223, jeb225284.
[89]	Lu TC, He FQ, Lu CL (1986) On the call of the Chinese monal (Lophophorus lhuysii). Acta Ecologica Sinica, 6, 87-88. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[卢汰春, 何芬奇, 卢春雷 (1986) 绿尾虹雉叫声的声谱分析. 生态学报, 6, 87-88.]
[90]	Luo CQ, Wei C (2015) Intraspecific sexual mimicry for finding females in a cicada: Males produce ‘female sounds’ to gain reproductive benefit. Animal Behaviour, 102, 69-76. DOI URL
[91]	Luo JH, Lu MM, Wang XD, Wang HM, Moss CF (2022) Doppler shift compensation performance in Hipposideros pratti across experimental paradigms. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 16, 920703.
[92]	Luo JH, Siemers BM, Koselj K (2015) How anthropogenic noise affects foraging. Global Change Biology, 21, 3278-3289. DOI PMID
[93]	Martínez TM, Logue DM (2020) Conservation practices and the formation of vocal dialects in the endangered Puerto Rican parrot, Amazona vittata. Animal Behaviour, 166, 261-271. DOI URL
[94]	McAfee K (1999) Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17, 133-154. DOI URL
[95]	Mellinger DK (2011) Introduction to animal bioacoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 2406.
[96]	Montgomery JC, Radford CA (2017) Marine bioacoustics. Current Biology, 27, R502-R507.
[97]	Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. The American Naturalist, 109, 17-34. DOI URL
[98]	Nowacek DP, Christiansen F, Bejder L, Goldbogen JA, Friedlaender AS (2016) Studying cetacean behaviour: New technological approaches and conservation applications. Animal Behaviour, 120, 235-244. DOI URL
[99]	Obrist MK, Pavan G, Sueur J, Riede K, Llusia D, Marquez R (2010) Bioacoustics approaches in biodiversity inventories. Abc Taxa, 8, 68-99.
[100]	Odom KJ, Araya-Salas M, Morano JL, Ligon RA, Leighton GM, Taff CC, Dalziell AH, Billings AC, Germain RR, Pardo M, de Andrade LG, Hedwig D, Keen SC, Shiu Y, Charif RA, Webster MS, Rice AN (2021) Comparative bioacoustics: A roadmap for quantifying and comparing animal sounds across diverse taxa. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 96, 1135-1159. DOI PMID
[101]	Oestreich WK, Fahlbusch JA, Cade DE, Calambokidis J, Margolina T, Joseph J, Friedlaender AS, McKenna MF, Stimpert AK, Southall BL, Goldbogen JA, Ryan JP (2020) Animal-borne metrics enable acoustic detection of blue whale migration. Current Biology, 30, 4773-4779. DOI URL
[102]	Paihas Y, Capus C, Brown K, Lane D (2013) Benefits of dolphin inspired sonar for underwater object identification. In: In: Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems (eds Lepora NF, Mura A, Krapp HG, Verschure PFMJ, Prescott TJ), pp. 36-46. Heidelberg, Berlin.
[103]	Pang BZ (1960) Songs of birds. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 4, 304-307. (in Chinese)
	[庞秉璋 (1960) 鸟类的效鸣Ⅱ. 动物学杂志, 4, 304-307.]
[104]	Pang BZ (1964) Songs of birds Ⅱ. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 8, 213-215. (in Chinese)
	[庞秉璋 (1964) 鸟类的效鸣Ⅱ. 动物学杂志, 8, 213-215.]
[105]	Parsons MJG, Lin TH, Mooney TA, Erbe C, Juanes F, Lammers M, Li SH, Linke S, Looby A, Nedelec SL, Van Opzeeland I, Radford C, Rice AN, Sayigh L, Stanley J, Urban E, Di Iorio L (2022) Sounding the call for a global library of underwater biological sounds. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 810156.
[106]	Pijanowski BC, Farina A, Gage SH, Dumyahn SL, Krause BL (2011a) What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landscape Ecology, 26, 1213-1232. DOI URL
[107]	Pijanowski BC, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Dumyahn SL, Farina A, Krause BL, Napoletano BM, Gage SH, Pieretti N (2011b) Soundscape ecology: The science of sound in the landscape. BioScience, 61, 203-216. DOI URL
[108]	Popper AN, Dooling RJ (2002) History of animal bioacoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2368.
[109]	Ritts M, Bakker K (2021) Conservation acoustics: Animal sounds, audible natures, cheap nature. Geoforum, 124, 144-155. DOI URL
[110]	Roe P, Eichinski P, Fuller RA, McDonald PG, Schwarzkopf L, Towsey M, Truskinger A, Tucker D, Watson DM (2021) The Australian Acoustic Observatory. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 1802-1808. DOI URL
[111]	Ryan MJ (1988) Coevolution of sender and receiver: Effect on local mate preferecnce in cricket frogs. Science, 240, 1786. PMID
[112]	Ryan MJ, Rand AS (2003) Sexual selection in female perceptual space: How female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals. Evolution, 57, 2608-2618. PMID
[113]	Sanguineti M, Alessi J, Brunoldi M, Cannarile G, Cavalleri O, Cerruti R, Falzoi N, Gaberscek F, Gili C, Gnone G, Grosso D, Guidi C, Mandich A, Melchiorre C, Pesce A, Petrillo M, Taiuti MG, Valettini B, Viano G (2021) An automated passive acoustic monitoring system for real time sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) threat prevention in the Mediterranean Sea. Applied Acoustics, 172, 107650.
[114]	Schafer RM (1977) The Tuning of the World. Knopf, New York.
[115]	Schöner MG, Simon R, Schöner CR (2016) Acoustic communication in plant-animal interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 32, 88-95. DOI PMID
[116]	Senzaki M, Barber JR, Phillips JN, Carter NH, Cooper CB, Ditmer MA, Fristrup KM, McClure CJW, Mennitt DJ, Tyrrell LP, Vukomanovic J, Wilson AA, Francis CD (2020) Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent. Nature, 587, 605-609. DOI URL
[117]	Shen JX (1989) Frequency selectivity of primary auditory neurons in the bushcricket Gampsocleis gratiosa. Acta Acoustica, 6, 415-419. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[沈钧贤 (1989) 螽斯Gampsocleis gratiosa初级听觉神经元的频率选择特性. 声学学报, 6, 415-419.]
[118]	Shen JX (1994) Time parameter coding of acoustic signal of auditory interneurons in cicada. Chinese Science Bulletin, 39, 265-268. (in Chinese)
	[沈钧贤 (1994) 蚱蝉听觉中间神经元对声信号时间参数的编码. 科学通报, 39, 265-268.]
[119]	Shen JX, Xu ZM, Yu ZL, Wang S, Zheng DZ, Fan SC (2011) Ultrasonic frogs show extraordinary sex differences in auditory frequency sensitivity. Nature Communications, 2, 342. DOI URL
[120]	Siemers BM, Schaub A (2011) Hunting at the highway:Traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in acoustic predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1646-1652.
[121]	Simpson SD, Radford AN, Nedelec SL, Ferrari MCO, Chivers DP, McCormick MI, Meekan MG (2016) Anthropogenic noise increases fish mortality by predation. Nature Communications, 7, 10544. DOI PMID
[122]	Slabbekoorn H (2019) Noise pollution. Current Biology, 29, R957-R960.
[123]	Slabbekoorn H, Dooling RJ, Popper AN, Fay RR (2018) Effects of Anthropogenic Noise on Animals. Springer, New York.
[124]	Slabbekoorn H, Peet M (2003) Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature, 424, 267.
[125]	Solé M, Lenoir M, Fontuño JM, Durfort M, van der Schaar M, André M (2016) Evidence of Cnidarians sensitivity to sound after exposure to low frequency noise underwater sources. Scientific Reports, 6, 37979. DOI URL
[126]	Song SJ, Chang Y, Wang DP, Jiang TL, Feng J, Lin AQ (2020) Chronic traffic noise increases food intake and alters gene expression associated with metabolism and disease in bats. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57, 1915-1925. DOI URL
[127]	Stowell D (2022) Computational bioacoustics with deep learning: A review and roadmap. PeerJ, 10, e13152.
[128]	Sueur J, Farina A (2015) Ecoacoustics: The ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound. Biosemiotics, 8, 493-502. DOI URL
[129]	Sueur J, Farina A, Gasc A, Pieretti N, Pavoine S (2014) Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and landscape investigation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 100, 772-781. DOI URL
[130]	Sugai LSM, Llusia D (2019) Bioacoustic time capsules: Using acoustic monitoring to document biodiversity. Ecological Indicators, 99, 149-152. DOI URL
[131]	Sugai LSM, Llusia D, Siqueira T, Silva TSF (2021) Revisiting the drivers of acoustic similarities in tropical anuran assemblages. Ecology, 102, e03380.
[132]	Sugai LSM, Silva TSF, Ribeiro JW, Llusia D (2019) Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: Review and perspectives. BioScience, 69, 15-25. DOI
[133]	Teixeira D, Maron M, van Rensburg BJ (2019) Bioacoustic monitoring of animal vocal behavior for conservation. Conservation Science and Practice, 1, e72.
[134]	Themann CL, Masterson EA (2019) Occupational noise exposure: A review of its effects, epidemiology, and impact with recommendations for reducing its burden. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146, 3879-3905. DOI URL
[135]	Torricelli P, Lugli M, Pavan G (1990) Analysis of sounds produced by male Padogobius martensi (Pisces, Gobiidae) and factors affecting their structural properties. Bioacoustics, 2, 261-275.
[136]	Towsey M, Wimmer J, Williamson I, Roe P (2014a) The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment. Ecological Informatics, 21, 110-119. DOI URL
[137]	Towsey M, Zhang L, Cottman-Fields M, Wimmer J, Zhang J, Roe P (2014b) Visualization of long-duration acoustic recordings of the environment. Procedia Computer Science, 29, 703-712. DOI URL
[138]	Tuia D, Kellenberger B, Beery S, Costelloe BR, Zuffi S, Risse B, Mathis A, Mathis MW, van Langevelde F, Burghardt T, Kays R, Klinck H, Wikelski M, Couzin ID, van Horn G, Crofoot MC, Stewart CV, Berger-Wolf T (2022) Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation. Nature Communications, 13, 792. DOI PMID
[139]	Wale MA, Simpson SD, Radford AN (2013) Noise negatively affects foraging and antipredator behaviour in shore crabs. Animal Behaviour, 86, 111-118 DOI URL
[140]	Walters CL, Freeman R, Collen A, Dietz C, Brock Fenton M, Jones G, Obrist MK, Puechmaille SJ, Sattler T, Siemers BM, Parsons S, Jones KE (2012) A continental-scale tool for acoustic identification of European bats. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 1064-1074. DOI URL
[141]	Wang D, Wang KX, Liu RJ, Chen PX, Chen G, Wang ZF, Lu WX, Yang SZ (1989) A preliminary study of the acoustic behavior and auditory sensitivity of Lipotes vexillifer. Natural Science Journal of Xiangtan University, 11, 116-121. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王丁, 王克雄, 刘仁俊, 陈佩薰, 谌刚, 王治藩, 卢文祥, 杨叔子 (1989) 白鳍豚声行为及听觉灵敏度的初步研究. 湘潭大学自然科学学报, 11,116-121.]
[142]	Wang HM, Zhou YX, Li HH, Moss CF, Li XX, Luo JH (2022) Sensory error drives fine motor adjustment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 119, e2201275119.
[143]	Wang TL, Li HD, Cui JG, Zhai XF, Shi HT, Wang JC (2019) Auditory brainstem responses in the red-eared slider Trachemys scripta elegans (Testudoformes: Emydidae) reveal sexually dimorphic hearing sensitivity. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 205, 847-854. DOI URL
[144]	Wang WW, Gao HM, Li CR, Deng YC, Zhou DY, Li YQ, Zhou WY, Luo B, Liang HY, Liu WQ, Wu P, Jing W, Feng J (2022) Airport noise disturbs foraging behavior of Japanese pipistrelle bats. Ecology and Evolution, 12, e8976.
[145]	Wang ZT, Akamatsu T, Mei ZG, Dong LJ, Imaizumi T, Wang KX, Wang D (2015) Frequent and prolonged nocturnal occupation of port areas by Yangtze finless porpoises (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis): Forced choice for feeding? Integrative Zoology, 10, 122-132. DOI PMID
[146]	Wang ZT, Akamatsu T, Nowacek DP, Yuan J, Zhou L, Lei PY, Li J, Duan PX, Wang KX, Wang D (2019) Soundscape of an Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin (Sousa chinensis) hotspot before windfarm construction in the Pearl River Estuary, China: Do dolphin engage in noise avoidance and passive eavesdropping behavior? Marine Pollution Bulletin, 140, 509-522. DOI URL
[147]	Wang ZT, Duan PX, Akamatsu T, Chen YW, An X, Yuan J, Lei PY, Li J, Zhou L, Liu MC, Yang YN, Fan F, Wang KX, Wang D (2021a) Riverside underwater noise pollution threaten porpoises and fish along the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 226, 112860.
[148]	Wang ZT, Duan PX, Chen M, Mei ZG, Sun XD, Nong ZW, Liu MH, Akamatsu T, Wang KX, Wang D (2022) Vocalization of bryde’s whales (Balaenoptera edeni) in the Beibu Gulf, China. Marine Mammal Science, 38, 1118-1139. DOI URL
[149]	Wang ZT, Duan PX, Wang KX, Wang D (2021b) Noise pollution disrupts freshwater cetaceans. Science, 374, 1332-1333.
[150]	Wang ZT, Fang L, Shi WJ, Wang KX, Wang D (2013) Whistle characteristics of free-ranging Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis) in Sanniang Bay, China. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133, 2479-2489. DOI URL
[151]	Wang ZT, Nowacek DP, Akamatsu T, Wang KX, Liu JC, Duan GQ, Cao HJ, Wang D (2017) Diversity of fish sound types in the Pearl River Estuary, China. PeerJ, 5, e3924.
[152]	WHO World Health Organization (2005) Occupancy and Community Noise, WHO-OMS. http://www.who.int.inffs/ en/fact.html.
[153]	Xiang J, Zou QL, Du H, Wang CY, Wei QW (2022) Threshold of the Juvenile Acipenser dabryanus Dumeril. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 46, 1564-1568. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[项杰, 邹巧林, 杜浩, 王成友, 危起伟 (2022) 长江鲟幼鱼的听觉阈值研究. 水生生物学报, 46, 1564-1568.]
[154]	Xie J, Colonna JG, Zhang JL (2021) Bioacoustic signal denoising: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54, 3575-3597. DOI URL
[155]	Xie J, Hu K, Zhu MY, Guo Y (2020) Data-driven analysis of global research trends in bioacoustics and ecoacoustics from 1991 to 2018. Ecological Informatics, 57, 101068.
[156]	Xie J, Towsey M, Zhang JL, Roe P (2016) Adaptive frequency scaled wavelet packet decomposition for frog call classification. Ecological Informatics, 32, 134-144. DOI URL
[157]	Xie J, Towsey M, Zhang JL, Roe P (2018) Frog call classification: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 49, 375-391. DOI URL
[158]	Xing BB, Wang ZY, Zhang GS, Zhuang X, Yin LM, Wang YN, Li HQ, Liu J, Liu HC, Xu LX (2018) Study on hearing capacities of Paralichthys olivaceus using an ECG. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 25, 467-474. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[邢彬彬, 王振宇, 张国胜, 庄鑫, 殷雷明, 王羿宁, 李泓泉, 刘景, 刘宏超, 许柳雄 (2018) 基于心电图法(ECG)的牙鲆听觉特性研究. 中国水产科学, 25, 467-474.]
[159]	Xu F, Cui JG, Song J, Brauth SE, Tang YZ (2012) Male competition strategies change when information concerning female receptivity is available. Behavioral Ecology, 23, 307-312. DOI URL
[160]	Yang LL, Xu XM, Zhang PJ, Han JB, Li B, Berggren P (2017) Classification of underwater vocalizations of wild spotted seals (Phoca largha) in Liaodong Bay, China. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141, 2256-2262. DOI URL
[161]	Zaharna M, Guilleminault C (2010) Sleep, noise and health: Review. Noise & Health, 12, 64-69.
[162]	Zhang LB, Liang B, Parsons S, Wei L, Zhang S (2007) Morphology, echolocation and foraging behaviour in two sympatric sibling species of bat (Tylonycteris pachypus and Tylonycteris robustula)(Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Zoology, 271, 344-351. DOI URL
[163]	Zhang Y, Hou R, Guo L, Liu P, Zhang S, Chen P, Zhao Q (2021) Automatically distinguishing adult from young giant pandas based on their call. In: Chinese Conference on Biometric Recognition (eds Feng J, Zhang J, Liu M, Fang Y), pp. 92-101. Springer, Cham.
[164]	Zhang Y, Tao C, Zhang Q, Wang KX (2021) Status and future development trends for bioacoustics. In: In: Status and Future Development Trends for Acoustics Discipline (eds Cheng JC, Li XD, Yang J), pp, 375-388. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[张宇, 陶超, 庄桥, 王克雄 (2021) 生物声学研究现状以及未来发展趋势. 见: 声学学科现状以及未来发展趋势(程建春, 李晓东, 杨军主编), 375-388页. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[165]	Zhao LH, Wang JC, Zhang HD, Wang TL, Yang Y, Tang YZ, Halfwerk W, Cui JG (2022) Parasite defensive limb movements enhance acoustic signal attraction in male little torrent frogs. eLife, 11, e76083.
[166]	Zhao X, Sun S, Shi W, Sun X, Zhang Y, Zhu L, Sui Q, Xia B, Qu K, Chen B, Liu G (2021) Mussel byssal attachment weakened by anthropogenic noise. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 828019.
[167]	Zhao Z, Xu ZY, Bellisario K, Zeng RW, Li N, Zhou WY, Pijanowski BC (2019) How well do acoustic indices measure biodiversity? Computational experiments to determine effect of sound unit shape, vocalization intensity, and frequency of vocalization occurrence on performance of acoustic indices. Ecological Indicators, 107, 105588.
[168]	Zheng GM, Song J, Zhang ZW, Zhang YY, Guo DS (2000) A new species of Flycather (Ficedula) fromchina (Aves: Passeriformes: Muscicapidae). Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 36, 405-409, 427.
[169]	Zhong EZ, Guan ZH, Zhou XC, Zhao YJ, Li H, Tan SB, Hu KR (2021) Application of passive acoustic monitoring technology in the monitoring of western black crested gibbons. Biodiversity Science, 29, 109-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[钟恩主, 管振华, 周兴策, 赵友杰, 李函, 谭绍斌, 胡坤融 (2021) 被动声学监测技术在西黑冠长臂猿监测中的应用. 生物多样性, 29, 109-117.]
[170]	Zhu BC, Yang Y, Zhou Y, Deng K, Wang TL, Wang JC, Tang YZ, Ryan MJ, Cui JG (2022a) Multisensory integration facilitates perceptual restoration of an interrupted call in a species of frog. Behavioral Ecology, 33, 876-883. DOI URL
[171]	Zhu BC, Zhang HD, Chen QH, He QL, Zhao XM, Sun XQ, Wang TL, Wang JC, Cui JG (2022b) Noise affects mate choice based on visual information via cross-sensory interference. Environmental Pollution, 308, 119680.
[172]	Zhu BC, Zhou Y, Yang Y, Deng K, Wang TL, Wang JC, Tang YZ, Ryan MJ, Cui JG (2021) Multisensory modalities increase working memory for mating signals in a treefrog. Journal of Animal Ecology, 90, 1455-1465. DOI PMID
[173]	Zhu J, Meng ZB (1987) On the vocal behavior during the estrous period of the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Acta Zoologica Sinica, 33, 285-292. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[朱靖, 孟智斌 (1987) 大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)发情期叫声及其行为意义. 动物学报, 33, 285-292.]
[174]	Znidersic E, Watson DM (2022) Acoustic restoration: Using soundscapes to benchmark and fast-track recovery of ecological communities. Ecology Letters, 25, 1597-1603. DOI PMID

现代生物声学的学科发展趋势及中国机遇

Interdisciplinary development trends of contemporary bioacoustics and the opportunities for China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 174

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙翊斐, 王士政, 冯佳伟, 王天明. 东北虎豹国家公园森林声景的昼夜和季节变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22523-.
[2]	王士政, 孙翊斐, 李珍珍, 舒越, 冯佳伟, 王天明. 鸟类迁徙对图们江下游湿地声景时间格局的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22337-.
[3]	马海港, 范鹏来. 被动声学监测技术在陆生哺乳动物研究中的应用、进展和展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22374-.
[4]	吴科毅, 阮文达, 周棣锋, 陈庆春, 张承云, 潘新园, 余上, 刘阳, 肖荣波. 基于音节聚类分析的被动声学监测技术及其在鸟类监测中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22370-.
[5]	钟恩主, 管振华, 周兴策, 赵友杰, 李函, 谭绍斌, 胡坤融. 被动声学监测技术在西黑冠长臂猿监测中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 109-117.