生物多样性 ›› 2010, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 83-89.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2010.083

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同来源AM真菌对朱砂根生长和生理特征的影响

穆宏平1, 2, 陈贻竹1, 曹洪麟1, 叶万辉1   

  1. 1 (中国科学院华南植物园, 广州 510650)
    2 (中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049)
  • 收稿日期:2009-10-20 出版日期:2010-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 叶万辉

Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from different sources on the growth and physiology of Ardisia crenata

Hongping Mu1, 2, Yizhu Chen1, Honglin Cao1, Wanhui Ye1   

  1. 1 South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650
    2 Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
  • Received:2009-10-20 Online:2010-01-20
  • Contact: Wanhui Ye

朱砂根(Ardisia crenata)原产于东亚和东南亚地区, 现已入侵美国南部等地区。为了探讨AM真菌对朱砂根入侵能力的影响, 我们以根段接种的方法扩繁了源自入侵地美国德克萨斯州和原产地广东东莞、四川峨眉山和湖北兴山的朱砂根根系中的AM真菌, 研究了这些不同来源的AM真菌对朱砂根生长和生理状况的影响。结果表明4个不同来源的AM真菌均能够提高朱砂根的叶面积比(LAR)和相对生长速率(RGR), 而对其饱和净光合速率(Pn)、呼吸速率(Rd)、根冠比(R/S)和各器官中氮、磷营养元素含量均没有显著影响。四个不同来源的AM真菌对朱砂根的作用略有差异, 其中入侵地德克萨斯州与原产地广东东莞AM真菌对朱砂根生长的促进作用较强, 但入侵地AM真菌对朱砂根的促进作用并不普遍高于原产地, AM真菌的作用可能并不是导致入侵种群密度远高于本土种群密度的因素。

关键词: 群落结构动态, 物种多样性, 造礁石珊瑚, 鹿回头岸礁

Ardisia crenata, a shrubby flowering plant native to East and Southeast Asia, is now invasive in southern USA and elsewhere. We used the trap culture method with A. crenata root fragments of as inocula to obtain host-associated arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. AM fungi were obtained from the species’ invasive range in Texas, USA, and its’ native range in Dongguan in Guangdong Province, Emei Mountain in Sichuan Province and Xingshan in Hubei Province in China. The influences of these AM fungi from different sources on the growth and physiology of A. crenata were determined. Inoculation with all strains of AM fungi increased leaf area ratio (LAR) and relative growth rate (RGR), but did not influence net photosynthetic rate at saturated light (Pn), respiration rate (Rd), ratio of root to shoot (R/S), nitrogen and phosphorus concentration. There were some differences in the effects of AM fungi from different sources. AM fungi sourced from Dongguan in the native range and Texas in the invasive range had equal influence on A. cre-nata, being more stimulative than AM fungi from other sources. AM fungi sourced from the invasive range did not promote more growth of A. crenata than the combined AM fungi sourced from the native range. Therefore, we conclude that the effects of AM fungi may not be an important factor leading to higher density of A. crenata in invasive populations than in native populations.

Key words: community structure, dynamics, species diversity, hermatypic corals, Luhuitou fringing reef

[1] 邹安龙, 马素辉, 倪晓凤, 蔡琼, 李修平, 吉成均. 模拟氮沉降对北京东灵山辽东栎群落林下植物物种多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(6): 607-618.
[2] 胡宜峰, 余文华, 岳阳, 黄正澜懿, 李玉春, 吴毅. 海南岛翼手目物种多样性现状与分布预测[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(4): 400-408.
[3] 颜文博,吉晟男,帅凌鹰,赵雷刚,朱大鹏,曾治高. 秦岭南坡陕西洋县辖区哺乳动物物种多样性的空间分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(2): 177-185.
[4] 陈作艺, 许晓静, 朱素英, 翟梦怡, 李扬. 中国沿海洛氏角毛藻复合群的多样性组成及地理分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(2): 149-158.
[5] 邹东廷, 王庆刚, 罗奥, 王志恒. 中国蔷薇科植物多样性格局及其资源植物保护现状[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(1): 1-15.
[6] 王波, 黄勇, 李家堂, 戴强, 王跃招, 杨道德. 西南喀斯特地貌区两栖动物丰富度分布格局与环境因子的关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(9): 941-950.
[7] 孙德鑫, 刘向, 周淑荣. 停止人为去除植物功能群后的高寒草甸多样性恢复过程与群落构建[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(7): 655-666.
[8] 张宇, 冯刚. 内蒙古昆虫物种多样性分布格局及其机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(7): 701-706.
[9] 陶夏秋, 崔绍朋, 蒋志刚, 初红军, 李娜, 杨道德, 李春旺. 新疆阿勒泰地区爬行动物区系及多样性海拔分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(6): 578-589.
[10] 田成, 李俊清, 杨旭煜, 余鳞, 袁丹, 黎运喜. 利用红外相机技术对四川王朗国家级自然保护区野生动物物种多样性的初步调查[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(6): 620-626.
[11] 温韩东, 林露湘, 杨洁, 胡跃华, 曹敏, 刘玉洪, 鲁志云, 谢有能. 云南哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林20 hm2动态样地的物种组成与群落结构[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(4): 419-429.
[12] 杨倩, 王娓, 曾辉. 氮添加对内蒙古退化草地植物群落多样性和生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(4): 430-441.
[13] 刘海跃, 李欣玫, 张琳琳, 王姣姣, 贺学礼. 西北荒漠带花棒根际丛枝菌根真菌生态地理分布[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(2): 252-260.
[14] 胡一鸣, 梁健超, 金崑, 丁志锋, 周智鑫, 胡慧建, 蒋志刚. 喜马拉雅山哺乳动物物种多样性垂直分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(2): 191-201.
[15] 商天其, 叶诺楠, 高海卿, 高洪娣, 伊力塔. 基于多元回归树的公益林群落结构解析[J]. 植物学报, 2018, 53(2): 238-249.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed