基于功能性状解析东北针阔混交林主要树种的生态策略差异

doi:10.17520/biods.2025324

生物多样性 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 25324. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025324 cstr: 32101.14.biods.2025324

基于功能性状解析东北针阔混交林主要树种的生态策略差异

刘晓鹏¹, 汪欣烨¹, 岳庆敏²(), 白杨³(), 张春雨¹(), 赵秀海¹(), 郝珉辉¹^,^*()()

¹ 北京林业大学国家林业和草原局森林经营工程技术研究中心, 北京 100083
² 应急管理部国家自然灾害防治研究院, 北京 100085
³ 兴安盟林业科学研究所, 内蒙古乌兰浩特 137400

收稿日期:2025-08-24 接受日期:2025-10-27 出版日期:2025-11-20 发布日期:2026-01-07
通讯作者: 郝珉辉
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32201555);兴安盟本级科技合作项目(MBHZ2024018);北京林业大学大学生创新创业训练计划(202510022009)

Unraveling the ecological strategies of major tree species in a mixed conifer- broadleaf forest of Northeast China: Insights from functional traits

Xiaopeng Liu¹, Xinye Wang¹, Qingmin Yue²(), Yang Bai³(), Chunyu Zhang¹(), Xiuhai Zhao¹(), Minhui Hao¹^,^*()()

¹ Research Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
² National Institute of Natural Hazards, Ministry of Emergency Management, Beijing 100085, China
³ Xing’an League Institute of Forestry, Ulanhot, Nei Mongol 137400, China

Received:2025-08-24 Accepted:2025-10-27 Online:2025-11-20 Published:2026-01-07
Contact: Minhui Hao
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32201555);Xing’an League-level Science & Technology Cooperation Program(MBHZ2024018);Beijing Forestry University Student Innovation & Entrepreneurship Development Program(202510022009)

1. 附录.pdf(188KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

植物功能性状是指与植物定植、存活、生长和死亡紧密相关的一系列核心属性, 功能性状间的权衡与协同决定了植物的生态策略。基于植物功能性状探索群落内物种间的生态策略差异, 不仅有助于阐明物种共存机制, 同时对于揭示森林生态系统过程以及气候变化下的植被响应都具有重要意义。本研究以吉林蛟河21.12 ha次生针阔混交林动态监测样地为依托, 选取32个主要树种的8类关键功能性状, 基于植物竞争-耐胁迫-杂草(competitor-stress tolerator-ruderal, CSR)策略理论划分主要树种的生态策略类型; 并结合聚类分析与主成分分析揭示不同树种的生态策略差异; 最后通过Spearman相关性分析计算了每个树种在主成分分析中的得分与其C、S、R策略值之间的相关性系数, 以检验植物生态策略的功能性状基础。结果表明: (1)基于CSR策略分析, 32个树种可以划分为6种生态策略类型, 并以耐胁迫/竞争-耐胁迫-杂草型(S/CSR)占比最高; (2)基于聚类分析, 32个树种可以划分为2大类(即针叶树与阔叶树), 同时阔叶树可进一步细分为7小类(包括先锋树种、顶极阔叶树种、灌木、小乔木等); (3)主成分分析和Spearman相关性分析显示, 不同树种间的功能性状呈显著分化, 阔叶树整体趋向较大的叶面积、比叶面积和叶氮含量, 表现出较强的竞争能力(高C策略值), 而针叶树则趋向较高的叶碳含量和叶干物质含量, 表现出较强的耐胁迫能力(高S策略值); 灌木和小乔木类则倾向于高扰动适应性(高R策略值)。本研究系统揭示了东北次生针阔混交林内主要树种的生态策略差异及其功能性状基础, 证实了基于CSR策略理论与基于主成分分析获得的性状变异轴具有高度一致性, 为理解温带次生针阔混交林内主要树种的生态策略提供了功能生态学基础。

关键词: 生态策略, 功能性状, 植物CSR策略, 性状权衡, 针阔混交林

Abstract

Aims: Plant functional traits refer to a series of core attributes that are closely associated with plant establishment, survival, growth, and mortality. The trade-offs and synergies among functional traits determine the ecological strategy of plants. Exploring interspecific differences in ecological strategies based on functional traits not only enhances our understanding of species coexistence mechanisms, but also provides insights into community succession and vegetation responses under climate change.

Methods: This study was conducted in a 21.12-ha mixed conifer-broadleaf forest dynamics plot in Jiaohe, Jilin Province. Eight key functional traits were measured for 32 tree species. Tree species were classified into different ecological types based on the competitor-stress tolerator-ruderal (CSR) strategy theory. We then integrated cluster analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) to reveal the differences in ecological strategies among different tree species. Finally, Spearman correlation analysis was employed to calculate the correlation coefficients between each species’ scores on the principal components and its C, S, R strategy values, thereby testing the functional trait basis underlying plant ecological strategies.

Results: (1) Based on CSR classification, the 32 tree species were grouped into six ecological strategy types, with the stress tolerator/competitor-stress tolerator-ruderal (S/CSR) type having the highest proportion. (2) Cluster analysis divided species into two major groups (i.e., conifers and broadleaf trees), with broadleaf trees further subdivided into seven functional subgroups (pioneer species, transitional species, climax broadleaf species, etc.). (3) Principal component analysis and Spearman correlation analysis show that functional traits exhibited clear differentiation among tree species. Broadleaf species tended to exhibit greater leaf area, specific leaf area, and leaf nitrogen content, indicating stronger competitive ability (high C values). In contrast, conifers exhibited greater leaf carbon content and leaf dry mass content, indicating stronger stress tolerance (high S values). Shrubs and small trees exhibited higher wood density and lower maximum height, corresponding to greater disturbance adaptability (high R values).

Conclusion: This study highlights distinct ecological strategies among major tree species in temperate secondary mixed forests and demonstrates a strong alignment between CSR strategies and the trait axes identified by principal component analysis. These findings thus provide important functional trait-based perspectives on species ecological strategies in temperate mixed conifer-broadleaf forests.

Key words: ecological strategies, functional traits, plant CSR strategy, trait trade-offs, mixed conifer-broadleaf forest

刘晓鹏, 汪欣烨, 岳庆敏, 白杨, 张春雨, 赵秀海, 郝珉辉 (2025) 基于功能性状解析东北针阔混交林主要树种的生态策略差异. 生物多样性, 33, 25324. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025324.

Xiaopeng Liu, Xinye Wang, Qingmin Yue, Yang Bai, Chunyu Zhang, Xiuhai Zhao, Minhui Hao (2025) Unraveling the ecological strategies of major tree species in a mixed conifer- broadleaf forest of Northeast China: Insights from functional traits. Biodiversity Science, 33, 25324. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025324.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2025324

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2025/V33/I11/25324

图/表 4

图1 中国东北针阔混交林32个树种竞争-耐胁迫-杂草生态策略分类。S: 耐胁迫型; S/CSR: 耐胁迫/竞争-耐胁迫-杂草型; CSR: 竞争-耐胁迫-杂草型; CS/CSR: 竞争-耐胁迫/竞争-耐胁迫-杂草型; C/CSR: 竞争/竞争-耐胁迫-杂草型; C/CS: 竞争/竞争-耐胁迫型。

Fig. 1 Classification of the competitor-stress tolerator- ruderal ecological strategy among 32 tree species in a mixed conifer-broadleaf forest of Northeast China. S, Stress tolerator; S/CSR, Stress tolerator /competitor-stress tolerator-ruderal; CSR, Competitor-stress tolerator-ruderal; CS/CSR, Competitor-stress tolerator/competitor-stress tolerator-ruderal; C/CSR, Competitor/competitor-stress tolerator-ruderal; C/CS, Competitor /competitor-stress tolerator.

图2 植物功能性状聚类结果。(a)植物功能性状聚类树, 不同颜色区域代表不同的树种分类, 右侧字母和数字的组合表示分类序号, 全部树种共分为A、B两个大类, 其中B大类又分为7个小类; (b)聚类分析折线图, 峰值表示聚类分析的最佳分组数。

Fig. 2 Clustering results of plant functional traits. (a) Clustering dendrogram of the plant functional traits. Different color represents different tree species classifications, with the letter-number combinations on the right indicating the classification serial numbers. All tree species are divided into two major groups, Group A and Group B, with Group B further subdivided into seven subgroups. (b) Line chart of cluster analysis. The peak value corresponds to the optimal number of clusters for the cluster analysis.

图3 主成分分析排序图。(a)基于8个功能性状; (b)基于5个功能性状。A: 针叶树种; B1: 朝鲜槐; B2: 演替顶极阔叶树种; B3: 先锋树种; B4: 演替过渡树种; B5: 灌木; B6: 小乔木; B7: 榆科植物; LA: 叶面积; SLA: 比叶面积; LDMC: 叶干物质含量; LC: 叶碳含量; LN: 叶氮含量; C/N: 叶碳氮比; Hmax: 最大树高; WD: 木材密度。

Fig. 3 Biplots of principal component analysis. (a) Based on eight functional traits; (b) Based on five functional traits. A, Coniferous species; B1, Maackia amurensis; B2, Succession climax broadleaf species; B3, Pioneer species; B4, Succession transitional species; B5, Shrubs; B6, Small trees; B7, Ulmaceae plants. LA, Leaf area; SLA, Specific leaf area; LDMC, Leaf dry mass content; LC, Leaf carbon content; LN, Leaf nitrogen content; C/N, Leaf carbon to nitrogen ratio; Hmax, Maximum tree height; WD, Wood density.

图4 主成分分析主轴与CSR策略值相关性热图。(a)基于8个功能性状; (b)基于5个功能性状。C: 竞争型; S: 耐胁迫型; R: 杂草型; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001。

Fig. 4 Heatmap of correlations between principal components of principal component analysis (PCA) and CSR strategy scores. (a) Based on eight functional traits; (b) Based on five functional traits. C, Competitor; S, Stress tolerator; R, Ruderal; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

参考文献 77

[1]	Barba-Escoto L, Ponce-Mendoza A, García-Romero A, Calvillo-Medina RP (2019) Plant community strategies responses to recent eruptions of Popocatépetl volcano, Mexico. Journal of Vegetation Science, 30, 375-385. DOI
[2]	Burton JI, Perakis SS, McKenzie SC, Lawrence CE, Puettmann KJ (2017) Intraspecific variability and reaction norms of forest understorey plant species traits. Functional Ecology, 31, 1881-1893. DOI URL
[3]	Caccianiga M, Luzzaro A, Pierce S, Ceriani RM, Cerabolini B (2006) The functional basis of a primary succession resolved by CSR classification. Oikos, 112, 10-20. DOI URL
[4]	Cerabolini BEL, Brusa G, Ceriani RM, De Andreis R, Luzzaro A, Pierce S (2010) Can CSR classification be generally applied outside Britain? Plant Ecology, 210, 253-261. DOI URL
[5]	Charrad M, Ghazzali N, Boiteau V, Niknafs A (2014) NbClust: An R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. Journal of Statistical Software, 61, 1-36.
[6]	Chave J, Muller-Landau HC, Baker TR, Easdale TA, ter Steege H, Webb CO (2006) Regional and phylogenetic variation of wood density across 2456 neotropical tree species. Ecological Applications, 16, 2356-2367. DOI PMID
[7]	Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, Lewis SL, Swenson NG, Zanne AE (2009) Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecology Letters, 12, 351-366. DOI PMID
[8]	Chen HY, Huang YM, He KJ, Qi Y, Li EG, Jiang ZY, Sheng ZL, Li XY (2019) Temporal intraspecific trait variability drives responses of functional diversity to interannual aridity variation in grasslands. Ecology and Evolution, 9, 5731-5742. DOI URL
[9]	Cheng XY, Sun XD, Wang XY, Shang YJ, Pang XP, Li J (2024) Response of ecological strategies of noxious weeds to plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) disturbance in an alpine meadow. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 32, 2459-2468. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 程小云, 孙小丹, 王新源, 尚艺婕, 庞晓攀, 李捷 (2024) 高寒草甸主要毒杂草生态策略对高原鼠兔干扰的响应. 草地学报, 32, 2459-2468.] DOI
[10]	Coomes DA, Heathcote S, Godfrey ER, Shepherd JJ, Sack L (2008) Scaling of xylem vessels and veins within the leaves of oak species. Biology Letters, 4, 302-306. DOI PMID
[11]	Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Díaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 51, 335-380. DOI URL
[12]	de Paula LFA, Negreiros D, Azevedo LO, Fernandes RL, Stehmann JR, Silveira FAO (2015) Functional ecology as a missing link for conservation of a resource-limited flora in the Atlantic forest. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24, 2239-2253. DOI URL
[13]	De Smedt P, Ottaviani G, Wardell-Johnson G, Sýkora KV, Mucina L (2018) Habitat heterogeneity promotes intraspecific trait variability of shrub species in Australian granite inselbergs. Folia Geobotanica, 53, 133-145. DOI
[14]	Díaz S, Kattge J, Cornelissen JHC, Wright IJ, Lavorel S, Dray S, Reu B, Kleyer M, Wirth C, Colin Prentice I, Garnier E, Bönisch G, Westoby M, Poorter H, Reich PB, Moles AT, Dickie J, Gillison AN, Zanne AE, Chave J, Joseph Wright S, Sheremet’ev SN, Jactel H, Baraloto C, Cerabolini B, Pierce S, Shipley B, Kirkup D, Casanoves F, Joswig JS, Günther A, Falczuk V, Rüger N, Mahecha MD, Gorné LD (2016) The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature, 529, 167-171. DOI
[15]	Douma JC, Aerts R, Witte JPM, Bekker RM, Kunzmann D, Metselaar K, van Bodegom PM (2012) A combination of functionally different plant traits provides a means to quantitatively predict a broad range of species assemblages in NW Europe. Ecography, 35, 364-373.
[16]	Frenette-Dussault C, Shipley B, Léger JF, Meziane D, Hingrat Y (2012) Functional structure of an arid steppe plant community reveals similarities with Grime’s C-S-R theory. Journal of Vegetation Science, 23, 208-222. DOI URL
[17]	Freschet GT, Cornelissen JHC, van Logtestijn RSP, Aerts R (2010) Substantial nutrient resorption from leaves, stems and roots in a subarctic flora: What is the link with other resource economics traits? New Phytologist, 186, 879-889. DOI PMID
[18]	Fu PL, Jiang YJ, Wang AY, Brodribb TJ, Zhang JL, Zhu SD, Cao KF (2012) Stem hydraulic traits and leaf water-stress tolerance are co-ordinated with the leaf phenology of angiosperm trees in an Asian tropical dry karst forest. Annals of Botany, 110, 189-199. DOI URL
[19]	Grime JP (1974) Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature, 250, 26-31. DOI
[20]	Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. The American Naturalist, 111, 1169-1194. DOI URL
[21]	Grime JP (2001) Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
[22]	Guo WY, van Kleunen M, Winter M, Weigelt P, Stein A, Pierce S, Pergl J, Moser D, Maurel N, Lenzner B, Kreft H, Essl F, Dawson W, Pyšek P (2018) The role of adaptive strategies in plant naturalization. Ecology Letters, 21, 1380-1389. DOI URL
[23]	Hang YJ, Chen ZC, Wang L, Niu BL, Liu SS, Yu B, Wang X, Liu SR (2024) Anatomical determinants of wood density of eight broad-leaved tree species in Baotianman and their coordination and trade-off with leaf traits. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 60(4), 62-70. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 杭宇杰, 陈志成, 王林, 牛保亮, 刘松松, 于博, 王晓, 刘世荣 (2024) 宝天曼8种阔叶树木材密度的解剖学决定因素及其与叶性状的协同与权衡. 林业科学, 60(4), 62-70.]
[24]	Hao MH, Zhang ZH, Zhao SS, Zhao XH, Baiketuerhan Y, Zhang CY (2017) Habitat associations of tree growth in a coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 3437-3444. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 郝珉辉, 张忠辉, 赵珊珊, 赵秀海, 叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉, 张春雨 (2017) 吉林蛟河针阔混交林树木生长与生境的关联性. 生态学报, 37, 3437-3444.]
[25]	Hao ZQ, Zhang J, Li BH, Ye J, Wang XG, Yao XL (2008) Natural secondary poplar-birch forest in Changbai Mountain: Species composition and community structure. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 32, 251-261. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 郝占庆, 张健, 李步杭, 叶吉, 王绪高, 姚晓琳 (2008) 长白山次生杨桦林样地: 物种组成与群落结构. 植物生态学报, 32, 251-261.] DOI
[26]	He NP, Liu CC, Zhang JH, Xu L, Yu GR (2018) Perspectives and challenges in plant traits: From organs to communities. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 6787-6796. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 何念鹏, 刘聪聪, 张佳慧, 徐丽, 于贵瑞 (2018) 植物性状研究的机遇与挑战: 从器官到群落. 生态学报, 38, 6787-6796.]
[27]	He YY, Guo SL, Wang Z (2019) Research progress of trade-off relationships of plant functional traits. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 43, 1021-1035. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 何芸雨, 郭水良, 王喆 (2019) 植物功能性状权衡关系的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 43, 1021-1035.] DOI
[28]	Hodgson JG, Santini BA, Montserrat Marti G, Royo Pla F, Jones G, Bogaard A, Charles M, Font X, Ater M, Taleb A, Poschlod P, Hmimsa Y, Palmer C, Wilson PJ, Band SR, Styring A, Diffey C, Green L, Nitsch E, Stroud E, Romo-Díez A, de Torres Espuny L, Warham G (2017) Trade-offs between seed and leaf size (seed-phytomer-leaf theory): Functional glue linking regenerative with life history strategies…and taxonomy with ecology? Annals of Botany, 120, 633-652. DOI PMID
[29]	Hu ZD, Liu SR, Liu XL, Hu J, Luo MX, Li YF, Shi SL, Wu DY, Xiao JJ (2021) Soil and soil microbial biomass contents and C : N : P stoichiometry at different succession stages of natural secondary forest in sub-alpine area of western Sichuan, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 4900-4912. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 胡宗达, 刘世荣, 刘兴良, 胡璟, 罗明霞, 李亚非, 石松林, 吴德勇, 肖玖金 (2021) 川西亚高山天然次生林不同演替阶段土壤-微生物生物量及其化学计量特征. 生态学报, 41, 4900-4912.]
[30]	Jin S, Yan SJ, Huang LJ, Chen Y, Ma WW, Wang YX, Wang Z (2019) Research progress in trade-offs among leaf functional traits. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 40(5), 96-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 靳莎, 闫淑君, 黄柳菁, 陈莹, 马雯雯, 王云霄, 王喆 (2019) 植物叶功能性状间的权衡研究进展. 四川林业科技, 40(5), 96-103.]
[31]	Kabacoff R (2022) R in Action: Data analysis and Graphics with R and Tidyverse, 3rd edn. Manning Publications, Shelton.
[32]	Kattenborn T, Fassnacht FE, Pierce S, Lopatin J, Grime JP, Schmidtlein S (2017) Linking plant strategies and plant traits derived by radiative transfer modelling. Journal of Vegetation Science, 28, 717-727. DOI URL
[33]	Kazakou E, Garnier E, Navas ML, Roumet C, Collin C, Laurent G (2007) Components of nutrient residence time and the leaf economics spectrum in species from Mediterranean old-fields differing in successional status. Functional Ecology, 21, 235-245. DOI URL
[34]	Kleyer M, Minden V (2015) Why functional ecology should consider all plant organs: An allocation-based perspective. Basic and Applied Ecology, 16, 1-9. DOI URL
[35]	Laughlin DC, Leppert JJ, Moore MM, Sieg CH (2010) A multi-trait test of the leaf-height-seed plant strategy scheme with 133 species from a pine forest flora. Functional Ecology, 24, 493-501. DOI URL
[36]	Laughlin DC, Lusk CH, Bellingham PJ, Burslem DFRP, Simpson AH, Kramer-Walter KR (2017) Intraspecific trait variation can weaken interspecific trait correlations when assessing the whole-plant economic spectrum. Ecology and Evolution, 7, 8936-8949. DOI PMID
[37]	Li RH, Zhu SD, Chen HYH, John R, Zhou GY, Zhang DQ, Zhang QM, Ye Q (2015) Are functional traits a good predictor of global change impacts on tree species abundance dynamics in a subtropical forest? Ecology Letters, 18, 1181-1189.
[38]	Liang XY (2017) Leaf Functional Traits and Ecological Stoichiometry of the Dominant Tree Species along Forest Succession of Korean Pine and Broad-leaved Mixed Forest in Changbai Mountains, Northeastern China. PhD dissertation, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 梁星云 (2017) 长白山阔叶红松林演替系列主要树种叶片功能性状与化学计量学研究. 博士学位论文, 中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与自然保护研究所, 北京.]
[39]	Lin XW, Zhu JG, Xie ZB (2024) Evolution of soil quality of temperate conifer and broad-leaved mixed forests at different successional stages in Jiaohe, Jilin Province, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 43, 433-444. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[ 蔺兴武, 朱建国, 谢祖彬 (2024) 吉林蛟河不同演替阶段温带针阔混交林土壤质量演变. 生态学杂志, 43, 433-444.]
[40]	Liu C, Li S, Li JS, Guo DG, Zhang QX (2023) Spatial pattern of CSR strategies of wetland plants in Shanxi Province, China and their relationship with climate factors. Mountain Research, 41, 634-647. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 刘灿, 李帅, 李佳晟, 郭东罡, 张全喜 (2023) 山西省湿地植物CSR策略的空间分布格局及其与气候因子的关系. 山地学报, 41, 634-647.]
[41]	Liu XJ, Ma KP (2015) Research progress on plant functional traits. Scientia Sinica Vitae, 45, 325-339. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 刘晓娟, 马克平 (2015) 植物功能性状研究进展. 中国科学: 生命科学, 45, 325-339.]
[42]	Luo JX, Zang RG, Li CY (2006) Physiological and morphological variations of Picea asperata populations originating from different altitudes in the mountains of southwestern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 221, 285-290. DOI URL
[43]	Lusk CH, Laughlin DC (2017) Regeneration patterns, environmental filtering and tree species coexistence in a temperate forest. New Phytologist, 213, 657-668. DOI PMID
[44]	Martínez-Cabrera HI, Jones CS, Espino S, Schenk HJ (2009) Wood anatomy and wood density in shrubs: Responses to varying aridity along transcontinental transects. American Journal of Botany, 96, 1388-1398. DOI PMID
[45]	Moles AT, Warton DI, Warman L, Swenson NG, Laffan SW, Zanne AE, Pitman A, Hemmings FA, Leishman MR (2009) Global patterns in plant height. Journal of Ecology, 97, 923-932. DOI URL
[46]	Naeem S, Thompson LJ, Lawler SP, Lawton JH, Woodfin RM (1994) Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature, 368, 734-737. DOI
[47]	Niklas KJ (1995) Size-dependent allometry of tree height, diameter and trunk-taper. Annals of Botany, 75, 217-227. DOI URL
[48]	Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H, Barbour M, Bedward M, Bolker B, Borcard D, Borman T, Carvalho G, Chirico M, Caceres MD, Durand S, Evangelista HBA, FitzJohn R, Friendly M, Furneaux B, Hannigan G, Hill MO, Lahti L, Martino C, McGlinn D, Ouellette MH, Cunha ER, Smith T, Stier A, Braak CJFT, Weedon J (2013) Package ‘vegan’. Community Ecology Package, Version, 21-295.
[49]	Osnas JLD, Lichstein JW, Reich PB, Pacala SW (2013) Global leaf trait relationships: Mass, area, and the leaf economics spectrum. Science, 340, 741-744. DOI PMID
[50]	Ostertag R, Warman L, Cordell S, Vitousek PM (2015) Using plant functional traits to restore Hawaiian rainforest. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 805-809. DOI URL
[51]	Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret-Harte MS, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Ray P, Enrico L, Pausas JG, de Vos AC, Buchmann N, Funes G, Quétier F, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Morgan HD, ter Steege H, Sack L, Blonder B, Poschlod P, Vaieretti MV, Conti G, Staver AC, Aquino S, Cornelissen JHC (2016) Corrigendum to: New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 64, 715-716. DOI URL
[52]	Pierce S, Brusa G, Sartori M, Cerabolini BEL (2012) Combined use of leaf size and economics traits allows direct comparison of hydrophyte and terrestrial herbaceous adaptive strategies. Annals of Botany, 109, 1047-1053. DOI PMID
[53]	Pierce S, Brusa G, Vagge I, Cerabolini BEL (2013) Allocating CSR plant functional types: The use of leaf economics and size traits to classify woody and herbaceous vascular plants. Functional Ecology, 27, 1002-1010. DOI URL
[54]	Pierce S, Negreiros D, Cerabolini BEL, Kattge J, Díaz S, Kleyer M, Shipley B, Wright SJ, Soudzilovskaia NA, Onipchenko VG, van Bodegom PM, Frenette-Dussault C, Weiher E, Pinho BX, Cornelissen JHC, Grime JP, Thompson K, Hunt R, Wilson PJ, Buffa G, Nyakunga OC, Reich PB, Caccianiga M, Mangili F, Ceriani RM, Luzzaro A, Brusa G, Siefert A, Barbosa NPU, Chapin III FS, Cornwell WK, Fang JY, Fernandes GW, Garnier E, Le Stradic S, Peñuelas J, Melo FPL, Slaviero A, Tabarelli M, Tampucci D (2017) A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide. Functional Ecology, 31, 444-457. DOI URL
[55]	Pinho BX, de Melo FPL, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Pierce S, Lohbeck M, Tabarelli M (2018) Soil-mediated filtering organizes tree assemblages in regenerating tropical forests. Journal of Ecology, 106, 137-147. DOI URL
[56]	Poorter L, McDonald I, Alarcón A, Fichtler E, Licona JC, Peña-Claros M, Sterck F, Villegas Z, Sass-Klaassen U (2010) The importance of wood traits and hydraulic conductance for the performance and life history strategies of 42 rainforest tree species. New Phytologist, 185, 481-492.
[57]	Reich PB (2014) The world-wide ‘fast-slow’ plant economics spectrum: A traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology, 102, 275-301. DOI URL
[58]	Reich PB, Uhl C, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1991) Leaf lifespan as a determinant of leaf structure and function among 23 Amazonian tree species. Oecologia, 86, 16-24. DOI PMID
[59]	Rosenfield MF, Müller SC, Overbeck GE (2019) Short gradient, but distinct plant strategies: The CSR scheme applied to subtropical forests. Journal of Vegetation Science, 30, 984-993. DOI
[60]	Santiago LS (2007) Extending the leaf economics spectrum to decomposition: Evidence from a tropical forest. Ecology, 88, 1126-1131. PMID
[61]	Schmidtlein S, Feilhauer H, Bruelheide H (2012) Mapping plant strategy types using remote sensing. Journal of Vegetation Science, 23, 395-405. DOI URL
[62]	Shi SR, Qi MJ, Wang SR, Bai YF, Wang H, Wang JD, Jiang CQ (2022) Ecological strategies of main understory woody plants in the Cyclobalanopsis glauca secondary forest in west Hunan. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 42(3), 53-61. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 石朔蓉, 齐梦娟, 王书韧, 白彦峰, 王辉, 王景弟, 姜春前 (2022) 湘西青冈栎次生林林下主要木本植物的生态策略. 中南林业科技大学学报, 42(3), 53-61.]
[63]	Silvertown J (2004) Plant coexistence and the niche. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 605-611. DOI URL
[64]	Wang RZ, Huang WW, Chen L, Ma LN, Guo CY, Liu XQ (2011) Anatomical and physiological plasticity in Leymus chinensis (Poaceae) along large-scale longitudinal gradient in Northeast China. PLoS ONE, 6, e26209.
[65]	Westoby M (1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant and Soil, 199, 213-227. DOI
[66]	Xia MJ, Wang XX, Hao MH, Zhao XH, Zhang CY (2021) Distribution pattern of functional traits and its response to topographic factors in a conifer and broad-leaved mixed forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 2794-2802. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 夏梦洁, 王晓霞, 郝珉辉, 赵秀海, 张春雨 (2021) 吉林蛟河针阔混交林功能性状分布格局及其对地形因素的响应. 生态学报, 41, 2794-2802.]
[67]	Xu PC, You ZT, Ji YH, Zhou JC, Zhang QF, Zheng W, Liu XF, Lin WS, Yang ZJ, Yang YS (2019) Study on ecological strategies of 22 common woody plants in Castanopsis kawakami Nature Reserve. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 14(4), 23-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 徐鹏程, 游章湉, 纪宇皝, 周嘉聪, 张秋芳, 郑蔚, 刘小飞, 林伟盛, 杨智杰, 杨玉盛 (2019) 格氏栲自然保护区22种常见木本植物的生态策略. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 14(4), 23-29.]
[68]	Yao Z, Wu YM, You HL, Xin ZJ (2022) Research progress of plant competitor-stress tolerator-ruderal (CSR) theory and its application. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42, 24-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 姚忠, 吴永明, 游海林, 辛在军 (2022) 竞争-耐胁迫-杂草型植物对策理论及其应用研究进展. 生态学报, 42, 24-36.]
[69]	Yue LY, Zheng JQ, Han SJ, Yang JH, Geng SC, Chen ZJ, Zhang X, Gu Y (2015) Soil chemical properties and microbial community structure at different succession stages of temperate forest in Changbai Mountains. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 34, 2590-2597. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 岳琳艳, 郑俊强, 韩士杰, 杨建华, 耿世聪, 陈志杰, 张雪, 谷越 (2015) 长白山温带森林不同演替阶段土壤化学性质及微生物群落结构的变化. 生态学杂志, 34, 2590-2597.]
[70]	Yue QM, He HJ, Zhang CY, Zhao XH, Hao MH (2024) Response of trees and stand growth to cutting disturbance in Korean pine-broadleaved forests. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44, 2019-2028. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 岳庆敏, 何怀江, 张春雨, 赵秀海, 郝珉辉 (2024) 阔叶红松林林木与林分生长对采伐干扰的响应. 生态学报, 44, 2019-2028.]
[71]	Zanzottera M, Dalle Fratte M, Caccianiga M, Pierce S, Cerabolini BEL (2020) Community-level variation in plant functional traits and ecological strategies shapes habitat structure along succession gradients in alpine environment. Community Ecology, 21, 55-65. DOI
[72]	Zemunik G, Turner BL, Lambers H, Laliberté E (2015) Diversity of plant nutrient-acquisition strategies increases during long-term ecosystem development. Nature Plants, 1, 15050. DOI
[73]	Zhang XJ (2022) Naturalness in Different Successional Stages of Korean Pine Forests and Driven by Ecological Strategies and Environment. PhD dissertation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张象君 (2022) 红松林不同演替阶段的近自然度及生态策略和环境驱动. 博士学位论文, 东北林业大学, 哈尔滨.]
[74]	Zhang YS, Meiners SJ, Meng YN, Yao Q, Guo K, Guo WY, Li SP (2024) Temporal dynamics of Grime’s CSR strategies in plant communities during 60 years of succession. Ecology Letters, 27, e14446.
[75]	Zhao HC, Gao F, Li SW, Gao L, Wang MZ, Cui XY (2019) Co-accumulation characters of soil organic carbon and nitrogen under broadleaved Korean pine and Betula platyphylla secondary forests in Changbai Mountain, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 30, 1615-1624. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 赵华晨, 高菲, 李斯雯, 高雷, 王明哲, 崔晓阳 (2019) 长白山阔叶红松林和杨桦次生林土壤有机碳氮的协同积累特征. 应用生态学报, 30, 1615-1624.] DOI
[76]	Zhao XF, Xu HL, Zhang P, Tu WX, Zhang QQ (2014) Effects of nutrient and water additions on plant community structure and species diversity in desert grasslands. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 38, 167-177. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 赵新风, 徐海量, 张鹏, 涂文霞, 张青青 (2014) 养分与水分添加对荒漠草地植物群落结构和物种多样性的影响. 植物生态学报, 38, 167-177.] DOI
[77]	Zhu JY, Yu Q, Liu YP, Qin GM, Li JH, Xu CY, He WJ (2018) Response of plant functional traits and leaf economics spectrum to urban thermal environment. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 40(9), 72-81. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 朱济友, 于强, 刘亚培, 覃国铭, 李金航, 徐程扬, 何韦均 (2018) 植物功能性状及其叶经济谱对城市热环境的响应. 北京林业大学学报, 40(9), 72-81.]

基于功能性状解析东北针阔混交林主要树种的生态策略差异

Unraveling the ecological strategies of major tree species in a mixed conifer- broadleaf forest of Northeast China: Insights from functional traits

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 77

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	余德菊, 何云雲, 曹敏, 王刚, 杨洁. 基于代谢组学与转录组学技术的热带森林树种共存机制研究——以榕属植物为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(7): 24475-.
[2]	罗敏, 杨永川, 靳程, 周礼华, 龙宇潇. 重庆中心城区城市森林兽类组成特征及其对人类活动的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24402-.
[3]	罗春生, 张俊, 金华, 尹翔正, 张元明. 古尔班通古特沙漠灌木叶际细菌群落的多样性特征及其驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(12): 25340-.
[4]	张奕涵, 杨光, 周青松, 牛泽清, 朱朝东, 罗阿蓉. 蜜蜂类昆虫系统发生基因组学研究概况[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(10): 25234-.
[5]	靳川, 张子嘉, 底凯, 张卫荣, 乔栋, 程思源, 胡中民. 海南热带雨林植物光合荧光气体交换和叶功能性状数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(9): 24139-.
[6]	李艳朋, 盘李军, 陈洁, 许涵, 杨立新. 亚热带人工混交林叶功能性状对森林演替的响应规律及影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(7): 24049-.
[7]	任嘉隆, 王永珍, 冯怡琳, 赵文智, 严祺涵, 秦畅, 方静, 辛未冬, 刘继亮. 基于陷阱法采集的河西走廊戈壁荒漠甲虫数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23375-.
[8]	冯嘉谊, 练琚愉, 冯瑜莙, 张东旭, 曹洪麟, 叶万辉. 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林群落垂直分层对群落结构及功能的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(12): 24306-.
[9]	薛玉洁, 程安鹏, 李珊, 刘晓娟, 李景文. 亚热带森林中环境和物种多样性对灌木存活的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22443-.
[10]	罗彩访, 杨涛, 张秋雨, 王馨培, 沈泽昊. 滇中半湿润常绿阔叶林木本植物的功能特征和功能多样性及其影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23215-.
[11]	王健铭, 曲梦君, 王寅, 冯益明, 吴波, 卢琦, 何念鹏, 李景文. 青藏高原北部戈壁植物群落物种、功能与系统发育β多样性分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 21503-.
[12]	罗恬, 俞方圆, 练琚愉, 王俊杰, 申健, 吴志峰, 叶万辉. 冠层垂直高度对植物叶片功能性状的影响: 以鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21414-.
[13]	付飞, 魏慧玉, 常育腾, 王备新, 陈凯. 澜沧江中游水生昆虫生活史和生态学性状多样性的海拔格局: 气候和土地利用的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21332-.
[14]	林永一, 王永珍, 冯怡琳, 赵文智, 高俊伟, 刘继亮. 河西走廊中部戈壁地表甲虫群落动态变化及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(12): 22343-.
[15]	雍青措姆, 习新强, 牛克昌. 高寒草甸植物物种丧失对草原毛虫的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(11): 22069-.