生物多样性 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 24525. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024525 cstr: 32101.14.biods.2024525
• 昆蒙框架如何在中国体制下成为主流工作目标专题 • 上一篇 下一篇
赵维洋1,2(), 王伟1,2,*(
)(
), 马冰然1,2(
)
收稿日期:
2024-12-01
接受日期:
2025-03-04
出版日期:
2025-03-20
发布日期:
2025-03-04
通讯作者:
*E-mail: wang.wei@craes.org.cn
基金资助:
Zhao Weiyang1,2(), Wang Wei1,2,*(
)(
), Ma Bingran1,2(
)
Received:
2024-12-01
Accepted:
2025-03-04
Online:
2025-03-20
Published:
2025-03-04
Contact:
*E-mail: wang.wei@craes.org.cn
Supported by:
摘要:
其他有效的区域保护措施(other effective area-based conservation measures, OECMs)作为传统自然保护地体系的重要补充, 在全球生物多样性保护中扮演着越来越关键的角色。本研究通过深入剖析OECMs的发展历程及当前研究进展, 结合中国OECMs的相关进展与特点, 进一步探讨了中国OECMs在《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》(简称《昆蒙框架》)下的未来发展前景。近年来, 世界各国围绕OECMs的持续政策推进, 充分体现了国际社会对这一工具在全球生物多样性保护战略中重要补充作用的高度重视。从概念提出到实践推广, OECMs的国际认可过程经历了不断深化和完善, 成为全球应对生物多样性丧失与生态系统退化的重要手段。总体来看, 世界各国和有关组织围绕OECMs的认定标准、认定流程和识别方法, 以及OECMs的治理及其是否长期有效开展了较为系统的研究。尽管OECMs已在国际层面赢得了广泛认同, 但其具体执行与监测环节依旧面临着诸多亟待解决的问题与挑战。为此, 本研究进一步提出OECMs在《昆蒙框架》下的未来发展前景, 包括加快OECMs的主流化进程、强化生物多样性保护成效的监测与评估、探索OECMs退出机制、建立跨领域协同与多方利益协调机制、加强海域OECMs的研究与认定等方面, 以期为我国以及世界各国生物多样性保护体系的构建与完善提供参考依据。
赵维洋, 王伟, 马冰然 (2025) 其他有效的区域保护措施(OECMs)研究进展与展望. 生物多样性, 33, 24525. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024525.
Zhao Weiyang, Wang Wei, Ma Bingran (2025) Advances and prospects in research on other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs). Biodiversity Science, 33, 24525. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024525.
图1 其他有效的区域保护措施(OECMs)认定流程。Y代表评估结果为“是”; N代表评估结果为“否”; 对每项标准的答复均为“Y”的场地即为经确认的OECMs, 利益相关方同意和治理机构批准。有“Y”和“不确定或部分是”两种答复的场地, 或全部为“不确定或部分是”答复的场地, 获取进一步的信息或产生其他变化使其确认为OECMs之前, 仍然是候选OECMs。有一个或多个“N”答复的场地目前不能成为OECMs, 但如果该场地发生变化以期符合所有标准, 则将来可能会重新进行评估(改编自IUCN, 2023a)。
Fig. 1 The process for recognizing other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs). “Y” indicates a positive evaluation result, while “N” indicates a negative evaluation result. Sites for which all criteria receive a “Y” response are confirmed as OECMs, subject to stakeholder consent and approval by the governing body. Sites with a combination of “Y” and “uncertain or partially yes” responses, or those with entirely “uncertain or partially yes” responses, remain candidate OECMs until further information or changes confirm their recognition as OECMs. Sites with one or more “N” responses cannot currently be considered OECMs, but may be re-evaluated in the future if changes occur that enable them to meet all criteria (adapted from IUCN, 2023a).
[1] | Beazley L, Kenchington E, Korabik M, Fenton D, King M(2021) Other effective area-based conservation measure promotes recovery in a cold-water coral reef. Global Ecology and Conservation, 26, e01485. |
[2] | Bhola N, Klimmek H, Kingston N, Burgess ND, van Soesbergen A, Corrigan C, Harrison J, Kok MTJ(2021) Perspectives on area-based conservation and its meaning for future biodiversity policy. Conservation Biology, 35, 168-178. |
[3] | Chen X, Tian TT, Pan H, Jin YY, Zhang XD, Yang B, Zhang L(2024) Establishing a protected area network in Xinlong with other effective area-based conservation measures. Conservation Biology, 38, e14297. |
[4] | CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2018) CBD/COP/DEC/14/8:Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. (accessed on 2024-10-08) https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf. |
[5] | CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2020) Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, Including Aichi Biodiversity Targets. (accessed on 2024-10-08) https://www.cbd.int/sp/. |
[6] | CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2022) Kunming Declaration “Ecological Civilization: Building a Shared Future for All Life on Earth”. (accessed on 2024-10-08) https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/c2db/972a/fb32e0a277bf1ccfff742be5/cop-15-05-add1-en.pdf. |
[7] | Cook CN(2024a) Diverse approaches to protecting biodiversity: The different conservation measures discussed as possible other effective area-based conservation measures. Conservation Letters, 17, e13027. |
[8] | Cook CN(2024b) Progress developing the concept of other effective area-based conservation measures. Conservation Biology, 38, e14106. |
[9] | Donald PF, Buchanan GM, Balmford A, Bingham H, Couturier AR, de la Rosa GE Jr, Gacheru P, Herzog SK, Jathar G, Kingston N, Marnewick D, Maurer G, Reaney L, Shmygaleva T, Sklyarenko S, Stevens CMD, Butchart SHM(2019) The prevalence, characteristics and effectiveness of Aichi Target 11’s “other effective area-based conservation measures” (OECMs) in key biodiversity areas. Conservation Letters, 12, e12659. |
[10] | Dudley N, Jonas H, Nelson F, Parrish J, Pyhälä A, Stolton S, Watson JEM(2018) The essential role of other effective area-based conservation measures in achieving big bold conservation targets. Global Ecology and Conservation, 15, e00424. |
[11] | Earth Journalism Network (2022) Morocco’s Biodiversity Suffers as Rich Locals and Foreign Tourists Hunt for Fun. (accessed on 2024-02-20) https://earthjournalism.net/stories/moroccos-biodiversity-suffers-as-rich-locals-and-foreign-tourists-hunt-for-fun. |
[12] | Fitzsimons JA, Stolton S, Rafa M(2024) Advances in privately protected areas. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 5, 1441046. |
[13] | Government of Canada (2019) List of Marine Refuges: Bay of Islands Salmon Migration Closure. (accessed on 2024-10-28) https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/oceans/oecm-amcepz/refuges/lophelia-eng.html. |
[14] | Gurney GG, Darling ES, Ahmadia GN, Agostini VN, Ban NC, Blythe J, Claudet J, Epstein G, Estradivari, Himes-Cornell A, Jonas HD, Armitage D, Campbell SJ, Cox C, Friedman WR, Gill D, Lestari P, Mangubhai S, McLeod E, Muthiga NA, Naggea J, Ranaivoson R, Wenger A, Yulianto I, Jupiter SD(2021) Biodiversity needs every tool in the box: Use OECMs. Nature, 595, 646-649. |
[15] | Haase P, Tonkin JD, Stoll S, Burkhard B, Frenzel M, Geijzendorffer IR, Häuser C, Klotz S, Kühn I, McDowell WH, Mirtl M, Müller F, Musche M, Penner J, Zacharias S, Schmeller DS(2018) The next generation of site-based long-term ecological monitoring: Linking essential biodiversity variables and ecosystem integrity. Science of the Total Environment, 613, 1376-1384. |
[16] | Hockings M, Leverington F, Cook C(2015) Protected area management effectiveness. In: Protected Area Governance and Management (eds WorboysGL, LockwoodM, KothariA, FearyS, PulsfordI),pp.889-928. ANU Press, Canberra. |
[17] | Hoesen J, Bagshaw D, Elliott J, Haas CA, Kelly J, Lazaruk H, MacKinnon D, Lemieux CJ(2023) Assessing the effectiveness of potential protected areas and OECMs in conserving biodiversity against subsurface resource extraction impacts. Biological Conservation, 283, 110134. |
[18] | International Land Conservation Network News (2024a) China Announces Its First OECMs at COP16, Advancing Its “30×30” Conservation Target. (accessed on 2024-11-20) https://landconservationnetwork.org/china-announces-its-first-oecms-at-cop16-advancing-its-30x30-conservation-target/. |
[19] | International Land Conservation Network News (2024b) Australia Grapples with New Draft National OECM Framework That Falls Short of Conservationists’ Expectations. (accessed on 2025-03-02)https://landconservationnetwork.org/australia-grapples-with-new-draft-national-oecm-framework-that-falls-short-of-conservationists-expectations/. |
[20] | IUCN (2019) Recognising and Reporting Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures. (accessed on 2024-11-20) https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/PATRS-003-En.pdf. |
[21] | IUCN (2020a) Algeria and Morocco Acknowledge Biodiversity Value of Cultural Parks, Biosphere and Hunting Reserves Through OECMs. (accessed on 2024-11-20)https://www.iucn.org/news/mediterranean/202009/algeria-and-morocco-acknowledge-biodiversity-value-cultural-parks-biosphere-and-hunting-reserves-through-oecms. |
[22] | IUCN (2020b) Tapping OECMs Potential to Advance Aichi Target 11 in Southern and Eastern Mediterranean Countries. (accessed on 2024-10-20) https://iucn.org/news/mediterranean/202006/tapping-oecms-potential-advance-aichi-target-11-southern-and-eastern-mediterranean-countries. |
[23] | IUCN (2023a) Site-Level Tool for Identifying Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs). (accessed on 2024-10-28) https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/51296. |
[24] | IUCN (2023b) Nature, Culture and Community Commitment to Effective Area-based Conservation—Recognising What is an ‘OECM’ in Korea. (accessed on 2025-02-17) https://iucn.org/story/202302/nature-culture-and-community-commitment-effective-area-based-conservation-recognising. |
[25] | IUCN (2024a) Global OECMs Practice: Insights from China and International Case Studies Contribute to Common Pathways for Definition. (accessed on 2024-11-28) https://iucn.org/blog/202411/global-oecms-practice-insights-china-and-international-case-studies-contribute-common-1. |
[26] | IUCN (2024b) A Stocktaking Report on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures in China. (accessed on 2024-11-18) https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2024-027-En.pdf. |
[27] | IUCN (2024c) IUCN and Korea Work towards Effective Protected and Conserved Areas. (accessed on 2025-02-17) https://iucn.org/news/202403/iucn-and-korea-work-towards-effective-protected-and-conserved-areas. |
[28] | Jin T, Bu JY, Ma JZ(2022) Other effective area-based conservation measures of global experiences and implications for post-2020 biodiversity conservation in China. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 51(1), 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 靳彤, 卜君玉, 马建忠 (2022) 其他有效的区域保护措施的国际经验及对中国2020年后生物多样性保护的启示. 西部林业科学, 51(1), 1-8. ] | |
[29] | Jonas HD, Barbuto V, Jonas, Kothari A, Nelson F(2014) New steps of change: Looking beyond protected areas to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. PARKS, 20, 111-128. |
[30] | Jonas HD, Bingham HC, Bennett NJ, Woodley S, Zlatanova R, Howland E, Belle E, Upton J, Gottlieb B, Kamath V, Lessmann J, Delli G, Dubois G, Ahmadia G, Claudet J, Cook C, Deza J, Grorud-Colvert K, Gurney G, Lemieux CJ, Ruiz L(2024) Global status and emerging contribution of other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) towards the ‘30×30’ biodiversity Target 3. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 5, 1447434. |
[31] | Jonas HD, MacKinnon K, Dudley N, Hockings M, Jessen S, Dan L, MacKinnon D, Matallana-Tobón CL, Sandwith T, Waithaka J, Woodley S(2018) Other effective area-based conservation measures: From Aichi Target 11 to the Post-2020 Biodiversity Framework. PARKS, 24, 9-16. |
[32] | Laffoley D, Dudley N, Jonas H, MacKinnon D, MacKinnon K, Hockings M, Woodley S(2017) An introduction to ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’ under Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Origin, interpretation and emerging ocean issues. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 27, 130-137. |
[33] | Lü Z(2022) Meeting China’s “3030 goal” on biodiversity conservation. Frontiers, (4), 24-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 吕植 (2022) 中国生物多样性保护与“3030目标”. 人民论坛 · 学术前沿, (4), 24-34.] | |
[34] | Maini B, Blythe JL, Darling ES, Gurney GG(2023) Charting the value and limits of other effective conservation measures (OECMs) for marine conservation: A Delphi study. Marine Policy, 147, 105350. |
[35] | Marnewick D, Stevens CMD, Jonas H, Antrobus-Wuth R, Wilson N, Theron N(2021) Assessing the extent and contribution of OECMs in South Africa. PARKS, 27, 57-70. |
[36] | Maxwell SL, Cazalis V, Dudley N, Hoffmann M, Rodrigues ASL, Stolton S, Visconti P, Woodley S, Kingston N, Lewis E, Maron M, Strassburg BBN, Wenger A, Jonas HD, Venter O, Watson JEM(2020) Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century. Nature, 586, 217-227. |
[37] | Ministry of the Environment of the Government of Japan (2024a) Japan’s 30by30 roadmap. (accessed on 2025-03-02) https://policies.env.go.jp/nature/biodiversity/30by30alliance/documents/3030emap.pdf. |
[38] | Ministry of the Environment of the Government of Japan (2024b) Registration of Japan’s first OECMs on the World Database on OECMs. (accessed on 2025-03-02) https://www.env.go.jp/en/press/press_02886.html. |
[39] | Mitchell BA, Fitzsimons JA, Stevens CMD, Wright DR(2018) PPA or OECM? Differentiating between privately protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures on private land. PARKS, 24, 49-60. |
[40] | Palomo I, Montes C, Martín-López B, González JA, García-Llorente M, Alcorlo P, Mora MRG(2014) Incorporating the social-ecological approach in protected areas in the Anthropocene. BioScience, 64, 181-191. |
[41] | Raquino MER, Pajaro M, Enaje JE, Tercero RB, Torio TG, Watts P(2023) Capacitating Philippine indigenous and local institutions and actualising local synergies on restorative ridge-to-reef biodiversity conservation for food security and livelihoods. Maiko Nishi, p. 247. |
[42] | Rayner L, Lindenmayer DB, Wood JT, Gibbons P, Manning AD(2014) Are protected areas maintaining bird diversity? Ecography, 37, 43-53. |
[43] | Renn C, Rees S, Rees A, Davies BF, Cartwright AY, Fanshawe S, Attrill MJ, Holmes LA, Sheehan EV(2024) Lessons from Lyme Bay (UK) to inform policy, management, and monitoring of marine protected areas. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 81, 276-292. |
[44] | Rodríguez-Rodríguez D, Sánchez-Espinosa A, Abdul Malak D,(2021) Potential contribution of OECMs to international area-based conservation targets in a biodiversity rich country, Spain. Journal for Nature Conservation, 62, 126019. |
[45] | Stolpe G, Howland E, Upton J(2024) OECMS in Europe: The way forward for Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures. (accessed on 2024-11-15) https://iucn.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/oecms-in-europe-final.pdf. |
[46] | Troupin D, Carmel Y(2014) Canagro-ecosystems efficiently complement protected area networks? Biological Conservation, 169, 158-166. |
[47] | UNEP-WCMC (2023) December 2023 Update of the WDPA and WD-OECM. (accessed on 2024-10-28) https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/resources/december-2023-update-of-the-wdpa-and-wd-oecm. |
[48] | UNEP-WCMC (2025) February 2025 Update of the WDPA, WD-OECM and GD-PAME. (accessed on 2025-02-16) https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/resources/february-2025-update-of-the-wdpa-and-wd-oecm. |
[49] | UNEP-WCMC, IUCN (2024) Protected Planet Report 2024. (accessed on 2024-11-15) https://pp-digital-report-files.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/Protected+Planet+Report+2024.pdf. |
[50] | UNEP-WCMC, IUCN (2025) Discover the World’s Protected and Conserved Areas-Global Statistics. (accessed on 2025-02-15) https://www.protectedplanet.net/en. |
[51] | Wang J, Seyler BC, Phuntsok TS, Lu YL, Tsomo L(2022) Traditional beliefs, culture, and local biodiversity protection: An ethnographic study in the Shaluli Mountains Region, Sichuan Province, China. Journal for Nature Conservation, 68, 126213. |
[52] | Wang W, Gao JX(2024) Progress and prospects of the construction of protected area system with national parks as the main body in China. Research of Environmental Sciences, 37, 2100-2109. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 王伟, 高吉喜 (2024) 我国以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系建设进展与展望. 环境科学研究, 37, 2100-2109.] | |
[53] | Wang W, Li JS(2021) In-situ conservation of biodiversity in China: Advances and prospects. Biodiversity Science, 29, 133-149. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 王伟, 李俊生 (2021) 中国生物多样性就地保护成效与展望. 生物多样性, 29, 133-149.] | |
[54] | Woodley S, Locke H, Laffoley D, MacKinnon K, Sandwith T, Smart J(2019) A review of evidence for area-based conservation targets for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. PARKS, 25, 31-46. |
[55] | Woodley S, MacKinnon K, McCanny S, Pither R, Prior K, Salafsky N, Lindenmayer D(2015) Managing protected areas for biological diversity and ecosystem functions. In: Protected Area Governance and Management (eds WorboysGL, LockwoodM, KothariA, FearyS, PulsfordI),pp.651-684. ANU Press, Canberra. |
[56] | Yang R, Hou SY, Zhang Y, Zhao ZC(2024) The necessity and feasibility of establishing conservation compatible land in China. Biodiversity Science, 32, 23454. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 杨锐, 侯姝彧, 张引, 赵智聪 (2024) 论建立中国自然保护兼用地的必要性和可行性. 生物多样性, 32, 23454.]
DOI |
|
[57] |
Zhang K, Zou CX, Zhang Y, Liu XM, Gao JX(2022) Understanding the connotation of the ecological conservation redline from its delineation process and attribute characteristics. Biodiversity Science, 30, 21464. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
[ 张琨, 邹长新, 张怡, 刘晓曼, 高吉喜 (2022) 从划定历程与属性特征正确认识生态保护红线内涵. 生物多样性, 30, 21464.]
DOI |
|
[58] |
Zhang Y, Liu J, Zhu CQ(2015) IUCN green list of protected areas: Introduction, progress, opportunities and challenges for protected areas in China. Biodiversity Science, 23, 437-439. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
[ 张琰, 刘静, 朱春全 (2015) 自然保护地绿色名录: 内容、进展及为中国自然保护地带来的机遇和挑战. 生物多样性, 23, 437-439.]
DOI |
[1] | 卢晓强, 董姗姗, 马月, 徐徐, 邱凤, 臧明月, 万雅琼, 李孪鑫, 于赐刚, 刘燕. 前沿技术在生物多样性研究中的应用现状、挑战与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 24440-. |
[2] | 郭雨桐, 李素萃, 王智, 解焱, 杨雪, 周广金, 尤春赫, 朱萨宁, 高吉喜. 全国自然保护地对国家重点保护野生物种的覆盖度及其分布状况[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24423-. |
[3] | 武慧, 俞乐, 杜贞容, 赵强, 戚文超, 曹越, 王金洲, 申小莉, 孙尧, 马克平. 基于遥感监测的《昆蒙框架》执行进展快速评估: 路径与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24526-. |
[4] | 郭旋, 何思源, 闵庆文. 农业部门履行《生物多样性公约》的思路与途径——来自重要农业文化遗产管理的启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24527-. |
[5] | 周志华, 金效华, 罗颖, 李迪强, 岳建兵, 刘芳, 何拓, 李希, 董晖, 罗鹏. 中国林草部门落实《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》的机制、成效分析及建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24487-. |
[6] | 苏红巧, 余得光, 牟昆仑. 国家公园与国土空间规划和用途管制制度衔接路径探讨[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24570-. |
[7] | 刘立, 臧明月, 马月, 万雅琼, 胡飞龙, 卢晓强, 刘燕. 央地协同推动国家生物多样性战略和行动计划执行的措施、进展与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24532-. |
[8] | 王晓倩, 邓毅. 与《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》衔接的中国OECMs关键问题与推进策略[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24569-. |
[9] | 顾婧婧, 刘宜卓, 苏杨. 基层地方政府在完成《昆蒙框架》中的作用和难点: 基于《联合国气候变化框架公约》任务的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24585-. |
[10] | 田志奇, 苏杨. 环境相关国际公约的中国履约模式和在《生物多样性公约》中的应用: 从完成《昆蒙框架》目标和发挥国家公园作用的角度[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24593-. |
[11] | 姜雪原, 徐嘉忆, 盛学敏, 朱源. 《中国生物多样性保护战略与行动计划(2023‒2030年)》与《昆蒙框架》的协同与差异[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24575-. |
[12] | 刘蕾, 郝志明, 杜乐山, 刘海鸥. 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》视角下将性别考虑纳入中国生物多样性治理[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(1): 24235-. |
[13] | 宋阳, 柳军, 何少林, 徐薇, 程琛, 刘博, 余绩庆. 我国能源企业生物多样性保护主流化管理路径[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(1): 24345-. |
[14] | 苏荣菲, 陈睿山, 俞霖琳, 吴婧彬, 康燕. 基于红外相机调查的上海市长宁区社区生境花园生物多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(8): 24068-. |
[15] | 田瑜, 李俊生. 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》“3030”目标的内涵及实现路径分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24086-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn