基于标本信息初评囊瓣芹属六个种的绝灭风险

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.08059

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用标本馆的标本信息, 根据物种分布区、占有面积、亚居群数及分布点数目等量化参数, 按照IUCN濒危等级和标准, 对囊瓣芹属(Pternopetalum) 6个种的受威胁程度进行了评估。结果表明: 薄叶囊瓣芹(P. leptophyllum)为极危, 川鄂囊瓣芹(P. rosthornii)为濒危, 东亚囊瓣芹(P. tanakae)、五匹青(P. vulgare)、洱源囊瓣芹(P. molle)和澜沧囊瓣芹(P. delavayi)为易危。在涉及大的空间范围和大量物种的评估实践中, 标本数据是最重要, 有时甚至是唯一的获取量化参数的依据, 但标本数据自身局限性造成的量化参数估计偏差对评估的影响还需要更深入的研究。

关键词: IUCN, 保护生物学, 伞形科, 囊瓣芹属, 中国

Abstract

Based on parameters established by the IUCN red list, including extent of occurrence, area of occupancy, numbers of subpopulations and location, we investigated the extinction risk of six species from the genus Pternopetalum. Our results indicated that the six species are threatened; P. leptophyllum is critical endangered, P. rosthornii is endangered, and P. tanakae, P. vulgare, P. molle and P. delavayi are vulnerable. For IUCN red list assessment, herbarium specimens are most important, sometimes an only data source, in getting quantitative parameters. It is practically an irreplaceable data source when assessment activity covering large scale area and huge species number. However, herbarium specimen bear with innate bias in estimating quantitative parameters, which resulted effect for assessment need further study.

Key words: Apiaceae, China, IUCN Red List, conservation biology, Pternopetalum

王利松, 赵莉娜, 覃海宁 (2012) 基于标本信息初评囊瓣芹属六个种的绝灭风险. 生物多样性, 20, 761-768. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.08059.

Lisong Wang*, Lina Zhao, Haining Qin (2012) A preliminary assessment of extinction risk from six species in the genus Pternopetalum based on herbarium specimen data. Biodiversity Science, 20, 761-768. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.08059.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.08059

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2012/V20/I6/761

图/表 3

参考文献 54

[1]	Arroyo TPF, Olson ME, GarcíA-Mendoza A, Solano E (2009) A GIS-based comparison of the Mexican national and IUCN methods for determining extinction risk. Conservation Biology, 23, 1156-1166.
[2]	Beaman RS, Conn BJ (2003) Automated geoparsing and georeferencing of Malesian collection locality data. Telopea, 10, 43-52.
[3]	Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Baillie J, Bennun LA, Stuart SN, Akçakaya HR, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM (2005) Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 360, 255-268.
[4]	Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Bennun LA, Shutes SM, Akçakaya HR, Baillie JEM, Stuart SN, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM (2004) Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: Red List Indices for birds. PLoS Biology, 2, 2383.
[5]	Callmander MW, Schatz GE, Lowry II PP, Laivao MO, Raharimampionona J, Andriambololonera S, Raminosoa T, Consiglio TK (2007) Identification of priority areas for plant conservation in Madagascar using Red List Criteria: rare and threatened Pandanaceae indicate sites in need of protection. Oryx, 41, 168-176.
[6]	Callmander MW, Schatz GE, Lowry PP (2005) IUCN Red List assessment and the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation: taxonomists must act now. Taxon, 54, 1047-1050.
[7]	Chen YJ (陈元君), Chen JW (陈建伟), Lei T (雷霆) (2008) A comparative study on endangered seed plant species between China and Japan. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 16, 255-262. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	Cheng KW (成克武), Zang RG (臧润国) (2004) Advances in species endangerment assessment. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 12, 534-540. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	de Grammont PC, Cuarón AD (2006) An evaluation of threatened species categorization systems used on the American continent. Conservation Biology, 20, 14-27.
[10]	Garcillán PP, Ezcurra E (2011) Sampling procedures and species estimation: testing the effectiveness of herbarium data against vegetation sampling in an oceanic island. Journal of Vegetation Science, 22, 273-280.
[11]	Gärdenfors U (2001) Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 511-516.
[12]	Golding JS, Bandeira SO (2002) Southern African Plant Red Data Lists. SABONET, Pretoria.
[13]	Golding JS, Timberlake J (2003) How taxonomists can bridge the gap between taxonomy and conservation science. Conservation Biology, 17, 1177-1178.
[14]	Good TC, Zjhra ML, Kremen C (2006) Addressing data deficiency in classifying extinction risk: a case study of a radiation of Bignoniaceae from Madagascar. Conservation Biology, 20, 1099-1110. URL PMID
[15]	Graham CH, Ferrier S, Huettman F, Moritz C, Peterson AT (2004) New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 497-503. DOI URL PMID
[16]	GSPC (2003) Convention on Biological Diversity: Conference of the Parties 7, Decision VI/9: Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. http://www.biodiv.org/decisions/default.asp?dec=VI/9. (Accessed 1 Sep. 2005)
[17]	Hernández H, Navarro M (2007) A new method to estimate areas of occupancy using herbarium data. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 2457-2470.
[18]	Hoffmann M, Brooks TM, Fonseca GAB, Gascon C, Hawkins AFA, James RE, Langhammer P, Mittermeier RA, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL, Silva JMC (2008) Conservation planning and the IUCN Red List. Endangered Species Research, 6, 113-125.
[19]	IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge.
[20]	IUCN (2010) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 8.1 (August 2010) Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee in March 2010. http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/RedList/Red-ListGuidelines.pdf.
[21]	IUCN (2004) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
[22]	Jiang ZG (蒋志刚), Fan EY (樊恩源) (2003) Exploring the endangered species criteria: rethinking the IUCN Red List Criteria. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 11, 383-392. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	Ma KP (马克平), Chen GK (陈国科), Liu B (刘冰), Chen B (陈彬), Amin R, Zhang JL (张金龙), Chun ML (春敏莉) (2011) Asia Plant Conservation Report 2010: A Review of Progress in Implementing the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) (亚洲植物保护进展2010: 评估全球植物保护战略的实施). Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese and English)
[24]	Mace GM, Collar NJ, Gaston KJ, Hilton-Taylor C, Akçakaya HR, Leader-Williams N, Milner-Gulland EJ, Stuart SN (2008) Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conservation Biology, 22, 1424-1442.
[25]	Miller RM, Rodríguez JP, Aniskowicz-Fowler T, Bambarad- eniya C, Boles R, Eaton MA, Gärdenfors U, Keller V, Molur S, Walker S, Pollock C (2006) Extinction risk and conservation priorities. Science, 313, 441.
[26]	Miller RM, RodríGuez JP, Aniskowicz-Fowler T, Bambarad- eniya C, Boles R, Eaton MA, Gärdenfors U, Keller V, Molur S, Walker S, Pollock C (2007) National threatened species listing based on IUCN criteria and regional guidelines: current status and future perspectives. Conse- rvation Biology, 21, 684-696.
[27]	Mrosovsky N, Godfrey MH (2008) The path from grey literature to Red Lists. Endangered Species Research, 6, 185-191.
[28]	Mukherjee PK, Constance L (1993) Umbelliferae (Apiaceae) of India. American Institute of Indian Studies Oxford & IBH Pub. Co., New Delhi.
[29]	Murphey PC, Guralnick RP, Glaubitz R, Neufeld D, Ryan JA (2004) Georeferencing of museum collections: a review of problems and automated tools, and the methodology developed by the Mountain and Plains Spatio-Temporal Database Informatics Initiative (Mapstedi). Phyloinforma- tics, (3), 1-29.
[30]	Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853-858.
[31]	Ohba H (1999) Umbelliferae. In: Flora of Japan Volume II: Angiospermae Dicotyledoneae Archichlamydeae(c) (eds Iwatsuki K, Boufford DE, Ohba H), pp. 268-303. Kodansha, Tokyo.
[32]	Pimenov MG, Leonov MV (1993) The Genera of the Umbelliferae: A Nomenclator. Royal Botanic Gardens & Botanical Garden of Moscow University, Kew & Moscow.
[33]	Pimenov MG, Leonov MV (2004) The Asian Umbelliferae biodiversity database (Asium) with particular reference to South West Asian taxa. Turk Journal of Botany, 28, 139-145.
[34]	Pu FT, Phillippe LR (2005) Pternopetalum. In: Flora of China (eds Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY), pp. 85-92. Science Press, Beijing and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Saint Louis.
[35]	Reddy S, Dávalos LM (2003) Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 1719-1727.
[36]	Rich TCG, Woodruff ER (1992) Recording bias in botanical surveys. Watsonia, 19, 73-95.
[37]	Rivers MC, Bachman SP, Meagher TR, Nic Lughadha EN, Brummitt NA (2010) Subpopulations, locations and fragmentation: applying IUCN red list criteria to herbarium specimen data. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 2071-2085.
[38]	Rivers MC, Taylor L, Brummitt NA, Meagher TR, Roberts DL, Lughadha EN (2011) How many herbarium specimens are needed to detect threatened species? Biological Conserva- tion, 144, 2541-2547.
[39]	Schatz GE (2002) Taxonomy and Herbaria in service of plant conservation: lessons from Madagascar’s endemic families. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 89, 145-152.
[40]	Schatz GE (2009) Plants on the IUCN Red List: setting priorities to inform conservation. Trends in Plant Science, 14, 638-642.
[41]	Sérgio C, Figueira R, Draper D, Menezes R, Sousa AJ (2007) Modelling bryophyte distribution based on ecological information for extent of occurrence assessment. Biological Conservation, 135, 341-351.
[42]	Shu P, Sheh ML (2001) Pollen Photographs and Flora of Umbelliferae in China. Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, Shanghai. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43]	van Swaay C, Maes D, Collins S, Munguira ML, Šašić M, Settele J, Verovnik R, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff I, Cuttelod A (2011) Applying IUCN criteria to invertebrates: how red is the Red List of European butterflies? Biological Conservation, 144, 470-478.
[44]	Wang LS (王利松) (2007) Phenetic analysis of the genus Pternopetalum (Apiaceae). Acta Botanica Yunnanica (云南植物研究), 29, 13-25. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[45]	Wang LS (2008a) The confusing identity of Pternopetalum molle (Apiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 158, 274-295.
[46]	Wang LS (2008b) Taxonomic revision of the Pternopetalum delavayi complex (Apiaceae). Annale of Botannici Fennici, 45, 105-112.
[47]	Wang S (汪松), Xie Y (解焱) (2004) China Species Red List (vol. 1): Red List (中国物种红色名录(第一卷): 红色名录). Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[48]	Wang XP (王献溥) (1996) On the use of IUCN Red List Categories and criteria. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment (植物资源与环境学报), 5, 46-51. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[49]	Wang XP (王献溥), Guo K (郭柯) (2002) On the new revisions of IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment (植物资源与环境学报), 11, 53-56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[50]	Watson MF (1999) Pternopetalum Franchet. In: Flora of Bhutan (eds Grierson AJC, Long DG), pp. 483-484. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK and the Royal Goverment of Bhutan, UK.
[51]	Willis F, Moat J, Paton A (2003) Defining a role for herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of Plectranthus from eastern and southern tropical Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 1537-1552.
[52]	Xie Y (解焱), Wang S (汪松) (1995) New standards of endangered species. Chinese Biodiversity (生物多样性), 3, 234-239. (in Chinese)
[53]	Zhang YB (张殷波), Yuan H (苑虎), Yu M (喻梅) (2011) Assessment of threaten status on the Wild Plants Under State Protection in China. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 19, 57-62. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[54]	Zhou B (周彬), Wang CL (王春玲), Jiang H (蒋宏), Qin HN (覃海宁) (2007) On the Chinese translation of “Vulnerable” in the IUCN Red List Categories and criteria. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 15, 107-108. (in Chinese with English abstract)

物种 Species	标本总数/地标化标本/非重复分布点 Number of specimens/ specimens georeferenced/ Non-repeated locations*	亚种群数目 Number of subpopulations*	分布范围 EOO (km²)*	占有面积 AOO (km²)*				等级 Category	评估说明 Notes for assessment
物种 Species		亚种群数目 Number of subpopulations*	分布范围 EOO (km²)*	1×1	2×2	4×4	10×10
东亚囊瓣芹 P. tanakae	323/234/91	2	2,260,000	90	352	1,408	8,300	VU B2ab (i, ii, iii, iv)+ C2a(ii)	分布范围广泛, EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², 几乎所有成熟个体在单个亚种群中。 EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², Almost all mature individuals in a single subpopulation.
五匹青 P. vulgare	358/309/104	1	1,442,000	104	412	1,648	10,100	VU B2ab (i, ii, iii, iv)+ C2a(ii)	分布范围广泛, EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², 几乎所有成熟个体在单个亚种群中。 EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², Almost all mature individuals in a single subpopulation.
洱源囊瓣芹 P. molle	136/121/53	1	1,155,000	52	208	832	5,100	VU B2ab (i, ii, iii, iv)+ C2a(ii)	分布范围广泛, EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², 几乎所有成熟个体在单个亚种群中。 EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², Almost all mature individuals in a single subpopulation.
澜沧囊瓣芹 P. delavayi	418/351/64	2	921,000	63	252	1,008	6,300	VU B2ab (i, ii, iii, iv)+ C2a(ii)	分布范围广泛, EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², 几乎所有成熟个体在单个亚种群中。 EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², Almost all mature individuals in a single subpopulation.
川鄂囊瓣芹 P. rosthornii	89/81/10	6	109,000	10	40	160	1,000	EN B2	分布范围广泛, EOO>20,000 km², AOO<500 km², 几乎所有成熟个体在单个亚种群中。 EOO>20,000 km², AOO<500 km², Almost all mature individuals in a single subpopulation.
薄叶囊瓣芹 P. leptophyllum	65/33/1	1	<100	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	CR B2ab (i, ii, iii, iv)+ D	分布范围小, EOO<100 km², AOO<10 km², 分布点≤5, 种群非常小, 成熟个体数目<50, 极端条件下, 单一的威胁事件(比如暴雨导致的山体坍塌或滑坡)有可能造成种群的完全消失。 EOO<100 km², AOO<10 km², Locations≤5, small population, mature individuals<50, under extreme conditions, this species will disappear when a single event happens (collapsed or landslide etc.).

物种 Species	标本总数/地标化标本/非重复分布点 Number of specimens/ specimens georeferenced/ Non-repeated locations*	亚种群数目 Number of subpopulations*	分布范围 EOO (km²)*	占有面积 AOO (km²)*				等级 Category	评估说明 Notes for assessment
物种 Species		亚种群数目 Number of subpopulations*	分布范围 EOO (km²)*	1×1	2×2	4×4	10×10
东亚囊瓣芹 P. tanakae	323/234/91	2	2,260,000	90	352	1,408	8,300	VU B2ab (i, ii, iii, iv)+ C2a(ii)	分布范围广泛, EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², 几乎所有成熟个体在单个亚种群中。 EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², Almost all mature individuals in a single subpopulation.
五匹青 P. vulgare	358/309/104	1	1,442,000	104	412	1,648	10,100	VU B2ab (i, ii, iii, iv)+ C2a(ii)	分布范围广泛, EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², 几乎所有成熟个体在单个亚种群中。 EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², Almost all mature individuals in a single subpopulation.
洱源囊瓣芹 P. molle	136/121/53	1	1,155,000	52	208	832	5,100	VU B2ab (i, ii, iii, iv)+ C2a(ii)	分布范围广泛, EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², 几乎所有成熟个体在单个亚种群中。 EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², Almost all mature individuals in a single subpopulation.
澜沧囊瓣芹 P. delavayi	418/351/64	2	921,000	63	252	1,008	6,300	VU B2ab (i, ii, iii, iv)+ C2a(ii)	分布范围广泛, EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², 几乎所有成熟个体在单个亚种群中。 EOO>20,000 km², AOO<2,000 km², Almost all mature individuals in a single subpopulation.
川鄂囊瓣芹 P. rosthornii	89/81/10	6	109,000	10	40	160	1,000	EN B2	分布范围广泛, EOO>20,000 km², AOO<500 km², 几乎所有成熟个体在单个亚种群中。 EOO>20,000 km², AOO<500 km², Almost all mature individuals in a single subpopulation.
薄叶囊瓣芹 P. leptophyllum	65/33/1	1	<100	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	CR B2ab (i, ii, iii, iv)+ D	分布范围小, EOO<100 km², AOO<10 km², 分布点≤5, 种群非常小, 成熟个体数目<50, 极端条件下, 单一的威胁事件(比如暴雨导致的山体坍塌或滑坡)有可能造成种群的完全消失。 EOO<100 km², AOO<10 km², Locations≤5, small population, mature individuals<50, under extreme conditions, this species will disappear when a single event happens (collapsed or landslide etc.).