生物多样性

• • 上一篇    下一篇

川西新龙县食肉动物多样性格局及公益保护地的潜在补充保护价值

陈星, 付明霞, 曾潇雨, 彭李香, 晋雨漪, 泽翁英措, 杨志松, 杨彪   

  1. 西华师范大学, 637009
    北京市企业家环保基金会, 100020
    四川天府新区爱思益生态保护中心, 610000
    四川省大熊猫研究院, 610081
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-20 修回日期:2026-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈星
  • 基金资助:
    西华师范大学博士科研启动项目(24KE038)

Carnivore community diversity patterns and the potential complementary conservation value of community co-managed conservation areas in Xinlong County, western Sichuan, China

Xing Chen, Mingxia Fu, Xiaoyu Zeng, Lixiang Peng, Yuyi Jin, Yingcuo Zeweng, Zhisong Yang, Biao Yang   

  1. , China West Normal University 637009,
    , 100020,
    , 610000,
    , 610081,
  • Received:2026-07-20 Revised:2026-10-15
  • Contact: Xing Chen
  • Supported by:
    Fundamental Research Funds of China West Normal University(24KE038)

摘要: 为评估川西高山峡谷区食肉动物群落多样性格局及公益保护地对现有保护网络的潜在补充价值, 本研究基于2018—2024年在四川省甘孜州新龙县436个相机位点、304个监测网络的红外相机, 累计147,823个有效工作日, 比较不同保护地类型的食肉动物α多样性与群落组成, 并从物种集合、标准化物种丰富度和优先保护空间覆盖等方面评估公益保护地的潜在补充价值。结果表明:1) 共记录食肉动物4科17种。公益保护地网格的观测物种丰富度和Shannon指数均显著高于法定保护地和保护地外区域;在考虑监测努力、海拔和地形起伏后, 公益保护地的观测物种丰富度仍显著高于保护地外区域(丰富度比值为1.30, 95%CI: 1.11–1.52), 但与法定保护地之间的差异不显著。2) 多因素PERMANOVA显示, 保护地类型、海拔带和监测努力均与群落组成差异相关; 保护地类型间的组内离散度差异不显著, 而海拔带间存在组内离散度差异。3) 公益保护地记录到本次调查的全部17种食肉动物, 较法定保护地补充记录兔狲、石貂和荒漠猫3种, 其中兔狲和石貂仅在公益保护地记录到。将各网格监测投入统一至100个有效工作日后, 共识别出76个高丰富度网格, 其中公益保护地覆盖53个, 法定保护地覆盖6个;结合大型食肉动物累计记录识别的226个优先网格中, 两类保护地分别覆盖142个和36个。研究表明, 在本次调查范围内, 公益保护地在食肉动物物种记录和重要网格覆盖方面具有潜在补充价值, 可为当地多类型保护单元的协同规划与后续监测提供参考。

关键词: 红外相机, 食肉动物群落, 公益保护地, 保护互补性, 中国西南山地

Abstract

Aims: To characterize carnivore community diversity in the alpine canyon landscapes of Xinlong County, western Sichuan, China, and assess the potential complementarity of community co-managed conservation areas (CCAs) to statutory protected areas. 

Methods: We analyzed camera-trap data collected during 2018–2024 from 436 sites across 304 monitoring grids, totaling 147,823 effective camera-trap days. We compared alpha diversity and community composition among protected-area types and assessed complementarity through species sets, standardized species richness, and priority-grid coverage. 

Results: We recorded 17 carnivore species from four families. Observed grid-level species richness and Shannon diversity were significantly higher in CCAs than in statutory protected areas and areas outside protected areas. After accounting for monitoring effort, elevation, and topographic ruggedness, observed richness remained significantly higher in CCAs than outside protected areas (richness ratio = 1.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.11–1.52), whereas the difference between CCAs and statutory protected areas was not significant. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance indicated that protected-area type, elevational band, and monitoring effort were associated with differences in community composition. Within-group dispersion differed among elevational bands but not among protected-area types. CCAs recorded all 17 species detected during the survey, including three species not recorded in statutory protected areas: Pallas’s cat, beech marten, and Chinese mountain cat. Pallas’s cat and beech marten were detected only in CCAs during this survey. Rarefaction to 100 effective camera-trap days per grid identified 76 high-richness grids, of which 53 were in CCAs and six in statutory protected areas. Combining these grids with cumulative large-carnivore records identified 226 priority grids, including 142 in CCAs and 36 in statutory protected areas. 

Conclusions: Within the surveyed landscapes, CCAs showed potential complementary value through additional carnivore species records and coverage of important monitoring grids beyond statutory protected areas. These findings can inform coordinated planning and further monitoring across local conservation units.

Key words: camera trapping, carnivore community, co-managed conservation areas, conservation complementarity, Mountains of Southwest China