甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区林缘社区饲养犬只对大熊猫时空节律的影响

doi:10.17520/biods.2021204

生物多样性 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 21204. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021204 cstr: 32101.14.biods.2021204

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区林缘社区饲养犬只对大熊猫时空节律的影响

滕继荣¹, 刘兴明¹, 何礼文¹, 王钧亮¹, 黄建², 冯杰², 王放³^,^*(), 翁悦³^,^*()

1.甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区, 甘肃陇南 756400
2.山水自然保护中心, 北京 100871
3.复旦大学生命科学学院生物多样性与生态工程教育部重点实验室, 上海 200438

收稿日期:2021-05-20 接受日期:2021-09-30 出版日期:2022-01-20 发布日期:2022-01-29
通讯作者: 王放,翁悦
作者简介:* 共同通讯作者. E-mail: wfang@fudan.edu.cn;19210700158@fudan.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31971537)

The spatio-temporal impact of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) on giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve

Jirong Teng¹, Xingming Liu¹, Liwen He¹, Junliang Wang¹, Jian Huang², Jie Feng², Fang Wang³^,^*(), Yue Weng³^,^*()

1 Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve, Longnan, Gansu 756400
2 Shan Shui Conservation Center, Beijing 100871
3 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438

Received:2021-05-20 Accepted:2021-09-30 Online:2022-01-20 Published:2022-01-29
Contact: Fang Wang,Yue Weng

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

人类对于野生动物的影响复杂多样, 其中家养动物所产生的干扰往往被忽视, 例如保护区林缘社区饲养的家犬。半散放的家犬(Canis familiaris)进入野生动物栖息地, 对保护区内以大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)为代表的野生动物可能产生重要影响。为明确家犬进入林区活动范围对大熊猫的影响, 本研究采用红外相机技术和GPS项圈无线追踪技术对甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区内家犬对大熊猫潜在栖息地范围和时间节律的影响进行研究, 利用MaxEnt模型对家犬活动范围及大熊猫潜在栖息地进行预测。结果表明: 甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区内大熊猫潜在栖息地面积为885.8 km², 约占保护区总面积的48.2%; 家犬活动面积为861.2 km², 约占保护区总面积的47.6%。家犬活动范围与大熊猫潜在栖息地重叠的面积约占保护区面积的28.2%, 且多集中在低海拔的常绿阔叶林。大熊猫在有家犬出现的位点和没有家犬出现的位点日活动节律具有显著差异。本研究揭示了家犬进入林区对大熊猫栖息地潜在影响的空间范围, 为保护区开展生物多样性管理提供了关键信息, 对于其他保护区具有借鉴意义。

关键词: 大熊猫, 家犬, 栖息地, 红外相机, MaxEnt模型

Abstract

Aims: Anthropogenic interferences have various forms such as domestic animals, in which many have significant negative impacts but are consistently ignored in conservation planning. Most domestic dogs in Baishuijiang live with humans but act as semi-feral dogs since they are allowed to enter forests, including nature reserve, during most of the year (except for planting periods). During these periods of freedom, their home range, activity pattern, and most importantly, interaction with wild animals, remains unknown. To fill this knowledge gap, we chose the giant panda to study the response of wildlife to free-ranging dogs due to the spatial overlap of domestic dogs and giant pandas in Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve. Our objective was to: (1) track the extent of dog movements in and around nature reserve, and (2) evaluate the percent area of nature reserve where giant panda may come in contact with domestic dogs.

Methods: To understand the extent of the impact free-range domestic dogs have on giant pandas, we used infrared cameras and GPS collars to study the repercussions of domestic dogs entering nature reserve and affecting the wildlife. We also constructed a MaxEnt model to estimate the spatial overlap of domestic dogs and giant pandas in Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve.

Results: The suitable habitat for giant pandas in nature reserve is 885.8 km², around 48.2% of the overall area, while the area of domestic dog distribution is 861.2 km², or 47.6% of the nature reserve. The overlap between domestic dogs and giant panda habitat is 28.2% of the entire nature reserve. There are significant differences in activity rhythms of giant pandas between sites with and without dog detection.

Conclusion: These results indicate the extent to which the trespassing of domestic dogs has affected giant pandas. The negative impact of residential areas could result in a combination of human activities (e.g., poaching, farming, livestock grazing, automobile traffic), requiring distinctive solutions to eliminate. We suggest any major residents close to nature reserves should restrain dogs at residences. Taking account for the effects of dog’s movements and habitat use in the nature reserve is essential for a comprehensive conservation framework.

Key words: giant panda, domestic dog, habitat, camera trap, MaxEnt model

滕继荣, 刘兴明, 何礼文, 王钧亮, 黄建, 冯杰, 王放, 翁悦 (2022) 甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区林缘社区饲养犬只对大熊猫时空节律的影响. 生物多样性, 30, 21204. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021204.

Jirong Teng, Xingming Liu, Liwen He, Junliang Wang, Jian Huang, Jie Feng, Fang Wang, Yue Weng (2022) The spatio-temporal impact of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) on giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science, 30, 21204. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021204.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2021204

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2022/V30/I1/21204

图/表 5

图1 甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区大熊猫探测位点分布图

Fig. 1 Distribution of giant panda detection sites in Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve

图2 基于红外相机位点数据计算出的白水江国家级自然保护区大熊猫栖息地范围

Fig. 2 The estimated habitat range of giant panda across Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve based on the camera stations

图3 基于18只家犬的GPS项圈数据计算的白水江国家级自然保护区的家犬活动范围

Fig. 3 The estimated distribution of dogs across Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve based on the tracking movements of 18 dogs

图4 白水江国家级自然保护区家犬活动范围与大熊猫栖息地重叠区域

Fig. 4 The overlap between dogs’ home range and giant pandas’ distributions in Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve

图5 大熊猫在无家犬探测点(黑色实线)和有家犬探测点(蓝色虚线)的日节律活动。P < 0.05表明有显著性差异。

Fig. 5 Species’ daily activity between sites which dog absence (black continuous curves) and dog appearance (blue curves). Significant relationships (P < 0.05) are indicated by asterisks.

参考文献 35

[1]	Anderson RP, Gonzalez IJ (2011) Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with Maxent. Ecological Modelling, 222, 2796-2811. DOI URL
[2]	Cao Y, DeWalt RE, Robinson JL, Tweddale T, Hinz L, Pessino M (2013) Using Maxent to model the historic distributions of stonefly species in Illinois streams: The effects of regularization and threshold selections. Ecological Modelling, 259, 30-39. DOI URL
[3]	D’Eon RG, Delparte D (2005) Effects of radio-collar position and orientation on GPS radio-collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 383-388. DOI URL
[4]	Doherty TS, Glen AS, Nimmo DG, Ritchie EG, Dickman CR (2016) Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 11261-11265.
[5]	Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A (2010) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29, 129-151. DOI URL
[6]	Feng N (2017) Epidemiological Investigation and Experimental Immune Study on Canine Distemper in Giant Panda. PhD dissertation, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 冯娜 (2017) 大熊猫犬瘟热流行病学调查与实验免疫研究. 博士学位论文, 吉林农业大学, 长春.]
[7]	Fiske I, Chandler R (2011) Unmarked: An R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software, 43, 1-23.
[8]	Frair JL, Nielsen SE, Merrill EH, Lele SR, Boyce MS, Munro RHM, Stenhouse GB, Beyer HL (2004) Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studies. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 201-212. DOI URL
[9]	Gehrt SD, Wilson EC, Brown JL, Anchor C (2013) Population ecology of free-roaming cats and interference competition by coyotes in urban parks. PLoS ONE, 8, e75718. DOI URL
[10]	Gong MH, Ouyang ZY, Xu WH, Song YL, Dai B (2015) The location of wildlife corridors under the impact of road disturbance: Case study of a giant panda conservation corridor. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35, 3447-3453. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 龚明昊, 欧阳志云, 徐卫华, 宋延龄, 戴波 (2015) 道路影响下野生动物廊道的选址--以大熊猫保护廊道为例. 生态学报, 35, 3447-3453.]
[11]	He K, Dai Q, Gu XH, Zhang ZJ, Zhou J, Qi DW, Gu XD, Yang XY, Zhang W, Yang B, Yang ZS (2019) Effects of roads on giant panda distribution: A mountain range scale evaluation. Scientific Reports, 9, 1110. DOI URL
[12]	Hughes J, MacDonald DW (2013) A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological Conservation, 157, 341-351. DOI URL
[13]	Jin YP, Zhang XK, Ma YS, Qiao YC, Liu XB, Zhao KH, Zhang CL, Lin DG, Fu XL, Xu XR, Wang YW, Wang HN (2017) Canine distemper viral infection threatens the giant panda population in China. Oncotarget, 8, 113910-113919. DOI URL
[14]	Kang DW (2021) A review of the impacts of four identified major human disturbances on the habitat and habitat use of wild giant pandas from 2015 to 2020. Science of the total Environment, 763, 142975. DOI URL
[15]	Kennedy B, Brown W, Vernes K, Körtner G, Butler J (2018) Dog and cat interactions in a remote aboriginal community. Animals, 8, 65. DOI URL
[16]	Lacerda ACR, Tomas WM, Marinho-Filho J (2009) Domestic dogs as an edge effect in the Brasília National Park, Brazil: Interactions with native mammals. Animal Conservation, 12, 477-487. DOI URL
[17]	Linkie M, Ridout MS (2011) Assessing tiger-prey interactions in Sumatran rainforests. Journal of Zoology, 284, 224-229. DOI URL
[18]	Liu XH, Wu PF, Shao XM, Songer M, Cai Q, Zhu Y, He XB (2017) Spatiotemporally monitoring forest landscape for giant panda habitat through a high learning-sensitive neural network in Guanyinshan Nature Reserve in the Qinling Mountains, China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76, 1-12. DOI URL
[19]	McShea WJ, Forrester T, Costello R, He ZH, Kays R (2016) Volunteer-run cameras as distributed sensors for macrosystem mammal research. Landscape Ecology, 31, 55-66. DOI URL
[20]	Meek PD (1999) The movement, roaming behaviour and home range of free-roaming domestic dogs, Canis lupus familiaris, in coastal New South Wales. Wildlife Research, 26, 847- 855. DOI URL
[21]	Parsons AW, Bland C, Forrester T, Baker-Whatton MC, Schuttler SG, McShea WJ, Costello R, Kays R (2016) The ecological impact of humans and dogs on wildlife in protected areas in eastern North America. Biological Conservation, 203, 75-88. DOI URL
[22]	Paschoal AMO, Massara RL, Bailey LL, Kendall WL, Doherty PF Jr, Hirsch A, Chiarello AG, Paglia AP (2016) Use of Atlantic Forest protected areas by free-ranging dogs: Estimating abundance and persistence of use. Ecosphere, 7, 1- 15.
[23]	Rong ZL, Liu XM, Zhao CY, He LW, Liu JJ, Gao YF, Zang F, Xu HJ, Guo ZX, Mao YH (2019) Evaluating giant panda as a surrogate species for conservation co-occurring species in the Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 8939-8948. DOI URL
[24]	Silva-Rodríguez EA, Ortega-Solís GR, Jiménez JE (2010) Conservation and ecological implications of the use of space by Chilla foxes and free-ranging dogs in a human-dominated landscape in southern Chile. Austral Ecology, 35, 765-777. DOI URL
[25]	Tobler MW, Carrillo-Percastegui SE, Leite Pitman R, Mares R, Powell G (2008) An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation, 11, 169-178. DOI URL
[26]	Vanak AT, Gompper ME (2009) Dogs (Canis familiaris) as carnivores: Their role and function in intraguild competition. Mammal Review, 39, 265-283. DOI URL
[27]	Wang H, Liu XM, Zhao CY, Chang YP, Liu YY, Zang F (2021) Spatial-temporal pattern analysis of landscape ecological risk assessment based on land use/land cover change in Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve in Gansu Province, China. Ecological Indicators, 124, 107454. DOI URL
[28]	Wei FW (2016) Research progress in conservation biology of endangered mammals in China. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 36, 255-269. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 魏辅文 (2016) 我国濒危哺乳动物保护生物学研究进展. 兽类学报, 36, 255-269.]
[29]	Weston MA, Fitzsimons JA, Wescott G, Miller KK, Ekanayake KB, Schneider T (2014) Bark in the park: A review of domestic dogs in parks. Environmental Management, 54, 373-382. DOI URL
[30]	White PCL, Ward AI (2010) Interdisciplinary approaches for the management of existing and emerging human-wildlife conflicts. Wildlife Research, 37, 623-629. DOI URL
[31]	Young JK, Olson KA, Reading RP, Amgalanbaatar S, Berger J (2011) Is wildlife going to the dogs? Impacts of feral and free-roaming dogs on wildlife populations. BioScience, 61, 125-132. DOI URL
[32]	Zhang JD (2017) The research progress of the effects of human and natural disturbance on giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Journal of China West Normal University (Natural Sciences), 38, 227-233. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张晋东 (2017) 人类与自然干扰对大熊猫影响的研究进展. 西华师范大学学报(自然科学版), 38, 227- 233.]
[33]	Zhang JJ, Jiang F, Li GY, Qin W, Li SQ, Gao HM, Cai ZY, Lin GH, Zhang TZ (2019) Maxent modeling for predicting the spatial distribution of three raptors in the Sanjiangyuan National Park, China. Ecology and Evolution, 9, 6643-6654. DOI URL
[34]	Zhang YK, Wu YJ, Zhang QY, Ran JH, Price M (2018) Distribution of a giant panda population influenced by land cover. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 82, 1199-1209. DOI URL
[35]	Zhao Y, Chen YP, Ellison AM, Liu WG, Chen D (2019) Establish an environmentally sustainable giant panda national park in the Qinling Mountains. Science of the total Environment, 668, 979-987. DOI

甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区林缘社区饲养犬只对大熊猫时空节律的影响

The spatio-temporal impact of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) on giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	康燕干靓俞霖琳何晨静张理卿吴婧彬. 基于自然解决方案的城市小微栖息地营造与网络构建模式：以上海市长宁区生境花园为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24528-.
[2]	罗敏, 杨永川, 靳程, 周礼华, 龙宇潇. 城市森林兽类组成特征及人类活动的影响——以重庆中心城区为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24402-.
[3]	张明燡, 王晓梅, 郑言鑫, 吴楠, 李东浩, 樊恩源, 李娜, 单秀娟, 于涛, 赵春暖, 李波, 徐帅, 吴玉萍, 任利群. 黄河口典型牡蛎礁分布区资源状况和栖息地功能[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 24208-.
[4]	付梦娣, 朱彦鹏, 任月恒, 李爽, 秦乐, 谢正君, 王清春, 张立博. 新疆野生动物通道空间布局优化[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24346-.
[5]	龚翠凤, 韦伟, 罗概, 韩一敏, 吴鹏程, 何梦楠, 闵清悦, 付强, 陈鹏. 大熊猫国家公园崇州片区有蹄类动物空间分布及共存关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24260-.
[6]	王大伟, 程帅, 冯佳伟, 王天明. 东北地区张广才岭2015-2020年野生动物红外相机监测数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(2): 24384-.
[7]	卢佳玉, 石小亿, 多立安, 王天明, 李治霖. 基于红外相机技术的天津城市地栖哺乳动物昼夜活动节律评价[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(8): 23369-.
[8]	王秦韵, 张玉泉, 刘浩, 李明, 刘菲, 赵宁, 陈鹏, 齐敦武, 阙品甲. 成都大熊猫繁育研究基地鸟类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(8): 24066-.
[9]	苏荣菲, 陈睿山, 俞霖琳, 吴婧彬, 康燕. 基于红外相机调查的上海市长宁区社区生境花园生物多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(8): 24068-.
[10]	李佳琪, 冯一迪, 王蕾, 潘盆艳, 刘潇如, 李雪阳, 王怡涵, 王放. 上海城市环境中貉的食性分析及家域范围内的栖息地选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(8): 24131-.
[11]	高翔, 潘淑芳, 孙争争, 李霁筱, 高天雨, 董路, 王宁. 广东珠海凤凰山和淇澳岛小灵猫的分布与活动节律[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(8): 24045-.
[12]	张明军, 王合升, 颜文博, 符运南, 王琦, 曾治高. 海南大田国家级自然保护区小灵猫的活动节律与栖息地选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 23420-.
[13]	麦晓烔, 康佳, 李梓琛, 王天明. 东北虎豹国家公园梅花鹿活动节律及其对道路的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(11): 24178-.
[14]	楼晨阳, 任海保, 陈小南, 米湘成, 童冉, 朱念福, 陈磊, 吴统贵, 申小莉. 钱江源国家公园森林群落的物种多样性、结构多样性及其对黑麂出现概率的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22518-.
[15]	赵坤明, 陈圣宾, 杨锡福. 基于红外相机技术调查四川都江堰破碎化森林鸟兽多样性及优势种活动节律[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22529-.