生物多样性 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 24483.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024483

• • 上一篇    下一篇

只绿是不够的: 一个生物多样性友好的城市公园管理框架

胡敏, 李彬彬*, Coraline Goron   

  1. 昆山杜克大学环境研究中心, 江苏昆山 215316
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-31 修回日期:2025-04-07 接受日期:2025-05-29 出版日期:2025-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 李彬彬

Green is not enough: A management framework for urban biodiversity-friendly parks

Min Hu, Binbin Li*, Coraline Goron   

  1. Environmental Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu 215316, China
  • Received:2024-10-31 Revised:2025-04-07 Accepted:2025-05-29 Online:2025-05-20
  • Contact: Binbin Li

摘要: 城市在保护生物多样性方面的作用正在逐渐得到认可。作为中国城市最主要的绿地类型之一, 城市公园有潜力为城市生物多样性的提升作出贡献。然而, 城市公园高强度和不恰当的管理养护措施仍然是其生物多样性提升的障碍, 而调整管理实践面临城市情境下的复杂挑战。本文聚焦中国城市公园的管理养护实践对生物多样性的影响, 分析了当前公园管理养护的目标、依据的法律法规与行业实践, 并尝试识别城市公园调整管理实践促进生物多样性保护的空间。研究发现, 中国城市公园需要满足多个目标, 一定程度上制约了生物多样性保护的实现。但是, 通过最大化不同目标与生物多样性保护的协同效应、最小化目标间的权衡, 城市公园仍然能够将保护生物多样性融入它的管理目标之中。本文提出认证生物多样性友好的城市公园的政策建议, 并构建了一个管理框架, 旨在指导公园管理者的实践和地方政府的评价。此外, 为了推动更大范围的变革, 还需应对城市公园管理养护相关的市场失灵问题。

关键词: 城市生物多样性, 城市公园, 城市绿地, 管理养护, 市场失灵

Abstract

Aims: The potential of cities to preserve biodiversity is gaining increased recognition. Urban green spaces (UGS), such as urban parks, play a crucial role in this effort. Research indicates that the ability of UGS to support biodiversity depends on several factors, with management activities being a key determinant. However, the current highly intense and inappropriate management of urban parks continues to hinder biodiversity enhancement. Improving management faces complex challenges in the urban context. In this comment paper, I focus on the management practices of Chinese urban parks and aim to answer: How can urban parks effectively enhance biodiversity by adjusting management practices? 

Methodology: A three-stage approach was employed in this study. First, the current regulatory framework for urban park management and biodiversity conservation was reviewed. Second, fieldwork was conducted to gather critical first-hand data through semi-structured interviews across ten urban parks and botanical gardens. Third, the data were analyzed to generate potential solutions, including a proposed management framework. 

Results: Urban parks serve multiple functions for city residents and are required to meet basic needs such as safety and recreation. Inherent tensions exist between human-oriented needs, such as sanitation and aesthetic landscaping, and biodiversity conservation. Despite these conflicts, it is still possible to improve certain management practices by minimizing trade-offs among competing objectives. 

Conclusion: By identifying areas for improvement and exploring root causes, such as market failures, I propose a policy recommendation for certifying biodiversity-friendly urban parks and present a management framework to guide practical changes in park operations.

Key words: urban biodiversity, Chinese urban parks, urban green spaces, management and maintenance, market failure