《生物多样性公约》审查机制的现状、挑战和展望

doi:10.17520/biods.2020445

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生物多样性丧失是全球共同面临的一项重大挑战, 强化《生物多样性公约》的执行是生物多样性全球治理当前面临的迫切问题, 而推进审查机制建设则是强化执行的一项重要议题, 引起国际社会高度关注。《生物多样性公约》框架下已初步建立起一套涉及多个维度的审查机制, 不断审查《生物多样性公约》及其有关议定书和其他法律文书的执行情况。然而, 审查机制面临着参与审查并强化问责的政治意愿尚显不足、国家信息投入有待加强、审查结论有待助力强化《生物多样性公约》执行、各类审查工具需加强统筹协调等主要问题, 由此也制约了审查工作的完善性和有效性。本文概述了《生物多样性公约》框架下的执行机制, 并重点梳理了审查机制的主要环节和内容, 分析了当前面临的主要障碍, 并就审查机制的进一步建设与强化提出建议, 以期为开展《生物多样性公约》履约与制度建设, 以及有关的研究工作提供参考。在战略层面, 本文认为应当在整体、全面和平衡地推进构建“2020年后全球生物多样性框架”的前提下推进《生物多样性公约》审查机制建设, 应当加强高层政治推动并调动各方行动意愿, 为发展中国家适用一定的和必要的灵活性; 在技术层面, 本文认为应当强化作为《生物多样性公约》审查机制前端的国家信息汇报, 应鼓励缔约方参与具有促进性的审查工作, 为国家自主评估执行情况提供重要补充, 并且审查内容也应当全面和平衡, 可以考虑采取全球盘点机制助力各方弥合执行差距并提升执行力度。

关键词: 生物多样性, 生物多样性公约, 爱知目标, 2020年后全球生物多样性框架, 执行机制, 审查机制

Abstract

Background: The loss of global biological diversity represents a global common concern and a major challenge, while it is urgently needed to strengthen the global biodiversity governance and the implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity. The review mechanism is a crucial agenda item with wide attention of the international community, and a multi-dimensional system has been preliminarily established to support the review of the implementation of the Convention, its protocols and other legal documents.
Challenges: However, the review mechanism has been confronted by the lack of political wills of participation with enhanced accountability, insufficient national inputs, ineffectiveness of review results to enhance implementation, as well as lack of coordination among a proliferation of review tools, all of which constrain the completeness and effectiveness of the review.
Purpose: This paper recaps the implementation mechanism of the Convention and outlines the major processes and contents of the review mechanism, followed by analysis of key obstacles. The paper further discusses and recommends strategic and technical steps to enhance the review mechanism of the Convention, in order to inform the implementation of the Convention, future development of the Convention and related research works.
Recommendations: Our strategic recommendations include strengthening the review mechanism in the light of a comprehensive and balanced advancement of the entire Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, enabled by high-level political support, as well as by the mobilization of willingness and actions from all stakeholders, meanwhile providing necessary flexibility to developing country parties. On the technical side, it is suggested to further enhance national information reporting to be reviewed and to encourage wide participation of parties in facilitative reviews of implementation, complementing those assessment efforts made by party themselves. Meanwhile, information to be reviewed shall also be comprehensive and balanced, while it is also suggested to consider the global stock-take mechanism to support efforts by parties to close the implementation gaps and to enhance actions and ambitions.

Key words: biodiversity, Convention on Biological Diversity, Aichi Target, Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, implementation mechanism, review mechanism

于书霞, 邓梁春, 吴琼, 王真 (2021) 《生物多样性公约》审查机制的现状、挑战和展望. 生物多样性, 29, 238-246. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020445.

Shuxia Yu, Liangchun Deng, Qiong Wu, Zhen Wang (2021) The review mechanism of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Status, challenges and prospects. Biodiversity Science, 29, 238-246. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020445.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2020445

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2021/V29/I2/238

参考文献 17

[1]	Bhatt R, Gill MJ, Hamilton H, Han XM, Linden HM, Young BE (2020) Uneven use of biodiversity indicators in 5th National Reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Environmental Conservation, 47, 15-21.
[2]	Bowles-Newark NJ, Chenery A, Misrachi M, Despot-Belmonte K (2015) Barriers to the Use of Global Indicators and Datasets to Support NBSAP Implementation and National Reporting Processes. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-19/information/sbstta-19-inf-10-en.pdf. (accessed on 2020-11-20)
[3]	CBD (2020a) Report of the Open-Ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework on Its Second Meeting. CBD/WG2020/2/4. 29 February, 2020. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/b14d/6af5/a97c4f2c9d58203f5e2e059c/wg2020-02-04-en.pdf. ( accessed on 2020-11-20)
[4]	CBD (2020b) Recommendations adopted by the Open-Ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. CBD/WG2020/REC/2/1. 29 February, 2020. . (accessed on 2020-11-20)
[5]	CBD (2020c) Options to Enhance Planning, Reporting, and Review Mechanism with a View to Strengthening the Implementation of the Convention. CBD/SBI/3/11. 19 October, 2020. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/3572/0ba5/0c4173a13cf0e7b040f7e6e2/sbi-03-11-en.pdf. (accessed on 2020-11-20)
[6]	Chai QM, Fu S, Qi Y, Fan X (2020) Evaluation on the Paris Agreement work program and prospects for global climate governance. Climate Change Research, 16, 232-242. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 柴麒敏, 傅莎, 祁悦, 樊星 (2020) 《巴黎协定》实施细则评估与全球气候治理展望. 气候变化研究进展, 16, 232-242.]
[7]	Geng YJ, Tian Y, Li JS, Xu J (2020) Progress and prospects of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Biodiversity Science, 28, 238-243. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 耿宜佳, 田瑜, 李俊生, 徐靖 (2020) “2020年后全球生物多样性框架”进展及展望. 生物多样性, 28, 238-243.]
[8]	IPBES (2019) Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany.
[9]	Liu HO, Zhang FC, Zhao FW, Du LS, Xue DY (2020) Biodiversity sensitive issues from changes in the strategic objectives of the financial mechanism for the Convention on Biological Diversity. Biodiversity Science, 28, 244-252. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 刘海鸥, 张风春, 赵富伟, 杜乐山, 薛达元 (2020) 从《生物多样性公约》资金机制战略目标变迁解析生物多样性热点问题. 生物多样性, 28, 244-252.]
[10]	Liu WJ, Xu J, Geng YJ, Tian Y, Yin SL (2018) Progress in negotiations on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and suggestions for Chinese government. Biodiversity Science, 26, 1358-1364. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 刘文静, 徐靖, 耿宜佳, 田瑜, 银森录 (2018) “2020年后全球生物多样性框架”的谈判进展以及对我国的建议. 生物多样性, 26, 1358-1364.]
[11]	Mihoub JB, Henle K, Titeux N, Brotons L, Brummitt NA, Schmeller DS (2017) Setting temporal baselines for biodiversity: The limits of available monitoring data for capturing the full impact of anthropogenic pressures. Scientific Reports, 7, 1-10.
[12]	Pereira HM, Navarro LM, Martins IS (2012) Global biodiversity change: The bad, the good, and the unknown. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 25-50.
[13]	Ulloa AM, Jax K, Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen SI (2018) Enhancing implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity: A novel peer-review mechanism aims to promote accountability and mutual learning. Biological Conservation, 217, 371-376.
[14]	Wang T, Dong L, Gao X (2019) Establishment and implementation prospects of the enhanced transparency system under the Paris Agreement. Climate Change Research, 15, 684-692. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王田, 董亮, 高翔 (2019) 《巴黎协定》强化透明度体系的建立与实施展望. 气候变化研究进展, 15, 684-692.]
[15]	Xu HG, Cao Y, Yu DD, Cao MC, He YX, Gill M, Pereira H (2021) Ensuring effective implementation of the post- 2020 global biodiversity targets. Nature Ecology & Evolution, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01375-y URL PMID
[16]	Xu J, Geng YJ, Yin SL, Shi CZ (2018) A study on elements of Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework based on sustainable development goals. Environmental Protection, 46(23), 17-22. (in Chinese)
	[ 徐靖, 耿宜佳, 银森录, 史朝中 (2018) 基于可持续发展目标的“2020年后全球生物多样性框架”要素研究. 环境保护, 46(23), 17-22.]
[17]	Zhang M, Yang XH, Lan Y, Peng N (2020) The assessment on the implementation progress of Aichi Biodiversity Targets and policy recommendations. Environmental Protection, 48(19), 60-63. (in Chinese)
	[ 张敏, 杨晓华, 蓝艳, 彭宁 (2020) 爱知生物多样性目标实施进展评估与对策建议. 环境保护, 48(19), 60-63.]