川西高原三种雉类与其捕食者赤狐的空间关系

doi:10.17520/biods.2020438

生物多样性 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 918-926. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020438

所属专题：青藏高原生物多样性与生态安全

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

川西高原三种雉类与其捕食者赤狐的空间关系

邹博研¹^,², 罗概¹^,², 朱博伟¹^,², 冉江洪¹^,²^,^*(), 房超³

1.四川大学生命科学学院生物资源与生态环境教育部重点实验室, 成都 610065
2.四川大学生命科学学院四川省濒危野生动物保护生物学重点实验室, 成都 610065
3.成都市雷雀生态环保科技有限公司, 成都 610065

收稿日期:2020-11-25 接受日期:2021-03-06 出版日期:2021-07-20 发布日期:2021-03-11
通讯作者: 冉江洪
作者简介:* E-mail: rjhong-01@163.com
基金资助:
第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0402);全国第二次陆生野生动物资源调查项目

The spatial distribution relationship between three pheasant species and mutual predator, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), on the Western Sichuan Plateau

Boyan Zou¹^,², Gai Luo¹^,², Bowei Zhu¹^,², Jianghong Ran¹^,²^,^*(), Chao Fang³

1 Key Laboratory of Bio-Resource and Eco-Environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065
2 Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065
3 Chengdu Leique Ecology & Environmental Protection Technology Co. Ltd., Chengdu 610065

Received:2020-11-25 Accepted:2021-03-06 Online:2021-07-20 Published:2021-03-11
Contact: Jianghong Ran

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

物种的空间分布会受到种间相互作用(如捕食关系等)和环境变量等多种因素共同影响。阐明环境变量和种间相互作用对同域物种空间分布关系的影响, 对于理解群落聚集和生物多样性的维持机制至关重要。为了解川西高原常见雉类与捕食者的空间分布关系及其驱动因素, 本研究利用2016-2018年在川西高原84个红外相机位点获得的682张目标物种的独立照片, 采用条件型双物种占域模型(conditional two-species occupancy model)在相机位点尺度评估了在川西高原广泛分布的黄喉雉鹑(Tetraophasis szechenyii)、血雉(Ithaginis cruentus)和白马鸡(Crossoptilon crossoptilon)与其捕食者赤狐(Vulpes vulpes)的空间分布关系。结果显示: (1)在物种作用和环境变量的共同影响下, 赤狐和血雉(物种相互作用因子, species interaction factor, SIF = 1.31 ± 0.14)与赤狐和黄喉雉鹑(SIF = 1.42 ± 0.41)在研究区域内的空间分布趋于重合, 赤狐和血雉的空间关系随距河流距离的增加呈现先重合后趋于分离的趋势, 而赤狐和黄喉雉鹑的空间关系随距河流距离的增加呈现出由重合转为分离的趋势。赤狐与白马鸡在空间分布上相互独立(SIF = 1), 白马鸡的空间分布主要受环境因子影响, 而赤狐对其没有影响。(2) 3种雉类的探测率受物种作用的影响, 在相机位点尺度上赤狐的存在减少了3种雉类的探测率(pB > rB)。本研究为物种空间分布关系的研究提供了新的案例, 也为理解物种共存机制和生物多样性保护提供了科学依据。

关键词: 空间分布, 捕食关系, 红外相机, 占域模型

Abstract

Aims: Multiple interspecific factors such as predator-prey dynamics and responses to different environmental variables collectively influence the spatial distribution of wildlife species. To be able to understand how these mechanisms influence community aggregation and biodiversity stability, it is crucial to understand role these factors play in impacting the formation of spatial distribution patterns among sympatric species.
Methods: Here, we investigated the spatial distribution correlations and driving factors of three pheasant species commonly seen or surveyed on the Western Sichuan Plateau. We combined a total of 682 independent photos obtained from 84 infrared camera traps from 2016 to 2018 with conditional two-species occupancy model. We then used the model operation to assess the spatial distribution relations on the camera site scale. We used this model operation for each of the three pheasant species (the buff-throated partridge Tetraophasis szechenyii, blood pheasant Ithaginis cruentus, and the white eared-pheasant Crossoptilon crossoptilon) and their predator the red fox which can also be found over a wide area in the Western Sichuan Plateau.
Results: We had two major results from our analyses. First, under the synergic-influence of species interactions and environmental variables, the spatial distribution of the red fox and the blood pheasant (species interaction factor, SIF = 1.31 ± 0.14) was similar to that of the red fox and the buff-throated partridge (SIF = 1.42 ± 0.41). Both these pairs tended to have a great overlap within the study area. Additionally, the spatial distribution between the red fox and the blood pheasant would overlap in some large areas and then spatial distribution overlapped decreased with the increasing distance to rivers. The spatial relationship between the red fox and the buff-throated partridge were exhibited a different trend, which has been a consistently falling overlap ratio tendency since the distance from camera site to rivers began to increase. The red fox and the white eared-pheasant shared independent distribution patterns with each other (SIF = 1). Environmental variables were a strong predictor for the spatial distribution pattern of white-eared pheasants. However, environmental variables hardly had any impact on the distribution strategy for the red fox. The second major result was that the detection probabilities for all three pheasant species was associated with the synergic-influence of species interactions. The presence of red fox practically reduced the detection probability for all three pheasant species on the site scale (pB > rB).
Conclusion: Results from this experiment provide a new up to date case study (with solid scientific basis) that focused on species distribution relationships, and help us understand the importance of species coexistence and biodiversity conservation.

Key words: spatial distribution, predator-prey relationships, camera traps, occupancy model

邹博研, 罗概, 朱博伟, 冉江洪, 房超 (2021) 川西高原三种雉类与其捕食者赤狐的空间关系. 生物多样性, 29, 918-926. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020438.

Boyan Zou, Gai Luo, Bowei Zhu, Jianghong Ran, Chao Fang (2021) The spatial distribution relationship between three pheasant species and mutual predator, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), on the Western Sichuan Plateau. Biodiversity Science, 29, 918-926. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020438.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2020438

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2021/V29/I7/918

图/表 6

参考文献 36

[1]	Bailey LL, Reid JA, Forsman ED, Nichols JD (2009) Modeling co-occurrence of northern spotted and barred owls: Accounting for detection probability differences. Biological Conservation, 142, 2983-2989. DOI URL
[2]	Burton AC, Neilson E, Moreira D, Ladle A, Steenweg R, Fisher JT, Bayne E, Boutin S (2015) Wildlife camera trapping: A review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 675-685. DOI URL
[3]	Case TJ, Bolger DT (1991) The role of introduced species in shaping the distribution and abundance of island reptiles. Evolutionary Ecology, 5, 272-290. DOI URL
[4]	Cavallini P, Lovari S (1991) Environmental-factors influencing the use of habitat in the red fox, Vulpes vulpes. Journal of Zoology, 223, 323-339. DOI URL
[5]	Chen LJ, Shu ZF, Yao WT, Ma Y, Xiao WH, Huang XQ (2019) Combined effects of habitat and interspecific interaction define co-occurrence patterns of sympatric Galliformes. Avian Research, 10, 344-356.
[6]	Chen YH, Luiselli L (2009) Species richness and co-occurrence patterns of Galliformes in China at three large spatial scales: Does scale size matter? Revue D Ecologie-la Terre Et La Vie, 64, 251-260.
[7]	Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: Evidence from field experiments. The American Naturalist, 122, 661-696. DOI URL
[8]	Creel S, Winnie JA Jr (2005) Responses of elk herd size to fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves. Animal Behaviour, 69, 1181-1189. DOI URL
[9]	D’Amen M, Mod HK, Gotelli NJ, Guisan A (2018) Disentangling biotic interactions, environmental filters, and dispersal limitation as drivers of species co-occurrence. Ecography, 41, 1233-1244. DOI URL
[10]	Deng L, Yang HZ (2010) Estimation of natural ecological value for the plateau pasturing area—A case study in Xinlong County of Sichuan Province. Sichuan Environment, 29(2), 89-94. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 邓林, 杨海真 (2010) 高原牧区自然生态价值的测算——以四川省甘孜藏族自治州新龙县为例. 四川环境, 29(2), 89-94.]
[11]	Farris ZJ, Kelly MJ, Karpanty S, Ratelolahy F (2016) Patterns of spatial co-occurrence among native and exotic carnivores in north-eastern Madagascar. Animal Conservation, 19, 189-198. DOI URL
[12]	Ge MJC, Dong DF, Long WX (1999) A preliminary observation on the ecological habits of white eared-pheasant. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 34(1), 26-28. (in Chinese)
	[ 格玛嘉措, 董德福, 龙文祥 (1999) 白马鸡生态习性的初步观察. 动物学杂志, 34(1), 26-28.]
[13]	Godin JGJ, Keenleyside MHA (1984) Foraging on patchily distributed prey by a cichlid fish (Teleostei, Cichlidae): A test of the ideal free distribution theory. Animal Behaviour, 32, 120-131. DOI URL
[14]	Hines JE (2006) PRESENCE—Software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters. USGS-PWRC. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software. (accessed on 2020-11-25)
[15]	Jia CX, Zheng GM, Zhou XP, Zhang HM (1999) Social organization of blood pheasant (Ithaginis cruentus) in Wolong Nature Reserve. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 45, 135-142. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 贾陈喜, 郑光美, 周小平, 张和民 (1999) 卧龙自然保护区血雉的社群组织. 动物学报, 45, 135-142.]
[16]	Jia F, Wang N, Zheng GM (2005) Winter habitat requirements of white eared-pheasant Crossoptilon crossoptilon and blood pheasant Ithaginis cruentus in south-west China. Bird Conservation International, 15, 303-312. DOI URL
[17]	Jia F, Wang N, Zheng GM (2005) Habitat selection and spatial distribution of white eared-pheasant Crossoptilon crossoptilon during early breeding period. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 51, 383-392. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 贾非, 王楠, 郑光美 (2005) 白马鸡繁殖早期栖息地选择和空间分布. 动物学报, 51, 383-392.]
[18]	Lesmeister DB, Nielsen CK, Schauber EM, Hellgren EC (2015) Spatial and temporal structure of a mesocarnivore guild in midwestern North America. Wildlife Monographs, 191, 1-61. DOI URL
[19]	Li LY, Wang HD, Zhang H, Teng LW, Liu ZS (2014) Research progress of habitat selection by red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 42, 3289-3292, 3295. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 李路云, 王海东, 张海, 滕丽微, 刘振生 (2014) 赤狐生境选择研究进展. 安徽农业科学, 42, 3289-3292, 3295.]
[20]	Luttbeg B, Sih A (2004) Predator and prey habitat selection games: The effects of how prey balance foraging and predation risk. Israel Journal of Zoology, 50, 233-254. DOI URL
[21]	Ma Y, Sun ZH, Liu ZS, Teng LW (2014) Food habits by red fox (Vulpes vulpes), a review. Journal of Economic Animal, 18, 53-58. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 马勇, 孙兆惠, 刘振生, 滕丽微 (2014) 赤狐食性的研究进展. 经济动物学报, 18, 53-58.]
[22]	MacKenzie DI, Bailey LL, Nichols JD (2004) Investigating species co-occurrence patterns when species are detected imperfectly. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 546-555. DOI URL
[23]	Magle SB, Simoni LS, Lehrer EW, Brown JS (2014) Urban predator-prey association: Coyote and deer distributions in the Chicago metropolitan area. Urban Ecosystems, 17, 875-891. DOI URL
[24]	Murphy A, Kelly MJ, Karpanty SM, Andrianjakarivelo V, Farris ZJ (2019) Using camera traps to investigate spatial co-occurrence between exotic predators and native prey species: A case study from northeastern Madagascar. Journal of Zoology, 307, 264-273. DOI
[25]	Ngoprasert D, Lynam AJ, Sukmasuang R, Tantipisanuh N, Chutipong W, Steinmetz R, Jenks KE, Gale GA, Grassman LI Jr, Kitamura S, Howard J, Cutter P, Cutter P, Leimgruber P, Songsasen N, Reed DH (2012) Occurrence of three felids across a network of protected areas in Thailand: Prey, intraguild, and habitat associations. Biotropica, 44, 810-817. DOI URL
[26]	Rabelo RM, Aragón S, Bicca-Marques JC (2019) Prey abundance drives habitat occupancy by jaguars in Amazonian floodplain river islands. Acta Oecologica, 97, 28-33. DOI URL
[27]	Richmond OMW, Hines JE, Beissinger SR (2010) Two-species occupancy models: A new parameterization applied to co-occurrence of secretive rails. Ecological Applications, 20, 2036-2046. DOI URL
[28]	Ritchie EG, Martin JK, Johnson CN, Fox BJ (2009) Separating the influences of environment and species interactions on patterns of distribution and abundance: Competition between large herbivores. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 724-731. DOI PMID
[29]	Steinmetz R, Seuaturien N, Chutipong W (2013) Tigers, leopards, and dholes in a half-empty forest: Assessing species interactions in a guild of threatened carnivores. Biological Conservation, 163, 68-78. DOI URL
[30]	Wang B, Xu Y, Price M, Yang N, Liu W, Zhu BW, Zhong X, Ran JH (2021) Niche partitioning among three montane ground-dwelling pheasant species along multiple ecological dimensions. Ibis, 163, 171-182. DOI URL
[31]	Wang YW, Allen ML, Wilmers CC (2015) Mesopredator spatial and temporal responses to large predators and human development in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California. Biological Conservation, 190, 23-33. DOI URL
[32]	Werner EE (1992) Individual behavior and higher-order species interactions. The American Naturalist, 140, s5-s32. DOI URL
[33]	Yang CH, Zhang HM, Zhou XP, Wang PY, Wang XM (2006) Review of habitat selection in the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26, 3442-3453. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 杨春花, 张和民, 周小平, 王鹏彦, 王小明 (2006) 大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)生境选择研究进展. 生态学报, 26, 3442-3453.]
[34]	You ZQ, Tang ZH, Yang YB, Yang LH, Shi HY, Liu H, Gan X, Zheng TC, Jiang ZG (2014) Summer habitat selection by white-lipped deer (Cervus albirostris) in Chaqingsongduo White-lipped Deer National Nature Reserve. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 34, 46-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 游章强, 唐中海, 杨远斌, 杨丽红, 石红艳, 刘昊, 甘潇, 郑天才, 蒋志刚 (2014) 察青松多白唇鹿国家级自然保护区白唇鹿对夏季生境的选择. 兽类学报, 34, 46-53.]
[35]	Zhao GJ, Gong YN, Yang HT, Xie B, Wang TM, Ge JP, Feng LM (2019) Study on habitat use and activity rhythms of wild boar in eastern region of Northeast Tiger and Leopard National Park. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 39, 431-441. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 赵国静, 宫一男, 杨海涛, 谢冰, 王天明, 葛剑平, 冯利民 (2019) 东北虎豹国家公园东部的野猪生境利用和活动节律初步研究. 兽类学报, 39, 431-441.]
[36]	Zhu BW, Wang B, Ran JH, Li B, Huang F, Li XQ, Gu XD (2019) Seasonal variation of daily activity patterns and diet of yellow-throated marten (Martes flavigula). Acta Theriologica Sinica, 39, 52-61. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 朱博伟, 王彬, 冉江洪, 李波, 黄蜂, 李晓清, 古晓东 (2019) 黄喉貂日活动节律及食性的季节变化. 兽类学报, 39, 52-61.]

参数 Parameters	描述 Description
psiA	物种A对位点使用的概率 Probability of site use for species A
psiBA	当物种A存在时, 物种B对位点使用的概率 Probability of site use for species B, given species A is present
psiBa	当物种A不存在时, 物种B对位点使用的概率 Probability of site use for species B, given species A is absent
pA	当物种B不存在时, 物种A的探测概率 Probability of detection for species A, given species B is absent
pB	当物种A不存在时, 物种B的探测概率 Probability of detection for species B, given species A is absent
rA	当两物种都存在时, 物种A的探测概率 Probability of detection for species A, given both species are present
rBA	当两物种都存在且物种A被探测到时, 物种B的探测概率 Probability of detection for species B, given both species are present and species A is detected
rBa	当两物种都存在且物种A未被探测到时, 物种B的探测概率 Probability of detection for species B, given both species are present and species A is not detected

参数 Parameters	描述 Description
psiA	物种A对位点使用的概率 Probability of site use for species A
psiBA	当物种A存在时, 物种B对位点使用的概率 Probability of site use for species B, given species A is present
psiBa	当物种A不存在时, 物种B对位点使用的概率 Probability of site use for species B, given species A is absent
pA	当物种B不存在时, 物种A的探测概率 Probability of detection for species A, given species B is absent
pB	当物种A不存在时, 物种B的探测概率 Probability of detection for species B, given species A is absent
rA	当两物种都存在时, 物种A的探测概率 Probability of detection for species A, given both species are present
rBA	当两物种都存在且物种A被探测到时, 物种B的探测概率 Probability of detection for species B, given both species are present and species A is detected
rBa	当两物种都存在且物种A未被探测到时, 物种B的探测概率 Probability of detection for species B, given both species are present and species A is not detected

模型 Models	参数数量 Number of parameters	AIC	ΔAIC	AIC Wt
赤狐 + 白马鸡 Vulpes vulpes + Crossoptilon crossoptilon
psiA, psiB (ELE + DTR); pA, pB, rB	7	1,120.73	0	0.9731
psiA, psiB; pA, pB, rB	5	1,128.81	8.08	0.0171
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB, rB	6	1,130.8	10.07	0.0063
psiA, psiB (ELE + DTR); pA, pB	6	1,132.21	11.48	0.0031
psiA, psiBA (ELE + DTR), psiBa (ELE + DTR); pA, pB	9	1,137.12	16.39	0.0003
psiA, psiB; pA, pB	4	1,141.3	20.57	0
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB	5	1,142.01	21.28	0
psiA, psiBA (ELE + DTR), psiBa (ELE + DTR); pA, pB, rB	10	1,151.45	30.72	0
赤狐 + 黄喉雉鹑 Vulpes vulpes + Tetraophasis szechenyii
psiA, psiBA (DTW), psiBa (DTW); pA, pB, rB	8	814.35	0	0.9847
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB, rB	6	823.13	8.78	0.0122
psiA, psiB (DTW); pA, pB, rB	6	826.47	12.12	0.0023
psiA, psiB; pA, pB, rB	5	829.01	14.66	0.0006
psiA, psiBA (DTW), psiBa (DTW); pA, pB	7	833.91	19.56	0.0001
psiA, psiB (DTW); pA, pB	5	833.97	19.62	0.000
psiA, psiB; pA, pB	4	836.53	22.18	0
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB	5	837.41	23.06	0
赤狐 + 血雉 Vulpes vulpes + Ithaginis cruentus
psiA, psiBA (DTW), psiBa (DTW); pA, pB, rB	8	935.01	0	0.773
psiA, psiB (DTW); pA, pB, rB	6	937.74	2.73	0.1974
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB, rBa	6	942.00	6.99	0.0235
psiA, psiB; pA, pB, rBa	5	944.68	9.67	0.0061
psiA, psiB (DTW); pA, pB	5	968.95	33.94	0
psiA, psiBA (DTW), psiBa (DTW); pA, pB	7	972.72	97.71	0
psiA, psiB; pA, pB	4	975.74	40.73	0
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB	5	977.74	42.73	0

模型 Models	参数数量 Number of parameters	AIC	ΔAIC	AIC Wt
赤狐 + 白马鸡 Vulpes vulpes + Crossoptilon crossoptilon
psiA, psiB (ELE + DTR); pA, pB, rB	7	1,120.73	0	0.9731
psiA, psiB; pA, pB, rB	5	1,128.81	8.08	0.0171
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB, rB	6	1,130.8	10.07	0.0063
psiA, psiB (ELE + DTR); pA, pB	6	1,132.21	11.48	0.0031
psiA, psiBA (ELE + DTR), psiBa (ELE + DTR); pA, pB	9	1,137.12	16.39	0.0003
psiA, psiB; pA, pB	4	1,141.3	20.57	0
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB	5	1,142.01	21.28	0
psiA, psiBA (ELE + DTR), psiBa (ELE + DTR); pA, pB, rB	10	1,151.45	30.72	0
赤狐 + 黄喉雉鹑 Vulpes vulpes + Tetraophasis szechenyii
psiA, psiBA (DTW), psiBa (DTW); pA, pB, rB	8	814.35	0	0.9847
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB, rB	6	823.13	8.78	0.0122
psiA, psiB (DTW); pA, pB, rB	6	826.47	12.12	0.0023
psiA, psiB; pA, pB, rB	5	829.01	14.66	0.0006
psiA, psiBA (DTW), psiBa (DTW); pA, pB	7	833.91	19.56	0.0001
psiA, psiB (DTW); pA, pB	5	833.97	19.62	0.000
psiA, psiB; pA, pB	4	836.53	22.18	0
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB	5	837.41	23.06	0
赤狐 + 血雉 Vulpes vulpes + Ithaginis cruentus
psiA, psiBA (DTW), psiBa (DTW); pA, pB, rB	8	935.01	0	0.773
psiA, psiB (DTW); pA, pB, rB	6	937.74	2.73	0.1974
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB, rBa	6	942.00	6.99	0.0235
psiA, psiB; pA, pB, rBa	5	944.68	9.67	0.0061
psiA, psiB (DTW); pA, pB	5	968.95	33.94	0
psiA, psiBA (DTW), psiBa (DTW); pA, pB	7	972.72	97.71	0
psiA, psiB; pA, pB	4	975.74	40.73	0
psiA, psiBA, psiBa; pA, pB	5	977.74	42.73	0

物种对 Species pairs	psiA ± SE	psiBA ± SE	psiBa ± SE	pA ± SE	pB ± SE	rB ± SE	SIF ± SE
赤狐 + 白马鸡 Vulpes vulpes + Crossoptilon crossoptilon	0.50 ± 0.10	0.68 ± 0.20	0.68 ± 0.20	0.10 ± 0.02	0.32 ± 0.03	0.14 ± 0.02	1.00
赤狐 + 黄喉雉鹑 Vulpes vulpes + Tetraophasis szechenyii	0.56 ± 0.07	0.70 ± 0.08	0.31 ± 0.38	0.09 ± 0.01	0.42 ± 0.07	0.09 ± 0.02	1.42 ± 0.41
赤狐 + 血雉 Vulpes vulpes + Ithaginis cruentus	0.62 ± 0.07	0.81 ± 0.30	0.29 ± 0.17	0.08 ± 0.01	0.59 ± 0.05	0.11 ± 0.01	1.31 ± 0.14

川西高原三种雉类与其捕食者赤狐的空间关系

The spatial distribution relationship between three pheasant species and mutual predator, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), on the Western Sichuan Plateau

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨俊毅, 关潇, 李俊生, 刘晶晶, 郝颢晶, 王槐睿. 乌江流域生物多样性与生态系统服务的空间格局及相互关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 23061-.
[2]	楼晨阳, 任海保, 陈小南, 米湘成, 童冉, 朱念福, 陈磊, 吴统贵, 申小莉. 钱江源国家公园森林群落的物种多样性、结构多样性及其对黑麂出现概率的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22518-.
[3]	赵坤明, 陈圣宾, 杨锡福. 基于红外相机技术调查四川都江堰破碎化森林鸟兽多样性及优势种活动节律[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22529-.
[4]	陈本平, 陈建武, 凌征文, 杨旭, 陈鑫, 李生强, 杨彪. 四川老君山国家级自然保护区林下鸟兽多样性及动态变化数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22566-.
[5]	李珍珍, 杜梦甜, 朱原辛, 王大伟, 李治霖, 王天明. 基于红外相机的不可个体识别动物种群密度估算方法[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22422-.
[6]	王怡涵, 赵倩倩, 刁奕欣, 顾伯健, 翁悦, 张卓锦, 陈泳滨, 王放. 基于红外相机调查上海市区小灵猫的活动节律、栖息地利用及其对人类活动的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22294-.
[7]	林木青, 张应明, 欧阳芳, 束祖飞, 朱朝东, 肖治术. 广东车八岭国家级自然保护区独栖性胡蜂多样性空间分布特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22310-.
[8]	史湘莹, 李雪阳, 魏春玥, 孙戈, 刘震, 赵翔, 周嘉鼎, 樊简, 李成, 吕植. 雅鲁藏布大峡谷鸟兽多样性及其海拔和季节分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22491-.
[9]	崔家鹤, 李智勇, 王宇池, 孙蔷, 莎娜, 李紫晶, 武艳涛, 史亚博, 韩瀛, 李明乐, 王立新, 赵利清, 梁存柱. 垫状驼绒藜群落特征及地理分布数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(10): 23172-.
[10]	王东, 赛青高娃, 王子涵, 赵宏秀, 连新明. 长江源区同域分布兔狲、藏狐和赤狐的时空重叠度[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 21365-.
[11]	孔玥峤, 刘炎林, 贺成武, 李天醍, 李全亮, 马存新, 王大军, 李晟. 评估荒漠猫的日活动节律: 基于红外相机与卫星颈圈数据的对比[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22081-.
[12]	初漠嫣, 梁书洁, 李沛芸, 贾丁, 阿卜杜赛麦提·买尔迪亚力, 李雪阳, 姜楠, 赵翔, 李发祥, 肖凌云, 吕植. 三江源国家级自然保护区内云塔村雪豹种群动态[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22157-.
[13]	邓雪琴, 刘统, 刘天时, 徐恺, 姚松, 黄小群, 肖治术. 河南内乡宝天曼国家级自然保护区豹猫及其潜在猎物之间日活动节律的季节性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22263-.
[14]	王双贵, 郭志宏, 顾伯健, 李天醍, 苏玉兵, 马伯丞, 管宏信, 黄巧雯, 王放, 张卓锦. 六盘山华北豹的栖息地利用及保护建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22342-.
[15]	王雅婷, 张定海, 张志山. 古尔班通古特沙漠固定沙丘上白梭梭和梭梭的空间分布及种间关联性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(3): 21280-.