生物多样性 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 24441.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024441  cstr: 32101.14.biods.2024441

• 保护与治理对策 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国植物园体系如何更好地践行植物多样性保护?

金冬梅1#, 何拓2#, 董晖2, 马其侠1, 胡永红1*   

  1. 1. 上海辰山植物园, 上海 201602; 2. 国家林业和草原局野生动物保护监测中心, 北京 100714
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-11 修回日期:2024-11-27 接受日期:2024-12-05 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 胡永红

Conserving plant diversity: The role of a botanical garden network in China

Dongmei Jin1#, Tuo He2#, Hui Dong2, Qixia Ma1, Yonghong Hu1*   

  1. 1 Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China 

    2 Wildlife Conservation Monitoring Center, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100714, China

  • Received:2024-10-11 Revised:2024-11-27 Accepted:2024-12-05 Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-04-28
  • Contact: Yonghong Hu

摘要: 人类活动、气候变化等因素引起的全球植物多样性丧失已严重威胁人类的生存与发展。在全球范围内, 植物园已经成为植物多样性研究与保护的重要力量。当前我国正在建设国家植物园体系, 旨在加强对野生植物的系统收集、科学保护、高水平研究和可持续利用。本研究全面调查、收集并分析了我国170座植物园的发展历史、隶属关系、人员构成及成果产出等信息, 以期在全面了解植物园基本情况的前提下,为我国植物园体系的发展提供建议。调研结果显示: 我国植物园90%属于公益性事业单位; 隶属于中国科学院的植物园科研实力突出, 隶属于政府部门的植物园在迁地保护、科普、游憩等方面贡献较大但科研实力较弱; 植物园之间缺乏实质性合作, 影响了整体成效。提出如下建议: 立足国家植物园体系, 覆盖本土、辐射全球; 建设植物多样性保护网络, 通过信息化与标准化加强统筹合作; 引入植物园认证、创新运营模式, 提升可持续性。未来, 期待构建科学、系统、完善的植物园体系, 更好地保护植物多样性, 实现可持续发展。

关键词: 国家植物园, 迁地保护, 信息化, 标准化, 保护网络, 可持续发展

Abstract

Aims: Global plant diversity has declined in recent decades, primarily due to human activities and climate change, posing a threat to human existence. In this context, botanical gardens have played a vital role in the research and protection of plant diversity. In China, a system of national botanical gardens is being developed to collect, protect, and study wild plants, thereby promoting their sustainable use. To support this effort, the goal of our paper is to analyze the current state of knowledge on botanical gardens in China and identify effective strategies for plant diversity conservation. 

Methods: To accomplish this goal, we collected data from 170 botanical gardens located in China. General data included year of establishment, affiliations, and staff structure, while performance outcomes focused on conservation, research, education, horticulture, and amenities. These data were used to categorize the gardens into levels A through D, with Level A representing the highest level of performance and Level D the lowest. 

Results: Our analyses revealed that 90% of botanical gardens in China are government-sponsored, public welfare institutions. Notably, gardens affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences were the leading contributors to scientific research. While gardens managed by government administrations made significant contributions to conservation, horticulture, education, and recreation, their research capacities were less developed. Lastly, the limited collaboration among gardens hindered their overall impact. 

Conclusion: To bridge this gap, we propose three main strategies. First, establish a connected system of national, regional, and local botanical gardens to facilitate collaborative efforts in protecting China’s native flora and contributing to global plant conservation. Second, construct an integrated information facility for plant conservation, leveraging digitalization and standardization to strengthen cooperation among gardens. Finally, introduce botanical garden accreditation and innovative operational models to ensure long-term sustainability. We believe that these recommendations will enhance the efficiency of plant diversity conservation and contribute to sustainable development.

Key words: national botanical gardens, ex situ conservation, digitalization, standardization, conservation network, sustainable development