生物多样性 ›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 677-687. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.11088
高建云1,2, 吴兆录1, 张强2, 苏栋栋1,2, 赵仁东3, 邹发生2,*()
收稿日期:
2013-04-09
接受日期:
2013-05-30
出版日期:
2013-11-20
发布日期:
2013-12-02
通讯作者:
邹发生
基金资助:
Jianyun Gao1,2, Zhaolu Wu1, Qiang Zhang2, Dongdong Su1,2, Rendong Zhao3, Fasheng Zou2,*()
Received:
2013-04-09
Accepted:
2013-05-30
Online:
2013-11-20
Published:
2013-12-02
Contact:
Zou Fasheng
摘要:
为探讨边缘效应对热带常绿季雨林鸟类群落的影响, 作者以海南猴猕岭省级自然保护区次生林为研究对象, 设置距离森林边缘0-100 m(边缘带)、101-300 m(中间带)、301-500 m(内部带)的距离梯度, 采用固定样点法和网捕法调查、比较其中的鸟类群落, 分析次生林由边缘至内部不同距离梯度中鸟类群落组成与功能集团的异同。2010至2012年调查期间共记录93种鸟类。不同距离梯度中每个样点记录的平均物种数和平均个体数均存在显著差异, 都是中间带最高、内部带次之、边缘带最低。森林专性种主要分布在中间带和内部带, 这些种的数量也显著高于边缘带; 森林广幅种主要分布在边缘带和中间带, 其数量以中间带最丰富; 非森林鸟类主要集中在边缘带, 其数量明显高于中间带和内部带。食果鸟以内部带最高、中间带次之、边缘带最低; 林下层食虫鸟、垂直层食虫鸟和食花蜜鸟在中间带最高、内部带次之、边缘带最低; 地面食虫鸟和杂食性鸟, 以边缘带最高、中间带次之、内部带最低; 食谷鸟主要分布在边缘带中, 中间带和内部带很少。食果鸟、食虫鸟和食花蜜鸟对森林的边缘敏感、逃避边缘栖息地, 而食谷鸟和杂食性鸟偏好边缘栖息地。总之, 边缘效应对海南岛森林鸟类多样性产生负效应。
高建云, 吴兆录, 张强, 苏栋栋, 赵仁东, 邹发生 (2013) 海南热带雨林次生林边缘至林内鸟类群落组成与功能集团比较. 生物多样性, 21, 677-687. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.11088.
Jianyun Gao,Zhaolu Wu,Qiang Zhang,Dongdong Su,Rendong Zhao,Fasheng Zou (2013) Comparison of compositions and functional guilds of bird communities across an edge-interior gradient in secondary forest at Houmiling, Hainan Island, China. Biodiversity Science, 21, 677-687. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.11088.
图3 不同距离梯度中基于样点数据(a)和网捕数据(b)的物种累积稀疏曲线图
Fig. 3 Sample-based rarefaction curves for point count (a) and mist net (b) data for the different distance gradients from the forest edge
图4 不同距离梯度每个样点的平均物种数和个体数(mean ± SE) (虚线左侧)及每张网的平均网捕率(mean ± SE) (虚线右侧)比较。柱状图上方的不同小写字母表示0.05水平上差异显著。
Fig. 4 The mean number (mean ± SE) of species and individuals per point among the three sampling transects (left side of the dotted line), and differences in the mean capture rate (mean ± SE) of birds per net between the two sampling transects (right side of the dotted line). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level.
图5 不同距离梯度的调查样点及样点法调查到的鸟类物种的PCA二维排序图(鸟种编号详见附录I)
Fig. 5 PCA ordination plot of sampling points and species among the three sampling transects in a two dimensional ordinal space (See Appendix I for species codes)
图6 不同距离梯度中森林依赖性类群(虚线左侧)以及生境利用集团(虚线右侧)在每个样点的平均个体数(mean ± SE)。FD、FG、NF分别表示森林专性种、森林广幅种、非森林鸟类; UB: 林下层利用集团; OHU: 开阔地利用集团; VPG: 垂直广泛层利用集团; GU: 地面活动集团; SU: 灌丛利用集团。柱状图上方的不同小写字母表示两者间在0.05水平上差异显著。
Fig. 6 The mean bird number (mean ± SE) per point grouped by forest-dependent category (left side of the dotted line) and habitat-use guild (right side of the dotted line) for the three sa- mpling transects at Houmiling. FD, Forest-dependent species; FG, Forest generalists; NF, Non-forest species; UB, Understory birds; OHU, Open-habitat users; VPG, Vertical-profile gene- ralists; GU, Ground users; SU, Shrub users. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level.
图7 不同距离梯度中觅食食性集团每个样点的平均个体数(mean ± SE)。UI: 林下层食虫鸟; TI: 垂直层食虫鸟; N: 食花蜜鸟; F: 食果鸟; GI: 地面食虫鸟; O: 杂食性鸟; G: 食谷鸟。柱状图上方的不同小写字母表示两者间在0.05水平上差异显著。
Fig. 7 The mean bird number per point (mean ± SE) grouped by foraging and dietary guild for the three sampling transects at Houmiling. UI, Understory insectivores; TI, Tree insectivores; N, Nectarivores; F, Frugivores; GI, Ground insectivores; O, Omnivores; G, Granivores. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level.
编号 Codes | 种名和学名 Common and scientific name | 森林依赖性类群 ForDep 1 | 生境利用 集团 HabGui 2 | 觅食食性 集团 FeeGuil 3 | 样点记录 Point counts | 网捕 Mist nets | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
边缘带 Edge band n = 40 | 中间带 Intermediate band n = 40 | 内部带 Interior band n = 40 | 中间带 Intermediate band n = 10 | 内部带 Interior band n = 6 | ||||||
S1 | 苍鹭 Ardea cinerea | NF | OHU | C | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S2 | 大白鹭 A. alba | NF | OHU | C | 0.30 ± 0.21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S3 | 白鹭 Egretta garzetta | NF | OHU | C | 0.15 ± 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S4 | 牛背鹭 Bubulcus ibis | NF | OHU | GI | 0.15 ± 0.15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S5 | 海南山鹧鸪 Arborophila ardens | FD | GU | O | 0 | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0.20 ± 0.12 | 0 | 0 | |
S6 | 原鸡 Gallus gallus | FD | GU | O | 0.20 ± 0.15 | 0.20 ± 0.06 | 0.23 ± 0.08 | 0 | 0 | |
S7 | 普通燕鸻 Glareola maldivarum | NF | OHU | GI | 0.15 ± 0.13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S8 | 白腰草鹬 Tringa ochropus | NF | OHU | C | 0.10 ± 0.10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S9 | 珠颈斑鸠 Streptopelia chinensis * | NF | OHU | G | 6.30 ± 1.35a | 0.20 ± 0.07b | 0.05 ± 0.05b | 0 | 0 | |
S10 | 绿翅金鸠 Chalcophaps indica | FD | VPG | F | 0 | 0 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.074 | 0 | |
S11 | 绿嘴地鹃 Phaenicophaeus tristis | FG | GU | GI | 0.35 ± 0.13 | 0.33 ± 0.12 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.023 | 0 | |
S12 | 褐翅鸦鹃 Centropus sinensis | NF | SU | SI | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S13 | 小鸦鹃 C. bengalensis | NF | SU | SI | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S14 | 红头咬鹃 Harpactes erythrocephalus | FD | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | |
S15 | 普通翠鸟 Alcedo atthis * | NF | OHU | C | 0.40 ± 0.13a | 0b | 0b | 0 | 0 | |
S16 | 白胸翡翠 Halcyon smyrnensis * | NF | OHU | C | 0.15 ± 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 0.023 | 0 | |
S17 | 蓝须夜蜂虎 Nyctyornis athertoni | FD | VPG | TI | 0.35 ± 0.09 | 0.23 ± 0.08 | 0.35 ± 0.11 | 0 | 0 | |
S18 | 三宝鸟 Eurystomus orientalis | FG | VPG | TI | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S19 | 戴胜 Upupa epops | NF | OHU | GI | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S20 | 黑眉拟啄木鸟 Megalaima oorti * | FD | VPG | F | 0b | 0b | 0.60 ± 0.12a | 0 | 0 | |
S21 | 栗啄木鸟 Celeus brachyurus | FD | VPG | TI | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.25 ± 0.11 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.023 | 0.028 | |
S22 | 黄嘴栗啄木鸟 Blythipicus pyrrhotis | FD | VPG | TI | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | |
S23 | 银胸丝冠鸟 Serilophus lunatus | FD | VPG | TI | 0 | 0 | 0.18 ± 0.18 | 0 | 0 | |
S24 | 白鹡鸰 Motacilla alba * | NF | OHU | GI | 1.13 ± 0.32a | 0.13 ± 0.08b | 0.05 ± 0.05b | 0 | 0 | |
S25 | 灰鹡鸰 M. cinerea | NF | OHU | GI | 0.55 ± 0.20a | 0.15 ± 0.05b | 0.05 ± 0.03b | 0 | 0.033 | |
S26 | 树鹨 Anthus hodgsoni | NF | OHU | GI | 0.30 ± 0.15 | 0.18 ± 0.15 | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.027 | 0 | |
S27 | 灰山椒鸟 Pericrocotus divaricatus ** | FG | VPG | TI | 0.25 ± 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S28 | 赤红山椒鸟 P. flammeus * | FG | VPG | TI | 1.40 ± 0.68b | 3.30 ± 0.63a | 2.55 ± 0.53ab | 0 | 0 | |
S29 | 灰喉山椒鸟 P. solaris | FG | VPG | TI | 0 | 0 | 0.10 ± 0.10 | 0 | 0 | |
S30 | 白头鹎 Pycnonotus sinensis * | NF | OHU | O | 18.95 ± 2.85a | 4.83 ± 1.08b | 2.23 ± 0.42b | 2.49 | 0.17 | |
S31 | 白喉冠鹎 Alophoixus pallidus * | FD | VPG | F | 0.65 ± 0.28b | 3.38 ± 0.59a | 3.08 ± 0.61a | 0.05 | 0.538 | |
S32 | 栗背短脚鹎 Hemixos castanonotus * | FD | VPG | F | 0b | 1.00 ± 0.37b | 5.30 ± 1.02a | 0.023 | 0.099 | |
S33 | 黑短脚鹎 Hypsipetes leucocephalus | FD | VPG | F | 0 | 0.15 ± 0.15 | 0.50 ± 0.35 | 0 | 0 | |
S34 | 橙腹叶鹎 Chloropsis hardwickii * | FD | VPG | TI | 0b | 0.05 ± 0.05b | 0.33 ± 0.12a | 0 | 0 | |
S35 | 红尾伯劳 Lanius cristatus | NF | OHU | TI | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0.027 | 0 | |
S36 | 棕背伯劳 L. schach * | NF | OHU | TI | 1.40 ± 0.19a | 0.08 ± 0.04b | 0b | 0.12 | 0 | |
S37 | 黑卷尾 Dicrurus macrocercus | FG | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S38 | 灰卷尾 D. leucophaeus | FG | VPG | TI | 0.10 ± 0.10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S39 | 古铜色卷尾 D. aeneus | FD | VPG | TI | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.15 ± 0.08 | 0.25 ± 0.11 | 0 | 0 | |
S40 | 大盘尾 D. paradiseus | FD | VPG | TI | 0.18 ± 0.09b | 0.43 ± 0.14a | 0.80 ± 0.23a | 0.083 | 0.092 | |
S41 | 八哥 Acridotheres cristatellus | NF | OHU | GI | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S42 | 黄胸绿鹊 Cissa hypoleuca * | FD | VPG | O | 0b | 0.43 ± 0.17a | 0.10 ± 0.07ab | 0.109 | 0 | |
S43 | 灰树鹊 Dendrocitta formosae * | FD | VPG | O | 0.45 ± 0.19b | 0.98 ± 0.22a | 0.50 ± 0.14b | 0.025 | 0 | |
S44 | 红尾歌鸲 Luscinia sibilans | FG | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.027 | 0.066 | |
S45 | 红喉歌鸲 L. calliope | FG | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.027 | 0 | |
S46 | 蓝歌鸲 L. cyane | FG | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.031 | |
S47 | 红胁蓝尾鸲 Tarsiger cyanurus | FG | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.033 | |
S48 | 鹊鸲 Copsychus saularis * | NF | OHU | GI | 0.78 ± 0.17a | 0.15 ± 0.08b | 0b | 0.023 | 0 | |
S49 | 白腰鹊鸲 C. malabaricus | FD | GU | GI | 0.90 ± 0.20ab | 1.33 ± 0.18a | 0.60 ± 0.16b | 1.119 | 0.639 | |
S50 | 红尾水鸲 Rhyacornis fuliginosus | NF | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.027 | 0 | |
S51 | 黑喉石鵖 Saxicola torquata | NF | SU | SI | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S52 | 蓝矶鸫 Monticola solitarius | NF | GU | GI | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S53 | 橙头地鸫 Zoothera citrina | FD | GU | GI | 0 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.544 | |
S54 | 乌灰鸫 Turdus cardis | FG | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.053 | 0 | |
S55 | 乌鸫 T. merula | NF | GU | GI | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0.058 | 0 | |
S56 | 北灰鹟 Muscicapa dauurica * | FG | VPG | TI | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S57 | 白眉姬鹟 Ficedula zanthopygia | FG | SU | SI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.049 | 0 | |
S58 | 鸲姬鹟 F. mugimaki | FG | VPG | TI | 0.10 ± 0.05 | 0.23 ± 0.12 | 0 | 0 | 0.033 | |
S59 | 红喉姬鹟 F. albicilla | FG | SU | SI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.033 | |
S60 | 棕胸蓝姬鹟 F. hyperythra | FD | SU | SI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.023 | 0.113 | |
S61 | 海南蓝仙鹟 Cyornis hainanus * | FD | UB | UI | 0.30 ± 0.08b | 1.15 ± 0.19a | 0.68 ± 0.16b | 0.428 | 0.193 | |
S62 | 白喉扇尾鹟 Rhipidura albicollis * | FD | UB | UI | 0.40 ± 0.15b | 2.20 ± 0.29a | 1.90 ± 0.40a | 0.314 | 0.727 | |
S63 | 黑枕王鹟 Hypothymis azurea * | FD | UB | UI | 0.03 ± 0.03b | 0.43 ± 0.13ab | 0.63 ± 0.23a | 0.244 | 0 | |
S64 | 寿带 Terpsiphone paradisi | FD | UB | UI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.027 | 0 | |
S65 | 小黑领噪鹛 Garrulax monileger | FD | UB | UI | 3.40 ± 1.10 | 5.48 ± 1.35 | 4.95 ± 1.40 | 0.806 | 0.175 | |
S66 | 黑领噪鹛 G. pectoralis | FD | UB | UI | 3.45 ± 1.12 | 5.58 ± 1.33 | 4.70 ± 1.45 | 0.053 | 0.094 | |
S67 | 褐胸噪鹛 G. maesi * | FD | UB | UI | 0.50 ± 0.23b | 4.20 ± 0.81a | 4.08 ± 0.77a | 0 | 0.087 | |
S68 | 黑喉噪鹛 G. chinensis | FD | UB | UI | 2.03 ± 0.50 | 2.63 ± 0.56 | 2.23 ± 0.52 | 0.209 | 0.028 | |
S69 | 长嘴钩嘴鹛 Pomatorhinus hypoleucos * | FD | UB | UI | 0b | 0.95 ± 0.30a | 1.05 ± 0.25a | 0 | 0.087 | |
S70 | 棕颈钩嘴鹛 P. ruficollis * | FD | UB | UI | 0.23 ± 0.15b | 3.08 ± 0.64a | 2.13 ± 0.58a | 0.027 | 0.09 | |
S71 | 红头穗鹛 Stachyris ruficeps * | FD | UB | TI | 0.35 ± 0.21b | 2.78 ± 0.56a | 2.98 ± 0.55a | 0.023 | 0.09 | |
S72 | 斑颈穗鹛 S. striolata | FD | UB | UI | 0 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0 | 0.066 | |
S73 | 栗额鵙鹛 Pteruthius aenobarbus | FD | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S74 | 褐顶雀鹛 Alcippe brunnea * | FD | UB | UI | 0b | 0.63 ± 0.25a | 0.98 ± 0.29a | 0 | 0.198 | |
S75 | 灰眶雀鹛 A. morrisonia * | FD | UB | UI | 3.85 ± 1.37b | 19.58 ± 2.93a | 13.33 ± 2.79a | 1.32 | 1.672 | |
S76 | 白腹凤鹛 Erpornis zantholeuca * | FD | VPG | TI | 1.00 ± 0.47b | 6.20 ± 0.93a | 5.90 ± 1.14a | 0.023 | 0.105 | |
S77 | 灰头鸦雀 Paradoxornis gularis | FG | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.45 ± 0.45 | 0.50 ± 0.37 | 0 | 0 | |
S78 | 黄腹山鹪莺 Prinia flaviventris * | NF | SU | SI | 0.63 ± 0.15a | 0.03 ± 0.03b | 0b | 0 | 0 | |
S79 | 鳞头树莺 Urosphena squameiceps | FG | UB | TI | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0.08 | 0.066 | |
S80 | 褐柳莺 Phylloscopus fuscatus * | FG | SU | TI | 0.10 ± 0.05 | 0.10 ± 0.06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S81 | 黄眉柳莺 P. inornatus | FG | VPG | TI | 0.35 ± 0.10 | 0.53 ± 0.14 | 0.50 ± 0.11 | 0.085 | 0.066 | |
S82 | 极北柳莺 P. borealis * | FG | VPG | TI | 0a | 0.38 ± 0.12b | 0.40 ± 0.17ab | 0.051 | 0 | |
S83 | 双斑绿柳莺 P. plumbeitarsus | FG | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.13 ± 0.13 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.08 | 0 | |
S84 | 淡脚柳莺 P. tenellipes | FG | VPG | TI | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.13 ± 0.06 | 0.18 ± 0.10 | 0.078 | 0 | |
S85 | 红胁绣眼鸟 Zosterops erythropleurus | FG | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S86 | 暗绿绣眼鸟 Z. japonicus * | FG | VPG | TI | 3.38 ± 0.86b | 5.85 ± 1.00a | 3.53 ± 0.75ab | 0.08 | 0 | |
S87 | 大山雀 Parus major * | FG | VPG | TI | 1.08 ± 0.30a | 0.58 ± 0.17a | 0b | 0 | 0 | |
S88 | 纯色啄花鸟 Dicaeum concolor | FG | VPG | N | 0 | 0.45 ± 0.31 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | |
S89 | 朱背啄花鸟 D. cruentatum | FG | VPG | N | 0.75 ± 0.17ab | 1.20 ± 0.36a | 0.48 ± 0.12b | 0.078 | 0.033 | |
S90 | 黄腹花蜜鸟 Cinnyris jugularis | FG | VPG | N | 1.73 ± 0.39 | 2.73 ± 0.44 | 2.65 ± 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.028 | |
S91 | 叉尾太阳鸟 Aethopyga christinae * | FG | VPG | N | 0.03 ± 0.03b | 0.65 ± 0.19a | 1.03 ± 0.24a | 0 | 0 | |
S92 | 白腰文鸟 Lonchura striata * | NF | OHU | G | 7.00 ± 1.54a | 0b | 0b | 0 | 0 | |
S93 | 斑文鸟 L. punctulata * | NF | OHU | G | 2.30 ± 0.89a | 0b | 0b | 0 | 0 |
附录I 海南猴猕岭省级自然保护区鸟类名录(2010-2012)。表中每个物种样点记录栏的数据表示每个样点所记录的平均个体数(mean ± SE), 网捕栏数据表示每100网·时所捕到的鸟个体数。鸟种名称及排列顺序参考郑光美(2011)。
Appendix I The bird checklist of the three sampling transects at the Houmiling Nature Reserve, August 2010 to September 2012. For each species, the point count numbers represent the mean number (mean ± SE) of individuals counted at each sampling point and the capture numbers represent the number of individuals caught per 100 net hours. Scientific and common names follow Zheng (2011).
编号 Codes | 种名和学名 Common and scientific name | 森林依赖性类群 ForDep 1 | 生境利用 集团 HabGui 2 | 觅食食性 集团 FeeGuil 3 | 样点记录 Point counts | 网捕 Mist nets | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
边缘带 Edge band n = 40 | 中间带 Intermediate band n = 40 | 内部带 Interior band n = 40 | 中间带 Intermediate band n = 10 | 内部带 Interior band n = 6 | ||||||
S1 | 苍鹭 Ardea cinerea | NF | OHU | C | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S2 | 大白鹭 A. alba | NF | OHU | C | 0.30 ± 0.21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S3 | 白鹭 Egretta garzetta | NF | OHU | C | 0.15 ± 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S4 | 牛背鹭 Bubulcus ibis | NF | OHU | GI | 0.15 ± 0.15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S5 | 海南山鹧鸪 Arborophila ardens | FD | GU | O | 0 | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0.20 ± 0.12 | 0 | 0 | |
S6 | 原鸡 Gallus gallus | FD | GU | O | 0.20 ± 0.15 | 0.20 ± 0.06 | 0.23 ± 0.08 | 0 | 0 | |
S7 | 普通燕鸻 Glareola maldivarum | NF | OHU | GI | 0.15 ± 0.13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S8 | 白腰草鹬 Tringa ochropus | NF | OHU | C | 0.10 ± 0.10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S9 | 珠颈斑鸠 Streptopelia chinensis * | NF | OHU | G | 6.30 ± 1.35a | 0.20 ± 0.07b | 0.05 ± 0.05b | 0 | 0 | |
S10 | 绿翅金鸠 Chalcophaps indica | FD | VPG | F | 0 | 0 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.074 | 0 | |
S11 | 绿嘴地鹃 Phaenicophaeus tristis | FG | GU | GI | 0.35 ± 0.13 | 0.33 ± 0.12 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.023 | 0 | |
S12 | 褐翅鸦鹃 Centropus sinensis | NF | SU | SI | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S13 | 小鸦鹃 C. bengalensis | NF | SU | SI | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S14 | 红头咬鹃 Harpactes erythrocephalus | FD | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | |
S15 | 普通翠鸟 Alcedo atthis * | NF | OHU | C | 0.40 ± 0.13a | 0b | 0b | 0 | 0 | |
S16 | 白胸翡翠 Halcyon smyrnensis * | NF | OHU | C | 0.15 ± 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 0.023 | 0 | |
S17 | 蓝须夜蜂虎 Nyctyornis athertoni | FD | VPG | TI | 0.35 ± 0.09 | 0.23 ± 0.08 | 0.35 ± 0.11 | 0 | 0 | |
S18 | 三宝鸟 Eurystomus orientalis | FG | VPG | TI | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S19 | 戴胜 Upupa epops | NF | OHU | GI | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S20 | 黑眉拟啄木鸟 Megalaima oorti * | FD | VPG | F | 0b | 0b | 0.60 ± 0.12a | 0 | 0 | |
S21 | 栗啄木鸟 Celeus brachyurus | FD | VPG | TI | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.25 ± 0.11 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.023 | 0.028 | |
S22 | 黄嘴栗啄木鸟 Blythipicus pyrrhotis | FD | VPG | TI | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | |
S23 | 银胸丝冠鸟 Serilophus lunatus | FD | VPG | TI | 0 | 0 | 0.18 ± 0.18 | 0 | 0 | |
S24 | 白鹡鸰 Motacilla alba * | NF | OHU | GI | 1.13 ± 0.32a | 0.13 ± 0.08b | 0.05 ± 0.05b | 0 | 0 | |
S25 | 灰鹡鸰 M. cinerea | NF | OHU | GI | 0.55 ± 0.20a | 0.15 ± 0.05b | 0.05 ± 0.03b | 0 | 0.033 | |
S26 | 树鹨 Anthus hodgsoni | NF | OHU | GI | 0.30 ± 0.15 | 0.18 ± 0.15 | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.027 | 0 | |
S27 | 灰山椒鸟 Pericrocotus divaricatus ** | FG | VPG | TI | 0.25 ± 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S28 | 赤红山椒鸟 P. flammeus * | FG | VPG | TI | 1.40 ± 0.68b | 3.30 ± 0.63a | 2.55 ± 0.53ab | 0 | 0 | |
S29 | 灰喉山椒鸟 P. solaris | FG | VPG | TI | 0 | 0 | 0.10 ± 0.10 | 0 | 0 | |
S30 | 白头鹎 Pycnonotus sinensis * | NF | OHU | O | 18.95 ± 2.85a | 4.83 ± 1.08b | 2.23 ± 0.42b | 2.49 | 0.17 | |
S31 | 白喉冠鹎 Alophoixus pallidus * | FD | VPG | F | 0.65 ± 0.28b | 3.38 ± 0.59a | 3.08 ± 0.61a | 0.05 | 0.538 | |
S32 | 栗背短脚鹎 Hemixos castanonotus * | FD | VPG | F | 0b | 1.00 ± 0.37b | 5.30 ± 1.02a | 0.023 | 0.099 | |
S33 | 黑短脚鹎 Hypsipetes leucocephalus | FD | VPG | F | 0 | 0.15 ± 0.15 | 0.50 ± 0.35 | 0 | 0 | |
S34 | 橙腹叶鹎 Chloropsis hardwickii * | FD | VPG | TI | 0b | 0.05 ± 0.05b | 0.33 ± 0.12a | 0 | 0 | |
S35 | 红尾伯劳 Lanius cristatus | NF | OHU | TI | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0.027 | 0 | |
S36 | 棕背伯劳 L. schach * | NF | OHU | TI | 1.40 ± 0.19a | 0.08 ± 0.04b | 0b | 0.12 | 0 | |
S37 | 黑卷尾 Dicrurus macrocercus | FG | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S38 | 灰卷尾 D. leucophaeus | FG | VPG | TI | 0.10 ± 0.10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S39 | 古铜色卷尾 D. aeneus | FD | VPG | TI | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.15 ± 0.08 | 0.25 ± 0.11 | 0 | 0 | |
S40 | 大盘尾 D. paradiseus | FD | VPG | TI | 0.18 ± 0.09b | 0.43 ± 0.14a | 0.80 ± 0.23a | 0.083 | 0.092 | |
S41 | 八哥 Acridotheres cristatellus | NF | OHU | GI | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S42 | 黄胸绿鹊 Cissa hypoleuca * | FD | VPG | O | 0b | 0.43 ± 0.17a | 0.10 ± 0.07ab | 0.109 | 0 | |
S43 | 灰树鹊 Dendrocitta formosae * | FD | VPG | O | 0.45 ± 0.19b | 0.98 ± 0.22a | 0.50 ± 0.14b | 0.025 | 0 | |
S44 | 红尾歌鸲 Luscinia sibilans | FG | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.027 | 0.066 | |
S45 | 红喉歌鸲 L. calliope | FG | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.027 | 0 | |
S46 | 蓝歌鸲 L. cyane | FG | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.031 | |
S47 | 红胁蓝尾鸲 Tarsiger cyanurus | FG | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.033 | |
S48 | 鹊鸲 Copsychus saularis * | NF | OHU | GI | 0.78 ± 0.17a | 0.15 ± 0.08b | 0b | 0.023 | 0 | |
S49 | 白腰鹊鸲 C. malabaricus | FD | GU | GI | 0.90 ± 0.20ab | 1.33 ± 0.18a | 0.60 ± 0.16b | 1.119 | 0.639 | |
S50 | 红尾水鸲 Rhyacornis fuliginosus | NF | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.027 | 0 | |
S51 | 黑喉石鵖 Saxicola torquata | NF | SU | SI | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S52 | 蓝矶鸫 Monticola solitarius | NF | GU | GI | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S53 | 橙头地鸫 Zoothera citrina | FD | GU | GI | 0 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.544 | |
S54 | 乌灰鸫 Turdus cardis | FG | GU | GI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.053 | 0 | |
S55 | 乌鸫 T. merula | NF | GU | GI | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0.058 | 0 | |
S56 | 北灰鹟 Muscicapa dauurica * | FG | VPG | TI | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S57 | 白眉姬鹟 Ficedula zanthopygia | FG | SU | SI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.049 | 0 | |
S58 | 鸲姬鹟 F. mugimaki | FG | VPG | TI | 0.10 ± 0.05 | 0.23 ± 0.12 | 0 | 0 | 0.033 | |
S59 | 红喉姬鹟 F. albicilla | FG | SU | SI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.033 | |
S60 | 棕胸蓝姬鹟 F. hyperythra | FD | SU | SI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.023 | 0.113 | |
S61 | 海南蓝仙鹟 Cyornis hainanus * | FD | UB | UI | 0.30 ± 0.08b | 1.15 ± 0.19a | 0.68 ± 0.16b | 0.428 | 0.193 | |
S62 | 白喉扇尾鹟 Rhipidura albicollis * | FD | UB | UI | 0.40 ± 0.15b | 2.20 ± 0.29a | 1.90 ± 0.40a | 0.314 | 0.727 | |
S63 | 黑枕王鹟 Hypothymis azurea * | FD | UB | UI | 0.03 ± 0.03b | 0.43 ± 0.13ab | 0.63 ± 0.23a | 0.244 | 0 | |
S64 | 寿带 Terpsiphone paradisi | FD | UB | UI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.027 | 0 | |
S65 | 小黑领噪鹛 Garrulax monileger | FD | UB | UI | 3.40 ± 1.10 | 5.48 ± 1.35 | 4.95 ± 1.40 | 0.806 | 0.175 | |
S66 | 黑领噪鹛 G. pectoralis | FD | UB | UI | 3.45 ± 1.12 | 5.58 ± 1.33 | 4.70 ± 1.45 | 0.053 | 0.094 | |
S67 | 褐胸噪鹛 G. maesi * | FD | UB | UI | 0.50 ± 0.23b | 4.20 ± 0.81a | 4.08 ± 0.77a | 0 | 0.087 | |
S68 | 黑喉噪鹛 G. chinensis | FD | UB | UI | 2.03 ± 0.50 | 2.63 ± 0.56 | 2.23 ± 0.52 | 0.209 | 0.028 | |
S69 | 长嘴钩嘴鹛 Pomatorhinus hypoleucos * | FD | UB | UI | 0b | 0.95 ± 0.30a | 1.05 ± 0.25a | 0 | 0.087 | |
S70 | 棕颈钩嘴鹛 P. ruficollis * | FD | UB | UI | 0.23 ± 0.15b | 3.08 ± 0.64a | 2.13 ± 0.58a | 0.027 | 0.09 | |
S71 | 红头穗鹛 Stachyris ruficeps * | FD | UB | TI | 0.35 ± 0.21b | 2.78 ± 0.56a | 2.98 ± 0.55a | 0.023 | 0.09 | |
S72 | 斑颈穗鹛 S. striolata | FD | UB | UI | 0 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0 | 0.066 | |
S73 | 栗额鵙鹛 Pteruthius aenobarbus | FD | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S74 | 褐顶雀鹛 Alcippe brunnea * | FD | UB | UI | 0b | 0.63 ± 0.25a | 0.98 ± 0.29a | 0 | 0.198 | |
S75 | 灰眶雀鹛 A. morrisonia * | FD | UB | UI | 3.85 ± 1.37b | 19.58 ± 2.93a | 13.33 ± 2.79a | 1.32 | 1.672 | |
S76 | 白腹凤鹛 Erpornis zantholeuca * | FD | VPG | TI | 1.00 ± 0.47b | 6.20 ± 0.93a | 5.90 ± 1.14a | 0.023 | 0.105 | |
S77 | 灰头鸦雀 Paradoxornis gularis | FG | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.45 ± 0.45 | 0.50 ± 0.37 | 0 | 0 | |
S78 | 黄腹山鹪莺 Prinia flaviventris * | NF | SU | SI | 0.63 ± 0.15a | 0.03 ± 0.03b | 0b | 0 | 0 | |
S79 | 鳞头树莺 Urosphena squameiceps | FG | UB | TI | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0.08 | 0.066 | |
S80 | 褐柳莺 Phylloscopus fuscatus * | FG | SU | TI | 0.10 ± 0.05 | 0.10 ± 0.06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S81 | 黄眉柳莺 P. inornatus | FG | VPG | TI | 0.35 ± 0.10 | 0.53 ± 0.14 | 0.50 ± 0.11 | 0.085 | 0.066 | |
S82 | 极北柳莺 P. borealis * | FG | VPG | TI | 0a | 0.38 ± 0.12b | 0.40 ± 0.17ab | 0.051 | 0 | |
S83 | 双斑绿柳莺 P. plumbeitarsus | FG | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.13 ± 0.13 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.08 | 0 | |
S84 | 淡脚柳莺 P. tenellipes | FG | VPG | TI | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.13 ± 0.06 | 0.18 ± 0.10 | 0.078 | 0 | |
S85 | 红胁绣眼鸟 Zosterops erythropleurus | FG | VPG | TI | 0 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
S86 | 暗绿绣眼鸟 Z. japonicus * | FG | VPG | TI | 3.38 ± 0.86b | 5.85 ± 1.00a | 3.53 ± 0.75ab | 0.08 | 0 | |
S87 | 大山雀 Parus major * | FG | VPG | TI | 1.08 ± 0.30a | 0.58 ± 0.17a | 0b | 0 | 0 | |
S88 | 纯色啄花鸟 Dicaeum concolor | FG | VPG | N | 0 | 0.45 ± 0.31 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | |
S89 | 朱背啄花鸟 D. cruentatum | FG | VPG | N | 0.75 ± 0.17ab | 1.20 ± 0.36a | 0.48 ± 0.12b | 0.078 | 0.033 | |
S90 | 黄腹花蜜鸟 Cinnyris jugularis | FG | VPG | N | 1.73 ± 0.39 | 2.73 ± 0.44 | 2.65 ± 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.028 | |
S91 | 叉尾太阳鸟 Aethopyga christinae * | FG | VPG | N | 0.03 ± 0.03b | 0.65 ± 0.19a | 1.03 ± 0.24a | 0 | 0 | |
S92 | 白腰文鸟 Lonchura striata * | NF | OHU | G | 7.00 ± 1.54a | 0b | 0b | 0 | 0 | |
S93 | 斑文鸟 L. punctulata * | NF | OHU | G | 2.30 ± 0.89a | 0b | 0b | 0 | 0 |
1 | Báldi A (1996) Edge effects in tropical versus temperate forest bird communities: three alternative hypotheses for the explanation of differences.Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae, 42, 163-172. |
2 | Banks-Leite C, Ewers RM, Metzger JP (2010) Edge effects as the principal cause of area effects on birds in fragmented secondary forest.Oikos, 119, 918-926. |
3 | Barbaro L, Brocherhoff EG, Giffard B, Halder IV (2012) Edge and area effects on avian assemblages and insectivory in fragmented native forests.Landscape Ecology, 27, 1451-1463. |
4 | Barlow J, Peres CA (2004) Avifaunal responses to single and recurrent wildfires in Amazonian forests.Ecological Applications, 14, 1358-1373. |
5 | Barlow J, Mestre LA, Gardner TA, Peres CA (2007) The value of primary, secondary and plantation forests for Amazonian birds.Biological Conservation, 136, 212-231. |
6 | Bibby CJ, Burgress ND, Hill DA, Mustoe S (2000) Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London. |
7 | BirdLife International (2000) Threatened Birds of the World. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. |
8 | BirdLife International (2013) Endemic Bird Area Factsheet: Hainan.. (accessed 2013-03-08 |
9 | Blake JG, Loiselle BA (1991) Variation in resource abundance affects capture rates of birds in three lowland habitats in Costa Rica.The Auk, 108, 114-130. |
10 | Brittingham MC, Temple SA (1983) Have cowbirds caused forest songbirds to decline? BioScience, 33, 31-35. |
11 | Canaday C (1996) Loss of insectivorous birds along a gradient of human impact in Amazonia.Biological Conservation, 77, 63-77. |
12 | Castelletta M, Thiollay JM, Sodhi NS (2005) The effects of extreme forest fragmentation on the bird community of Singapore Island.Biological Conservation, 121, 135-155. |
13 | Chasko GG, Gates JE (1982) Avian habitat suitability along a transmission-line corridor in an oak-hickory forest region.Wildlife Monographs, 82, 3-41. |
14 | Dale S, Mork K, Solvang R, Plumptre AJ (2000) Edge effects on the understory bird community in a logged forest in Uganda.Conservation Biology, 14, 265-276. |
15 | Deng FY (邓福英), Zang RG (臧润国) (2007) The identifica- tion of functional groups in a secondary tropical montane rain forest of Hainan Island, south China.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 27, 3240-3249. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
16 | Deng WH (邓文洪), Gao W (高玮) (2005) Comparison of bird species richness and individual abundance among different forest edges.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 25, 2804-2810. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
17 | Deng WH, Gao W (2005) Edge effects on nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in fragmented forests.Biological Conservation, 126, 363-370. |
18 | Donovan TM, Jones PW, Annand EM, Thompson III FR (1997) Variation in local-scale edge effects: mechanisms and landscape context.Ecology, 78, 2064-2075. |
19 | Fimbel RA, Grajal A, Robinson JG (2001) The Cutting Edge: Conserving Wildlife in Logged Tropical Forest. Columbia University Press, New York. |
20 | Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Goldewijk KK (2003) Habitat conversion and global avian biodiversity loss. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, 1293-1300. |
21 | Gates JE, Gysel LW (1978) Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotones.Ecology, 59, 871-883. |
22 | Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2006) EcoSim: Null Models Software for Ecology(Version 7). Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. Jericho, VT 05465. Available at:. (accessed 2013-03-01) |
23 | Hanski IK, Fenske TJ, Niemi GJ (1996) Lack of edge effect in nesting success of breeding birds in managed forest landscapes.The Auk, 113, 578-585. |
24 | Hansson L (1983) Bird numbers across edges between mature conifer forest and clearcuts in Central Sweden.Ornis Scandinavica, 14, 97-103. |
25 | Huang BR (黄宝荣), Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Zhang HZ (张慧智), Zhang LH (张利华), Zheng H (郑华) (2009) Assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability of Hainan Island, China.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 20, 639-646. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
26 | James FC, Wamer NO (1982) Relationships between temperate forest bird communities and vegetation structure.Ecology, 63, 159-171. |
27 | Johnston VR (1947) Breeding birds of the forest edge in Illinois.The Condor, 49, 45-53. |
28 | Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Vasconcelos HL, Bruna EM, Didham RK, Stouffer PC, Gascon C, Bierregaard RO, Laurance SG, Sampaio E (2002) Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation.Conservation Biology, 16, 605-618. |
29 | Leopold A (1933) Game Management. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. |
30 | Levey DJ (1988) Spatial and temporal variation in Costa Rican fruit and fruit-eating bird abundance.Ecological Monographs, 58, 251-269. |
31 | Lian ZM (廉振民), Yu GZ (于广志) (2000) Edge effect and biodiversity.Chinese Biodiversity(生物多样性), 8, 120-125. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
32 | Lindell CA, Riffell SK, Kaiser SA, Battin AL, Smith ML, Sisk TD (2007) Edge responses of tropical and temperate birds.The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 119, 205-220. |
33 | Lovejoy TE, Bierregaard Jr RO, Rylands AB, Quintela CE, Harper LH, Brown Jr KS, Powell AH, Powell GV, Schubart HOR, Hays MB (1986) Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. In: Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversty (ed. Soulé ME), pp. 257-285. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. |
34 | Maina GG, Jackson WM (2003) Effects of fragmentation on artificial nest predation in a tropical forest in Kenya.Biological Conservation, 111, 161-169. |
35 | McCune B, Grace JB, Urban DL (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design Gleneden Beach, Oregon. |
36 | Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation.Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 58-62. |
37 | Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.Nature, 403, 853-858. |
38 | Paton PW (1994) The effect of edge on avian nest success: how strong is the evidence? Conservation Biology, 8, 17-26. |
39 | Reese KP, Ratti JT (1988) Edge effect: a concept under scrutiny.Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 53, 127-136. |
40 | Restrepo C, Gómez N (1998) Responses of understory birds to anthropogenic edges in a Neotropical montane forest.Ecological Applications, 8, 170-183. |
41 | Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review.Conservation Biology, 5, 18-32. |
42 | Sekercioglu CH (2002) Effects of forestry practices on vegetation structure and bird community of Kibale National Park, Uganda.Biological Conservation, 107, 229-240. |
43 | Sisk TD, Haddad NM, Ehrlich PR (1997) Bird assemblages in patchy woodlands: modeling the effects of edge and matrix habitats.Ecological Applications, 7, 1170-1180. |
44 | Sisk TD, Battin J (2002) Habitat edges and avian ecology: geographic patterns and insights for western landscapes.Studies in Avian Biology, 25, 30-48. |
45 | Soberón MJ, Llorente BJ (1993) The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness.Conservation Biology, 7, 480-488. |
46 | Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Prawiradilaga DM, Tinulele I, Putra DD, Tan THT (2005) Land use and conservation value for forest birds in Central Sulawesi (Indonesia).Biological Conservation, 122, 547-558. |
47 | Stephens SE, Koons DN, Rotella JJ, Willey DW (2004) Effects of habitat fragmentation on avian nesting success: a review of the evidence at multiple spatial scales.Biological Conservation, 115, 101-110. |
48 | Stiles FG (1985) Seasonal patterns and coevolution in the hummingbird-flower community of a Costa Rican subtropical forest.Ornithological Monographs, 36, 757-787. |
49 | Stiles FG, Skutch AF, Gardner D (1989) A Guide to the Birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. |
50 | Stratford JA, Robinson WD (2005) Gulliver travels to the fragmented tropics: geographic variation in mechanisms of avian extinction.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 85-92. |
51 | Terborgh J, Robinson SK, Parker III TA, Munn CA, Pierpont N (1990) Structure and organization of an Amazonian forest bird community.Ecological Monographs, 60, 213-238. |
52 | Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York. |
53 | Thiollay JM (1994) Structure, density and rarity in an Amazonian rainforest bird community.Journal of Tropical Ecology, 10, 449-481. |
54 | Varasteh-Moradi H, Zakaria M, Mohd AB, Yusof E (2010) Insectivorous birds and environmental factors across an edge-interior gradient in tropical rainforest of Malaysia.International Journal of Zoological Research, 6, 131-145. |
55 | Wang BS (王伯荪), Peng SL (彭少麟), Guo L (郭泺), Ye YH (叶有华) (2007) Diversity of tropical forest landscape-type in Hainan Island, China.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 27, 1690-1695. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
56 | Wang LB (王丽冰), Yan HM (颜亨梅), Lu XL (卢学理), Yuan XC (袁喜才), Tao FW (陶福文), Zhao RD (赵仁东) (2010) Habitat selection of the released Hainan eld’s deer in Houmiling Nature Reserve.Sichuan Journal of Zoology(四川动物), 29, 929-932. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
57 | Wang RS (王如松), Ma SJ (马世俊) (1985) Edge effect and its application in economic ecology.Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 2, 38-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
58 | Wardell-Johnson G, Williams M (2000) Edges and gaps in mature karri forest, south-western Australia: logging effects on bird species abundance and diversity.Forest Ecology and Management, 131, 1-21. |
59 | Watson JE, Whittaker RJ, Dawson TP (2004) Habitat structure and proximity to forest edge affect the abundance and distribution of forest-dependent birds in tropical coastal forests of southeastern Madagascar.Biological Conservation, 120, 311-327. |
60 | Woinarski J (1990) Effects of fire on the bird communities of tropical woodlands and open forests in northern Australia.Australian Journal of Ecology, 15, 1-22. |
61 | Wu HS (吴华盛) (2000) The protection and development of the natural forest of Hainan.Tropical Forest(热带林业), 28, 40-44. (in Chinese) |
62 | Wu ZY (吴征镒) (1980) Vegetation of China (中国植被). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
63 | Xiao Y (肖燚), Chen SB (陈圣宾), Zhang L (张路), Yue P (岳平), Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Liu XC (刘贤词) (2011) Designing nature reserve systems based on ecosystem services in Hainan Island.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 31, 7357-7369. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
64 | Zanette L, Doyle P, Tremont SM (2000) Food shortage in small fragments: evidence from an area-sensitive passerine.Ecology, 81, 1654-1666. |
65 | Zhang MX, Fellowes JR, Jiang XL, Wang W, Chan BPL, Ren GP, Zhu JG (2010) Degradation of tropical forest in Hainan, China, 1991-2008: conservation implications for Hainan gibbon (Nomascus hainanus).Biological Conservation, 143, 1397-1404. |
66 | Zhang Q, Han RC, Zou FS (2011) Effects of artificial afforestation and successional stage on a lowland forest bird community in southern China.Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 1738-1749. |
67 | Zheng GM (郑光美) (2011) A Checklist on the Classification and Distribution of the Birds of China, 2nd edn. (中国鸟类分类与分布名录, 第二版). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
68 | Zhou F (周放) (1987) Guild structure of the forest bird community in Dinghushan.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 7, 176-184. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
69 | Zou FS (邹发生), Chen GZ (陈桂珠) (2003) Application of mist net in studies of forest bird community.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 14, 1557-1560. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
70 | Zou FS (邹发生), Chen GZ (陈桂珠) (2004) A study of understory bird communities in tropical mountain rain forest of Jianfengling, Hainan Island, China.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 24, 510-516. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
71 | Zou FS, Chen GZ, Yang QF, Fellowes JR (2011) Composition of mixed-species flocks and shifts in foraging location of flocking species on Hainan Island, China.Ibis, 153, 269-278. |
72 | Zou FS, Chen GZ, Yang QF, Li YD (2012) Bird species richness along an elevational gradient in a forest at Jianfengling, Hainan Island, China.Zoological Studies, 51, 362-371. |
[1] | 李斌, 宋鹏飞, 顾海峰, 徐波, 刘道鑫, 江峰, 梁程博, 张萌, 高红梅, 蔡振媛, 张同作. 昆仑山青海片区鸟类群落多样性格局及其驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23406-. |
[2] | 李发扬, 李滢钰, 蒋文妮, 刘曙光, 霍超, 孙巧奇, 邹红菲. 火后恢复时间影响大兴安岭寒温带森林内部与边缘鸟类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22665-. |
[3] | 段曼微, 李香, 周阳, 赵敏欣, 孙秀玲, 韩冰, 张刚, 权子豪, 李凯. 基于蛾类多样性研究人工林斑块的边缘效应[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 23074-. |
[4] | 杨润明, 中村彰宏. 巢居蚂蚁更倾向于在人造光源附近定居繁殖[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(8): 22067-. |
[5] | 汪婷, 周立志. 合肥市小微湿地鸟类多样性的时空格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 21445-. |
[6] | 王定一, 倪祥银, 岳楷, 张潇月, 康自佳, 朱玲, 吴福忠. 白蚁活动对中亚热带次生林和人工林的危害差异[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(3): 21324-. |
[7] | 张田田, 王璇, 任海保, 余建平, 金毅, 钱海源, 宋小友, 马克平, 于明坚. 浙江古田山次生与老龄常绿阔叶林群落特征的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(10): 1069-1080. |
[8] | 吴初平, 韩文娟, 江波, 刘博文, 袁位高, 沈爱华, 黄玉洁, 朱锦茹. 浙江定海次生林内物种丰富度与生物量和生产力关系的环境依赖性[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(6): 545-553. |
[9] | 蔡军奇, 刘大鹏, 张淑媛, 宗国, 刘佳, 白雪娇. 辽东山区次生林乔木幼苗组成及其年际动态[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(11): 1147-1157. |
[10] | 王德艺, 郝建锋, 李艳, 齐锦秋, 裴曾莉, 黄雨佳, 蒋倩, 陈亚. 川西周公山柳杉人工林群落的边缘效应[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(8): 940-947. |
[11] | 袁春明, 耿云芬, 柴勇, 郝佳波, 吴涛. 哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林木质藤本对边缘效应的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(1): 40-47. |
[12] | 农友, 郑路, 贾宏炎, 卢立华, 黄德卫, 黄柏华, 雷丽群. 广西大青山次生林的群落特征及主要乔木种群的空间分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(3): 321-331. |
[13] | 徐远杰, 林敦梅, 米湘成, 任海保, 马克平. 古田山不同干扰程度森林的群落恢复动态[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(3): 358-365. |
[14] | 蒋科毅, 吴明, 邵学新, 吕咏. 杭州湾及钱塘江河口南岸滨海湿地鸟类群落多样性及其对滩涂围垦的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2013, 21(2): 214-223. |
[15] | 孙吉吉, 王思宇, 王彦平, 邵德钰, 丁平. 千岛湖栖息地片段化效应对鸟类巢捕食风险的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(5): 528-534. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn