中国苔藓植物濒危等级的评估原则和评估结果

doi:10.17520/biods.2016205

生物多样性 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (7): 774-780. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016205

中国苔藓植物濒危等级的评估原则和评估结果

何强, 贾渝^*()

中国科学院植物研究所系统与进化植物学国家重点实验室, 北京 100093

收稿日期:2017-04-28 接受日期:2017-07-10 出版日期:2017-07-20 发布日期:2017-07-21
通讯作者: 贾渝
作者简介:具体评估过程包括信息汇总(各个渠道的标本信息、野外调查信息及文献资料)、逐条比对IUCN红色名录等级与标准、确定等级、填写评估说明。在具体评估过程中, 针对不同类群设计信息调查表, 通过电话和邮件向多位同行征询物种的居群信息。
基金资助:
环境保护部生物多样性保护专项——中国高等植物红色名录

Assessing the threat status of China’s bryophytes

Qiang He, Yu Jia^*()

State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093

Received:2017-04-28 Accepted:2017-07-10 Online:2017-07-20 Published:2017-07-21
Contact: Jia Yu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文阐述了中国苔藓植物濒危等级的评估原则。这一原则主要参考“IUCN物种红色名录濒危等级和标准(3.1版)”, 同时也吸收了其他苔藓学家的评估指南和结果。作者将10年内发表的新分类群暂评为数据缺乏(DD)等级, 根据馆藏标本份数估计栖息地物种成熟个体数。在此基础上, 对3,221个中国苔藓植物分类群进行评估, 结果为: 极危(CR) 16种; 濒危(EN) 58种; 易危(VU) 112种; 近危(NT) 214种; 无危(LC) 1,900种; 数据缺乏(DD) 921种。极危、濒危和易危等级的受威胁苔藓植物合计186种, 占中国苔藓植物种数的5.77%。

关键词: IUCN红色名录, 受威胁类群, 评估, 苔藓植物, 中国

Abstract

In this paper, the assessment principles of the endangered categories of Chinese bryophytes are expanded. This principle mainly refer to “IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1”, and also include results from other bryologists. The authors propose that those taxa published in the past ten years temporarily be classified as Data Deficient (DD), and estimate population sizes for all taxa be made based on herbarium specimens. A total of 3,221 taxa of Chinese bryophytes were evaluated based on the above principles and methods. Sixteen species were identified as Critically Endangered (CR), 58 species as Endangered (EN), 112 species as Vulnerable (VU), 214 species as Near Threatened (NT), 1,900 species as of Least Concern (LC), and 921 species are classified as Data Deficient (DD). Overall, 186 species of bryophytes (5.77% of the bryophytes found in China) were identified as threatened (including CR, EN, and VU).

Key words: IUCN Red List, threatened taxa, assessment, bryophyte, China

何强, 贾渝 (2017) 中国苔藓植物濒危等级的评估原则和评估结果. 生物多样性, 25, 774-780. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016205.

Qiang He, Yu Jia (2017) Assessing the threat status of China’s bryophytes. Biodiversity Science, 25, 774-780. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016205.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2016205

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2017/V25/I7/774

图/表 1

参考文献 31

1	Brotherus VF (1929) Botanische Ergebnisse der Expedition der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien nach Sudwest-China In Symbolae Sinicae. 1914/1918. IV. Musci. (ed. Handel-Mazzetti H), pp.1-147. Julius Springer, Berlin.
2	Cao T, Zhu RL, Guo SL, Zuo BR, Yu J (2006) A brief report of the first red list of endangered bryophytes in China. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 26, 756-762. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[曹同, 朱瑞良, 郭水良, 左本荣, 于晶 (2006) 中国首批濒危苔藓植物红色名录简报. 植物研究, 26, 756-762.]
3	Cao T, Zhu RL, Tan BC, Guo SL, Gao C, Wu PC, Li XJ (2006) A report of the first national red list of Chinese endangered bryophytes. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 99, 275-295.
4	Chalaud G (1932) Germination des spores et phase protonemique. In: Manual of Bryology Chapt. IV (ed. Verdoorn F), pp. 89-108. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
5	Chen PC (1958) Preliminary report of the ecological and geographical study of Chinese mossflora. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 7, 271-293. (in Chinese)
	[陈邦杰等(1958) 中国苔藓植物生态群落和地理分布的初步报告. 植物分类学报, 7, 271-293.]
6	Chen PC, Wu PC (1965) The preliminary study of the bryophytes of Mt. Hwangshan. In: Observations ad Florulam Hwangshanicam (eds Chen PC, Wu PC, Chiu PH, Hsu PS, Chow CL), pp. 1-59. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai. (in Chinese)
	[陈邦杰, 吴鹏程 (1965) 黄山苔藓植物的初步研究. 见: 《黄山植物的研究》(陈邦杰, 吴鹏程, 裘佩熹, 徐炳声, 周纪纶著), 1-59页. 上海科学技术出版社, 上海.]
7	Church JM, Hodgetts NG, Preston CD, Stewart NF (2001) British Red Data Books: Mosses and Liverworts. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.
8	Doyle WT (1970) The Biology of Higher Cryptogams. Macmillan, New York, and Collier Macmillan, London.
9	Eckstein J, Döbbeler P (2007) Fungal spores within sporophytes of Gymnostomum viridulum. Journal of Bryology, 29, 169-173.
10	Fife AJ, Glenny D, Beever JE, Braggins JE, Brownsey PJ, Renner MAM, Hitchmough R (2010) New Zealand’s threatened bryophytes: conservation efforts. Phytotaxa, 9, 275-278.
11	Gao C ( ed.) (1994) Flora Bryophytorum Sinicorum, Vol. 1. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[高谦 (主编) (1994) 《中国苔藓志》第一卷. 科学出版社, 北京.]
12	Gao C, Cao T ( ed.) (2000) Flora Yunnanica, Tomus 17 ( Bryophyta : Hepaticae, Anthocerotae). Science Press, Beijing . (in Chinese)
	[高谦, 曹同 (主编) (2000) 《云南植物志》17卷(苔藓植物: 苔纲、角苔纲) 科学出版社, 北京.]
13	Hallingbäck T, Hodgetts N, Raeymaekers G, Schumacker R, Sérgio, C, Söderström L, Stewart N, Vána (1998) Guidelines for application of the revised IUCN threat categories to bryophytes. Lindbergia, 23, 6-12.
14	Hallingbäck T, Hodgetts NG, Urmi E (1996) How to use the new IUCN Red List categories on bryophytes. Guidelines proposed by the IUCN SSC Bryophyte Specialist Group. Anales Del Instituto De Biología Serie Botánica, 67, 147.
15	Hasegawa J (1994a) A remarkable new species of Phaeoceros (Anthocerotae) with canaliculate-striate spore surfaces. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 75, 267-273.
16	Hasegawa J (1994b) New classification of Anthocerotae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 76, 21-34.
17	Hattori S (1947) Contributio ad Floram Hepaticarum Yakusimensem, II. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 2, 1-26.
18	Hattori S, Lin PJ (1985) A preliminary study of Chinese Frullania flora. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 59, 123-169.
19	IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1.IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK. [ii + 30 pp.]
20	IUCN (2010) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 8.0 (March2010). .
21	Jia Y (2017) Bryophytes In: Species Catalogue of China, Volume 1, Plants. A Provisional Checklist (Book one) (eds Wang LS, Jia Y, Zhang XC, Qin HN), Science Press, Beijing.
	(in Chinese) (in press)[贾渝 (2017) 苔藓植物. (见: 中国生物物种名录第一卷植物总名录(上册). (王利松, 贾渝, 张宪春, 覃海宁主编). 科学出版社. 北京] (印刷中)
22	Jia Y, Xu JM (2006) A new species and a new record of Brotherella (Musci, Sematophyllaceae) from China, with a key to the Chinese species of Brotherella. Bryologist, 109, 579-585.
23	Li JY, Zhang L, Zhou LP (2011) Phylogenetic position of the genus Hattorioceros (Anthoceratophyta). Taxon, 11, 1-4
24	Liu Y, Jia Y, Wang W, Chen CZ, Davis EC, Qiu YL (2008) Phylogenetic relationships of two endemic genera from East Asia: Trichocoleopsis and Neotrichocolea (Hepaticae). Annual of Missouri Botanical Garden, 95, 463-474.
25	Müller C (1896-98) Bryologia Provinciae Schen-si Sinensis. I. Nuovo Giornale Botanico Italiano, n.s., 3, 89-129.
26	Roads E, Longton RE, Convey P (2014) Millennial timescale regeneration in a moss from Antarctica. Current Biology, 24, 222-223.
27	Shi XQ, Wu KM, Zhang XP (2009) Studies on liverwort flora in Huangshan Mountain. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 27, 368-273. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[师雪芹, 吴开明, 张小平 (2009) 黄山苔类植物区系研究. 武汉植物学研究, 27, 368-372. ]
28	Wang DH, Wang YF, Zuo Q, Li M, Wei QQ, Li XQ, Zhao MS (2013) Comparison of bryophyte diversity in West Tianmu Mountain from 1977 to 2011. Biodiversity Science, 21, 170-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[汪岱华, 王幼芳, 左勤, 李敏, 魏倩倩, 李晓芹, 赵明水 (2013) 浙江西天目山30年来苔藓物种多样性变化. 生物多样性, 21, 170-176.]
29	Zhang L, Zhou LP, Li JY (2011) The genus Hattorioceros (Notothyladaceae) new to China. The Bryologist, 114, 190-193.
30	Zhang XQ, Zhu RL, Huang ZS, ChenYT, Chen WW (2011) Liverworts and Hornworts of Fujian, China: An Updated Checklist and Bryofloristic Accounts. Plant Diversity, 33, 101-122. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张晓青, 朱瑞良, 黄志森, 陈允泰, 陈文伟 (2011) 福建苔类和角苔类最新名录与区系分析. 植物分类与资源学报, 33, 101-122.]
31	Zhu RL, So ML, Ye LX (1998) A synopsis of the Hepaticae flora of Zhejiang, China. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 84, 159-174.

[1]	吴相獐, 雷富民, 单壹壹, 于晶. 上海城市公园苔藓植物多样性分布格局及其环境影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23364-0.
[2]	邓晶, 李艺, 侯一蕾. 城市生物多样性保护: 基于中欧对比视角下的经验借鉴[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23070-.
[3]	朱建国, 王林, 任国鹏. 《国家重点保护野生动物名录》调整的评估方法探讨[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23045-.
[4]	廖美哲, 张宗文, 白可喻. 中国农业生态系统多样性保护研究现状与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 23017-.
[5]	王江, 赵一凡, 屈彦福, 张财文, 张亮, 陈传武, 王彦平. 中国蛇类形态、生活史和生态学特征数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 23126-.
[6]	董庆栋, 陈超男, 李艳红, 赵体侠, 孙梓欣, 张哲, 朱连奇. 基于NPP和人类扰动指数评估河南伏牛山地区国家级自然保护区群保护成效与溢出/泄漏效应[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22503-.
[7]	邓昶, 郝杰威, 高德, 任明迅, 张莉娜. 海南受威胁苔藓植物适生热点区域识别与保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22580-.
[8]	陈星, 涂淑雯, 戴尊, 高爽, 王幼芳, 邢诗晨, 魏博嘉, 唐录艳, 师瑞萍, 王晓蕊, 刘永英, 赵东平, 唐霞, 姚雪, 赵明水, 吴晗星, 祁祥斌, 张健, 李敏, 王健. 浙江天目山国家级自然保护区苔藓植物多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22649-.
[9]	姚雪, 陈星, 戴尊, 宋坤, 邢诗晨, 曹宏彧, 邹璐, 王健. 采集策略对叶附生苔类植物发现概率及物种多样性的重要性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22685-.
[10]	李钊丞, 张燕雪丹. 基于物种濒危状况评价与种群增长的一种新评估方法在水生野生动物保护司法中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22319-.
[11]	申小虎, 朱翔宇, 史洪飞, 王传之. 基于机器学习鸟声识别算法研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23272-.
[12]	王科, 蔡磊. 世界菌物新命名发表概况(2022年)[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(10): 23176-.
[13]	林晨, 蔡小东, 王亮, 张冰, 杨棋程, 吴艳玲, 杨定. 2022年中国双翅目新分类单元[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(10): 23245-.
[14]	张富华, 席菲, 汤芯蕊, 岑鹏, 吴诗宝. 穿山甲肉在中国大陆的非法贸易网络及对其实施关键干预措施的启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(10): 23079-.
[15]	周璇, 罗一平, 金子, 乔宇晴, 张艺瑶, 李露露, 路园园, 刘宁, 刘梅柯, 白明. 2022年全球鞘翅目现生类群新分类单元[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(10): 23202-.

中国苔藓植物濒危等级的评估原则和评估结果

Assessing the threat status of China’s bryophytes

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价