雪灾对古田山常绿阔叶林群落结构的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.09220

生物多样性 ›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 197-205. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.09220

所属专题：中国的森林生物多样性监测

雪灾对古田山常绿阔叶林群落结构的影响

曼兴兴¹^,², 米湘成¹, 马克平¹^,^*()

1 (中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093)
2 (中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049)

收稿日期:2010-09-15 接受日期:2010-11-29 出版日期:2011-03-20 发布日期:2011-06-01
通讯作者: 马克平
作者简介:*E-mail: kpma@ibcas.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目“中国东部森林生物多样性格局与地理分异”(kzcx2-yw-430)

Effects of an ice storm on community structure of an evergreen broad- leaved forest in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve, Zhejiang Province

Xingxing Man¹^,², Xiangcheng Mi¹, Keping Ma¹^,^*()

1 State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093
2 Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received:2010-09-15 Accepted:2010-11-29 Online:2011-03-20 Published:2011-06-01
Contact: Keping Ma

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了解雪灾对亚热带常绿阔叶林群落结构的影响, 我们于2008年初对古田山24 ha固定监测样地进行了调查。经统计, 约1/3的树木遭受重度损伤, 1/3的树木遭受轻度损伤。选择生境类型、胸径、物种的物候型、生长型4个因子, 用多项逻辑斯蒂回归分析了这些因子对个体损伤的影响。结果表明: 低海拔山谷受损最严重, 树木倒伏、折断的倾向最大, 高海拔山脊受损最轻。胸径影响树木的受损程度和类型, 大致来说, 随着胸径的增大, 树木受损的比例增大, 折断、断梢相对于压弯的可能性逐渐增大, 断枝相对折断、断梢的可能性也逐渐增大。常绿物种较落叶物种受损更重。由于上层乔木的庇护, 灌木树种受损较为轻微。采用除趋势对应分析(DCA)比较了雪灾前后群落结构的变化, 结果表明: 在40 m × 40 m尺度上, 群落的变化与随机变化的零假设有显著差异, 这说明冰雪灾害对个体的损伤不是随机的, 而是有物种选择性的, 如甜槠(Castanopsis eyrei)、木荷(Schima superba)和马尾松(Pinus massoniana)等物种受灾情况显著低于随机损伤的零假设, 而青冈(Cyclobalanopsis glauca)、石栎(Lithocarpus glaber)、马银花(Rhododendron ovatum)等物种显著地高于随机损伤的零假设, 群落的物种组成在雪灾后发生了显著的变化。

关键词: 冰雪灾害, 受损类型, 多项逻辑斯蒂回归, DCA, 群落结构

Abstract

We inventoried tree damage within a 24-ha plot in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve immediately after the ice storm that affected south China in 2008. This ice storm caused severe damage to one third of trees and relatively slight damage to another third of trees in the plot. Results from our multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that all of the four examined factors, diameter at breast height (DBH), habitat type, plant life form and leaf habit (evergreen/deciduous), had close relationship with the damage types of forest trees. The results of multinomial logistic regression model indicated that evergreen canopy trees in low valleys with larger DBH suffered more severe damage. Detrended correspondence analysis was employed to compare variation in forest community composition before and after the ice storm. Variation in community composition before and after the ice storm differed significantly from stochastic variation modeled with null models at scales of 40 m×40 m. This result indicates that some species are more prone to ice-storm damage than others, which may result in directional changes in community composition.

Key words: ice storm, damage type, multinomial logistic regression, detrended correspondence analysis, community structure

曼兴兴, 米湘成, 马克平 (2011) 雪灾对古田山常绿阔叶林群落结构的影响. 生物多样性, 19, 197-205. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.09220.

Xingxing Man, Xiangcheng Mi, Keping Ma (2011) Effects of an ice storm on community structure of an evergreen broad- leaved forest in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve, Zhejiang Province. Biodiversity Science, 19, 197-205. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.09220.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.09220

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2011/V19/I2/197

图/表 10

参考文献 27

[1]	Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.
[2]	Boerner REJ, Runge SD, Cho DS, Kooser JG (1988) Localized ice storm damage in an Appalachian Plateau watershed. American Midland Naturalist, 119, 199-208.
[3]	Bruederle LP, Stearns FW (1985) Ice storm damage to a southern Wisconsin mesic forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 112, 167-175.
[4]	Chen B (陈彬), Mi XC (米湘成), Fang T (方腾), Chen L (陈磊), Ren HB (任海保), Ma KP (马克平) (2009) Gutianshan Forest Dynamic Plot: Tree Species and Their Distribution Patterns (浙江古田山森林: 树种及其分布格局). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[5]	Chen LZ (陈鹭真), Wang WQ (王文卿), Zhang YH (张宜辉), Huang L (黄丽), Zhao CL (赵春磊), Yang SC (杨盛昌), Yang ZW (杨志伟), Chen YC (陈粤超), Xu HL (徐华林), Zhong CR (钟才荣), Su B (苏博), Fang BZ (方柏州), Chen NM (陈乃明), Zeng CZ (曾传志), Lin GH (林光辉) (2010) Damage to mangroves from extreme cold in early 2008 in southern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 34, 186-194. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Cremer KW, Carter PR, Minko G (1983) Snow damage in Australian pine plantations. Australian Forestry, 46, 53-66.
[7]	He Q (何茜), Li JY (李吉跃), Chen XY (陈晓阳), Chen HY (陈红跃), Peng HG (彭华贵), Fan SJ (樊顺江) (2010) Types and extent of damage to Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations due to unusually heavy snow and ice in southern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 34, 195-203. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	Higuchi K, Shabbar A (2007) Meteorological conditions associated with ice storm damage to forests. In: Plant Disturbance Ecology: the Process and the Response (eds Johnson EA, Miyanishi K), pp. 157-180. Academic Press, New York.
[9]	Hopkin A, Williams T, Sajan R, Pedlar J, Nielsen C (2003) Ice storm damage to eastern Ontario forests: 1998-2001. Forestry Chronicle, 79, 47-53.
[10]	Hou XY (侯向阳), Han JX (韩进轩) (1996) Regeneration and restoration of Korean pine broadleaf mixed forest in windfall area in Changbai Mountain. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 32, 419-425. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical Ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
[12]	Legendre P, Mi XC, Ren HB, Ma KP, Yu MJ, Sun IF, He FL (2009) Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broad- leaved forest of China. Ecology, 90, 663-674. URL PMID
[13]	Li XF (李秀芬), Zhu JJ (朱教君), Wang QL (王庆礼), Liu ZG (刘足根) (2005) Forest damage induced by wind/snow: a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25, 148-157. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	Lou LH (楼炉焕), Jin SH (金水虎) (2000) Spermatophyta flora of Gutianshan Nature Reserve in Zhejiang. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 22(5), 33-39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	Ma ZQ (马泽清), Wang HM (王辉民), Wang SQ (王绍强), Li QK (李庆康), Wang YD (王义东), Wang HQ (汪宏清) (2010) Impact of a severe ice storm on subtropical plantations at Qianyanzhou, Jiangxi, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 34, 204-212. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	Pickett STA, Kolasa J, Armesto JJ, Collins SL (1989) The ecological concept of disturbance and its expression at various hierarchical levels. Oikos, 54, 129-136.
[17]	Proulx OJ, Greene DF (2001) The relationship between ice thickness and northern hardwood tree damage during ice storms. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31, 1758-1767.
[18]	R Development Core Team (2009) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org. accessed 2010-08
[19]	Smith KT, Shortle WC (2003) Radial growth of hardwoods following the 1998 ice storm in New Hampshire and Maine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33, 325-329.
[20]	Su ZY (苏志尧), Liu G (刘刚), Ou YD (区余端), Dai ZH (戴朝晖), Li ZK (李镇魁) (2010) Storm damage in a montane evergreen broadleaved forest of Chebaling National Nature Reserve, South China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 34, 213-222. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	Tang JM (汤景明), Song CW (宋丛文), Dai JH (戴均华), Liu HG (刘恒贵), Zheng XY (郑孝严) (2008) Investigation on the frozen snow damage of main afforestation tree species in Hubei Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 44(11), 2-10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	Takahashi K, Arii K, Lechowicz MJ (2007) Quantitative and qualitative effects of a severe ice storm on an old-growth beech-maple forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37, 598-606.
[23]	Wang LL (王立龙), Lu L (陆林) (2010) Analysis of the damage to Phyllostachys pubescens forests caused by a severe snow in Jiuhua Mountain, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 34, 233-239. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	Xu JM (徐建民), Li GY (李光友), Lu ZH (陆钊华), Xiang DY (项东云), Zeng BS (曾炳山), Zhang NN (张宁南), Guo HY (郭洪英) (2008) Investigation on Eucalypt forest plantations subjected to the freezing catastrophe in southern China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 44(7), 103-110. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	Zhang JG (张建国), Duan AG (段爱国), Tong SZ (童书振), Sun HG (孙洪刚), Deng ZF (邓宗富), Zhang SG (张守攻) (2008) Harm of frost and snow suppress to near mature stands of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 44(11), 18-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	Zhang XS (张祥松), Shi YF (施雅风) (1990) Researches on ice damages in China. Advances in Earth Science (地球科学进展), (3), 40-45. (in Chinese)
[27]	Zhu JJ, Li XF, Liu ZG, Cao W, Gonda Y, Matsuzaki T (2006) Factors affecting the snow and wind induced damage of a montane secondary forest in northeastern China. Silva Fennica, 40, 37-51.

等级 Damage class	受损类型 Damage type	类型描述 Description	个体数 Individuals	受损类型比例 Ratio of damage type (%)	受损等级比例(%) Ratio of damage class
正常 Undamaged	正常 Undamaged	树冠完整, 受损不明显 Complete crown or unaffected	6,948	33.58	33.58
轻度损伤 Slightly damaged	压弯 Bent	树干弯曲倾斜 Bole bent	599	2.90	32.19
	断枝少 Slight branch loss	少于50%的分枝折断 Less than half of the branches lost	3,400	16.43
	断枝多 Severe branch loss	多于50%的分枝折断 More than half of the branches lost	2,662	12.86
严重损伤 Severely damaged	断梢 Broken within crown	林冠中的树干折断 Broken within crown	1,478	7.14	34.23
	折断 Snapping	1.3 m以上林冠以下的树干折断 Broken above 1.3 m and below the crown	1,831	8.85
	倒伏 Uprooted	1.3 m以下处折断或倒伏 Uprooted or broken below 1.3 m	3,775	18.24

等级 Damage class	受损类型 Damage type	类型描述 Description	个体数 Individuals	受损类型比例 Ratio of damage type (%)	受损等级比例(%) Ratio of damage class
正常 Undamaged	正常 Undamaged	树冠完整, 受损不明显 Complete crown or unaffected	6,948	33.58	33.58
轻度损伤 Slightly damaged	压弯 Bent	树干弯曲倾斜 Bole bent	599	2.90	32.19
	断枝少 Slight branch loss	少于50%的分枝折断 Less than half of the branches lost	3,400	16.43
	断枝多 Severe branch loss	多于50%的分枝折断 More than half of the branches lost	2,662	12.86
严重损伤 Severely damaged	断梢 Broken within crown	林冠中的树干折断 Broken within crown	1,478	7.14	34.23
	折断 Snapping	1.3 m以上林冠以下的树干折断 Broken above 1.3 m and below the crown	1,831	8.85
	倒伏 Uprooted	1.3 m以下处折断或倒伏 Uprooted or broken below 1.3 m	3,775	18.24

模型 Model	自由度 df	赤池信息量准则 AIC
全模型 Full model	42	67307.86
-物候型 Leaf habit	36	67468.36
-生长型 Life form	36	67638.26
-生境类型 Habitat	24	68044.74
-胸径 DBH	36	69572.91

模型 Model	自由度 df	赤池信息量准则 AIC
全模型 Full model	42	67307.86
-物候型 Leaf habit	36	67468.36
-生长型 Life form	36	67638.26
-生境类型 Habitat	24	68044.74
-胸径 DBH	36	69572.91

	log(π_U/π_N)	log(π_S/π_N)	log(π_BR/π_N)	log(π_BL1/π_N)	log(π_BL2/π_N)	log(π_BE/π_N)
截距项 Intercept	0.23	-0.16(ns)	-1.00	-2.10	-1.55	0.37
胸径 DBH	0.00(ns)	-0.02	0.01	0.08	0.06	-0.16
生境类型(对照为低海拔山谷) Habitat type (low valley as base-line category)
低海拔山脊 Low ridge	-0.83	-0.81	-0.56	-0.52	-0.12	-0.65
高海拔山谷 High valley	-0.56	-0.58	-0.56	-0.31	-0.05(ns)	-1.30
高海拔山脊 High ridge	-1.74	-0.91	-0.50	-0.52	-0.46	-1.40
物候型(对照为常绿) Leaf habit (evergreen as base-line category)
落叶 Deciduous	-0.48	-0.55	-0.71	-0.63	-0.32	-0.88
生长型(对照为乔木) Life form (tree as base-line category)
灌木 Shrub	-0.53	-0.72	-1.16	-0.56	-0.44	-0.14(ns)

雪灾对古田山常绿阔叶林群落结构的影响

Effects of an ice storm on community structure of an evergreen broad- leaved forest in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve, Zhejiang Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

生境类型 Habitat type	总数 Total	倒伏 Uprooted	折断 Snapping	压弯 Bent		断枝多 Severe branch loss	断枝少 Slight branch loss	正常 Undamaged
低海拔山谷	7,821	24.50%	11.19%	3.98%	7.70%	13.41%	13.89%	25.34%
Low valley		(12.95)	(6.96)	(5.62)	(1.84)	(1.35)	(-5.56)	(-12.57)
低海拔山脊	9,566	15.35%	7.09%	2.45%	6.68%	12.89%	19.03%	36.53%
Low ridge		(-6.63)	(-5.79)	(-2.58)	(-1.69)	(0.07)	(6.26)	(4.98)
高海拔山谷	1,277	18.64%	8.46%	1.33%	6.03%	13.23%	17.78%	34.53%
High valley		(0.33)	(-0.47)	(-3.28)	(-1.49)	(0.37)	(1.19)	(0.59)
高海拔山脊	2,029	7.54%	8.38%	1.82%	7.89%	10.40%	13.16%	50.81%
High ridge		(-11.29)	(-0.71)	(-2.84)	(1.25)	(-3.10)	(-3.64)	(13.40)

径级 Diameter class (cm)	总数 Total	倒伏 Uprooted	折断 Snapping	压弯 Bent	断梢 Broken within crown	断枝多 Severe branch loss	断枝少 Slight branch loss	正常 Undamaged
8-10	4,071	19.90%	10.17%	7.59%	4.77%	3.02%	6.71%	47.85%
		(2.47)	(2.83)	(17.61)	(-5.68)	(-17.51)	(-15.31)	(15.72)
10-15	5,768	19.61%	11.22%	3.59%	6.83%	5.95%	10.94%	41.87%
		(2.43)	(6.05)	(3.10)	(-0.89)	(-14.65)	(-10.29)	(10.87)
15-20	3,590	19.42%	9.14%	1.59%	8.77%	11.11%	19.05%	30.92%
		(1.64)	(0.58)	(-4.60)	(3.66)	(-2.92)	(3.88)	(-2.75)
20-30	4,339	18.85%	7.58%	0.55%	9.75%	19.54%	23.72%	20.00%
		(0.94)	(-2.80)	(-9.07)	(6.42)	(12.27)	(11.84)	(15.43)
30-45	2,449	11.51%	4.08%	0.08%	5.39%	31.97%	27.36%	19.60%
		(-7.80)	(-7.93)	(-8.18)	(-3.25)	(26.36)	(13.34)	(-11.94)
45-88	476	7.77%	2.73%	0.00%	4.20%	34.87%	23.74%	26.68%
		(-5.35)	(-4.49)	(-3.71)	(-2.40)	(13.39)	(3.93)	(-2.60)

	DCA1	DCA2	DCA3	DCA4
雪灾前 Before ice-storm	0.352	0.113	0.087	0.067
雪灾后 After ice-storm	0.366	0.129	0.105	0.070

物种 Species	P-value	多度 Abundance	死亡数目 Number of death	死亡率 Death rate (%)
甜槠 Castanopsis eyrei	0.0001	5,065	1,172	23.14
马尾松 Pinus massoniana	0.0001	1,128	116	10.28
短柄枹栎 Quercus serrata var. brevipetiolata	0.0001	2,031	254	12.51
木荷 Schima superba	0.0001	2,885	686	23.78
厚皮香 Ternstroemia gymnanthera	0.0207	623	146	23.43
杨梅蚊母树 Distylium myricoides	0.0379	720	174	24.17
野漆 Toxicodendron succedaneum	0.0676	133	28	21.05
杨梅 Myrica rubra	0.2225	396	100	25.25
山合欢 Albizia kalkora	0.3688	183	47	25.68
红淡比 Cleyera japonica	0.4007	68	17	25.00
乌饭树 Vaccinium bracteatum	0.6900	62	18	29.03
格药柃 Eurya muricata	0.7197	214	61	28.50
栲树 C. fargesii	0.8723	201	61	30.35
香桂 Cinnamomum subavenium	0.8983	53	18	33.96
浙江柿 Diospyros glaucifolia	0.9124	98	32	32.65
钩栲 C. tibetana	0.9158	68	23	33.82
黄檀 Dalbergia hupeana	0.9274	126	41	32.54
杜英 Elaeocarpus decipiens	0.9567	152	50	32.89
赤楠 Syzygium buxifolium	0.9606	131	44	33.59
红枝柴 Meliosma oldhamii	0.9764	166	56	33.73
石灰花楸 Sorbus folgneri	0.9801	66	25	37.88
光萼林檎 Malus leiocalyca	0.9838	90	33	36.67
日本杜英 E. japonicus	0.9866	61	24	39.34
赤杨叶 Alniphyllum fortunei	0.9872	97	36	37.11
细叶青冈 Cyclobalanopsis myrsinaefolia	0.9900	215	73	33.95
杨桐 Adinandra millettii	0.9977	200	72	36.00
宁波木犀 Osmanthus cooperi	0.9980	51	23	45.10
红楠 Machilus thunbergii	0.9996	421	144	34.20
苦枥木 Fraxinus insularis	0.9998	175	69	39.43
紫果槭 Acer cordatum	0.9999	61	28	45.90
青冈 C. glauca	1.0000	771	349	45.27
虎皮楠 Daphniphyllum oldhamii	1.0000	818	323	39.49
石栎 Lithocarpus glaber	1.0000	447	240	53.69
檵木 Loropetalum chinense	1.0000	864	347	40.16
浙江新木姜子 Neolitsea aurata var. chekiangensis	1.0000	151	79	52.32
麂角杜鹃 Rhododendron latoucheae	1.0000	379	147	38.79
马银花 R. ovatum	1.0000	534	189	35.39

[1]	倪艳梅, 陈莉, 董志远, 孙德斌, 李宝泉, 王绪敏, 陈琳琳. 黄河三角洲湿地生态修复区大型底栖动物群落结构与生态健康评价[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23303-.
[2]	魏嘉欣, 姜治国, 杨林森, 熊欢欢, 金胶胶, 罗方林, 李杰华, 吴浩, 徐耀粘, 乔秀娟, 魏新增, 姚辉, 余辉亮, 杨敬元, 江明喜. 湖北神农架中亚热带山地落叶阔叶林25 ha动态监测样地群落物种组成与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23338-.
[3]	刘啸林, 吴友贵, 张敏华, 陈小荣, 朱志成, 陈定云, 董舒, 李步杭, 丁炳扬, 刘宇. 浙江百山祖25 ha亚热带森林动态监测样地群落组成与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23294-.
[4]	杨舒涵, 王贺, 陈磊, 廖蓥飞, 严光, 伍一宁, 邹红菲. 松嫩平原异质生境对土壤线虫群落特征的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23295-.
[5]	张多鹏, 刘洋, 李正飞, 葛奕豪, 张君倩, 谢志才. 长江上游支流赤水河流域底栖动物物种多样性与保护对策[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 22674-.
[6]	刘彩莲, 许庆, 王林龙, 邢衍阔, 宋稼豪, 林柏岸, 康斌, 刘敏. 闽东近海春秋季游泳动物多样性、密度及群落特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22635-.
[7]	朱晓华, 高程, 王聪, 赵鹏. 尿素对土壤细菌与真菌多样性影响的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22636-.
[8]	毛莹儿, 周秀梅, 王楠, 李秀秀, 尤育克, 白尚斌. 毛竹扩张对杉木林土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22659-.
[9]	陈哲涵, 尹进, 叶吉, 刘冬伟, 毛子昆, 房帅, 蔺菲, 王绪高. 增温对东北温带次生林草本群落季节动态的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 23059-.
[10]	张鹤露, 赵美红, 孙世春, 刘晓收. 西藏那曲市高原盐湖自由生活线虫群落多样性与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22533-.
[11]	魏庐潞, 徐婷婷, 李媛媛, 艾喆, 马飞. 同质园环境和遗传分化影响锦鸡儿属植物根际土壤固氮菌多样性和群落结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22477-.
[12]	林魏巍, 田呈明, 熊典广, 刘伟航, 热依汗古丽·斯地克, 梁英梅. 新疆杨树人工林中蜘蛛群落多样性及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22493-.
[13]	赵雯, 王丹丹, 热依拉·木民, 黄开钏, 刘顺, 崔宝凯. 阿尔山地区兴安落叶松林土壤微生物群落结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22258-.
[14]	张伟, 翟东东, 熊飞, 刘红艳, 陈元元, 王莹, 廖传松, 段辛斌, 田辉伍, 邓华堂, 陈大庆. 三峡库区鱼类群落结构和功能多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22136-.
[15]	杨润明, 中村彰宏. 巢居蚂蚁更倾向于在人造光源附近定居繁殖[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(8): 22067-.