雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植被物种多样性比较:气候、地形与空间的影响

doi:10.17520/biods.2015300

生物多样性 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 421-430. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015300

所属专题：中国西南干旱河谷的植物多样性

雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植被物种多样性比较:气候、地形与空间的影响

韩杰¹, 沈泽昊^1,^*(), 石松林^2,³, 彭培好²

1 北京大学城市与环境学院生态学系, 地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室, 北京 100871。
2 成都理工大学旅游与城乡规划学院, 成都 610058。
3 中国科学院生态环境研究中心区域与城市生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100875

收稿日期:2015-11-01 接受日期:2016-02-02 出版日期:2016-04-20 发布日期:2016-05-11
通讯作者: 沈泽昊
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41371190)和交通运输部西部计划项目(2008 318 799 17)

Comparison of plant species diversity and composition in the dry valleys of Yalong River and Dadu River: evaluating the effects of climate, topography and space

Jie Han¹, Zehao Shen^1,^*(), Songlin Shi^2,³, Peihao Peng²

1 Department of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871.
2 College of Tourism and Urban-rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610058.
3 State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100875

Received:2015-11-01 Accepted:2016-02-02 Online:2016-04-20 Published:2016-05-11
Contact: Shen Zehao

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

干旱河谷植被是我国西南横断山区的一类特殊的隐域性生态系统, 影响不同河谷之间植物群落差异的因素与作用大小尚不清楚。本研究调查了四川省雅砻江和大渡河流域干旱河谷段植被组成, 并比较了两个地区在植物多样性上的差别。结果表明: (1)影响两个地区植被类型的主要因素不同, 雅砻江干旱河谷植被主要受海拔和地形(坡度和坡向)影响, 大渡河干旱河谷植被主要受年平均降水量影响。(2)雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植物物种丰富度均随着年均温升高而降低。(3)坡向由北至南, 雅砻江干旱河谷灌木、草本物种丰富度减小, 而大渡河干旱河谷灌木、草本丰富度增加。(4)坡度越大, 雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷灌木的丰富度越高。(5)雅砻江、大渡河干旱河谷植物β多样性受环境距离影响大, 受地理距离影响小。两条江植被间地理隔离效应约为地理距离产生差异的5倍。本研究弥补了干旱河谷研究中对于雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植物多样性研究的空白, 为相关区域植被保护提供了参考信息, 同时还为定量估计地理隔离效应对区域间生物多样性差异的影响提供了可行方法。

关键词: 干旱河谷, 植物多样性, 植被类型, 地理隔离

Abstract

The vegetation of dry valleys is a suit of unique azonal ecosystems embedded in the Hengduan Mountains region of Southwest China, with the difference of plant communities between the valleys and the causal factors still elusive. In this study, we investigated the dry valleys of the Yalong River and the Dadu River and compared plant diversity. Different factors were found to impact the vegetation types between the two rivers. Elevation and topography (slope and aspect) impacted vegetation types of the Yalong River and mean annual precipitation impacted the Dadu River. Plant richness in the valleys of the two rivers decreased with greater mean annual temperature. From a north to south aspect, plant richness of the dry valley communities decreased in the Yalong River, while increased in the Dadu River. Richness of shrubs in both the Yalong River and the Dadu River were greater at increased slopes. The β diversity of plant community in the dry valleys of the Yalong River and the Dadu River was affected more by environmental than geographical distance. The effect of geographical isolation on the two rivers was approximately 5 times greater than the effect of geographical distance. This research fills the knowledge gap about plant diversity of dry valleys vegetation in the Yalong River and the Dadu River, and reference information for vegetation conservation in the dry valleys of the two rivers. In addition, it provides a practical method for the quantitative assessment of geographical isolation effect on regional biodiversity difference.

Key words: dry valley, plant diversity, vegetation types, geographical isolation

韩杰, 沈泽昊, 石松林, 彭培好 (2016) 雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植被物种多样性比较:气候、地形与空间的影响. 生物多样性, 24, 421-430. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015300.

Jie Han, Zehao Shen, Songlin Shi, Peihao Peng (2016) Comparison of plant species diversity and composition in the dry valleys of Yalong River and Dadu River: evaluating the effects of climate, topography and space. Biodiversity Science, 24, 421-430. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015300.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2015300

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2016/V24/I4/421

图/表 8

图1 雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷的气候条件和调查样带分布

Fig. 1 Climate condition and the distribution of transect sites in dry valleys of the Yalong River and the Dadu River

图2 雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植物种-面积曲线

Fig. 2 The species-area curve for plant species in dry valleys of the Yalong River and the Dadu River

表1 雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植物丰富度的混合效应模型模拟结果

Table 1 The mixed-effect model estimated for plant richness in dry valleys of the Yalong River and the Dadu River

		年均温 Mean annual temperature	坡向 Aspect	坡度 Slope	河流解释 River explanation	限制性最大似然估计 REML criterion
灌木层 Shrub layer	雅砻江 The Yalong River	-0.202^**	-0.747^**	0.020^*	92.10%	76.1
灌木层 Shrub layer	大渡河 The Dadu River	-0.432^**	1.005^**	0.016^*	92.10%	76.1
草本层 Herb layer	雅砻江 The Yalong River	-0.537^**	-0.687^**	-	92.20%	104.9
草本层 Herb layer	大渡河 The Dadu River	-0.969^**	1.451^**	-	92.20%	104.9

表2 雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植物群落类型特征(平均值±标准差)

Table 2 The features of community types in dry valleys of the Yalong River and the Dadu River (mean ± SD)

群落类型 Community type	河流 River	海拔 Elevation (m)	灌木密度 Shrub density (/100 m²)	草本密度 Herb density (/100 m²)	植被型 Vegetation type
类型A Type A	大渡河 The Dadu River	1,200	9 ± 4	41 ± 10	亚热带针阔叶混交林Coniferous and broadleaved mixed forest in subtropical
类型B Type B	大渡河-雅砻江 The Dadu River-the Yalong River	1,400	3 ± 1	19 ± 3	暖性落叶阔叶灌丛 Warm deciduous broadleaved shrub
类型C Type C	雅砻江 The Yalong River	2,600	4 ± 2	21 ± 4	暖性落叶阔叶灌丛 Warm deciduous broadleaved shrub
类型D Type D	雅砻江 The Yalong River	2,700	6 ± 3	26 ± 6	暖性落叶阔叶灌丛 Warm deciduous broadleaved shrub
类型E Type E	雅砻江 The Yalong River	2,500	4 ± 1	25 ± 7	暖性落叶阔叶灌丛 Warm deciduous broadleaved shrub

图3 雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植物TWINSPAN群落分类图。(+)表示与分类聚组正相关,(-)表示与分类聚组负相关。

Fig. 3 Diagram of TWINSPAN for community classification in dry valleys of the Yalong River and the Dadu River. (+) means it is positive relation with classification, (-) means it is negative relation with classification.

图4 雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植物群落的CCA排序。群落类型A、B、C、D、E含义同图3。

Fig. 4 The CCA ordination for plant communities in dry valleys of the Yalong River and the Dadu River. MAP, Mean annual precipitation; PDQ, Precipitation in driest quarter. The meaning of Type A, B, C, D and E are the same as in Fig. 3.

图5 雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷地理隔离效应曲线。相关系数指的是Jaccard相似性系数矩阵与地理距离矩阵的相关系数。

Fig. 5 The geographical isolation curve in dry valleys of the Yalong River and the Dadu River. R means the correlation coefficient between Jaccard similarity index matrix and geography distance matrix.

表3 雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植物物种构成相似性Mantel检验及偏Mantel检验

Table 3 The results of Mantel test and partial Mantel test for similarities of plant species composition between dry valleys of the Yalong River and the Dadu River

距离矩阵 Distance matrices	R	P
环境 Environmental	-0.727	0.001
环境\|地理距离 Environmental \| Geographical distance	-0.543	0.001
环境\|5倍地理距离 Environments \| 5 × Geographical distance	-0.401	0.002
地理距离 Geographical distance	-0.576	0.001
地理距离\|环境 Geographical distance \| Environments	-0.013	0.513
5 ×地理距离\|环境 5 × Geographical distance \| Environments	-0.451	0.001

参考文献 62

1	Antillensis E, Barker BS, Rodríguez-Robles JA, Aran VS, Waide RB, Cook JA (2012) Sea level, topography and island diversity: phylogeography of the Puerto Rican Red-eyed Coquí. Molecular Ecology, 21, 6033-6052.
2	Bai WQ, Zhang YL, Bao WK (2003) Landscape patterns and dynamics in the upper reaches of Dadu River. Journal of Natural Resources, 18(1), 75-80.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[摆万奇, 张镱锂, 包维楷 (2003) 大渡河上游地区景观格局与动态. 自然资源学报,18(1), 75-80.]
3	Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48.
4	Brown JH, Stevens GC, Kaufman DM (1996) The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 597-623.
5	Cao M, Jin ZZ (1989) Classification of vegetation in Qiao Jia dry-hot river valley of Jinsha River, Yunnan. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 11, 324-336.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[曹敏, 金振洲 (1989) 云南巧家金沙江干热河谷的植被分类. 云南植物研究, 11, 324-336.]
6	Fang JY, Song YC, Liu HY, Piao SL (2002) Vegetation-climate relationship and its application in the division of vegetation zone in China. Acta Botanica Sinica, 44, 1105-1122.
7	Fjeldså J, Bowie RCK, Rahbek C (2012) The role of mountain ranges in the diversification of birds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 43, 249-265.
8	Guan WB, Yan MS, Ma KM, Liu GH, Wang XL, Tang H (2004) The relationships between plant community species turnover rates and environmental factors in the arid valley of Minjiang River. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24, 2367-2373.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[关文彬, 冶民生, 马克明, 刘国华, 汪西林, 谭辉 (2004) 岷江干旱河谷植物群落物种周转速率与环境因子的关系. 生态学报, 24, 2367-2373.]
9	He F, Xie W, Liu XL, Ma QY, He YP, Chen JH, Cai XH, Long TL (2008) Pteridophytic flora of the upper reaches of the Yalong River in western Sichuan Province. Journal of Chengdu University (Natural Science Edition), 27, 276-280.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[何飞, 谢伟, 刘兴良, 马钦彦, 何亚平, 陈俊华, 蔡小虎, 隆廷伦 (2008) 川西雅砻江上游地区蕨类植物区系研究. 成都大学学报(自然科学版), 27, 276-280.]
10	Hawkins BA, Field R, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Guegan JF, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdorff T, O’Brien EM, Porter EE, Turner JRG (2003) Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology, 84, 3105-3117.
11	Hill MO (1979) TWINSPAN—A Fortran Program for Arranging Multivariate Data in an Ordered Two-way Table by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
12	Jaccard P (1912) The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytologist, 11, 37-50.
13	Jacquemyn H, Butaye J, Hermy M (2001) Forest plant species richness in small, fragmented mixed deciduous forest patches: the role of area, time and dispersal limitation. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 801-812.
14	Jenkins DG, Carey M, Czerniewska J, Fletcher J, Hether T, Jones A, Knight S, Knox J, Long T, Mannino M, McGuire M, Riffle A, Segelsky S, Shappell L, Sterner A, Strickler T, Tursi R (2010) A meta-analysis of isolation by distance: relic or reference standard for landscape genetics? Ecography, 33, 315-320.
15	Jin ZZ (1998) Study on the floristic elements of seed plant in the dry-warm valleys of Yunnan and Sichuan. Guihaia, 18, 313-321.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[金振洲 (1998) 滇川干暖河谷种子植物区系成分研究. 广西植物,18, 313-321.]
16	Jin ZZ (1999a) The floristic study on seed plants in the dry-hot valleys, Yunnan and Sichuan. Guihaia, 19, 1-14.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[金振洲 (1999a) 滇川干热河谷种子植物区系成分研究. 广西植物, 19, 1-14.]
17	Jin ZZ (1999b) A phytosociological study on the semi-savanna vegetation in the dry-hot valleys of Yuanjiang River, Yunnan. Guihaia, 19, 289-302.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[金振洲 (1999b) 云南元江干热河谷半萨王纳植被的植物群落学研究. 广西植物, 19, 289-302.]
18	Jin ZZ (2002) Floristic Features of Dry-hot and Dry-warm Valleys in Yunnan and Sichuan Provinces. Yunnan Science & Technology Press, Kunming.(in Chinese)
	[金振洲 (2002) 滇川干热河谷与干暖河谷植物区系特征. 云南科技出版社, 昆明.]
19	Jin ZZ, Ou XK (2000) Yuanjiang, Nujiang, Jinshajiang, Lancangjiang Vegetation of Dry-Hot Valley. Yunnan University Press, Yunnan Science & Technology Press, Kunming.(in Chinese)
	[金振洲, 欧晓昆 (2000) 元江、怒江、金沙江、澜沧江干热河谷植被. 云南大学出版社, 云南科技出版社, 昆明.]
20	Keddy PA (1992) Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 3, 157-164.
21	Kudoh H (2001) Gene flow among plant populations in ecological landscape. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 84, 1285-1293.
22	Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical Ecology, pp. 139-141, 247-258, 279. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
23	Lomolino MV (2000) Ecology’s most general, yet protean pattern: the species-area relationship. Journal of Biogeography, 27, 17-26.
24	Liu LH (1989) Vegetational types of the valleys in the Hengduan Mountains region. Mountain Research, 7, 175-182.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘伦辉 (1989) 横断山区干旱河谷植被类型. 山地研究, 7, 175-182.]
25	Liu XL, Mu CL, Xiang CH, Su YM (2001) Natural features of arid river valleys in western Sichuan and their vegetation restoring and reestablishing ways. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 22(2), 10-17.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘兴良, 慕长龙, 向成华, 宿以明 (2001) 四川西部干旱河谷自然特征及植被恢复与重建途径. 四川林业科技, 22(2), 10-17.]
26	Liu Y (2015) Plant Diversity and Biogeography of the Arid Valleys in Southwest China. PhD dissertation, Peking University, Beijing.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘晔 (2015) 中国西南干旱河谷植物多样性与生物地理. 博士学位论文, 北京大学, 北京.]
27	Liu ZZ, Peng PH, Zhou ZK (2013) Application of 3S techniques in vegetation type investigation in Yajiang. Geospatial Information, 11(2), 78-79.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘中正, 彭培好, 周正坤(2013) 基于3S技术的雅江县植被类型调查与分析. 地理空间信息, 11(2) 78-79.]
28	Little RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW (1996) SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
29	Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 189-197.
30	Manel S, Segelbacher G (2009) Perspectives and challenges in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology, 18, 1821-1822.
31	Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27, 209-220.
32	McCune B, Mefford M (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, version 4.0. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.
33	Niu KC, Liu YN, Shen ZH, He FL, Fang JY (2009) Community assembly: the relative importance of neutral theory and niche theory. Biodiversity Science, 17, 579-593.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[牛克昌, 刘怿宁, 沈泽昊, 何芳良, 方精云 (2009) 群落构建的中性理论和生态位理论. 生物多样性, 17, 579-593.]
34	Ohsawa T, Saito Y, Sawada H, Ide Y (2008) Impact of altitude and topography on the genetic diversity of Quercus serrata populations in the Chichibu Mountains, central Japan. Flora, 203, 187-196.
35	Ou XK (1988) The study of flora in Yuanmou dry-hot river valley. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 10, 11-18.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[欧晓昆 (1988) 元谋干热河谷植物区系研究. 云南植物研究, 10, 11-18.]
36	Ou XK, Jin ZZ (1996) A preliminary study on the flora and ecological diversity in Jinsha River dry-hot valley. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 14, 318-322.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[欧晓昆, 金振洲 (1996) 金沙江干热河谷植物区系和生态多样性的初步研究. 武汉植物学研究, 14, 318-322.]
37	Preston FW (1962) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology, 43, 185-215.
38	Rahbek C, Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK, Entsminger GL, Rangel, TFL, Graves GR (2007) Predicting continental-scale patterns of bird species richness with spatially explicit models. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. Biological Sciences, 274, 165-174.
39	Siefert A, Razvenscroft C, Weiser MD, Swenson NG (2013) Functional beta-diversity patterns reveal deterministic community assembly processes in eastern North American trees. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 22, 682-691.
40	Shen R, Zhang JL, He B, Li F, Zhang ZM, Zhou R, Ou XK (2010) The structure characteristic and analysis on similarity of grassland community in dry-hot valley of Yuanjiang River. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 19, 2821-2825.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[沈蕊, 张建利, 何彪, 李峰, 张志明, 周睿, 欧晓昆 (2010) 元江流域干热河谷草地植物群落结构特征与相似性分析. 生态环境学报, 19, 2821-2821.]
41	Shen ZH, Fang JY, Liu ZL, Wu J (2001) Patterns of biodiversity along the vertical vegetation spectrum of the east aspect of Gongga Mountains. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica 25, 721-732.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[沈泽昊, 方精云, 刘增力, 伍杰 (2001) 贡嘎山东坡植被垂直带谱的物种多样性格局分析. 植物生态学报, 25, 721-732.]
42	Shen ZH, Fei SL, Feng JM, Liu YN, Liu ZL, Tang ZY, Wang XP, Wu XP, Zheng CY, Zhu B, Fang JY (2012) Geographical patterns of community-based tree species richness in Chinese mountain forests: the effects of contemporary climate and regional history. Ecography, 35, 1134-1146.
43	Shen ZH, Ji CJ (2010) Landscape genetics: principles and its applications for the genetic effects of habitat fragmentation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 5066-5076.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[沈泽昊, 吉成均 (2010) 景观遗传学原理及其在生境片断化遗传效应研究中的应用. 生态学报, 30, 5066-5076.]
44	Shen ZH, Jin YX, Zhao ZE, Wu JQ, Huang HD (2000) A study on the quantitative classification of forest communities of Dalaoling region at the Three Gorges. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 18, 99-107.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[沈泽昊, 金义兴, 赵子恩, 吴金清, 黄汉东(2000) 三峡大老岭地区森林群落的数量分类研究. 武汉植物学研究, 18, 99-107.]
45	Slatkin M, Maddison W (1990) Detecting isolation by distance using phylogenies of genes. Genetics, 126, 249-260.
46	Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and nonequilibrium populations. Evolution, 47, 264-279.
47	Sork VL, Nason J, Campbell DR, Fernendez JF (1999) Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 219-224.
48	Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS, Goldberg CS, Robinson S, Spear SF (2007) Putting the “landscape” in landscape genetics. Heredity, 98, 128-142.
49	Tang ZY, Fang JY, Chi XL, Feng JM, Liu YN, Shen ZH, Wang XP, Wang ZH, Wu XP, Zheng CY, Gaston KJ (2012) Patterns of plant beta-diversity along elevational and latitudinal gradients in mountain forests of China. Ecography, 35, 1083-1091.
50	Thomas K, Anna MH, Thomas W (2004) Rarefaction method for assessing plant species diversity on a regional scale. Ecography, 27, 532-544.
51	Wan DH, Xia J, Song XF, Liu SX (2008) Evaluation of ecological water requirement based on hydrological cycle analysis. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 39, 994-1000.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[万东辉, 夏军, 宋献方, 刘苏峡 (2008) 基于水文循环分析的雅砻江流域生态需水量计算. 水利学报, 39, 994-1000.]
52	Wang IJ (2012) Environmental and topographic variables shape genetic structure and effective population sizes in the endan-
53	gered Yosemite toad. Diversity and Distributions, 18, 1033-1041.
54	Wang YJ, Huang CD, Zhang J, Yang WQ, Wang XS (2010) Species diversity, biomass and their relationship of shrubberies in an arid valley of the Minjiang River. Arid Zone Research, 27, 567-572.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王勇军, 黄从德, 张健, 杨万勤, 王宪帅 (2010) 岷江干旱河谷灌丛物种多样性. 生物量及其关系. 干旱区研究, 27, 567-572.]
55	Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics, 28, 114-138.
56	Ye MS, Guan WB, Tan H, Ma KM, Liu GH, Wang XL (2004) The α diversity of shrubs community in the arid valley of the Minjiang River. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24, 1123-1130.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[冶民生, 关文彬, 谭辉, 马克明, 刘国华, 汪西林 (2004) 岷江干旱河谷灌丛α多样性分析. 生态学报, 6, 1123-1130.]
57	Ye MS, Guan WB, Wu B, Ma KM, Liu GH, Wang XL, Chen JY (2006) Plant community complexity in the arid valley of Minjiang River. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26, 3159-3165.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[冶民生, 关文彬, 吴斌, 马克明, 刘国华, 汪西林, 陈箐妍 (2006) 岷江干旱河谷植物群落的复杂性. 生态学报, 26, 3159-3165.]
58	Yang QZ (2007) Study on the arid-valley scrubs in the upper reaches of Minjing River. Journal of Mountain Research, 25(1), 1-32.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[杨钦周(2007) 岷江上游干旱河谷灌丛研究. 山地学报, 25(1), 1-32.]
59	Yu X, Feng L, Yan DH, Jia YW, Yang SH, Hu DL, Zhang MZ (2008) Development of distributed hydrological model for Yalongjiang River Basin. Journal of China Hydrology, 28(3), 49-53.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[俞烜, 冯琳, 严登华, 贾仰文, 杨舒媛, 胡东来, 张明珠 (2008) 雅砻江流域分布式水文模型开发研究.水文, 28(3), 49-53.]
60	Zhang JT, Li S, Li M (2010) A comparison of self-organizing feature map clustering with twinspan and fuzzy C-means clustering in the analysis of woodland communities in the Guancen Mts, China. Community Ecology, 11, 120-126.
61	Zhang RZ (1992) The Dry Valleys of the Hengduan Mountains Region. Science Press, Beijing.(in Chinese)
	[张荣祖 (1992) 横断山区干旱河谷. 科学出版社, 北京.]
62	Zhang WH, Lu T, Zhou JY, Kang YX, Ma KM, Liu GH (2003) A floristic study on seed plants in the upper reaches of Minjiang River. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 23, 888-894.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张文辉, 卢涛, 周建云, 康永祥, 马克明, 刘国华 (2003) 岷江上游流域种子植物区系研究. 西北植物学报, 23, 888-894.]

[1]	肖翠, 刘冰, 吴超然, 马金双, 叶建飞, 夏晓飞, 林秦文. 北京维管植物编目和分布数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 22064-.
[2]	林秦文, 肖翠, 马金双. 中国外来植物数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 22127-.
[3]	吴仁武, 南歆格, 晏海, 杨凡, 史琰, 包志毅. 梅耶(Frank Nicholas Meyer)在亚欧国家引种植物的路线和种类调查[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(11): 22063-.
[4]	刘璐, 迟瑶, 吴朝宁, 钱天陆, 王结臣. 陆栖哺乳动物的地理隔离研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(8): 1134-1145.
[5]	张全建, 杨彪, 付强, 王磊, 龚旭, 张远彬. 邛崃山系水鹿的冬季食性[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(10): 1192-1201.
[6]	李强, 王彬, 邓云, 林露湘, 达佤扎喜, 张志明. 西双版纳热带雨林林窗空间分布格局及其特征数与林窗下植物多样性的相关性[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(3): 273-285.
[7]	姬红利, 詹选怀, 张丽, 彭焱松, 周赛霞, 胡菀. 幕阜山脉石松类和蕨类植物多样性及生物地理学特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(11): 1251-1259.
[8]	张宇, 冯刚. 内蒙古昆虫物种多样性分布格局及其机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(7): 701-706.
[9]	刘杰, 罗亚皇, 李德铢, 高连明. 青藏高原及毗邻区植物多样性演化与维持机制: 进展及展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(2): 163-174.
[10]	李利平, 安尼瓦尔·买买提, 努尔巴依·阿布都沙力克, 努尔佳玛丽·沙尔巴依, 万华伟. 新疆山地森林乔木和草地草本植物个体大小分布特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(11): 1202-1212.
[11]	李云琴, 杜凡, 汪健, 李瑞年, 刘洋. 金沙江上游干旱河谷植被[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(4): 489-494.
[12]	沈泽昊, 张志明, 胡金明, 韩杰, 杨济达, 应凌霄. 西南干旱河谷植物多样性资源的保护与利用[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(4): 475-488.
[13]	刘晔, 朱鑫鑫, 沈泽昊, 孙航. 中国西南干旱河谷植被的区系地理成分与空间分异[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(4): 367-377.
[14]	刘晔, 李鹏, 许玥, 石松林, 应凌霄, 张婉君, 彭培好, 沈泽昊. 中国西南干旱河谷植物群落的数量分类和排序分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(4): 378-388.
[15]	杨阳, 韩杰, 刘晔, 忠永茨仁, 石松林, 斯那此里, 许玥, 应凌霄, 张婉君, 沈泽昊. 三江并流地区干旱河谷植物物种多样性海拔梯度格局比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(4): 440-452.

雅砻江和大渡河干旱河谷植被物种多样性比较:气候、地形与空间的影响

Comparison of plant species diversity and composition in the dry valleys of Yalong River and Dadu River: evaluating the effects of climate, topography and space

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 62

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价