生物多样性 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 25248.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025248  cstr: 32101.14.biods.2025248

所属专题: 世界生物圈保护区专题

• 世界生物圈保护区专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国的世界生物圈保护区人与自然关系评估

冯春婷1,2, 吴晨1,2, 孙熙晴1,2, 王伟1,2*   

  1. 1. 生态环境部区域生态过程与功能评估重点实验室, 中国环境科学研究院, 北京 100012; 2. 中国环境科学研究院生态研究所, 北京 100012
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-30 修回日期:2025-10-05 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-10-29
  • 通讯作者: 王伟
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(32171664)

Assessment of human–nature relationship in China’s World Biosphere Reserves

Chunting Feng1,2, Chen Wu1,2, Xiqing Sun1,2, Wei Wang1,2*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-process and Function Assessment of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China 

    2 Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

  • Received:2025-06-30 Revised:2025-10-05 Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-10-29
  • Contact: Wei Wang
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(32171664)

摘要: 世界生物圈保护区是展示和促进人与生物圈之间的平衡关系、探索人与自然和谐共生的示范区域。目前我国共有34处世界生物圈保护区, 但在全国层面世界生物圈保护区如何推动人类社会发展和自然生态保护的协同作用, 以及自然保护地的建设管理保障是否有助于推动其所在的世界生物圈保护区人与自然的关系协同发展, 仍缺少全面系统的研究。本研究首次在全国尺度, 应用人类足迹代表人类社会的发展潜力, 综合多源生态遥感数据计算生态系统质量指数, 并采用Theil-Sen Median趋势分析和Mann-Kendall检验, 对我国34处世界生物圈保护区内人与自然的关系进行了评估。基于线性回归的结果表明, 2010–2020年中国34处世界生物圈保护区生态系统质量呈上升趋势但不显著(P > 0.05), 而人类足迹呈现显著增长趋势(P < 0.05)。世界生物圈保护区范围内10%的像素单元表现为人与自然关系显著变化, 其中以协调的关系为主(占比72.2%), 尤其是在井冈山、博格达等7处世界生物圈保护区。此外, 世界生物圈保护区被自然保护地覆盖的面积占比越低、世界生物圈保护区的面积越大、加入世界生物圈保护区的时间越长, 越有利于推动世界生物圈保护区内人类社会与生态保护的协调发展。在第五届世界生物圈保护区大会于今年9月在我国杭州召开之际, 本研究为我国的世界生物圈保护区在落实人与自然和谐发展的贡献方面提供了有力支撑, 并可为全球未来的世界生物圈保护区相关研究与发展提供参考借鉴。

关键词: 人与生物圈计划, 人类足迹, 生态系统质量指数, 人与自然协调发展, 自然保护地

Abstract

Background & Aims: World Biosphere Reserves are designated demonstration areas to promote a balanced relationship between humans and the biosphere, exploring pathways for harmonious coexistence between human societies and natural ecosystems. China currently has 34 World Biosphere Reserves. However, there remains a lack of comprehensive and systematic research at the national level regarding how these reserves can effectively drive the coordinated development of human society and ecological conservation. Additionally, it is unclear whether the logistic support functions of protected areas contribute meaningfully to fostering sustainable human–nature relationships within these reserves.

Methods: This study integrated comprehensive spatial data from all 34 World Biosphere Reserves in China and their associated protected areas. By combining human footprint indicators, ecological remote sensing datasets to calculate ecosystem quality index, as well as trend detection methods including Theil-Sen Median slope estimation and Mann-Kendall analysis, we evaluated the relationship between human social development and natural ecological protection at a 1 km × 1 km pixel resolution within these reserves.

Results: Linear regression results indicated that ecosystem quality across China’s 34 World Biosphere Reserves increased from 2010 to 2020, although the trend was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In contrast, human footprint exhibited a statistically significant upward trend during the same period (P < 0.05). Within these reserves, 10% of the pixel units demonstrated significant changes in human–nature relationships, with coordination interactions accounting for the largest proportion (72.2%), particularly evident in seven reserves including Jinggangshan and Bogda, etc. Furthermore, a lower coverage ratio of protected areas within a World Biosphere Reserve, a larger total area of the World Biosphere Reserve, and a longer duration since its designation as a World Biosphere Reserve are all associated with enhanced coordination between human development and ecological conservation.

Conclusion: With the upcoming Fifth World Congress of Biosphere Reserves to be held in Hangzhou, China in September 2025, this study offers robust scientific support for understanding the role of China’s World Biosphere Reserves in advancing harmonious development between human society and nature. Furthermore, it provides valuable insights and references for future global research and sustainable management of World Biosphere Reserves.

Key words: Man and the Biosphere Programme (MAB), human footprint, ecosystem quality index, coordinated development of human and nature, protected areas