兴隆山国家级自然保护区不同生境的蝴蝶群落结构与种-多度分布

doi:10.17520/biods.2019386

生物多样性 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (8): 983-992. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019386

所属专题：昆虫多样性与生态功能

兴隆山国家级自然保护区不同生境的蝴蝶群落结构与种-多度分布

尚素琴¹^,^*(), 吴兴波¹, 王召龙¹, 彭鹤年¹, 周惠丽², 张红勇², 白映禄¹

^1. 甘肃农业大学植物保护学院/甘肃省农作物病虫害生物防治工程实验室, 兰州 730070
^2. 甘肃兴隆山国家级自然保护区管理局, 甘肃榆中 730117

收稿日期:2019-12-06 接受日期:2020-06-16 出版日期:2020-08-20 发布日期:2020-09-01
通讯作者: 尚素琴
作者简介:*. E-mail: shangsq@gsau.edu.cn
基金资助:
生态环境部生物多样性保护重大工程(SDZXWJZ012016034)

Butterfly community structure and species-abundance distribution in different habitats in the Xinglong Mountains National Nature Reserve

Suqin Shang¹^,^*(), Xingbo Wu¹, Zhaolong Wang¹, Henian Peng¹, Huili Zhou², Hongyong Zhang², Yinglu Bai¹

1 Biological Engineering Laboratory of Crop Diseases and Pests of Gansu Province, College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070
2 Administration of Xinglong Mountains National Nature Reserve in Gansu Province, Yuzhong, Gansu 730117

Received:2019-12-06 Accepted:2020-06-16 Online:2020-08-20 Published:2020-09-01
Contact: Suqin Shang

1. 附录1 兴隆山国家级自然保护区各样线蝴蝶的种类及数量.pdf(180KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为明确甘肃兴隆山国家级自然保护区内的蝴蝶种类, 以及不同生境的蝴蝶群落结构与种-多度分布的变化情况, 在全部5个林场选取6条样线, 于2015-2018年连续4年采用样线法对保护区的蝴蝶进行调查和采集, 并分析了其多样性指数及种-多度分布。4年共采集蝴蝶标本5,719号, 经鉴定隶属8科69属120种。眼蝶科(3,093号)是保护区的优势类群, 喙蝶科仅采集到1号标本(朴喙蝶, Libythea lepita), 为保护区的稀有种类。其中, 各样线的种数、个体数、多样性指数以及物种丰富度表现为: 样线I最高, 样线IV次之, 说明其生境结构稳定, 环境良好, 适合蝶类生存; 样线III蜜源植物丰富, 各项指数较高; 样线V海拔较高, 各项指数较低; 样线II植物群落结构单一, 各项指数最低。相似性系数分析结果表明: 样线I和VI、III和IV、III和VI均为中等相似; 其余各样线间为中等不相似。区系分析结果表明: 古北种有63种, 占总种数的52.5%; 东洋种2种, 占总种数的1.7%; 广布种55种, 占总种数的45.8%。说明古北种占绝对优势, 且明显高于东洋种, 具有很强的地区代表性。种-多度分布分析结果表明: 样线I和IV呈现出对数正态分布, 模型拟合效果较好; 样线II和VI为非典型的对数级数模型, 符合生态位优先占领假说。说明不同生境以及人为干扰因素与蝶类多样性关系密切, 表现出单一生态系统蝴蝶群落的多样性指数较低, 复杂生态系统其多样性指数较高的特点。

关键词: 蝴蝶, 群落结构, 生物多样性指数, 种-多度分布, 兴隆山国家级自然保护区

Abstract

In order to determine species abundance, abundance distribution, and changes in community structure of butterflies found in different habitats in Xinglong Mountains National Nature Reserve, there are six sampling transect lines in total were used in various habitats in the forest stations located within the reserve. Between 2015-2018, the butterfly community in the reserve was evaluated using the method of route tracking. A total of 5,719 butterfly specimens belonging to 120 species, 69 genera, and 8 families were collected and these data were used to determine the biodiversity index and species-abundance distribution. The results show that the family Satyridae was the dominant group while species of family Libytheidae were the rarest. Using species numbers, individual numbers, diversity index and species richness as primary metrics, the sampling transect lines performed as follows: line I ranked first, and line IV ranked second, indicating that these habitats have stable structure and ideal environments well-suited for butterfly survival; line III ranked next and had a high diversity index due an abundance of nectar plants, followed by line V which had a lower diversity index due to its location at a higher altitude; finally, line II was ranked lowest due to the simple plant community structure present. The similarity coefficient between line I and VI, III and IV, III and VI were moderately similar, while pairwise comparisons between all other line combinations were moderately dissimilar. The fauna analysis showed that there were 63 Palaearctic species, 2 Oriental species, and 55 widely distributed species, which accounted for 52.5%, 1.7%, and 45.8% of the total species, respectively. The Palaearctic species were dominant relative to the Oriental species, which had a strong regional representation. The results of the species-abundance distribution analysis found that line I and IV had lognormal distribution pattern with a good model fit and line II and VI were atypical logarithmic series model, which was in accordance with the niche-preemption hypothesis. Together, these results indicate that both different habitats and human disturbance correlate with butterfly diversity, seen most notably in the diversity indices which were lower in simple ecosystems and higher in complicated ecosystems.

Key words: butterfly, community structure, diversity index, species-abundance distribution, Xinglong Mountains National Nature Reserve

尚素琴, 吴兴波, 王召龙, 彭鹤年, 周惠丽, 张红勇, 白映禄 (2020) 兴隆山国家级自然保护区不同生境的蝴蝶群落结构与种-多度分布. 生物多样性, 28, 983-992. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019386.

Suqin Shang, Xingbo Wu, Zhaolong Wang, Henian Peng, Huili Zhou, Hongyong Zhang, Yinglu Bai (2020) Butterfly community structure and species-abundance distribution in different habitats in the Xinglong Mountains National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science, 28, 983-992. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019386.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2019386

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2020/V28/I8/983

图/表 8

参考文献 41

[1]	Berger WH, Parker FL (1970) Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science, 168, 1345-1347. DOI URL PMID
[2]	Cai JZ (2011) Monograph of Butterfies in Xiaolongshan, Gansu Province. Gansu Science and Technology Press, Lanzhou. (in Chinese)
	[ 蔡继增 (2011) 甘肃省小陇山蝶类志甘肃科学技术出版社, 兰州.]
[3]	Cao TW, Wang R, Dong JM, Xuan SB, Zhao F, Li J, Zhao JS (2004) The diversity and zonal distribution of butterflies in Shanxi Province. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 47, 793-802. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 曹天文, 王瑞, 董晋明, 宣善滨, 赵飞, 李捷, 赵俊生 (2004) 山西省蝶类多样性与地带分布. 昆虫学报, 47, 793-802.]
[4]	Caprio E, Ellena I, Rolando A (2009) Assessing habitat /landscape predictors of bird diversity in managed deciduous forests: A seasonal and guild-based approach. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 1287-1303.
[5]	Chen JJ, Wang YF, Lei GC, Wang RJ, Xu RM (2004) Impact of habitat quality on metapopulation structure and distribution of two melitaeine butterfly species. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 47, 59-66. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 陈洁君, 王义飞, 雷光春, 王戎疆, 徐汝梅 (2004) 栖息地质量对两种网蛱蝶集合种群结构和分布的影响. 昆虫学报, 47, 59-66]
[6]	Chou I (1994) Monographia Rhopalocerorum Sinensium. Henan Science and Technology Publishing House, Zhengzhou. (in Chinese)
	[ 周尧 (1994) 中国蝶类志河南科学技术出版社, 郑州.]
[7]	Chou I (1998) Classification and Identification of Chinese Butterflies. Henan Science and Technology Publishing House, Zhengzhou. (in Chinese)
	[ 周尧 (1998) 中国蝴蝶分类与鉴定河南科学技术出版社, 郑州.]
[8]	Devries PJ (1987) The Butterflies of Costa Rica and Their Natural History: Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
[9]	Gu W, Ma L, Liu ZQ, Jiao Y, Wang LD, Zhang C, Sun H, Sun MO (2015) Diversity of butterflies in Liangshui Nature Reserves of Xiao Xing’an Mountains. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35, 7387-7396. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 顾伟, 马玲, 刘哲强, 焦玥, 王利东, 张琛, 孙虎, 孙美欧 (2015) 小兴安岭凉水自然保护区蝶类多样性. 生态学报, 35, 7387-7396.]
[10]	He DH, Tian C, Ren GD, Hao FM, Ma SY (1988) Preliminary study on community structure and succession of desert steppe insects. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 10(6), 26-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 贺达汉, 田畴, 任国栋, 郝峰茂, 马世渝 (1988) 荒漠草原昆虫的群落结构及其演替规律初探. 中国草地学报, 106, 26-30.]
[11]	Kitahara M, Sei K (2001) A comparison of the diversity and structure of butterfly communities in semi-natural and human-modified grassland habitats at the foot of Mt. Fuji, central Japan. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 331-351.
[12]	Li CH, Huang C, Yu WY, Wang XP, Chen JX, Xu SJ (2007) Study on the diversity and fauna of butterflies in Yuntai Low Mountain, Jiangsu Province. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 31(3), 122-124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 李朝晖, 黄成, 虞蔚岩, 王小平, 陈建秀, 徐善金 (2007) 江苏省云台山地蝶类多样性与区系研究. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 313, 122-124.]
[13]	Li JJ, Wang YK (2005) Regularity of horizontal distribution and fauna of forest insects in Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 33(6), 96-99. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 李进军, 汪有奎 (2005) 祁连山自然保护区森林昆虫区系及水平分布规律. 东北林业大学学报, 336, 96-99.]
[14]	Lin FM, Deng HL, Yuan XZ, Liu H, Wu YY (2012) On the butterfly diversity of different habitat types in the Three Gorge Reservoir. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 29(5), 26-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 林芳淼, 邓合黎, 袁兴中, 刘红, 吴玉源 (2012) 三峡库区不同生境类型蝶类多样性调查及分析. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 295, 26-30.]
[15]	Liu LW, Pan CC, Liu JL, He L (2015) Resources and fauna of butterflies in Jiulongshan Mountain National Nature Reserve. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 34, 3438-3442. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 刘立伟, 潘成椿, 刘菊莲, 何亮 (2015) 九龙山国家级自然保护区蝶类资源与区系. 生态学杂志, 34, 3438-3442.]
[16]	Liu WP, Deng HL (1997) The butterfly diversities in Muli, Sichuan Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 17, 266-271. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 刘文萍, 邓合黎 (1997) 木里蝶类多样性的研究. 生态学报, 17, 266-271.]
[17]	Lu T, Ma KM, Ni HW, Fu BJ, Zhang JY, Lu Q (2008) Variation in species composition and diversity of wetland communities under different disturbance intensity in the Sanjiang Plain. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28, 1893-1900. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 卢涛, 马克明, 倪红伟, 傅伯杰, 张洁瑜, 陆琦 (2008) 三江平原不同强度干扰下湿地植物群落的物种组成和多样性变化. 生态学报, 28, 1893-1900.]
[18]	Ma FZ, Xu HG, Chen MM, Tong WJ, Wang CB, Cai L (2018) Progress in construction of China Butterfly Diversity Observation Network (China BON-Butterflies). Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 34, 27-36. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 马方舟, 徐海根, 陈萌萌, 童文君, 王晨彬, 蔡蕾 (2018) 全国蝴蝶多样性观测网络(China BON-Butterflies)建设进展. 生态与农村环境学报, 34, 27-36.]
[19]	Maes D, Van Dyck H (2001) Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (North Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biological Conservation, 99, 263-276.
[20]	Magurran AE (1988) Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. II. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
[21]	McGeoch MA (1998) The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biological Reviews, 73, 181-202.
[22]	Pianka ER (1966) Convexity, desert lizards, and spatial heterogeneity. Ecology, 47, 1055-1059.
[23]	Pielou EC (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, 131-144.
[24]	Pryke SR, Samways MJ (2003) Quality of remnant indigenous grassland linkages for adult butterflies (Lepidoptera) in an afforested African landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 1985-2004.
[25]	Qi B, Yang P, Deng HL (2006) The diversity indexes, richness and evenness of butterfly communities in the Three Gorge Reservoir Area of Yangtze River. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26, 3049-3059. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 漆波, 杨萍, 邓合黎 (2006) 长江三峡库区蝶类群落的物种多样性. 生态学报, 26, 3049-3059.]
[26]	Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conservation Biology, 5, 18-32.
[27]	Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423, 623-656.
[28]	Steffan-Dewenter, Tscharntke T (2000) Butterfly community structure in fragmented habitats. Ecology Letters, 3, 449-456.
[29]	Sun RQ (2003) Development of ecological tourism in nature reserves. Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology, ( 3), 42-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 孙瑞谦 (2003) 浅谈自然保护区生态旅游开发. 陕西林业科技, ( 3), 42-46.]
[30]	Thomas CD (1991) Habitat use and geographic ranges of butterflies from the wet lowlands of Costa Rica. Biological Conservation, 55, 269-281.
[31]	Tian FB, Zhou HL, Shang SQ (2017) Description of species and analyzed on fauna of butterfly subfamily Coliadinae from Gansu Province. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 152(5), 83-91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 田赋斌, 周惠丽, 尚素琴 (2017) 甘肃省黄粉蝶亚科昆虫记述及地理区系分析. 甘肃农业大学学报, 152(5), 83-91.]
[32]	Wan FH, Chen CM (1986) Studies on the structure of the rice pest-natural enemy community and diversity under IPM area and chemical control area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 6, 73-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 万方浩, 陈常铭 (1986) 综防区和化防区稻田害虫-天敌群落组成及多样性的研究. 生态学报, 6, 73-84.]
[33]	Wang YP, Wu H, Xu HC (2008) Butterfly diversity and evaluation of forest ecosystem health in important ecological areas of Zhejiang Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28, 5259-5269. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王义平, 吴鸿, 徐华潮 (2008) 浙江重点生态地区蝶类生物多样性及其森林生态系统健康评价. 生态学报, 28, 5259-5269.]
[34]	Xie SG, Li SH, Shi FM (2004) Composition and diversity of butterflies fauna in Jiuzhaigou Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 26, 584-588. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 谢嗣光, 李树恒, 石福明 (2004) 四川省九寨沟自然保护区蝶类区系组成及多样性. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 26, 584-588.]
[35]	Yang L, Qi DM, Wang J, Tang W, Feng X, Yuan L (2015) Winter bird diversity and habitat characteristics in north campus of Xichang College. Chinese Journal of Wildlife, 36, 197-201. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 杨岚, 亓东明, 王静, 唐伟, 冯茜, 袁丽 (2015) 西昌学院北校区校园冬季鸟类多样性及栖息地特征. 野生动物学报, 36, 197-201.]
[36]	Zhang SY, Guo XG, Gong ZD, Zhang LY, Wu D, Wang ZK (2008) Investigation on community ecology and species abundance distribution of fleas on small mammals in 21 counties of Yunnan, China. Chinese Journal of Zoonoses, 24, 518-521. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张胜勇, 郭宪国, 龚正达, 张丽云, 吴滇, 王政昆 (2008) 云南省21县市小兽体表蚤类群落生态及种多度分布. 中国人兽共患病学报, 24, 518-521.]
[37]	Zhang YH, Wang ZX, Wang XP, Jia YX (2014) Species diversity and fauna characteristics of butterfly in 3 major forest areas of Ningxia Province. Western Forestry Science, 43(5), 76-80. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张云会, 王章训, 王新谱, 贾彦霞 (2014) 宁夏3大林区蝶类多样性及其区系特征. 西部林业科学, 435, 76-80.]
[38]	Zhang YL (2000) Butterfly resources in Xinglongshan Natural Reserve of Gansu (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology, 25(1), 37-38. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张远林 (2000) 甘肃兴隆山自然保护区的蝴蝶资源(一) (鳞翅目: 弄蝶科). 甘肃林业科技, 251, 37-38.]
[39]	Zhang YL (2002) Butterfly resources in Xinglongshan Natural Reserve of Gansu (Lepidoptera: Lycaenoidea). Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology, 27(4), 17-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张远林 (2002) 甘肃兴隆山自然保护区的蝴蝶资源(二) (鳞翅目: 凤蝶总科、灰蝶总科). 甘肃林业科技, 274, 17-21.]
[40]	Zhang YL, Shi ZM (2004) Butterfly resources in Xinglongshan Natural Reserve of Gansu (Lepidoptera: Nymphaloidea). Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology, 29(3), 18-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张远林, 施泽梅 (2004) 甘肃兴隆山自然保护区的蝴蝶资源(三) (鳞翅目: 蛱蝶总科). 甘肃林业科技, 293, 18-21.]
[41]	Zhou HL, Shang SQ, Ru Y, Zhang HY (2016) Study on butterfly family Pieridae in Xionglong Mountains National Reserve in Gansu Province. Grassland and Turf, 36(6), 45-48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 周惠丽, 尚素琴, 汝阳, 张红勇 (2016) 甘肃兴隆山国家级自然保护区粉蝶多样性研究. 草原与草坪, 366, 45-48.]

样线 Line	位置及主要植被类型 Site and type of vegetation	海拔 Altitude	人为干扰 Human disturbance
I	位于麻家寺管理站附近, 属灌木、阔叶林和农田生境。植物有花椒、沙棘、榛子、锦鸡儿、胡麻、紫花苜蓿、百合、杨树、桦树。 Located near the Majiasi Station, mainly including shrubs, broad-leaved forest and farmland habitats, and containing Zanthoxylum bungeanum, Hippophae rhamnoides, Corylus avellana, Caragana arborescens, Medicago sativa, Lilium brownii var. viridulum, Populus alba, and Betula utilis.	2,195-2,251 m	适中 Moderate
II	位于官滩沟管理站向西1 km处, 植被主要是针阔混交林和灌丛。植物有油松、落叶松、青海云杉、灌丛、杂草。 Located 1 km west to Guantangou Station, mainly including shrubs, coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, and containing Pinus tabuliformis, Larix gmelinii, Picea crassifolia, shrubs and grasses.	2,295-2,491 m	弱 Weak
III	位于兴隆山景区, 植被主要是灌木和针叶混交林。植物有油松、青海云杉、侧柏、圆柏、刺柏、小檗、沙棘、锦鸡儿。 Located in Xinglong Mountain Scenic Area, mainly including shrubs and coniferous mixed forest, and containing Pinus tabuliformis, Picea crassifolia, Platycladus orientalis, Sabina chinensis, Juniperus formosana, Berberis thunbergii, Hippophae rhamnoides, and Caragana arborescens.	2,203-2,322 m	适中 Moderate
IV	位于官滩沟管理站向东大约2 km处, 植被主要是农田和灌丛。植物有百合、玫瑰、油菜、荨麻、藜、野草莓、车前子、党参、大黄、益母草、蒲公英、红柳、沙棘。 Located about 2 km east to Guantangou Station, mainly including shrubs and farmerland, and containing Lilium brownii var. viridulum, Rosa rugosa, Brassica napus, Urtica fissa, Chenopodium album, Fragaria vesca, Plantago asiatica, Codonopsis pilosula, Rheum palmatum, Leonurus japonicus, Taraxacum mongolicum, Tamarix ramosissima, and Hippophae rhamnoides.	2,109-2,368 m	弱 Weak
V	位于上庄管理站, 植被主要是高山草甸和针叶林。植物有油松、落叶松及各种杂草。 Located in Shangzhuang Station, mainly including alpine meadow and coniferous forest, and containing Pinus tabuliformis, Larix gmelinii and all kinds of grasses.	2,595-2,848 m	弱 Weak
VI	位于马坡管理站向北约1 km处, 植被主要是针叶林和灌木。植物有油松、落叶松、桦树、小檗、黄芪、当归、党参。 Located about 1 km north to Mapo Station, mainly including coniferous forest and shrubs, and containing Pinus tabuliformis, Larix gmelinii, Betula sp., Berberis thunbergii, Astragalus propinquus, Angelica sinensis, and Codonopsis pilosula.	2,171-2,354 m	适中 Moderate

样线 Line	位置及主要植被类型 Site and type of vegetation	海拔 Altitude	人为干扰 Human disturbance
I	位于麻家寺管理站附近, 属灌木、阔叶林和农田生境。植物有花椒、沙棘、榛子、锦鸡儿、胡麻、紫花苜蓿、百合、杨树、桦树。 Located near the Majiasi Station, mainly including shrubs, broad-leaved forest and farmland habitats, and containing Zanthoxylum bungeanum, Hippophae rhamnoides, Corylus avellana, Caragana arborescens, Medicago sativa, Lilium brownii var. viridulum, Populus alba, and Betula utilis.	2,195-2,251 m	适中 Moderate
II	位于官滩沟管理站向西1 km处, 植被主要是针阔混交林和灌丛。植物有油松、落叶松、青海云杉、灌丛、杂草。 Located 1 km west to Guantangou Station, mainly including shrubs, coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, and containing Pinus tabuliformis, Larix gmelinii, Picea crassifolia, shrubs and grasses.	2,295-2,491 m	弱 Weak
III	位于兴隆山景区, 植被主要是灌木和针叶混交林。植物有油松、青海云杉、侧柏、圆柏、刺柏、小檗、沙棘、锦鸡儿。 Located in Xinglong Mountain Scenic Area, mainly including shrubs and coniferous mixed forest, and containing Pinus tabuliformis, Picea crassifolia, Platycladus orientalis, Sabina chinensis, Juniperus formosana, Berberis thunbergii, Hippophae rhamnoides, and Caragana arborescens.	2,203-2,322 m	适中 Moderate
IV	位于官滩沟管理站向东大约2 km处, 植被主要是农田和灌丛。植物有百合、玫瑰、油菜、荨麻、藜、野草莓、车前子、党参、大黄、益母草、蒲公英、红柳、沙棘。 Located about 2 km east to Guantangou Station, mainly including shrubs and farmerland, and containing Lilium brownii var. viridulum, Rosa rugosa, Brassica napus, Urtica fissa, Chenopodium album, Fragaria vesca, Plantago asiatica, Codonopsis pilosula, Rheum palmatum, Leonurus japonicus, Taraxacum mongolicum, Tamarix ramosissima, and Hippophae rhamnoides.	2,109-2,368 m	弱 Weak
V	位于上庄管理站, 植被主要是高山草甸和针叶林。植物有油松、落叶松及各种杂草。 Located in Shangzhuang Station, mainly including alpine meadow and coniferous forest, and containing Pinus tabuliformis, Larix gmelinii and all kinds of grasses.	2,595-2,848 m	弱 Weak
VI	位于马坡管理站向北约1 km处, 植被主要是针叶林和灌木。植物有油松、落叶松、桦树、小檗、黄芪、当归、党参。 Located about 1 km north to Mapo Station, mainly including coniferous forest and shrubs, and containing Pinus tabuliformis, Larix gmelinii, Betula sp., Berberis thunbergii, Astragalus propinquus, Angelica sinensis, and Codonopsis pilosula.	2,171-2,354 m	适中 Moderate

科名 Family	属数Genus	种数Species	个体数Individual	多样性指数 Diversity index			优势度指数Dominance index (D)	均匀度指数Evenness index (J)	物种丰富度指数Species richness index (R)
科名 Family	属数Genus	种数Species	个体数Individual	属级 Genera H′(G)	种级 Species H′(S)	属、种级 Genera and species H′(GS)	优势度指数Dominance index (D)	均匀度指数Evenness index (J)	物种丰富度指数Species richness index (R)
凤蝶科 Papilionidae	1	4	19	0.0000	1.0938	1.0938	0.5263	0.7890	1.0189
绢蝶科 Parnassiidae	1	1	39	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	1.0000	0.0000	0.0000
粉蝶科 Pieridae	7	21	1,146	1.5720	2.4708	4.0428	0.1483	0.8116	2.8393
眼蝶科 Satyridae	16	23	3,093	1.7215	1.8094	3.5309	0.4413	0.5771	2.7373
蛱蝶科 Nymphalidae	19	33	904	2.1170	2.4108	4.5278	0.3717	0.6895	4.7012
灰蝶科 Lycaenidae	19	30	415	2.1953	2.5394	4.7347	0.2337	0.7466	4.8107
弄蝶科 Hesperiidae	5	7	102	0.7054	1.2761	1.9815	0.8137	0.6558	1.2973
喙蝶科 Libytheidae	1	1	1	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	1.0000	0.0000	0.0000

科名 Family	属数Genus	种数Species	个体数Individual	多样性指数 Diversity index			优势度指数Dominance index (D)	均匀度指数Evenness index (J)	物种丰富度指数Species richness index (R)
科名 Family	属数Genus	种数Species	个体数Individual	属级 Genera H′(G)	种级 Species H′(S)	属、种级 Genera and species H′(GS)	优势度指数Dominance index (D)	均匀度指数Evenness index (J)	物种丰富度指数Species richness index (R)
凤蝶科 Papilionidae	1	4	19	0.0000	1.0938	1.0938	0.5263	0.7890	1.0189
绢蝶科 Parnassiidae	1	1	39	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	1.0000	0.0000	0.0000
粉蝶科 Pieridae	7	21	1,146	1.5720	2.4708	4.0428	0.1483	0.8116	2.8393
眼蝶科 Satyridae	16	23	3,093	1.7215	1.8094	3.5309	0.4413	0.5771	2.7373
蛱蝶科 Nymphalidae	19	33	904	2.1170	2.4108	4.5278	0.3717	0.6895	4.7012
灰蝶科 Lycaenidae	19	30	415	2.1953	2.5394	4.7347	0.2337	0.7466	4.8107
弄蝶科 Hesperiidae	5	7	102	0.7054	1.2761	1.9815	0.8137	0.6558	1.2973
喙蝶科 Libytheidae	1	1	1	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	1.0000	0.0000	0.0000

样线 Line	科数 Family	属数 Genus	种数Species	个体数Individual	多样性指数 Diversity index				优势度指数 Dominance index (D)	均匀度指数 Evenness index (J)	物种丰富度指数 Species richness index (R)
样线 Line	科数 Family	属数 Genus	种数Species	个体数Individual	科级Family H′(F)	属级 Genera H′(G)	种级 Species H′(S)	总多样性 Total H′(FGS)	优势度指数 Dominance index (D)	均匀度指数 Evenness index (J)	物种丰富度指数 Species richness index (R)
样线I Line I	7	50	70	1,777	1.2047	2.7716	3.0379	7.0142	0.2735	0.7151	9.2213
样线II Line II	4	29	35	346	1.0911	2.5062	2.6507	6.2480	0.3237	0.7456	5.8155
样线III Line III	8	49	67	898	1.3225	2.8624	3.0531	7.2380	0.2205	0.7261	9.7056
样线IV Line IV	7	51	75	1,432	1.0342	2.7721	2.9751	6.7814	0.2647	0.6891	10.1833
样线V Line V	4	29	38	406	1.2865	2.7218	2.9964	6.4522	0.1207	0.8237	6.1601
样线VI Line VI	6	41	55	860	1.3217	2.8347	3.0064	7.1628	0.1814	0.7502	7.9918

兴隆山国家级自然保护区不同生境的蝴蝶群落结构与种-多度分布

Butterfly community structure and species-abundance distribution in different habitats in the Xinglong Mountains National Nature Reserve

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 41

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

蝶类个体数范围中位数的log₃N对数级 Log₃N level of median number range of butterfly individuals	蝶类个体数范围(log₃N对数级所对应的个体数范围) Butterfly individual number range (individual number range corresponding to log₃N level)	蝶类个体数范围的中位数 Median number range of butterfly individuals	各对数级所对应的实际蝶类种数 The actual number of butterfly species corresponding to each logarithm level	各对数级所对应的理论蝶类种数 The number of theoretical butterfly species corresponding to each corresponding level
0	1	1	25	15.8188
1	2-4	3	17	25.5643
2	5-13	9	30	30.0000
3	14-40	27	23	25.5643
4	41-121	81	15	15.8188
5	122-364	243	7	7.1078
6	365-1,093	729	2	2.3191
7	1,094-3,280	2,187	1	0.5495

样线 Line	Ⅰ	II	III	IV	V	VI
I		26	45	48	31	44
II	0.3291		27	28	15	25
III	0.4891	0.3600		50	28	43
IV	0.4948	0.3415	0.5434		27	42
V	0.4026	0.2586	0.3636	0.3140		26
VI	0.5432	0.3846	0.5443	0.4773	0.3881

[1]	倪艳梅, 陈莉, 董志远, 孙德斌, 李宝泉, 王绪敏, 陈琳琳. 黄河三角洲湿地生态修复区大型底栖动物群落结构与生态健康评价[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23303-.
[2]	魏嘉欣, 姜治国, 杨林森, 熊欢欢, 金胶胶, 罗方林, 李杰华, 吴浩, 徐耀粘, 乔秀娟, 魏新增, 姚辉, 余辉亮, 杨敬元, 江明喜. 湖北神农架中亚热带山地落叶阔叶林25 ha动态监测样地群落物种组成与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23338-.
[3]	刘啸林, 吴友贵, 张敏华, 陈小荣, 朱志成, 陈定云, 董舒, 李步杭, 丁炳扬, 刘宇. 浙江百山祖25 ha亚热带森林动态监测样地群落组成与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23294-.
[4]	杨舒涵, 王贺, 陈磊, 廖蓥飞, 严光, 伍一宁, 邹红菲. 松嫩平原异质生境对土壤线虫群落特征的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23295-.
[5]	张多鹏, 刘洋, 李正飞, 葛奕豪, 张君倩, 谢志才. 长江上游支流赤水河流域底栖动物物种多样性与保护对策[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 22674-.
[6]	刘彩莲, 许庆, 王林龙, 邢衍阔, 宋稼豪, 林柏岸, 康斌, 刘敏. 闽东近海春秋季游泳动物多样性、密度及群落特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22635-.
[7]	朱晓华, 高程, 王聪, 赵鹏. 尿素对土壤细菌与真菌多样性影响的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22636-.
[8]	毛莹儿, 周秀梅, 王楠, 李秀秀, 尤育克, 白尚斌. 毛竹扩张对杉木林土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22659-.
[9]	陈哲涵, 尹进, 叶吉, 刘冬伟, 毛子昆, 房帅, 蔺菲, 王绪高. 增温对东北温带次生林草本群落季节动态的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 23059-.
[10]	张鹤露, 赵美红, 孙世春, 刘晓收. 西藏那曲市高原盐湖自由生活线虫群落多样性与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22533-.
[11]	魏庐潞, 徐婷婷, 李媛媛, 艾喆, 马飞. 同质园环境和遗传分化影响锦鸡儿属植物根际土壤固氮菌多样性和群落结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22477-.
[12]	林魏巍, 田呈明, 熊典广, 刘伟航, 热依汗古丽·斯地克, 梁英梅. 新疆杨树人工林中蜘蛛群落多样性及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22493-.
[13]	蒋景龙, 颜文博, 胡凤成, 王琦, 孙旺, 李耘, 王勇. 濒危植物秦岭石蝴蝶野外回归早期探索[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22520-.
[14]	赵雯, 王丹丹, 热依拉·木民, 黄开钏, 刘顺, 崔宝凯. 阿尔山地区兴安落叶松林土壤微生物群落结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22258-.
[15]	张伟, 翟东东, 熊飞, 刘红艳, 陈元元, 王莹, 廖传松, 段辛斌, 田辉伍, 邓华堂, 陈大庆. 三峡库区鱼类群落结构和功能多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22136-.