生物多样性 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (7): 774-780.doi: 10.17520/biods.2016205

• • 上一篇    下一篇


何强, 贾渝*()   

  1. 中国科学院植物研究所系统与进化植物学国家重点实验室, 北京 100093
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-28 接受日期:2017-07-10 出版日期:2017-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 贾渝 E-mail:yjia@ibcas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:具体评估过程包括信息汇总(各个渠道的标本信息、野外调查信息及文献资料)、逐条比对IUCN红色名录等级与标准、确定等级、填写评估说明。在具体评估过程中, 针对不同类群设计信息调查表, 通过电话和邮件向多位同行征询物种的居群信息。
  • 基金项目:

Assessing the threat status of China’s bryophytes

Qiang He, Yu Jia*()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093
  • Received:2017-04-28 Accepted:2017-07-10 Online:2017-07-20
  • Contact: Jia Yu E-mail:yjia@ibcas.ac.cn

本文阐述了中国苔藓植物濒危等级的评估原则。这一原则主要参考“IUCN物种红色名录濒危等级和标准(3.1版)”, 同时也吸收了其他苔藓学家的评估指南和结果。作者将10年内发表的新分类群暂评为数据缺乏(DD)等级, 根据馆藏标本份数估计栖息地物种成熟个体数。在此基础上, 对3,221个中国苔藓植物分类群进行评估, 结果为: 极危(CR) 16种; 濒危(EN) 58种; 易危(VU) 112种; 近危(NT) 214种; 无危(LC) 1,900种; 数据缺乏(DD) 921种。极危、濒危和易危等级的受威胁苔藓植物合计186种, 占中国苔藓植物种数的5.77%。

关键词: IUCN红色名录, 受威胁类群, 评估, 苔藓植物, 中国

In this paper, the assessment principles of the endangered categories of Chinese bryophytes are expanded. This principle mainly refer to “IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1”, and also include results from other bryologists. The authors propose that those taxa published in the past ten years temporarily be classified as Data Deficient (DD), and estimate population sizes for all taxa be made based on herbarium specimens. A total of 3,221 taxa of Chinese bryophytes were evaluated based on the above principles and methods. Sixteen species were identified as Critically Endangered (CR), 58 species as Endangered (EN), 112 species as Vulnerable (VU), 214 species as Near Threatened (NT), 1,900 species as of Least Concern (LC), and 921 species are classified as Data Deficient (DD). Overall, 186 species of bryophytes (5.77% of the bryophytes found in China) were identified as threatened (including CR, EN, and VU).

Key words: IUCN Red List, threatened taxa, assessment, bryophyte, China


红色名录中各等级占中国苔藓植物种数的比例。DD:数据缺乏; CR: 极危; EN: 濒危; VU: 易危; NT: 近危; LC: 无危。"

1 Brotherus VF (1929) Botanische Ergebnisse der Expedition der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien nach Sudwest-China In Symbolae Sinicae. 1914/1918. IV. Musci. (ed. Handel-Mazzetti H), pp.1-147. Julius Springer, Berlin.
2 Cao T, Zhu RL, Guo SL, Zuo BR, Yu J (2006) A brief report of the first red list of endangered bryophytes in China. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 26, 756-762. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[曹同, 朱瑞良, 郭水良, 左本荣, 于晶 (2006) 中国首批濒危苔藓植物红色名录简报. 植物研究, 26, 756-762.]
3 Cao T, Zhu RL, Tan BC, Guo SL, Gao C, Wu PC, Li XJ (2006) A report of the first national red list of Chinese endangered bryophytes. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 99, 275-295.
4 Chalaud G (1932) Germination des spores et phase protonemique. In: Manual of Bryology Chapt. IV (ed. Verdoorn F), pp. 89-108. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
5 Chen PC (1958) Preliminary report of the ecological and geographical study of Chinese mossflora. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 7, 271-293. (in Chinese)
[陈邦杰等(1958) 中国苔藓植物生态群落和地理分布的初步报告. 植物分类学报, 7, 271-293.]
6 Chen PC, Wu PC (1965) The preliminary study of the bryophytes of Mt. Hwangshan. In: Observations ad Florulam Hwangshanicam (eds Chen PC, Wu PC, Chiu PH, Hsu PS, Chow CL), pp. 1-59. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai. (in Chinese)
[陈邦杰, 吴鹏程 (1965) 黄山苔藓植物的初步研究. 见: 《黄山植物的研究》(陈邦杰, 吴鹏程, 裘佩熹, 徐炳声, 周纪纶著), 1-59页. 上海科学技术出版社, 上海.]
7 Church JM, Hodgetts NG, Preston CD, Stewart NF (2001) British Red Data Books: Mosses and Liverworts. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.
8 Doyle WT (1970) The Biology of Higher Cryptogams. Macmillan, New York, and Collier Macmillan, London.
9 Eckstein J, Döbbeler P (2007) Fungal spores within sporophytes of Gymnostomum viridulum. Journal of Bryology, 29, 169-173.
10 Fife AJ, Glenny D, Beever JE, Braggins JE, Brownsey PJ, Renner MAM, Hitchmough R (2010) New Zealand’s threatened bryophytes: conservation efforts. Phytotaxa, 9, 275-278.
11 Gao C ( ed.) (1994) Flora Bryophytorum Sinicorum, Vol. 1. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[高谦 (主编) (1994) 《中国苔藓志》第一卷. 科学出版社, 北京.]
12 Gao C, Cao T ( ed.) (2000) Flora Yunnanica, Tomus 17 ( Bryophyta : Hepaticae, Anthocerotae). Science Press, Beijing . (in Chinese)
[高谦, 曹同 (主编) (2000) 《云南植物志》17卷(苔藓植物: 苔纲、角苔纲) 科学出版社, 北京.]
13 Hallingbäck T, Hodgetts N, Raeymaekers G, Schumacker R, Sérgio, C, Söderström L, Stewart N, Vána (1998) Guidelines for application of the revised IUCN threat categories to bryophytes. Lindbergia, 23, 6-12.
14 Hallingbäck T, Hodgetts NG, Urmi E (1996) How to use the new IUCN Red List categories on bryophytes. Guidelines proposed by the IUCN SSC Bryophyte Specialist Group. Anales Del Instituto De Biología Serie Botánica, 67, 147.
15 Hasegawa J (1994a) A remarkable new species of Phaeoceros (Anthocerotae) with canaliculate-striate spore surfaces. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 75, 267-273.
16 Hasegawa J (1994b) New classification of Anthocerotae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 76, 21-34.
17 Hattori S (1947) Contributio ad Floram Hepaticarum Yakusimensem, II. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 2, 1-26.
18 Hattori S, Lin PJ (1985) A preliminary study of Chinese Frullania flora. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 59, 123-169.
19 IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1.IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK. [ii + 30 pp.]
20 IUCN (2010) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 8.0 (March2010). .
21 Jia Y (2017) Bryophytes In: Species Catalogue of China, Volume 1, Plants. A Provisional Checklist (Book one) (eds Wang LS, Jia Y, Zhang XC, Qin HN), Science Press, Beijing.
(in Chinese) (in press)[贾渝 (2017) 苔藓植物. (见: 中国生物物种名录第一卷植物总名录(上册). (王利松, 贾渝, 张宪春, 覃海宁主编). 科学出版社. 北京] (印刷中)
22 Jia Y, Xu JM (2006) A new species and a new record of Brotherella (Musci, Sematophyllaceae) from China, with a key to the Chinese species of Brotherella. Bryologist, 109, 579-585.
23 Li JY, Zhang L, Zhou LP (2011) Phylogenetic position of the genus Hattorioceros (Anthoceratophyta). Taxon, 11, 1-4
24 Liu Y, Jia Y, Wang W, Chen CZ, Davis EC, Qiu YL (2008) Phylogenetic relationships of two endemic genera from East Asia: Trichocoleopsis and Neotrichocolea (Hepaticae). Annual of Missouri Botanical Garden, 95, 463-474.
25 Müller C (1896-98) Bryologia Provinciae Schen-si Sinensis. I. Nuovo Giornale Botanico Italiano, n.s., 3, 89-129.
26 Roads E, Longton RE, Convey P (2014) Millennial timescale regeneration in a moss from Antarctica. Current Biology, 24, 222-223.
27 Shi XQ, Wu KM, Zhang XP (2009) Studies on liverwort flora in Huangshan Mountain. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 27, 368-273. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[师雪芹, 吴开明, 张小平 (2009) 黄山苔类植物区系研究. 武汉植物学研究, 27, 368-372. ]
28 Wang DH, Wang YF, Zuo Q, Li M, Wei QQ, Li XQ, Zhao MS (2013) Comparison of bryophyte diversity in West Tianmu Mountain from 1977 to 2011. Biodiversity Science, 21, 170-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[汪岱华, 王幼芳, 左勤, 李敏, 魏倩倩, 李晓芹, 赵明水 (2013) 浙江西天目山30年来苔藓物种多样性变化. 生物多样性, 21, 170-176.]
29 Zhang L, Zhou LP, Li JY (2011) The genus Hattorioceros (Notothyladaceae) new to China. The Bryologist, 114, 190-193.
30 Zhang XQ, Zhu RL, Huang ZS, ChenYT, Chen WW (2011) Liverworts and Hornworts of Fujian, China: An Updated Checklist and Bryofloristic Accounts. Plant Diversity, 33, 101-122. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[张晓青, 朱瑞良, 黄志森, 陈允泰, 陈文伟 (2011) 福建苔类和角苔类最新名录与区系分析. 植物分类与资源学报, 33, 101-122.]
31 Zhu RL, So ML, Ye LX (1998) A synopsis of the Hepaticae flora of Zhejiang, China. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 84, 159-174.
[1] 刘艳, 杨钰爽. 生物多样性保护优先区对重庆苔藓植物多样性保护的重要性[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(6): 677-682.
[2] 蒋凯文, 潘勃, 田斌. 近年来中国国产豆科的属级分类学变动[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(6): 689-697.
[3] 顾菡娇, 张参参, 汪金松, 施雪文, 夏瑞雪, 刘斌, 陈伏生, 卜文圣. 中国竹类植物基本形态学功能性状的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(6): 585-594.
[4] 肖治术,陈立军,宋相金,束祖飞,肖荣高,黄小群. 基于红外相机技术对广东车八岭国家级自然保护区大中型兽类与雉类的编目清查与评估[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(3): 237-242.
[5] 范靖宇, 李汉芃, 杨琢, 朱耿平. 基于本土最优模型模拟入侵物种水盾草在中国的潜在分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(2): 140-148.
[6] 陈作艺, 许晓静, 朱素英, 翟梦怡, 李扬. 中国沿海洛氏角毛藻复合群的多样性组成及地理分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(2): 149-158.
[7] 陈凡, 钱前, 王台, 董爱武, 漆小泉, 左建儒, 杨淑华, 林荣呈, 萧浪涛, 顾红雅, 陈之端, 姜里文, 白永飞, 孔宏智, 种康. 2017年中国植物科学若干领域重要研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2018, 53(4): 391-440.
[8] 孙元丰, 万宏伟, 赵玉金, 陈世苹, 白永飞. 中国草地生态系统根系周转的空间格局和驱动因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 337-348.
[9] 宋瑞玲, 王昊, 张迪, 吕植, 朱子云, 张璐, 刘炎林, 才文公保, 吴岚. 基于MODIS-EVI评估三江源高寒草地的保护成效[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(2): 149-157.
[10] 刘冬梅, 薛达元, 蔡蕾, 李俊生, 肖能文. 中国生物多样性相关传统知识调查与评估指标体系构建[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(12): 1350-1357.
[11] 付瑞玉, 苏宏新, 张忠华, 胡刚. 中国森林生物多样性监测网络(CForBio)的研究态势与热点: 基于文献计量分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(12): 1255-1267.
[12] 刘冬梅, 蔡蕾, 王科, 李俊生, 魏铁铮, 姚一建. 中国野生大型真菌受威胁程度评估、问题和对策[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(11): 1236-1242.
[13] 苟小林, 周青平, 陈有军, 魏小星, 涂卫国. 青藏高原不同气候区高寒沙地两种优势植物及其根际土壤的养分特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(1): 133-142.
[14] 张敬怀, 高阳, 时小军, 吕向立. 大亚湾底拖网海洋生物种类组成及物种多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(9): 1019-1030.
[15] 叶俊伟, 张阳, 王晓娟. 中国-日本植物区系中的谱系地理间断及其形成机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(9): 1003-1019.
Full text