生物多样性 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 34-45. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016166
收稿日期:
2016-06-23
接受日期:
2016-10-31
出版日期:
2017-01-20
发布日期:
2017-02-08
通讯作者:
吕光辉
基金资助:
Gong Xuewei1,2, Lü Guanghui1,3,*()
Received:
2016-06-23
Accepted:
2016-10-31
Online:
2017-01-20
Published:
2017-02-08
Contact:
Lü Guanghui
摘要:
多样性格局的形成是物种间相互作用及其适应环境的结果。为了阐释艾比湖流域荒漠植物的物种多样性及优势种生态位特征, 我们对艾比湖湿地国家级自然保护区内阿其克苏河北岸的杜加依林进行了物种组成与环境因子调查。结果表明: (1)按照土壤水盐含量, 根据多元回归树(multivariate regression tree, MRT)方法可将植被划分为胡杨-罗布麻-芦苇(Ass. Populus euphratica - Apocynum venetum - Phragmites australis) (I型)、胡杨-琵琶柴(Ass. Populus euphratica - Reaumuria songonica) (II型)和盐爪爪‖胡杨-罗布麻+骆驼刺(Ass. Kalidium foliatum ‖ Populus euphratica - Apocynum venetum + Alhagi sparsifolia) (III型) 3个主要群丛。(2) I型群丛抵御极端环境的能力较差, 包括5个样方, II型群丛能够忍受轻微的盐旱胁迫, 包括3个样方, III型群丛对盐旱生境具有一定的适应性, 包括22个样方; 随着典型群丛从I型演替成为III型, 沙生和盐生植物逐渐占据生境并成为主要优势种, Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H)和Margalef丰富度指数(Ma)先降低后增加, Simpson优势度指数(C)和Pielou均匀度指数(E)先增加后逐渐降低, 体现了杜加依林植物群落的演替序列。(3)生态位宽度Bray-Curtis相似性聚类分析将13个优势种分为2组, 平均相似性分别为96.89%和97.66%, 反映了研究区物种生态位宽度具有较高的相似性; 基于物种多度数据的非度量多维标度排序(NMDS)压力系数为0.04, 除铃铛刺(Halimodendron halodendron)与甘草(Glycyrrhiza uralensis)外, 物种之间的分布也具有较高的相似性。综上所述, 土壤水盐含量是影响艾比湖流域杜加依林中荒漠植物群丛结构及多样性的主要环境因子, 并决定了群落的演替方向; 各优势种之间的生态位和分布具有较高的相似性, 存在明显的竞争关系。
龚雪伟, 吕光辉 (2017) 艾比湖流域杜加依林荒漠植物群落多样性及优势种生态位. 生物多样性, 25, 34-45. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016166.
Gong Xuewei, Lü Guanghui (2017) Species diversity and dominant species’ niches of eremophyte communities of the Tugai forest in the Ebinur basin of Xinjiang, China. Biodiversity Science, 25, 34-45. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016166.
图1 研究区位置及样方布设。左图为艾比湖湿地国家级自然保护区遥感影像图, 右图为东大桥管护站附近的样方布设。
Fig. 1 Location of the study area and quadrats setting. The picture on the left shows the remote sensing image of Ebinur Lake Wetland National Nature Reserve and the picture on the right shows the scheme of quadrats near Dongdaqiao Management and Protection Station.
图2 群丛分类多元回归树。柱状图代表物种平均重要值, n表示所包含的样方个数。
Fig. 2 Multivariate regression tree for associations classification. The columns represent the importance values of the species and n refers to the amount of quadrats included.
图3 不同群丛的物种多样性。I为胡杨-罗布麻-芦苇群丛, II为胡杨-琵琶柴群丛, III为盐爪爪‖胡杨-罗布麻+骆驼刺群丛。
Fig. 3 Species diversity of different associations. Association I: Ass. Populus euphratica - Apocynum venetum - Phragmites australis, Association II: Ass. Populus euphratica - Reaumuria songonica, and Association III: Ass. Kalidium foliatum ‖ Populus euphratica - Apocynum venetum + Alhagi sparsifolia.
土壤因子 Soil factors | 资源梯度等级 Resource gradient grade | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
含水量 Water content (%) | 2.0-4.0 | 4.0-7.0 | 7.0-10.0 | 110.0-13.0 | 13.0-16.0 | 16.0-19.0 | - | - |
含盐量 Salt content (g/kg) | 0.00-1.00 | 1.00-2.00 | 2.00-3.00 | 3.00-4.00 | 4.00-5.00 | 5.00-6.00 | 6.00-7.00 | 7.00-8.00 |
pH | 8.25-8.34 | 8.34-8.44 | 8.44-8.54 | 8.54-8.64 | 8.64-8.74 | 8.74-8.84 | 8.84-8.94 | 8.94-9.04 |
土壤有机质 Soil organic matter (g/kg) | 0.00-1.00 | 1.00-2.00 | 2.00-3.00 | 3.00-4.00 | 4.00-5.00 | 5.00-6.00 | 6.00-7.00 | 7.00-8.00 |
表1 土壤因子梯度等级划分。相邻等级中相同的值划入低等级。
Table 1 Resource gradients division of soil factors. The same values in adjacent grades are assigned to the lower grade.
土壤因子 Soil factors | 资源梯度等级 Resource gradient grade | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
含水量 Water content (%) | 2.0-4.0 | 4.0-7.0 | 7.0-10.0 | 110.0-13.0 | 13.0-16.0 | 16.0-19.0 | - | - |
含盐量 Salt content (g/kg) | 0.00-1.00 | 1.00-2.00 | 2.00-3.00 | 3.00-4.00 | 4.00-5.00 | 5.00-6.00 | 6.00-7.00 | 7.00-8.00 |
pH | 8.25-8.34 | 8.34-8.44 | 8.44-8.54 | 8.54-8.64 | 8.64-8.74 | 8.74-8.84 | 8.84-8.94 | 8.94-9.04 |
土壤有机质 Soil organic matter (g/kg) | 0.00-1.00 | 1.00-2.00 | 2.00-3.00 | 3.00-4.00 | 4.00-5.00 | 5.00-6.00 | 6.00-7.00 | 7.00-8.00 |
编号 | 优势种 | 水分维度 | 盐分维度 | pH维度 | 土壤有机质维度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Dominnant species | Water dimension | Salt dimension | pH dimension | Soil organic matter dimension |
1 | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 0.536 | 0.455 | 0.414 | 0.437 |
2 | 梭梭 Haloxylon ammodendron | 0.531 | 0.335 | 0.304 | 0.348 |
3 | 柽柳 Tamarix ramosissima | 0.480 | 0.210 | 0.236 | 0.276 |
4 | 琵琶柴 Reaumuria songonica | 0.724 | 0.388 | 0.452 | 0.412 |
5 | 花花柴 Karelinia caspica | 0.354 | 0.317 | 0.377 | 0.251 |
6 | 白刺 Nitraria tangutorum | 0.611 | 0.535 | 0.492 | 0.476 |
7 | 骆驼刺 Alhagi sparsifolia | 0.390 | 0.422 | 0.497 | 0.189 |
8 | 铃铛刺 Halimodendron halodendron | 0.329 | 0.246 | 0.211 | 0.299 |
9 | 罗布麻 Apocynum venetum | 0.898 | 0.383 | 0.433 | 0.536 |
10 | 盐爪爪 Kalidium foliatum | 0.367 | 0.427 | 0.468 | 0.221 |
11 | 盐节木 Halocnemum strobilaceum | 0.186 | 0.245 | 0.325 | 0.234 |
12 | 甘草 Glycyrrhiza uralensis | 0.333 | 0.250 | 0.250 | 0.250 |
13 | 芦苇 Phragmites australis | 0.316 | 0.448 | 0.342 | 0.246 |
表2 优势种生态位宽度
Table 2 Ecological niche breadth of dominant species
编号 | 优势种 | 水分维度 | 盐分维度 | pH维度 | 土壤有机质维度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Dominnant species | Water dimension | Salt dimension | pH dimension | Soil organic matter dimension |
1 | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 0.536 | 0.455 | 0.414 | 0.437 |
2 | 梭梭 Haloxylon ammodendron | 0.531 | 0.335 | 0.304 | 0.348 |
3 | 柽柳 Tamarix ramosissima | 0.480 | 0.210 | 0.236 | 0.276 |
4 | 琵琶柴 Reaumuria songonica | 0.724 | 0.388 | 0.452 | 0.412 |
5 | 花花柴 Karelinia caspica | 0.354 | 0.317 | 0.377 | 0.251 |
6 | 白刺 Nitraria tangutorum | 0.611 | 0.535 | 0.492 | 0.476 |
7 | 骆驼刺 Alhagi sparsifolia | 0.390 | 0.422 | 0.497 | 0.189 |
8 | 铃铛刺 Halimodendron halodendron | 0.329 | 0.246 | 0.211 | 0.299 |
9 | 罗布麻 Apocynum venetum | 0.898 | 0.383 | 0.433 | 0.536 |
10 | 盐爪爪 Kalidium foliatum | 0.367 | 0.427 | 0.468 | 0.221 |
11 | 盐节木 Halocnemum strobilaceum | 0.186 | 0.245 | 0.325 | 0.234 |
12 | 甘草 Glycyrrhiza uralensis | 0.333 | 0.250 | 0.250 | 0.250 |
13 | 芦苇 Phragmites australis | 0.316 | 0.448 | 0.342 | 0.246 |
编号 No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.783 | 0.343 | 0.502 | 0.406 | 0.735 | 0.484 | 0.656 | 0.808 | 0.460 | 0.448 | 0.874 | 0.940 | |
2 | 0.941 | 0.544 | 0.665 | 0.592 | 0.785 | 0.647 | 0.702 | 0.801 | 0.636 | 0.580 | 0.731 | 0.892 | |
3 | 0.684 | 0.805 | 0.922 | 0.882 | 0.851 | 0.887 | 0.792 | 0.722 | 0.810 | 0.793 | 0.245 | 0.602 | |
4 | 0.898 | 0.911 | 0.000 | 0.981 | 0.945 | 0.992 | 0.715 | 0.748 | 0.937 | 0.911 | 0.499 | 0.836 | |
5 | 0.305 | 0.638 | 0.707 | 0.965 | 0.878 | 0.982 | 0.576 | 0.619 | 0.909 | 0.955 | 0.474 | 0.803 | |
6 | 0.962 | 0.597 | 0.815 | 0.800 | 0.953 | 0.929 | 0.828 | 0.891 | 0.884 | 0.819 | 0.645 | 0.935 | |
7 | 0.372 | 0.987 | 0.240 | 0.985 | 0.871 | 0.508 | 0.664 | 0.717 | 0.962 | 0.898 | 0.484 | 0.818 | |
8 | 0.280 | 0.119 | 0.743 | 0.279 | 0.938 | 0.880 | 0.380 | 0.961 | 0.669 | 0.467 | 0.420 | 0.671 | |
9 | 0.456 | 0.742 | 0.597 | 0.636 | 0.763 | 0.466 | 0.670 | 0.000 | 0.738 | 0.526 | 0.61 | 0.838 | |
10 | 0.284 | 0.779 | 0.476 | 0.975 | 0.000 | 0.731 | 0.943 | 0.604 | 0.716 | 0.765 | 0.436 | 0.759 | |
11 | 0.767 | 0.819 | 0.288 | 0.883 | 0.317 | 0.715 | 0.861 | 0.564 | 0.779 | 0.991 | 0.590 | 0.865 | |
12 | 0.728 | 0.420 | 0.693 | 0.878 | 0.732 | 0.798 | 0.902 | 0.569 | 0.751 | 0.805 | 0.693 | 0.968 | |
13 | 0.450 | 0.339 | 0.733 | 0.274 | 0.961 | 0.832 | 0.322 | 0.000 | 0.320 | 0.831 | 0.366 | 0.671 |
表3 优势种生态位水分和总盐维度重叠值
Table 3 Ecological niche overlaps between dominant species on soil water and total salinity dimension
编号 No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.783 | 0.343 | 0.502 | 0.406 | 0.735 | 0.484 | 0.656 | 0.808 | 0.460 | 0.448 | 0.874 | 0.940 | |
2 | 0.941 | 0.544 | 0.665 | 0.592 | 0.785 | 0.647 | 0.702 | 0.801 | 0.636 | 0.580 | 0.731 | 0.892 | |
3 | 0.684 | 0.805 | 0.922 | 0.882 | 0.851 | 0.887 | 0.792 | 0.722 | 0.810 | 0.793 | 0.245 | 0.602 | |
4 | 0.898 | 0.911 | 0.000 | 0.981 | 0.945 | 0.992 | 0.715 | 0.748 | 0.937 | 0.911 | 0.499 | 0.836 | |
5 | 0.305 | 0.638 | 0.707 | 0.965 | 0.878 | 0.982 | 0.576 | 0.619 | 0.909 | 0.955 | 0.474 | 0.803 | |
6 | 0.962 | 0.597 | 0.815 | 0.800 | 0.953 | 0.929 | 0.828 | 0.891 | 0.884 | 0.819 | 0.645 | 0.935 | |
7 | 0.372 | 0.987 | 0.240 | 0.985 | 0.871 | 0.508 | 0.664 | 0.717 | 0.962 | 0.898 | 0.484 | 0.818 | |
8 | 0.280 | 0.119 | 0.743 | 0.279 | 0.938 | 0.880 | 0.380 | 0.961 | 0.669 | 0.467 | 0.420 | 0.671 | |
9 | 0.456 | 0.742 | 0.597 | 0.636 | 0.763 | 0.466 | 0.670 | 0.000 | 0.738 | 0.526 | 0.61 | 0.838 | |
10 | 0.284 | 0.779 | 0.476 | 0.975 | 0.000 | 0.731 | 0.943 | 0.604 | 0.716 | 0.765 | 0.436 | 0.759 | |
11 | 0.767 | 0.819 | 0.288 | 0.883 | 0.317 | 0.715 | 0.861 | 0.564 | 0.779 | 0.991 | 0.590 | 0.865 | |
12 | 0.728 | 0.420 | 0.693 | 0.878 | 0.732 | 0.798 | 0.902 | 0.569 | 0.751 | 0.805 | 0.693 | 0.968 | |
13 | 0.450 | 0.339 | 0.733 | 0.274 | 0.961 | 0.832 | 0.322 | 0.000 | 0.320 | 0.831 | 0.366 | 0.671 |
编号 No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.446 | 0.391 | 0.436 | 0.355 | 0.726 | 0.351 | 0.488 | 0.578 | 0.344 | 0.140 | 0.790 | 0.929 | |
2 | 0.343 | 0.910 | 0.981 | 0.888 | 0.887 | 0.903 | 0.391 | 0.893 | 0.927 | 0.479 | 0.619 | 0.301 | |
3 | 0.487 | 0.975 | 0.921 | 0.991 | 0.799 | 0.913 | 0.061 | 0.804 | 0.939 | 0.512 | 0.648 | 0.314 | |
4 | 0.325 | 0.763 | 0.778 | 0.909 | 0.870 | 0.888 | 0.360 | 0.906 | 0.922 | 0.622 | 0.605 | 0.303 | |
5 | 0.398 | 0.777 | 0.848 | 0.906 | 0.736 | 0.941 | 0.000 | 0.804 | 0.962 | 0.582 | 0.676 | 0.322 | |
6 | 0.375 | 0.647 | 0.691 | 0.879 | 0.857 | 0.684 | 0.535 | 0.816 | 0.716 | 0.301 | 0.639 | 0.518 | |
7 | 0.230 | 0.892 | 0.842 | 0.804 | 0.748 | 0.663 | 0.099 | 0.846 | 0.995 | 0.538 | 0.751 | 0.360 | |
8 | 0.705 | 0.694 | 0.799 | 0.843 | 0.953 | 0.865 | 0.570 | 0.546 | 0.113 | 0.000 | 0.164 | 0.258 | |
9 | 0.357 | 0.919 | 0.949 | 0.861 | 0.909 | 0.852 | 0.889 | 0.846 | 0.857 | 0.548 | 0.724 | 0.487 | |
10 | 0.283 | 0.756 | 0.743 | 0.973 | 0.819 | 0.815 | 0.863 | 0.714 | 0.833 | 0.576 | 0.718 | 0.329 | |
11 | 0.080 | 0.314 | 0.216 | 0.564 | 0.335 | 0.302 | 0.669 | 0.093 | 0.340 | 0.694 | 0.373 | 0.195 | |
12 | 0.522 | 0.928 | 0.980 | 0.835 | 0.921 | 0.780 | 0.792 | 0.902 | 0.959 | 0.768 | 0.679 | 0.878 | |
13 | 0.487 | 0.497 | 0.587 | 0.690 | 0.770 | 0.935 | 0.518 | 0.809 | 0.779 | 0.612 | 0.870 | 0.687 |
表4 优势种生态位pH值和有机质维度重叠值
Table 4 Ecological niche overlaps between dominant species on pH value and organic matter dimension
编号 No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.446 | 0.391 | 0.436 | 0.355 | 0.726 | 0.351 | 0.488 | 0.578 | 0.344 | 0.140 | 0.790 | 0.929 | |
2 | 0.343 | 0.910 | 0.981 | 0.888 | 0.887 | 0.903 | 0.391 | 0.893 | 0.927 | 0.479 | 0.619 | 0.301 | |
3 | 0.487 | 0.975 | 0.921 | 0.991 | 0.799 | 0.913 | 0.061 | 0.804 | 0.939 | 0.512 | 0.648 | 0.314 | |
4 | 0.325 | 0.763 | 0.778 | 0.909 | 0.870 | 0.888 | 0.360 | 0.906 | 0.922 | 0.622 | 0.605 | 0.303 | |
5 | 0.398 | 0.777 | 0.848 | 0.906 | 0.736 | 0.941 | 0.000 | 0.804 | 0.962 | 0.582 | 0.676 | 0.322 | |
6 | 0.375 | 0.647 | 0.691 | 0.879 | 0.857 | 0.684 | 0.535 | 0.816 | 0.716 | 0.301 | 0.639 | 0.518 | |
7 | 0.230 | 0.892 | 0.842 | 0.804 | 0.748 | 0.663 | 0.099 | 0.846 | 0.995 | 0.538 | 0.751 | 0.360 | |
8 | 0.705 | 0.694 | 0.799 | 0.843 | 0.953 | 0.865 | 0.570 | 0.546 | 0.113 | 0.000 | 0.164 | 0.258 | |
9 | 0.357 | 0.919 | 0.949 | 0.861 | 0.909 | 0.852 | 0.889 | 0.846 | 0.857 | 0.548 | 0.724 | 0.487 | |
10 | 0.283 | 0.756 | 0.743 | 0.973 | 0.819 | 0.815 | 0.863 | 0.714 | 0.833 | 0.576 | 0.718 | 0.329 | |
11 | 0.080 | 0.314 | 0.216 | 0.564 | 0.335 | 0.302 | 0.669 | 0.093 | 0.340 | 0.694 | 0.373 | 0.195 | |
12 | 0.522 | 0.928 | 0.980 | 0.835 | 0.921 | 0.780 | 0.792 | 0.902 | 0.959 | 0.768 | 0.679 | 0.878 | |
13 | 0.487 | 0.497 | 0.587 | 0.690 | 0.770 | 0.935 | 0.518 | 0.809 | 0.779 | 0.612 | 0.870 | 0.687 |
图5 优势种生态位重叠非度量多维标度排序图。编号含义见表2。
Fig. 5 Non-metric multidimensional scaling plot of niche overlap of the dominant species. See Table 2 for the meaning of code numbers.
1 | Ban WQ, Yan C, Yin LK, Yang ML, Wang ZC (2012) Plant species diversity and dominance population niche characteristics at different sites in southern Gurbantunggut Desert. Journal of Desert Research, 32, 1632-1638. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[班卫强, 严成, 尹林克, 杨美琳, 王忠臣 (2012) 古尔班通古特沙漠南缘不同立地条件植物多样性和优势种群生态位特征研究. 中国沙漠, 32, 1632-1638.] | |
2 | Chen Y, Wang HL, Han JW, Wei BL, Jia HR, Ye YZ, Yuan ZL (2014) Numerical classification, ordination and species diversity along elevation gradients of the forest community in Xiaoqinling. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 2068-2075. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[陈云, 王海亮, 韩军旺, 韦博良, 贾宏汝, 叶永忠, 袁志良 (2014) 小秦岭森林群落数量分类、排序及多样性垂直格局. 生态学报, 34, 2068-2075.] | |
3 | Du QY, Li Z, Liu SR Liu HY (2007) Dynamics of species diversity and characteristics of halophytic plant communities around saline lakes in arid and semi-arid regions of Inner Mongolia. Biodiversity Science, 15, 271-281. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[杜泉滢, 李智, 刘书润, 刘鸿雁 (2007) 干旱、半干旱区湖泊周围盐生植物群落的多样性格局及特点. 生物多样性, 15, 271-281.] | |
4 | Gong XW, Lü GH, Ran QY, Yang XD (2016) Response of vegetative growth and biomass allocation of Lappula semiglabra seedlings to dew gradient. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27, 2257-2263. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[龚雪伟, 吕光辉, 冉启洋, 杨晓东 (2016) 狭果鹤虱幼苗营养生长和生物量分配对凝结水梯度的响应. 应用生态学报, 27, 2257-2263.] | |
5 | Gong ZN, Zhao WJ, Hu D (2009) Plant community characteristics and ecological succession model in Yeyahu Wetland under water and salt gradients. Progress in Natural Science, 19, 1272-1280. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[宫兆宁, 赵文吉, 胡东 (2009) 水盐环境梯度下野鸭湖湿地植物群落特征及其生态演替模式. 自然科学进展, 19, 1272-1280.] | |
6 | Huo H, Feng Q, Su YH, Si JH, Xi HY, Yu TF (2013) Interspecies relations and niche analysis on phytocoenosium in the Ejina oasis. Journal of Desert Research, 33, 1027-1033. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[霍红, 冯起, 苏永红, 司建华, 席海洋, 鱼腾飞 (2013) 额济纳绿洲植物群落种间关系和生态位研究. 中国沙漠, 33, 1027-1033.] | |
7 | Lai JS, Mi XC, Ren HB, Ma KP (2010) Numerical classification of associations in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest based on multivariate regression trees—a case study of 24 hm2 Gutianshan forest plot in China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 761-769. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[赖江山, 米湘成, 任海保, 马克平 (2010) 基于多元回归树的常绿阔叶林群丛数量分类——以古田山24公顷森林样地为例. 植物生态学报, 34, 761-769.] | |
8 | Leendertse PC, Roozen AJM, Rozema J (1997) Long-term changes (1953-1990) in the salt marsh vegetation at the Boschplaat on Terschelling in relation to sedimentation and flooding. Plant Ecology, 132, 49-58. |
9 | Levins R (1968) Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. Princeton University Press, Princeton. |
10 | Li CJ, Lü GH, Gong L, Zhang HF, Liu XX (2013) Spatial point pattern and response of clonal plant communities to high drought and salt stress in the Ebinur Lake Wetland Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Arid Zone Research, 30, 122-128. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李尝君, 吕光辉, 贡璐, 张海峰, 刘晓星 (2013) 艾比湖湿地自然保护区克隆植物群落空间格局及其对水盐胁迫的响应. 干旱区研究, 30, 122-128.] | |
11 | Li XS, Yu ZH, Sun S, Jin XS (2013) Ecological niche breadth and niche overlap of dominant species of fish assemblage in Yangtze River estuary and its adjacent waters. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 2353-2359. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李显森, 于振海, 孙珊, 金显仕 (2013) 长江口及其毗邻海域鱼类群落优势种的生态位宽度与重叠. 应用生态学报, 24, 2353-2359.] | |
12 | Liu JZ, Chen YN, Zhang YM (2004) Niche characteristics of plants on four environmental gradients in middle reaches of Tarim River. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 15, 549-555. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘加珍, 陈亚宁, 张元明 (2004) 塔里木河中游植物种群在四种环境梯度上的生态位特征. 应用生态学报, 15, 549-555.] | |
13 | Ma Y, Lü GH, He XM, Zhang XN (2015) Responses of plant diversity and soil factors driving to soil salinity in wetland of Ebinur Lake. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 42(11), 141-147. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[马玉, 吕光辉, 何学敏, 张雪妮 (2015) 盐梯度下艾比湖湿地植物多样性响应及土壤因子驱动研究. 广东农业科学, 42(11), 141-147.] | |
14 | Niu CJ, Lou AR, Sun RY, Li QF (2007) Fundations in Ecology, 2nd edn. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[牛翠娟, 娄安如, 孙儒泳, 李庆芬 (2007) 基础生态学(第二版). 高等教育出版社, 北京.] | |
15 | Otto R, krüsi BO, Burga CA, Fernández-Palacios JM (2006) Old-field succession along a precipitation gradient in the semi-arid coastal region of Tenerife. Journal of Arid Environments, 65, 156-178. |
16 | Pianka ER (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 53-74. |
17 | Spies TA (1990) Canopy gaps in Douglas-fir forests of the Cascade Mountains. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 649-658. |
18 | Tan R, Li W, Yang YM, Du F, Wang J (2013) Niche characteristics of dominant species in Napahai wetland plant communities under different disturbance regimes. Journal of Lake Sciences, 25, 681-687. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[谭芮, 李伟, 杨宇明, 杜凡, 王娟 (2013) 不同干扰条件下纳帕海湿地植物群落优势种群的生态位. 湖泊科学, 25, 681-687.] | |
19 | Tian YZ (1988) Tugayi in the delta of the lower reaches of the Kerya River—a natural complex reflecting ecological degradation. Journal of Desert Research, 8(2), 14-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[田裕钊 (1988) 克里雅河下游三角洲的吐加依——标志生态退化的一种自然综合体. 中国沙漠, 8(2), 14-28.] | |
20 | Tilman D (1999) The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a research for general principles. Ecology, 80, 1455-1474. |
21 | Wang DB, Ji SY, Chen FP (2001) A review on the species diversity of plant community. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 20(4), 55-60. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[汪殿蓓, 暨淑仪, 陈飞鹏 (2001) 植物群落物种多样性研究综述. 生态学杂志, 20(4), 55-60.] | |
22 | Wang HL, Lü GH, Yang XD (2011) Interspecific association of main plants in Ebinur Lake Wetland of Xinjiang, Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 30, 2713-2718. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王合玲, 吕光辉, 杨晓东 (2011) 新疆艾比湖湿地主要植物的种间关联分析. 生态学杂志, 30, 2713-2718.] | |
23 | Wang HL, Zhang HG, Lü GH (2013) Quantitative classification and ordination of plant communities in Ebinur Lake Wetland. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 27, 177-181. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王合玲, 张辉国, 吕光辉 (2013) 艾比湖湿地植物群落的数量分类和排序. 干旱区资源与环境, 27, 177-181.] | |
24 | Wang LJ, Zhao CY, Li J, Zhu H, Kou SY (2009) Study on the early-spring species diversity in a Haloxylon desert in the north Fukang region, Xinjiang. Arid Zone Research, 26, 574-581. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王丽娟, 赵成义, 李君, 朱宏, 寇思勇 (2009) 阜康北部梭梭荒漠早春物种多样性研究. 干旱区研究, 26, 574-581.] | |
25 | Wang TQ, Lü GH, Cao J, Zhao XY, Liu ZD, Liu W (2015) Point pattern analysis on dominant populations in Ebinur Lake district. Xinjiang Agricultural Science, 52, 2305-2313. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王庭权, 吕光辉, 曹靖, 赵晓英, 刘志东, 刘薇 (2015) 艾比湖地区主要植物种群点格局分析. 新疆农业科学, 52, 2305-2313.] | |
26 | Wu ZY (1980) Vegetation of China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[吴征镒 (1980)中国植被. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
27 | Yang F, Wang ZC, Wang YH, An FH, Zhao CW (2013) The correlation between soil water salinity and plant community distribution under micro-topography in Songnen Plain. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 6202-6208. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[杨帆, 王志春, 王云贺, 安丰华, 赵长巍 (2013) 松嫩草原微地形下土壤水盐与植物群落分布的关系. 生态学报, 33, 6202-6208.] | |
28 | Yuan Y, Fu DP, Lü GH (2008) Inter-specific relations of the dominant plants of the wetland vegetation in the Ebinur Lake Wetland in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Wetland Science, 6, 486-491. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[袁月, 傅德平, 吕光辉 (2008) 新疆艾比湖湿地植被优势种种间关系研究. 湿地科学, 6, 486-491.] | |
29 | Zhang JT (2011) Quantitative Ecology, 2nd edn. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[张金屯 (2011) 数量生态学(第二版). 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
30 | Zhang W, Wang WL, Hu YK, Yin W, Gong YM, Fang F, Abeutailpu A (2011) Characteristics of plant niche under different restoration measures in Ili desert grassland of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 19, 358-362. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[张伟, 王万林, 胡玉昆, 尹伟, 公延明, 房飞, 阿德列提·艾列吾塔力甫 (2011) 新疆伊犁荒漠草原恢复措施下植物群落生态位特征分析. 中国生态农业学报, 19, 358-362.] | |
31 | Zhang XN, Lü GH, Yang XD, Gong L, Qin L, He XM, Liu HQ (2013) Responses of desert plant diversity, community and interspecific association to soil salinity gradient. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 5714-5722. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[张雪妮, 吕光辉, 杨晓东, 贡璐, 秦璐, 何学敏, 刘昊奇 (2013) 基于盐分梯度的荒漠植物多样性与群落、种间联结响应. 生态学报, 33, 5714-5722.] | |
32 | Zhang YL, Xu QJ, Xi BD, Zhang LY (2011) Major problems and control measures of water ecological environment in Inner Mongolia Xinjiang Plateau. Journal of Lake Science, 23, 828-836. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[张亚丽, 许秋瑾, 席北斗, 张列宇 (2011) 中国蒙新高原湖区水环境主要问题及控制对策. 湖泊科学, 23, 828-836.] | |
33 | Zhao XC, Lai LM, Zhu LH, Wang JJ, Wang YJ, Zhou JH, Jiang LH, Lu HB, Zhao CQ, Zheng YR (2014) Correlation between characteristics of Reaumuria soongarica communities and soil factors in the Sangong River basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 878-889. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[赵学春, 来利明, 朱林海, 王健健, 王永吉, 周继华, 姜联合, 鲁洪斌, 赵春强, 郑元润 (2014) 三工河流域琵琶柴群落特征与土壤因子的相关分析. 生态学报, 34, 878-889.] | |
34 | Zhao ZY, Wang RH, Yin CH, Wang L (2007) Influence of spatial heterogeneity of soil salinity on plant community structure and composition of plain at south piedmont of Tianshan Mountains. Arid Land Geography, 30, 839-845. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[赵振勇, 王让会, 尹传华, 王雷 (2007) 天山南麓山前平原土壤盐分空间异质性对植物群落组成及结构的影响. 干旱区地理, 30, 839-845.] | |
35 | Zhou C, He LH, Yang N (2010) Variations in the Ebinur Lake area caused by human activities and climatic changes. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 30, 121-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[周驰, 何隆华, 杨娜 (2010) 人类活动和气候变化对艾比湖湖泊面积的影响. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 30, 121-126.] | |
36 | Zhu ZL, Li DZ, Wang XP, Sheng LJ, Shi Q (2006) Water physiology integration and its ecological effect of clonal plants. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 26, 2602-2614. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[朱志玲, 李德志, 王绪平, 盛丽娟, 石强 (2006) 克隆植物的水分生理整合及其生态效应. 西北植物学报, 26, 2602-2614.] |
[1] | 吕晓波, 李东海, 杨小波, 张孟文. 红树林群落通过淹水时间及海水盐度的生态位分化实现物种共存[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23302-. |
[2] | 张楚然, 李生发, 李逢昌, 唐志忠, 刘辉燕, 王丽红, 顾荣, 邓云, 张志明, 林露湘. 云南鸡足山亚热带半湿润常绿阔叶林20 ha动态监测样地木本植物生境关联与群落数量分类[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23393-. |
[3] | 陈敏豪, 张超, 王嘉栋, 湛振杰, 陈君帜, 栾晓峰. 北美水貂和欧亚水獭在东北地区的分布与生态位重叠[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22289-. |
[4] | 郭朝丹, 赵彩云, 李飞飞, 李俊生. 天然林和人工林外来入侵和本地植物对比研究: 以弄岗国家级自然保护区为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(4): 21356-. |
[5] | 康佳鹏, 韩路, 冯春晖, 王海珍. 塔里木荒漠河岸林不同生境群落物种多度分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 875-886. |
[6] | 施国杉, 刘峰, 陈典, 邓云, 林露湘. 云南纳板河热带季节雨林20 ha动态监测样地的树种组成与群落分类[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 10-20. |
[7] | 王剑, 董乙乂, 马丽滨, 潘勃, 马方舟, 丁晖, 胡亚萍, 彭艳琼, 吴孝兵, 王波. 西双版纳国家级自然保护区蚂蚁-树互作网络空间变异[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(6): 695-706. |
[8] | 李霞, 朱万泽, 孙守琴, 舒树淼, 盛哲良, 张军, 刘亭, 张志才. 大渡河中游干暖河谷区生境对植物群落分布格局和多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(2): 117-127. |
[9] | 陈惠君, 杜虎, 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 张浩, 苏樑, 曾馥平. 木论喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林群丛数量分类及稳定性[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(10): 1056-1068. |
[10] | 宋乃平, 王兴, 陈林, 薛毅, 陈娟, 随金明, 王磊, 杨新国. 荒漠草原“土岛”生境群落物种共存机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(7): 667-677. |
[11] | 徐开达, 卢衎尔, 卢占晖, 戴乾. 韭山列岛自然保护区虾类优势种生态位[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(6): 601-610. |
[12] | 孙燕, 周忠实, 王瑞, HeinzMüller-Schärer. 气候变化预计会减少东亚地区豚草的生物防治效果**[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(12): 1285-1294. |
[13] | 胡成业, 水玉跃, 田阔, 李良, 覃胡林, 张春草, 冀萌萌, 水柏年. 浙江七星列岛海洋特别保护区主要鱼类功能群划分及生态位分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(2): 175-184. |
[14] | 黄甫昭, 王斌, 丁涛, 向悟生, 李先琨, 周爱萍. 弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林群丛数量 分类及与环境的关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(2): 157-166. |
[15] | 田中平, 庄丽, 李建贵, 程模香. 伊犁河谷北坡野果林木本植物种间关系 及环境解释[J]. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(3): 335-342. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn