滇中半湿润常绿阔叶林木本植物的功能特征和功能多样性及其影响因子

doi:10.17520/biods.2023215

生物多样性 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 23215. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023215

• 半湿润常绿阔叶林专题 • 上一篇下一篇

滇中半湿润常绿阔叶林木本植物的功能特征和功能多样性及其影响因子

罗彩访¹, 杨涛¹, 张秋雨¹, 王馨培², 沈泽昊¹^,²^,^*()

1.云南大学生态与环境学院, 昆明 650091
2.北京大学城市与环境学院, 北京大学地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室, 北京 100871

收稿日期:2023-06-25 接受日期:2023-11-07 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-11-21
通讯作者: * E-mail: shzh@urban.pku.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41971228);云南省科技厅-云南大学双一流学科建设重大专项(2018FY001-002);云南省基础研究计划重大项目课题(202101BC07 0002)

Plant functional traits, community functional diversity and their environmental determinants of the semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forest in the Central Yunnan Plateau

Caifang Luo¹, Tao Yang¹, Qiuyu Zhang¹, Xinpei Wang², Zehao Shen¹^,²^,^*()

1 School of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091
2 Key Laboratory of MOE for Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871s

Received:2023-06-25 Accepted:2023-11-07 Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-11-21
Contact: * E-mail: shzh@urban.pku.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

半湿润常绿阔叶林是中国常绿阔叶林西部中亚热带类型的代表, 为了解其群落的功能多样性, 本研究对云南滇中地区金光寺、鸡足山、雕翎山、筇竹寺和珠江源5个半湿润常绿阔叶林分布点进行群落调查和木本植物性状测定, 分析不同样地和群落类型的植物功能特征和群落功能多样性, 探究滇中半湿润常绿阔叶林木本植物之间的差异及其环境影响因素。结果表明: (1)不同样地和不同群落类型下功能性状的群落加权平均值大致相当; 灌木层的比叶面积平均值高于乔木层; 乔木层、灌木层的木材平均密度无显著差异(约0.5 g/cm³); (2)基于最大株高、比叶面积和木材密度计算的半湿润常绿阔叶林乔木层功能多样性在不同样地间差异显著(P < 0.05), 其中鸡足山和雕翎山的乔木层功能丰富度、均匀度和冗余度较高, 群落更稳定。不同群落类型所占的功能空间大小不同, 但群落内物种功能分异度、均匀度和冗余度相似。此外, 灌木层的物种丰富度高于乔木层, 功能丰富度却相对较低; (3)功能丰富度和功能冗余度都与物种丰富度显著正相关(P < 0.05), 与其他多样性指数关系不显著。环境因子中气候和土壤因素共同解释群落乔木层、灌木层功能性状和功能多样性的60%以上变异性, 人类活动也会对植物群落功能多样性造成一定影响。本研究揭示了半湿润常绿阔叶林不同群落类型和层次的植物功能性状差异及其区域变化, 为该植被类型的生物多样性和生态系统功能保护与恢复提供科学依据。

关键词: 半湿润常绿阔叶林, 功能性状, 功能多样性, 环境解释

Abstract

Aims: Semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forest (SEBF) represents a distinct sub-type of evergreen broad-leaved forests within the subtropical region of western China. Despite their ecological significance, the functional diversity of SEBFs remains in adequately understood. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of plant traits and functional diversity within SEBFs and elucidate the environmental factors influencing their variations.

Methods: This research was conducted across the expanse of the Central Yunnan Plateau, the primary natural habitat for SEBFs. We conducted surveys within five well-protected SEBF sites, namely Jinguangsi (JGS), Jizu Mountains (JZS), Diaoling Mountains (DLS), Qiongzhusi (QZS), and Zhujiangyuan (ZJY). A total of 29 plots measuring 20 m × 20 m were sampled. Key plant traits including the maximum height (H_max), specific leaf area (SLA), and wood density, were recorded for collected samples. Functional diversity indices such as functional richness (FRic), functional divergence (FDiv), functional evenness (FEve), and functional redundancy (Rstar) were calculated based on these traits. Additionally, life-form spectrums and community-weighted mean trait values (CWM) were assessed for different sample sites and community types. Environmental factor analysis, using variance partitioning, was employed to gauge the impact of various ecological factors on the variations in functional diversity within SEBFs.

Results: Within the semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests (SEBFs) of the Central Yunnan Plateau, the CWM of key traits, namely H_max, SLA and wood density, exhibited no significant differences among various sample sites and community types. The shrub layer demonstrated higher CWM_SLA values compared to the tree layer, while their CWM_wood_density remained consistent at 0.5 g/cm³. In terms of diversity, both species diversity and functional diversity varied between the tree layer and shrub layer. Notably, JZS and DLS exhibited the highest values for FRic, FEve, and Rstar, indicating greater resilience and stability in these two sample sites. However, different community types of SEBFs, based on various dominant species, displayed similar FDiv, FEve, and Rstar values, differing only in FRic. FRic and Rstar were both significantly positively correlated with species richness (P < 0.05), while their relationships with other functional diversity indices were not significant. Factor analysis revealed that climate and soil nutrient contributed more than 60% of variances in CWM and functional diversity within SBEFs. Additionally, human activities emerged as influential factors in shaping the functional diversity of these forest communities.

Conclusion: Our results shed light on the characteristics of CWM values and functional diversity within the SEBFs, particularly in the context of tree layer and shrub layer. We have observed distinct spatial variations across different sample sites. Interestingly, despite the existence of different community types based on various dominant species, these communities occupy different functional niches yet exhibit a remarkable degree of functional convergence in terms of directional divergence, evenness, and redundancy. These findings provide valuable insights into the functional diversity of SEBFs, which, in turn, can inform and enhance efforts related to forest conservation and biodiversity restoration.

Key words: semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forest, community-weighted mean trait values, community functional diversity, environmental determinants

罗彩访, 杨涛, 张秋雨, 王馨培, 沈泽昊 (2023) 滇中半湿润常绿阔叶林木本植物的功能特征和功能多样性及其影响因子. 生物多样性, 31, 23215. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023215.

Caifang Luo, Tao Yang, Qiuyu Zhang, Xinpei Wang, Zehao Shen (2023) Plant functional traits, community functional diversity and their environmental determinants of the semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forest in the Central Yunnan Plateau. Biodiversity Science, 31, 23215. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023215.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2023215

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2023/V31/I11/23215

图/表 9

图1 云南省半湿润常绿阔叶林5个调查样地的地理位置及样地照片

Fig. 1 Geographic positions and pictures of the five sampling sites of semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests in Yunnan

表1 云南省半湿润常绿阔叶林不同样地的环境因子

Table 1 The environmental factors of semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests among different sampling sites in Yunnan

因子 Factors	变量 Variables	金光寺 JGS	鸡足山 JZS	雕翎山 DLS	筇竹寺 QZS	珠江源 ZJY
气候 Climate	年均温 MAT (℃)	11.3	14.7	14.1	15.1	12.5
	年均降水量 MAP (mm)	1,309.3	1,174.0	1,000.2	1,210.5	1,180.0
	湿季均温 MTWQ (℃)	15.4	18.4	18.4	19.5	17.9
	湿季降水量 MPWQ (mm)	636.6	672.8	573.6	692.4	612.8
	干季均温 MTDQ (℃)	5.24	8.71	8.26	9.15	5.95
	干季降水量 MPDQ (mm)	77.8	41.9	40.7	56.3	66.5
	温度季节性 TempS	423.0	422.7	415.5	413.2	465.4
	降水季节性 PrecipS	70.2	90.1	87.8	84.8	79.6
地形 Topography	海拔 Elev (m)	2,504	2,442	2,314	2,197	2,332
土壤 Soil	酸碱度 pH	4.09	5.23	4.70	4.77	3.97
土壤 Soil	全氮 TN (%)	0.31	0.63	0.33	0.57	0.31
	有机碳 OC (mg/g)	9.47	11.2	6.12	5.63	5.04
人类活动 Human activity	距道路最近距离 Dist_road (km)	4.26	0.37	1.47	0.28	0.16
人类活动 Human activity	距居民点最近距离 Dist_resident_. (km)	2.50	1.56	1.85	1.39	1.14
群落类型 Community types		元江栲林 COF	元江栲林 COF 高山栲林 CDF2 黄毛青冈林 CDF	元江栲林 COF 高山栲林 CDF2 白穗柯林 LCF 多变柯林 LVF	元江栲林 COF	元江栲林 COF 灰背栎林 QSF

图2 半湿润常绿阔叶林木本植物中不同生长型物种(灌木、具革质叶片木本植物和具全缘叶片木本植物)重要值占比的比较。(a) (b) (c)为不同样地之间的比较; (d) (e) (f)为不同群落类型之间的比较。不同字母表示差异显著(P < 0.05)。缩写含义见表1。

Fig. 2 Relative proportion of importance values of different growth-form woody species, i.e. shrub species, woody species with leathery leaves, and woody species with entire leaves, within semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests. (a), (b), (c) show the multiple comparisons among different sampling sites. (d) (e) (f) show the multiple comparisons among different community types. Different letters denote significant difference of multiple comparisons (P < 0.05). The meanings of abbreviations see Table 1.

图3 半湿润常绿阔叶林植物功能性状(最大株高、比叶面积和木材密度)的群落加权平均值(平均值 ± 标准误差)比较。(a) (b) (c)为不同样地之间的比较; (d) (e) (f)为不同群落类型之间的比较。不同字母表示差异显著(P < 0.05)。缩写含义见表1。

Fig. 3 Community-weighted mean trait values (CWM, mean ± SE) of the maximum height (Hmax), specific leaf area (SLA), and wood density within semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests. (a) (b) (c) show the multiple comparisons among different sampling sites. (d) (e) (f) show the multiple comparisons among different community types. Different letters denote significant difference (P < 0.05). The meanings of abbreviations see Table 1.

表2 半湿润常绿阔叶林群落乔木层和灌木层之间功能性状、多样性关系

Table 2 Correlations of community-weighted mean trait values (CWM), species diversity and functional diversity between tree layer and shrub layer within semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests. Spearman correlation coefficients (r) showed in this table.

功能性状 CWM	r	物种多样性 Species diversity	r	功能多样性 Functional diversity	r
最大株高 Maximum height (Hmax)	-0.07	物种丰富度 Species richness (SR)	0.76***	功能丰富度 Functional richness (FRic)	0.65***
比叶面积 Specific leaf area (SLA)	-0.17			功能分异度 Functional divergence (FDiv)	0.04
木材密度 Wood density	0.25			功能均匀度 Functional evenness (FEve)	-0.12
				功能冗余度 Functional redundancy (Rstar)	0.11

表3 半湿润常绿阔叶林不同群落类型间多样性差异比较(Wilcoxon秩和检验)。不同字母表示不同群落类型间差异显著(P < 0.05)。

Table 3 Comparison of diversity among different plant community types within semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests based on Wilcoxon rank sum test. Different letters denote statistical difference of multiple comparisons (P < 0.05).

群落类型 Community types	样方数 No. of plots	物种丰富度 SR		功能丰富度 FRic		功能分异度 FDiv		功能均匀度 FEve		功能冗余度 Rstar
群落类型 Community types	样方数 No. of plots	乔木层 Tree layer	灌木层 Shrub layer	乔木层 Tree layer	灌木层 Shrub layer	乔木层 Tree layer	灌木层 Shrub layer	乔木层 Tree layer	灌木层 Shrub layer	乔木层 Tree layer	灌木层 Shrub layer
灰背栎林 QSF	2	9.3^ab	17.0^ab	7.8^a	5.6^ab	0.86^a	0.71^a	0.61^a	0.62^ab	0.69^a	0.72^ab
黄毛青冈林 CDF	2	13.5^a	12.5^ab	7.9^a	4.2^ab	0.90^a	0.66^a	0.61^a	0.52^ab	0.76^a	0.63^ab
高山栲林 CDF2	4	6.5^b	22.0^a	5.9^ab	7.3^a	0.73^a	0.78^a	0.55^a	0.72^a	0.45^a	0.87^a
白穗柯林 LCF	3	7.5^ab	12.3^ab	7.5^a	3.0^b	0.8^a	0.58^a	0.58^a	0.49^ab	0.63^a	0.58^ab
多变柯林 LVF	2	8.3^ab	10.1^b	7.5^a	2.2^b	0.81^a	0.55^a	0.59^a	0.29^b	0.66^a	0.47^b
元江栲林 COF	16	4.8^b	22.0^a	3.0^b	7.1^a	0.72^a	0.72^a	0.51^a	0.64^ab	0.41^a	0.73^ab

表4 半湿润常绿阔叶林不同样地间群落多样性差异比较(Wilcoxon秩和检验)。不同字母表示不同样地间差异显著(P < 0.05)。

Table 4 Comparison of diversity among different sampling sites within semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests based on Wilcoxon rank sum test. Different letters denote statistical difference among different sites (P < 0.05).

样地 Sites	样方数 No. of plots	物种丰富度 SR		功能丰富度 FRic		功能分异度 FDiv		功能均匀度 FEve		功能冗余度 Rstar
样地 Sites	样方数 No. of plots	乔木层 Tree layer	灌木层 Shrub layer	乔木层 Tree layer	灌木层 Shrub layer	乔木层 Tree layer	灌木层 Shrub layer	乔木层 Tree layer	灌木层 Shrub layer	乔木层 Tree layer	灌木层 Shrub layer
金光寺 JGS	6	2.67^c	17.38^a	0.49^c	9.47^a	0.59^a	0.69^a	0.51^b	0.74^a	0.19^b	0.79^a
鸡足山 JZS	8	10.14^a	10.33^ab	6.93^a	3.80^b	0.81^a	0.66^a	0.83^a	0.55^ab	0.69^a	0.71^a
雕翎山 DLS	7	8.38^ab	7.00^b	6.82^a	2.11^b	0.81^a	0.48^a	0.63^ab	0.47^b	0.64^a	0.33^b
筇竹寺 QZS	2	5.67^bc	16.57^a	4.74^ab	4.64^ab	0.79^a	0.67^a	0.58^b	0.63^ab	0.41^b	0.75^a
珠江源 ZJY	6	3.00^c	10.00^ab	1.74^bc	2.72^b	0.71^a	0.65^a	0.56^b	0.49^ab	0.37^b	0.61^a

表5 半湿润常绿阔叶林群落多样性指数的相关性矩阵(Spearman相关性分析)

Table 5 Correlations among several diversity indices of semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests (Spearman correlation analysis)

	多样性指数 Diversity index	乔木层功能多样性 FD of tree layer				灌木层功能多样性 FD of shrub layer
	多样性指数 Diversity index	功能丰富度 FRic	功能分异度 FDiv	功能均匀度 FEve	功能冗余度 Rstar	功能丰富度 FRic	功能分异度 FDiv	功能均匀度 FEve	功能冗余度 Rstar
物种多样性 Species diversity	物种丰富度 SR	0.68***	-0.08	-0.30	0.59**	0.77***	0.10	-0.31	0.60**
功能多样性 Functional diversity (FD)	功能丰富度 FRic	1				1
	功能分异度 FDiv	-0.13	1			0.19	1
	功能均匀度 FEve	-0.34	0.18	1		-0.23	0.36	1
	功能冗余度 Rstar	0.45**	-0.16	-0.23	1	0.40*	0.29	-0.002	1

图4 不同环境因素对半湿润常绿阔叶乔木层(a)和灌木层(b)群落功能性状加权平均值、物种丰富度和功能多样性的贡献。解释量粗体表征随机效应(样地)显著。缩写含义详见图3和表2。

Fig. 4 Contributions of different environmental factors in the CWM of the functional traits, species richness, and functional diversity of tree layer (a) and shrub layer (b) of semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests. Different colors indicate different environmental factors, including climate, topography, soil, and human activity. Bold letters of R2 represent the significant effect of random factor (sampling sites). The meanings of abbreviations are shown in Fig. 3 and Table 2.

参考文献 65

[1]	Adeleye MA, Haberle SG, Gallagher R, Andrew SC, Herbert A (2023) Changing plant functional diversity over the last 12,000 years provides perspectives for tracking future changes in vegetation communities. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 7, 224-235.
[2]	Bongers FJ, Schmid B, Bruelheide H, Bongers F, Li S, von Oheimb G, Li Y, Cheng AP, Ma KP, Liu XJ (2021) Functional diversity effects on productivity increase with age in a forest biodiversity experiment. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5, 1594-1603.
[3]	Carreño-Rocabado G, Peña-Claros M, Bongers F, Alarcón A, Licona JC, Poorter L (2012) Effects of disturbance intensity on species and functional diversity in a tropical forest. Journal of Ecology, 100, 1453-1463. DOI URL
[4]	Chen LF, Dou Q, Zhang ZM, Shen ZH (2019) Moisture content variations in soil and plant of post-fire regenerating forests in Central Yunnan Plateau, Southwest China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29, 1179-1192. DOI
[5]	Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 343-366. DOI URL
[6]	Delectis Florae Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Agendae Academicae Sinicae Edita (1959-2004) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (Tomus 1-80). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会 (1959- 2004) 中国植物志(第1-80卷). 科学出版社, 北京.]
[7]	Dı́az S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la différence: Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 646-655. DOI URL
[8]	Ding J, Wu Q, Yan H, Zhang SR (2011) Effects of topographic variations and soil characteristics on plant functional traits in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest. Biodiversity Science, 19, 158-167. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[丁佳, 吴茜, 闫慧, 张守仁 (2011) 地形和土壤特性对亚热带常绿阔叶林内植物功能性状的影响. 生物多样性, 19, 158-167.] DOI
[9]	Echeverría-Londoño S, Enquist BJ, Neves DM, Violle C, Boyle B, Kraft NJB, Maitner BS, McGill B, Peet RK, Sandel B, Smith SA, Svenning JC, Wiser SK, Kerkhoff AJ (2018) Plant functional diversity and the biogeography of biomes in North and South America. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 219. DOI URL
[10]	E-Vojtkó A, de Bello F, Lososová Z, Götzenberger L (2023) Phylogenetic diversity is a weak proxy for functional diversity but they are complementary in explaining community assembly patterns in temperate vegetation. Journal of Ecology, 111, 2218-2230. DOI URL
[11]	Felipe DM (2009) Una herramienta de analisis estadistico para la investigacion agricola. PhD dissertation. Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria (UNI-PERU), Lima.
[12]	Feng C, He XB, Zhao CX, Li J, Kang B (2019) Functional diversity of fishes in the Minjiang Estuary, southeast China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 30, 3589-3595. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[冯晨, 何雄波, 招春旭, 李军, 康斌 (2019) 闽江口鱼类功能多样性. 应用生态学报, 30, 3589-3595.] DOI
[13]	Fu JY, Zhang Q, Su WH (2022) A preliminary study on construction mechanism of vertical structure in Castanopsis orthacantha community. Guihaia, 42, 1040-1048. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[付靖媛, 张谦, 苏文华 (2022) 元江锥群落垂直结构的构建机制初探. 广西植物, 42, 1040-1048.]
[14]	Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, Navas ML, Roumet C, Debussche M, Laurent G, Blanchard A, Aubry D, Bellmann A, Neill C, Toussaint JP (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology, 85, 2630-2637. DOI URL
[15]	Götmark F, Götmark E, Jensen AM (2016) Why be a shrub? A basic model and hypotheses for the adaptive values of a common growth form. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1095. DOI PMID
[16]	Guan SM, Zheng XX, Wu YH, Li YL, Yang GM, Yang YH, Wang WY, Huang LJ (2021) Species diversity and functional diversity of primary vegetation on the coast of Pingtan Island. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Sciences), 41, 71-78. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[管诗敏, 郑心炫, 吴雅华, 李岩林, 杨桂梅, 杨钰华, 王伟耀, 黄柳菁 (2021) 平潭岛海岸自然植被物种和功能多样性特征. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 41, 71-78.]
[17]	Gui XJ, Lian JY, Zhang RY, Li YP, Shen H, Ni YL, Ye WH (2019) Vertical structure and its biodiversity in a subtropical evergreen broadleaved forest at Dinghushan in Guangdong Province, China. Biodiversity Science, 27, 619-629. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[桂旭君, 练琚愉, 张入匀, 李艳朋, 沈浩, 倪云龙, 叶万辉 (2019) 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林群落垂直结构及其物种多样性特征. 生物多样性, 27, 619-629.] DOI
[18]	Guo LQ, Wang QH, Zhou HC, Yang B (1999) Main forest types in Central Yunnan Plateau and transmutation tendency. Yunnan Forestry Science and Technology, (1), 2-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郭立群, 王庆华, 周洪昌, 杨斌 (1999) 滇中高原区主要森林类型及其演变趋势. 云南林业科技, (1), 2-11.]
[19]	Han J, Shen ZH, Li YY, Luo CF, Xu Q, Yang K, Zhang ZM (2018) Beta diversity patterns of post-fire forests in Central Yunnan Plateau, southwest China: Disturbances intensify the priority effect in the community assembly. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1000. DOI PMID
[20]	Huang LJ, Yu YM, An XF, Yu LL, Xue YG (2022) Leaf functional traits, species diversity and functional diversity of plant community in Tiankeng forests. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42, 10264-10275. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[黄林娟, 于燕妹, 安小菲, 余林兰, 薛跃规 (2022) 天坑森林植物群落叶功能性状、物种多样性和功能多样性特征. 生态学报, 42, 10264-10275.]
[21]	Jiang XL, Zhang WG (2010) Functional diversity and its research method. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 2766-2773. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[江小雷, 张卫国 (2010) 功能多样性及其研究方法. 生态学报, 30, 2766-2773.]
[22]	Jin ZZ (1979) The types and characteristics of evergreen broad-leaved forests in Yunnan. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 1, 90-105. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[金振洲 (1979) 云南常绿阔叶林的类型和特征. 云南植物研究, 1, 90-105.]
[23]	Jin ZZ, Peng J (1998) Vegetation of Kunming. Yunnan Science and Technology Press, Kunming. (in Chinese)
	[金振洲, 彭鉴 (1998) 昆明植被. 云南科学技术出版社, 昆明.]
[24]	Kattge J, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice IC, Leadley P, Bönisch G, Garnier E, Westoby M, Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cornelissen JHC, Violle C, Harrison SP, van Bodegom PM, Reichstein M, Enquist BJ, Soudzilovskaia NA, Ackerly DD, Anand M, Atkin O, Bahn M, Baker TR, Baldocchi D, Bekker R, Blanco CC, Blonder B, Bond WJ, Bradstock R, Bunker DE, Casanoves F, Cavender-Bares J, Chambers JQ, Chapin III FS, Chave J, Coomes D, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Dobrin BH, Duarte L, Durka W, Elser J, Esser G, Estiarte M, Fagan WF, Fang J, Fernández-Méndez F, Fidelis A, Finegan B, Flores O, Ford H, Frank D, Freschet GT, Fyllas NM, Gallagher RV, Green WA, Gutierrez AG, Hickler T, Higgins SI, Hodgson JG, Jalili A, Jansen S, Joly CA, Kerkhoff AJ, Kirkup D, Kitajima K, Kleyer M, Klotz S, Knops JMH, Kramer K, Kühn I, Kurokawa H, Laughlin D, Lee TD, Leishman M, Lens F, Lenz T, Lewis SL, Lloyd J, Llusià J, Louault F, Ma S, Mahecha MD, Manning P, Massad T, Medlyn BE, Messier J, Moles AT, Müller SC, Nadrowski K, Naeem S, Niinemets Ü, Nöllert S, Nüske A, Ogaya R, Oleksyn J, Onipchenko VG, Onoda Y, Ordoñez J, Overbeck G, Ozinga WA, Patiño S, Paula S, Pausas JG, Peñuelas J, Phillips OL, Pillar V, Poorter H, Poorter L, Poschlod P, Prinzing A, Proulx R, Rammig A, Reinsch S, Reu B, Sack L, Salgado-Negret B, Sardans J, Shiodera S, Shipley B, Siefert A, Sosinski E, Soussana JF, Swaine E, Swenson N, Thompson K, Thornton P, Waldram M, Weiher E, White M, White S, Wright SJ, Yguel B, Zaehle S, Zanne AE, Wirth C (2011) TRY—A global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology, 17, 2905-2935.
[25]	Kraft NJB, Valencia R, Ackerly DD (2008) Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science, 322, 580-582. DOI PMID
[26]	Kunming Insitute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (1977-2006) Flora of Yunnan. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[中国科学院昆明植物研究所 (1977-2006) 云南植物志. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[27]	Lai JS, Zou Y, Zhang S, Zhang XG, Mao LF (2022) glmm.hp: An R package for computing individual effect of predictors in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of Plant Ecology, 15, 1302-1307. DOI
[28]	Laliberté E, Legendre P (2010) A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology, 91, 299-305. PMID
[29]	Lavorel S, Grigulis K, McIntyre S, Williams NSG, Garden D, Dorrough J, Berman S, Quétier F, Thébault A, Bonis A (2008) Assessing functional diversity in the field—Methodology matters! Functional Ecology, 22, 134-147.
[30]	Lei LJ, Kong DL, Li XM, Zhou ZX, Li GY (2016) Plant functional traits, functional diversity, and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and perspectives. Biodiversity Science, 24, 922-931. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[雷羚洁, 孔德良, 李晓明, 周振兴, 李国勇 (2016) 植物功能性状、功能多样性与生态系统功能: 进展与展望. 生物多样性, 24, 922-931.] DOI
[31]	Li L, Wen ZF, Wei SG, Lian JY, Ye WH (2022) Functional diversity and its influencing factors in a subtropical forest community in China. Forests, 13, 966. DOI URL
[32]	Li YP, Ni YL, Xu H, Lian JY, Ye WH (2021) Relationship between variation of plant functional traits and individual growth at different vertical layers in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest of Dinghushan. Biodiversity Science, 29, 1186-1197. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[李艳朋, 倪云龙, 许涵, 练琚愉, 叶万辉 (2021) 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林植物功能性状变异与不同垂直层次个体生长的关联. 生物多样性, 29, 1186-1197.] DOI
[33]	Li ZM, Sun H (1998) The architecture of leaves from the dominant and common species of semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forest occurring in Centre Yunnan. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 20, 49-57. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李志敏, 孙航 (1998) 滇中半湿润常绿阔叶林主要优势及常见种叶形态结构特征. 云南植物研究, 20, 49-57.]
[34]	Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: The primary components of functional diversity. Oikos, 111, 112-118. DOI URL
[35]	Pavoine S, Ricotta C (2019) A simple translation from indices of species diversity to indices of phylogenetic diversity. Ecological Indicators, 101, 552-561. DOI URL
[36]	Pinheiro J, Bates D, R Core Team (2023) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-163. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. (accessed on 2023-11-10)
[37]	Rahayu S, Pambudi S, Permadi D, Tata HL, Martini E, Rasnovi S, Nuroniah HS, Kindt R, Nugraha M, Dewi S, van Noordwijk M (2022) Functional trait profiles and diversity of trees regenerating in disturbed tropical forests and agroforests in Indonesia. Forest Ecosystems, 9, 100030. DOI URL
[38]	Rahmanian S, Hejda M, Ejtehadi H, Farzam M, Memariani F, Pyšek P (2019) Effects of livestock grazing on soil, plant functional diversity, and ecological traits vary between regions with different climates in northeastern Iran. Ecology and Evolution, 9, 8225-8237. DOI
[39]	Ren Z, Peng H, Liu ZW (2016) The rapid climate change- caused dichotomy on subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in Yunnan: Reduction in habitat diversity and increase in species diversity. Plant Diversity, 38, 142-148. DOI URL
[40]	Ricotta C, de Bello F, Moretti M, Caccianiga M, Cerabolini BEL, Pavoine S (2016) Measuring the functional redundancy of biological communities: A quantitative guide. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 1386-1395. DOI URL
[41]	Rodríguez A, Vries FT, Manning P, Sebastià MT, Bardgett RD (2023) Soil abiotic properties shape plant functional diversity across temperate grassland plant communities. Ecosystems, 26, 1000-1017. DOI
[42]	Schleuter D, Daufresne M, Massol F, Argillier C (2010) A user’s guide to functional diversity indices. Ecological Monographs, 80, 469-484. DOI URL
[43]	Song YC (2004) Tentative classification scheme of evergreen broad-leaved forests of China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 28, 435-448. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[宋永昌(2004) 中国常绿阔叶林分类试行方案. 植物生态学报, 28, 435-448.] DOI
[44]	Song YC (2017) Vegetation Ecology. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[宋永昌 (2017) 植被生态学. 高等教育出版社, 北京.]
[45]	Su WH, Shi Z, Zhou R, Zhao YJ, Zhang GF (2015) The role of fire in the Central Yunnan Plateau ecosystem, southwestern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 356, 22-30. DOI URL
[46]	Tang CQ, Zhao MH, Li XS, Ohsawa M, Ou XK (2010) Secondary succession of plant communities in a subtropical mountainous region of SW China. Ecological Research, 25, 149-161. DOI URL
[47]	Tang R, Li SF, Lang XD, Huang XB, Su JR (2023) Rare species contribute greater to ecosystem multifunctionality in a subtropical forest than common species due to their functional diversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 538, 120981. DOI URL
[48]	Tian P, Cheng XQ, Han HR, Zhou WS (2017) Effects of environment factors on species diversity and functional diversity of the typical forest of Taiyue Mountain Shanxi, China. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 37, 992-1003. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[田平, 程小琴, 韩海荣, 周文嵩 (2017) 环境因子对山西太岳山典型森林类型物种多样性及其功能多样性的影响. 西北植物学报, 37, 992-1003.]
[49]	Vandewalle M, de Bello F, Berg MP, Bolger T, Dolédec S, Dubs F, Feld CK, Harrington R, Harrison PA, Lavorel S, da Silva PM, Moretti M, Niemelä J, Santos P, Sattler T, Sousa JP, Sykes MT, Vanbergen AJ, Woodcock BA (2010) Functional traits as indicators of biodiversity response to land use changes across ecosystems and organisms. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 2921-2947. DOI URL
[50]	Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2008) New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology, 89, 2290-2301. DOI PMID
[51]	Wang H, Wang RX, Harrison SP, Prentice IC (2022) Leaf morphological traits as adaptations to multiple climate gradients. Journal of Ecology, 110, 1344-1355. DOI PMID
[52]	Wang XH, Kent M, Fang XF (2007) Evergreen broad-leaved forest in eastern China: Its ecology and conservation and the importance of resprouting in forest restoration. Forest Ecology and Management, 245, 76-87. DOI URL
[53]	Wickham H (2016) ggplot2:Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org. (accessed on 2023-11-10)
[54]	Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee TL, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets Ü, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821-827. DOI
[55]	Xu YJ, Zhang Y, Shi M, Lu ZY (2020a) Environmental variation, functional diversity and identity predicting community biomass in an old-growth subtropical broad- leaved forest. Global Ecology and Conservation, 23, e01093.
[56]	Xu YJ, Zhang Y, Yang J, Lu ZY (2020b) Influence of tree functional diversity and stand environment on fine root biomass and necromass in four types of evergreen broad-leaved forests. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21, e00832.
[57]	Yao TH, Zhu ZH, Li YN, Pan SY, Kong BB, Wei XH, Du JL (2016) Effects of functional diversity and functional redundancy on the community stability of an alpine meadow. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 1547-1558. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[姚天华, 朱志红, 李英年, 潘石玉, 孔彬彬, 卫欣华, 杜家丽 (2016) 功能多样性和功能冗余对高寒草甸群落稳定性的影响. 生态学报, 36, 1547-1558.]
[58]	Yao XY, Hu YS, Liu YH (2014) Functional diversity of typical broad-leaved Korean pine forest communities in Changbai Mountains and its relationship with topographical factors. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 42, 95-102. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[么旭阳, 胡耀升, 刘艳红 (2014) 长白山阔叶红松林典型森林群落功能多样性及其与地形因子的关系. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 42, 95-102.]
[59]	Yu X, Wang X, Wu T, Wang QX, Ma Y, Xie L, Song NP (2021) Effects of enclosure on species diversity and functional diversity of desert steppe. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 35, 243-250. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[余轩, 王兴, 吴婷, 王启学, 马昀, 谢莉, 宋乃平 (2021) 围封对荒漠草原物种多样性和功能多样性的影响. 水土保持学报, 35, 243-250.]
[60]	Yuan ZJ, Wang XA, Wang LJ, Han BB, Li J (2018) Effects of tending on functional diversity of understory vegetation in Pinus tabuliformis plantation on the Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37, 339-346. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[原志坚, 王孝安, 王丽娟, 韩冰冰, 李静 (2018) 抚育对黄土高原油松人工林林下植被功能多样性的影响. 生态学杂志, 37, 339-346.]
[61]	Zhang JT, Fan LH (2011) Development of species functional diversity and its measurement methods. Journal of Mountain Science, 29, 513-519. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张金屯, 范丽宏 (2011) 物种功能多样性及其研究方法. 山地学报, 29, 513-519.]
[62]	Zhang SZ, Zang RG (2021) Tropical forests are vulnerable in terms of functional redundancy. Biological Conservation, 109326.
[63]	Zhao GF (2010) Beta Diversity and Functional Diversity in an Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest Community in East China. PhD dissertation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[赵谷风 (2010) 中国东部常绿阔叶林群落beta多样性和功能多样性研究. 博士学位论文, 浙江大学, 杭州.]
[64]	Zhou GX, Huang LX, Zang XW, Wei X, Ye WH, Shen H (2016) Effects of habitat heterogeneity on community functional diversity of Dinghu Mountain evergreen broad-leaved forest. Guihaia, 36, 127-136. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[周光霞, 黄立新, 臧晓蔚, 韦霄, 叶万辉, 沈浩 (2016) 生境异质性对鼎湖山常绿阔叶林群落功能多样性的影响. 广西植物, 36, 127-136.]
[65]	Zhu H (2021) Vegetation geography of evergreen broad-leaved forests in Yunnan, southwestern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 45, 224-241. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[朱华 (2021) 云南常绿阔叶林的植被地理研究. 植物生态学报, 45, 224-241.]

滇中半湿润常绿阔叶林木本植物的功能特征和功能多样性及其影响因子

Plant functional traits, community functional diversity and their environmental determinants of the semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forest in the Central Yunnan Plateau

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 65

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	曹可欣, 王敬雯, 郑国, 武鹏峰, 李英滨, 崔淑艳. 降水格局改变及氮沉降对北方典型草原土壤线虫多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23491-.
[2]	任嘉隆, 王永珍, 冯怡琳, 赵文智, 严祺涵, 秦畅, 方静, 辛未冬, 刘继亮. 基于陷阱法采集的河西走廊戈壁荒漠甲虫数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23375-.
[3]	张楚然, 李生发, 李逢昌, 唐志忠, 刘辉燕, 王丽红, 顾荣, 邓云, 张志明, 林露湘. 云南鸡足山亚热带半湿润常绿阔叶林20 ha动态监测样地木本植物生境关联与群落数量分类[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23393-.
[4]	曹亚苏, 范敏, 彭羽, 辛嘉讯, 彭楠一. 景观格局动态对浑善达克沙地植物物种多样性和功能多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23048-.
[5]	李发扬, 李滢钰, 蒋文妮, 刘曙光, 霍超, 孙巧奇, 邹红菲. 火后恢复时间影响大兴安岭寒温带森林内部与边缘鸟类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22665-.
[6]	陈晓澄, 张鹏展, 康斌, 刘林山, 赵亮. 基于中国科学院西北高原生物研究所馆藏标本分析青藏高原雀形目鸟类物种和功能多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22638-.
[7]	薛玉洁, 程安鹏, 李珊, 刘晓娟, 李景文. 亚热带森林中环境和物种多样性对灌木存活的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22443-.
[8]	张伟, 翟东东, 熊飞, 刘红艳, 陈元元, 王莹, 廖传松, 段辛斌, 田辉伍, 邓华堂, 陈大庆. 三峡库区鱼类群落结构和功能多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22136-.
[9]	饶杰生, 杨涛, 田希, 刘文聪, 王晓凤, 钱恒君, 沈泽昊. 基于背包LiDAR的半湿润常绿阔叶林及其常见树种的垂直结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23216-.
[10]	杨涛, 沈泽昊, 王晓凤, 饶杰生, 刘文聪, 田希, 陈稀, 张秋雨, 刘倩, 钱恒君, 解宇阳, 刘其明, 徐衍潇, 涂梦灵, 单子铭, 张玉坤, 侯波, 李建斌, 欧晓昆. 滇中高原亚热带半湿润常绿阔叶林植物群落多样性特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23238-.
[11]	田希, 刘文聪, 饶杰生, 王晓凤, 杨涛, 陈稀, 张秋雨, 刘其明, 徐衍潇, 张旭, 沈泽昊. 云南鸡足山半湿润常绿阔叶林的林隙干扰格局与成因[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23219-.
[12]	左艳洁, 彭明春, 王崇云, 沈泽昊, 李永萍, 周新茂, 周杰, 周光信, 任佳昕, 刘忠安. 滇中高原半湿润常绿阔叶林的岛屿化与物种多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23252-.
[13]	刘文聪, 田希, 杨涛, 饶杰生, 王晓凤, 钱恒君, 涂梦灵, 单子铭, 欧晓昆, 沈泽昊. 云南鸡足山半湿润常绿阔叶林优势树种的种群结构与更新特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23251-.
[14]	王健铭, 曲梦君, 王寅, 冯益明, 吴波, 卢琦, 何念鹏, 李景文. 青藏高原北部戈壁植物群落物种、功能与系统发育β多样性分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 21503-.
[15]	付飞, 魏慧玉, 常育腾, 王备新, 陈凯. 澜沧江中游水生昆虫生活史和生态学性状多样性的海拔格局: 气候和土地利用的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21332-.