火后恢复时间影响大兴安岭寒温带森林内部与边缘鸟类多样性

doi:10.17520/biods.2022665

生物多样性 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 22665. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022665

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

火后恢复时间影响大兴安岭寒温带森林内部与边缘鸟类多样性

李发扬¹^,², 李滢钰¹^,², 蒋文妮³, 刘曙光⁴, 霍超⁴, 孙巧奇¹^,²^,^*(), 邹红菲¹^,²

1.东北林业大学野生动物与自然保护地学院, 哈尔滨 150040
2.自然资源部寒地国土空间规划与生态保护修复重点实验室, 哈尔滨 150040
3.北京师范大学生命科学学院, 北京 100875
4.黑龙江南瓮河国家级自然保护区管理局, 黑龙江松岭 165012

收稿日期:2022-11-30 接受日期:2023-03-29 出版日期:2023-07-20 发布日期:2023-07-26
通讯作者: *E-mail: qiaoqi.sun@nefu.edu.cn
作者简介:*E-mail: qiaoqi.sun@nefu.edu.cn
基金资助:
黑龙江省自然科学基金(YQ2021C002);黑龙江省博士后科研启动金(LBH-Q20063);教育部中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2572021DT05)

How forest fires affect bird diversity over time in boreal forest interiors and edges in the Greater Khingan Mountains

Fayang Li¹^,², Yingyu Li¹^,², Wenni Jiang³, Shuguang Liu⁴, Chao Huo⁴, Qiaoqi Sun¹^,²^,^*(), Hongfei Zou¹^,²

1. College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040
2. Key Laboratory of National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Ministry of Natural Resources, Harbin 150040
3. College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
4. Heilongjiang Nanwenghe National Nature Reserve Administration, Songling, Heilongjiang 165012

Received:2022-11-30 Accepted:2023-03-29 Online:2023-07-20 Published:2023-07-26
Contact: *E-mail: qiaoqi.sun@nefu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中重度火干扰通常会显著改变森林结构与功能, 甚至引发森林演替, 严重影响鸟类群落组成与多样性。大兴安岭是我国林火高发热点地区之一, 但林火对鸟类多样性影响的研究较少, 特别是对功能多样性的影响尚不清楚。本研究于2021年7-8月在大兴安岭地区的黑龙江南瓮河国家级自然保护区, 采用样点法对森林鸟类展开调查, 量化不同林火干扰时间下森林内部和边缘鸟类功能多样性的差异。同时, 通过系统性文献检索, 进一步比较了大兴安岭地区不同林分组成与鸟类功能多样性的关系。结果发现: (1)不同林火事件后, 森林内部鸟类群落的组成差异较小, 但边缘鸟类组成差异较大; (2)森林内部的鸟类功能丰富度和均匀度随火后恢复时间增加逐渐升高, 并且在火后早期阶段森林边缘的功能丰富度更高; (3)随着火后恢复时间的增加, 森林边缘的留鸟比例增加, 夏候鸟比例减少; (4)在大兴安岭地区, 针阔混交林中的鸟类功能丰富度显著高于兴安落叶松(Larix gmelinii)林。本研究建议在大兴安岭寒温带森林中, 保持森林内部结构稳定性, 同时提升火后早期阶段森林边缘的植被多样性, 这有利于维持鸟类较高的功能丰富度和功能均匀度。

关键词: 鸟类群落, 大兴安岭, 火干扰, 森林演替, 功能多样性

Abstract

Aim: Moderate/high-severity fire is highly likely to induce changes in forest structure, function, and forest succession, which further threaten bird composition and diversity. Greater Khingan Mountains is a fire-prone region, however, little is known about how forest fires influence bird diversity, particularly its functional diversity.

Methods We used the point counts approach to survey birds and quantified changes in bird community structure and functional diversity after several fires had occurred at both forest interiors and edges in the Heilongjiang Nanwenghe National Nature Reserve from July to August 2021. Furthermore, a systematic literature review was conducted to investigate the relationship between forest composition and bird functional diversity in the Greater Khingan Mountains.

Results: The results showed (1) the difference in bird community composition was small in the forest interiors, but was great at forest edges, with different fire severity histories; (2) the functional richness and evenness of birds in the forest interiors gradually increased with the increased recovery time since the fire, and bird functional richness was greatest at the forest edges in the early stages of the post-fire disturbance; (3) over time since the post-fire recovery, the proportion of resident birds increased, but the proportion of summer migratory birds decreased at the forest edges; (4) bird functional richness was significantly higher in the mixed coniferous forests compared to the larch dominant forests in the Greater Khingan Mountains region.

Conclusions: This study suggests that maintaining the structural stability in forest interiors and enhancing plant diversity at the forest edges in the early stages of the post-fire are beneficial for maintaining high bird functional richness and evenness in the boreal forests.

Key words: bird community, Greater Khingan Mountains, fire disturbance, forest succession, functional diversity

李发扬, 李滢钰, 蒋文妮, 刘曙光, 霍超, 孙巧奇, 邹红菲 (2023) 火后恢复时间影响大兴安岭寒温带森林内部与边缘鸟类多样性. 生物多样性, 31, 22665. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022665.

Fayang Li, Yingyu Li, Wenni Jiang, Shuguang Liu, Chao Huo, Qiaoqi Sun, Hongfei Zou (2023) How forest fires affect bird diversity over time in boreal forest interiors and edges in the Greater Khingan Mountains. Biodiversity Science, 31, 22665. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022665.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2022665

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2023/V31/I7/22665

图/表 9

图1 黑龙江南瓮河国家级自然保护区鸟类野外调查样地分布图及其对应的林火历史。图中“FI”和“FE”分别是“forest interior”和“forest edge”的缩写。小图表示自然保护区边界。

Fig. 1 Bird sampling locations with different fire histories in the study area of the Heilongjiang Nanwenghe National Nature Reserve. “FI” and “FE” are abbreviations of “forest interior” and “forest edge” respectively. Inset map shows the boundary of the nature reserve.

图2 大兴安岭地区不同火后恢复时间森林内部和边缘样地示意图(大图), 小图为微生境图。FE-5: 火后5年的森林边缘; FE-15: 火后15年的森林边缘; FE-50: 火后50年的森林边缘; FI-5: 火后5年的森林内部; FI-15: 火后15年的森林内部; FI-50: 火后50年的森林内部。

Fig. 2 Photos of study areas at the forest interior and edge since post-fire recovery in the Greater Khingan Mountains. Inset maps show details of micro-habitats. FE-5, Forest edge 5 years post-fire; FE-15, Forest edge 15 years post-fire; FE-50, Forest edge 50 years post-fire; FI-5, Forest interior 5 years post-fire; FI-15, Forest interior 15 years post-fire; FI-50, Forest interior 50 years post-fire.

表1 不同火后恢复时间森林内部和边缘鸟类物种丰富度与多度

Table 1 Species richness and abundance of birds at the forest interior and edge since post-fire recovery

火后时间 Time since fire (yr)	生境类型 Habitat type	物种丰富度 Species richness	多度 Abundance	总计 Total
火后时间 Time since fire (yr)	生境类型 Habitat type	物种丰富度 Species richness	多度 Abundance	物种丰富度 Species richness	多度 Abundance
5	森林边缘 Forest edge	18	69	33 (80.5%)	173 (41.2%)
5	森林内部 Forest interior	23	104	33 (80.5%)	173 (41.2%)
15	森林边缘 Forest edge	14	68	20 (48.8%)	111 (26.4%)
15	森林内部 Forest interior	16	43	20 (48.8%)	111 (26.4%)
50	森林边缘 Forest edge	16	41	31 (75.6%)	136 (32.4%)
50	森林内部 Forest interior	23	95

图3 基于鸟类多度的样本覆盖度与物种丰富度估计。a: 基于鸟类多度对样本覆盖度的估计; b: 以图a估计的样本覆盖度为基础, 对物种丰富度进一步估计。

Fig. 3 Estimation of sample coverage and species richness based on bird abundance. a, Estimation of sample coverage based on bird abundance; b, Further estimation of species richness based on the sample coverage estimated in figure a.

表2 火后不同恢复时间森林内部和边缘的Jaccard指数(C)

Table 2 Jaccard index (C) at the forest interior and edge since post-fire recovery

		5年 5 years		15年 15 years		50年 50 years
		森林边缘 Forest edge	森林内部 Forest interior	森林边缘 Forest edge	森林内部 Forest interior	森林边缘 Forest edge
5年 5 years	森林内部 Forest interior	0.24
15年 15 years	森林边缘 Forest edge	0.33	0.28
15年 15 years	森林内部 Forest interior	0.26	0.50	0.38
50年 50 years	森林边缘 Forest edge	0.36	0.34	0.15	0.28
	森林内部 Forest interior	0.21	0.59	0.32	0.50	0.26

图4 火后不同恢复时间森林内部和边缘的鸟类功能丰富度(FRic)、功能均匀度(FEve)和功能离散度(FDiv)。不同字母表示组间差异显著, 大小写分别代表P < 0.01和P < 0.05。

Fig. 4 Functional richness (FRic), functional evenness (FEve) and functional divergence (FDiv) of birds at the forest interior and edge since post-fire recovery. Different letters indicate significant differences among groups, with upper and lower case letters representing P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively.

图5 火后不同恢复时间森林内部和边缘鸟类功能组成所占比例。FE-5: 火后5年的森林边缘; FE-15: 火后15年的森林边缘; FE-50: 火后50年的森林边缘; FI-5: 火后5年的森林内部; FI-15: 火后15年的森林内部; FI-50: 火后50年的森林内部。

Fig. 5 Proportion of functional composition of birds at the forest interior and edge since post-fire recovery. FE-5, Forest edge 5 years post-fire; FE-15, Forest edge 15 years post-fire; FE-50, Forest edge 50 years post-fire; FI-5, Forest interior 5 years post-fire; FI-15, Forest interior 15 years post-fire; FI-50, Forest interior 50 years post-fire.

图6 火后不同恢复时间森林内部和边缘鸟类功能丰富度(FRic)、功能均匀度(FEve)、功能离散度(FDiv)的标准化效应值(SES)。FE-5: 火后5年的森林边缘; FE-15: 火后15年的森林边缘; FE-50: 火后50年的森林边缘; FI-5: 火后5年的森林内部; FI-15: 火后15年的森林内部; FI-50: 火后50年的森林内部。

Fig. 6 Standardized effect size (SES) of functional richness (SES.FRic), functional evenness (SES.FEve) and functional divergence (SES.FDiv) at the forest interior and edge since post-fire recovery. FE-5, Forest edge 5 years post-fire; FE-15, Forest edge 15 years post-fire; FE-50, Forest edge 50 years post-fire; FI-5, Forest interior 5 years post-fire; FI-15, Forest interior 15 years post-fire; FI-50, Forest interior 50 years post-fire.

图7 大兴安岭地区不同林分组成下(落叶松、樟子松与混交林)鸟类丰富度、功能丰富度(FRic)、功能均匀度(FEve)、功能离散度(FDiv)的变化。* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01。

Fig. 7 Changes in bird richness, functional richness (FRic), functional evenness (FEve), functional divergence (FDiv) under different forest compositions (Larix gmelinii, Pinus sylvestris and mixed forest) in the Greater Khingan Mountains. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

参考文献 62

[1]	Andrikou-Charitidou A, Boutsis G, Karadimou E, Kallimanis AS (2020) Untangling the positive association of phylogenetic, functional, and taxonomic diversity with alien bird species richness. Ecosphere, 11, e03007.
[2]	Barbaro L, Giffard B, Charbonnier Y, van Halder I, Brockerhoff EG (2014) Bird functional diversity enhances insectivory at forest edges: A transcontinental experiment. Diversity and Distributions, 20, 149-159. DOI URL
[3]	Barnagaud JY, Barbaro L, Papaïx J, Deconchat M, Brockerhoff EG (2014) Habitat filtering by landscape and local forest composition in native and exotic New Zealand birds. Ecology, 95, 78-87. DOI URL
[4]	Barton PS, Ikin K, Smith AL, MacGregor C, Lindenmayer DB (2014) Vegetation structure moderates the effect of fire on bird assemblages in a heterogeneous landscape. Landscape Ecology, 29, 703-714.
[5]	Bouvet A, Paillet Y, Archaux F, Tillon L, Denis P, Gilg O, Gosselin F (2016) Effects of forest structure, management and landscape on bird and bat communities. Environmental Conservation, 43, 148-160. DOI URL
[6]	Burton PJ, Messier C, Adamowicz WL, Kuuluvainen T (2006) Sustainable management of Canada's boreal forests: Progress and prospects. Écoscience, 13, 234-248. DOI URL
[7]	Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Shen TJ (2005) A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecology Letters, 8, 148-159. DOI URL
[8]	Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Hsieh TC, Sander EL, Ma KH, Colwell RK, Ellison AM (2014) Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: A framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecological Monographs, 84, 45-67. DOI URL
[9]	Clark-Wolf K, Higuera PE, Davis KT (2022) Conifer seedling demography reveals mechanisms of initial forest resilience to wildfires in the northern Rocky Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management, 523, 120487. DOI URL
[10]	Clough Y, Dwi Putra D, Pitopang R, Tscharntke T (2009) Local and landscape factors determine functional bird diversity in Indonesian cacao agroforestry. Biological Conservation, 142, 1032-1041. DOI URL
[11]	Connell J, Hall MA, Nimmo DG, Watson SJ, Clarke MF (2022) Fire, drought and flooding rains: The effect of climatic extremes on bird species' responses to time since fire. Diversity and Distributions, 28, 417-438. DOI URL
[12]	de Bello F, Price JN, Münkemüller T, Liira J, Zobel M, Thuiller W, Gerhold P, Götzenberger L, Lavergne S, Lepš J, Zobel K, Pärtel M (2012) Functional species pool framework to test for biotic effects on community assembly. Ecology, 93, 2263-2273. PMID
[13]	Ding ZF, Liang JC, Feng YJ, Liu JC, Hu HJ (2020) Functional and phylogenetic diversity of birds in urban habitat patches in Macao, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 39, 1238-1247. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[丁志锋, 梁健超, 冯永军, 刘金成, 胡慧建 (2020) 澳门城市栖息地斑块中鸟类群落功能和谱系多样性. 生态学杂志, 39, 1238-1247.]
[14]	Ehlers Smith YC, Ehlers Smith DA, Seymour CL, Thébault E, Frank van Veen FJ (2015) Response of avian diversity to habitat modification can be predicted from life-history traits and ecological attributes. Landscape Ecology, 30, 1225-1239. DOI URL
[15]	Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Blomberg SP, Montague-Drake R, Felton A, Stein JA (2007) Functional richness and relative resilience of bird communities in regions with different land use intensities. Ecosystems, 10, 964-974.
[16]	Florenzano GT (2004) Birds as indicators of recent environmental changes in the Apennines (Foreste Casentinesi National Park, central Italy). Italian Journal of Zoology, 71, 317-324. DOI URL
[17]	Fontaine JB, Donato DC, Robinson WD, Law BE, Kauffman JB (2009) Bird communities following high-severity fire: Response to single and repeat fires in a mixed-evergreen forest, Oregon, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 1496-1504.
[18]	Freeman AND, Freebody K, Montenero M, Moran C, Shoo LP, Catterall CP (2021) Enhancing bird-mediated seed dispersal to increase rainforest regeneration in disused pasture—A restoration experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 479, 118536. DOI URL
[19]	Gregory RD, Gibbons DW, Donald PF (2004) Bird census and survey techniques. In: Bird Ecology and Conservation (eds Sutherland WJ, Newton I, Green R), pp. 17-56. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[20]	Haddad NM, Holyoak M, Mata TM, Davies KF, Melbourne BA, Preston K (2008) Species' traits predict the effects of disturbance and productivity on diversity. Ecology Letters, 11, 348-356. DOI PMID
[21]	Hansen AJ, Urban DL (1992) Avian response to landscape pattern: The role of species' life histories. Landscape Ecology, 7, 163-180. DOI URL
[22]	Harper KA, MacDonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen JQ, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen PA (2005) Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology, 19, 768-782. DOI URL
[23]	Hart SA, Chen HYH (2006) Understory vegetation dynamics of North American boreal forests. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 25, 381-397. DOI URL
[24]	Hu HQ, Zhao ZK, Wang XC, Zhang YD (2010) Fire history of Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) forests in Mengkeshan of Tahe, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 6372-6379. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[胡海清, 赵致奎, 王晓春, 张远东 (2010) 基于树轮火疤塔河蒙克山樟子松林火灾的频度分析. 生态学报, 30, 6372-6379.]
[25]	Ibarra JT, Martin K (2015) Beyond species richness: An empirical test of top predators as surrogates for functional diversity and endemism. Ecosphere, 6, 1-15.
[26]	Jarzyna MA, Quintero I, Jetz W (2021) Global functional and phylogenetic structure of avian assemblages across elevation and latitude. Ecology Letters, 24, 196-207. DOI PMID
[27]	Johnson EA, Miyanishi K, Weir JMH (1998) Wildfires in the western Canadian boreal forest: Landscape patterns and ecosystem management. Journal of Vegetation Science, 9, 603-610. DOI URL
[28]	Kotliar NB, Hejl SJ, Hutto RL, Saab VA, Melcher CP, McFadzen ME (2002) Effects of fire and post-fire salvage logging on avian communities in conifer-dominated forests of the western United States. Studies in Avian Biology, 25, 49-64.
[29]	Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vázquez DP, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein AM, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: A conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecology Letters, 10, 299-314. PMID
[30]	Laliberté E, Legendre P (2010) A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology, 91, 299-305. PMID
[31]	Laurance WF, Nascimento HEM, Laurance SG, Andrade A, Ewers RM, Harms KE, Luizão RCC, Ribeiro JE (2007) Habitat fragmentation, variable edge effects, and the landscape-divergence hypothesis. PLoS ONE, 2, e1017. DOI PMID
[32]	Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Gross N, Maestre FT, Maire V, de Bello F, Fonseca CR, Kattge J, Valencia E, Leps J, Liancourt P (2017) Testing the environmental filtering concept in global drylands. Journal of Ecology, 105, 1058-1069. DOI PMID
[33]	Li J, Wang W (2009) Avian diversity of different habitats of grassland-forest ecosystem in Honghuaerji, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 37(10), 39-43. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李健, 王文 (2009) 内蒙古红花尔基地区草原-森林生态系统不同生境鸟类多样性. 东北林业大学学报, 37(10), 39-43.]
[34]	Li JX, Mammides C, Zhou LP, Sun JJ, Tan XC, Jiang AW (2022) Bird diversity in different habitats under agriculturalization in Guangxi, China. Biodiversity Science, 30, 21515. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[李家兴, Christos Mammides, 周丽萍, 孙家杰, 谭筱彩, 蒋爱伍 (2022) 广西山地农业化背景下鸟类多样性比较. 生物多样性, 30, 21515.] DOI
[35]	Lindenmayer D, Blanchard W, Tennant P, Barton P, Ikin K, Mortelliti A, Okada S, Crane M, Michael D (2015) Richness is not all: How changes in avian functional diversity reflect major landscape modification caused by pine plantations. Diversity and Distributions, 21, 836-847. DOI URL
[36]	Lindenmayer DB, Blanchard W, Blair D, Westgate MJ, Scheele BC (2019) Spatiotemporal effects of logging and fire on tall, wet temperate eucalypt forest birds. Ecological Applications, 29, e01999.
[37]	Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF, Fischer J (2006) General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 131, 433-445.
[38]	Martin LC (1987) Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, Orlando.
[39]	Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: The primary components of functional diversity. Oikos, 111, 112-118. DOI URL
[40]	Montaño-Centellas FA, McCain C, Loiselle BA (2020) Using functional and phylogenetic diversity to infer avian community assembly along elevational gradients. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29, 232-245. DOI URL
[41]	Münkemüller T, de Bello F, Meynard CN, Gravel D, Lavergne S, Mouillot D, Mouquet N, Thuiller W (2012) From diversity indices to community assembly processes: A test with simulated data. Ecography, 35, 468-480.
[42]	Newbold T, Scharlemann JPW, Butchart SHM, Sekercioğlu CH, Alkemade R, Booth H, Purves DW (2013) Ecological traits affect the response of tropical forest bird species to land-use intensity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20122131.
[43]	Novoa FJ, Altamirano TA, Bonacic C, Martin K, Ibarra JT (2021) Fire regimes shape biodiversity: Responses of avian guilds to burned forests in Andean temperate ecosystems of southern Chile. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 16, art22.
[44]	Parks SA, Abatzoglou JT (2020) Warmer and drier fire seasons contribute to increases in area burned at high severity in western US forests from 1985 to 2017. Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL089858.
[45]	Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002) Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecology Letters, 5, 402-411. DOI URL
[46]	Pons P, Clavero M (2010) Bird responses to fire severity and time since fire in managed mountain rangelands. Animal Conservation, 13, 294-305. DOI URL
[47]	R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.r-project.org/. (accessed on 2020-06-01)
[48]	Rainsford FW, Kelly LT, Leonard SWJ, Bennett AF (2022) Fire and functional traits: Using functional groups of birds and plants to guide management in a fire-prone, heathy woodland ecosystem. Diversity and Distributions, 28, 372-385. DOI URL
[49]	Schieck J, Hobson KA (2000) Bird communities associated with live residual tree patches within cut blocks and burned habitat in mixedwood boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30, 1281-1295. DOI URL
[50]	Schieck J, Song S (2006) Changes in bird communities throughout succession following fire and harvest in boreal forests of western North America: Literature review and meta-analyses. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1299-1318. DOI URL
[51]	Schleuter D, Daufresne M, Massol F, Argillier C (2010) A user's guide to functional diversity indices. Ecological Monographs, 80, 469-484. DOI URL
[52]	Sitters H, Di Stefano J, Christie F, Swan M, York A (2016) Bird functional diversity decreases with time since disturbance: Does patchy prescribed fire enhance ecosystem function? Ecological Applications, 26, 115-127. PMID
[53]	Smucker KM, Hutto RL, Steele BM (2005) Changes in bird abundance after wildfire: Importance of fire severity and time since fire. Ecological Applications, 15, 1535-1549. DOI URL
[54]	Spasojevic MJ, Copeland S, Suding KN (2014) Using functional diversity patterns to explore metacommunity dynamics: A framework for understanding local and regional influences on community structure. Ecography, 37, 939-949. DOI URL
[55]	Taillie PJ, Burnett RD, Roberts LJ, Campos BR, Peterson MN, Moorman CE (2018) Interacting and non-linear avian responses to mixed-severity wildfire and time since fire. Ecosphere, 9, e02291.
[56]	Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: The importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 79-92. DOI URL
[57]	Venn SE, Green K, Pickering CM, Morgan JW (2011) Using plant functional traits to explain community composition across a strong environmental filter in Australian alpine snowpatches. Plant Ecology, 212, 1491-1499. DOI URL
[58]	Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2008) New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology, 89, 2290-2301. DOI PMID
[59]	Waito J, Girardin MP, Tardif JC, Conciatori F, Bergeron Y, Ali AA (2018) Recent fire activity in the boreal eastern interior of North America is below that of the past 2000 yr. Ecosphere, 9, e02287.
[60]	Wang YP, Song YF, Zhong YX, Chen CW, Zhao YH, Zeng D, Wu YR, Ding P (2021) A dataset on the life-history and ecological traits of Chinese birds. Biodiversity Science, 29, 1149-1153. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[王彦平, 宋云枫, 钟雨茜, 陈传武, 赵郁豪, 曾頔, 吴亦如, 丁平 (2021) 中国鸟类的生活史和生态学特征数据集. 生物多样性, 29, 1149-1153.] DOI
[61]	White AM, Manley PN, Tarbill GL, Richardson TW, Russell RE, Safford HD, Dobrowski SZ (2016) Avian community responses to post-fire forest structure: Implications for fire management in mixed conifer forests. Animal Conservation, 19, 256-264. DOI URL
[62]	Yang J, Kong JJ, Liu B (2013) A review of effects of fire disturbance on understory vegetation in boreal coniferous forest. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 474-480. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[杨健, 孔健健, 刘波 (2013) 林火干扰对北方针叶林林下植被的影响. 植物生态学报, 37, 474-480.] DOI

火后恢复时间影响大兴安岭寒温带森林内部与边缘鸟类多样性

How forest fires affect bird diversity over time in boreal forest interiors and edges in the Greater Khingan Mountains

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 62

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	曹亚苏, 范敏, 彭羽, 辛嘉讯, 彭楠一. 景观格局动态对浑善达克沙地植物物种多样性和功能多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23048-.
[2]	赵坤明, 陈圣宾, 杨锡福. 基于红外相机技术调查四川都江堰破碎化森林鸟兽多样性及优势种活动节律[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22529-.
[3]	湛振杰, 张超, 陈敏豪, 王嘉栋, 富爱华, 范雨薇, 栾晓峰. 基于DNA宏条形码技术的大兴安岭北部欧亚水獭冬季食性分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22586-.
[4]	陈晓澄, 张鹏展, 康斌, 刘林山, 赵亮. 基于中国科学院西北高原生物研究所馆藏标本分析青藏高原雀形目鸟类物种和功能多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22638-.
[5]	张伟, 翟东东, 熊飞, 刘红艳, 陈元元, 王莹, 廖传松, 段辛斌, 田辉伍, 邓华堂, 陈大庆. 三峡库区鱼类群落结构和功能多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22136-.
[6]	罗彩访, 杨涛, 张秋雨, 王馨培, 沈泽昊. 滇中半湿润常绿阔叶林木本植物的功能特征和功能多样性及其影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23215-.
[7]	汪婷, 周立志. 合肥市小微湿地鸟类多样性的时空格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 21445-.
[8]	姜晓燕, 高圣杰, 蒋燕, 田赟, 贾昕, 查天山. 毛乌素沙地植被不同恢复阶段植物群落物种多样性、功能多样性和系统发育多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21387-.
[9]	李海萍, 徐竹青, 龙志航. 大兴安岭地区重点保护和珍稀动物保护空缺分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(2): 21294-.
[10]	陈秋菊, 孙智闲, 李雪健, 张睿, 席蕊, 田晨, 王鑫, 邢迎春, 赵亚辉. 武夷山国家公园及其周边鱼类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(11): 22260-.
[11]	贺佳云, 张东, 储玲, 严云志. 人为干扰对溪流鱼类功能多样性及其纵向梯度格局的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 927-937.
[12]	黄小波, 郎学东, 李帅锋, 刘万德, 苏建荣. 生态系统多功能性的指标选择与驱动因子: 研究现状与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(12): 1673-1686.
[13]	王宇彤, 牛克昌. 青藏高原高寒草甸土壤环境对线虫功能多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(6): 707-717.
[14]	刘君, 王宁, 崔岱宗, 卢磊, 赵敏. 大小兴安岭可培养细菌的资源多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(8): 903-910.
[15]	吕美林, 刘泽, 宋震, 王亚宁, 刘小勇. 大兴安岭地区可培养毛霉门真菌多样性与分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(8): 821-832.