木论喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林群丛数量分类及稳定性

doi:10.17520/biods.2019215

生物多样性 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (10): 1056-1068. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019215

• 研究报告:植物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

木论喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林群丛数量分类及稳定性

陈惠君¹^,², 杜虎¹^,², 宋同清¹^,², 彭晚霞¹^,², 张浩¹^,², 苏樑¹^,², 曾馥平¹^,²^,^*()

1 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室, 长沙 410125
2 中国科学院环江喀斯特生态系统观测研究站, 广西环江 547100

收稿日期:2019-07-03 接受日期:2019-10-08 出版日期:2019-10-20 发布日期:2019-12-20
通讯作者: 曾馥平
基金资助:
广西重点研发计划(桂科AB16380255);广西重点研发计划(桂科AB17129009);国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0502405);国家自然科学基金(31770495);国家自然科学基金(31870712);国家自然科学基金(31971487);广西特聘专家项目

Numerical classification of associations and their stabilities of karst evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed forests in Mulun National Nature Reserve

Huijun Chen¹^,², Hu Du¹^,², Tongqing Song¹^,², Wanxia Peng¹^,², Hao Zhang¹^,², Liang Su¹^,², Fuping Zeng¹^,²^,^*()

1 Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125
2 Huanjiang Observation and Research Station of Karst Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huanjiang, Guangxi 547100

Received:2019-07-03 Accepted:2019-10-08 Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-12-20
Contact: Fuping Zeng

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

加深对喀斯特顶极群落植物组成、群落结构和群落分布的认识可以为该区域生物多样性保护和森林管理提供参考。本文基于广西木论喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林25 ha森林动态监测样地地形、土壤和物种组成数据, 采用多元回归树对该群落进行群丛分类, 并分析各群丛多样性和稳定性。结果表明, 群落可分为6个群丛, 分别为群丛I: 长序厚壳桂+栀子皮+香叶树群丛(Ass. Cryptocarya microcarpa + Itoa orientalis + Lindera communis), 群丛II: 长序厚壳桂+灰岩棒柄花+罗伞群丛(Ass. Cryptocarya microcarpa + Cleidion bracteosum + Brassaiopsis glomerulata), 群丛III: 圆果化香树+密花树+齿叶黄皮群丛(Ass. Platycarya longipes + Rapanea neriifolia + Clausena dunniana), 群丛IV: 圆果化香树+滇丁香+齿叶黄皮群丛(Ass. Platycarya longipes + Luculia intermedia + Clausena dunniana), 群丛V: 长序厚壳桂+罗伞+伞花木群丛(Ass. Cryptocarya microcarpa + Brassaiopsis glomerulata + Eurycorymbus cavaleriei), 群丛VI: 小叶栾树+长管越南茜+圆果化香树群丛(Ass. Boniodendron minus + Rubovietnamia aristate + Platycarya longipes)。除群丛I外, 各群丛总体的多样性指数较高。Shannon-Wiener指数、Simpson指数以及Pielou均匀度指数表现出一致的变化趋势: 群丛VI > 群丛V > 群丛IV > 群丛III > 群丛II > 群丛I, 而丰富度则为群丛VI > 群丛IV > 群丛V > 群丛I > 群丛III > 群丛II, 物种多样性在中海拔群丛最高。中上坡部位群丛稳定性最高, 洼地群丛稳定性最低。海拔在群落结构及组成中起重要作用, 可能是影响群落分布的重要因素。

关键词: 植被分类, Godron稳定性分析, 多元回归树, 喀斯特生态系统, 木论国家级自然保护区

Abstract

Understanding plant composition, community structure and community distribution of karst climax communities can provide a reference for biodiversity conservation and forest management. Based on topographic factors, soil factors and species composition data of a 25 ha forest dynamic plot in Mulun, Guangxi, we numerically classified the association of karst evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed forests multivariate regression trees and a modified Godron stability analysis ( Godron, 1971; Zheng, 2000) method to measure the stabilities of associations. The results showed that the forest community was divided into six associations. They were as follows: (I) Ass. Cryptocarya microcarpa + Itoa orientalis + Lindera communis, (II) Ass. Cryptocarya microcarpa + Cleidion bracteosum + Brassaiopsis glomerulata, (III) Ass. Platycarya longipes + Rapanea neriifolia + Clausena dunniana, (IV) Ass. Platycarya longipes + Luculia intermedia + Clausena dunniana, (V) Ass. Cryptocarya microcarpa + Brassaiopsis glomerulata + Eurycorymbus cavaleriei, (VI) Ass. Boniodendron minus + Rubovietnamia aristate + Platycarya Longipes. Except for Ass. I, diversity indices of each association were higher. Shannon-Wiener index, Simpson index and Pielou evenness index showed similar trends: Ass. VI > Ass. V > Ass. IV > Ass. III > Ass. II > Ass. I. Species richness did not follow this trend and decreased in the following order: Ass. VI > Ass. IV > Ass. V > Ass. I > Ass. III > Ass. II. Species diversities of these associations were highest at middle altitudes. The stabilities of associations were highest at medium-high slope positions, while associations were lowest in depressions. Elevation is critical for community structure and composition and may be an important factor affecting community distribution.

Key words: vegetation classification, Godron stability analysis, multivariate regression trees, karst ecosystem, Mulun National Nature Reserve

陈惠君, 杜虎, 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 张浩, 苏樑, 曾馥平 (2019) 木论喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林群丛数量分类及稳定性. 生物多样性, 27, 1056-1068. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019215.

Huijun Chen, Hu Du, Tongqing Song, Wanxia Peng, Hao Zhang, Liang Su, Fuping Zeng (2019) Numerical classification of associations and their stabilities of karst evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed forests in Mulun National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science, 27, 1056-1068. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019215.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2019215

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2019/V27/I10/1056

图/表 7

图1 木论25 ha森林动态监测样地群丛分类相对误差及交叉验证相对误差变化图。▲: 相对误差变化趋势; ●: 交叉验证相对误差变化趋势; ■: 交叉验证相对误差最小点; |: 标准差; ★: 根据“1-SE”规则确定的分类树规模点。

Fig. 1 Resubstitution and cross-validation relative error for the multivariate regression tree of 25 ha forest dynamic plot in Mulun. ▲, The change trend of relative error; ●, The change trend of cross-validated relative error; ■, The minimum cross-validated relative error; |, One standard error; ★, The tree size suggested by 1 - SE.

图2 木论25 ha森林动态监测样地群落分类多元回归树。n表示每组包含的样地数, 柱状图表示各物种在各个群丛中的重要值(各柱状图物种排列完全一致)。

Fig. 2 Multivariate regression tree for community classification of 25 ha forest dynamic plot in Mulun. n, the number of samples in each group. The small bar plot representing the importance value of the species (in the same order as is the response data matrix).

图3 木论25 ha森林动态监测样地6类群丛的20 m × 20 m的样方分布图。左, 修正前。右, 修正后。

Fig. 3 Map of the six associations at the scale of 20 m × 20 m of 25 ha forest dynamic plot in Mulun. Left, Original. Right, Revised.

表1 木论25 ha森林动态监测样地6类群丛的物种丰富度和植株密度

Table 1 Species richness and tree density in six associations of 25 ha forest dynamic plot in Mulun

参数 Parameter	大样地 Whole plot	群丛I Association I	群丛II Association II	群丛III Association III	群丛IV Association IV	群丛V Association V	群丛VI Association VI
面积 Area (ha)	25	9.88	2.44	1.64	2.68	4.28	4.08
丰富度 Richness (ind.)	227	154	130	145	187	174	194
平均胸径 Average DBH (cm)	4.78	4.87	5.54	3.9	3.78	4.83	4.18
最大胸径 Max. DBH (cm)	115.12	115.12	89	55.3	68	57	48.72
植株密度 Density (ind./ha)	5,479	4,912	3,246	9,109	8,693	4,367	5,782

表2 木论25 ha森林动态监测样地6类群丛中各径级植株数占总植株数的比例(%)

Table 2 Percentage of trees in different DBH class to total number of trees in six associations of 25 ha forest dynamic plot in Mulun

径级 DBH class	大样地 Whole plot	群丛I Association I	群丛II Association II	群丛III Association III	群丛IV Association IV	群丛V Association V	群丛VI Association VI
1-5 cm	72.10	67.58	61.45	77.04	79.85	68.94	75.87
5-10 cm	19.02	21.43	25.75	16.25	14.61	20.73	16.99
10-20 cm	7.68	9.64	10.24	5.98	4.92	8.71	6.12
20-30 cm	1.02	1.16	2.10	0.64	0.54	1.33	0.88
30-40 cm	0.14	0.14	0.27	0.07	0.06	0.27	0.12
40-50 cm	0.03	0.05	0.13	0.01	0.02	0.03	0.01
≥ 50 cm	0.01	0.00	0.06	0.01	0.00	0.01	0.00

图4 木论25 ha森林动态监测样地6类群丛的多样性指数

Fig. 4 Diversity indices of the six associations of 25 ha forest dynamic plot in Mulun

图5 木论25 ha森林动态监测样地6类群丛的稳定性

Fig. 5 Stability graphs for six associations of 25 ha forest dynamic plot in Mulun

参考文献 44

[1]	An LJ, Zhu ZH, Wang XA, Guo H ( 2007) Stability analysis of major communities in Malan forest region of Ziwuling Mountain. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 27, 1000-1007. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 安丽娟, 朱志红, 王孝安, 郭华 ( 2007) 子午岭马栏林区主要森林群落的稳定性分析. 西北植物学报, 27, 1000-1007.]
[2]	Bolliger J ( 2005) Simulating complex landscapes with a generic model: Sensitivity to qualitative and quantitative classifications. Ecological Complexity, 2, 131-149.
[3]	Cao WM, Liu XY, Wang GL, Luo YY, He T, Liu TX ( 2017) Combined analyses of MRT and DCCA on relationships between plant community distribution and ecological factors of Horqin Sandy Land. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 36, 318-327. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 曹文梅, 刘小燕, 王冠丽, 罗艳云, 何韬, 刘廷玺 ( 2017) 科尔沁沙地自然植被与生境因子的MRT分类及DCCA分析. 生态学杂志, 36, 318-327.]
[4]	Chen L, Song TQ, Wang H, Zeng FP, Peng WX, Du H, Su L ( 2019) Soil bacterial diversity and optimal sampling number in the Mulun karst evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved mixed forest. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39, 3287-3296. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 陈莉, 宋同清, 王华, 曾馥平, 彭晚霞, 杜虎, 苏樑 ( 2019) 木论喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林土壤细菌多样性及其最优采样数. 生态学报, 39, 3287-3296.]
[5]	Chen Y, Guo L, Yao CL, Wei BL, Yuan ZL, Ye YZ ( 2017) Community characteristics of a deciduous broad-leaved forest in a temperate-subtropical ecological transition zone. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 5602-5611. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 陈云, 郭凌, 姚成亮, 韦博良, 袁志良, 叶永忠 ( 2017) 暖温带-北亚热带过渡区落叶阔叶林群落特征. 生态学报, 37, 5602-5611.]
[6]	Chen Y, Wang HL, Han JW, Wei BL, Jia HR, Ye YZ, Yuan ZL ( 2014) Numerical classification, ordination and species diversity along elevation gradients of the forest community in Xiaoqinling. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 2068-2075. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 陈云, 王海亮, 韩军旺, 韦博良, 贾宏汝, 叶永忠, 袁志良 ( 2014) 小秦岭森林群落数量分类、排序及多样性垂直格局. 生态学报, 34, 2068-2075.]
[7]	Chen Y, Wang T, Li PK, Yao CL, Yuan ZL, Ye YZ ( 2016) Community characteristics and spatial distribution of dominant tree species in a deciduous broad-leaved forest of Muzhaling, Henan, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 40, 1179-1188. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 陈云, 王婷, 李培坤, 姚成亮, 袁志良, 叶永忠 ( 2016) 河南木札岭温带落叶阔叶林群落特征及主要乔木空间分布格局. 植物生态学报, 40, 1179-1188.]
[8]	De’ath G ( 2002) Multivariate regression trees: A new technique for modeling species-environment relationships. Ecology, 83, 1105-1117.
[9]	Dufrene M, Legendre P ( 1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs, 67, 345-366.
[10]	Du H, Hu F, Zeng FP, Wang KL, Peng WX, Zhang H, Zeng ZX, Zhang F, Song TQ ( 2017) Spatial distribution of tree species in evergreen-deciduous broadleaf karst forests in Southwest China. Scientific Reports, 7, 15664.
[11]	Godron M, Daget P, Poissonet J, Poissonet P ( 1971) Some aspects of heterogeneity in grasslands of Cantal (France). Statistical Ecology, 3, 397-415.
[12]	Guo DG, Shangguan TL ( 2005) Quantitative classification and ordination of plant communities in midpiece of Zhongtiao Mountains. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 23, 444-448. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 郭东罡, 上官铁梁 ( 2005) 中条山中段植物群落数量分类与排序研究. 武汉植物学研究, 23, 444-448.]
[13]	Hu F, Zeng FP, Du H, Peng WX, Zhang F, Tan WN, Song TQ ( 2018) Scale-dependent spatial patterns for species diversity in a karst evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved mixed forest of northwest Guangxi. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 6074-6083. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 胡芳, 曾馥平, 杜虎, 彭晚霞, 张芳, 谭卫宁, 宋同清 ( 2018) 桂西北喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林物种多样性分布格局的尺度效应. 生态学报, 38, 6074-6083.]
[14]	Huang FZ, Wang B, Ding T, Xiang WS, Li XK, Zhou AP ( 2014) Numerical classification of associations in the northern tropical karst seasonal rain forests and the relationship with environment. Biodiversity Science, 22, 157-166. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 黄甫昭, 王斌, 丁涛, 向悟生, 李先琨, 周爱萍 ( 2014) 弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林群丛数量分类及与环境的关系. 生物多样性, 22, 157-166.]
[15]	He JS, Chen WL ( 1997) A review of gradient changes in species diversity of land plant communities. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 17, 91-99. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 贺金生, 陈伟烈 ( 1997) 陆地植物群落物种多样性的梯度变化特征. 生态学报, 17, 91-99.]
[16]	Lai JS, Mi XC, Ren HB, Ma KP ( 2010) Numerical classification of associations in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest based on multivariate regression trees―A case study of 24 hm ² Gutianshan forest plot in China . Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 761-769. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 赖江山, 米湘成, 任海保, 马克平 ( 2010) 基于多元回归树的常绿阔叶林群丛数量分类——以古田山24公顷森林样地为例. 植物生态学报, 34, 761-769.]
[17]	Lan SA, Song M, Zeng FP, Song TQ, Peng WX, Du H, Han C, Chen L, Qin WG ( 2016) Altitudinal pattern of woody plant species diversity in the karst forest in Mulun, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 7374-7383. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 兰斯安, 宋敏, 曾馥平, 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 杜虎, 韩畅, 陈莉, 覃文更 ( 2016) 木论喀斯特森林木本植物多样性垂直格局. 生态学报, 36, 7374-7383.]
[18]	Lu LL, Guo ZL, Fan CN, Zheng JP ( 2018) Community characteristics and stability analysis of secondary deciduous broadleaved forest in Mopan Mountains, Jilin Province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29, 2079-2087. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 陆龙龙, 郭忠玲, 范春楠, 郑金萍 ( 2018) 吉林磨盘山次生落叶阔叶林群落特征和稳定性分析. 应用生态学报, 29, 2079-2087.]
[19]	Ma KP ( 2017) Forest dynamics plot is a crosscutting research platform for biodiversity science. Biodiversity Science, 25, 227-228. (in Chinese)
	[ 马克平 ( 2017) 森林动态大样地是生物多样性科学综合研究平台. 生物多样性, 25, 227-228. ]
[20]	Ma KP, Liu YM ( 1994) Measurement of biotic community diversity. I. α diversity (part 2). Chinese Biodiversity, 2, 231-239. (in Chinese)
	[ 马克平, 刘玉明 ( 1994) 生物群落多样性的测度方法I. α多样性的测度方法(下). 生物多样性, 2, 231-239.]
[21]	Qin L ( 2004) Complexity and Stability in the Forest Communities. PhD dissertation, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 覃林 ( 2004) 森林群落的复杂性与稳定性分析. 博士学位论文, 中山大学, 广州.]
[22]	Qu XL, Fang JP ( 2018) Biodiversity and stability of degraded grassland plant communities in different restored years. Journal of Plateau Agriculture, 2, 220-229. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 屈兴乐, 方江平 ( 2018) 不同修复年限退化草地植物群落的物种多样性和稳定性. 高原农业, 2, 220-229.]
[23]	Shang TQ, Ye NN, Gao HQ, Gao HD, Yi LT ( 2018) Community structure analysis of a public welfare forest based on multivariate regression trees. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 53, 238-249. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 商天其, 叶诺楠, 高海卿, 高洪娣, 伊力塔 ( 2018) 基于多元回归树的公益林群落结构解析. 植物学报, 53, 238-249.]
[24]	Song TQ, Peng WX, Zeng FP, Wang KL, Qin WG, Tan WN, Liu L, Du H, Lu SY ( 2010) Spatial pattern of forest communities and environmental interpretation in Mulun National Nature Reserve, karst cluster-peak depression region. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 298-308. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 曾馥平, 王克林, 覃文更, 谭卫宁, 刘璐, 杜虎, 鹿士杨 ( 2010) 木论喀斯特峰丛洼地森林群落空间格局及环境解释. 植物生态学报, 34, 298-308.]
[25]	Song YC ( 2004) Tentative classification scheme of evergreen broad-leaved forests of China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 28, 435-448. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 宋永昌 ( 2004) 中国常绿阔叶林分类试行方案. 植物生态学报, 28, 435-448.]
[26]	Song YC ( 2011) Recognition and proposal on the vegetation classification system of China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 882-892. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 宋永昌 ( 2011) 对中国植被分类系统的认知和建议. 植物生态学报, 35, 882-892.]
[27]	Song YC ( 2016) Vegetation Ecology, 2nd edn. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 宋永昌 ( 2016) 植被生态学 (第二版). 高等教育出版社, 北京.]
[28]	Song YC, Yan ER, Song K ( 2015) Synthetic comparison of eight dynamics plots in evergreen broadleaf forests, China. Biodiversity Science, 23, 139-148. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 宋永昌, 阎恩荣, 宋坤 ( 2015) 中国常绿阔叶林8大动态监测样地植被的综合比较. 生物多样性, 23, 139-148.]
[29]	Song YC, Yan ER, Song K ( 2017) An update of the vegetation classification in China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 41, 269-278. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 宋永昌, 阎恩荣, 宋坤 ( 2017) 再议中国的植被分类系统. 植物生态学报, 41, 269-278.]
[30]	Sun XW, Yang QS, Liu HM, Wang XH ( 2018) Classification of plant associations based on a 20 hm ² dynamics plot of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Mt. Tiantong, Zhejiang, China . Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 42, 550-561. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 孙小伟, 杨庆松, 刘何铭, 王希华 ( 2018) 基于浙江天童20 hm ²常绿阔叶林动态监测样地的群丛划分 . 植物生态学报, 42, 550-561.]
[31]	Wang JM, Xu H, Li YD, Lin MX, Zhou Z, Luo TS, Chen DX ( 2018) Effects of topographic heterogeneity on community structure and diversity of woody plants in Jianfengling tropical montane rainforest. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 54(1), 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王家鸣, 许涵, 李意德, 林明献, 周璋, 骆土寿, 陈德祥 ( 2018) 地形异质性对尖峰岭热带山地雨林木本植物群落结构及多样性的影响. 林业科学, 54(1), 1-11.]
[32]	Wu ZY ( 1980) Vegetation of China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 吴征镒 ( 1980) 中国植被. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[33]	Yin X ( 2017) Research on the community productivity stability of artificial grassland in Tibetan Plateau. PhD dissertation, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 尹鑫 ( 2017) 青藏高原人工草地群落生产力稳定性研究. 博士学位论文, 兰州大学, 兰州.]
[34]	Zhang JT ( 1994) A comparison of Fuzzy C-means algorithm clustering and TWINSPAN in vegetatian classification. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 12, 11-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张金屯 ( 1994) 模糊C-均值聚类和TWINSPAN分类的比较研究. 武汉植物学研究, 12, 11-17.]
[35]	Zhang JT ( 1995) Quantitative Vegetation Ecology. China Science and Technology Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 张金屯 ( 1995) 植被数量生态学方法. 中国科学技术出版社, 北京.]
[36]	Zhang JT ( 2004) Quantitative Ecology. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 张金屯 ( 2004) 数量生态学. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[37]	Zhang LM, Chen B, Li ZY ( 2010) Analysis of the species diversity and community stability in local community using the Neutral Theory. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 1556-1563. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张立敏, 陈斌, 李正跃 ( 2010) 应用中性理论分析局域群落中的物种多样性及稳定性. 生态学报, 30, 1556-1563.]
[38]	Zhang P, Wang XJ, Wang Y, Qiao Y, Xu XL, Liao XL, Li J ( 2016) Community structure and stability of typical plantation in the mountains of Beijing. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 44(1), 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张鹏, 王新杰, 王勇, 乔永, 徐雪蕾, 廖祥龙, 李静 ( 2016) 北京山区3种典型人工林群落结构及稳定性. 东北林业大学学报, 44(1), 1-5.]
[39]	Zhang R, Liu T ( 2012) Plant species diversity and community classification in the southern Gurbantunggut Desert. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32, 6056-6066. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张荣, 刘彤 ( 2012) 古尔班通古特沙漠南部植物多样性及群落分类. 生态学报, 32, 6056-6066.]
[40]	Zhang WJ, Zhang QD, Wang J, Feng F, Bi RC ( 2015) A comparison of multivariate regression tree and two-way indicator species analysis in plant community classification. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 586-592. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张文静, 张钦弟, 王晶, 冯飞, 毕润成 ( 2015) 多元回归树与双向指示种分析在群落分类中的应用比较. 植物生态学报, 39, 586-592.]
[41]	Zhang ZH ( 2010) Ecological Research on Population and Community Stability in Karst Forest. PhD dissertation. East China Normal University, Shanghai. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张忠华 ( 2011) 喀斯特森林植被种群生态学与群落稳定性分析. 博士学位论文, 华东师范大学, 上海.]
[42]	Zheng YW ( 1999) Introduction to Mulun Karst Forest Region. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 郑颖吾 ( 1999) 木论喀斯特林区概论. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[43]	Zheng YR ( 2000) Comparison of methods for studying stability of forest community. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 36(5), 28-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 郑元润 ( 2000) 森林群落稳定性研究方法初探. 林业科学, 36(5), 28-32.]
[44]	Zhong JD, Li XK, Lü SH, Zeng DJ, Chen Y, Cheng XL ( 2011) The effects of the main environmental factors, the community stability in karst region of southwest Guangxi on the invasion of Eupatorium odoratum. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 20, 1819-1826. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 钟军弟, 李先琨, 吕仕洪, 曾丹娟, 陈燕, 成夏岚 ( 2011) 桂西南喀斯特区域群落主要环境因子及稳定性对飞机草入侵的影响. 生态环境学报, 20, 1819-1826.]

木论喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林群丛数量分类及稳定性

Numerical classification of associations and their stabilities of karst evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed forests in Mulun National Nature Reserve

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 44

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张楚然, 李生发, 李逢昌, 唐志忠, 刘辉燕, 王丽红, 顾荣, 邓云, 张志明, 林露湘. 云南鸡足山亚热带半湿润常绿阔叶林20 ha动态监测样地木本植物生境关联与群落数量分类[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23393-.
[2]	鲁梦珍, 曾馥平, 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 张浩, 苏樑, 刘坤平, 谭卫宁, 杜虎. 喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶林死亡个体空间分布格局及生境关联[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(4): 21340-.
[3]	施国杉, 刘峰, 陈典, 邓云, 林露湘. 云南纳板河热带季节雨林20 ha动态监测样地的树种组成与群落分类[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 10-20.
[4]	李霞, 朱万泽, 孙守琴, 舒树淼, 盛哲良, 张军, 刘亭, 张志才. 大渡河中游干暖河谷区生境对植物群落分布格局和多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(2): 117-127.
[5]	龚雪伟, 吕光辉. 艾比湖流域杜加依林荒漠植物群落多样性及优势种生态位[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(1): 34-45.
[6]	刘晔, 李鹏, 许玥, 石松林, 应凌霄, 张婉君, 彭培好, 沈泽昊. 中国西南干旱河谷植物群落的数量分类和排序分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(4): 378-388.
[7]	王炜, 裴浩, 王鑫厅. 优势种植被分类系统的逻辑分析与示例方案化[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(2): 136-147.
[8]	黄甫昭, 王斌, 丁涛, 向悟生, 李先琨, 周爱萍. 弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林群丛数量分类及与环境的关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(2): 157-166.