生物多样性 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 25330.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025330  cstr: 32101.14.biods.2025330

• 研究报告: 生物安全与自然保护 • 上一篇    下一篇

生物多样性风险对企业财务绩效的影响: 来自中国上市公司的证据

李伯尧1, 盛天成2, 幸小云2*   

  1. 1. 中国政法大学商学院, 北京 100088; 2. 北京林业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-18 修回日期:2026-02-09 接受日期:2026-04-08 出版日期:2026-04-20 发布日期:2026-05-27
  • 通讯作者: 幸小云

Impact of biodiversity risk on corporate financial performance: Evidence from listed companies in China

Boyao Li1, Tiancheng Sheng2, Xiaoyun Xing2*   

  1. 1 Business School, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China 

    2 School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

  • Received:2025-08-18 Revised:2026-02-09 Accepted:2026-04-08 Online:2026-04-20 Published:2026-05-27
  • Contact: Xiaoyun Xing

摘要: 中国作为兼具生态压力与快速发展的新兴经济体, 关于生物多样性风险如何影响企业财务绩效的实证证据仍较为有限。基于2007–2022年中国A股上市公司的面板数据, 本文采用生物多样性风险暴露指数和生物多样性关注指数量化企业层面的风险敞口, 系统检验生物多样性风险对企业资产回报率(ROA)的影响。研究发现, 生物多样性风险显著降低企业财务绩效, 表明生物多样性风险会通过推升合规成本和资源再配置压力侵蚀企业盈利能力。这一负向影响具有显著异质性: 在地理维度上, 市场化程度高、环境规制刚性高的东部地区的风险抑制效应显著强于政策缓冲空间较大的中西部地区; 在所有制维度上, 非国有企业的财务脆弱性显著高于国有企业; 在行业维度上, 生物多样性风险影响和企业应对方式存在明显差异。同时, 绿色产品创新在生物多样性风险与企业财务绩效之间发挥中介作用, 短期内可能因创新投入增加而加重财务压力。本研究在中国情境下为生物多样性风险影响企业基本面提供了微观证据, 并揭示了其在地理、所有制和行业维度上的异质性, 为协调生态文明建设目标与企业可持续发展、完善差异化环境规制和创新激励机制提供了经验依据。

关键词: 生物多样性风险, 企业财务绩效, 环境规制, 绿色创新, 异质性

Abstract

Aims: As an emerging economy facing both ecological pressure and rapid development, China has limited empirical evidence on how biodiversity risk affects corporate financial performance. 

Methods: Using panel data for Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2022, this study employed the Biodiversity Exposure Index and the Biodiversity Concern Index to quantify corporate-level risk exposure, and systematically examined the impact of biodiversity risks on corporate return on assets. 

Results: Biodiversity risks significantly reduced corporate financial performance, highlighting the transmission mechanism through which biodiversity risks erode profitability by increasing compliance costs and resource reallocation pressures. This negative impact exhibited significant heterogeneity. Geographically, in the eastern regions with high marketization levels and stringent environmental regulations, the risk suppression effect was significantly stronger than in the central and western regions with greater policy buffer space. In terms of ownership structure, non-state-owned enterprises, constrained by financing limitations and weaker policy support, exhibited significantly higher financial vulnerability than state-owned enterprises. In terms of industry, the impacts of biodiversity risks and corporate response strategies exhibited significant differences. Additionally, product innovation played a mediating role between biodiversity risk and corporate financial performance, potentially exacerbating financial pressure in the short term due to increased innovation investments. This study provides micro‑level evidence of biodiversity risk impacts on corporate fundamentals in the Chinese context. 

Conclusions: The findings reveal the geographical, ownership structure, and industry heterogeneity of these effects. This study offers critical insights for aligning ecological civilization goals with corporate sustainability and provides important implications for refining differentiated environmental regulatory policies and innovative incentive mechanisms. Policies should incorporate biodiversity risks into national planning, adopt differentiated measures, and offset short-term costs by supporting green innovation.

Key words: biodiversity risk, corporate financial performance, environmental regulation, green innovation, heterogeneity