生物多样性 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 358-365.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13202
所属专题: 生物多样性与生态系统功能
徐远杰1,2,,A;*(), 林敦梅2, 米湘成2, 任海保2, 马克平2
收稿日期:
2013-09-17
接受日期:
2014-02-22
出版日期:
2014-05-20
发布日期:
2014-06-04
通讯作者:
徐远杰
基金资助:
Yuanjie Xu1,2(), Dunmei Lin2, Xiangcheng Mi2, Haibao Ren2, Keping Ma2
Received:
2013-09-17
Accepted:
2014-02-22
Online:
2014-05-20
Published:
2014-06-04
摘要:
森林采伐后次生林的恢复过程对于生物多样性的保护和生态系统功能的重建具有重要意义。作者以古田山不同干扰程度的12个1 ha 森林样地为研究对象, 运用群落多元统计方法, 探讨了自然恢复过程中森林群落组成及物种多样性的动态变化及趋势。结果表明: 不同恢复阶段森林样地的群落组成存在显著性差异, 而同一恢复阶段的样地具有高度的相似性。物种丰富度随恢复进程有增加的趋势, 但各阶段差异并不显著; 物种均匀度除人工林较低以外, 其他恢复阶段之间无显著性差异。不同恢复阶段研究样地的群落组成及物种多样性的差异主要存在于林冠层。灌木及更新层具有各自的指示种, 人工林的指示种为落叶灌木或阳性乔木, 幼龄次生林的指示种为常绿灌木或小乔木, 老次生林的指示种为亚乔木层常绿树种, 老龄林的指示种为林冠层树种。上述结果表明古田山不同人为干扰程度森林群落的物种多样性具有较强的自我恢复能力。尽管物种组成难以预测, 但处于同一恢复阶段的森林, 其幼树的生活型组成呈现出一致的变化趋势。
徐远杰, 林敦梅, 米湘成, 任海保, 马克平 (2014) 古田山不同干扰程度森林的群落恢复动态. 生物多样性, 22, 358-365. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13202.
Yuanjie Xu,Dunmei Lin,Xiangcheng Mi,Haibao Ren,Keping Ma (2014) Recovery dynamics of secondary forests with different disturbance intensity in the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science, 22, 358-365. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13202.
图1 古田山不同恢复阶段森林样地聚类分析图。人工林样地包括01, 07, 11; 幼龄次生林样地包括03, 08, 09; 老次生林样地包括05, 06, 12; 老龄林样地包括02, 04, 10。
Fig. 1 Hierarchical clustering of 12 forest plots during four recovery phases in the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. Chinese fir forest plots include 01, 07, 11; Young secondary forest plots include 03, 08, 09; Old secondary forest plots include 05, 06, 12; Old-growth forest plots include 02, 04, 10.
物种名 Species name | 人工林 Chinese fir forests (CFF) | 幼龄次生林 Young secondary forests (YSF) | 老次生林 Old secondary forests (OSF) | 老龄林 Old-growth forests (OGF) |
---|---|---|---|---|
杉木 Cunninghamia lanceolata | 71.27 (25.85) | |||
檵木 Loropetalum chinensis | 3.06 (4.69) | 2.70 (2.89) | 6.17 (4.74) | |
隔药柃 Eurya muricata | 3.02 (4.68) | 2.78 (3.04) | 2.80 (3.77) | |
马尾松 Pinus massoniana | 1.71 (3.79) | 7.37 (4.92) | 14.33 (7.55) | |
石栎 Lithocarpus glaber | 1.90 (3.54) | 5.32 (3.89) | 7.98 (5.36) | |
山合欢 Albizia kalkora | 0.81 (2.82) | |||
黄瑞木 Adinandra millettii | 0.77 (2.34) | |||
柳叶蜡梅 Chimonanthus salicifolius | 3.05 (2.08) | |||
黄檀 Dalbergia hupeana | 0.64 (1.98) | |||
拟赤杨 Alniphyllum fortunei | 0.59 (1.95) | |||
甜槠 Castanopsis eyrei | 23.76 (9.03) | 5.89 (4.31) | 15.69 (8.73) | |
米槠 C. carlesii | 9.04 (5.27) | 8.32 (3.43) | ||
木荷 Schima superba | 4.56 (3.51) | 11.30 (6.61) | 10.95 (6.25) | |
马银花 Rhododendron ovatum | 3.11 (3.26) | 5.44 (4.86) | ||
麂角杜鹃 R. latoucheae | 2.95 (3.18) | 5.36 (5.26) | ||
短尾越橘 Vaccinium carlesii | 3.30 (3.04) | |||
青冈 Cyclobalanopsis glauca | 2.52 (2.80) | 5.39 (4.02) | 5.12 (2.53) | |
栲 Castanopsis fargesii | 2.18 (2.94 | |||
杨梅 Myrica rubra | 2.04 (2.82) | |||
浙江红山茶 Camellia chekiangoleosa | 2.43 (2.94) | |||
浙江新木姜子 Neolitsea aurata var. chekiangensis | 1.47 (2.81) | |||
红楠 Machilus thunbergii | 2.74 (2.46) | |||
窄基红褐柃 Eurya rubiginosa var. attenuata | 2.38 (2.49) |
表1 古田山不同恢复阶段森林样地优势种重要值的平均值(%)及其对组内相似性的贡献率(%)
Table 1 Average importance values (%) of dominant species and their contributions (%) to within-group similarity
物种名 Species name | 人工林 Chinese fir forests (CFF) | 幼龄次生林 Young secondary forests (YSF) | 老次生林 Old secondary forests (OSF) | 老龄林 Old-growth forests (OGF) |
---|---|---|---|---|
杉木 Cunninghamia lanceolata | 71.27 (25.85) | |||
檵木 Loropetalum chinensis | 3.06 (4.69) | 2.70 (2.89) | 6.17 (4.74) | |
隔药柃 Eurya muricata | 3.02 (4.68) | 2.78 (3.04) | 2.80 (3.77) | |
马尾松 Pinus massoniana | 1.71 (3.79) | 7.37 (4.92) | 14.33 (7.55) | |
石栎 Lithocarpus glaber | 1.90 (3.54) | 5.32 (3.89) | 7.98 (5.36) | |
山合欢 Albizia kalkora | 0.81 (2.82) | |||
黄瑞木 Adinandra millettii | 0.77 (2.34) | |||
柳叶蜡梅 Chimonanthus salicifolius | 3.05 (2.08) | |||
黄檀 Dalbergia hupeana | 0.64 (1.98) | |||
拟赤杨 Alniphyllum fortunei | 0.59 (1.95) | |||
甜槠 Castanopsis eyrei | 23.76 (9.03) | 5.89 (4.31) | 15.69 (8.73) | |
米槠 C. carlesii | 9.04 (5.27) | 8.32 (3.43) | ||
木荷 Schima superba | 4.56 (3.51) | 11.30 (6.61) | 10.95 (6.25) | |
马银花 Rhododendron ovatum | 3.11 (3.26) | 5.44 (4.86) | ||
麂角杜鹃 R. latoucheae | 2.95 (3.18) | 5.36 (5.26) | ||
短尾越橘 Vaccinium carlesii | 3.30 (3.04) | |||
青冈 Cyclobalanopsis glauca | 2.52 (2.80) | 5.39 (4.02) | 5.12 (2.53) | |
栲 Castanopsis fargesii | 2.18 (2.94 | |||
杨梅 Myrica rubra | 2.04 (2.82) | |||
浙江红山茶 Camellia chekiangoleosa | 2.43 (2.94) | |||
浙江新木姜子 Neolitsea aurata var. chekiangensis | 1.47 (2.81) | |||
红楠 Machilus thunbergii | 2.74 (2.46) | |||
窄基红褐柃 Eurya rubiginosa var. attenuata | 2.38 (2.49) |
图2 古田山不同恢复阶段森林样地主林层、亚乔木层、灌木及更新层无度量多维标定图。C: 林冠层; S: 亚乔木层; R: 灌木及更新层。不同林层后面的数字为样方号。OGF, OSF, YSF, CFF同表1。
Fig. 2 Non-metric multidimensional scale (NMS) ordination of canopy, sub-canopy, and shrub and regeneration layers of 12 forest plots during four recovery phases in the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. C, S, R represent canopy layer, sub-canopy layer, shrub and regeneration layer, respectively. Numbers are plot codes. CFF, OGF, OSF, YSF, see Table 1.
图3 古田山不同恢复阶段森林样地物种多样性指数。CFF, OGF, OSF, YSF同表1。
Fig. 3 Species diversity indices of 12 forest plots during four recovery phases in the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. CFF, OGF, OSF, YSF, see Table 1.
图4 古田山不同恢复阶段森林样地林冠层、亚乔木层、灌木及更新层k-优势度图。CFF, OGF, OSF, YSF同表1。
Fig. 4 K-dominance plot of canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs and regeneration layers of 12 forest plots during four recovery phases in the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. CFF, OGF, OSF, YSF, see Table 1.
树种 Tree species | 组别 Group | 指示值 Value | P值 P<0.05 |
---|---|---|---|
山合欢 Albizia kalkora | CFF | 84.3 | 0.0188 |
拟赤杨 Alniphyllum fortunei | CFF | 59.7 | 0.0346 |
楤木 Aralia chinensis | CFF | 80.4 | 0.0188 |
紫珠 Callicarpa bodinieri | CFF | 69.0 | 0.0412 |
大青 Clerodendrum cyrtophyllum | CFF | 62.3 | 0.0346 |
杉木 Cunninghamia lanceolata | CFF | 98.6 | 0.0188 |
黄檀 Dalbergia hupeana | CFF | 79.7 | 0.0188 |
小果冬青 Ilex micrococca | CFF | 93.5 | 0.0188 |
山胡椒 Lindera glauca | CFF | 85.0 | 0.0188 |
山鸡椒 Litsea cubeba | CFF | 89.2 | 0.0188 |
马尾松 Pinus massoniana | CFF | 66.2 | 0.0188 |
化香 Platycarya strobilacea | CFF | 86.3 | 0.0354 |
豆腐柴 Premna microphylla | CFF | 68.4 | 0.0168 |
水马桑 Weigela japonica var. sinica | CFF | 86.2 | 0.0188 |
栀子 Gardenia jasminoides | CSF | 45.0 | 0.0486 |
野漆 Toxicodendron succedaneum | YSF | 74.6 | 0.0496 |
短尾越桔 Vaccinium carlesii | YSF | 48.8 | 0.0456 |
厚叶冬青 Ilex elmerriliana | YSF | 67.9 | 0.0128 |
宁波木犀 Osmanthus cooperi | YSF | 74.7 | 0.0160 |
石斑木 Rhaphiolepis indica | YSF | 65.7 | 0.0160 |
赤楠 Syzygium buxifolium | YSF | 75.7 | 0.0088 |
冬青 Ilex chinensis | OSF | 67.1 | 0.0190 |
浙闽樱 Prunus schneideriana | OSF | 51.4 | 0.0130 |
檵木 Loropetalum chinensis | OSF | 49.9 | 0.0166 |
乳源木莲 Manglietia yuyuanensis | OSF | 91.6 | 0.0376 |
刨花楠 Machilus pauhoi | OSF | 100.0 | 0.0190 |
浙江红山茶 Camellia chekiangoleosa | OGF | 94.0 | 0.0146 |
窄基红褐柃 Eurya rubiginosa var. attenuata | OGF | 64.6 | 0.0332 |
麂角杜鹃 Rhododendron latoucheae | OGF | 55.1 | 0.0162 |
秀丽槭 Acer elegantulum | OGF | 100.0 | 0.0162 |
钩栲 Castanopsis tibetana | OGF | 96.9 | 0.0446 |
浙江樟 Cinnamomum japonicum | OGF | 97.8 | 0.0162 |
灰白蜡瓣花 Corylopsis glandulifera | OGF | 99.3 | 0.0162 |
小叶青冈 Cyclobalanopsis gracilis | OGF | 97.5 | 0.0162 |
细叶青冈 C. myrsinaefolia | OGF | 100.0 | 0.0162 |
尾叶冬青 Ilex wilsonii | OGF | 96.5 | 0.0066 |
马醉木 Pieris japonica | OGF | 74.7 | 0.0334 |
表2 古田山不同恢复阶段森林样地灌木及更新层指示种
Table 2 Indicator species of shrubs and regeneration layer of 12 forest plots during four recovery phases in the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve
树种 Tree species | 组别 Group | 指示值 Value | P值 P<0.05 |
---|---|---|---|
山合欢 Albizia kalkora | CFF | 84.3 | 0.0188 |
拟赤杨 Alniphyllum fortunei | CFF | 59.7 | 0.0346 |
楤木 Aralia chinensis | CFF | 80.4 | 0.0188 |
紫珠 Callicarpa bodinieri | CFF | 69.0 | 0.0412 |
大青 Clerodendrum cyrtophyllum | CFF | 62.3 | 0.0346 |
杉木 Cunninghamia lanceolata | CFF | 98.6 | 0.0188 |
黄檀 Dalbergia hupeana | CFF | 79.7 | 0.0188 |
小果冬青 Ilex micrococca | CFF | 93.5 | 0.0188 |
山胡椒 Lindera glauca | CFF | 85.0 | 0.0188 |
山鸡椒 Litsea cubeba | CFF | 89.2 | 0.0188 |
马尾松 Pinus massoniana | CFF | 66.2 | 0.0188 |
化香 Platycarya strobilacea | CFF | 86.3 | 0.0354 |
豆腐柴 Premna microphylla | CFF | 68.4 | 0.0168 |
水马桑 Weigela japonica var. sinica | CFF | 86.2 | 0.0188 |
栀子 Gardenia jasminoides | CSF | 45.0 | 0.0486 |
野漆 Toxicodendron succedaneum | YSF | 74.6 | 0.0496 |
短尾越桔 Vaccinium carlesii | YSF | 48.8 | 0.0456 |
厚叶冬青 Ilex elmerriliana | YSF | 67.9 | 0.0128 |
宁波木犀 Osmanthus cooperi | YSF | 74.7 | 0.0160 |
石斑木 Rhaphiolepis indica | YSF | 65.7 | 0.0160 |
赤楠 Syzygium buxifolium | YSF | 75.7 | 0.0088 |
冬青 Ilex chinensis | OSF | 67.1 | 0.0190 |
浙闽樱 Prunus schneideriana | OSF | 51.4 | 0.0130 |
檵木 Loropetalum chinensis | OSF | 49.9 | 0.0166 |
乳源木莲 Manglietia yuyuanensis | OSF | 91.6 | 0.0376 |
刨花楠 Machilus pauhoi | OSF | 100.0 | 0.0190 |
浙江红山茶 Camellia chekiangoleosa | OGF | 94.0 | 0.0146 |
窄基红褐柃 Eurya rubiginosa var. attenuata | OGF | 64.6 | 0.0332 |
麂角杜鹃 Rhododendron latoucheae | OGF | 55.1 | 0.0162 |
秀丽槭 Acer elegantulum | OGF | 100.0 | 0.0162 |
钩栲 Castanopsis tibetana | OGF | 96.9 | 0.0446 |
浙江樟 Cinnamomum japonicum | OGF | 97.8 | 0.0162 |
灰白蜡瓣花 Corylopsis glandulifera | OGF | 99.3 | 0.0162 |
小叶青冈 Cyclobalanopsis gracilis | OGF | 97.5 | 0.0162 |
细叶青冈 C. myrsinaefolia | OGF | 100.0 | 0.0162 |
尾叶冬青 Ilex wilsonii | OGF | 96.5 | 0.0066 |
马醉木 Pieris japonica | OGF | 74.7 | 0.0334 |
附图1 古田山不同恢复阶段森林样地(100 m × 100 m)地形图。图中数字为相对高程; 人工林样地包括01, 07, 11; 幼龄次生林样地包括03, 08, 09; 老次生林样地包括05, 06, 12; 老龄林样地包括02, 04, 10。
Fig. S1 Topographical maps of 12 forest plots during four recovery phases in the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. The figures in the map refer to relative elevations of forest plots; Chinese fir forest plots include 01, 07, 11; Young secondary forest plots include 03, 08, 09; Old secondary forest plots include 05, 06, 12; Old-growth forest plots include 02, 04, 10. http://www.biodiversity-science.net/fileup/PDF/w2013-202-1.pdf
[1] | Baker PJ, Bunyavejchewin S, Oliver CD, Ashton PS (2005) Disturbance history and historical stand dynamics of a seasonal tropical forest in western Thailand.Ecological Monographs, 75, 317-343. |
[2] | Bengtsson J, Nilsson SG, Franc A, Menozzi P (2000) Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests.Forest Ecology and Management, 132, 39-50. |
[3] | Bruelheide H, Böhnke M, Both S, Fang T, Assmann T, Baruffol M, Bauhus J, Buscot F, Chen XY, Ding BY, Durka W, Erfmeier A, Fischer M, Geißler C, Guo DL, Guo LD, Härdtle W, He JS, Hector A, Kröber W, Kühn P, Lang A, Nadrowski K, Pei KQ, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Shi XZ, Scholten T, Schuldt A, Trogisch S, von Oheimb G, Welk E, Wirth C, Wu YT, Yang XF, Zeng XQ, Zhang SR, Zhou HZ, Ma KP, Schmid B (2011) Community assembly during secondary forest succession in a Chinese subtropical forest.Ecological Monographs, 81, 25-41. |
[4] | Cannon C, Peart DR, Leighton M, Kartawinata K (1994) The structure of lowland rainforest after selective logging in West Kalimantan, Indonesia.Forest Ecology and Management, 67, 49-68. |
[5] | Capers RS, Chazdon RL, Brenes AR, Alvarado BV (2005) Successional dynamics of woody seedling communities in wet tropical secondary forests.Journal of Ecology, 93, 1071-1084. |
[6] | Carignan V, Villard MA (2001) Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: a review.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 78, 45-61. |
[7] | Chazdon RL (2003) Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances.Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 6, 51-71. |
[8] | Chazdon RL, Letcher SG, Van Breugel M, Martínez-Ramos M, Bongers F, Bryan F (2007) Rates of change in tree communities of secondary Neotropical forests following major disturbances.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 273-289. |
[9] | Dent DH, DeWalt SJ, Denslow JS (2012) Secondary forests of central Panama increase in similarity to old-growth forest over time in shade tolerance but not species composition.Journal of Vegetation Science, 24, 530-542. |
[10] | DeWalt SJ, Maliakal SK, Denslow JS (2003) Changes in vegetation structure and composition along a tropical forest chronosequence: implications for wildlife.Forest Ecology and Management, 182, 139-151. |
[11] | Diekmann M (2003) Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology—a review.Basic and Applied Ecology, 4, 493-506. |
[12] | Ding SY (丁圣彦), Song YC (宋永昌) (1998) Declining causes of Pinus massoniana in the processes of succession of evergreen broad-leaved forest.Acta Botanica Sinica(植物学报), 40, 755-760. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Dupuy JM, Chazdon RL (2008) Interacting effects of canopy gap, understory vegetation and leaf litter on tree seedling recruitment and composition in tropical secondary forests.Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 3716-3725. |
[14] | Finegan B (1996) Pattern and process in neotropical secondary rain forests: the first 100 years of succession.Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 119-124. |
[15] | Fornwalt PJ, Kaufmann MR, Huckaby LS, Stohlgrenvon TJ (2009) Effects of past logging and grazing on understory plant communities in a montane Colorado forest.Plant Ecology, 203, 99-109. |
[16] | Guariguata MR, Ostertag R (2001) Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics.Forest Ecology and Management, 148, 185-206. |
[17] | Hu ZH (胡正华), Yu MJ (于明坚), Ding BY (丁炳扬), Fang T (方腾), Qian HY (钱海源), Chen QC (陈启瑺) (2003) Types of evergreen broad-leaved forests and their species diversity in Gutian Mountain National Nature Reserve.Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology(应用与环境生物学报), 9, 341-345. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Kassi NK, Decocq G (2008) Successional patterns of plant species and community diversity in a semi-deciduous tropical forest under shifting cultivation.Journal of Vegetation Science, 19, 809-820. |
[19] | Klanderud K, Mbolatiana HZH, Vololomboahangy MN, Radimbison MA, Roger E, Totland Ø, Rajeriarison C (2010) Recovery of plant species richness and composition after slash-and-burn agriculture in a tropical rainforest in Madagascar.Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 187-204. |
[20] | Kubota Y, Katsuda K, Kikuzawa K (2005) Secondary succession and effects of clear-logging on diversity in the subtropical forests on Okinawa Island, southern Japan.Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 879-901. |
[21] | McDonald RI, Motzkin G, Foster DR (2008) The effect of logging on vegetation composition in Western Massachusetts.Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 4021-4031. |
[22] | Mishra BP, Tripathi OP, Tripathi RS, Pandey HN (2004) Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on plant diversity and community structure of a sacred grove in Meghalaya, northeast India.Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 421-436. |
[23] | Norden N, Chazdon RL, Chao A, Jiang YH, Vilchez-Alvarado B (2009) Resilience of tropical rain forests: tree community reassembly in secondary forests.Ecology Letters, 12, 385-394. |
[24] | Peña-Claros M (2003) Changes in forest structure and species composition during secondary forest succession in the Bolivian Amazon.Biotropica, 35, 450-461. |
[25] | Sagar R, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (2003) Tree species composition, dispersion and diversity along a disturbance gradient in a dry tropical forest region of India.Forest Ecology and Management, 186, 61-71. |
[26] | Saldarriaga JG, West DC, Tharp ML, Uhl C (1988) Long-term chronosequence of forest succession in the Upper Rio Negro of Colombia and Venezuela.Journal of Ecology, 76, 938-958. |
[27] | Smith RGB, Nichols JD, Vanclay JK (2005) Dynamics of tree diversity in undisturbed and logged subtropical rainforest in Australia.Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 2447-2463. |
[28] | Verburg R, van Eijk-Bos C (2003) Effects of selective logging on tree diversity, composition and plant functional type patterns in a Bornean rain forest.Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 99-110. |
[29] | Villela DM, Nascimento MT, Aragão LE, Gama DM (2006) Effect of selective logging on forest structure and nutrient cycling in a seasonally dry Brazilian Atlantic forest.Journal of Biogeography, 33, 506-516. |
[30] | von Oheimb G, Härdtle W (2009) Selection harvest in temperate deciduous forests: impact on herb layer richness and composition.Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 271-287. |
[31] | Wang XH, Kent M, Fang XF (2007) Evergreen broad-leaved forest in Eastern China: its ecology and conservation and the importance of resprouting in forest restoration.Forest Ecology and Management, 245, 76-87. |
[32] | Zhu Y (祝燕), Zhao GF (赵谷风), Zhang LW (张俪文), Shen GC (沈国春), Mi XC (米湘成), Ren HB (任海保), Yu MJ (于明坚), Chen JH (陈建华), Chen SW (陈声文), Fang T (方腾), Ma KP (马克平) (2008) Community composition and structure of a Gutianshan forest dynamics plot in a mid-subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest, East China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology(植物生态学报), 32, 262-273. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 王子彤, 张鹗. 赣江鱼类物种更新名录[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(9): 1256-1264. |
[2] | 张昭臣, 胡健波, 杨庆松, 练琚愉, 李步杭, 王希华, 叶万辉, 张健. 中国亚热带4个森林动态监测样地无人机可见光遥感影像数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(9): 1181-1185. |
[3] | 程洁婕, 李美君, 袁桃花, 黄红, 杨桂丽, 白新祥. 中国野生杜鹃花属植物名录与地理分布数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(9): 1175-1180. |
[4] | 杨苗, 张杰, 白嘉伟, 郭建刚, 曲亚辉, 李会平. 雾灵山国家级自然保护区大型真菌物种多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(9): 1229-1235. |
[5] | 易浪, 董亚坤, 苗白鸽, 彭艳琼. 云南高黎贡山地区蝴蝶群落多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 950-959. |
[6] | 贺佳云, 张东, 储玲, 严云志. 人为干扰对溪流鱼类功能多样性及其纵向梯度格局的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 927-937. |
[7] | 梁聪, 刘衎, 王小东, 黎树, 吴波, 向朋, 宋昭彬. 四川诺水河珍稀水生动物国家级自然保护区鱼类资源现状[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 938-949. |
[8] | 陈旭, 王国严, 彭培好, 李景吉, 石松林, 张廷斌. 四川攀西地区云南松群落物种多样性和谱系多样性对紫茎泽兰入侵的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 865-874. |
[9] | 周润, 慈秀芹, 肖建华, 曹关龙, 李捷. 气候变化对亚热带常绿阔叶林优势类群樟属植物的影响及保护评估[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 697-711. |
[10] | 姬云瑞, 陶义, 李昌林, 李迪强, 赵定, 刘芳. 利用红外相机调查四川雪宝顶国家级自然保护区鸟类和兽类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 805-810. |
[11] | 莫锦华, 姬云瑞, 许涵, 李迪强, 刘芳. 海南尖峰岭国家级自然保护区森林动态监测样地鸟类和兽类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 819-824. |
[12] | 师雪芹, 王健. 安徽省苔藓植物名录[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 798-804. |
[13] | 孙柔鑫, 王彦国, 林茂, 邢炳鹏, 陈小银, 项鹏, 王春光. 隆水蚤科多样性与生态学研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 855-864. |
[14] | 郭英荣, 兰文军, 邹思成, 袁荣斌, 董晓雨, 曹吉锐, 杨清培, 宋庆妮. 江西武夷山国家级自然保护区林下鸟类和兽类资源的红外相机监测[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 811-818. |
[15] | 李亦超, 陈永生, Denis Sandanov, 罗奥, 吕童, 苏香燕, 刘云鹏, 王庆刚, Viktor Chepinoga, Sergey Dudov, 王伟, 王志恒. 欧亚大陆东部毛茛科植物多样性格局及主导因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(5): 561-574. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn