紫茎泽兰入侵对土壤细菌的群落组成和多样性的影响

doi:10.17520/biods.2014158

生物多样性 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 665-672. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2014158

所属专题：生物多样性与生态系统功能；土壤生物与土壤健康；生物入侵

紫茎泽兰入侵对土壤细菌的群落组成和多样性的影响

朱珣之^1,², 李强¹, 李扬苹³, 韩洪波⁴, 马克平^2,^*()

1 江苏科技大学生物技术学院, 江苏镇江 212018
2 中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093
3 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园热带森林生态重点实验室, 云南昆明 650223
4 攀枝花学院生物与化学工程学院, 四川攀枝花 617000

收稿日期:2015-02-03 接受日期:2015-04-18 出版日期:2015-09-20 发布日期:2015-10-12
通讯作者: 马克平
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(31300466;31100410)和江苏省自然科学基金青年项目(BK20130461)

Eupatorium adenophorum invasion alters soil bacterial community and diversity

Xunzhi Zhu^1,², Qiang Li¹, Yangping Li³, Hongbo Han⁴, Keping Ma^2,^*()

1 College of Biotechnology, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212018
2 State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093
3 Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223
4 School of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, Sichuan 617000

Received:2015-02-03 Accepted:2015-04-18 Online:2015-09-20 Published:2015-10-12
Contact: Ma Keping

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

外来生物入侵可能对生物群落结构和生态系统功能产生多种影响, 但入侵植物与土壤微生物群落组成和多样性的关系尚不清楚。为了揭示外来植物紫茎泽兰(Eupatorium adenophorum)入侵对土壤化学性质和细菌群落组成及多样性的影响, 本研究利用第二代高通量测序技术, 比较了紫茎泽兰不同入侵程度的生境(本地植物群落、紫茎泽兰与本地植物混生群落、紫茎泽兰单优群落)土壤中细菌群落的差异。土壤化学性质分析表明, 土壤pH值、有机质、全N和全K随着紫茎泽兰的入侵而逐渐降低, 而土壤全P则在入侵程度最高的生境土壤中最高。通过测序共获得7,755个细菌OUT (operational taxonomic unit)。结果表明, 紫茎泽兰入侵对土壤的细菌多样性影响较小, ACE和Chao指数在3种不同生境间的差异不显著。细菌在紫茎泽兰与本地植物混生群落中的Shannon指数最低, 即细菌的多样性在中等入侵程度的生境最低。此外, 紫茎泽兰入侵改变了土壤细菌组成和结构, 酸杆菌门(Acidobacteria)和疣微菌门(Verrucomicrobia)的相对丰度, 从本地植物群落、混合群落到紫茎泽兰单优群落, 呈现出先增加后减少的趋势。可见, 紫茎泽兰入侵一定程度上改变了土壤微生物的多样性和群落结构, 并改变了土壤的化学性质。

关键词: 植物入侵, Eupatorium adenophorum, 高通量测序, 土壤细菌, 生物多样性

Abstract

The invasion of alien species can affect biological community structure and ecosystem functioning, but the relationships between invasive plants and soil microbial composition and diversity are still unclear. In order to examine the effect of the invasion of an exotic plant Eupatorium adenophorum on soil chemical properties and microbial community structure and diversity, we compared the differences in soil microbial community of three communities with different densities of E. adenophorum (native plant community, E. adenophorum and native plant mixed community, and E. adenophorum dominated community) by high-throughput sequencing. Analysis of soil chemical properties showed that soil pH, organic matter, total nitrogen and total potassium decreased with increasing invasion of E. adenophorum. However, total phosphorus was highest in the most heavily invaded soil. The high-throughput sequencing results showed that there were 7,755 soil microbial OTUs (operational taxonomic unit) in total. The invasion of E. adenophorum did not exert heavy impacts on soil microbial diversity. ACE index and Chao index showed no significant differences among the three different communities. However, soil microbial diversity of the mixed community of E. adenophorum and native plant species showed the lowest Shanonn index. The relative abundances of Acidobacteria and Verrucomicrobia in the medium invaded community were the highest. In sum, the invasion of E. adenophorum altered the diversity and structure of soil microbial communities, and changed the soil chemical properties.

Key words: plant invasion, Eupatorium adenophorum, high throughput sequencing, soil bacteria, biodiversity

朱珣之, 李强, 李扬苹, 韩洪波, 马克平 (2015) 紫茎泽兰入侵对土壤细菌的群落组成和多样性的影响. 生物多样性, 23, 665-672. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2014158.

Xunzhi Zhu, Qiang Li, Yangping Li, Hongbo Han, Keping Ma (2015) Eupatorium adenophorum invasion alters soil bacterial community and diversity. Biodiversity Science, 23, 665-672. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2014158.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2014158

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2015/V23/I5/665

图/表 5

表1 各样地的土壤化学性质比较。其中样品符号E、D和R分别表示本地植物群落、紫茎泽兰与本地植物混生群落和紫茎泽兰单优群落; 图中数字表示平均值±标准误; 不同字母表示不同土壤该指标差异显著(P <0.05, LSD test)

Table 1 The chemical properties of soil in different sites. E, D, R represent samples from native plant community, Eupatorium adenophorum and native plant mixed community, and E. adenophorum dominated community. Values (mean ± SE) followed by different letters in the same column indicate significant difference at P <0.05 level.

样品 Sample	pH	全N Total N (%)	有机质 Organic matter (%)	全P Total P (mg/kg)	全K Total K (%)
E	6.03±0.19^a	0.337±0.131^a	7.93±3.06^a	1,256.75±249.93^a	1.76±0.08^a
D	5.67±0.26^ac	0.256±0.026^a	6.58±0.86^a	747.00±24.76^a	1.42±0.13^b
R	5.18±0.10^bc	0.250±0.069^a	5.25±1.60^a	5,659.00±615.13^b	0.62±0.08^c

图1 样品在遗传距离0.03下的α丰富度。其中样品符号的字母E、D和R分别表示本地植物群落、紫茎泽兰与本地植物混生群落和紫茎泽兰单优群落。

Fig. 1 Alpha diversity for different samples obtained at genetic distances of 0.03. The letters E, D, R represent samples from native plant community, Eupatorium adenophorum and native plants mixed habitat, and E. adenophorum dominated habitat.

图2 样品在遗传距离0.03下的稀疏曲线

Fig. 2 The rarefaction of different samples obtained at the genetic distances of 0.03

图3 不同分类水平的细菌群落组成。(A)门; (B)目; (C)属。图C中, 不同颜色代表细菌的相对丰度。D1-D4为紫茎泽兰与本地植物混生群落的土壤, E1-E4为本地植物群落的土壤, R1-R4为紫茎泽兰单优群落的土壤。

Fig. 3 Composition of the bacterial community at different taxonomic levels. (A) Phylum; (B) Order; (C) Genus. In (C), different colors represent relative abundances of bacteria. D1-D4 are soils from Eupatorium adenophorum and native plant mixed community; E1-E4 are soils from native plant community; R1-R4 are from communities dominated by E. adenophorum.

图4 基于OTU数据的不同土壤细菌群落的主成分分析

Fig. 4 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of all microbial communities base on OTU data

参考文献 21

[1]	Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapfel C (2000) Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants.Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 3, 52-66.
[2]	Amato KR, Yeoman CJ, Kent A, Righini N, Carbonero F, Estrada A, Gaskins HR, Stumpf RM, Yildirim S, Torralba M, Gillis M, Wilson BA, Nelson KE, White BA, Leigh SR (2013) Habitat degradation impacts black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) gastrointestinal microbiomes.The ISME Journal, 7, 1344-1353.
[3]	Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A, Holben WE (2004) Soil biota and exotic plant invasion.Nature, 427, 731-733.
[4]	Ellis RJ, Morgan P, Weightman AJ, Fry JC (2003) Cultivation-dependent and -independent approaches for determining bacterial diversity in heavy-metal contaminated soil.Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 3223-3230.
[5]	Inderjit, van der Putten WH (2010) Impacts of soil microbial communities on exotic plant invasions.Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 512-519.
[6]	Kemp PF, Aller JY (2004) Bacterial diversity in aquatic and other environments: what 16S rDNA libraries can tell us.FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 47, 161-177.
[7]	Keylock CJ (2005) Simpson diversity and the Shannon-Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy.Oikos, 109, 203-207.
[8]	Li HN (李会娜), Liu WX (刘万学), Dai L (戴莲), Wan FH (万方浩), Cao YY (曹远银) (2009) Invasive impacts of Ageratina adenophora (Asteraceae) on the changes of microbial community structure, enzyme activity and fertility in soil ecosystem.Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学), 42, 3964-3971. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility.Ecology, 80, 1522-1536.
[10]	Lu P (鲁萍), Sang WG (桑卫国), Ma KP (马克平) (2005) Progress and prospects in research of an exotic invasive species, Eupatorium adenophorum. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica(植物生态学报), 29, 1029-1037. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Lu ZJ, Ma KP (2005) Scale dependent relationships between native plant diversity and the invasion of croftonweed (Eupatorium adenophorum) in southwest China. Weed Science, 53, 600-604.
[12]	Mack RN, Simberloff D, Londale WM (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control.Ecological Applications, 10, 689-710.
[13]	Niu HB (牛红榜), Liu WX (刘万学), Wan FH (万方浩) (2007) Invasive effects of Ageratina adenophora Sprengel (Asteraceae) on soil microbial community and physical and chemical properties.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 27, 3051-3060. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	Niu HB, Liu WX, Wan FH, Liu B (2007) An invasive aster (Ageratina adenophora) invades and dominates forest understories in China: altered soil microbial communities facilitate the invader and inhibit natives.Plant and Soil, 294, 73-85.
[15]	Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools.Nucleic Acids Research, 41, 590-596.
[16]	Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL (2011) Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies.PLoS ONE, 6, e27310.
[17]	Teixeira LCRS, Peixoto RS, Cury JC, Sul WJ, Pellizari VH, Tiedje J, Rosado AS (2010) Bacterial diversity in rhizosphere soil from Antarctic vascular plants of Admiralty Bay, maritime Antarctica.The ISME Journal, 4, 989-1001.
[18]	Urich T, Lanzen A, Qi J, Huson DH, Schleper C, Schuster SC (2008) Simultaneous assessment of soil microbial community structure and function through analysis of the meta-transcriptome.PLoS ONE, 3, e2527.
[19]	Wu H (吴昊), Ding JQ (丁建清) (2014) Recent progress in invasion ecology.Chinese Science Bulletin(科学通报), 59, 438-448. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Yu WQ (于文清), Liu WX (刘万学), Gui FR (桂富荣), Liu WZ (刘文志), Wan FH (万方浩), Zhang LL (张利莉) (2012) Invasion of exotic Ageratina adenophora Sprengel. alters soil physical and chemical characteristics and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus community.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 32, 7027-7035. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	Yu XJ, Yu D, Lu ZJ, Ma KP (2005) A new mechanism of invader success: exotic plant inhibits natural vegetation restoration by changing soil microbe community.Chinese Science Bulletin, 50, 1105-1112.

紫茎泽兰入侵对土壤细菌的群落组成和多样性的影响

Eupatorium adenophorum invasion alters soil bacterial community and diversity

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姜熠辉, 刘岳, 曾旭, 林喆滢, 王楠, 彭吉豪, 曹玲, 曾聪. 东海六个国家级海洋保护区鱼类多样性和连通性[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24128-.
[2]	田瑜, 李俊生. 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》“3030”目标的内涵及实现路径分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24086-.
[3]	连佳丽, 陈婧, 杨雪琴, 赵莹, 罗叙, 韩翠, 赵雅欣, 李建平. 荒漠草原植物多样性和微生物多样性对降水变化的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24044-.
[4]	马碧玉. 印度《生物多样性法》修订述要及对我国完善生物多样性保护法制的启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23412-.
[5]	蔡颖莉, 朱洪革, 李家欣. 中国生物多样性保护政策演进、主要措施与发展趋势[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23386-.
[6]	艾妍雨, 胡海霞, 沈婷, 莫雨轩, 杞金华, 宋亮. 附生维管植物多样性及其与宿主特征的相关性: 以哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 24072-.
[7]	鄢德奎. 中国生物多样性保护政策的共同要素、不足和优化建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23293-.
[8]	赵富伟, 李颖硕, 陈慧. 新时期我国生物多样性法制建设思考[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 24027-.
[9]	刘荆州, 钱易鑫, 张燕雪丹, 崔凤. 基于潜在迪利克雷分布(LDA)模型的旗舰物种范式研究进展与启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23439-.
[10]	吴乐婕, 刘泽康, 田星, 张群, 李博, 吴纪华. 海三棱藨草基因型多样性对种群营养生长和繁殖策略的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23478-.
[11]	李雪萌, 蒋际宝, 张曾鲁, 刘晓静, 王亚利, 吴宜钊, 李银生, 邱江平, 赵琦. 宝天曼国家级自然保护区蚯蚓物种多样性及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23352-.
[12]	郝操, 吴东辉, 莫凌梓, 徐国良. 越冬动物肠道微生物多样性及功能研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23407-.
[13]	刘海鸥, 杜乐山, 刘文慧, 李子圆, 潘丽波, 刘蕾. 全球生物多样性框架基金管理政策分析与启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23334-.
[14]	魏嘉欣, 姜治国, 杨林森, 熊欢欢, 金胶胶, 罗方林, 李杰华, 吴浩, 徐耀粘, 乔秀娟, 魏新增, 姚辉, 余辉亮, 杨敬元, 江明喜. 湖北神农架中亚热带山地落叶阔叶林25 ha动态监测样地群落物种组成与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23338-.
[15]	何智荣, 吴思雨, 时莹莹, 王雨婷, 江艺欣, 张春娜, 赵娜, 王苏盆. 壶菌感染对两栖动物种群影响的研究现状与挑战[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23274-.