生物多样性 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 340-350. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020171
收稿日期:
2020-04-26
接受日期:
2020-09-06
出版日期:
2021-03-20
发布日期:
2020-11-03
通讯作者:
闻丞
作者简介:
E-mail: 82335884@qq.com#共同第一作者
基金资助:
Yue Huang1, Yiyun Gu2, Wenrui Yang3, Cheng Wen2,4,5,*()
Received:
2020-04-26
Accepted:
2020-09-06
Online:
2021-03-20
Published:
2020-11-03
Contact:
Cheng Wen
About author:
First author contact:#Co-first authors
摘要:
实现有效生物多样性保护的关键在于提升生物多样性丰富的人口密集区的保护效率。北京人口密集且生物多样性丰富, 存在3类具有生态保护功能的区划——自然保护区、生态保护红线和限制建设线。上述区域可视为生态保护潜力区。本文以在北京有分布的30种受胁鸟类为主要对象, 探讨现有生态保护潜力区对这些物种栖息地的覆盖程度, 并对如何改善上述受胁鸟类栖息地的保护状况进行了建议。根据物种对栖息地的选择, 基于高分辨率卫星解译的土地利用类型图, 利用最大熵模型(MaxEnt)掩膜栖息地分布图, 得到各受胁鸟类的预测空间分布。叠加这些分布获得北京受胁鸟类丰富度分布格局并进行验证。依据物种丰富度高低, 将受胁鸟类栖息地划分为一至四级(最重要的栖息地是一级栖息地, 以此类推)。同时, 依据地表覆盖类型和人类活动强度高低将北京市域划分为城市建成区、乡村生境区和自然生境区。分别计算3类保护潜力区对上述3类区域以及四级栖息地的覆盖面积比例。结果表明: (1) 95.64%的一级关键栖息地和86.32%的二级关键栖息地分布在乡村生境区, 但仅有0.69%和15.15%的乡村生境区分别被自然保护区和生态保护红线覆盖; (2)未受到自然保护区和生态保护红线覆盖的一、二级关键栖息地主要为水域和沼泽地等湿地、高覆盖度草地和部分耕地, 以及含有较高比例水体的大型城市绿地。基于以上结果, 我们建议至少在一定区域内试行如下保护措施: (1)严格保护湿地及其周边的高覆盖度草地, 确保面积不减少; (2)维持基本农田规模和粮食种植模式; (3)将乡村生境区位于河道附近的水域、沼泽地、高覆盖草地和灌木林纳入生态保护红线范围; (4)在公园绿地中划定生物多样性保护区; (5)优化平原地区林地结构。以上措施将使北京的受胁鸟类栖息地得到更好保护, 为中国东部人口密集区生物多样性保护提供示范。
黄越, 顾燚芸, 阳文锐, 闻丞 (2021) 如何在北京充分实现受胁鸟类栖息地保护?. 生物多样性, 29, 340-350. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020171.
Yue Huang, Yiyun Gu, Wenrui Yang, Cheng Wen (2021) How to best preserve the irreplaceable habitats of threatened birds in Beijing?. Biodiversity Science, 29, 340-350. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020171.
图2 北京市域受胁鸟类栖息地空间分布(其位于城市建成区、乡村生境区和自然生境区的比例分别是4.49%、81.14%和14.37%)
Fig. 2 The distribution map of the habitats of threatened birds in Beijing. The coverage ratio of the habitats of threatened birds to urban, rural and natural areas was 4.49%, 81.14%, and 14.37%, respectively.
图3 北京市域受胁鸟类丰富度的空间分布格局。一级关键栖息地分别是: 1: 密云水库; 2: 官厅水库; 3: 怀柔水库; 4: 十三陵水库; 5: 沙河水库; 6: 崇青水库; 7: 海子水库; 8: 大宁水库及其周边的滩地;9: 潮白河; 10: 温榆河; 11: 永定河; 12: 大石河; 13: 拒马河; 14: 泃河; 15: 妫水河等河渠;16: 颐和园; 17: 圆明园; 18: 奥林匹克森林公园; 19: 朝阳公园; 20: 玉渊潭公园; 21: 中南海、北海和后海; 22: 龙潭西湖公园; 23: 麋鹿苑; 24: 汉石桥湿地市级自然保护区; 25: 白浮泉公园; 26: 翠湖国家城市湿地公园等城市绿地水体。
Fig. 3 A map of richness pattern of 30 threatened bird species and the habitat classification. The 1st level key habitats are as follows. 1, Miyun Reservoir; 2, Guanting Reservoir; 3, Huairou Reservoir; 4, Shisanling Reservoir; 5, Shahe Reservoir; 6, Chongqing Reservoir; 7, Haizi Reservoir; 8, Daning Reservoir; 9, Chaobai River; 10, Wenyu River; 11, Yongding River; 12, Dashi River; 13, Juma River; 14, Juhe River; 15 Guishui River; waters in urban green spaces, 16, The Summer Palace; 17, The Yuanmingyuan Park; 18, Olympic Forest Park; 19, Chaoyang Park; 20, Yuyuantan Park; 21, Zhongnanhai, Beihai and Houhai; 22, Longtan West Lake Park; 23, Miluyuan Park; 24, Hanshiqiao Municipal Wetland Nature Reserve; 25, Baifuquan Park; 26, Cuihu National Urban Wetland Park.
分区 Types of landscape | 一级关键栖息地 The 1st level key habitats | 二级关键栖息地 The 2nd level key habitats | 三级栖息地 The 3rd level habitats | 四级栖息地 The 4th level habitats |
---|---|---|---|---|
城市建成区 Urban area | 1.87% | 10.61% | 2.98% | 4.88% |
乡村生境区 Rural area | 95.64% | 86.32% | 95.64% | 74.72% |
自然生境区 Natural area | 2.49% | 3.06% | 1.37% | 20.40% |
北京市域 The whole area of Beijing | 1.52% | 1.10% | 7.08% | 20.33% |
表1 受胁鸟类各级栖息地在城市建成区、乡村生境区和自然生境区的分布比例及其占市域面积的比例
Table 1 The coverage ratio of the habitats of threatened bird to urban, rural and natural areas and the whole area of Beijing
分区 Types of landscape | 一级关键栖息地 The 1st level key habitats | 二级关键栖息地 The 2nd level key habitats | 三级栖息地 The 3rd level habitats | 四级栖息地 The 4th level habitats |
---|---|---|---|---|
城市建成区 Urban area | 1.87% | 10.61% | 2.98% | 4.88% |
乡村生境区 Rural area | 95.64% | 86.32% | 95.64% | 74.72% |
自然生境区 Natural area | 2.49% | 3.06% | 1.37% | 20.40% |
北京市域 The whole area of Beijing | 1.52% | 1.10% | 7.08% | 20.33% |
保护潜力区 PAC | 北京市域 Whole area of Beijing | 城市建成区 Urban area | 乡村生境区 Rural area | 自然生境区 Natural area |
---|---|---|---|---|
自然保护区 Natural reserve | 4.51% | 0.17% | 0.69% | 9.46% |
生态保护红线 Ecological protection red line | 26.83% | 0.65% | 15.15% | 44.77% |
限制建设线 Construction control line | 74.40% | 4.93% | 63.20% | 99.50% |
表2 三类保护潜力区占北京市域比例及对城市建成区、乡村和自然生境区覆盖比例
Table 2 The coverage ratio of three categories of potential areas for conservation (PAC) to the whole area of Beijing, urban, rural and natural areas
保护潜力区 PAC | 北京市域 Whole area of Beijing | 城市建成区 Urban area | 乡村生境区 Rural area | 自然生境区 Natural area |
---|---|---|---|---|
自然保护区 Natural reserve | 4.51% | 0.17% | 0.69% | 9.46% |
生态保护红线 Ecological protection red line | 26.83% | 0.65% | 15.15% | 44.77% |
限制建设线 Construction control line | 74.40% | 4.93% | 63.20% | 99.50% |
保护潜力区 PAC | 一级关键栖息地 1st level key habitats | 二级关键栖 息地 2nd level key habitats | 三级栖息地 3rd level habitats | 四级栖息地 4th level habitats |
---|---|---|---|---|
自然保护区 Natural reserve | 9.01% | 1.66% | 0.39% | 5.73% |
生态保护红线 Ecological protection red line | 59.82% | 31.40% | 3.83% | 19.48% |
限制建设线 Construction control line | 75.67% | 56.56% | 68.87% | 69.73% |
表3 三类保护潜力区对各级栖息地的保护比例
Table 3 The coverage ratio of three categories of potential areas for conservation (PAC) to the four levels of habitats
保护潜力区 PAC | 一级关键栖息地 1st level key habitats | 二级关键栖 息地 2nd level key habitats | 三级栖息地 3rd level habitats | 四级栖息地 4th level habitats |
---|---|---|---|---|
自然保护区 Natural reserve | 9.01% | 1.66% | 0.39% | 5.73% |
生态保护红线 Ecological protection red line | 59.82% | 31.40% | 3.83% | 19.48% |
限制建设线 Construction control line | 75.67% | 56.56% | 68.87% | 69.73% |
图4 未被自然保护区和生态保护红线覆盖的受胁鸟类栖息地空间分布
Fig. 4 The distribution map of the habitats of threatened birds uncovered by nature reserves and the ecological protection red line
一类栖息地 Habitat I | 二类栖息地 Habitat II | 一级关键栖息地 1st level key habitats | 二级关键栖息地 2nd level key habitats | 三级栖息地 3rd level habitats | 四级栖息地 4th level habitats |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水域 Waters | 河渠 River | 0.600 | 33.434 | 8.409 | 17.644 |
湖泊 Lake | 16.765 | 1.884 | 0.162 | 0.783 | |
水库 Reservoir | 7.720 | 0.345 | 0.054 | 3.853 | |
坑塘 Pool | 39.389 | 9.231 | 1.167 | 3.940 | |
滩地 Shallows | 3.205 | 1.152 | 0.184 | 0.597 | |
耕地 Farmlands | 水田 Paddy field | 0.002 | 0.022 | 0.483 | 0.050 |
旱地 Dry farmland | 1.489 | 6.941 | 984.528 | 174.111 | |
林地 Woodlands | 灌木林 Shrub land | 0.138 | 0.192 | 21.947 | 37.895 |
疏林地 Open forest | 0.092 | 0.236 | 0.274 | 33.018 | |
有林地 Woodland | 2.716 | 8.152 | 32.228 | 1,479.720 | |
其他林地 Other woodland | 0.564 | 0.612 | 4.678 | 319.142 | |
草地 Grasslands | 高覆盖度草地 Grassland with high coverage | 19.786 | 39.669 | 1.054 | 15.808 |
中覆盖度草地 Grassland with medium coverage | 0.125 | 5.969 | 11.621 | 8.328 | |
低覆盖度草地 Grassland with low coverage | 0.035 | 1.648 | 7.772 | 7.060 | |
未利用地 Unutilized lands | 沼泽地 Marsh | 3.439 | 0.527 | 0.083 | 0.579 |
裸土地 Bare land | 0.149 | 0.398 | 0.653 | 86.917 | |
沙地 Sand land | 0.010 | 0.013 | 0.037 | 0.866 | |
裸岩石质地 Bare rock | 0.008 | 0 | 0.002 | 2.239 | |
合计 Total | 96.230 | 110.427 | 1,075.334 | 2,192.550 |
表4 未被自然保护区和生态保护红线覆盖的受胁鸟类一级关键、二级关键、三级和四级栖息地类型及其面积(km2)
Table 4 The types and area (km2) of the habitats of threatened birds uncovered by the nature reserves and the ecological protection red line
一类栖息地 Habitat I | 二类栖息地 Habitat II | 一级关键栖息地 1st level key habitats | 二级关键栖息地 2nd level key habitats | 三级栖息地 3rd level habitats | 四级栖息地 4th level habitats |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水域 Waters | 河渠 River | 0.600 | 33.434 | 8.409 | 17.644 |
湖泊 Lake | 16.765 | 1.884 | 0.162 | 0.783 | |
水库 Reservoir | 7.720 | 0.345 | 0.054 | 3.853 | |
坑塘 Pool | 39.389 | 9.231 | 1.167 | 3.940 | |
滩地 Shallows | 3.205 | 1.152 | 0.184 | 0.597 | |
耕地 Farmlands | 水田 Paddy field | 0.002 | 0.022 | 0.483 | 0.050 |
旱地 Dry farmland | 1.489 | 6.941 | 984.528 | 174.111 | |
林地 Woodlands | 灌木林 Shrub land | 0.138 | 0.192 | 21.947 | 37.895 |
疏林地 Open forest | 0.092 | 0.236 | 0.274 | 33.018 | |
有林地 Woodland | 2.716 | 8.152 | 32.228 | 1,479.720 | |
其他林地 Other woodland | 0.564 | 0.612 | 4.678 | 319.142 | |
草地 Grasslands | 高覆盖度草地 Grassland with high coverage | 19.786 | 39.669 | 1.054 | 15.808 |
中覆盖度草地 Grassland with medium coverage | 0.125 | 5.969 | 11.621 | 8.328 | |
低覆盖度草地 Grassland with low coverage | 0.035 | 1.648 | 7.772 | 7.060 | |
未利用地 Unutilized lands | 沼泽地 Marsh | 3.439 | 0.527 | 0.083 | 0.579 |
裸土地 Bare land | 0.149 | 0.398 | 0.653 | 86.917 | |
沙地 Sand land | 0.010 | 0.013 | 0.037 | 0.866 | |
裸岩石质地 Bare rock | 0.008 | 0 | 0.002 | 2.239 | |
合计 Total | 96.230 | 110.427 | 1,075.334 | 2,192.550 |
[1] | Beijing Municipal Bureau Statistics, Survey Office of the National Bureau of Statistics in Beijing (2019) Beijing Statistical Yearbook 2019. China Statistics Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 北京市统计局, 国家统计局北京调查总队 (2019) 北京统计年鉴2019. 中国统计出版社, 北京.] | |
[2] | Chen ZQ, Fu JP, Zhao XR, Ding CQ (2010) The construction of birds in Yuanmingyuan Relic Park, Beijing. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 45(4),21-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 陈志强, 付建平, 赵欣如, 丁长青 (2010) 北京圆明园遗址公园鸟类组成. 动物学杂志, 45(4),21-30.]. | |
[3] | CBD Convention on Biological Diversity (2011) Conference of the Parties Decision X/2: Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268. (accessed on 2020-03-20) |
[4] | Dinerstein E, Olson D, Joshi A, Vynne C, Burgess ND, Wikramanayake E, Hahn N, Palminteri S, Hedao P, Noss R, Hansen M, Locke H, Ellis EC, Jones B, Barber CV, Hayes R, Kormos C, Martin V, Crist E, Sechrest W, Price L, Baillie JEM, Weeden D, Suckling K, Davis C, Sizer N, Moore R, Thau D, Birch T, Potapov P, Turubanova S, Tyukavina A, de Souza N, Pintea L, Brito JC, Llewellyn OA, Miller AG, Patzelt A, Ghazanfar SA, Timberlake J, Klöser H, Shennan-Farpón Y, Kindt R, Lillesø JPB, van Breugel P, Graudal L, Voge M, Al-Shammari KF, Saleem M (2017) An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. BioScience, 67,534-545. |
[5] | Ding ZG (2009) Construction Restriction Planning of Beijing (2006-2020). Jiangsu Urban Planning, (9),38-43. (in Chinese) |
[ 丁志刚 (2009) 北京市限建区规划 (2006年-2020年). 江苏城市规划, (9),38-43.]. | |
[6] | eBird Basic Dataset (2020) Version: EBD_relMay-2020. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. |
[7] | Editorial Committee of Zoology of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences (1978-2010) Fauna of China (Avifauna) Volume 1-14. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 中国科学院中国动物志编辑委员会 (1978-2010) 中国动物志(鸟纲), 1-14卷. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[8] | Fernández-Juricic E, Jokimäki J (2001) A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: Case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodiversity & Conservation, 10,2023-2043. |
[9] | He Y (2008) Space restriction of urban-rural construction and development—Construction restriction planning of Beijing. China Construction, (9),15-17. (in Chinese) |
[ 何永 (2008) 城乡建设发展的空间限制——北京市限建区规划. 中华建设, (9),15-17.]. | |
[10] | Herrando S, Weiserbs A, Quesada J, Ferrer X, Paquet JY (2012) Development of urban bird indicators using data from monitoring schemes in two large European cities. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 35,141-150. |
[11] | Hu RC, Wen C, Gu YY, Wang H, Gu L, Shi XY, Zhong J, Wei M, He FQ, Lü Z (2017) A bird’s view of new conservation hotspots in China. Biological Conservation, 211,47-55. |
[12] | Hua R, Cui DY, Li SH, Liu J, Yan S, Yang J, Zhang CL, Li XG (2019) Investigations on bird diversity of the Summer Palace in Beijing, China. Chinese Journal of Wildlife, 40,945-956. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 滑荣, 崔多英, 李淑红, 刘佳, 颜素, 杨静, 张成林, 李晓光 (2019) 北京颐和园鸟类多样性调查. 野生动物学报, 40,945-956.]. | |
[13] | Huang Y (2015) The methodology of bird habitats’ making and planning at Beijing urban green spaces. Tsinghua University, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 黄越 (2015) 北京城市绿地鸟类生境规划与营造方法研究. 清华大学, 北京.]. | |
[14] | Huang Y, Zhao YZ, Li SH, von Gadow K (2015) The effects of habitat area, vegetation structure and insect richness on breeding bird populations in Beijing urban parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14,1027-1039. |
[15] | International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (2020) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-1. https://www.iucnredlist.org. (accessed on 2020-07-11) |
[16] | Jokimäki J, Suhonen J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki ML (2018) Urban core areas are important for species conservation: A European-level analysis of breeding bird species. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178,73-81. |
[17] | Lawton JH, Gaston KJ (2001) Indicator species. In: Encyclopedia of Biodiversity,437-450. Elsevier, Amsterdam. |
[18] | Lei FM, Zhao HF, Yin ZH (2006) Distribution pattern of endangered bird species in China. Integrative Zoology, 1,162-169. |
[19] | Lepage D (2021) Avibase—The World Bird Database. http://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/checklist.jsp?region=CNbj. (accessed on 2020-03-20). |
[20] |
Li L, Hu RC, Huang JK, Bürgi M, Zhu ZY, Zhong J, Lü Z (2020) A farmland biodiversity strategy is needed for China. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4,772-774.
DOI URL PMID |
[21] | Liu Y, Li Q, Zhang MQ (2015) Dynamic change in bird community in the Temple of Heaven in Beijing. Ecological Science, 34(4),64-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 刘洋, 李强, 张明庆 (2015) 北京天坛公园鸟类群落的动态变化研究. 生态科学, 34(4),64-70.]. | |
[22] | Long Y, He Y, Liu X, Du LQ (2006) Planning of the controlled-construction area in Beijing: Establishing urban expansion boundary. City Planning Review, 30(12),20-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 龙瀛, 何永, 刘欣, 杜立群 (2006) 北京市限建区规划: 制订城市扩展的边界. 城市规划, 30(12),20-26.]. | |
[23] |
Luck GW (2007) A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity. Biological Reviews, 82,607-645.
DOI URL PMID |
[24] | MacKinnon J, Phillipps K, He FQ (2000) A Field Guide to the Birds of China. Hunan Education Press, Changsha. (in Chinese) |
[ MacKinnon J, Phillipps K, 何芬奇 (2000) 中国鸟类野外手册. 湖南教育出版社, 长沙.] | |
[25] | Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Gil PR (1999) Megadiversity: Earth’s biologically wealthiest nations. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 3,537. |
[26] | Moradi S, Ilanloo SS, Kafash A, Yousefi M (2019) Identifying high-priority conservation areas for avian biodiversity using species distribution modeling. Ecological Indicators, 97,159-164. |
[27] | Pellissier V, Schmucki R, Pe’Er G, Aunins A, Brereton TM, Brotons L, Carnicer J, Chodkiewicz T, Chylarecki P, del Moral JC, Escandell V, Evans D, Foppen R, Harpke A, Heliölä J, Herrando S, Kuussaari M, Kühn E, Lehikoinen A, Lindström Å, Moshøj CM, Musche M, Noble D, Oliver TH, Reif J, Richard D, Roy DB, Schweiger O, Settele J, Stefanescu C, Teufelbauer N, Touroult J, Trautmann S, van Strien AJ, van Swaay CAM, van Turnhout C, Vermouzek Z, Voříšek P, Jiguet F, Julliard R (2020) Effects of Natura 2000 on nontarget bird and butterfly species based on citizen science data. Conservation Biology, 34,666-676. |
[28] | Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109,16083-16088. |
[29] | Song K, Mi CR, Zhao YZ, Yang N, Sun YH, Xu JL (2016) Modeling habitat factors and suitability for the brown eared pheasant (Crossoptilon mantchuricum) in Baihuashan National Nature Reserve, Beijing. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 51,363-372. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 宋凯, 宓春荣, 赵玉泽, 杨南, 孙悦华, 徐基良 (2016) 百花山国家级自然保护区褐马鸡栖息地利用分析. 动物学杂志, 51,363-372.]. | |
[30] | Tang XP, Luan XF (2017) Developing a nature protected area system composed mainly of national parks. Forest Resources Management, (6),1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 唐小平, 栾晓峰 (2017) 构建以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系. 林业资源管理, (6),1-8.]. | |
[31] | Wen C, Gu L, Wang H, Lü Z, Hu RC, Zhong J (2015) GAP analysis on national nature reserves in China based on the distribution of endangered species. Biodiversity Science, 23,591-600. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 闻丞, 顾垒, 王昊, 吕植, 胡若成, 钟嘉 (2015) 基于最受关注濒危物种分布的国家级自然保护区空缺分析. 生物多样性, 23,591-600.]. | |
[32] | Wen C, Han D (2013) Raptor migration monitoring in the spring of 2009 at Baiwangshan, Beijing. Chinese Birds, 4,319-327. |
[33] | Wen C, Han D, Li S, Shen XL, Chen W, Wang H, Zhu XJ, Xiao LY, Liu MQ, Lü Z (2014) Community structure of birds at Yanyuan, Peking University. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 50,416-428. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 闻丞, 韩冬, 李晟, 申小莉, 陈炜, 王昊, 朱小健, 肖凌云, 刘美琦, 吕植 (2014) 北京大学燕园鸟类组成. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 50,416-428.]. | |
[34] | Zhang GG, Zhang ZW, Yang FY, Li SG (2010) Habitat selection of brown-eared pheasant at the Wulushan National Nature Reserve of Shanxi, China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 46(11),100-103. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张国钢, 张正旺, 杨凤英, 李世广 (2010) 山西五鹿山自然保护区褐马鸡栖息地的选择. 林业科学, 46(11),100-103.]. | |
[35] | Zhang GG, Zhang ZW, Zheng GM, Li XQ, Li JF, Huang L (2003) Spatial pattern and habitat selection of brown eared pheasant in Wulushan Nature Reserve, Shanxi Province. Biodiversity Science, 11,303-308. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张国钢, 张正旺, 郑光美, 李晓强, 李俊峰, 黄雷 (2003) 山西五鹿山褐马鸡不同季节的空间分布与栖息地选择研究. 生物多样性, 11,303-308.]. | |
[36] | Zhang GG, Zheng GM, Zhang ZW (2004) Reintroduction of brown eared-pheasant Crossoptilon mantchuricum in Wutaishan Mountains of Shanxi, China. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 50,126-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张国钢, 郑光美, 张正旺 (2004) 山西五台山地区褐马鸡的再引入. 动物学报, 50,126-132.]. | |
[37] | Zhang GG, Zheng GM, Zhang ZW, Guo JR, Wang JP, Gong SL (2005) Scale-dependent wintering habitat selection by brown-eared pheasant in Luyashan Nature Reserve of Shanxi, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25,952-957. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张国钢, 郑光美, 张正旺, 郭建荣, 王建平, 宫树龙 (2005) 山西芦芽山褐马鸡越冬栖息地选择的多尺度研究. 生态学报, 25,952-957.]. | |
[38] | Zheng H, Ouyang ZY (2014) Practice and consideration for ecological red line. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 29,457-461, 448. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 郑华, 欧阳志云 (2014) 生态红线的实践与思考. 中国科学院院刊, 29,457-461, 448.]. |
[1] | 蔡颖莉, 朱洪革, 李家欣. 中国生物多样性保护政策演进、主要措施与发展趋势[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23386-. |
[2] | 鄢德奎. 中国生物多样性保护政策的共同要素、不足和优化建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23293-. |
[3] | 刘荆州, 钱易鑫, 张燕雪丹, 崔凤. 基于潜在迪利克雷分布(LDA)模型的旗舰物种范式研究进展与启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23439-. |
[4] | 张乃鹏, 梁洪儒, 张焱, 孙超, 陈勇, 王路路, 夏江宝, 高芳磊. 土壤类型和地下水埋深对黄河三角洲典型盐沼植物群落空间分异的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23370-. |
[5] | 韩丽霞, 王永健, 刘宣. 外来物种入侵与本土物种分布区扩张的异同[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23396-. |
[6] | 杜红. “物种”与“个体”: 究竟谁是生物多样性保护的恰当对象?[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23140-. |
[7] | 苏荣菲, 陈睿山, 郭晓娜. 城市社区更新中生物多样性的保护策略: 以上海市长宁区生境花园为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 23118-. |
[8] | 陈声文, 任海保, 童光蓉, 王宁宁, 蓝文超, 薛建华, 米湘成. 钱江源国家公园木本植物物种多样性空间分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22587-. |
[9] | 殷鲁秦, 王成, 韩文静. 基于取食行为探究北京居民区鸟类的食源特征及多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22473-. |
[10] | 耿宜佳, 李子圆, 田瑜. 《生物多样性公约》下海洋生物多样性保护的进展、挑战和展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22645-. |
[11] | 赵也茜, 张家语, 李子涵, 解秦米佳, 邓歆, 王楠. 北京城市鸟类夜栖时对本土和外来植物的利用[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22399-. |
[12] | 黄雨菲, 路春燕, 贾明明, 王自立, 苏越, 苏艳琳. 基于无人机影像与面向对象-深度学习的滨海湿地植物物种分类[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22411-. |
[13] | 吴浩, 余玉蓉, 王佳钰, 赵媛博, 高娅菲, 李小玲, 卜贵军, 薛丹, 吴林. 低水位增加灌木多样性和生物量但降低土壤有机碳含量: 以鄂西南贫营养泥炭地为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22600-. |
[14] | 岑渝华, 王鹏, 陈庆春, 张承云, 余上, 胡珂, 刘阳, 肖荣波. 城市绿地动物声景的时空特征及其驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22359-. |
[15] | 马海港, 范鹏来. 被动声学监测技术在陆生哺乳动物研究中的应用、进展和展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22374-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn