黄河三角洲湿地生态修复区大型底栖动物群落结构与生态健康评价

doi:10.17520/biods.2023303

生物多样性 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 23303. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023303

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

黄河三角洲湿地生态修复区大型底栖动物群落结构与生态健康评价

倪艳梅¹, 陈莉², 董志远², 孙德斌², 李宝泉^2,3, 王绪敏¹, 陈琳琳^2,3*

1. 烟台大学生命科学学院, 山东烟台 264003;
2. 中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所海岸带生物学与生物资源保护实验室, 山东烟台 264003;
3. 中国科学院海岸带环境过程与生态修复重点实验室(烟台海岸带研究所), 山东烟台 264003

收稿日期:2023-08-29 修回日期:2024-01-04 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2024-02-27
通讯作者: 陈琳琳

Community structure and ecological health evaluation of macrobenthos in the restoration area of the Yellow River Delta wetland

Yanmei Ni¹, Li Chen², Zhiyuan Dong², Debin Sun², Baoquan Li^2,3, Xumin Wang¹, Linlin Chen^2,3*

1 School of Life Sciences, Yantai University, Yantai, Shandong 264003
2 Key Laboratory of Coastal Biology and Bioresource Utilization, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, Shandong 264003
3 Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Environmental Process and Ecological Restoration, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Yantai Coastal Zone Research Institute), Yantai, Shandong 264003

Received:2023-08-29 Revised:2024-01-04 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-02-27
Contact: Linlin Chen

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 黄河三角洲国际重要湿地生物多样性保护工程于2019年动工, 本研究基于修复区内大型底栖动物群落组成特点及其与环境因子的相关关系, 分析大型底栖动物群落恢复特征, 了解该地区的生态系统健康状况, 评估保护工程实施三年后修复区湿地生态系统演替阶段及修复效果。结果表明: 2022年春、夏、秋三季共采集到大型底栖动物16种, 隶属于5门6纲15科, 昆虫纲动物在物种组成中占据优势地位; 大型底栖动物密度和生物多样性指数的时空差异均不显著(P > 0.05); 大型底栖动物生物量存在显著的季节差异, 表现为秋季(11.56 g/m²) > 夏季(7.81 g/m²) > 春季(7.59 g/m²), 秋季与春季和夏季间均存在显著差异(P < 0.05), 空间差异不显著(P > 0.05)。与环境因子的相关性分析结果显示, 物种密度与电导率、盐度、总碳、铵盐和亚硝酸盐等指标显著相关(P < 0.01)。快速生物综合评价指数评定修复区为“亚健康”状态。本研究通过对黄河三角洲湿地修复区大型底栖动物群落特征以及生态健康评价的分析, 为修复区底栖动物群落的演替规律研究提供基础数据和科学依据, 为后续湿地修复工程的实施和管理提供指导和参考, 对于黄河三角洲生物多样性的保护具有重要意义。

关键词: 关键词：黄河三角洲, 生态修复, 大型底栖动物, 快速生物评价, 群落结构

Abstract

Aims: The internationally important wetland biodiversity conservation project of the Yellow River Delta started in 2019. This study used macrobenthos community characteristics and their relationship with environmental factors to understand the health status of this ecosystem and assess the succession stage and repair effect after three years of restoration.

Method: This study investigated the macrobenthos and environmental factors in the restoration area in May, August and October in 2022, respectively. The community structure, biodiversity, and their relationships with major environmental factors were analyzed by classical taxonomy, biodiversity index, cluster analysis, MDS analysis, and Spearman correlation analysis.

Results: A total of 16 macrobenthic species belonging to 5 phyla, 6 classes and 15 families were collected in spring, summer and autumn. Insecta species were found dominant in species composition. The number of macrobenthic species in the Yellow River Delta wetland restoration area showed an increasing trend during the survey period, with chironomid larvae, elliptical radish snails, and pointed mouth round flat snails becoming the dominant species in the area, as well as key characteristic and differential species in the community structure. The species density was significantly correlated with indicators such as specific conductance, salinity, total carbon, ammonium nitrogen, and nitrite nitrogen (P < 0.01). The rapid biological comprehensive evaluation index evaluated the restoration area as the “sub-health” state.

Conclusion: The restoration area is developing towards a healthier and more orderly direction but is currently in a “sub healthy” state, indicating a need for continued restoration work. Ecological succession is a slow process which requires long-term ecological monitoring in our research area, including an analysis of the reconstruction process of the disturbed macrobenthic community structure in the Yellow River Delta ecological restoration area, and an exploration of the regular changes in ecological succession.

Key words: Key words: the Yellow River Delta, ecological restoration, macrobenthos, rapid biological evaluation, community structure

倪艳梅, 陈莉, 董志远, 孙德斌, 李宝泉, 王绪敏, 陈琳琳 (2024) 黄河三角洲湿地生态修复区大型底栖动物群落结构与生态健康评价. 生物多样性, 32, 23303. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023303.

Yanmei Ni, Li Chen, Zhiyuan Dong, Debin Sun, Baoquan Li, Xumin Wang, Linlin Chen (2024) Community structure and ecological health evaluation of macrobenthos in the restoration area of the Yellow River Delta wetland. Biodiversity Science, 32, 23303. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023303.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2023303

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2024/V32/I3/23303

[1]	刘啸林, 吴友贵, 张敏华, 陈小荣, 朱志成, 陈定云, 董舒, 李步杭, 丁炳扬, 刘宇. 浙江百山祖25 ha亚热带森林动态监测样地群落组成与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23294-.
[2]	杨舒涵, 王贺, 陈磊, 廖蓥飞, 严光, 伍一宁, 邹红菲. 松嫩平原异质生境对土壤线虫群落特征的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23295-.
[3]	冯尔辉, 梁伟诺, 胡亮, 张旭. 海南东寨港国家级自然保护区潮间带蟹类(十足目: 短尾下目)物种多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23030-.
[4]	梁伟诺, 张旭, 胡亮. 广东东海岛与硇洲岛潮间带蟹类(十足目: 短尾下目)物种多样性及其地理分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23086-.
[5]	张多鹏, 刘洋, 李正飞, 葛奕豪, 张君倩, 谢志才. 长江上游支流赤水河流域底栖动物物种多样性与保护对策[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 22674-.
[6]	刘彩莲, 许庆, 王林龙, 邢衍阔, 宋稼豪, 林柏岸, 康斌, 刘敏. 闽东近海春秋季游泳动物多样性、密度及群落特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22635-.
[7]	朱晓华, 高程, 王聪, 赵鹏. 尿素对土壤细菌与真菌多样性影响的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22636-.
[8]	毛莹儿, 周秀梅, 王楠, 李秀秀, 尤育克, 白尚斌. 毛竹扩张对杉木林土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22659-.
[9]	赵秋杰, 郭辉军, 孟广涛, 钟明川, 尹俊, 刘倬橙, 李品荣, 陈力, 陶毅, 秋生, 王红, 赵延会. 放牧对蜜蜂的影响及其生态修复建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 23037-.
[10]	陈哲涵, 尹进, 叶吉, 刘冬伟, 毛子昆, 房帅, 蔺菲, 王绪高. 增温对东北温带次生林草本群落季节动态的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 23059-.
[11]	张鹤露, 赵美红, 孙世春, 刘晓收. 西藏那曲市高原盐湖自由生活线虫群落多样性与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22533-.
[12]	魏庐潞, 徐婷婷, 李媛媛, 艾喆, 马飞. 同质园环境和遗传分化影响锦鸡儿属植物根际土壤固氮菌多样性和群落结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22477-.
[13]	林魏巍, 田呈明, 熊典广, 刘伟航, 热依汗古丽·斯地克, 梁英梅. 新疆杨树人工林中蜘蛛群落多样性及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22493-.
[14]	赵雯, 王丹丹, 热依拉·木民, 黄开钏, 刘顺, 崔宝凯. 阿尔山地区兴安落叶松林土壤微生物群落结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22258-.
[15]	张伟, 翟东东, 熊飞, 刘红艳, 陈元元, 王莹, 廖传松, 段辛斌, 田辉伍, 邓华堂, 陈大庆. 三峡库区鱼类群落结构和功能多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22136-.

黄河三角洲湿地生态修复区大型底栖动物群落结构与生态健康评价

Community structure and ecological health evaluation of macrobenthos in the restoration area of the Yellow River Delta wetland

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价