生物多样性

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

国外旗舰物种范式研究进展与启示——基于LDA模型综述

刘荆州1#,钱易鑫2#,张燕雪丹1*,崔凤1*   

  1. 1.上海海洋大学海洋生物资源与管理学院,上海,201306;2. 上海海洋大学经济管理学院,上海,201306;

  • 收稿日期:2023-11-20 修回日期:2024-03-13 出版日期:2024-04-07 发布日期:2024-04-07
  • 通讯作者: 张燕雪丹

Review of Studies on Flagship Species Paradigms in English Literature Based on the Application of the LDA Model and Suggestion

Jingzhou Liu1#, Yixin Qian2#, Yanxuedan Zhang1*, Feng Cui1*   

  1. 1 College of Marine Living Resource Sciences and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306

    2 College of Economics Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306

  • Received:2023-11-20 Revised:2024-03-13 Online:2024-04-07 Published:2024-04-07
  • Contact: Yanxuedan Zhang

摘要: 旗舰物种范式是借助代表性物种的公共影响力实现生物多样性保护目的的一种策略。旗舰物种项目一般可分为市场型、公益型和混合型三类。尽管这一策略在国际上已成为提升公众环保意识和筹措保护资金的重要手段,但国内学界关注度不够,限制了其发展。因此,有必要对国际研究进行梳理,启发国内采取相关策略。本文利用潜在迪利克雷分布(Latent Dirichlet Allocation, LDA)的主题模型,选取英文学术期刊上发表的旗舰物种范式相关文献,将文献聚合为旗舰物种范式的理论研究、旗舰物种项目的案例研究、问卷访谈揭示的公众态度及其影响因素、旗舰物种范式的场景落地问题、旗舰物种范式的负面效应、旗舰物种范式的优化策略等6个主题并进行综述。本文发现:(1)旗舰物种范式存在动物福利问题、天花板效应、诺亚方舟问题与未经本土化的保护主义4个负面效应,(2)对应上述问题存在本土化、降干扰、去偏见与跨界传播4个发展方向;(3)旗舰物种范式存在围绕旗舰物种定义与本质属性的冲突。本文进一步讨论了旗舰物种的定义、旗舰物种的遴选、关于旗舰物种局限性的争论3个重大问题,给出了明确范式的实现形式、多主体协同参与、优化旗舰物种遴选与项目安排、加强本土创新与国际合作等建议。

关键词: 生物多样性保护, 旗舰物种范式, LDA模型, 研究综述

Abstract

Background: The flagship species paradigm is a strategy aimed at biodiversity conservation by harnessing public influence through representative species. It encompasses three types of programs: profitable, non-profitable, and hybrid. While this approach has proven instrumental in raising public awareness and funds for conservation, it has not yet received significant academic attention in China. This lack of focus has hindered its theoretical and practical development. To address this, we propose a comprehensive review of relevant studies and offer suggestions to stimulate further research in China.

Method: This paper selected English literature relevant to the flagship species paradigm published in academic journals from 2013 to 2023 using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation thematic model with the following steps: (1) searched articles from the Web of Science with keywords such as flagship species and charismatic species; (2) adopted coherence score and perplexity scores indicators after applying unsupervised learning in Python. (3) identified the major themes and labelled core words; (4) manually read articles under each theme with current research progress summarized.

Results: This paper identified six themes, i.e., studies on the theories of the flagship species paradigm, case studies on the flagship species program, public attitudes and influencing factors identified by employing questionnaires and interviews, the realization of the paradigm in the local context, the negative impacts of adopting flagship species paradigm, and the optimization of the approach. Based on reviewing these six themes, it finds that: (1) conflicts do exist on the definition and the determination of the flagship species; (2) the adoption of flagship species programs may encounter four problems, i.e. negative impacts on animal welfare, “ceiling effect”, “Noah’s Ark” problem, and protectionism due to failure to engage local context; (3) localization, reduction of interruption, elimination of bias, and cross-border dissemination are the four research directions identified to address the identified problems.

Suggestion: This article provides suggestions based on further discussion of three key issues, i.e., the definition of the flagship species, the selection criteria of the flagship species, and the restriction of the flagship species paradigm. More research should be conducted on the realization of the paradigm, coordination and participation of various stakeholders, optimization of selection criteria of flagship species and planning, and improved localization and international cooperation.

Key words: Biodiversity conservation, Flagship species paradigm, LDA model, literature review