生物多样性

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于功能性状解析东北针阔混交林主要树种的生态策略差异

刘晓鹏1, 汪欣烨1, 岳庆敏2, 白杨3, 张春雨1, 赵秀海1, 郝珉辉1*   

  1. 1. 北京林业大学国家林业和草原局森林经营工程技术研究中心, 北京 100083; 2. 应急管理部国家自然灾害防治研究院, 北京 100085; 3. 兴安盟林业科学研究所, 内蒙古乌兰浩特 137400
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-13 修回日期:2025-10-13 接受日期:2025-11-27
  • 通讯作者: 郝珉辉
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32201555); 应急管理部国家自然灾害防治研究院基本科研业务专项(ZDJ2025-31)

Unraveling the ecological strategies of major tree species in a mixed conifer- broadleaf forest of Northeast China: Insights from functional traits

Xiaopeng Liu1, Xinye Wang1, Qingmin Yue2, Yang Bai3, Chunyu Zhang1, Xiuhai Zhao1, Minhui Hao1*   

  1. 1 Research Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China 

    2 National Institute of Natural Hazards, Ministry of Emergency Management, Beijing 100085, China 

    3 Xing’an League Institute of Forestry, Ulanhot, Nei Mongol 137400, China

  • Received:2025-08-13 Revised:2025-10-13 Accepted:2025-11-27
  • Contact: Minhui Hao
  • Supported by:
    the Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(32201555); the Research Grants from National Institute of Natural Hazards, Ministry of Emergency Management of China(ZDJ2025-31)

摘要: 植物功能性状是指与植物定植、存活、生长和死亡紧密相关的一系列核心属性, 功能性状间的权衡与协同决定了植物的生态策略。基于植物功能性状探索群落内物种间的生态策略差异, 不仅有助于阐明物种共存机制, 同时对于揭示森林生态系统过程以及气候变化下的植被响应都具有重要意义。本研究以吉林蛟河21.12 ha次生针阔混交林动态监测样地为依托, 选取32个主要树种的8类关键功能性状, 基于植物竞争–耐胁迫–杂草(competitor–stress tolerator–ruderal, CSR)策略理论划分主要树种的生态策略类型; 并结合聚类分析与主成分分析揭示不同树种的生态策略差异; 最后通过Spearman相关性分析计算了每个树种在主成分分析中的得分与其C、S、R策略值之间的相关性系数, 以检验植物生态策略的功能性状基础。结果表明: (1)基于CSR策略分析, 32个树种可以划分为6种生态策略类型, 并以耐胁迫/竞争–耐胁迫–杂草型(S/CSR)占比最高; (2)基于聚类分析, 32个树种可以划分为2大类(即针叶树与阔叶树), 同时阔叶树可进一步细分为7小类(包括先锋树种、顶极阔叶树种、灌木、小乔木等); (3)主成分分析和Spearman相关性分析显示, 不同树种间的功能性状呈显著分化, 阔叶树整体趋向较大的叶面积、比叶面积和叶氮含量, 表现出较强的竞争能力(高C值), 而针叶树则趋向较高的叶碳含量和叶干物质含量, 表现出较强的耐胁迫能力(高S值); 灌木和小乔木类则倾向于高扰动适应性(高R值)。本研究系统揭示了东北次生针阔混交林内主要树种的生态策略差异及其功能性状基础, 证实了基于CSR策略理论与基于主成分分析获得的性状变异轴具有高度一致性, 为理解温带次生针阔混交林内主要树种的生态策略提供了功能生态学基础。

关键词: 生态策略, 功能性状, 植物CSR策略, 性状权衡, 针阔混交林

Abstract

Aims: Plant functional traits refer to a series of core attributes that are closely associated with plant establishment, survival, growth, and mortality. The trade-offs and synergies among functional traits determine the ecological strategy of plants. Exploring interspecific differences in ecological strategies based on functional traits not only enhances our understanding of species coexistence mechanisms, but also provides insights into community succession and vegetation responses under climate change. 

Methods: This study was conducted in a 21.12 ha mixed conifer-broadleaf forest dynamic plot in Jiaohe, Jilin Province. Eight key functional traits were measured for 32 tree species. Tree species were classified into different ecological types based on the competitor–stress tolerator–ruderal (CSR) strategy theory. We then integrated cluster analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) to reveal the differences in ecological strategies among different tree species. Finally, Spearman correlation analysis was employed to calculate the correlation coefficients between each species’ scores on the principal components and its C, S, R strategy values, thereby testing the functional trait basis underlying plant ecological strategies. 

Results: (1) Based on CSR classification, the 32 tree species were grouped into six ecological strategy types, with the stress tolerator/competitor–stress tolerator–ruderal (S/CSR) type having the highest proportion. (2) Cluster analysis divided species into two major groups (i.e., conifers and broadleaf trees), with broadleaf trees further subdivided into seven functional subgroups (pioneer tree species, transitional tree species, climax hardwood tree species, etc.). (3) Principal component analysis and Spearman correlation analysis showed that functional traits exhibited clear differentiation among tree species. Broadleaf species tended to exhibit greater leaf area, specific leaf area, and leaf nitrogen content, indicating stronger competitive ability (C values). In contrast, conifers exhibited greater leaf carbon content and leaf dry mass content, indicating stronger stress tolerance (S values). Shrubs and small trees exhibited higher wood density and lower maximum height, corresponding to greater disturbance adaptability (R values). 

Conclusion: This study highlights distinct ecological strategies among major tree species in temperate mixed forests and demonstrates a strong alignment between CSR strategies and the trait axes identified by principal component analysis. These findings thus provide important functional trait-based perspectives on species ecological strategies in temperate mixed conifer-broadleaf forests.

Key words: ecological strategies, functional traits, plant CSR strategy, trait trade-offs, mixed conifer-broadleaf forest