基于森林碳库动态评估神农架国家级自然保护区的保护成效

doi:10.17520/biods.2017240

生物多样性 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 27-35. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017240

所属专题：生物多样性与生态系统功能

• 研究报告: 生态系统多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

基于森林碳库动态评估神农架国家级自然保护区的保护成效

邓舒雨^1,², 董向忠³, 马明哲^1,², 臧振华^1,⁴, 徐文婷¹, 赵常明¹, 谢宗强¹, 申国珍^1,^*()

1 中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093
2 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
3 北京丹青园林绿化有限责任公司, 北京 100093
4 北京林业大学森林资源与生态系统过程北京市重点实验室, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2017-09-05 接受日期:2017-12-10 出版日期:2018-01-20 发布日期:2018-05-05
通讯作者: 申国珍
作者简介:# 共同第一作者
基金资助:
科技基础性工作专项(2015FY1103002)和国家重点研发计划(2016YFC050330304)

Evaluating the effectiveness of Shennongjia National Nature Reserve based on the dynamics of forest carbon pools

Shuyu Deng^1,², Xiangzhong Dong³, Mingzhe Ma^1,², Zhenhua Zang^1,⁴, Wenting Xu¹, Changming Zhao¹, Zongqiang Xie¹, Guozhen Shen^1,^*()

1 State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
3 Beijing Danqing Gardening Co., Ltd, Beijing 100093
4 Key Laboratory for Forest Resources Ecosystem Processes of Beijing, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083

Received:2017-09-05 Accepted:2017-12-10 Online:2018-01-20 Published:2018-05-05
Contact: Shen Guozhen
About author:# Co-first authors

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

保护区是维持生物多样性和生态系统功能的最有效方式, 但其保护成效有待提升, 土地利用变化是重要影响因素之一。本研究以神农架国家级自然保护区为对象, 基于神农架地区近20年的调查研究和数据积累, 通过异速生长模型、生物量方程、抽样加权等方法, 对比分析了土地利用方式转变格局下神农架国家级自然保护区森林生态系统地上、地下、凋落物、粗木质残体、土壤有机碳5个碳库动态, 分析论证了20年间(1990-2010)神农架保护区对森林生态系统碳库的保护成效。研究发现, 林地占神农架保护区总面积的92.76%, 其中针叶林(51.85%)、落叶阔叶林(35.11%)及常绿阔叶林(4.47%)3种森林类型合计占林地面积的98.56%。20年间神农架保护区林地面积增加了0.11%, 灌木林地和耕地面积分别减少了8.85%和6.06%。神农架保护区2010年碳储量为24.24 Tg C (22.57-26.62 Tg C), 土壤有机碳和地上碳合计占全部碳储量的90.68%。常绿阔叶林、落叶阔叶林和针叶林3种森林类型碳储量占神农架保护区碳储量的95%。20年间神农架保护区5个碳库碳储量均有所增加, 共固碳25.04 kt C (21.83-29.57 kt C), 固碳率为1.21 kt C/年(1.09-1.48 kt C/年), 其中地上生物量碳库和土壤有机碳库分别增加14.50 kt C (11.81-18.31 kt C)和6.84 kt C。保护区内总碳库碳密度高于保护区外22.37 t C/ha。研究结果表明, 神农架国家级自然保护区在保护森林固碳能力方面取得了一定的成效。

关键词: 神农架国家级自然保护区, 固碳, 保护成效, 森林, 碳库

Abstract

Nature reserves are a cornerstone of global conservation strategies. However, the effectiveness of the reserve in conserving ecosystem function such as carbon storage is poorly understood. The Shennongjia National Nature Reserve is a conservation icon and has taken exceptional efforts to protect forests. It provides a unique case to address this question. Here, we quantified the carbon storage from aboveground carbon, belowground carbon, litter, coarse woody debris, and soil organic carbon inside and outside the Shennongjia National Nature Reserve between 1990 and 2010, based on inventory data and digitized historical land cover maps. The result showed that the woodland covered 92.76% of the reserve, most of which was coniferous forest (51.85%), deciduous broad-leaved forest (35.11%), and evergreen broad-leaved forest (4.47%). Between 1990 and 2010, the area of the woodland has increased 0.11%, while the area of shrubland and cropland has declined 8.85% and 6.06%, respectively. The Shennongjia National Natural Reserve has accumulated 24.24 Tg carbon (22.57-26.62 Tg C) until 2010, of which 90.68% was contributed by soil organic carbon and aboveground carbon. A total of 95% of the carbon storage in Shennongjia National Nature Reserve are contributed by evergreen broad-leaved forest, deciduous broad-leaved forest and coniferous forest. Between 1990 and 2010, the aboveground carbon pool and soil organic carbon pool has increased 14.50 kt C (11.81-18.31 kt C) and 6.84 kt C, respectively. The carbon density inside the reserve is 22.37 t C/ha higher than that outside the reserve. Our results indicated that the Shennongjia National Nature Reserve is efficiently conserving forest carbon.

Key words: Shennongjia National Nature Reserve, carbon sequestration, conservation effectiveness, forest ecosystem, carbon pool

邓舒雨, 董向忠, 马明哲, 臧振华, 徐文婷, 赵常明, 谢宗强, 申国珍 (2018) 基于森林碳库动态评估神农架国家级自然保护区的保护成效. 生物多样性, 26, 27-35. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017240.

Shuyu Deng, Xiangzhong Dong, Mingzhe Ma, Zhenhua Zang, Wenting Xu, Changming Zhao, Zongqiang Xie, Guozhen Shen (2018) Evaluating the effectiveness of Shennongjia National Nature Reserve based on the dynamics of forest carbon pools. Biodiversity Science, 26, 27-35. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017240.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2017240

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2018/V26/I1/27

图/表 5

参考文献 51

1	Andam KS, Ferraro PJ, Pfaff A, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Robalino JA (2008) Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 16089-16094.
2	Bowker JN, de Vos A, Ament JM, Cumming GS (2017) Effectiveness of Africa’s tropical protected areas for maintaining forest cover. Conservation Biology, 31, 559-569.
3	Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, da Fonseca GAB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science, 291, 125-128.
4	Cao MT, Peng L, Liu SQ (2015) Analysis of the network of protected areas in China based on a geographic perspective: Current status, issues and integration. Sustainability, 7, 15617-15631.
5	Carranza T, Balmford A, Kapos V, Manica A (2014) Protected area effectiveness in reducing conversion in a rapidly vanishing ecosystem: The Brazilian Cerrado. Conservation Letters, 7, 216-223.
6	Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riéra B, Yamakura T (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 145, 87-99.
7	Chen QQ, Xu WQ, Li SG, Fu SL, Yan JH (2013) Aboveground biomass and corresponding carbon sequestration ability of four major forest types in south China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58, 1551-1557.
8	Chen YH, Zhang J, Jiang JP, Nielsen SE, He FL (2017) Assessing the effectiveness of China’s protected areas to conserve current and future amphibian diversity. Diversity and Distributions, 23, 146-157.
9	Cui HX, Xiao WF, Huang ZL, Zeng LX, Pan L, Pang HD (2014) Soil organic carbon storage of three coniferous forests in Shennongjia Nature Reserve. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 42, 69-72.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[崔鸿侠, 肖文发, 黄志霖, 曾立雄, 潘磊, 庞宏东 (2014) 神农架3种针叶林土壤碳储量比较. 东北林业大学学报, 42, 69-72.]
10	Cui HX, Xiao WF, Pan L, Huang ZL, Wang XR, Pang HD (2012) Characteristics of soil carbon storage of Abies fargesii forest in Shennongjia. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 48, 107-111.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[崔鸿侠, 肖文发, 潘磊, 黄志霖, 王晓荣, 庞宏东 (2012) 神农架巴山冷杉林土壤碳储量特征. 林业科学, 48, 107-111.]
11	Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, Houghton RA, Trexier MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 263, 185-190.
12	Editorial Committee of Hubei Shennongjia Forestry District Local Chronicles(1996) Shennongjia chronicles. Hubei Science and Technology Press, Wuhan.(in Chinese)
	[湖北省神农架林区地方志编纂委员会(1996) 神农架志. 湖北科学技术出版社, 武汉.]
13	Fang JY, Chen AP, Peng CH, Zhao SQ, Ci LJ (2001) Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 292, 2320-2322.
14	Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science, 309, 570-574.
15	Gaston KJ, Jackson SF, Cantú-Salazar L, Cruz-Piñón G (2008) The ecological performance of protected areas. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 93-113.
16	Hengl T, de Jesus JM, Heuvelink GBM, Gonzalez MR, Kilibarda M, Blagotic A, Shangguan W, Wright MN, Geng XY, Bauer-Marschallinger B, Guevara MA, Vargas R, MacMillan RA, Batjes NH, Leenaars JGB, Ribeiro E, Wheeler I, Mantel S, Kempen B (2017) SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE, 12, e0169748.
17	Hill R, Miller C, Newell B, Dunlop M, Gordon IJ (2015) Why biodiversity declines as protected areas increase: The effect of the power of governance regimes on sustainable landscapes. Sustainability Science, 10, 357-369.
18	Houghton RA, House JI, Pongratz J, van der Werf GR, DeFries RS, Hansen MC, Le Quéré C, Ramankutty N (2012) Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change. Biogeosciences Discussions, 9, 835-878.
19	IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Kanagawa, Japan.
20	Jenkins CN, van Houtan KS, Pimm SL, Sexton JO (2015) US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 122, 5081-5086.
21	Joppa LN, Loarie SR, Pimm SL (2008) On the protection of “protected areas”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 6673-6678.
22	Joppa LN, Pfaff A (2009) High and far: Biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS ONE, 4, e8273.
23	Juffe-Bignoli D, Burgess ND, Bingham H, Belle EMS, de Lima MG, Deguignet M, Bertzky B, Milam AN, Martinez-Lopez J, Lewis E, Eassom A, Wicander S, Geldmann J, van Soesbergen A, Arnell AP, O’Connor B, Park S, Shi YN, Danks FS, MacSharry B, Kingston N (2014) Protected Planet Report 2014. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
24	Lai L, Huang XJ, Yang H, Chuai XW, Zhang M, Zhong TY, Chen ZG, Chen Y, Wang X, Thompson JR (2016) Carbon emissions from land-use change and management in China between 1990 and 2010. Science Advances, 2, e1601063.
25	Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes OT, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George PS, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li XB, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skånes H, Steffen W, Stone GD, Svedin U, Veldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu JC (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11, 261-269.
26	Luo YJ, Wang XK, Lu F (2015) Comprehensive Database of Biomass Regressions for China’s Tree Species. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing.(in Chinese)
	[罗云建, 王效科, 逯非 (2015) 中国主要林木生物量模型手册. 中国林业出版社, 北京.]
27	Ma MZ, Shen GZ, Xiong GM, Zhao CM, Xu WT, Zhou YB, Xie ZQ (2017) Characteristic and representativeness of the vertical vegetation zonation along the altitudinal gradient in Shennongjia Natural Heritage. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 41, 1127-1139.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[马明哲, 申国珍, 熊高明, 赵常明, 徐文婷, 周友兵, 谢宗强 (2017) 神农架自然遗产地植被垂直带谱的特点和代表性. 植物生态学报, 41, 1127-1139.]
28	Nogueira EM, Fearnside PM, Nelson BW, Barbosa RI, Keizer EWH (2008) Estimates of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: New allometric equations and adjustments to biomass from wood-volume inventories. Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 1853-1867.
29	Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Xiao Y, Polasky S, Liu JG, Xu WH, Wang Q, Zhang L, Xiao Y, Rao EM, Jiang L, Lu F, Wang XK, Yang GB, Gong SH, Wu BF, Zeng Y, Yang W, Daily GC (2016) Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 352, 1455-1459.
30	Pouzols FM, Toivonen T, Minin ED, Kukkala A, Kullberg P, Kuusterä J, Lehtomäki J, Tenkanen H, Verburg PH, Moilanen A (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature, 516, 383-386.
31	Ren GP, Young SS, Wang L, Wang W, Long YC, Wu RD, Li JS, Zhu JG, Yu DW (2015) Effectiveness of China’s national forest protection program and nature reserves. Conservation Biology, 29, 1368-1377.
32	Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M, Long JS, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Xie Y (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature, 428, 637-640.
33	Scharlemann JPW, Kapos V, Campbell A, Lysenko I, Burgess ND, Hansen MC, Gibbs HK, Dickson B, Miles L (2010) Securing tropical forest carbon: The contribution of protected areas to REDD. Oryx, 44, 352-357.
34	Scherer L, Curran M, Alvarez M (2017) Expanding Kenya’s protected areas under the convention on biological diversity to maximize coverage of plant diversity. Conservation Biology, 31, 302-310.
35	Schimel D, Melillo J, Tian HQ, McGuire AD, Kicklighter D, Kittel T, Rosenbloom N, Running S, Thornton P, Ojima D, Parton W, Kelly R, Sykes M, Neilson R, Rizzo B (2000) Contribution of increasing CO2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems in the United States. Science, 287, 2004-2006.
36	Schlesinger WH (1990) Evidence from chronosequence studies for a low carbon-storage potential of soils. Nature, 348, 232-234.
37	Singh V, Tewari A, Kushwaha SPS, Dadhwal VK (2011) Formulating allometric equations for estimating biomass and carbon stock in small diameter trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 1945-1949.
38	Tans PP, Fung IY, Takahashi T (1990) Observational constraints on the global atmospheric CO2 budget. Science, 247, 1431-1438.
39	Technical Manual Writing Group of Ecosystem Carbon Sequestration Project(2015) Observation and Investigation for Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Science Press, Beijing.(in Chinese)
	[生态系统固碳项目技术规范编写组(2015) 生态系统固碳观测与调查技术规范. 科学出版社, 北京.]
40	Thomas CD, Gillingham PK, Bradbury RB, Roy DB, Anderson BJ, Baxter JM, Bourn NAD, Crick HQP, Findon RA, Fox R, Hodgson JA, Holt AR, Morecroft MD, O’Hanlon NJ, Oliver TH, Pearce-Higgins JW, Procter DA, Thomas JA, Walker KJ, Walmsley CA, Wilson RJ, Hill JK (2012) Protected areas facilitate species’ range expansions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 14063-14068.
41	Wang CL, Zang ZH, Qiu Y, Deng SY, Feng ZY, Xie ZQ, Xu WT, Liu L, Chen QS, Shen GZ (2017) The effectiveness of Shennongjia National Nature Reserve in conserving forests and habitat of Sichuan snub-nosed monkey. Biodiversity Science, 25, 504-512.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王翠玲, 臧振华, 邱月, 邓舒雨, 冯朝阳, 谢宗强, 徐文婷, 刘蕾, 陈全胜, 申国珍 (2017) 湖北神农架国家级自然保护区森林和川金丝猴栖息地的保护成效. 生物多样性, 25, 504-512.]
42	Willcock S, Phillips OL, Platts PJ, Balmford A, Burgess ND, Lovett JC, Ahrends A, Bayliss J, Doggart N, Doody K, Fanning E, Green JMH, Hall J, Howell KL, Marchant R, Marshall AR, Mbilinyi B, Munishi PKT, Owen N, Swetnam RD, Topp-Jorgensen EJ, Lewis SL (2012) Towards regional, error-bounded landscape carbon storage estimates for data-deficient areas of the world. PLoS ONE, 7, e44795.
43	Willcock S, Phillips OL, Platts PJ, Swetnam RD, Balmford A, Burgess ND, Ahrends A, Bayliss J, Doggart N, Doody K, Fanning E, Green JMH, Hall J, Howell KL, Lovett JC, Marchant R, Marshall AR, Mbilinyi B, Munishi PKT, Owen N, Topp-Jorgensen EJ, Lewis SL (2016) Land cover change and carbon emissions over 100 years in an African biodiversity hotspot. Global Change Biology, 22, 2787-2800.
44	Wu BF, Yuan QZ, Yan CZ, Wang ZM, Yu XF, Li AN, Ma RH, Huang JL, Chen JS, Chang C, Liu CL, Zhang L, Li XS, Zeng Y, Bao AM (2014) Land cover changes of China from 2000 to 2010. Quaternary Sciences, 34, 723-731.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[吴炳方, 苑全治, 颜长珍, 王宗明, 于信芳, 李爱农, 马荣华, 黄进良, 陈劲松, 常存, 刘成林, 张磊, 李晓松, 曾源, 包安明 (2014) 21世纪前十年的中国土地覆盖变化. 第四纪研究, 34, 723-731.]
45	Wu RD, Zhang S, Yu DW, Zhao P, Li XH, Wang LZ, Yu Q, Ma J, Chen A, Long YC (2011) Effectiveness of China’s nature reserves in representing ecological diversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 383-389.
46	Xiang WH, Liu SH, Deng XW, Shen AH, Lei XD, Tian DL, Zhao MF, Peng CH (2011) General allometric equations and biomass allocation of Pinus massoniana trees on a regional scale in southern China. Ecological Research, 26, 697-711.
47	Xie ZB, Zhu JG, Liu G, Cadisch G, Hasegawa T, Chen CM, Sun HF, Tang HY, Zeng Q (2007) Soil organic carbon stocks in China and changes from 1980s to 2000s. Global Change Biology, 13, 1989-2007.
48	Xie ZQ, Shen GZ, Zhou YB, Fan DY, Xu WT, Gao XM, Du YJ, Xiong GM, Zhao CM, Zhu Y, Lai JS (2017) The outstanding universal value and conservation of the Shennongjia World Natural Heritage Site. Biodiversity Science, 25, 490-497.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[谢宗强, 申国珍, 周友兵, 樊大勇, 徐文婷, 高贤明, 杜彦君, 熊高明, 赵常明, 祝燕, 赖江山 (2017) 神农架世界自然遗产地的全球突出普遍价值及其保护. 生物多样性, 25, 490-497.]
49	Xu WH, Xiao Y, Zhang JJ, Yang W, Zhang L, Hull V, Wang Z, Zheng H, Liu JG, Polasky S, Jiang L, Xiao Y, Shi XW, Rao EM, Lu F, Wang XK, Daily GC, Ouyang ZY (2017) Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, 1601-1606.
50	Zhang L, Wu BF, Li XS, Xing Q (2014) Classification system of China land cover for carbon budget. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 7158-7166.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张磊, 吴炳方, 李晓松, 邢强 (2014) 基于碳收支的中国土地覆被分类系统. 生态学报, 34, 7158-7166.]
51	Zheng Z, Zhan YH, Xie JL (1997) Shennongjia of China. Hubei Science and Technology Press, Wuhan.(in Chinese)
	[郑重, 詹亚华, 谢继伦 (1997) 中国神农架. 湖北科学技术出版社, 武汉.]

土地利用类型 Land use type	1990年面积 Area in 1990 (ha)	1990年占比 Proportion in 1990 (%)	2010年面积 Area in 2010 (ha)	2010年占比 Proportion in 2010 (%)
常绿阔叶林 Evergreen broad-leaved forest	3,245.71	4.46	3,249.13	4.47
落叶阔叶林 Deciduous broad-leaved forest	25,448.97	34.99	25,532.75	35.11
针叶林 Coniferous forest	37,694.08	51.83	37,713.32	51.85
针阔混交林 Coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest	622.14	0.86	624.78	0.86
灌木林 Shrubland	380.97	0.52	347.26	0.48
耕地 Cropland	2,056.3	2.83	1,931.7	2.66
其他 Other	3,281.99	4.51	3,331.22	4.58

土地利用类型 Land use type	1990年面积 Area in 1990 (ha)	1990年占比 Proportion in 1990 (%)	2010年面积 Area in 2010 (ha)	2010年占比 Proportion in 2010 (%)
常绿阔叶林 Evergreen broad-leaved forest	3,245.71	4.46	3,249.13	4.47
落叶阔叶林 Deciduous broad-leaved forest	25,448.97	34.99	25,532.75	35.11
针叶林 Coniferous forest	37,694.08	51.83	37,713.32	51.85
针阔混交林 Coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest	622.14	0.86	624.78	0.86
灌木林 Shrubland	380.97	0.52	347.26	0.48
耕地 Cropland	2,056.3	2.83	1,931.7	2.66
其他 Other	3,281.99	4.51	3,331.22	4.58

	地上碳库 Aboveground carbon	地下碳库 Belowground carbon	凋落物碳库 Litter carbon	粗木质残体碳库 Coarse woody debris carbon	土壤有机碳库 Soil organic carbon	总计 Total
1990 (Tg C)	8.57	1.80	0.29	0.16	13.40	24.21
2000 (Tg C)	8.58	1.81	0.29	0.16	13.40	24.23
2010 (Tg C)	8.58	1.81	0.29	0.16	13.40	24.24
1990-2010年变化量 △C_storage1990-2010 (kt C) (1990-2000; 2000-2010)	14.50 (13.93; 0.57)	3.01 (2.88; 0.13)	0.21 (0.44; -0.24)	0.49 (0.52; -0.03)	6.84 (3.97; 2.87)	25.04 (21.74; 3.30)
1990-2010年变化率 Change rate of carbon storage during 1990-2010 (%) (1990-2000; 2000-2010)	0.17 (0.16; 0.01)	0.17 (0.16; 0.01)	0.07 (0.16; -0.02)	0.30 (0.32; -0.02)	0.05 (0.03; 0.02)	0.10 (0.09; 0.01)

	地上碳库 Aboveground carbon	地下碳库 Belowground carbon	凋落物碳库 Litter carbon	粗木质残体碳库 Coarse woody debris carbon	土壤有机碳库 Soil organic carbon	总计 Total
1990 (Tg C)	8.57	1.80	0.29	0.16	13.40	24.21
2000 (Tg C)	8.58	1.81	0.29	0.16	13.40	24.23
2010 (Tg C)	8.58	1.81	0.29	0.16	13.40	24.24
1990-2010年变化量 △C_storage1990-2010 (kt C) (1990-2000; 2000-2010)	14.50 (13.93; 0.57)	3.01 (2.88; 0.13)	0.21 (0.44; -0.24)	0.49 (0.52; -0.03)	6.84 (3.97; 2.87)	25.04 (21.74; 3.30)
1990-2010年变化率 Change rate of carbon storage during 1990-2010 (%) (1990-2000; 2000-2010)	0.17 (0.16; 0.01)	0.17 (0.16; 0.01)	0.07 (0.16; -0.02)	0.30 (0.32; -0.02)	0.05 (0.03; 0.02)	0.10 (0.09; 0.01)

	地上碳库 Aboveground carbon		地下碳库 Belowground carbon		凋落物碳库 Litter carbon		粗木质残体碳库 Coarse woody debris carbon		土壤有机碳库 Soil organic carbon		总计 Total
	内 Inside	外 Outside	内 Inside	外 Outside	内 Inside	外 Outside	内 Inside	外 Outside	内 Inside	外 Outside	内 Inside	外 Outside
1990	117.76	121.10	24.77	25.42	3.92	4.00	2.22	2.51	184.21	157.04	332.87	310.08
2000	117.95	121.63	24.81	25.53	3.93	4.02	2.22	2.52	184.26	157.20	333.17	310.90
2010	117.96	121.60	24.81	25.53	3.92	4.02	2.22	2.51	184.30	157.19	333.22	310.85
1990-2010年增加量 △C_dendity1990-2010 (1990-2000; 2000-2010)	0.20 (0.19; 0.01)	0.50 (0.52; -0.02)	0.04 (0.04; 0)	0.10 (0.11; -0.01)	0 (0.01; 0)	0.02 (0.02; -0.01)	0.01 (0.01;0)	0.01 (0.01; 0)	0.09 (0.05; 0.04)	0.15 (0.16; -0.01)	0.34 (0.30; 0.04)	0.77 (0.82; -0.05)

基于森林碳库动态评估神农架国家级自然保护区的保护成效

Evaluating the effectiveness of Shennongjia National Nature Reserve based on the dynamics of forest carbon pools

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 51

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	艾妍雨, 胡海霞, 沈婷, 莫雨轩, 杞金华, 宋亮. 附生维管植物多样性及其与宿主特征的相关性: 以哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 24072-.
[2]	刘啸林, 吴友贵, 张敏华, 陈小荣, 朱志成, 陈定云, 董舒, 李步杭, 丁炳扬, 刘宇. 浙江百山祖25 ha亚热带森林动态监测样地群落组成与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23294-.
[3]	李发扬, 李滢钰, 蒋文妮, 刘曙光, 霍超, 孙巧奇, 邹红菲. 火后恢复时间影响大兴安岭寒温带森林内部与边缘鸟类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22665-.
[4]	楼晨阳, 任海保, 陈小南, 米湘成, 童冉, 朱念福, 陈磊, 吴统贵, 申小莉. 钱江源国家公园森林群落的物种多样性、结构多样性及其对黑麂出现概率的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22518-.
[5]	赵坤明, 陈圣宾, 杨锡福. 基于红外相机技术调查四川都江堰破碎化森林鸟兽多样性及优势种活动节律[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22529-.
[6]	董庆栋, 陈超男, 李艳红, 赵体侠, 孙梓欣, 张哲, 朱连奇. 基于NPP和人类扰动指数评估河南伏牛山地区国家级自然保护区群保护成效与溢出/泄漏效应[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22503-.
[7]	陈星, 涂淑雯, 戴尊, 高爽, 王幼芳, 邢诗晨, 魏博嘉, 唐录艳, 师瑞萍, 王晓蕊, 刘永英, 赵东平, 唐霞, 姚雪, 赵明水, 吴晗星, 祁祥斌, 张健, 李敏, 王健. 浙江天目山国家级自然保护区苔藓植物多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22649-.
[8]	薛玉洁, 程安鹏, 李珊, 刘晓娟, 李景文. 亚热带森林中环境和物种多样性对灌木存活的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22443-.
[9]	唐楚飞, 葛成, 曹烨, 曹弘毅, 宋晓晓, 廖怀建. 城市森林不同林分类型的昆虫多样性: 以南京紫金山南麓为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22357-.
[10]	商晓凡, 张健, 高浩杰, 库伟鹏, 毕玉科, 李修鹏, 阎恩荣. 岛屿面积与气候共同影响舟山群岛种子植物丰富度格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(12): 23392-.
[11]	徐学红, 王巍伟, 米湘成, 陈磊, 马克平. 中国森林生物多样性监测网络(CForBio): 二十年进展与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(12): 23354-.
[12]	杨涛, 沈泽昊, 王晓凤, 饶杰生, 刘文聪, 田希, 陈稀, 张秋雨, 刘倩, 钱恒君, 解宇阳, 刘其明, 徐衍潇, 涂梦灵, 单子铭, 张玉坤, 侯波, 李建斌, 欧晓昆. 滇中高原亚热带半湿润常绿阔叶林植物群落多样性特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23238-.
[13]	左艳洁, 彭明春, 王崇云, 沈泽昊, 李永萍, 周新茂, 周杰, 周光信, 任佳昕, 刘忠安. 滇中高原半湿润常绿阔叶林的岛屿化与物种多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23252-.
[14]	边琦, 王成, 程贺, 韩丹, 赵伊琳, 殷鲁秦. 声学指数在城市森林鸟类多样性评估中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22080-.
[15]	孙翊斐, 王士政, 冯佳伟, 王天明. 东北虎豹国家公园森林声景的昼夜和季节变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22523-.