生物多样性 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 21372.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021372

• 生态保护红线专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态保护红线战略视域下自然保护地如何划界和分区管控?

吴必虎1,*(), 谢冶凤1, 李奕2, 丛丽2   

  1. 1.北京大学城市与环境学院, 北京 100871
    2.北京林业大学园林学院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-14 接受日期:2022-01-23 出版日期:2022-04-20 发布日期:2022-02-28
  • 通讯作者: 吴必虎
  • 作者简介:*E-mail: tigerwu@urban.pku.edu.cn

How to delineate and zone protected areas under the scope of ecological conservation redline strategy

Bihu Wu1,*(), Yefeng Xie1, Yi Li2, Li Cong2   

  1. 1 College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871
    2 College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083
  • Received:2021-09-14 Accepted:2022-01-23 Online:2022-04-20 Published:2022-02-28
  • Contact: Bihu Wu

摘要:

本文在生态保护红线战略背景下, 探讨自然保护地如何通过合理划界、分区管控及相应管理措施来处理人地关系。主要观点包括: 在国家生态保护红线战略指导下开展自然保护地边界划定及分区管控, 不仅是单一的自然科学问题, 同时也是多目标管理问题; 生态保护红线并不仅是一条静态物理空间划线, 而且也是生态系统动态管控的基线(baseline); 在生态保护红线战略思想下, 自然保护地分区管控需要考虑地理差异性, 应因地制策、因时施策。生态保护红线内区域的人地关系的处理需要明确保护地可建设范围、科学许可自然资源可利用方式, 应当对保护地的生态系统特征进行研究, 充分论证其对人类活动的承受能力, 在保护自然生态系统的前提下, 最终将人类活动控制在生态系统稳定性可以接受的“基线”之内。

关键词: 自然保护地, 生态保护红线, 地理差异性

Abstract

Background & Aim: Under the scope of China’s ecological conservation redline strategy, this article focuses on how to handle the relationship between man and land in protected areas (PAs) by sound delineation and zoning, and adaptive management based on them. To understand the current status of China’s ecological conservation redline strategy and its major implementing area, i.e. protected areas, we collected and comprehensively analyzed the policies and literature regarding the topics of ecological conservation redline and PA governance.

Results: (1) As a part of ecological conservation redline areas, PA’s delineation and zoning is not only a single natural scientific issue, but also a multi-objective; (2) The ecological conservation redline is not only a static physical space line but also a baseline for the dynamic control of the ecosystem; (3) Under the scope of ecological conservation redline strategy, PA’s delineation and zoning needs to consider geographical differentiation and should be based on local and time-based policies.

Conclusion: The handling of the human‒land relationship within ecological conservation redline needs to clarify the development permission of PAs and scientifically concession uses of natural resources. The ecosystem characteristics of PAs should be studied to fully demonstrate their ability to withstand human activities under the premise of conserving the natural ecology. In this way, human activities will ultimately be controlled within the acceptable “baseline” of the stability of the ecosystem.

Key words: protected area, ecological conservation redlines, geographical differentiation