浙江古田山次生与老龄常绿阔叶林群落特征的比较

doi:10.17520/biods.2019059

生物多样性 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (10): 1069-1080. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019059

• 研究报告:植物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

浙江古田山次生与老龄常绿阔叶林群落特征的比较

张田田¹, 王璇², 任海保², 余建平³, 金毅¹, 钱海源³, 宋小友³, 马克平², 于明坚¹^,^*()

1 浙江大学生命科学学院, 杭州 310058
2 中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093
3 钱江源国家公园生态资源保护中心, 浙江开化 324300

收稿日期:2019-02-28 接受日期:2019-09-01 出版日期:2019-10-20 发布日期:2019-10-20
通讯作者: 于明坚
基金资助:
科技部基础性工作专项(2015FY210200-17);浙江省科技计划(2015C02016);浙江省科技计划(2017C02028)

A comparative study on the community characteristics of secondary and old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forests in Gutianshan, Zhejiang Province

Tiantian Zhang¹, Xuan Wang², Haibao Ren², Jianping Yu³, Yi Jin¹, Haiyuan Qian³, Xiaoyou Song³, Keping Ma², Mingjian Yu¹^,^*()

1 College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058
2 State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093
3 Center of Ecology and Resources, Qianjiangyuan National Park, Kaihua, Zhejiang 324300

Received:2019-02-28 Accepted:2019-09-01 Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-10-20
Contact: Mingjian Yu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

常绿阔叶林为东亚亚热带地区的地带性植被, 对该地区的生物多样性维持和社会发展具有重要的意义。由于长期人类活动的影响, 目前我国分布的常绿阔叶林绝大部分为次生常绿阔叶林。探究次生与老龄常绿阔叶林群落特征的差异, 有利于了解人类干扰对亚热带常绿阔叶林的影响, 为其保护和恢复提供依据。本研究在古田山老龄与次生常绿阔叶林内共设置了29个0.04 ha样地, 比较两者在优势种组成、物种和功能多样性以及生物量等方面的差异。结果表明: (1)次生林与老龄林优势种组成相似, 二者均以甜槠(Castanopsis eyrei)、木荷(Schima superba)等典型常绿阔叶林优势种为主, 但这些树种在次生和老龄常绿阔叶林中的优势度次序不同。(2)整体而言, 次生林的Shannon-Wiener指数和功能离散度高于老龄林; 次生林与老龄林的物种Bray-Curtis指数和功能Sørensen指数均无显著差别。(3)就垂直层次而言, 次生林与老龄林在Shannon-Wiener指数和Bray-Curtis指数的差异主要体现在乔木层和灌木层。(4)就群落结构而言, 次生林的植株密度高于老龄林, 但群落水平和个体水平的生物量均显著小于老龄林。上述结果表明, 人类干扰改变了古田山常绿阔叶林群落的多个重要特征, 不同群落特征的恢复过程并不同步。因此, 对常绿阔叶林生物多样性和生态系统功能的保护和恢复需要从多个角度着手。

关键词: 老龄林, 次生林, 物种组成, α多样性, β多样性, 功能性状, 生物量, 植株密度

Abstract

Evergreen broad-leaved forests (EBLFs), which are the primary zonal vegetation of subtropical East Asia, shelter high biodiversity and contribute significantly to human welfare. Today, most EBLFs are secondary growth due to long-term human activity. The few remaining old-growth EBLFs are small, scattered patches. Understanding how secondary and old-growth EBLFs differ in their community characteristics would provide guidance for their conservation and restoration. Here, we compare the dominant species composition, species and functional diversity, and aboveground biomass between old-growth (fifteen 20 m × 20 m plots) and secondary (fourteen 20 m × 20 m plots) EBLFs in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve (GNNR). We found that: (1) Both old-growth and secondary EBLFs were dominated by the same set of evergreen broad-leaved species, such as Castanopsis eyrei and Schima superba, but the species dominance order was inconsistent in the two forest types. (2) Secondary EBLFs had a higher Shannon-Wiener index value and greater functional dispersion than old-growth EBLFs, but neither the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index values nor the functional Sørensen index values differed greatly between secondary and old-growth EBLFs. (3) When considering three vertical forest layers separately, the differences in the Shannon-Wiener and Bray-Curtis indices between secondary and old-growth EBLFs were mainly reflected in the tree and shrub layers. (4) Looking at the community structure overall, the stem density was greater in secondary EBLFs than old-growth EBLFs. Additionally, the community level and the individual level biomass were both lower in secondary EBLFs than old-growth EBLFs. These findings suggest that human disturbance has changed multiple characteristics of the EBLFs in GNNR, and their recovery process has been asymmetrical. Accordingly, any conservation plans to restore the biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in EBLFs should adopt a multi-faceted strategy.

Key words: old-growth forest, secondary forest, species composition, α diversity, β diversity, functional trait, biomass, stem density

张田田, 王璇, 任海保, 余建平, 金毅, 钱海源, 宋小友, 马克平, 于明坚 (2019) 浙江古田山次生与老龄常绿阔叶林群落特征的比较. 生物多样性, 27, 1069-1080. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019059.

Tiantian Zhang, Xuan Wang, Haibao Ren, Jianping Yu, Yi Jin, Haiyuan Qian, Xiaoyou Song, Keping Ma, Mingjian Yu (2019) A comparative study on the community characteristics of secondary and old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forests in Gutianshan, Zhejiang Province. Biodiversity Science, 27, 1069-1080. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019059.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2019059

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2019/V27/I10/1069

图/表 9

表1 古田山国家级自然保护区老龄和次生常绿阔叶林重要值排名前十的木本植物

Table 1 Importance value (IV) of the top 10 dominant species in old-growth and secondary evergreen broad-leaved forests in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve

排名 Rank	老龄林 Old-growth forest	重要值 IV	排名 Rank	次生林 Secondary forest	重要值 IV
1	甜槠 Castanopsis eyrei	17.22	1	木荷 Schima superba	16.86
2	木荷 Schima superba	9.09	2	甜槠 Castanopsis eyrei	11.34
3	马银花 Rhododendron ovatum	5.00	3	格药柃 Eurya muricata	4.25
4	格药柃 Eurya muricata	3.63	4	檵木 Loropetalum chinense	3.80
5	马尾松 Pinus massoniana	3.09	5	青冈 Cyclobalanopsis glauca	3.42
6	虎皮楠 Daphniphyllum oldhami	3.07	6	石栎 Lithocarpus glaber	3.26
7	红楠 Machilus thunbergii	2.54	7	马尾松 Pinus massoniana	2.46
8	青冈 Cyclobalanopsis glauca	2.45	8	鹿角杜鹃 Rhododendron latoucheae	2.23
9	毛花连蕊茶 Camellia trichoclada	2.41	9	杉木 Cunninghamia lanceolata	2.22
10	鹿角杜鹃 Rhododendron latoucheae	2.12	10	马银花 Rhododendron ovatum	2.21

图1 古田山国家级自然保护区老龄和次生常绿阔叶林Shannon-Wiener指数(A)和功能离散度(B)的比较。若两个箱线图上方的字母不同, 则表明存在显著性差异(Padj < 0.05, Wilcoxon秩和检验, P值通过Holm方法校正)。

Fig. 1 Comparisons of Shannon-Wiener index and functional dispersion between old-growth and secondary evergreen broad-leaved forests in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. Different lower-case letters above the boxes indicate significant pairwise difference (Padj < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P value was adjusted using the Holm method).

图2 古田山国家级自然保护区老龄和次生常绿阔叶林灌木层(A)、亚乔木层(B)和乔木层(C)的Shannon-Wiener指数比较。若两个箱线图上方的字母不同, 则表明存在显著性差异(Padj < 0.05, Wilcoxon秩和检验, P值通过Holm方法校正)。

Fig. 2 Comparisons of Shannon-Wiener index of shrub layer (A), sub-tree layer (B) and tree layer (C) between old-growth and secondary evergreen broad-leaved forests in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. Different lower-case letters above the boxes indicate significant pairwise difference (Padj < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P value was adjusted using the Holm method).

表2 古田山国家级自然保护区常绿阔叶林Shannon-Wiener指数和功能离散度与环境因子的关系。*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001。

Table 2 Relationship between environmental factors and Shannon-Wiener index and functional dispersion of evergreen broad-leaved forests in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

	Shannon-Wiener指数 Shannon-Wiener index	功能离散度 Functional dispersion
截距 Intercept	19.933^***	0.1944^***
人类干扰 Human disturbance	10.271^**	0.0259
sin(坡向) sin(Aspect)
cos(坡向) cos(Aspect)	-4.658^*
海拔 Elevation		0.0001
坡度 Slope

图3 古田山国家级自然保护区次生常绿阔叶林群落特征与林龄的线性回归模型结果

Fig. 3 Linear regression model results of age effects on community structure of secondary evergreen broad-leaved forests in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve

图4 古田山国家级自然保护区老龄林和次生林的物种稀疏曲线

Fig. 4 Species rarefaction curves of old-growth forest and secondary forest in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve

图5 古田山国家级自然保护区老龄和次生常绿阔叶林间物种Bray-Curtis指数(A)和功能Sørensen指数(B)比较。若两个箱线图上方的字母不同, 则表明存在显著性差异(Padj < 0.05, Wilcoxon秩和检验, P值通过Holm方法校正)。

Fig. 5 Comparisons of species Bray-Curtis index (A) and functional Sørensen index (B) between old-growth and secondary evergreen broad-leaved forests in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. Different lower-case letters above the boxes indicate significant pairwise difference (Padj < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P value was adjusted using the Holm method). OF, Old-growth Forest; SF, Secondary Forest.

图6 古田山国家级自然保护区老龄和次生常绿阔叶林灌木层(A)、亚乔木层(B)和乔木层(C)的物种Bray-Curtis指数比较。若两个箱线图上方的字母不同, 则表明存在显著性差异(Padj < 0.05, Wilcoxon秩和检验, P值通过Holm方法校正)。

Fig. 6 Comparisons of species Bray-Curtis index of shrub layer (A), sub-tree layer (B) and tree layer (C) between old-growth and secondary evergreen broad-leaved forests in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. Different lower-case letters above the boxes indicate significant pairwise difference (Padj < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P value was adjusted using the Holm method).

表3 环境因子对样地植株密度和地上部分生物量影响的线性回归结果。*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001。

Table 3 Linear regression model of environmental factors effects on aboveground biomass of each plot. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

	植株密度 Stem density	地上部分生物量 Aboveground biomass
截距 Intercept	-1.4915^**	7231.301^*
人类干扰 Human disturbance	1.0059^***	-2881.881^*
海拔 Elevation		6.135
sin (坡向) sin (Aspect)
cos (坡向) cos (Aspect)
坡度 Slope	-0.4319^**

参考文献 54

[1]	Aiba S, Hill DA, Agetsuma N ( 2001) Comparison between old-growth stands and secondary stands regenerating after clear-felling in warm-temperate forests of Yakushima, southern Japan. Forest Ecology and Management, 140, 163-175.
[2]	Ali A, Yan ER, Chen HY, Zhao YT, Yang XD, Xu MS ( 2016) Relative contribution of stand characteristics on carbon stocks in subtropical secondary forests in Eastern China. Biogeosciences, 13, 4627-4635.
[3]	Bao WK, Liu ZG ( 2002) Community features of the primary and naturally secondary evergreen broad-leaved forests in Mt. Wawu in Sichuan, China. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 8, 120-126. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 包维楷, 刘照光 ( 2002) 四川瓦屋山原生和次生常绿阔叶林的群落学特征. 应用与环境生物学报, 8, 120-126.]
[4]	Bartoń K ( 2017) MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.42.1. . (accessed on 2019-02-25)
[5]	Baselga A ( 2012) The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 21, 1223-1232.
[6]	Biswas SR, Mallik AU ( 2010) Disturbance effects on species diversity and functional diversity in riparian and upland plant communities. Ecology, 91, 28-35.
[7]	Borcard D, Gillet F , Legendre P (translated by Lai JS)( 2011) Numerical Ecology with R. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 赖江山 (译)( 2014) 数量生态学: R语言的应用. 高等教育出版社, 北京.]
[8]	Bruelheide B, Hobhnke M, Both S, Tang F, Assmann T, Baruffol M, Bauhus J, Buscot F, Chen XY, Ding BY, Durka W, Erfmeier A, Fischer M, Geißler C, Guo DL, Guo LD, Härdtle W, He JS, Hector A, Kröber W, Kühn P, Lang AC, Nadrowski K, Pei KQ, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Shi XZ, Scholten T, Schuldt A, Trogisch S, von Oheimb G, Welk E, Wirth C, Wu YT, Yang XF, Zeng XQ, Zhang SR, Zhou HZ, Ma KP, Schmid B ( 2011) Community assembly during secondary forest succession in a Chinese subtropical forest. Ecological Monographs, 81, 25-41.
[9]	Cardinale BJ, Matulich KL, Hooper DU, Byrnes JE, Duffy E, Gamfeldt L, Balvanera P, O’Connor MI, Gonzalez A ( 2011) The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. American Journal of Botany, 98, 572-592.
[10]	Chazdon RL, Letcher SG, Van Breugel M, Martínez-Ramos M, Bongers F, Bryan F ( 2007) Rates of change in tree communities of secondary Neotropical forests following major disturbances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 273-289.
[11]	Ding Y, Zang RG, Letcher SR, Liu SR, He FL ( 2012) Disturbance regime changes the trait distribution, phylogenetic structure and community assembly of tropical rain forests. Oikos, 121, 1263-1270.
[12]	Editorial Board of Kaihua Forests( 1988) Forestry Chorography in Kaihua County. Zhejiang People’s Publishing House, Hangzhou. (in Chinese)
	[ 开化林业志编写组( 1988) 开化林业志. 浙江人民出版社, 杭州.]
[13]	Feng G, Ai XR, Yao L, Liu JC, Huang YT, Lin Y ( 2016) Dynamics of natural restoration of subtropical evergreen-deciduous broadleaved mixed forests in southwest Hubei Province and influencing factors. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 52(8), 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 冯广, 艾训儒, 姚兰, 刘峻城, 黄永涛, 林勇 ( 2016) 鄂西南亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林的自然恢复动态及其影响因素. 林业科学, 52(8), 1-9.]
[14]	Feng G, Svenning JC, Mi XC, Jia Q, Rao MD, Ren HB, Bebber DP, Ma KP ( 2014) Anthropogenic disturbance shapes phylogenetic and functional tree community structure in a subtropical forest. Forest Ecology & Management, 313, 188-198.
[15]	Gower JC ( 1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 27, 857-871.
[16]	Hu G, Jin Y, Liu JL, Yu MJ ( 2014) Functional diversity versus species diversity: Relationships with habitat heterogeneity at multiple scales in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest. Ecological Research, 29, 897-903.
[17]	Hu ZH, Yu MJ, Ding BY, Fang T, Qian HY, Chen QC ( 2003) Types of evergreen broad-leaved forests and their species diversity in Gutian Mountain National Nature Reserve. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 9, 341-345. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 胡正华, 于明坚, 丁炳扬, 方腾, 钱海源, 陈启瑺 ( 2003) 古田山国家级自然保护区常绿阔叶林类型及其群落物种多样性研究. 应用与环境生物学报, 9, 341-345.]
[18]	Huang B ( 2012) Rarefaction and its application to the study of diversity of palaeocommunties. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 51, 200-208. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 黄冰 ( 2012) 浅谈稀疏标准化方法(Rarefaction)及其在群落多样性研究中的应用. 古生物学报, 51, 200-208.]
[19]	Huang YT, Zhang X, Zang RG, Fu SL, Ai XR, Yao L, Ding Y, Huang JH, Lu XH ( 2018) Functional recovery of a subtropical evergreen-deciduous broadleaved mixed forest following clear cutting in Central China. Scientific Reports, 8, 16458.
[20]	Jin Y, Russo SE, Yu MJ ( 2018) Effects of light and topography on regeneration and coexistence of evergreen and deciduous tree species in a Chinese subtropical forest. Journal of Ecology, 106, 1634-1645.
[21]	Laliberté E, Legendre P ( 2010) A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology, 91, 299-305.
[22]	Laliberté E, Legendre P, Shipley B ( 2014) FD: Measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. R package version 1.0-12. . ( accessed on 2019-02-25)
[23]	Li QK, Ma KP ( 2002) Advances in plant succession ecophysiology. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 26(Suppl.), 9-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 李庆康, 马克平 ( 2002) 植物群落演替过程中植物生理生态学特性及其主要环境因子的变化. 植物生态学报, 26(增刊), 9-19.]
[24]	Lin DM, Lai JS, Muller-Landau HC, Mi XC, Ma KP ( 2012) Topographic variation in aboveground biomass in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in China. PLoS ONE, 7, e48244.
[25]	Lin DM, Pang M, Lai JS, Mi XC, Ren HB, Ma KP ( 2017) Multivariate relationship between tree diversity and aboveground biomass across tree strata in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest. Chinese Science Bulletin, 17, 1861-1868. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 林敦梅, 庞梅, 赖江山, 米湘成, 任海保, 马克平 ( 2017) 亚热带常绿阔叶林不同林层物种多样性与地上生物量的多变量关系. 科学通报, 17, 1861-1868.]
[26]	Liu JL, Qian H, Jin Y, Wu CP, Chen JH, Yu SQ, Wei XL, Jin XF, Liu JJ, Yu MJ ( 2016) Disentangling the drivers of taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversities in disturbed and undisturbed subtropical forests. Scientific Reports, 6, 35926.
[27]	Lou LH, Jin SH ( 2000) Spermatophyta flora of Gutianshan Nature Reserve in Zhejiang. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 22(5), 33-39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 楼炉焕, 金水虎 ( 2000) 浙江古田山自然保护区种子植物区系分析. 北京林业大学学报, 22(5), 33-39.]
[28]	Lu W, Yu JP, Ren HB, Mi XC, Chen JH, Ma KP ( 2018) Spatial variations in species diversity of mid-subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest community in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science, 26, 1023-1028. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 芦伟, 余建平, 任海保, 米湘成, 陈建华, 马克平 ( 2018) 古田山中亚热带常绿阔叶林群落物种多样性的空间变异特征. 生物多样性, 26, 1023-1028.]
[29]	Matthew JV ( 2012) fossil: Palaeoecological and Palaeogeographical Analysis Tools. R package version 0.3.7. . ( accessed on 2019- 02-25)
[30]	Martin PH, Sherman RE, Fahey TJ ( 2004) Forty years of tropical forest recovery from agriculture: Structure and floristics of secondary and old-growth riparian forests in the Dominican Republic. Biotropica, 36, 297-317.
[31]	Nong Y, Lu LH, You JH, Lei LQ, Wang YN, Li H, Yang GF ( 2018) The plant diversity and biomass of trees in different successional stages of secondary forest of south subtropical. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 38(12), 83-88. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 农友, 卢立华, 游建华, 雷丽群, 王亚南, 李华, 杨桂芳 ( 2018) 南亚热带不同演替阶段次生林植物多样性及乔木生物量. 中南林业科技大学学报, 38(12), 83-88.]
[32]	Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H ( 2016) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package Version 2.3-4. . ( accessed on 2019-02-25)
[33]	Pregitzer KS, Euskirchen ES ( 2010) Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: Biome patterns related to forest age. Global Change Biology, 10, 2052-2077.
[34]	Purschke O, Schmid BC, Sykes MT, Poschlod P, Michalski SG, Durka W, Kühn I, Winter M, Prentice HC ( 2013) Contrasting changes in taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity during a long-term succession: Insights into assembly processes. Journal of Ecology, 101, 857-866.
[35]	Qian HY, Zhang TT, Chen SW, Wu DH, Wu CP, Yuan WG, Jin Y, Yu MJ ( 2018) Community structures and biodiversities of broad-leaved forest and two types of plantations in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve, Zhejiang Province. Guihaia, 38, 115-125. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 钱海源, 张田田, 陈声文, 巫东豪, 吴初平, 袁位高, 金毅. 于明坚 ( 2018) 古田山自然保护区阔叶林与两种人工林的群落结构和生物多样性. 广西植物, 38, 115-125.]
[36]	R Core Team ( 2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. . ( accessed on 2019-02-25)
[37]	ŘEhounková K, Prach K ( 2010) Life-history traits and habitat preferences of colonizing plant species in long-term spontaneous succession in abandoned gravel-sand pits. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 45-53.
[38]	Revell LJ ( 2012) phytools: An R Package for Phylogenetic Comparative Biology (and other things), . ( accessed on 2019-02-25)
[39]	Shang KK, Zhang QP, Da LJ, Hara K, Yang YC, Fujihara M, Tomita M, Zhao Y ( 2014) Effects of natural and artificial disturbance on landscape and forest structure in Tiantong National Forest Park, East China. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 10, 163-172.
[40]	Shi JN, Li W, Meng JH ( 2016) A comparison between tropical primary and secondary forests on Hainan Island. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 22, 271-276. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 史景宁, 李微, 孟京辉 ( 2016) 海南岛热带原始天然林和次生林对比分析. 应用与环境生物学报, 22, 271-276.]
[41]	Song GM, Han TT, Hong L, Zhang LL, Li XB, Ren H ( 2018) Advances in the studies of plant functional traits during succession. Ecological Science, 37, 207-213. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 宋光满, 韩涛涛, 洪岚, 张玲玲, 李晓波, 任海 ( 2018) 演替过程中植物功能性状研究进展. 生态科学, 37, 207-213.]
[42]	Song K, Mi XC, Jia Q, Ren HB, Bebber D, Ma KP ( 2011) Variation in phylogenetic structure of forest communities along a human disturbance gradient in Gutianshan forest, China. Biodiversity Science, 19, 190-196. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 宋凯, 米湘成, 贾琪, 任海保, Bebber D, 马克平 ( 2011) 不同程度人为干扰对古田山森林群落谱系结构的影响. 生物多样性, 19, 190-196.]
[43]	Song YC ( 2013) Evergreen Broad-leaved Forests in China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 宋永昌 ( 2013) 中国常绿阔叶林. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[44]	Song YC ( 2016) Vegetation Ecology, 2nd edn. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 宋永昌 ( 2016) 植被生态学(第二版). 高等教育出版社, 北京.]
[45]	Song YC, Chen XY, Wang XH ( 2005) Study on evergreen broad-leaved forests of China: A retrospect and prospect. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science), ( 1), 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 宋永昌, 陈小勇, 王希华 ( 2005) 中国常绿阔叶林研究的回顾与展望. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), ( 1), 1-8.]
[46]	Stein A, Gerstner K, Kreft H ( 2014) Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecology Letters, 17, 866-880.
[47]	Wang XH ( 2006) The Phytogeography and Species Diversity of Typical Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in China. PhD dissertation, East China Normal University, Shanghai. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王希华 ( 2006) 中国典型常绿阔叶林植物地理与物种多样性研究. 博士学位论文, 华东师范大学, 上海.]
[48]	Wang XH, Kent M, Fang XF ( 2007) Evergreen broad-leaved forest in Eastern China: Its ecology and conservation and the importance of resprouting in forest restoration. Forest Ecology and Management, 245, 76-87.
[49]	Wu YY, Guo CZ, Ni J ( 2014) Dynamics of major forest vegetations in Tiantong National Forest Park during the last 30 years. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 1547-1554. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 吴洋洋, 郭纯子, 倪健 ( 2014) 天童国家森林公园主要森林植被过去30年的动态变化. 应用生态学报, 25, 1547-1554.]
[50]	Wu ZY ( 1980) Vegetation of China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 吴征镒 ( 1980) 中国植被. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[51]	Xu XH, Yu MJ, Hu ZH, Li MH, Zhang FG ( 2005) The structure and dynamics of Castanopsis eyrei population in Gutian Mountain Nature Reserve in Zhejiang, East China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25, 645-653. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 徐学红, 于明坚, 胡正华, 李铭红, 张方钢 ( 2005) 浙江古田山自然保护区甜槠种群结构与动态. 生态学报, 2, 645-653.]
[52]	Xu YJ, Lin DM, Mi XC, Ren HB, Ma KP ( 2014) Recovery dynamics of secondary forests with different disturbance intensity in the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science, 22, 358-365. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 徐远杰, 林敦梅, 米湘成, 任海保, 马克平 ( 2014) 古田山不同干扰程度森林的群落恢复动态. 生物多样性, 22, 358-365.]
[53]	Yu MJ, Hu ZH, Yu JP, Ding BY, Fang T ( 2001) Forest vegetation types in Gutianshan Nature Reserve in Zhejiang. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Science), 27, 375-380. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 于明坚, 胡正华, 余建平, 丁炳扬, 方腾 ( 2001) 浙江古田山自然保护区森林植被类型. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 27, 375-380.]
[54]	Yu MJ, Qian HY, Yu JP ( 2019) Research of Biodiversity in Gutianshan. Zhejiang Science and Technology Press, Hangzhou
	(in press). (in Chinese) [ 于明坚, 钱海源, 余建平 ( 2019) 古田山生物多样性研究. 浙江科学技术出版社, 杭州(排版中).]

浙江古田山次生与老龄常绿阔叶林群落特征的比较

A comparative study on the community characteristics of secondary and old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forests in Gutianshan, Zhejiang Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 54

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李艳朋, 盘李军, 陈洁, 许涵, 杨立新. 亚热带人工混交林叶功能性状对森林演替的响应规律及影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(7): 24049-.
[2]	尹星元, 安慧, 邢彬彬, 苏诗玉, 文志林, 郭建超, 刘小平, 王波. 养分添加和降水变化对荒漠草原地上和地下生物量稳定性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(7): 24073-.
[3]	时永强, 栾青杉, 单秀娟, 韦超, 赵永松, 孙策策, 金显仕. 长岛南部海域浮游动物多样性周年变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(7): 23428-.
[4]	赵勇强, 阎玺羽, 谢加琪, 侯梦婷, 陈丹梅, 臧丽鹏, 刘庆福, 隋明浈, 张广奇. 退化喀斯特森林自然恢复中不同生活史阶段木本植物物种多样性与群落构建[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23462-.
[5]	吴琪, 张晓青, 杨雨婷, 周艺博, 马毅, 许大明, 斯幸峰, 王健. 浙江钱江源-百山祖国家公园庆元片区叶附生苔多样性及其时空变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 24010-.
[6]	吴乐婕, 刘泽康, 田星, 张群, 李博, 吴纪华. 海三棱藨草基因型多样性对种群营养生长和繁殖策略的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23478-.
[7]	陈瑶琪, 郭晶晶, 蔡国俊, 葛依立, 廖宇, 董正, 符辉. 近七十年(1954-2021)长江中下游湖泊沉水植物群落多样性演变特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23319-.
[8]	任嘉隆, 王永珍, 冯怡琳, 赵文智, 严祺涵, 秦畅, 方静, 辛未冬, 刘继亮. 基于陷阱法采集的河西走廊戈壁荒漠甲虫数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23375-.
[9]	林迪, 陈双林, 杜榷, 宋文龙, 饶固, 闫淑珍. 大别山黏菌的物种多样性调查[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23242-.
[10]	冯志荣, 陈有城, 彭艳琼, 李莉, 王波. 生态网络分析: 从集合群落到集合网络[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23171-.
[11]	陈哲涵, 尹进, 叶吉, 刘冬伟, 毛子昆, 房帅, 蔺菲, 王绪高. 增温对东北温带次生林草本群落季节动态的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 23059-.
[12]	陈晓澄, 张鹏展, 康斌, 刘林山, 赵亮. 基于中国科学院西北高原生物研究所馆藏标本分析青藏高原雀形目鸟类物种和功能多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22638-.
[13]	杨清, 李晓东, 杨胜娴, 巢欣, 刘惠秋, 巴桑. 雅鲁藏布江中游丰水期原生动物群落多样性及其影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22500-.
[14]	吴浩, 余玉蓉, 王佳钰, 赵媛博, 高娅菲, 李小玲, 卜贵军, 薛丹, 吴林. 低水位增加灌木多样性和生物量但降低土壤有机碳含量: 以鄂西南贫营养泥炭地为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22600-.
[15]	周欣扬, 王誉陶, 李建平. 黄土高原典型草原植物群落组成对降水变化的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22118-.