Relationship between ecological space and ecological conservation redline from the perspective of management requirements

doi:10.17520/biods.2021441

Abstract

Abstract:

Background and Aims: In the context of territorial spatial planning, the ecological conservation redline is the management requirements on ecological space. However, whether the requirements of the ecological conservation redline are compatible with that of various ecological spaces, and how to coordinate them, still require further study.

Methods: This study constructed a classification system of the ecological space with “two attributes and three levels”, which are natural and managerial attributes, and macro, meso, and micro levels. From the management requirements perspective, the research focuses on the relationship analysis between 13 types of ecological space and the ecological conservation redline around the three aspects of management objectives, management content, and management intensity.

Results: In terms of management objectives, supporting objectives and regulating objectives are highly compatible, while provisioning objectives and cultural objectives are quite different. In terms of management content, the differences are mainly in the nurture restoration and artificial utilization. In terms of management intensity, the two-level system of the ecological conservation redline and the three-level system of ecological space do not completely match.

Recommendation: It is recommended to improve the ecological space classification with a system of “two attributes and three levels”. The management requirements of ecological space should be systematically constructed from three aspects: management objective, management content and management intensity. The management content and intensity of the ecological conservation redline should be further improved to better coordinate with the various ecological spaces.

Key words: territorial spatial planning, ecological space, ecological conservation redline, protected area, management objective, management content, management intensity

Shujie Zhang, Youbo Zhuang. Relationship between ecological space and ecological conservation redline from the perspective of management requirements[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(4): 21441.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/EN/10.17520/biods.2021441

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/EN/Y2022/V30/I4/21441

Figures/Tables 4

Fig. 1 Construction of classification system of ecological space. For simplicity, the scenic area refers to natural type, and natural and cultural mixed type in this study. In addition to the types of ecological space in the figure, the key ecological function areas (flood regulation area, drinking water storage and purification, key fishery area, and channels sustaining area) (Wang, 2008) and ecological corridors (Zheng et al, 2019) had been discussed. Due to the lack of unified policies, management institutions and management norms for these types of ecological space, they are not included in this study.①(①周婷婷 (2016) 典型洪水调蓄区生态保护红线及其生态服务辐射效应研究. 硕士学位论文, 内蒙古大学, 呼和浩特.)

Table 1 The analysis of management objectives, content and intensity of 13 types of ecological space

Table 2 Analysis of management objectives, management content and management intensity of ecological conservation redline

Fig. 2 Quantitative analysis on the differences of management objectives (A), management content (B), management intensity (C) between and 13 types of ecological space ecological conservation redline. Management objectives (A): A positive value means that the management target level of the ecological space is higher than the ecological conservation redline; a negative value means lower; the absolute value represents the degree of difference, the difference between the main target and the additional target is 1 point, the difference between the additional target and the compatible target is 1 point, and so on; if no target appears, it means that the management target level is consistent with the ecological space and the ecological conservation redline. Details are in Appendix 2. Management content (B): A positive value represents the management content that is specified in the ecological space but not specified in the ecological conservation redline; a negative value represents the management content that is not specified in the ecological space but specified in the ecological conservation redline; the part that does not appear represents that the management content of the ecological space is consistent with the ecological conservation redline. Details are in Appendix 3. Management intensity (C): A positive value means that the management intensity of ecological space is higher than the ecological conservation redline; a negative value means lower; the greater the absolute value, the greater the degree of difference. The part that does not appear represents that the management intensity of the ecological space is consistent with the ecological conservation redline. Details are in Appendix 3.

References 16

[1]	Gao JX, Xu DL, Qiao Q, Zou CX, Wang Y, Tian MR, Wang Y (2020) Pattern construction of natural ecological space and planning theory exploration. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40, 749-755. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 高吉喜, 徐德琳, 乔青, 邹长新, 王燕, 田美荣, 王玥 (2020) 自然生态空间格局构建与规划理论研究. 生态学报, 40, 749-755.]
[2]	Gao JX, Zou CX, Chen SB (2013) Concept, connotation and type division of ecological red line. China Ecological Civilization, (1), 46-48. (in Chinese)
	[ 高吉喜, 邹长新, 陈圣宾 (2013) 论生态红线的概念、内涵与类型划分. 中国生态文明, (1), 46-48.]
[3]	Gao YL, Cai YM (2018) Building a natural ecological space protection system in the new era. China Land, (4), 5-8. (in Chinese)
	[ 高延利, 蔡玉梅 (2018) 构建新时代的自然生态空间保护体系. 中国土地, (4), 5-8.]
[4]	Huang PX (2016) Only by protecting the ecology, Wuyi Tea can be more mellow. Tourism Overview, (8), 247. (in Chinese)
	[ 黄培兴 (2016) 只有保护好生态, 武夷茶才更醇厚. 旅游纵览(下半月), (8), 247.]
[5]	Liu C, Cui WL, Zhu ZT, Ye F, Yu XJ (2018) Study on the technical methods of the delineation of island ecological red lines. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 8564-8573. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 刘超, 崔旺来, 朱正涛, 叶芳, 俞仙炯 (2018) 海岛生态保护红线划定技术方法. 生态学报, 38, 8564-8573.]
[6]	Liu YG, Li JJ, Lu YF, Zou Q, Wang Y, Zhou WZ, Luo ZY, Li YF (2021) Optimization method of ecological redline delineation in Southwest China from the view of eco-geo environment vulnerability assessment. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 5825-5836. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 刘延国, 李景吉, 逯亚峰, 邹强, 王勇, 周吾珍, 罗正宇, 李怡飞 (2021) 西南山区生态保护红线划定方法优化--基于生态地质环境脆弱性评估. 生态学报, 41, 5825-5836.]
[7]	Lu J (2020) Study on the relationship between forest land management and ecological red line management measures. East China Forest Management, 34, 66-68. (in Chinese)
	[ 卢佶 (2020) 林地管理与生态保护红线管控措施关系研究. 华东森林经理, 34, 66-68.]
[8]	Qin WH, Qiu QW, Zhang Y, Shen XX (2010) Experiences of management and conservation in Hong Kong’s Maipo Nature Reserve. Wetland Science & Management, 6, 34-37. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 秦卫华, 邱启文, 张晔, 沈兴兴 (2010) 香港米埔自然保护区的管理和保护经验. 湿地科学与管理, 6, 34-37.]
[9]	Wang XC, Xia X, Lei X (2020) Ecological space control of Dianchi Lake Basin based on ecological protection redline. Economic Geography, 40, 191-197. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王筱春, 夏雪, 雷轩 (2020) 基于生态保护红线的滇池流域生态空间管控. 经济地理, 40, 191-197.]
[10]	Wang YH (2008) Research on zoning of key ecological function reserve areas in Jiangsu Province. PhD dissertation, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王玉华 (2008) 江苏省重要生态功能保护区区划研究. 博士学位论文, 南京林业大学, 南京.]
[11]	Wang YL, Zhao ZC (2020) Study on relationship between protected areas and ecological protection redlines. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 36, 20-24. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王应临, 赵智聪 (2020) 自然保护地与生态保护红线关系研究. 中国园林, 36, 20-24.]
[12]	Xie GD, Zhang CX, Zhang CS, Xiao Y, Lu CX (2015) The value of ecosystem services in China. Resources Science, 37, 1740-1746. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 肖玉, 鲁春霞 (2015) 中国生态系统服务的价值. 资源科学, 37, 1740-1746.]
[13]	Xu J, Wu XY, Li WL (2021) Ecological conservation redline zoning at the regional scale: A case study of northwest China. Pratacultural Science, 38, 1218-1230. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 许静, 吴鑫悦, 李文龙 (2021) 区域尺度生态保护红线分区研究: 以我国西北地区为例. 草业科学, 38, 1218-1230.]
[14]	Zhang HB, Yu Z, Shao HS (2018) Construction of classification system and identification of ecological spatial based on multi-sources data. China Land Science, 32, 24-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张合兵, 于壮, 邵河顺 (2018) 基于多源数据的自然生态空间分类体系构建及其识别. 中国土地科学, 32, 24-33.]
[15]	Zhang Z, Ding CQ (2008) The in situ conservation of created Ibis and relate research progress. Science & Technology Review, 26, 48-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张智, 丁长青 (2008) 中国朱鹮就地保护与研究进展. 科技导报, 26, 48-53.]
[16]	Zheng H, Gao JX, Xie GD, Zou CX, Jin Y (2019) Ecological corridor. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 35, 137-144. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 郑好, 高吉喜, 谢高地, 邹长新, 金宇 (2019) 生态廊道. 生态与农村环境学报, 35, 137-144.]