生物多样性 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 518-530. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016369
盛芳1, 陈淑英2, 田嘉1,*(), 李鹏1, 秦雪1, 罗淑萍1, 李疆1,*()
收稿日期:
2016-12-27
接受日期:
2017-03-20
出版日期:
2017-05-20
发布日期:
2017-06-06
通讯作者:
田嘉,李疆
基金资助:
Fang Sheng1, Shuying Chen2, Jia Tian1,*(), Peng Li1, Xue Qin1, Shuping Luo1, Jiang Li1,*()
Received:
2016-12-27
Accepted:
2017-03-20
Online:
2017-05-20
Published:
2017-06-06
Contact:
Tian Jia,Li Jiang
摘要:
为了揭示新疆准噶尔山楂(Crataegus songorica)不同居群的遗传多样性, 为其合理保护与利用提供科学依据, 采用表型性状变异分析和SSR分子标记相结合的方法, 对新疆霍城大西沟准噶尔山楂的5个不同居群的92个个体进行遗传多样性分析。结果表明: (1) 33个表型性状的变异系数在2.96-71.32%之间, 表型性状之间存在着丰富的变异。居群间的平均表型分化系数为13.90%, 而居群内的平均表型分化系数为86.10%, 表明新疆准噶尔山楂居群内的变异是其表型变异的主要来源。(2) 43对SSR引物共检测到739个位点, 物种水平上多态性位点比率为90.53%, Nei’s多样性指数和Shannon多样性指数(I)分别为0.2377和0.3712, 居群内基因多样度(Hs)为0.1635, 总居群基因多样度(Ht)为0.2023, 居群间遗传分化系数(Gst)为0.1916, 基因流(Nm)为2.1116。新疆准噶尔山楂总的遗传多样性水平较高, 居群间遗传分化较小。UPGMA聚类结果显示5个居群形成2个亚类, 不同居群所处的生境的不同是引起居群间差异的主要原因。研究表明, 新疆准噶尔山楂不同居群在表型和分子水平均具有较高的遗传多样性, 居群内的遗传分化较大, 并且分化趋势具有地域性, 因此可以选择就地保护。
盛芳, 陈淑英, 田嘉, 李鹏, 秦雪, 罗淑萍, 李疆 (2017) 新疆准噶尔山楂不同居群的遗传多样性. 生物多样性, 25, 518-530. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016369.
Fang Sheng, Shuying Chen, Jia Tian, Peng Li, Xue Qin, Shuping Luo, Jiang Li (2017) Genetic diversity of Crataegus songorica in Xinjiang. Biodiversity Science, 25, 518-530. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016369.
居群代码 Population | 北纬 Latitude (N) | 东经 Longitude (E) | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 样本数 Sample size |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pop1 | 44°23′55.1″-44°24′73.0″ | 80°45′81.6″-80°46′15.1″ | 1,000-1,100 | 14 |
Pop2 | 44°23′45.5″-44°25′97.0″ | 80°40′15.1″-80°46′65.7″ | 1,100-1,200 | 25 |
Pop3 | 44°24′78.9″-44°26′25.2″ | 80°45′57.1″-80°48′31.4″ | 1,200-1,300 | 24 |
Pop4 | 44°25′86.6″-44°25′94.2″ | 80°45′67.0″-80°46′06.5″ | 1,300-1,400 | 19 |
Pop5 | 44°25′92.1″-44°26′17.6″ | 80°45′78.9″-80°46′28.3″ | 1,400-1,500 | 10 |
表1 准噶尔山楂各居群采样地的地理信息及样本数
Table 1 Geographic information and sample size of Crataegus songorica in different populations
居群代码 Population | 北纬 Latitude (N) | 东经 Longitude (E) | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 样本数 Sample size |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pop1 | 44°23′55.1″-44°24′73.0″ | 80°45′81.6″-80°46′15.1″ | 1,000-1,100 | 14 |
Pop2 | 44°23′45.5″-44°25′97.0″ | 80°40′15.1″-80°46′65.7″ | 1,100-1,200 | 25 |
Pop3 | 44°24′78.9″-44°26′25.2″ | 80°45′57.1″-80°48′31.4″ | 1,200-1,300 | 24 |
Pop4 | 44°25′86.6″-44°25′94.2″ | 80°45′67.0″-80°46′06.5″ | 1,300-1,400 | 19 |
Pop5 | 44°25′92.1″-44°26′17.6″ | 80°45′78.9″-80°46′28.3″ | 1,400-1,500 | 10 |
表型性状 Phenotypic traits | 平均值 Mean value | 变异系数 Coefficient of variance (%) | 居群平均值 Average of population | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pop1 | Pop2 | Pop3 | Pop4 | Pop5 | 变异系数 CV (%) | 相对极差 Ri′ | ||||
一年生枝长 Annual branch length (mm) | 109.09 | 42.64 | 44.92 | 39.57 | 30.81 | 24.69 | 36.53 | 0.68 | ||
一年生枝粗 Annual branch diameter (mm) | 3.52 | 14.96 | 16.27 | 24.10 | 9.61 | 10.81 | 15.15 | 0.52 | ||
新梢长 New branch length (mm) | 178.99 | 23.99 | 34.87 | 40.43 | 29.13 | 16.63 | 29.01 | 0.59 | ||
单果重 Fruit weight (g) | 0.93 | 11.60 | 19.94 | 13.99 | 17.34 | 5.12 | 13.60 | 0.54 | ||
果实纵径 Fruit longitudinal diameter (mm) | 12.46 | 2.68 | 5.57 | 4.03 | 4.47 | 0.71 | 3.49 | 0.51 | ||
果实横径 Fruit diameter (mm) | 11.38 | 5.98 | 8.97 | 6.05 | 6.23 | 1.96 | 5.84 | 0.52 | ||
果柄长 Fruit stalk length (mm) | 11.02 | 9.85 | 17.01 | 11.85 | 6.14 | 13.77 | 11.72 | 0.47 | ||
果柄粗 Fruit stalk thickness (mm) | 0.63 | 5.76 | 15.01 | 6.70 | 11.71 | 5.38 | 8.91 | 0.41 | ||
坐果数 Fruit set number | 3.21 | 13.22 | 27.39 | 10.35 | 37.67 | 4.33 | 18.59 | 0.45 | ||
果实硬度 Fruit hardness (kg/cm2) | 1.77 | 8.33 | 20.20 | 18.68 | 14.09 | 5.61 | 13.38 | 0.51 | ||
可固性 Soluble solids (%) | 15.18 | 11.75 | 19.18 | 13.56 | 9.25 | 4.72 | 11.69 | 0.50 | ||
果实形状 Fruit shape | 3.36 | 79.52 | 68.12 | 68.27 | 72.54 | 68.12 | 71.32 | 0.45 | ||
果皮颜色 Peel color | 5.87 | 21.34 | 29.41 | 30.25 | 24.98 | 22.22 | 25.64 | 0.67 | ||
果肉颜色 Flesh color | 4.05 | 18.47 | 25.85 | 26.70 | 21.64 | 14.52 | 21.44 | 0.56 | ||
果实风味 Fruit flavor | 2.08 | 50.25 | 50.22 | 47.67 | 57.57 | 50.25 | 51.19 | 0.56 | ||
叶厚 Leaf thickness (mm) | 0.27 | 15.41 | 17.74 | 18.22 | 21.10 | 26.86 | 19.87 | 0.67 | ||
叶面积 Leaf area (cm2) | 15.48 | 24.29 | 22.54 | 21.38 | 19.10 | 13.72 | 20.20 | 0.60 | ||
叶宽 Leaf width (cm) | 5.18 | 8.89 | 10.55 | 8.67 | 8.10 | 1.85 | 7.61 | 0.53 | ||
叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 5.48 | 13.22 | 10.93 | 11.20 | 8.31 | 1.69 | 9.07 | 0.60 | ||
叶形指数 Leaf length/leaf width | 1.06 | 7.48 | 6.16 | 4.20 | 5.96 | 0.16 | 4.79 | 0.54 | ||
叶柄长 Petiole length (mm) | 25.99 | 16.46 | 17.39 | 14.26 | 19.27 | 15.22 | 16.52 | 0.63 | ||
叶柄粗 Petiole thickness (mm) | 1.14 | 32.05 | 15.19 | 16.82 | 13.06 | 7.64 | 16.95 | 0.62 | ||
叶柄指数 Petiole length/petiole thickness | 23.65 | 32.62 | 25.83 | 25.49 | 28.11 | 22.73 | 26.96 | 0.71 | ||
叶片颜色 Leaf color | 3.00 | 23.89 | 27.19 | 26.83 | 21.32 | 25.27 | 24.90 | 0.41 | ||
叶基形态 Leaf base morphology | 2.82 | 55.17 | 35.88 | 36.93 | 41.57 | 47.02 | 43.31 | 0.62 | ||
叶缘形态 Leaf margin morphology | 2.78 | 13.22 | 17.68 | 14.92 | 16.59 | 13.52 | 15.19 | 0.70 | ||
叶面状态 Status of leaf surface | 1.29 | 50.25 | 41.61 | 52.36 | 43.86 | 34.26 | 44.47 | 0.59 | ||
托叶形状 Stipule shape | 2.49 | 20.10 | 26.98 | 23.53 | 20.10 | 20.10 | 22.16 | 0.74 | ||
果核数 Stone number | 1.99 | 2.24 | 3.74 | 4.07 | 1.86 | 2.89 | 2.96 | 0.48 | ||
鲜核重 Fresh stone weight (g) | 0.24 | 9.25 | 10.88 | 13.52 | 13.29 | 2.61 | 9.91 | 0.55 | ||
果核纵径 Longitudinal diameter of stone (mm) | 7.35 | 2.11 | 3.38 | 3.71 | 4.59 | 1.02 | 2.96 | 0.56 | ||
果核横径 Stone diameter (mm) | 6.17 | 4.13 | 3.54 | 4.73 | 6.19 | 2.86 | 4.29 | 0.58 | ||
花序小花数 Floret number of inflorescence | 12.08 | 34.40 | 27.70 | 26.32 | 11.82 | 0.06 | 20.06 | 0.51 | ||
平均值 Mean value | 14.61 | 20.77 | 22.06 | 20.89 | 19.92 | 14.80 | 19.69 | 0.56 |
表2 准噶尔山楂各居群表型性状变异系数统计表
Table 2 Statistic CV of phenotypic characteristics in Crataegus songorica populations
表型性状 Phenotypic traits | 平均值 Mean value | 变异系数 Coefficient of variance (%) | 居群平均值 Average of population | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pop1 | Pop2 | Pop3 | Pop4 | Pop5 | 变异系数 CV (%) | 相对极差 Ri′ | ||||
一年生枝长 Annual branch length (mm) | 109.09 | 42.64 | 44.92 | 39.57 | 30.81 | 24.69 | 36.53 | 0.68 | ||
一年生枝粗 Annual branch diameter (mm) | 3.52 | 14.96 | 16.27 | 24.10 | 9.61 | 10.81 | 15.15 | 0.52 | ||
新梢长 New branch length (mm) | 178.99 | 23.99 | 34.87 | 40.43 | 29.13 | 16.63 | 29.01 | 0.59 | ||
单果重 Fruit weight (g) | 0.93 | 11.60 | 19.94 | 13.99 | 17.34 | 5.12 | 13.60 | 0.54 | ||
果实纵径 Fruit longitudinal diameter (mm) | 12.46 | 2.68 | 5.57 | 4.03 | 4.47 | 0.71 | 3.49 | 0.51 | ||
果实横径 Fruit diameter (mm) | 11.38 | 5.98 | 8.97 | 6.05 | 6.23 | 1.96 | 5.84 | 0.52 | ||
果柄长 Fruit stalk length (mm) | 11.02 | 9.85 | 17.01 | 11.85 | 6.14 | 13.77 | 11.72 | 0.47 | ||
果柄粗 Fruit stalk thickness (mm) | 0.63 | 5.76 | 15.01 | 6.70 | 11.71 | 5.38 | 8.91 | 0.41 | ||
坐果数 Fruit set number | 3.21 | 13.22 | 27.39 | 10.35 | 37.67 | 4.33 | 18.59 | 0.45 | ||
果实硬度 Fruit hardness (kg/cm2) | 1.77 | 8.33 | 20.20 | 18.68 | 14.09 | 5.61 | 13.38 | 0.51 | ||
可固性 Soluble solids (%) | 15.18 | 11.75 | 19.18 | 13.56 | 9.25 | 4.72 | 11.69 | 0.50 | ||
果实形状 Fruit shape | 3.36 | 79.52 | 68.12 | 68.27 | 72.54 | 68.12 | 71.32 | 0.45 | ||
果皮颜色 Peel color | 5.87 | 21.34 | 29.41 | 30.25 | 24.98 | 22.22 | 25.64 | 0.67 | ||
果肉颜色 Flesh color | 4.05 | 18.47 | 25.85 | 26.70 | 21.64 | 14.52 | 21.44 | 0.56 | ||
果实风味 Fruit flavor | 2.08 | 50.25 | 50.22 | 47.67 | 57.57 | 50.25 | 51.19 | 0.56 | ||
叶厚 Leaf thickness (mm) | 0.27 | 15.41 | 17.74 | 18.22 | 21.10 | 26.86 | 19.87 | 0.67 | ||
叶面积 Leaf area (cm2) | 15.48 | 24.29 | 22.54 | 21.38 | 19.10 | 13.72 | 20.20 | 0.60 | ||
叶宽 Leaf width (cm) | 5.18 | 8.89 | 10.55 | 8.67 | 8.10 | 1.85 | 7.61 | 0.53 | ||
叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 5.48 | 13.22 | 10.93 | 11.20 | 8.31 | 1.69 | 9.07 | 0.60 | ||
叶形指数 Leaf length/leaf width | 1.06 | 7.48 | 6.16 | 4.20 | 5.96 | 0.16 | 4.79 | 0.54 | ||
叶柄长 Petiole length (mm) | 25.99 | 16.46 | 17.39 | 14.26 | 19.27 | 15.22 | 16.52 | 0.63 | ||
叶柄粗 Petiole thickness (mm) | 1.14 | 32.05 | 15.19 | 16.82 | 13.06 | 7.64 | 16.95 | 0.62 | ||
叶柄指数 Petiole length/petiole thickness | 23.65 | 32.62 | 25.83 | 25.49 | 28.11 | 22.73 | 26.96 | 0.71 | ||
叶片颜色 Leaf color | 3.00 | 23.89 | 27.19 | 26.83 | 21.32 | 25.27 | 24.90 | 0.41 | ||
叶基形态 Leaf base morphology | 2.82 | 55.17 | 35.88 | 36.93 | 41.57 | 47.02 | 43.31 | 0.62 | ||
叶缘形态 Leaf margin morphology | 2.78 | 13.22 | 17.68 | 14.92 | 16.59 | 13.52 | 15.19 | 0.70 | ||
叶面状态 Status of leaf surface | 1.29 | 50.25 | 41.61 | 52.36 | 43.86 | 34.26 | 44.47 | 0.59 | ||
托叶形状 Stipule shape | 2.49 | 20.10 | 26.98 | 23.53 | 20.10 | 20.10 | 22.16 | 0.74 | ||
果核数 Stone number | 1.99 | 2.24 | 3.74 | 4.07 | 1.86 | 2.89 | 2.96 | 0.48 | ||
鲜核重 Fresh stone weight (g) | 0.24 | 9.25 | 10.88 | 13.52 | 13.29 | 2.61 | 9.91 | 0.55 | ||
果核纵径 Longitudinal diameter of stone (mm) | 7.35 | 2.11 | 3.38 | 3.71 | 4.59 | 1.02 | 2.96 | 0.56 | ||
果核横径 Stone diameter (mm) | 6.17 | 4.13 | 3.54 | 4.73 | 6.19 | 2.86 | 4.29 | 0.58 | ||
花序小花数 Floret number of inflorescence | 12.08 | 34.40 | 27.70 | 26.32 | 11.82 | 0.06 | 20.06 | 0.51 | ||
平均值 Mean value | 14.61 | 20.77 | 22.06 | 20.89 | 19.92 | 14.80 | 19.69 | 0.56 |
性状 Traits | 均方 Mean square | F | Sig | 方差分量 Variance components | 表型分化系数 VST (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
居群内 Within population | 居群间 Among populations | 居群内 Within population | 居群间 Among populations | ||||
一年生枝长 Annual branch length (mm) | 1,851.668 | 1,475.734 | 0.797 | 0.530 | 1,815.1961 | 251.5190 | 12.17 |
一年生枝粗 Annual branch diameter (mm) | 0.388 | 0.630 | 1.624 | 0.176 | 0.3944 | 0.0421 | 9.64 |
新梢长 New branch length (mm) | 3,494.973 | 5,356.658 | 1.533 | 0.200 | 3,537.9271 | 680.9977 | 16.14 |
单果重 Fruit weight (g) | 0.026 | 0.180 | 6.936 | 0.000 | 0.0323 | 0.0157 | 32.67 |
果实纵径 Fruit longitudinal diameter (mm) | 0.374 | 2.091 | 5.590 | 0.000 | 0.4447 | 0.1428 | 24.31 |
果实横径 Fruit diameter (mm) | 0.770 | 3.012 | 3.914 | 0.006 | 0.8587 | 0.2540 | 22.82 |
果柄长 Fruit stalk length (mm) | 2.534 | 1.831 | 0.723 | 0.579 | 2.4755 | 0.2410 | 8.87 |
果柄粗 Fruit stalk thickness (mm) | 0.006 | 0.018 | 3.041 | 0.021 | 0.0065 | 0.0021 | 24.15 |
坐果数 Fruit setting number | 0.615 | 1.294 | 2.104 | 0.087 | 0.6379 | 0.1156 | 15.34 |
果实硬度 Fruit hardness (kg/cm2) | 0.110 | 0.010 | 0.091 | 0.985 | 0.1046 | 0.0008 | 0.73 |
可固性 Soluble solids (%) | 5.589 | 18.268 | 3.269 | 0.015 | 6.0793 | 1.2828 | 17.42 |
果实形状 Fruit shape | 0.799 | 0.62 | 0.776 | 0.544 | 0.7826 | 0.0464 | 5.60 |
果皮颜色 Peel color | 0.785 | 1.904 | 2.425 | 0.054 | 0.8253 | 0.1241 | 13.07 |
果肉颜色 Flesh color | 0.388 | 0.713 | 1.835 | 0.129 | 0.3984 | 0.0486 | 10.88 |
果实风味 Fruit flavor | 1.266 | 1.261 | 0.997 | 0.414 | 1.2517 | 0.0884 | 6.60 |
叶厚 Leaf thickness (mm) | 0.002 | 0.003 | 1.265 | 0.290 | 0.0023 | 0.0005 | 16.85 |
叶面积 Leaf area (cm2) | 10.696 | 23.508 | 2.198 | 0.076 | 11.1369 | 2.9202 | 20.77 |
叶宽 Leaf width (cm) | 0.246 | 0.557 | 2.262 | 0.069 | 0.2570 | 0.0525 | 16.95 |
叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 0.333 | 0.900 | 2.705 | 0.035 | 0.3538 | 0.1353 | 27.67 |
叶形指数 Leaf length/leaf width | 0.004 | 0.004 | 1.102 | 0.361 | 0.0035 | 0.0007 | 17.25 |
叶柄长 Petiole length (mm) | 19.332 | 11.263 | 0.583 | 0.676 | 18.7708 | 0.3819 | 1.99 |
叶柄粗 Petiole thickness (mm) | 0.037 | 0.023 | 0.614 | 0.654 | 0.0360 | 0.0015 | 4.11 |
叶柄指数 Petiole length/petiole thickness | 38.335 | 8.692 | 0.227 | 0.923 | 36.6297 | 0.9423 | 2.51 |
叶片颜色 Leaf color | 0.099 | 0.121 | 1.217 | 0.309 | 0.0990 | 0.0151 | 13.23 |
叶基形态 Leaf base morphology | 0.405 | 1.033 | 2.552 | 0.045 | 0.4276 | 0.1204 | 21.97 |
叶缘形态 Leaf margin morphology | 0.054 | 0.026 | 0.482 | 0.749 | 0.0518 | 0.0022 | 4.00 |
叶面状态 Status of leaf surface | 0.077 | 0.177 | 2.296 | 0.066 | 0.0808 | 0.0091 | 10.08 |
托叶形状 Stipule shape | 0.401 | 0.021 | 0.052 | 0.995 | 0.3803 | 0.0006 | 0.16 |
果核数 Stone number | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.823 | 0.514 | 0.0050 | 0.0008 | 13.69 |
鲜核重 Fresh stone weight (g) | 0.001 | 0.002 | 1.947 | 0.110 | 0.0008 | 0.0001 | 10.85 |
果核纵径 Longitudinal diameter of stone (mm) | 0.068 | 0.264 | 3.853 | 0.006 | 0.0762 | 0.0180 | 19.08 |
果核横径 Stone diameter (mm) | 0.069 | 0.334 | 4.840 | 0.001 | 0.0797 | 0.0190 | 19.26 |
花序小花数 Floret number of inflorescence | 9.265 | 43.064 | 4.648 | 0.002 | 10.6336 | 2.2995 | 17.78 |
平均值 Mean value | 164.840 | 210.734 | 2.101 | 0.292 | 165.0436 | 28.5406 | 13.90 |
表3 准噶尔山楂表型性状的方差分析
Table 3 Variance analysis of phenotypic characteristics of Crataegus songorica
性状 Traits | 均方 Mean square | F | Sig | 方差分量 Variance components | 表型分化系数 VST (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
居群内 Within population | 居群间 Among populations | 居群内 Within population | 居群间 Among populations | ||||
一年生枝长 Annual branch length (mm) | 1,851.668 | 1,475.734 | 0.797 | 0.530 | 1,815.1961 | 251.5190 | 12.17 |
一年生枝粗 Annual branch diameter (mm) | 0.388 | 0.630 | 1.624 | 0.176 | 0.3944 | 0.0421 | 9.64 |
新梢长 New branch length (mm) | 3,494.973 | 5,356.658 | 1.533 | 0.200 | 3,537.9271 | 680.9977 | 16.14 |
单果重 Fruit weight (g) | 0.026 | 0.180 | 6.936 | 0.000 | 0.0323 | 0.0157 | 32.67 |
果实纵径 Fruit longitudinal diameter (mm) | 0.374 | 2.091 | 5.590 | 0.000 | 0.4447 | 0.1428 | 24.31 |
果实横径 Fruit diameter (mm) | 0.770 | 3.012 | 3.914 | 0.006 | 0.8587 | 0.2540 | 22.82 |
果柄长 Fruit stalk length (mm) | 2.534 | 1.831 | 0.723 | 0.579 | 2.4755 | 0.2410 | 8.87 |
果柄粗 Fruit stalk thickness (mm) | 0.006 | 0.018 | 3.041 | 0.021 | 0.0065 | 0.0021 | 24.15 |
坐果数 Fruit setting number | 0.615 | 1.294 | 2.104 | 0.087 | 0.6379 | 0.1156 | 15.34 |
果实硬度 Fruit hardness (kg/cm2) | 0.110 | 0.010 | 0.091 | 0.985 | 0.1046 | 0.0008 | 0.73 |
可固性 Soluble solids (%) | 5.589 | 18.268 | 3.269 | 0.015 | 6.0793 | 1.2828 | 17.42 |
果实形状 Fruit shape | 0.799 | 0.62 | 0.776 | 0.544 | 0.7826 | 0.0464 | 5.60 |
果皮颜色 Peel color | 0.785 | 1.904 | 2.425 | 0.054 | 0.8253 | 0.1241 | 13.07 |
果肉颜色 Flesh color | 0.388 | 0.713 | 1.835 | 0.129 | 0.3984 | 0.0486 | 10.88 |
果实风味 Fruit flavor | 1.266 | 1.261 | 0.997 | 0.414 | 1.2517 | 0.0884 | 6.60 |
叶厚 Leaf thickness (mm) | 0.002 | 0.003 | 1.265 | 0.290 | 0.0023 | 0.0005 | 16.85 |
叶面积 Leaf area (cm2) | 10.696 | 23.508 | 2.198 | 0.076 | 11.1369 | 2.9202 | 20.77 |
叶宽 Leaf width (cm) | 0.246 | 0.557 | 2.262 | 0.069 | 0.2570 | 0.0525 | 16.95 |
叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 0.333 | 0.900 | 2.705 | 0.035 | 0.3538 | 0.1353 | 27.67 |
叶形指数 Leaf length/leaf width | 0.004 | 0.004 | 1.102 | 0.361 | 0.0035 | 0.0007 | 17.25 |
叶柄长 Petiole length (mm) | 19.332 | 11.263 | 0.583 | 0.676 | 18.7708 | 0.3819 | 1.99 |
叶柄粗 Petiole thickness (mm) | 0.037 | 0.023 | 0.614 | 0.654 | 0.0360 | 0.0015 | 4.11 |
叶柄指数 Petiole length/petiole thickness | 38.335 | 8.692 | 0.227 | 0.923 | 36.6297 | 0.9423 | 2.51 |
叶片颜色 Leaf color | 0.099 | 0.121 | 1.217 | 0.309 | 0.0990 | 0.0151 | 13.23 |
叶基形态 Leaf base morphology | 0.405 | 1.033 | 2.552 | 0.045 | 0.4276 | 0.1204 | 21.97 |
叶缘形态 Leaf margin morphology | 0.054 | 0.026 | 0.482 | 0.749 | 0.0518 | 0.0022 | 4.00 |
叶面状态 Status of leaf surface | 0.077 | 0.177 | 2.296 | 0.066 | 0.0808 | 0.0091 | 10.08 |
托叶形状 Stipule shape | 0.401 | 0.021 | 0.052 | 0.995 | 0.3803 | 0.0006 | 0.16 |
果核数 Stone number | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.823 | 0.514 | 0.0050 | 0.0008 | 13.69 |
鲜核重 Fresh stone weight (g) | 0.001 | 0.002 | 1.947 | 0.110 | 0.0008 | 0.0001 | 10.85 |
果核纵径 Longitudinal diameter of stone (mm) | 0.068 | 0.264 | 3.853 | 0.006 | 0.0762 | 0.0180 | 19.08 |
果核横径 Stone diameter (mm) | 0.069 | 0.334 | 4.840 | 0.001 | 0.0797 | 0.0190 | 19.26 |
花序小花数 Floret number of inflorescence | 9.265 | 43.064 | 4.648 | 0.002 | 10.6336 | 2.2995 | 17.78 |
平均值 Mean value | 164.840 | 210.734 | 2.101 | 0.292 | 165.0436 | 28.5406 | 13.90 |
引物名称 Primers | 正向引物 Forward primer (5′-3′) | 反向引物 Reverse primer (5′-3′) | 退火温度TM (℃) | 扩增总带数 Ampl-ified total bands | 多态性条带数 Polym- orphic bands | 多态性位点比率 Percentage of polymo- rphism bands (%) | 多态性信息量Polymorphim information content (PIC) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNDMa1 | CACGGTCATGAACTCCAT | TGGCAGATGGCTTAACTG | 46 | 10 | 10 | 100.00 | 0.82 |
XNDMa4 | GCCTTCACTGTCTGAGAG | CGGATGCTCCTGTTACAC | 55 | 19 | 18 | 94.74 | 0.91 |
XNDMa7 | CGTGTTCATTGTGTCCTTC | TTGCCTTCTCAAGACCATC | 61 | 14 | 11 | 78.57 | 0.9 |
XNDMa10 | CACTTCAGAGCCGCATTA | GAACAACCACGACCTTCT | 58 | 12 | 8 | 66.67 | 0.91 |
XNDMa11 | CTTCAGAGCCGCATTAGG | GAACAACCACGACCTTCT | 59 | 18 | 12 | 66.67 | 0.93 |
XNDMa14 | GCCGAACTACCGTTACCT | GCCGAAGTTGTAGATGTCC | 60 | 17 | 14 | 82.35 | 0.92 |
XNDMa15 | CTGACGACGACGATGAAG | CTGACGACGACGATGAAG | 52 | 23 | 21 | 91.30 | 0.94 |
XNDPy03 | CCCTCCCTCTTTCTCTTCT | AGTTGGACATTGCGATGG | 47 | 16 | 14 | 88.00 | 0.92 |
XNDPy07 | CGATACAACAGAGAATTGAGTC | AAGAACCAGATGGCACAC | 46 | 16 | 16 | 100 | 0.91 |
XNDPy09 | CTTACCTAACAGGACTCAATG | GAGGATGGCAGCAATCTT | 48 | 10 | 9 | 90.00 | 0.86 |
XNDPy11 | AACAGGAAGAGGAGATGGT | CAATGAAAGCGGGAAACTG | 47 | 18 | 17 | 94.44 | 0.92 |
XNDPy13 | CGAAGTTTACATAGGGTTCTCT | TGGGACACTCCAGCATGA | 54 | 17 | 16 | 94.11 | 0.9 |
XNDPy14 | CGCTCACTCCTCAGAAGT | TCGCCTCGTCCATTTGTA | 55 | 7 | 5 | 71.43 | 0.91 |
XNDPy15 | AAAGTAAAGGCGGCAAATG | TCTAGGGTGCGTTTGTTG | 47 | 12 | 12 | 100.00 | 0.9 |
XNDPy16 | CTTCAAGTAGCCAACTATCAG | TGTTTCTGCAAACTGGTCTA | 52 | 11 | 10 | 90.91 | 0.88 |
XNDPy37 | CGGGTGTTGATTCTCTCT | GGTTGGACGAAGTTGATC | 52 | 13 | 13 | 100.00 | 0.88 |
XNDPy38 | GCAGCAGGAAACACAGAA | TTGGCGGTCATTGATAGTAA | 57 | 24 | 23 | 95.83 | 0.92 |
XNDPy40 | CCCTTCCTCAACTAACAGT | GGATAAGCGGTTCTGTAGA | 60 | 14 | 14 | 100.00 | 0.89 |
ZFRIt066 | TGGCTTTAAACGGTTATGCTG | TGAGGAGGGAGGGAATACAA | 46 | 17 | 17 | 100.00 | 0.93 |
ZFRIt067 | GCAAGACCCTTATGCCAACT | TGAGGCCTAACTGCTTCGAC | 62 | 15 | 15 | 100.00 | 0.9 |
ZFRIt084 | GCTGTTGAGCTAGGCAGGTT | CCCGAGTCCTCACCAAGTAA | 62 | 13 | 12 | 92.31 | 0.9 |
ZFRIt097 | ACTGTTTCCAGCAGGCTTGT | GAAGATTGCCCCACAGAAAA | 51 | 14 | 14 | 100.00 | 0.9 |
PES05 | ATGGTGGGTTGGCAGAG | GGTTGGAGCAGATGGT | 48 | 15 | 12 | 80.00 | 0.92 |
PES06 | CCCCAGAAACCCTAACC | AAGAGCGATGACACCACC | 51 | 22 | 19 | 86.36 | 0.94 |
BPPCT028 | TCAAGTTAGCTGAGGATCGC | GAGCTTGCCTATGAGAAGACC | 54 | 19 | 17 | 89.47 | 0.92 |
CH02h11a | CGTGGCATGCCTATCATTTG | CTGTTTGAACCGCTTCCTTC | 56 | 19 | 17 | 89.47 | 0.93 |
CH02b10 | CAAGGAAATCATCAAAGATTCAAG | CAAGTGGCTTCGGATAGTTG | 53 | 20 | 20 | 100.00 | 0.92 |
CH05d03 | TACCTGAAAGAGGAAGCCCT | TCATTCCTTCTCACATCCACT | 59 | 14 | 10 | 71.43 | 0.91 |
CH05e06 | ACACGCACAGAGACAGAGACAT | GTTGAATAGCATCCCAAATGGT | 50 | 18 | 17 | 94.44 | 0.92 |
HI02c07 | AGAGCTACGGGGATCCAAAT | GTTTAAGCATCCCGATTGAAA | 54 | 20 | 18 | 90.00 | 0.92 |
MS14h03 | CGCTCACCTCGTAGACGT | ATGCAATGGCTAAGCATA | 48 | 15 | 13 | 86.67 | 0.89 |
CH03a09 | GCCAGGTGTGACTCCTTCTC | CTGCAGCTGCTGAAACTGG | 50 | 31 | 28 | 90.32 | 0.95 |
CH02a04 | GAAACAGGCGCCATTATTTG | AAAGGAGACGTTGCAAGTGG | 58 | 15 | 12 | 80.00 | 0.9 |
CH01f03b | GAGAAGCAAATGCAAAACCC | CCCGGCTCCTATTCTAC | 52 | 31 | 29 | 93.55 | 0.94 |
CH02a08 | GAGGAGCTGAAGCAGCAGAG | ATGCCAACAAAAGCATAGCC | 60 | 14 | 12 | 85.71 | 0.91 |
CH05a04 | GAAGCGAATTTTGCACGAAT | GCTTTTGTTTCATTGAATCCCC | 58 | 14 | 14 | 100.00 | 0.92 |
CH01h01 | GAAAGACTTGCAGTGGGAGC | GGAGTGGGTTTGAGAAGGTT | 59 | 22 | 21 | 95.45 | 0.93 |
CN851079 | ACCGCCACAACCACAATC | CTCGGGCAAGCGAAGAAT | 56 | 23 | 21 | 91.30 | 0.91 |
CN848770 | CTTATTCCTCCACTCCGATTC | AAACAGCCAAACCCAGCA | 54 | 15 | 14 | 93.33 | 0.87 |
CN581002 | TGGAGGGAAAGGAGAAGC | AAGTGGCAGGCAGCAGTA | 49 | 26 | 25 | 96.15 | 0.95 |
CV986977 | CTCAAACCCAAACCCTCC | TCTCCTGACCCACGAAAA | 55 | 22 | 21 | 95.45 | 0.89 |
CV882996 | CTTCTCCACTAACGCACCA | CCATTCTCAACCAGCACC | 53 | 20 | 18 | 90.00 | 0.92 |
CV794040 | CGTGGTTCCTGGTTGTGA | AAAGCAGTTGCCTCCCTC | 50 | 14 | 14 | 100.00 | 0.87 |
合计 Total | 739 | 673 | |||||
平均 Mean | 17.19 | 15.65 | 90.60 | 0.91 |
表4 SSR引物序列及其扩增结果
Table 4 Sequences of SSR primers and amplification results
引物名称 Primers | 正向引物 Forward primer (5′-3′) | 反向引物 Reverse primer (5′-3′) | 退火温度TM (℃) | 扩增总带数 Ampl-ified total bands | 多态性条带数 Polym- orphic bands | 多态性位点比率 Percentage of polymo- rphism bands (%) | 多态性信息量Polymorphim information content (PIC) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNDMa1 | CACGGTCATGAACTCCAT | TGGCAGATGGCTTAACTG | 46 | 10 | 10 | 100.00 | 0.82 |
XNDMa4 | GCCTTCACTGTCTGAGAG | CGGATGCTCCTGTTACAC | 55 | 19 | 18 | 94.74 | 0.91 |
XNDMa7 | CGTGTTCATTGTGTCCTTC | TTGCCTTCTCAAGACCATC | 61 | 14 | 11 | 78.57 | 0.9 |
XNDMa10 | CACTTCAGAGCCGCATTA | GAACAACCACGACCTTCT | 58 | 12 | 8 | 66.67 | 0.91 |
XNDMa11 | CTTCAGAGCCGCATTAGG | GAACAACCACGACCTTCT | 59 | 18 | 12 | 66.67 | 0.93 |
XNDMa14 | GCCGAACTACCGTTACCT | GCCGAAGTTGTAGATGTCC | 60 | 17 | 14 | 82.35 | 0.92 |
XNDMa15 | CTGACGACGACGATGAAG | CTGACGACGACGATGAAG | 52 | 23 | 21 | 91.30 | 0.94 |
XNDPy03 | CCCTCCCTCTTTCTCTTCT | AGTTGGACATTGCGATGG | 47 | 16 | 14 | 88.00 | 0.92 |
XNDPy07 | CGATACAACAGAGAATTGAGTC | AAGAACCAGATGGCACAC | 46 | 16 | 16 | 100 | 0.91 |
XNDPy09 | CTTACCTAACAGGACTCAATG | GAGGATGGCAGCAATCTT | 48 | 10 | 9 | 90.00 | 0.86 |
XNDPy11 | AACAGGAAGAGGAGATGGT | CAATGAAAGCGGGAAACTG | 47 | 18 | 17 | 94.44 | 0.92 |
XNDPy13 | CGAAGTTTACATAGGGTTCTCT | TGGGACACTCCAGCATGA | 54 | 17 | 16 | 94.11 | 0.9 |
XNDPy14 | CGCTCACTCCTCAGAAGT | TCGCCTCGTCCATTTGTA | 55 | 7 | 5 | 71.43 | 0.91 |
XNDPy15 | AAAGTAAAGGCGGCAAATG | TCTAGGGTGCGTTTGTTG | 47 | 12 | 12 | 100.00 | 0.9 |
XNDPy16 | CTTCAAGTAGCCAACTATCAG | TGTTTCTGCAAACTGGTCTA | 52 | 11 | 10 | 90.91 | 0.88 |
XNDPy37 | CGGGTGTTGATTCTCTCT | GGTTGGACGAAGTTGATC | 52 | 13 | 13 | 100.00 | 0.88 |
XNDPy38 | GCAGCAGGAAACACAGAA | TTGGCGGTCATTGATAGTAA | 57 | 24 | 23 | 95.83 | 0.92 |
XNDPy40 | CCCTTCCTCAACTAACAGT | GGATAAGCGGTTCTGTAGA | 60 | 14 | 14 | 100.00 | 0.89 |
ZFRIt066 | TGGCTTTAAACGGTTATGCTG | TGAGGAGGGAGGGAATACAA | 46 | 17 | 17 | 100.00 | 0.93 |
ZFRIt067 | GCAAGACCCTTATGCCAACT | TGAGGCCTAACTGCTTCGAC | 62 | 15 | 15 | 100.00 | 0.9 |
ZFRIt084 | GCTGTTGAGCTAGGCAGGTT | CCCGAGTCCTCACCAAGTAA | 62 | 13 | 12 | 92.31 | 0.9 |
ZFRIt097 | ACTGTTTCCAGCAGGCTTGT | GAAGATTGCCCCACAGAAAA | 51 | 14 | 14 | 100.00 | 0.9 |
PES05 | ATGGTGGGTTGGCAGAG | GGTTGGAGCAGATGGT | 48 | 15 | 12 | 80.00 | 0.92 |
PES06 | CCCCAGAAACCCTAACC | AAGAGCGATGACACCACC | 51 | 22 | 19 | 86.36 | 0.94 |
BPPCT028 | TCAAGTTAGCTGAGGATCGC | GAGCTTGCCTATGAGAAGACC | 54 | 19 | 17 | 89.47 | 0.92 |
CH02h11a | CGTGGCATGCCTATCATTTG | CTGTTTGAACCGCTTCCTTC | 56 | 19 | 17 | 89.47 | 0.93 |
CH02b10 | CAAGGAAATCATCAAAGATTCAAG | CAAGTGGCTTCGGATAGTTG | 53 | 20 | 20 | 100.00 | 0.92 |
CH05d03 | TACCTGAAAGAGGAAGCCCT | TCATTCCTTCTCACATCCACT | 59 | 14 | 10 | 71.43 | 0.91 |
CH05e06 | ACACGCACAGAGACAGAGACAT | GTTGAATAGCATCCCAAATGGT | 50 | 18 | 17 | 94.44 | 0.92 |
HI02c07 | AGAGCTACGGGGATCCAAAT | GTTTAAGCATCCCGATTGAAA | 54 | 20 | 18 | 90.00 | 0.92 |
MS14h03 | CGCTCACCTCGTAGACGT | ATGCAATGGCTAAGCATA | 48 | 15 | 13 | 86.67 | 0.89 |
CH03a09 | GCCAGGTGTGACTCCTTCTC | CTGCAGCTGCTGAAACTGG | 50 | 31 | 28 | 90.32 | 0.95 |
CH02a04 | GAAACAGGCGCCATTATTTG | AAAGGAGACGTTGCAAGTGG | 58 | 15 | 12 | 80.00 | 0.9 |
CH01f03b | GAGAAGCAAATGCAAAACCC | CCCGGCTCCTATTCTAC | 52 | 31 | 29 | 93.55 | 0.94 |
CH02a08 | GAGGAGCTGAAGCAGCAGAG | ATGCCAACAAAAGCATAGCC | 60 | 14 | 12 | 85.71 | 0.91 |
CH05a04 | GAAGCGAATTTTGCACGAAT | GCTTTTGTTTCATTGAATCCCC | 58 | 14 | 14 | 100.00 | 0.92 |
CH01h01 | GAAAGACTTGCAGTGGGAGC | GGAGTGGGTTTGAGAAGGTT | 59 | 22 | 21 | 95.45 | 0.93 |
CN851079 | ACCGCCACAACCACAATC | CTCGGGCAAGCGAAGAAT | 56 | 23 | 21 | 91.30 | 0.91 |
CN848770 | CTTATTCCTCCACTCCGATTC | AAACAGCCAAACCCAGCA | 54 | 15 | 14 | 93.33 | 0.87 |
CN581002 | TGGAGGGAAAGGAGAAGC | AAGTGGCAGGCAGCAGTA | 49 | 26 | 25 | 96.15 | 0.95 |
CV986977 | CTCAAACCCAAACCCTCC | TCTCCTGACCCACGAAAA | 55 | 22 | 21 | 95.45 | 0.89 |
CV882996 | CTTCTCCACTAACGCACCA | CCATTCTCAACCAGCACC | 53 | 20 | 18 | 90.00 | 0.92 |
CV794040 | CGTGGTTCCTGGTTGTGA | AAAGCAGTTGCCTCCCTC | 50 | 14 | 14 | 100.00 | 0.87 |
合计 Total | 739 | 673 | |||||
平均 Mean | 17.19 | 15.65 | 90.60 | 0.91 |
居群 Population | 多态性位点数 Polymorphism locus number | 多态性位点比率 Percentage of polymorphism loci (%) | 观测等位基因 Observed number of alleles (Na) | 有效等位基因(Ne) Effective number of alleles | Nei’s基因多样性指数 Nei’s gene diversity index (H) | Shannon多样性指数 Shannon’s diversity index (I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pop1 | 257 | 34.78 | 1.3837±0.4756 | 1.2386±0.3538 | 0.1375±0.1895 | 0.2050±0.2720 |
Pop2 | 660 | 89.31 | 1.9025±0.2938 | 1.4342±0.3325 | 0.2635±0.1722 | 0.4035±0.2350 |
Pop3 | 427 | 57.78 | 1.6061±0.4824 | 1.3285±0.3655 | 0.1938±0.1960 | 0.2928±0.2786 |
Pop4 | 327 | 44.25 | 1.4766±0.4908 | 1.2883±0.3738 | 0.1658±0.1996 | 0.2473±0.2841 |
Pop5 | 99 | 13.40 | 1.1372±0.3444 | 1.0971±0.2435 | 0.0569±0.1427 | 0.0830±0.2082 |
平均 Mean | 354 | 47.90 | 1.5012±0.4174 | 1.2773±0.3338 | 0.1635±0.1780 | 0.2463±0.2556 |
物种水平 Species level | 669 | 90.53 | 1.9136±0.2781 | 1.3843±0.3302 | 0.2377±0.1695 | 0.3712±0.2301 |
表5 准噶尔山楂居群的遗传多样性
Table 5 Genetic diversity of populations of Crataegus songorica
居群 Population | 多态性位点数 Polymorphism locus number | 多态性位点比率 Percentage of polymorphism loci (%) | 观测等位基因 Observed number of alleles (Na) | 有效等位基因(Ne) Effective number of alleles | Nei’s基因多样性指数 Nei’s gene diversity index (H) | Shannon多样性指数 Shannon’s diversity index (I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pop1 | 257 | 34.78 | 1.3837±0.4756 | 1.2386±0.3538 | 0.1375±0.1895 | 0.2050±0.2720 |
Pop2 | 660 | 89.31 | 1.9025±0.2938 | 1.4342±0.3325 | 0.2635±0.1722 | 0.4035±0.2350 |
Pop3 | 427 | 57.78 | 1.6061±0.4824 | 1.3285±0.3655 | 0.1938±0.1960 | 0.2928±0.2786 |
Pop4 | 327 | 44.25 | 1.4766±0.4908 | 1.2883±0.3738 | 0.1658±0.1996 | 0.2473±0.2841 |
Pop5 | 99 | 13.40 | 1.1372±0.3444 | 1.0971±0.2435 | 0.0569±0.1427 | 0.0830±0.2082 |
平均 Mean | 354 | 47.90 | 1.5012±0.4174 | 1.2773±0.3338 | 0.1635±0.1780 | 0.2463±0.2556 |
物种水平 Species level | 669 | 90.53 | 1.9136±0.2781 | 1.3843±0.3302 | 0.2377±0.1695 | 0.3712±0.2301 |
总居群基因多样度 Total gene diversity index (Ht) | 居群内基因多样度 Gene diversity within population (Hs) | 遗传分化系数 Index of genetic differentiation (Gst) | 基因流 Gene flow (Nm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
平均 Average | 0.2023 | 0.1635 | 0.1916 | 2.1116 |
标准差 Standard deviation | 0.0293 | 0.0182 |
表6 准噶尔山楂居群内和居群间基因的Gst分析
Table 6 The Gst analysis of genetic differentiation among Crataegus songorica populations
总居群基因多样度 Total gene diversity index (Ht) | 居群内基因多样度 Gene diversity within population (Hs) | 遗传分化系数 Index of genetic differentiation (Gst) | 基因流 Gene flow (Nm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
平均 Average | 0.2023 | 0.1635 | 0.1916 | 2.1116 |
标准差 Standard deviation | 0.0293 | 0.0182 |
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 df | 平方和 Sum of square | 均方 Mean square | 方差分量 Variance component | 方差分量百分率 Percentage of variance component | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
居群间 Among populations | 4 | 0.3890 | 0.0972 | 0.0185 | 20.37% | <0.001 |
居群内 Within population | 91 | 6.7171 | 0.0772 | 0.0723 | 79.63% | <0.001 |
表7 居群间和居群内分子变异的方差分析
Table 7 Analysis of molecular variance(AMOVA) within and among populations
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 df | 平方和 Sum of square | 均方 Mean square | 方差分量 Variance component | 方差分量百分率 Percentage of variance component | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
居群间 Among populations | 4 | 0.3890 | 0.0972 | 0.0185 | 20.37% | <0.001 |
居群内 Within population | 91 | 6.7171 | 0.0772 | 0.0723 | 79.63% | <0.001 |
居群1 Pop1 | 居群2 Pop2 | 居群3 Pop3 | 居群4 Pop4 | 居群5 Pop5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
居群1 Pop1 | **** | 0.9641 | 0.9595 | 0.9510 | 0.8900 |
居群2 Pop2 | 0.0366 | **** | 0.9792 | 0.9678 | 0.9057 |
居群3 Pop3 | 0.0414 | 0.0211 | **** | 0.9760 | 0.9315 |
居群4 Pop4 | 0.0503 | 0.0327 | 0.0243 | **** | 0.9247 |
居群5 Pop5 | 0.1171 | 0.0993 | 0.0711 | 0.0785 | **** |
表8 准噶尔山楂5个居群间的遗传一致度(对角线上)与遗传距离(对角线下)
Table 8 Nei’s genetic identity (above the diagonal) and genetic distance (below the diagonal) among five populations of Crataegus songorica
居群1 Pop1 | 居群2 Pop2 | 居群3 Pop3 | 居群4 Pop4 | 居群5 Pop5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
居群1 Pop1 | **** | 0.9641 | 0.9595 | 0.9510 | 0.8900 |
居群2 Pop2 | 0.0366 | **** | 0.9792 | 0.9678 | 0.9057 |
居群3 Pop3 | 0.0414 | 0.0211 | **** | 0.9760 | 0.9315 |
居群4 Pop4 | 0.0503 | 0.0327 | 0.0243 | **** | 0.9247 |
居群5 Pop5 | 0.1171 | 0.0993 | 0.0711 | 0.0785 | **** |
图3 92份准噶尔山楂资源SSR标记的主坐标分析图。(a)平面散点图; (b)三维空间图。
Fig. 3 Principal coordinate analysis for 92 Crataegus songorica resources. (a) Planar graph; (b) Three-dimensional graph.
[1] | An MM, Wang YT, Song Y, Ji XH, Liu C, Wang N, Wu YS, Liu W, Cao YF, Feng SQ, Chen XS (2014) Genetic diversity of fruit phenotypic traits of wild Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 47, 3034-3043. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[安萌萌, 王艳廷, 宋杨, 冀晓昊, 刘畅, 王楠, 吴玉森, 刘文, 曹玉芬, 冯守千, 陈学森 (2014) 野生秋子梨(Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim)果实性状的遗传多样性. 中国农业科学, 47, 3034-3043.] | |
[2] | Bao WQ, Wuyun TN, Wang L, Zhao H, Du HY (2016) Genetic diversity and population structure of wild apricot in Xinjiang revealed by SSR markers. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 36, 1757-1763. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[包文泉, 乌云塔娜, 王琳, 赵罕, 杜红岩 (2016) 基于SSR标记的新疆野杏群体遗传多样性及遗传结构. 西北植物学报, 36, 1757-1763.] | |
[3] | Campbell DR (2009) Using phenotypic manipulations to study multivariate selection of floral trait associations. Annals of Botany, 103, 1557-1566. |
[4] | Cao Q, Liao K, Liu J, Xu GX, Sun Q, Si HZ, Yang XF (2016) Study on the Daxigou wild apricot fruit phenotypic diversity in Huocheng County, Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 53, 791-798. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[曹倩, 廖康, 刘娟, 徐桂香, 孙琪, 司洪章, 杨新峰 (2016) 新疆霍城县大西沟野杏果实表型多样性研究. 新疆农业科学, 53, 791-798.] | |
[5] | Dong Y, Zhang J, Ren YC, Han ZX (2013) Study on genetic diversity of natural population in Malus sieversii with microsatellite. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 14, 771-777. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[董研, 张军, 任亚超, 韩志校 (2013) 中国新疆野苹果天然群体遗传多样性SSR分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 14, 771-777.] | |
[6] | Ge S, Wang MX, Chen YW (1988) An analysis of population genetic structure of masson pine by isozyme technique. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 24, 399-409. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[葛颂, 王明庥, 陈岳武 (1988) 用同工酶研究马尾松群体的遗传结构. 林业科学, 24, 399-409.] | |
[7] | Geng WJ, Liao K, Diao YQ, Xu Z, Sha H (2012) Analysis of genetic relationships among different populations of Prunus domestica L. based on SSR marker. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 39(Suppl.), 2602. (in Chinese) |
[耿文娟, 廖康, 刁永强, 许正, 沙红 (2012) 野生欧洲李不同居群亲缘关系的SSR分析. 园艺学报, 39(增刊), 2602.] | |
[8] | Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Alia R, Gil L (2002) Population genetic structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): a comparison of allozyme markers and quantitative traits. Heredity, 89, 199-206. |
[9] | Gu QH, Xiong BX, Chen J, Huang J, Zhu YT (2011) Application of microsatellite DNA markers in population genetics studies of freshwater gastropoda. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 17, 280-286. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[顾钱洪, 熊邦喜, 陈洁, 黄瑾, 朱玉婷 (2011) 微卫星标记技术在淡水腹足类种群遗传学研究中的应用. 应用与环境生物学报, 17, 280-286.] | |
[10] | Han ZX, Bi ZL, Lu FQ, Gao P, Zhang PF, Li JH, Zhang J (2014) Analysis of the relative relationship of different hawthorn cultivars by apple SSR primers. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research, 29, 165-168. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[韩志校, 毕振良, 陆凤勤, 高朋, 张朋飞, 李舰航, 张军 (2014) 利用苹果引物对不同山楂品种的SSR分析. 河北林果研究, 29, 165-168.] | |
[11] | He TM (2006) Study on Genetic Diversity of Chinese Common Apricot (Prunus armeniaca) Germplasm and Origin of Purple Apricot (Prunus dasycarpa). PhD dissertation, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[何天明 (2006) 中国普通杏(Prunus armeniaca)种质资源遗传多样性及紫杏(P. dasycarpa)起源研究. 博士学位论文, 山东农业大学, 山东泰安.] | |
[12] | Hu BL, Wan Y, Li X, Lei JG, Luo XD, Yan WG, Xie JK (2012) Analysis on genetic diversity of phenotypic traits in rice (Oryza sativa) core collection and its comprehensive assessment. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 38, 829-839. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[胡标林, 万勇, 李霞, 雷建国, 罗向东, 严文贵, 谢建坤 (2012) 水稻核心种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 作物学报, 38, 829-839.] | |
[13] | Huang CQ, Liu GD, Bai CJ, Wang WQ, Tang J, Yu DG (2012) A study on the morphological diversity of 475 accessions of Cynodon dactylon. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 21(4), 33-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[黄春琼, 刘国道, 白昌军, 王文强, 唐军, 虞道耿 (2012) 475份狗牙根种质资源形态多样性的研究. 草业学报, 21(4), 33-42.] | |
[14] | Liu CQ, Chen XS, Wang JZ, Chen XL, Wang HB, Tian CP, Wu CJ (2008) Studies on genetic diversity of phenotypic traits in wild myrobalan plum (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.). Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 35, 1261-1268. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘崇琪, 陈学森, 王金政, 陈晓流, 王海波, 田长平, 吴传金 (2008) 新疆野生樱桃李果实部分表型性状的遗传多样性分析. 园艺学报, 35, 1261-1268.] | |
[15] | Liu H, Liao K, Liu J, Zhao SR, Sun Q, Cao Q (2016) Analysis of genetic diversity and genetic relationship of wild hawthorn resources in Xinjiang by ISSR markers. Nonwood Forest Research, 34(2), 19-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘欢, 廖康, 刘娟, 赵世荣, 孙琪, 曹倩 (2016) 新疆野生山楂资源遗传多样性及亲缘关系的ISSR分析. 经济林研究, 34(2), 19-23.] | |
[16] | Liu H, Liao K, Sun Q, Cao Q, Peng XL, Yang XF, Si HZ (2015) A study on flower bud morphological differentiation of wild hawthorn in Xinjiang. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 38, 36-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘欢, 廖康, 孙琪, 曹倩, 彭晓莉, 杨新峰, 司洪章 (2015) 新疆野山楂花芽形态分化的研究. 新疆农业大学学报, 38, 36-39.] | |
[17] | Liu H, Liao K, Sun Q, Yang XF, Si HZ, Cao Q (2014) Research on morphlogical characteristics of flower organ of wild hawthorn in Xinjiang. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 37, 293-297. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘欢, 廖康, 孙琪, 杨新峰, 司洪章, 曹倩 (2014) 新疆3种野生山楂花器官形态特征研究. 新疆农业大学学报, 37, 293-297.] | |
[18] | Lü DG, Li ZX (2006) Description Criterion and Data Standard for Hawthorn Germplasm Evaluation. China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[吕德国, 李作轩 (2006)山楂种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 中国农业出版社, 北京.] | |
[19] | Lü HY, Zhou LL, Li J, Zhang J (2011) The studies on extracting technology of pigments from Crataegus songorica. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 17(9), 25-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[吕海英, 周露露, 李进, 张瑾 (2011) 准噶尔山楂果实色素提取工艺研究. 安徽农学通报, 17(9), 25-27.] | |
[20] | Meeus S, Honnay O, Jacquemyn H (2012) Strong differences in genetic structure across disjunct, edge, and core populations of the distylous forest herb Pulmonaria officinalis (Boraginaceae). American Journal of Botany, 99, 1809-1818. |
[21] | Opedal H, Falahati-Anbaran M, Albertsen E, Armbruster WS, Perez-Barrales R, Stenien HK, Pelabon C (2017) Euglossine bees mediate only limited long-distance gene flow in a tropical vine. New Phytologist, 213, 1898-1908. |
[22] | Ramos R, Song G, Navarro J, Zhang R, Symes CT, Forero MG, Lei F (2016) Population genetic structure and long-distance dispersal of a recently expanding migratory bird. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 99, 194-203. |
[23] | Wang K, Liu FZ, Zhao JC, Gong X, Gao Y, Liu LJ (2008) Study on partial phenotypic diversity of apple germplasm resources. China Fruits, (5), 20-25. (in Chinese) |
[王昆, 刘凤之, 赵进春, 龚欣, 高源, 刘立军 (2008) 苹果种质资源部分表型多样性研究. 中国果树, (5), 20-25.] | |
[24] | Wang ZY, Dong YZ, Chen H, Wang RF (2011) Rapid DNA extraction method from Xinjiang Yili wild walnut for SSR-PCR. Northern Horticulture, (19), 100-103. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王肇延, 董玉芝, 陈虹, 王瑞芬 (2011) 适用于新疆野核桃SSR-PCR的快速提取DNA的方法. 北方园艺, (19), 100-103.] | |
[25] | Yin LK (2006) Rare and Endangered Endemic Higher Plants in Xinjiang of China. Xinjiang Science and Technology Publishing House, Urumqi. (in Chinese) |
[尹林克 (2006)新疆珍稀濒危特有高等植物. 新疆科学技术出版社, 乌鲁木齐.] | |
[26] | Yu WL, Zhang B (2012) A study on morphological variation of pods and seeds of Medicago falcata collected from Zhaosu, Xinjiang. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 21, 249-255. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[于万里, 张博 (2012) 新疆昭苏野生黄花苜蓿果实形态变异研究. 草业学报, 21, 249-255.] | |
[27] | Zhang Y, Dai HY, Zhang QJ, Li H, Zhang ZH (2008) Assessment of genetic relationship in Crataegus genus by the apple SSR primers. Journal of Fruit Science, 25, 521-525. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[张叶, 代红艳, 张琪静, 李贺, 张志宏 (2008) 利用苹果SSR引物分析山楂属植物遗传关系. 果树学报, 25, 521-525.] | |
[28] | Zhao HZ, Feng BT (1996) China Fruit Plant Monograph:Hawthorn (Crataegus) Flora. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[赵焕谆, 丰宝田 (1996) 中国果树志·山楂卷. 中国林业出版社, 北京.] | |
[29] | Zia ZU, Sadaqat HA, Tahir MH, Sadia B, Bushman BS, Hole D, Michaels L, Malik W (2014) Estimation of genetic diversity using SSR markers in sunflower. Genetika, 50, 570-580. |
[1] | 焦振彬, 罗毅波. 群体表型性状研究揭示环境与遗传因素对霍山石斛表型及物种分类的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(8): 1073-1086. |
[2] | 冯秋红, 李登峰, 于涛, 李俊清, 马文宝, 张雷. 极小种群野生植物梓叶槭的种实表型变异特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(3): 314-322. |
[3] | 翁茁先, 黄佳琼, 张仕豪, 余锴纯, 钟福生, 黄勋和, 张彬. 利用线粒体COI基因揭示中国乌骨鸡遗传多样性和群体遗传结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(6): 667-676. |
[4] | 张亚红,贾会霞,王志彬,孙佩,曹德美,胡建军. 滇杨种群遗传多样性与遗传结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(4): 355-365. |
[5] | 赵颖, 马荣, 尹永香, 张志东, 田呈明. 新疆不同来源金黄壳囊孢的多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(10): 1122-1131. |
[6] | 于少帅, 徐启聪, 林彩丽, 王圣洁, 田国忠. 植原体遗传多样性研究现状与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(2): 205-215. |
[7] | 杨洁, 赫佳, 王丹碧, 施恩, 杨文宇, 耿其芳, 王中生. InDel标记的研究和应用进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(2): 237-243. |
[8] | 徐刚标, 梁艳, 蒋燚, 刘雄盛, 胡尚力, 肖玉菲, 郝博搏. 伯乐树种群遗传多样性及遗传结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2013, 21(6): 723-731. |
[9] | 吴雪琴, 徐刚标, 梁艳, 申响保. 南岭地区观光木自然和人工迁地保护种群的遗传多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2013, 21(1): 71-79. |
[10] | 向妮, 肖炎农, 段灿星, 王晓鸣, 朱振东. 利用SSR标记分析茄镰孢豌豆专化型的遗传多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2012, 20(6): 693-702. |
[11] | 马洪峥, 李珊珊, 葛颂, 戴思兰, 陈文俐. 能源作物芒属双药芒组SSR引物的筛选及其评价[J]. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(5): 535-542. |
[12] | 王丽侠, 程须珍, 王素华. 基于SSR标记分析小豆及其近缘植物的遗传关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(1): 17-23. |
[13] | 陈碧云, 胡琼, Christina Dixelius, 李国庆, 伍晓明. 利用SRAP分析核盘菌遗传多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2010, 18(5): 509-515. |
[14] | 李磊, 刘彤, 刘斌, 刘忠权, 司朗明, 张荣. 新疆北部拟南芥自然居群表型变异与协变[J]. 生物多样性, 2010, 18(5): 497-508. |
[15] | 张丽娜, 叶武威, 王俊娟, 樊保香, 王德龙. 棉花耐盐相关种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2010, 18(2): 137-144. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn